Irc:124-2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Irc:124-2017 IRC:124-2017 BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR INDIAN CITIES Published by: INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS Kama Koti Marg, Sector-6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110 022 NOVEMBER, 2017 Price : ` 600/- (Plus Packing & Postage) IRC:124-2017 First Published : November, 2017 (All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication shall be reproduced, translated or transmitted in any form or by any means without the permission of the Indian Roads Congress) Printed at India Offset Press, Delhi - 110 064 500 Copies IRC:124-2017 CONTENTS S. No. Description Page No. Personnel of the Highways Specifications and Standards Committee i-ii Abbreviations iii Definitions iv Introduction 1 1. Bus Rapid Transit System (BRT) 2 2. Role of BRT 4 2.1 Forms of Road-Based Public Transport with Priority 4 2.2 Light Rail Transit (LRT) 10 2.3 BRT vs. Road Expansion 11 2.4 BRT and Grade-Separated Rail 12 3. Planning for BRT 14 3.1 Network Selection 14 3.2 BRT Configuration and System Capacity 17 4. System Design 19 4.1 Dedicated Bus Lane Alignment 19 4.2 Station Alignment 19 4.3 Calculating Corridor Capacity: Basic Approach 22 4.4 Station Saturation 23 4.5 Calculating Corridor Capacity 24 5. Station Design 27 5.1 Bus-Station Interface 27 5.2 Station Layout and Size 31 5.3 Distance between Stations 33 5.4 Architectural Features 33 5.5 Terminal Design 34 6. Corridor Design 36 6.1 Street Elements and Design Configurations 36 6.2 Intersection Design 45 6.3 Corridor Management 49 6.4 BRT Corridor Designs for Special Cases 50 6.5 Pavement Design 51 7. Universal Accessibility 52 7.1 Footpaths 52 7.2 Pedestrian Infrastructure 54 IRC:124-2017 7.3 Passenger Access 54 7.4 Station Ramps 56 7.5 Bus Interior 57 7.6 Bus Stops on Service Extensions 58 8. Vehicle Specifications 58 9. Safety 61 10. BRT Operations 63 10.1 System Monitoring 63 10.2 Fare Collection 64 10.3 Passenger Information 66 10.4 Fleet Management and Scheduling 67 11. Inter-Modal Integration 68 12. Depot Layout Design 68 13. Parking Management 70 14. System Evaluation 71 14.1 Design Evaluation 71 14.2 Performance Evaluation 73 15. Checklist for BRT Infrastructure and Operations Management 74 16. Care to be taken while Implementing BRT 76 16.1 Network Length 76 16.2 Dedicated High Quality Fleet 76 16.3 BRT Lane and not a Bus Lane 76 16.4 BRT Station Location 76 16.5 Median Alignment of BRT Lanes 76 16.6 Intersection Design 77 16.7 Overlap with Rail-Based Mass Transit Systems 77 16.8 Bus Operations Monitoring 77 16.9 BRT Fleet Expansion 77 16.10 Interdepartmental Coordination 78 16.11 Supporting Infrastructure 78 16.12 Fund Allocation 78 16.13 Skilled Manpower 78 17. Comparison of Various Systems Across Parameters 79 References 80 IRC:124-2017 PERSONNEL OF THE HIGHWAYS SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE (As on 23.06.2017) Kumar, Manoj Director General (Road Development) & Special Secretary to Govt. of 1 (Convenor) India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi Singh, B.N. Addl. Director General (Incharge), Ministry of Road Transport and 2 (Co-Convenor) Highways, New Delhi Verma, Dr. S.K. Chief Engineer (R) S,R & T, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, 3 (Member Secretary) New Delhi Members 4 Bamezai, Prof. (Dr.) Gita R&D, Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi 5 Basar, Toli Chief Engineer, PWD, Arunachal Pradesh 6 Bhanot, Balraj Chairman, TED, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi 7 Bongirwar, P.L. Secretary (Retd.), PWD Maharashtra DG(RD) & AS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 8 Gupta, D.P. New Delhi 9 Jain, Prof. (Dr.) S.S. Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 10 Jain, R.K. Chief Engineer (Retd.), PWD Haryana Chief Executive, L.R. Kadiyali & Associates, New Delhi 11 Kadiyali, Dr. L.R. (Expired on 18.02.2016) 12 Lal, Bhure Chairman, Environment Pollution Control Authority, Delhi Engineer-in-Chief, Gurugram Metropolitan Development Authority, 13 Lal, Chaman Haryana 14 Narain, Sunita DG, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi 15 Nashikkar, J.T. Secretary (Retd.), PWD Maharashtra 16 Pandey, R.K. Member (Projects), National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi 17 Parida, Prof. (Dr.) M. Dean, SRIC, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 18 Pateriya, Dr. I.K. Director (Tech), National Rural Roads Development Agency, New Delhi 19 Pawar, Ajit Secretary (Retd.), PWD Maharashtra 20 Porwal, Dr. S.S. (VSM) ADG (Retd.), Border Roads Organisation, New Delhi 21 Raju, Dr. G.V.S. Engineer-in-Chief (Retd.), Roads & Building, Andhra Pradesh 22 Rawat, M.S. Executive Director, AECOM India Pvt. Ltd. 23 Sarangi, D. CGM, National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi 24 Sharma, M.P. Chief Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi DG(RD) & SS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 25 Sharma, S.C. New Delhi i IRC:124-2017 26 Sheokand, Balbir Singh Executive Engineer, PWD Haryana DG(RD) & SS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 27 Singh, Nirmaljit New Delhi 28 Singh, Pawan Kumar GM, 3M India Ltd. DG(RD) & SS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 29 Sinha, A.V. New Delhi 30 Tawade, D.O. Member (T), National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi The Director, 31 Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi (Chandra, Dr. Satish) The Director General, 32 Border Roads Organisation, New Delhi (Shrivastava, Lt. Gen. S.K.) The Director General, 33 Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, New Delhi (Mathur, Vishnu) The Engineer-in-Chief, 34 Military Engineer Services, New Delhi (Sharma, Lt. Gen. Suresh) 35 Tickoo, Bimal Secretary (T), PWD Jammu 36 Tiwari, Prof. (Dr.) Geetam Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi Superintending Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 37 Varshney, Sharad New Delhi 38 Verma, G.L. MD, Engg and Planning Consultants Ltd., New Delhi Corresponding Members 1 Baluja, Dr. Rohit President, Institute of Road Traffic Education, New Delhi 2 Bhowmik, Sunil Engineer-in-Chief (Retd.), Tripura DG(RD) & SS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, 3 Kandasamy, C New Delhi The Director, 4 (Patil, Capt. (Dr.) Rajendra B. Central Institute of Road Transport, Pune Saner) Ex-Officio Members President, (Pradhan, N.K.), Engineer-in-Chief cum Secretary, Works Department, 1 Indian Roads Congress Odisha Director General (Road 2 Development) & Special (Kumar, Manoj), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi Secretary to Govt. of India Secretary General, 3 Nirmal, Sanjay Kumar Indian Roads Congress ii IRC:124-2017 ABBREVIATIONS BA Boarding-Alighting BLT Bus Lost Time BRT Bus Rapid Transit FO Frequency-Occupancy ITS Information Technology Systems LRT Light Rail Transit MOHUA Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs MRT Mass Rapid Transit MV Motorized Vehicles PIS Passenger Information System pphpd Passengers Per Hour Per Direction RFID Radio Frequency Identification ROW Right of Way SPV Special Purpose Vehicle UBS Urban Bus Specification iii IRC:124-2017 DEFINITIONS Bunching: Unintended arrival of two or more public transport vehicles in close succession, often occurring when vehicles operate at high frequencies and/or in mixed-traffic. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): A high-quality bus-based transit system that delivers fast, comfortable, and cost-effective urban mobility through the provision of segregated right- of-way infrastructure, rapid and frequent operations, and excellence in marketing and customer service. Busways: A dedicated lane for existing bus services without any level boarding on low floor buses, SMART fare collection, information display etc. (See also closed and hybrid BRT system.) Closed BRT system: Service by buses that operate only in exclusive busways, complemented by feeder service to trunk stations or terminals. (See also hybrid BRT system) Dedicated lane: A lane in which entry is permitted for specific types of vehicles. Depot: A facility with provision for bus cleaning, maintenance, and parking. Depots also offer office space for bus operators and facilities for drivers including washrooms, canteens, and rest areas. Docking bays: A location in a BRT station where a bus stops and aligns to the boarding platform. Dwell time: The amount of time that a vehicle occupies a given stopping bay. Expressway: A divided highway for through traffic with access control and grade separations at most intersections. Frequency: Number of vehicles per hour that stop at a station. Headway: Length of time that elapses between vehicle arrivals at a stop or station. Hybrid system: Service that directly links origins and destinations with buses that operates both on and off an exclusive busway. (See also closed BRT system) Light Rail Transit (LRT): Electric rail-based technology operated at surface level in exclusive lanes, typically composed of a single rail car or as a short train of cars. Load factor: The ratio of the number of passengers on a vehicle to the vehicle’s capacity. For example, if a bus has a capacity of 70 and an average load of 60 passengers, then the load factor is 0.85. The load factor for a BRT system is determined by the frequency of vehicles and the passenger volume. Higher load factors are more profitable for the system but may result in overcrowding. Median bus lanes: Lanes reserved for buses that are aligned in the middle of a roadway. Mixed traffic lane: A lane designated for use by various types of vehicles and users. Passengers per hour per direction (pphpd): The number of passengers passing by a particular point in a single direction every hour. Passing lanes: Additional bus lane at the station for a given direction of travel that allows buses to pass (overtake) stopped buses. Platform: An area in a BRT station where passengers board and alight from buses.
