DOCSLIB.ORG

Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Monitoring Draft Plan*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Monitoring Draft Plan* Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Monitoring Draft Plan* Vision: Sustainable and thriving communities empowered through informed conservation *As of May, 2016 1 Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Monitoring Plan Vision: Sustainable and thriving communities empowered through informed conservation 1. Background Micronesia Challenge and socioeconomic monitoring In March 2006 all five Chief Executives of the Republic of Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam agreed to globally declare ambitious conservation targets in order to sustain the biodiversity, protect the culture and environment, and sustain the livelihoods of Micronesian island communities.1 The Chief Executives united the region and launched the Micronesia Challenge (MC) conservation initiative. This shared commitment by the leaders of the region is to “effectively conserve at least 30% of the near-shore marine resources and 20% of the terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020.” Later in 2006, at the 8th Retreat of the Micronesians in Island Conservation (MIC) Network, participants discussed the difficulty of satisfying the needs of all stakeholders, yet suggested that the definition of effective conservation in Micronesia must consider a balanced approach that uses a combination of traditional and modern conservation practices.2 Later that same year, a definition of “effective conservation” was drafted and preliminarily approved at the 1st MC Planning Meeting, stating that effective conservation: “entails the social, traditional, political, biological, financial, and legal aspects of sustainable use of at least 30% of marine resources and 20% of the terrestrial area keeping in mind the overall management of surrounding areas, and finding a right balance between resource utilization by communities to sustain their cultural values, socio-economic development, and prosperity.”3 This definition of effective conservation has since been adopted and sustained, keeping in mind the overall management of surrounding areas, and finding a right balance between resource utilization by communities to sustain their cultural values, socio- economic development, and prosperity.” The effectiveness of conservation and the importance of benefits of conservation to people is the impetus for socioeconomic monitoring planning and implementation. Site and monitoring population target(s) 1 Declaration of Commitment: ‘The Micronesia Challenge’. 2006. 2 MC Regional Support Team Concept Paper. 2006. 3 Micronesia Challenge. 2006. “1st Regional Workshop Report.” 2 The regional SEM effort is being implemented to systematically understand and monitor our island community’s human well-being. The SEM sites for each jurisdiction will be determined by that jurisdiction with support and guidance from SEM team and mentors. MC Management plan There is no formal management plan for the Micronesia Challenge, however there is a Micronesia Challenge "We Are One" Business Plan. Moreover, each MC site either has or is in process of developing a management plan and should be referenced at the jurisdictional level. Purpose and history of monitoring The first MC Measures Working Group meeting took place on Pohnpei in 2008 to build on the foundation laid during the Regional Action Planning Meeting. The meeting defined a proposed process and timeline for the periodic (biological) measurement and analysis of progress made toward achieving the goals of the MC. The meeting participants identified the regional overlaps and gaps associated with biological and social indicators related to natural resource management across terrestrial and marine ecosystems by participating agencies and organizations, a shared set of results chains that are related to the MC goals, and reached consensus around a proposed set of relevant and useful categories of MC measures, and a possible set of corresponding indicators to be collected across jurisdictions, as appropriate. It was agreed that refinement of these indicators was still needed, along with a plan for how to build the necessary capacity to measure these indicators within the jurisdictions. In August of 2012, the First MC Socioeconomic Measures workshop was held. It was the fifth in a series of ongoing meetings of the MC Measures Working Group. The participants, with the assistance of socioeconomic monitoring experts, worked together to identify measures of progress in achieving the goal of effective conservation. Over three days representatives from each of the MC jurisdictions met in Koror, Republic of Palau, to lay the foundations for socioeconomic monitoring of the Challenge. As a result, a small set of socioeconomic indicators was selected and agreed by all jurisdictions to measure at their various MC sites. These indicators selected focus on the aspects of human wellbeing that the participants agreed on as being most important for Micronesia Challenge and the processes that are relevant to achieving them. They are also considered to be relevant to all jurisdictions, and are attributed