DOCSLIB.ORG

Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench, Kochi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench, Kochi ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI O.A.NO. 81 of 2015 WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2016/18TH JYAISHTA, 1938 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, MEMBER (J) HON'BLE VICE ADMIRAL M.P.MURALIDHARAN, AVSM & BAR, NM, MEMBER (A) APPLICANT: GROUP CAPTAIN SAJI ABRAHAM, SERVICE NO.16647, S/O P.P.ABRAHAM, AGED 56 YEARS, PRESENTLY POSTED AT AFTC, JALAHALLI WEST, BANGALORE – 560015, BY ADV. SRI. BIJU ABRAHAM VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1.UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001. 2. CHIEF OF AIR STAFF, AIR HEADQUARTERS (VAYU BHAVAN), RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI – 11. BY ADV.SRI. K.M.JAMALUDHEEN, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL OA No. 81 of 2015 : 2 : O R D E R VAdm.M.P.Muralidharan, Member (A): 1. This Original Application has been filed by Group Captain Saji Abraham, No. 16647 essentially seeking a declaration that he is entitled to be considered for promotion to the post of Air Commodore from the date of his promotion as Group Captain. 2. The applicant who is a Group Captain (Time Scale) had earlier filed OA.No.58/2013 before this Tribunal seeking entitlement of Group Captain (Time Scale) to be treated at par with Group Captain (Select) regarding the age of superannuation. By order dated 10 January 2014 in OA.No.58/2013 and other connected cases, this Tribunal had directed the respondents to allow the applicant to serve as Group Captain (Time Scale) till he attains the age of 57 years at par with Group Captain (Select). The applicant who had retired based OA No. 81 of 2015 : 3 : on the existing Regulations at the age of 54 years, was reinstated by the respondents based on the orders of the Tribunal. The applicant subsequently challenged some of the conditions imposed by the respondents at the time of reinstatement vide OA.No.15/2015. That Original Application was later dismissed as infructuous vide order dated 27 November 2015, as the respondents had granted benefits sought by the applicant. 3. Sri. Biju Abraham, the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had considered appeals arising from the decision of the Principal Bench of this Tribunal in TA.No.385/2009 and other similar cases of Group Captains (Time Scale) in Union of India & Ors. vs. Atul Shukla & Ors, (2014) 10 SCC 432. The learned counsel submitted that during the course of hearing, many issues including the age of retirement, rank, cadre, conditions of service and benefits received by Group Captains (TS) vis-a-vis Group Captain (Select) were canvassed by the OA No. 81 of 2015 : 4 : applicants and the respondents. The Apex Court held that Group Captains constitute one rank and cadre after promotion and the distinction between 'Select' and 'Time Scale' was only indicative of the route by which they have risen to the rank. The learned counsel further submitted that the Apex Court had also held that better inter se merit earns an officer accelerated right of promotion to Group Captain's rank, but once officers promoted on Time Scale also attain the rank of Group Captain, they are equal in all respects and cannot be dealt with differently in matters of service conditions or benefits. 4. The learned counsel submitted that the applicant was promoted to the cadre of Group Captain on 11 December 2007. Discarding the orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court for equal opportunity for employment or appointment, Group Captains (Select) who were junior to the applicant were promoted to the rank of Air Commodore. The learned counsel further submitted that OA No. 81 of 2015 : 5 : the applicant and other Group Captains (Time Scale) were not included in the selection process for consideration to the rank of Air Commodore. The respondents were still following the recommendations of the AVS Committee by which restructuring of the officer cadre of the Air Force was ordered vide Ministry of Defence Letter No.2(2)/US(L)/D(Air iii/04 dated 12 March 2005 (Annexure A1). Instead of following the relative seniority based on the date of promotion of each officer into the substantive cadre, respondents are still treating the applicant as junior to Group Captain (Select). The applicant therefore submitted a representation to the respondents (Annexure A3). The learned counsel further submitted that the policy being adopted by the respondents is violative of