Recommended publications
  • Highlight / Progress Report
    HIGHLIGHT / PROGRESS REPORT PROJECT NAME: Kinloch Road Regeneration Project Manager: Ian Imlah Reporting Period: 28/03/2012 – 15/08/12 Date report prepared: 9 August 2012 Implementation of the Full Business Project stage: Project stage completion date: 31 May 2013 Case Tolerance levels for this stage: Project Plan + / - 15 working days Project budget + / - 10%, or £10,000 whichever is greater Progress – please refer to Project Plan Key products completed this period Key products outstanding this Revised Key products for next reporting Delivery date (including those completed ahead of schedule) period delivery date period (including brief explanation of why product outstanding) New Road Construction Works is underway Agreement on how to progress with 31/12/2012 Delivery of footway works 31 October land adjacent to former council 2012 depot site Detailed Design for Footway Works Completed Delivery of soft landscaping works 31 May 2013 Soft landscaping design agreed with ABC. Contract documents to be finalised and issued for tender. Royal Hotel Footway Works Complete. Risk Management – please refer to Risk Register (updates risks below in bold italic text) o:\a_campbeltown\cn03_kinloch_road\board_papers\l_150812\cn03_highlight_prog_rep_august 2012.doc Budget Management – please refer to Resource Allocation Schedule Total budget available to complete FBC stage: £100,000 Actual expenditure £102,209 Variance explanation if required: Revenue budget now used – Business Case developed and now progressing implementation stage (capital expenditure) Budget approved – implementation of public £2,080,000 realm and soft landscaping works: Actual expenditure to date (as at 31 July 2012) £715,013 Variance explanation if required: Budget approved - ACHA £800,000 Actual expenditure to date (as at 31 July 2012) £0 Variance explanation if required: Any further information Status update on elements: Public Realm - • Public realm associated with the new road has been procured through the road contract.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING TAXIS SAFER Managing Road Risks for Taxi Drivers, Their Passengers and Other Road Users
    MAKING TAXIS SAFER Managing road risks for taxi drivers, their passengers and other road users May 2016 About PRAISE Using the roads is a necessary part of our working lives. But it’s an ordinary activity that leads to an incredibly high level of injury and death. ETSC’s PRAISE (Preventing Road Accidents and Injuries for the Safety of Employees) project addresses the safety aspects of driving at work and driving to work. Its aim is to promote best practice in order to help employers secure high road safety standards for their employees. The project is co-ordinated by the ETSC secretariat with the support of Fundación MAPFRE, the German Road Safety Council (DVR), the Belgian Road Safety Institute (IBSR-BIVV) and the Dräger Foundation. MAKING TAXIS SAFER Contributing Experts For more information ETSC gratefully acknowledges the invaluable contributions of European Transport Safety Council the following experts in the preparation of this report: 20 Avenue des Celtes B-1040 Brussels Fernando Camarero Rodríguez – Fundación MAPFRE Tel: +32 2 230 4106 [email protected] Ellen Schmitz-Felten – Kooperationsstelle Hamburg IFE www.etsc.eu/praise Lieven Beyl - Belgian Road Safety Institute Jacqueline Lacroix - German Road Safety Council The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of ETSC and do not necessarily Will Murray - Interactive Driving Systems represent the views of the sponsors or the organisations to which the PRAISE experts belong. Deirdre Sinnott - Health And Safety Authority, Ireland Bettina Velten – Draeger Foundation © 2016 European Transport Safety Council MAKING TAXIS SAFER Managing road risks for taxi drivers, their passengers and other road users Authors Luana Bidasca Ellen Townsend May 2016 CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Noise Reduction Approach for Monorail System