to or contributed by MC efforts and feasible to measure. The three most important human wellbeing domains for MC efforts are: Sustainable Livelihood, Good Governance, and Education/Built Capacity. Indicator areas related to these attributes were then discussed and agreed upon. Because the process of MC was identified as crucial for achieving human wellbeing objectives, participants also discussed and agreed on process indicator areas. Through a number of rounds of comments and edits after the workshop, the initial 3 indicators have been revised and tailored to best gauge the extent to which MC addresses the human wellbeing objectives and process to achieve them. An Appendix for the MC indicators was produced in September 2013 and tested in several sites in the MC countries (see Appendix). During the 2nd MC Social Measures workshop in June 2015, these indicators were revisited and revised (See Table XX for the revised MC indicators) Stakeholders and participation/consultation plans At the regional level, the MC SEM Team is a network of donors, advisors, managers, and practitioners in environmental, resource, societal, and conservation area management working in the region, who provide technical, policy, funding, resources and communication support to the MC Regional Office and MC jurisdictions as needed and appropriate. Key members include the Micronesia Conservation Trust (MCT), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), RARE International, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Locally Managed Marine Area Network (LMMA), , the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), the Pacific Islands Forum, the US Department of Interior, US Forest Service, Palau International Coral Reef Center (PICRC), Pacific Islands Managed and Protected Areas Community (PIMPAC), the College of the Marshall Islands (CMI) and all of the resource management agencies and local conservation NGOs in each of the islands. The social networks are, as shown in Figure 1, strategically aligned to address the various capacity needs of the MC jurisdictions while leveraging each other's resources and avoiding duplicating efforts while maintaining a long-term vision of greater Micronesia. 4 Figure 1: Each conservation audience listed on the left is served by a social network listed on the right. (Image adapted from PIMPAC.) The SEM Core Team is a subgroup within the MC Measures Working Group and the Communications Working Group, as shown in Figure 1. 5 Figure 2: Organizational framework for the MC. At the jurisdictional level, the key stakeholder groups are those from whom the data for the MC indicators come from and whom participate in the collection and use of the data. These are summarized in the Column “Targets for Information” in the table XX below: Indicator Type Targets for Information MC1. Perception of change in food Site Level Census/Survey of the communities, SE availability. POCs MC2. Household participation in Site Level NGOs, Gov. Agencies, Traditional leaders, natural resources management SE POCs planning or decision making MC3. Number of community Site Level NGOs, Gov. Agencies, Traditional leaders, driven management plans SE POCs endorsed by stakeholders MC4. Change in violations and Site Level NGOs, Gov. Agencies, Traditional leaders, illegal activities related to fishing, SE POCs harvesting, and use of natural resources. MC5. Education Site Level MC6. Accessibility of reports to all Initiative MC Regional Coordinator stakeholders. Level MC7. Use of scientific data in Initiative MC Regional Coordinator decision making of MC. Level 6 MC8. Community awareness of Initiative MC SE POCs the MC Level MC9. Community support for the Initiative MC SE POCs MC Level MC10. Commitment of Micronesia Initiative MC Regional Coordinator Challenge governments to human Level wellbeing objectives. MC11. Micronesia Challenge Initiative MC Regional Coordinator regional coordination effort. Level Monitoring objectives Through the minimum set of agreed MC-SEM indicators, we are hoping to begin to monitor these same specific human wellbeing outcomes and process related aspects of the Micronesia Challenge at the site level. However, because every site is unique, and as a result, site specific socioeconomic assessments will vary greatly throughout the region, users of these guidelines may select the following indicators and develop new ones that are relevant to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Little Islands, Big Strides