Para 25 of Defence Service Regulations (Annexure A4). He further submitted that the policy letter of restructuring (Annexure A1) is in violation of service regulations and against the spirit of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Atul Shukla's case (supra). OA No. 81 of 2015 : 6 : 5. The learned counsel submitted that it was a legitimate right of the applicant to be considered for the post of Air Commodore and denial of such consideration is illegal. The learned counsel therefore prayed that Paras 4(b) and 6 of Annexure A1 be set aside and the applicant be declared eligible for consideration to the post of Air Commodore from the date of his promotion to the cadre of Group Captain. The learned counsel also prayed that all promotions made to the rank of Air Commodore be reviewed and the applicant's seniority be protected when promoted as Air Commodore. 6. Sri KM Jamaludheen, the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents submitted that the applicant had initially filed OA.No.420/2015 before the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal at New Delhi seeking the same reliefs (Annexure R1) and when it came up for hearing, observing that OA was not likely to be admitted, the applicant had withdrawn the petition with liberty to file a fresh one (Annexure R2). However, these facts OA No. 81 of 2015 : 7 : had been suppressed by the applicant. Learned counsel further submitted that in his earlier OA also, viz OA.No.58/2013, the applicant had challenged the MOD letter on restructuring of officer cadre of Air Force (Annexure A1), but had only contested the provision regarding disparity in superannuation ages of Group Captain (TS) and Group Captain (Select) and had made no challenges to the other provisions of the policy letter. The learned counsel therefore contended that the present OA was barred by the operation of the principle of res judicata and the applicant cannot raise piecemeal challenge to the above policy. 7. The learned counsel further submitted that the relief now being claimed by the applicant had not been covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Atul Shukla (supra). The Apex Court had only examined the issue of disparity in superannuation ages and held that the Group Captains (TS) were entitled to continue in service upto 54 and 57 years depending upon whether OA No. 81 of 2015 : 8 : they are serving in the flying or ground duty branch of the Air Force. Therefore the observations of the Apex Court in the judgment were in the nature of 'obiter dictum' and were essentially confined to the consideration of the issue of age of superannuation of Group Captains (TS). 8. The learned counsel further submitted that the rank of Group Captain (TS) is granted only after an officer of the rank of Wing Commander fails to make the grade for promotion to Group Captain (Select) on three occasions. After the third time the Officer becomes permanently passed over and is not eligible for any further promotion in his career. Therefore an officer who failed to get promoted to the rank of Group Captain (Select) and was only granted the rank of Group Captain (TS) on completion of 26 years of service has no right to seek promotion to the rank of Air Commodore as he is on a different footing from the officers who had been promoted as Group Captain by selection. The OA No. 81 of 2015 : 9 : promotion policy for Air ranks is based on the principle of merit-cum-seniority and is meant to introduce a merit based system for promotion at senior levels with due consideration to seniority. If Group Captain (TS) are considered for promotion to Air Commodore, the learned counsel submitted that it would bring in mediocrity as those found unfit for selection to Group Captain, would be considered for higher rank at the cost of those who were select listed as Group Captain. 9. The learned counsel submitted that the concept of equality cannot be claimed by the applicant vis-a-vis Group Captain (Select) for purpose of promotion. The concept of equality pre-supposes that likes are to be treated in like manner. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ganga Ram & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., 1970 (1) SCC 377 observed that mere production of inequality is not enough to attract the constitutional inhibition because every classification is likely in some degree to produce some inequality. The Apex Court OA No. 81 of 2015 : 10 : held that the State is legitimately empowered to frame rules of classification for securing the requisite standard of efficiency in service. The learned counsel also submitted that in Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi vs Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 1139, the Apex Court had considered the aspect of Article 16 of the Constitution and had clearly held that Article 16 does not forbid the creation of different grades in the Government services and in that case had held that Article 16 had not been violated merely because Class II Income Tax Officers were not eligible for promotion to higher posts of Commissioners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Admiral Sunil Lanba, Pvsm Avsm (Retd)