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UTHM Institutional Repository INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION APPROACH FOR MONORAIL SYSTEM DJAMAL HISSEIN DIDANE A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the Degree of Master of Science in Railway Engineering Center For Graduate Studies Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia JANUARY 2014 v ABSTRACT This study presents an overview on the possibilities of interior noise reduction for monorail system using passive means. Nine samples out of three materials were subjected for noise test and the performance of each sample was observed. It is found that all of these samples have proved to reduce a significant amount noise at low and high frequencies even though the amount reduced differ from one sample to another. It is also been noticed that this reductions were denominated by means of absorption for some samples such as those from rubber material, and it was dominated by means of reflection for some others such as those from aluminum composite and paper composite. Moreover, from these different acoustic properties of each material, the whereabouts to install every material is different as well. It was suggested that, the rubber material should be installed on the upper floor of the monorail while, the paper composite should be installed under floor, and the aluminum composite should be installed at the outer parts from the monorail such as the apron door, ceiling, etc. However, despite their promising potential to reduce noise, there were few uncertainties with some samples at certain frequency, for example samples from aluminum composite could not reduce noise at 1250 Hz which denotes that it is not a good practice to use this material at that frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Transport Infrastructure
    © IEA ETSAP - Technology Brief T14 – August 2011 - www.etsap.org Road Transport Infrastructure HIGHLIGHTS TECHNOLOGY STATUS - Road transport infrastructure enables movements of people and goods within and between countries. It is also a sector within the construction industry that has demonstrated significant developments over time and ongoing growth, particularly in the emerging economies. This brief highlights the different impacts of the road transport infrastructure, including those from construction, maintenance and operation (use). The operation (use) phase of a road transport infrastructure has the most significance in terms of environmental and economic impact. While the focus in this phase is usually on the dominant role of tail-pipe GHG emissions from vehicles, the operation of the physical infrastructure should also accounted for. In total, the road transport infrastructure is thought to account for between 8% and 18% of the full life cycle energy requirements and GHG emissions from road transport. PERFORMANCE AND COSTS - Energy consumption, GHG emissions and costs of road transport infrastructure fall broadly into the three phases: (i) construction, (ii) maintenance, and (iii) operation (decommissioning is not included in this brief). The construction and maintenance costs of a road transport infrastructure vary according to location and availability of raw materials (in general, signage and lighting systems are not included in the construction costs). GHG emissions resulting from road construction have been estimated to be between 0.37 and 1.07 ktCO2/km for a 13m wide road – depending on construction methods. Maintenance over the road lifetime (typically 40 years) can also be significant in terms of costs, energy consumption and GHG emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying the Island Transport Equivalent to the Greek Islands 179 Roundtable Discussion Paper Lekakou Maria Remoundos George Stefanidaki Evangelia
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Applying the Island Transport Equivalent to the Greek Islands 179 Roundtable Discussion Paper Lekakou Maria Remoundos George Stefanidaki Evangelia University of the Aegean, Chios Applying the Island Transport Equivalent to the Greek Islands 179 Roundtable Discussion Paper Lekakou Maria Remoundos George Stefanidaki Evangelia University of the Aegean, Chios The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 62 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
    [Show full text]
  • Road Drainage in This Chapter
    Road Drainage In this chapter 01 Introduction 3 02 Design principles 5 2.1 Water sensitive design (WSD) or Integrated Stormwater Management (ISM) 5 2.2 Integration of drainage 6 2.3 Tiered objectives for stormwater management design in road reserves 7 2.4 Major/minor drainage 11 03 Surface water management 12 04 Stormwater management devices 13 4.1 Treatment /Management Options Tool Box 15 4.2 Bio-retention swales, rain gardens and tree pits 16 4.3 Pervious paving 17 4.4 Sand filters, gravel trenches and rain tanks 18 4.5 Ponds and wetlands 18 4.6 Swales and vegetated swales 19 4.7 Soakage pits 20 4.8 Proprietary devices 20 05 Kerbs and channels 20 06 Catchpits 22 6.1 Catchpit location 22 6.2 Catchpit design 23 6.3 Catchpit approved types 25 6.4 Catchpit selection criteria 25 6.5 Catchpit inlet selection 25 6.6 Catchpit leads 26 07 Manholes 27 08 Rural road