    Subsistence and commercial fishing, expanding tourism and coastal development are among the stressors facing ecosystems in Micronesia. A miracle in a LITTLE ISLANDS, conference room Kolonia, Federated States of Micronesia — Conservationist BIG STRIDES Bernd Cordes experienced plenty of physical splendor during a ten-day Inspired individuals and Western donors trip to Micronesia in 2017, his first visit to the region in six years. Irides- built a modern conservation movement in cent fish darted out from tropical corals. Wondrous green islands rose Micronesia. But the future of reefs there is from the light blue sea. Manta rays as tenuous as ever. zoomed through the waves off a beach covered in wild coconut trees. But it was inside an overheated By Eli Kintisch conference room on the island of Pohnpei that Cordes witnessed Palau/FSM Profile 1 perhaps the most impressive sight on his trip. There, on the nondescript premises of the Micronesia Con- servation Trust, or MCT, staff from a dozen or so environmental groups operating across the region attended a three-day session led by officials at MCT, which provides $1.5 million each year to these and other groups. Cordes wasn’t interested, per se, in the contents of the discussions. After all, these were the kind of optimistic PowerPoint talks, mixed with sessions on financial reporting and compliance, that you might find at a meeting between a donor and its grantees anywhere in the world. Yet in that banality, for Cordes, lay the triumph. MCT funds projects Most households in the Federated States of Micronesia rely on subsistence fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity The Federated States of Micronesia 2014 This report was prepared by the Micronesia Conservation Trust in collaboration with the Federated States of Micronesia Resources and Development Department with the generous financial assistance of the Global Environment Facility. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Part I: Update to the status, trends, threats and implications for human wellbeing Q1: Why is biodiversity important for the Federated States of Micronesia? ...................................... 8 Q2: What major changes have taken place in the status and trends of biodiversity? .................... 15 Q3: What are the main threats to biodiversity? ......................................................................................... 22 Q4: What are the impacts of the changes in biodiversity for ecosystem services and the socio- economic and cultural implications of these impacts? ............................................................................ 27 Part II: Biodiversity strategic action plans, their implementation, and the mainstreaming of biodiversity Q5: What are the country’s biodiversity targets? ..................................................................................... 30 Q6: How have the country’s biodiversity strategic action plans been updated to incorporate these targets? .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesia Challenge Action Planning Meeting
    Micronesia Challenge Action Planning Meeting December 4 – 7, 2006 Republic of Palau Index Acronyms ____________________________________________________________________ 3 Participants __________________________________________________________________ 4 Jurisdictional Status Reports____________________________________________________ 7 Executive Session _____________________________________________________________ 7 Policy & Finance Session _______________________________________________________ 9 Technical Sessions ___________________________________________________________ 11 I. Effective Conservation Breakout Session _______________________________________ 11 II. 30% Near-shore Marine Breakout Session ______________________________________ 12 III. 20% Terrestrial Breakout Session_____________________________________________ 13 IV. Outreach Breakout Session_________________________________________________ 15 Jurisdictional Breakout Sessions _______________________________________________ 16 Recommendations to the Chief Executives ________________________________________ 17 Next Steps __________________________________________________________________ 18 Attachment 1: Republic of Palau (ROP) Status Report ______________________________ 20 Attachment 2: Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) Status Report ___________________ 23 Attachment 3: Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) Status Report____ 25 Attachment 4: U.S. Territory of Guam Status Report________________________________ 29 Attachment 5: Republic of the Marshall Islands
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesia Challenge "We Are One" Business Plan
    We are One Business Plan and Conservation Campaign Micronesia Challenge This page: Natural wonders are found even in the smallest riffles, such as this one in Kosrae. ©KCSO. Cover: The Micronesia Challenge seeks to permanently protect mountain to reef habitats and the species that live within them, such as these Yellow Tail Fusiliers. ©Ethan Daniels/Shutterstock. Our wonders Your generosity A future secured We are One Help protect some of the most pristine, splendid environments on earth. The Micronesia Challenge brings together three nations, two territories, thousands of communities, and hundreds of international partners all working as one to permanently and effectively protect over 14,000 square kilometers of marine and terrestrial habitats. By helping us reach our goal of raising $55 million dollars for an endowment to support a wide range of annual conservation activities, you will help us protect thousands of unique and endemic species, and preserve a way of life for generations to come. Please, give generously to the Micronesia Challenge. We are Micronesia We are One Republic of Palau U.S. Territory of Guam U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Federated States of Micronesia Republic of the Marshall Islands Micronesia is alike, yet different. Isolated, yet connected. Small, but immense. e are joined as one. For our children, and the world. 500,000 people. 2,000 islands. 12 languages. 5 Micronesian jurisdictions. From the top: Flags of Palau, Guam, CNMI, FSM, and RMI Underwater scenes such as this one highlight the variety of macro- and microfauna present on Micronesian Reefs. ©Isabelle Kuehn/Shutterstock. 30, 20, one Micronesia The Micronesia Challenge is a shared commitment to conserve at least 30% of near-shore marine resources and 20% of terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Palau’S Actions on IAS