    ADMIRAL SUNIL LANBA, PVSM AVSM (RETD) Admiral Sunil Lanba PVSM, AVSM (Retd) Former Chief of the Naval Staff, Indian Navy Chairman, NMF An alumnus of the National Defence Academy, Khadakwasla, the Defence Services Staff College, Wellington, the College of Defence Management, Secunderabad, and, the Royal College of Defence Studies, London, Admiral Sunil Lanba assumed command of the Indian Navy, as the 23rd Chief of the Naval Staff, on 31 May 16. He was appointed Chairman, Chiefs of Staff Committee on 31 December 2016. Admiral Lanba is a specialist in Navigation and Aircraft Direction and has served as the navigation and operations officer aboard several ships in both the Eastern and Western Fleets of the Indian Navy. He has nearly four decades of naval experience, which includes tenures at sea and ashore, the latter in various headquarters, operational and training establishments, as also tri-Service institutions. His sea tenures include the command of INS Kakinada, a specialised Mine Countermeasures Vessel, INS Himgiri, an indigenous Leander Class Frigate, INS Ranvijay, a Kashin Class Destroyer, and, INS Mumbai, an indigenous Delhi Class Destroyer. He has also been the Executive Officer of the aircraft carrier, INS Viraat and the Fleet Operations Officer of the Western Fleet. With multiple tenures on the training staff of India’s premier training establishments, Admiral Lanba has been deeply engaged with professional training, the shaping of India’s future leadership, and, the skilling of the officers of the Indian Armed Forces. On elevation to Flag rank, Admiral Lanba tenanted several significant assignments in the Navy. As the Chief of Staff of the Southern Naval Command, he was responsible for the transformation of the training methodology for the future Indian Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Iv the Indian Naval Auxilary
    PART IV THE INDIAN NAVAL AUXILARY SERVICE REGULATIONS, 1973 AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATIONS FOR THE NAVY, 1965 (INBR 2) NAVAL HEADQUARTERS New Delhi, the 1st October, 1977 (Batch No. 26) The following amendment is made to the Regulations for the Navy, 1965: - Amendment No. 82 Insert New Part IV of the Regulations for the Navy as “INDIAN NAVAL AUXILIARY SERVICE REGULATIONS, 1973.” (SRO 232 dated 7 Aug 73) (File No. RR/0190/67) Amendment No. 191 Amended vide SRO No. 191 dated 28 August, 1995 Published in the Gazette if India, Part II Section 4, dated 09 September, 1995) (SRO 191 dated 28 Aug 95) ( File No. NL/4621) PART IV (STATUTORY) CONTENTS Subjects Page I PRELIMINARY II Officers – Branches, Commissions, Examinations, Probation, Promotion, Secondment and Retirement III Sailors-Recruitment, Promotion, Transfer, Discharges and Retirements IV Appointment and Duties - Section I- Permanent Staff Section II-Duties V Uniform, Victualling and Mess Traps VI Conditions of Service- Section I-Mobilizations and Transfers Section II-Rights/Privileges Section III- Discipline, Offences and Punishments VII Training and related matters- Section I-Training Section II-Accommodation Section III-Employment of Civilian Instructor Officers VIII Financial Regulations- Section I-Pay and Allowances Section II-Disability Pension/Gratuity Section III-Pension entitlements and allowances (ii) LIST OF SCHEDULES Page I Form INXS-1 (Application for enrolement) II Form of Oath/Affirmation III Terms and conditions of service of officers on the Permanent Staff IV Terms and conditions of service of Master Chief Petty Officers, and other sailors on the permanent staff V List of Uniform Items required to be maintained By Officers VI Basic scale of clothing for sailors VII Periods of wear of articles of clothing VIII Additional items of clothing and necessaries- IX Forms X Scale of accommodation for Indian Naval Auxiliary Service Units XI Scale of teenage for camps XII Agreement for extension of service (iii) PART IV (STATUTORY) RECORD OF AMENDMENTS Sl No.