drainage 27 09 Subsoil drains 29 10 Minor culverts 29 11 Special areas 31 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE Road drainage & surface water control 01 Introduction PURPOSE This chapter gives guidance for the design of drainage in the road reserve. It specifies limitations on design choices to achieve consistency across the region, while catering for local conditions. It aims to promote efficiency, effectiveness and economy of capital investment and operational management water sensitive design. SCOPE The situations covered include: • Drainage of surface water within road reserves. • Collection, conveyance and treatment of run-off from roads. • Management of stormwater discharging from land onto road reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • FREIGHT TRANSPORT by ROAD Session Outline
    FREIGHT TRANSPORT BY ROAD Session outline • Group discussion • Presentation Industry overview Industry and products classification Sample selection Data collection Pricing methods Index calculation Quality changes adjustment Weighting UK experience • Peer discussion Group discussion: Freight transport by road • What do you know about this industry? • How important is this industry in your country? • Is there any specific national characteristics to this industry (e.g. specific regulation, market conditions etc)? • What do you think are the main drivers of prices in this industry? Industry overview/1 • Main component of freight transport industry • Includes businesses directly transporting goods via land transport (excluding rail) and businesses renting out trucks with drivers; removal services are also included. • Traditionally, businesses focussed on road haulage only or having ancillary storage and warehousing services for goods in transiting Industry overview/2 • More differentiation now, offering a bundle of freight-related services or supply-chain solutions including: • Freight forwarding • Packaging, crating etc • Cargo consolidation and handling • Stock control and reordering • Storage and warehousing • Transport consultancy services • Vehicle recover, repair and maintenance • Documentation handling • Negotiating return loads • Information management services • Courier services Example - DHL • Major player in the logistic and transportation industry Definitions • Goods lifted: the weight of goods carried, measured in tonnes • Goods
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Road Transport: an Exploratory Study
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Fernández Vázquez-Noguerol, Mar; González-Boubeta, Iván; Domínguez- Caamaño, Pablo; Prado-Prado, José Carlos Article Best practices in road transport: An exploratory study Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM) Provided in Cooperation with: The School of Industrial, Aerospace and Audiovisual Engineering of Terrassa (ESEIAAT), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) Suggested Citation: Fernández Vázquez-Noguerol, Mar; González-Boubeta, Iván; Domínguez- Caamaño, Pablo; Prado-Prado, José Carlos (2018) : Best practices in road transport: An exploratory study, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), ISSN 2013-0953, OmniaScience, Barcelona, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 250-261, http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2525 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/188862 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Assessment (Summary): Transport (Road Transport [Nonurban])1
    Additional Financing of Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridors 2, 5, and 6 (Dushanbe–Kurgonteppa) Road Project (RRP TAJ 49042) SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): TRANSPORT (ROAD TRANSPORT [NONURBAN])1 1. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities 1. Development challenges. Tajikistan is a landlocked mountainous country in Central Asia bordered by Afghanistan, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Kyrgyz Republic, and Uzbekistan. Despite its strategic location, the country had a gross domestic product per capita of just $819, with 32% of the national population living below the poverty line in 2017. Almost 70% of the population lives in rural areas, in territory that is largely mountainous. Tajikistan depends heavily on its road transport corridors to support investment, job creation, trade, and ultimately economic growth and poverty reduction. Ailing transport infrastructure and geographic isolation result in high transport costs and limited access to markets and services, posing significant barriers to the country’s economic and social development. 2. Transport sector overview. The Ministry of Transport (MOT) is responsible for roads, railways, and airports; transport sector policy; and related regulation, planning, operations, and investment. The MOT is headed by a minister and three deputy ministers, and divided into seven departments that include 90 staff at MOT headquarters. The MOT’s subordinate organizations include six state enterprises for transport management and 61 state enterprises for highway maintenance. The country’s transport network comprises approximately 27,000 kilometers (km) of roads, 680 km of railway tracks, and four international airports. Demand for road transport is outpacing demand for other transport modes, with approximately 68% of cargo and 90% of passenger traffic carried by road.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Its Infrastructure