    1 Bioinvasion and Global Environmental Governance: The Transnational Policy Network on Invasive Alien Species Palau’s Actions on IAS Description3 Independent from UN trusteeship since Oct. 1st, 1994, Palau is one of the world’s youngest and smallest nations (it is populated by scarcely more than 20,000 people). Palau, a series of islands about 459 square km in the North Pacific Ocean, southeast of the Philippines and northeast of Indonesia. Palau consists of eight major islands as well as approximately 250 other minor islands. The country is primarily situated over corral islands on the edge of a large barrier reef. Palau’s coral reefs have both high species diversity and high habitat diversity. Palau’s reefs contain more than 350 species of hard corals, 200 species of soft corals, 300 species of sponges, 1,300 species of reef fish, and endangered species such as the dugong, saltwater crocodile, sea turtles, and giant clams.9 It is a democratic presidential republic, whose primary industries are tourism, fishing, and subsistence farming. In 2005, President Tommy E. Remengesau, Jr. took a leading role in the Micronesia challenge to conserve 30 percent of near shore coastal waters and 20 percent of forest land by 2020. In terms of trade, Palau’s main partners are the United States, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Its main imports consist of machinery, fuels, metals, and foods while it exports seafood and garments. Overview of Biodiversity CBD Country Profile The Nature Conservancy: Coral Reef Case Study Pacific Biodiversity Information Forum: Country Data Legislation relating to IAS Palau National Code Title 25, Chapter 20 “regulates certain aspects of the international trade in plants and animals in order to protect Palau against the introduction and further dissemination of injurious insects, pests, and diseases into and within the Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • His Excellency Tommy E. Remengesau, Jr. President of Palau
    A Celebration of Island Leadership: Voluntary Commitments to Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods on Islands COP High Level Event, 27 May 2008 Bonn, Germany His Excellency Tommy E. Remengesau, Jr. President of Palau I hope you enjoyed those beautiful images and inspiring highlights of our Micronesia Challenge. My friends, I am very honoured to once again attend the CBD’s Conference of the Parties here in Bonn and to participate in this very special high level event celebrating Island commitments to Sustainable Livelihoods. I would first like to offer my sincere appreciation to our host, the government of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas, and thank them for this opportunity to recognize and celebrate the exciting initiative developing across the Caribbean. I also want to express my deep gratitude to President James Michel of the Republic of the Seychelles, who has helped bridge the distance between oceans and sow the seeds of a new vision, not only for the future of our islands, but of our planet as well. I know that he really wished to be with us all tonight. Tonight I am speaking on behalf of the many partners that have made the Micronesia Challenge possible. Unfortunately, the most noteworthy of this group is President Mori of the FSM, who has provided his strong support to the strengthening of the Challenge could not make it here tonight due to transportation problems. I want to particularly acknowledge the delegates here from all five jurisdictions in the Challenge – the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • MICRONESIANS in ISLAND CONSERVATION Lessons from a Conservation Leaders’ Learning Network: 2000 - 2010
    December 2011 Asia Pacific Conservation Region Marine Program Report No 5/11 MICRONESIANS IN ISLAND CONSERVATION Lessons from a Conservation Leaders’ Learning Network: 2000 - 2010 Report by: Mae Bruton-Adams, Nina Paige Hadley, Audrey Newman and Susi Menazza Olmsted With assistance from: Elizabeth Winternitz-Russell Editor: Liz Isaac COVER PHOTO © Angelo O’Conner Villagomez. 