    [Show full text]
  • (Defence Wing) Govenjnt of India New Vice Chief Of
    PRESS INFOREATION BUREAU (DEFENCE WING) GOVENJNT OF INDIA NEW VICE CHIEF OF NAVY FLAG OFFICER COJ'INANDING—IN_CHIEF, sOVTHERN NAVAL CONMAND AND DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVY ANNOUNCED New Delhi Agrahayana 07, 19109 November 28, 1987 Vice Admiral GN Hiranandani presently Flag Officer Commanding—in—Chief, Southern Naval Command (FOC—in—C, SNC) has been appointed as Vice Chief of Naval Staff. He will take over from Vice Admiral JG Nadkarni, the CNS Designate, who will assume the ofice of Chief of the Naval Staff on November Oth in the rank of Admiral. Vice Admiral L. Ramdas presently Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff has been appointed FOC—in—C, SNC. Vice Admiral RP Sawhney, presently Controller Warship Production and Acquisition at Naval Headnuarters, has been appointed as Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff. Vice Admiral GM Hiranandani -was commissioned in 1952 and received his initial training in the United Kingdom and later graduated from the Staff College, Greenwich (U.K.). In 1 971 he served as the Fleet Operations Officer, Western Fleet. His notable - commands at sea include that of the first Kashin class destroyer, INS Rajput which he commissioned in 1980. On promotion to flag rank he was appointed Chief of Staff, Western Naval Command and later Deputy Chief of Naval Staff in the rank of Vice Admiral. He is a recipient of the Param Vishst Seva Medal, Ati Vishist Seva, Medal and Nao Sena Medal. .1,2 -2-- Vice Admiral L. Ramdas was commissioned in 1953 and received his initial trai lug in the U.K.. A communication Specialist, he has held a number of importanf commands a't sea, which inolde Command of the Eastern Fleet, the aircraft carrier INS Vikrant and a modern patrol vessel squadron.
    [Show full text]
  • Realignment and Indian Air Power Doctrine
    Realignment and Indian Airpower Doctrine Challenges in an Evolving Strategic Context Dr. Christina Goulter Prof. Harsh Pant Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, the Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs requests a courtesy line. ith a shift in the balance of power in the Far East, as well as multiple chal- Wlenges in the wider international security environment, several nations in the Indo-Pacific region have undergone significant changes in their defense pos- tures. This is particularly the case with India, which has gone from a regional, largely Pakistan-focused, perspective to one involving global influence and power projection. This has presented ramifications for all the Indian armed services, but especially the Indian Air Force (IAF). Over the last decade, the IAF has been trans- forming itself from a principally army-support instrument to a broad spectrum air force, and this prompted a radical revision of Indian aipower doctrine in 2012. It is akin to Western airpower thought, but much of the latest doctrine is indigenous and demonstrates some unique conceptual work, not least in the way maritime air- power is used to protect Indian territories in the Indian Ocean and safeguard sea lines of communication. Because of this, it is starting to have traction in Anglo- American defense circles.1 The current Indian emphases on strategic reach and con- ventional deterrence have been prompted by other events as well, not least the 1999 Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, which demonstrated that India lacked a balanced defense apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Senior Navy Leaders: Requirements for Flag Officer
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Developing Senior Navy Leaders Requirements for Flag Officer Expertise Today and in the Future Lawrence M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Education of a Field Marshal :: Wellington in India and Iberia
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1992 The education of a field am rshal :: Wellington in India and Iberia/ David G. Cotter University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Cotter, David G., "The ducae tion of a field marshal :: Wellington in India and Iberia/" (1992). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1417. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1417 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EDUCATION OF A FIELD MARSHAL WELLINGTON IN INDIA AND IBERIA A Thesis Presented by DAVID' G. COTTER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1992 Department of History Copyright by David G. Cotter 1992 All Rights Reserved ' THE EDUCATION OF A FIELD MARSHAL WELLINGTON IN INDIA AND IBERIA A Thesis Presented by DAVID G. COTTER Approved as to style and content by Franklin B. Wickwire, Chair )1 Mary B/ Wickwire 'Mary /5. Wilson Robert E. Jones^ Department Chai^r, History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to all in the History department at the University of Massachusetts, especially Professors Stephen Pelz, Marvin Swartz, R. Dean Ware, Mary Wickwire and Mary Wilson. I am particularly indebted to Professor Franklin Wickwire. He performed as instructor, editor, devil's advocate, mentor and friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalent Ranks of the British Services and U.S. Air Force
    EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Commissioned Ranks Marshal of the Admiral of the Fleet Field Marshal Royal Air Force Command General of the Air Force Admiral Air Chief Marshal General General Vice Admiral Air Marshal Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Rear Admiral Air Vice Marshal Major General Major General Commodore Brigadier Air Commodore Brigadier General Colonel Captain Colonel Group Captain Commander Lieutenant Colonel Wing Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Squadron Leader Commander Major Major Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Captain EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT First Lieutenant Sub Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Second Lieutenant Midshipman Second Lieutenant Pilot Officer Notes: 1. Five-Star Ranks have been phased out in the British Services. The Five-Star ranks in the U.S. Services are reserved for wartime only. 2. The rank of Midshipman in the Royal Navy is junior to the equivalent Army and RAF ranks. EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Non-commissioned Ranks Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Class 1 (RSM) Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Warrant Officer Class 2b (RQSM) Chief Command Master Sergeant Warrant Officer Class 2a Chief Master Sergeant Chief Petty Officer Staff Sergeant Flight Sergeant First Senior Master Sergeant Chief Technician Senior Master Sergeant Petty Officer Sergeant Sergeant First Master Sergeant EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Release UK Armed Forces Annual Personnel Report
    UK Armed Forces Annual Personnel Report 1 April 2013 The UK Armed Forces Annual Personnel Report contains figures on strength, intake and outflow of UK Regular Forces. It complements the UK Armed Forces Quarterly and Monthly Personnel Reports by providing greater detail about the sex, ethnicity and rank of the Statistical release Armed Forces. It uses data from the Ministry of Defence Joint Personnel Administration System (JPA). Published: 23 May 2013 (Reissued 26 November 2013) The tables present information about the composition of the UK’s Armed Forces in the most recent financial year. Contents Page Contents page 2 Armed Forces Personnel Key Points and Trends Commentary 3 UK Regular Forces: Strength At 1 April 2013: Table 1 UK Regular Forces Rank 6 There were 170,710 UK Regular Forces personnel, Structure of which 29,060 were officers and 141,650 were Table 1a UK Regular Forces Rank other ranks. Structure by Sex and 7 Ethnicity The percentage of women in the UK Regular Forces Table 2 UK Regular Forces Strength was 9.7% in April 2013. 8 by Service and Age Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) personnel Table 3 UK Regular Officers 9 comprised 7.1% of the UK Regular Forces, Strength by Age and Sex continuing a long term gradual increase in the Table 4 UK Regular Other Ranks 9 Strength by Age and sex proportion of BME personnel. Graph 6 Strength by UK Regular 10 56% of Army personnel were aged under 30, Forces by Age and Rank compared with 48% of the Naval Service and 40% UK Regular Forces: Intake and of the RAF.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Ocean : a New Vision
    2013 (2) ISSN 2277 – 2464 FPRC Journal ________________________________________________________ (a Quarterly research journal devoted to studies on Indian Foreign Policy) ________________________________________________________________ Focus : Indian Ocean : A New Vision Responses, Articles ________________________________________________________ Foreign Policy Research Centre NEW DELHI (INDIA) ________________________________________________________ FPRC Journal 2013(2) Indian Ocean : A New Vision Preface Indian Ocean has the unique distinction of being the only ocean named after a country. For extra‐regional powers, the Indian Ocean has for decades fulfilled the role of an important transit corridor But Sardar KM Pannikar rightly said, “While