    5 Transport and its infrastructure Coordinating Lead Authors: Suzana Kahn Ribeiro (Brazil), Shigeki Kobayashi (Japan) Lead Authors: Michel Beuthe (Belgium), Jorge Gasca (Mexico), David Greene (USA), David S. Lee (UK), Yasunori Muromachi (Japan), Peter J. Newton (UK), Steven Plotkin (USA), Daniel Sperling (USA), Ron Wit (The Netherlands), Peter J. Zhou (Zimbabwe) Contributing Authors: Hiroshi Hata (Japan), Ralph Sims (New Zealand), Kjell Olav Skjolsvik (Norway) Review Editors: Ranjan Bose (India), Haroon Kheshgi (USA) This chapter should be cited as: Kahn Ribeiro, S., S. Kobayashi, M. Beuthe, J. Gasca, D. Greene, D. S. Lee, Y. Muromachi, P. J. Newton, S. Plotkin, D. Sperling, R. Wit, P. J. Zhou, 2007: Transport and its infrastructure. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Transport and its infrastructure Chapter 5 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................... 325 5.5 Policies and measures ..................................... 366 5.5.1 Surface transport ............................................... 366 5.1 Introduction ..................................................... 328 5.5.2 Aviation and shipping ......................................... 375 5.2 Current status and future trends ................ 328 5.5.3 Non-climate policies ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Distance Bus Services in Europe: Concessions Or Free Market?
    JOINT TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE Discussion Paper No. 2009-21 December 2009 Long-Distance Bus Services in Europe: Concessions or Free Market? Didier VAN DE VELDE Delft University of Technology, Netherlands SUMMARY INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3 1. COUNTRY CASES ............................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Scope and Definitions ............................................................................................. 4 1.2 United Kingdom ..................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Sweden.................................................................................................................... 6 1.4. Norway ................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Poland ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.6. Spain ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.7. Italy ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.8. France ................................................................................................................... 11 1.9. Germany ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport - VERSION 1 Bus Infrastructure Public Transport – Bus Infrastructure
    Public Transport - VERSION 1 Bus Infrastructure Public transport – bus Infrastructure In this chapter 01 Introduction 5 Bus stop types 35 07 02 Design parameters 6 Bus stop elements 40 08 2.1 Design vehicles 6 8.1 Bus stop kerbs 41 2.2 Design for bus drivers 11 8.2 Bus stop passenger area 44 2.3 Design for bus users 11 8.3 Bus shelters 46 8.4 Landscaping 52 03 Movement or upgrading of bus stops 15 Bus stop lighting 56 09 04 Bus stop location 15 4.1 Decisions about bus stop location 15 Bus stop branding 57 10 4.2 Bus stop spacing 16 Public transport interchanges 57 4.3 Bus stops for school bus routes 17 11 4.4 Bus stop capacity 17 Electric buses 57 12 4.5 Bus stop placement 19 4.6 Bus stop locations to avoid 23 Cycleways at bus stops 58 13 05 Bus stop layout 24 Bus layover and driver facilities 60 14 5.1 Bus stop layout types 26 14.1 Factors influencing bus layover location 61 14.2 Bus layover design 61 06 Bus stop signs and markings 33 6.1 Bus stop sign 33 6.2 Bus box road marking 34 6.3 No stopping at all times road marking 34 6.4 Bus stop road text 34 6.5 Coloured surface treatment 35 5794_16.04.21 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE 3 Public transport – bus Infrastructure 01 Introduction PURPOSE Well-designed bus infrastructure must: • Provide easy access for buses through o accessible and safe walking routes to the bus stop o consider all user groups who will have different needs o making it easy and accessible to board and alight from the bus.
    [Show full text]