11th Micronesians in Island Conservation Network Retreat, January 2009, Kepirohi Waterfall, Pohnpei PICTURED LEFT TO RIGHT, FRONT TO BACK Row 1: Patterson Shed, Conservation Society of Pohnpei; Alissa Takesy, FSM Protected Areas Network; Enktuya Oidov, TNC Mongolia Program; Mae Bruton- Adams, TNC Micronesia Program; Fran Castro, Mariana Island Nature Alliance, Department of Environmental Quality Saipan and MC Mariana. Row 2: Dalin Nichop, RARE Pride Campaign, Chuuk; Cheryl Calaustro, RARE Pride Campaign, Guam, Department of Agriculture; Mary Rose Nakayama, Conservation & Environmental Protection Programme and daughter Marain; Willy Kostka, Micronesia Conservation Trust; Dr. Tholman Alik, Yela Environment Landowner’s Association; William William, Yela Environment Landowner’s Association. Row 3: Charlene Mersai, Micronesia Challenge; Ricky Carl, TNC Micronesia Program; Bill Raynor, TNC Asia Pacific Marine; Peter Houk, Pacific Marine Resources Institute; Steve Why, Marshall Islands Conservation Society. Row 4: Michael Connor, TNC California; Wisney Nakayama, Chuuk Conservation Society. PUBLISHED BY: The Nature Conservancy © 2011, The Nature Conservancy. All Rights Reserved. AUTHOR CONTACT Mae Bruton-Adams [email protected] Nina P. Hadley [email protected] Audrey Newman [email protected] Susi Menazza Omsted [email protected] SUGGESTED CITATION Bruton-Adams, M., N.P. Hadley, A. Newman, and S. Menazza Olmsted. 2011. Micronesians in Island Conservation - Lessons from a Conservation Leaders’ Learning Network: 2000-2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesia Challenge
    Micronesia Challenge U.S. Coral Reef Task Force September 23, 2016 Evangeline Lujan Guam Focal Point What is the Micronesia Challenge? The Micronesia Challenge is a shared commitment to conserve at least 30% of near-shore marine resources and 20% of terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020. Why the Micronesia Unique cultures and geography Challenge? 500,000 people 2,000 islands 12 languages Global rarities 2 World Heritage Sites 3 Ramsar Wetlands 3 Biosphere Reserves 53 IUCN-listed threatened species Spectacular biodiversity 1,500 plant species 1,300 fish species 535 coral species © Robyn J What are the Goals of the Micronesia Challenge ? • Sustain our unique island biodiversity; • Ensure a healthy future for our island people; • Protect our unique island cultures; • Guard the foundations of our future development, our pristine island environments; • Sustain the livelihoods of our island communities; • Contribute to global and national targets History of the MC 2004 International community commits to Protected Areas (CBD COP 7, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) 2005 Palau invites chief executives from the Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, the Marshall Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands to join the Micronesia Challenge (MC), effectively conserving at least 30% of the near-shore marine resources and 20% of terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020, at the 12th US Coral Reef Task Force Meeting (Palau) 2006 Leaders from all five MC jurisdictions sign Micronesia Challenge declaration 1st MC Regional Action Planning meeting (Palau)
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesia Challenge Socio-Economic Pilot Study, Palau
    PICRC Technical Report No. 14-08 Micronesia Challenge Socio-economic Pilot Study, Palau Danika Kleiber2 and Shirley Koshiba1 © Ian Shives PICRC Technical Report No. 14-08 March 2014 1Palau International Coral Reef Center 1 M-Dock Road P.O. Box 7086 Koror, Palau 96940 2The University of British Columbia Fisheries Centre, 2202 Main Mall,Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V6T 1Z4 54 PICRC Technical Report No. 14-08 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION......................................................................... 6 METHODS ................................................................................. 7 RESULTS .................................................................................. 11 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................. 25 REFERENCES ............................................................................ 26 APPENDICES ............................................................................ 26 Appendix 1: Copy of Household Survey Appendix 2: Copy of Individual Adults Survey Appendix 3: Copy of Individual Children Survey Appendix 4: Copy of Key Informant Interview Survey 2 PICRC Technical Report No. 14-08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Micronesia Challenge (MC), a regional conservation initiative, was endorsed in 2006 by chief executives from the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment GEF Project “Micronesia Challenge: Sustainable Finance Systems for Island Protected Area Management” (GEF Project ID: 3626)
    Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment GEF Project “Micronesia Challenge: Sustainable Finance Systems for Island Protected Area Management” (GEF project ID: 3626) FINAL REPORT Evaluation Office of UN Environment May 2017 Evaluation Office of UN Environment This report has been prepared by Dr. Nigel Varty and is a product of the Evaluation Office of UN Environment. The findings and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Member States or the UN Environment Senior Management. For further information on this report, please contact: Evaluation Office of UN Environment P. O. Box 30552-00100 GPO Nairobi Kenya Tel: (254-20) 762 3389 Email: [email protected] Micronesia Challenge: Finance Systems for Island Protected Area Management GEF ID 3626 May/2017 All rights reserved. © (2017) Evaluation Office of UN