to other countries, the Indian Ocean is only one of the important oceanic areas, to India it is a vital sea. Her lifelines are concentrated in that area, her freedom is dependent on the freedom of that water surface. No industrial development, no commercial growth, no stable political structure is possible for her unless her shores are protected...” Therefore, there is a realisation across the spectrum that the challenges, opportunities and roles the Indian Ocean provides, need to be discussed seriously in the light of the fragile security environment in the region. It is very heartening to note that a wide galaxy of writers have focused on important themes and other related issues in their writings and comments, for this special issue of FPRC Journal on Indian Ocean. We express our heart-felt thanks to our contributors who have shared our sentiments and accepted our invitation to enrich the contents of the Journal.They are always our source of strength. Mahendra Gaur Indira Gaur Director Mg. Editor Foreign Policy Research Centre New Delhi 1 FPRC Journal 2013(2) Indian Ocean : A New Vision FPRC Journal Focus : Indian Ocean : A New Vision Contributors : RESPONSES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Control by the Indian Navy: a Pragmatic Assessment
    SEA CONTROL BY THE INDIAN NAVY: A PRAGMATIC ASSESSMENT Captain Sanjay Sachdeva Whosoever can hold the sea has command of everything.1 — Themistocles (524–460 B.C.) Introduction Throughout history, control of the sea has been a precursor to victory in war.2 According to Alfred Thayer Mahan, “Control of the sea by maritime commerce and naval supremacy means predominant influence in the world... (and) is the chief among the merely material elements in the power and prosperity of nations”.3 Admiral Reason echoes similar views in his statement that ‘Sea control is absolutely necessary, the thing without which all other naval missions, and most national missions, precariously risk catastrophic failure.’4 Sea control, as a concept, has many diverse interpretations. Corbett had opined that command of the sea is one of those ringing phrases that dominates the imagination but confuses the intellect.5 Milan Vego, a renowned expert, observes that the US Navy has difficulty in properly understanding the true meaning of sea control and of its counterpart, sea denial.6 The Indian Maritime Doctrine defines sea control as a condition where one is able to use a defined sea area, for a defined period of time, for one’s own purposes and at the same time deny its use to the adversary.7 1Naval Doctrine Publication NDP 1: Naval Warfare (Washington DC: Department of the Navy, March 2010), 1. Referred as NDP 1. 2Ibid., 27, 3Geoffrey Till, Seapower A Guide to the Twenty- First Century (New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2013), 1. 4Ibid.,155. 5Ibid.,144.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR COMMODORE FIN MONAHAN OBE DFC Phd RAF
    AIR COMMODORE FIN MONAHAN OBE DFC PhD RAF Air Commodore Fin Monahan joined the Royal Air Force as a cadet pilot at East Lowlands Universities Air Squadron in Edinburgh whilst studying for a degree in French and Business Studies at the University of Stirling. Commissioned in 1992 at the Royal Air Force College Cranwell, he completed flying training on the Tucano and Hawk aircraft. In 1993 he attended the University of Nottingham to study for a Masters in International Relations. In 1996 he was posted to the Harrier Operational Conversion Unit at RAF Wittering. On graduation, he joined IV (Army Co-operation) Squadron at Royal Air Force Laarbruch in Germany and flew on numerous operational tours over the Balkans. In 2000 Fin was posted to Royal New Zealand Air Force Ohakea as an exchange officer flying the A4K Skyhawk in Maritime Strike, Air to Air and Air to Ground roles on 2 and 75 Squadrons. Whilst with the RNZAF, Fin flew extensively across Australia and Asia Pacific. He also instructed on and displayed the CT4 Air Trainer whilst in New Zealand. In 2003 Fin was posted to the Tactical Leadership Programme in Florennes, Belgium. As Air-to-Ground leader, he specialised in Close Air Support, Combat Survival and Rescue and Tactical Support to Maritime Operations. In 2005 Fin was appointed as Executive Officer on 1 (Fighter) Squadron. He completed tours of Afghanistan in 2005, 2006 and 2007 and was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross following an interesting scramble to support embattled ground forces in 2006. In 2007 Fin assumed command of Cambridge University Air Squadron running a busy flying, leadership, sport and adventure training programme.
    [Show full text]