Environment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Terminal Evaluation was prepared for the Evaluation Office of UN Environment by Dr. Nigel Varty. The report benefits from a peer review conducted within Evaluation Office of UN Environment. The author would like to thank all those who agreed to be interviewed for the evaluation (list of names annexed to this report), and Tiina Piiroinen, Mela Shah and Harriet Matsaert and Genta Konci at the UNEP Evaluation Office (EO) in Nairobi, Dr Greg Sherley formerly at the UNEP Pacific Office, in Samoa, and Dr Mohamed Sessay, Senior Programme Officer in the GEF Unit, at UNEP in Nairobi, for help with the organisation of the evaluation and reviewing drafts of the inception and final reports, and some very useful discussions. The consultant would particularly like to express his gratitude to Dr Sherley and Peter Thomas, Managing Director of TerraMar Consulting, Australia and former head of TNC for the Pacific, for their support and friendship in helping to deliver what was widely agreed as a difficult evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing the Micronesia Challenge Through New
    PROJECT DATA ADVANCING THE MICRONESIA CHALLENGE THROUGH NEW PROTECTED AREAS Country/Countries: Marshallinseln, Mikronesien, Palau As of: September 2021 Implementing organisation: The project supported efforts to implement the The Micronesia Conservation Trust (MCT) “Micronesia Challenge” by designating protected areas. Island states such as the Marshall Islands, Political partner(s): the Republic of Palau and the Federated States of Babeldaob Watershed Alliance Micronesia face particularly dire threats from the Marine Resources Authority - Marshall impacts of climate change. In 2006, the presidents Islands of these three nations signed the ‘Micronesia Palau Conservation Society Challenge’ with the goal of conserving 30% of near- shore coastal waters and 20% of their land area by Implementing partner(s): the year 2020. For this purpose project partners The Nature Conservancy (TNC) - Indonesia identified target areas for conservation measures, BMU grant: implemented these measures and committed to € 1,551,738.97 sustainable, socio-economic development in the region. Duration: 12/2008 till 12/2010 State of implementation/results Website(s): Project completed http://micronesiachallenge.org/ Adaptation to rising sea levels: a management plan based on ecotourism has been developed for the Yela Swamp Forest with the relevant stakeholders Protection of coastal zones: measures to increase resilience have been integrated into the management plans of six coral reefs in Palau Water-saving measures: seven of the ten states of Babeldaob (Palau) have signed the Babeldaob Watershed Agreement Management of invasive species: stakeholders drawn from the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau have been trained in the design and implementation of projects to combat invasive plant species Advancing The Micronesia Challenge through new protected areas Downloaded on 27.09.21 - 1/1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federated States Micronesia Challenge Sustainable Finance Systems Island Protected Area Management GEF PIF 2008
    PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: Full-sized Project THE GEF TRUST FUND Submission Date: 21 January 2008 Re-submission Date: February 25, 2008 PART I: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION GEFSEC PROJECT ID1: 3626 INDICATIVE CALENDAR GEF AGENCY PROJECT ID: Milestones Expected Dates COUNTRY(IES): Republic of Palau (ROP); Federated States of Work Program (for FSP) April 2008 Micronesia (FSM); Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) CEO Endorsement/Approval Oct 2008 PROJECT TITLE: The Micronesia Challenge : Sustainable Finance GEF Agency Approval Nov 2008 Systems for Island Protected Area Management Implementation Start Dec 2008 GEF AGENCY(IES): UNEP, (select), (select) Mid-term Review (if planned) Jan 2011 OTHER EXECUTING PARTNER(S): Relevant in-country Goverment Implementation Completion Dec 2013 agencies; TNC, CI, Micronesia Conservation Trust (4 years) GEF FOCAL AREA (S): Biodiversity,(select), (select) GEF-4 STRATEGIC PROGRAM(S): BD-SP1, CC-SP4 NAME OF PARENT PROGRAM/UMBRELLA PROJECT:GEF PACIFIC ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABILITY (GEF PAS) A. PROJECT FRAMEWORK (Expand table as necessary) Project Objective: To develop and apply sustainable finance systems and policies that will provide sustainable long-term core resources for effective and adaptive conservation strategies across the three country proponents of the Micronesia Challenge Indicate Indicative Indicative Co- Project whether Expected Expected GEF financing* Total ($) Investment, Outcomes Outputs Financing* Components TA, or STA** ($) % ($) % 1. Design and TA, STA MC Protected Legislative 0 0 3,000,000 100% 3,000,000 Estalishment of Area Network frameworks for establishment of Micronesia fully PAs Challenge operational. strengthened Protected Area and further Network - Critical mass developed. Capacity building achieved in Representative in assesment, capacity for Protected Areas management and effective for the MC monitoring.
    [Show full text]