DOCSLIB.ORG

The Preparations for the Last Days Temple

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Preparations for the Last Days Temple PART III The Preparations for the Last Days Temple This is the statute of the law which the LORD has commanded, saying, ‘Speak to the sons of Israel that they may bring you an unblemished red heifer in which is no defect, and on which a yoke has never been placed. Now a man who is clean shall gather up the ashes of the heifer and deposit them outside the camp in a clean place, and the congregation of the sons of Israel shall keep it as water to remove impurity; it is purification from sin." —Numbers 19:2,9 "If the blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkling those who have been defiled, sanctify for the cleansing of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish to God, cleanse your con- science from dead works to serve the living God?" —Hebrews 9:13-14 CHAPTER 15 Searching for the Sacred Site Preparing a Place for the Last Days Temple Once the site for the Miqdash [“Sanctuary”] was fixed in the days of Shemuel [“Samuel”] and King David,it is immutable.All that remains to do at a time such as the present is to rebuild the physical structure,and reinstitute the Temple Service.… (Mishneh Torah, Beth Ha’behira 1:3, 4) All these theories only do damage…because then the Arabs can say,“You your- selves are arguing about it.The Temple wasn’t even on the Temple Mount.” —Dan Bahat, Consulting Archaeologist, Western Wall Tunnel excavation 327 esus said,“Upon this rock I will build My church…”(Matthew 16:18).Ever since He stated those words,“the church” has been debating what “rock” Jesus Jwas referring to.In a similar way the Temple was once built on a rock,the top of Mount Moriah, but exactly what “rock” that was is being vigorously debated by Jewish researchers, rabbis, and archaeologists. As Rabbi Reznick puts it, “The Dome of the Rock is a shrine built to protect the treasure within—the rock.But what,exactly,is that rock?”1 Answering this,and a host of related questions,has made the search for the location of the ancient Temple the most controversial subject engaging students of the Temple today.It is considered a top priority,for if the prophecy concerning the rebuilding of the Temple is to be fulfilled by the efforts of Israeli Jews,then the exact spot of the sacred site must be determined. Rabbi Nahman Kahane of the Young Israel Synagogue and head of the Insti- tute for Talmudic Commentaries contends that the lack of certainty in identi- fying the proper location is one of the major obstacles to rebuilding today:“We have to know where the original place of the altar was. Since no one knows where the altar was,no one is going anywhere on the Temple now.…The Temple now…is off limits to everybody. All of the different opinions…all of the dis- crepancies…surround only one question: Where is the place of the altar? That’s the whole problem.” This problem, facing all who attempt to investigate the original location of the Temple,is caused by a lack of sufficient,objective,mate- rial evidence.However, if the Jews gained sovereignty over the Temple Mount in 1967, and consider this of utmost importance, then why are they unable to verify the exact location? To understand this, we need to consider the present- day situation concerning the Temple Mount. The Problems at Present When the Jews returned from the Babylonian exile they were able to rebuild the Temple not only because they had access to the site, but because significant ruins remained and there were many people still alive who remembered the locations of the buildings of the former Temple. More important, as the Talmud notes, they were able to excavate and expose the foundations of the previous structures so as to know exactly where to rebuild (see Mishne Torah, Beth Ha’behira 1:4). However, no archaeological remains of Solomon’s or Zerub- babel’s Temples are known to have survived Herod’s extensive rebuilding pro- gram,2 and all the actual structures connected with the Herodian Temple itself appear to have been completely erased by the Roman destruction of a.d. 70 and subsequent attempts to further desolate the area (see chapter 5). So apart from 328 Searching for the Sacred Site 329 deductions that can be made from the extant surface structures of the Second Temple period, such as walls, stairs, and underground structures such as tun- nels and cisterns,we are dependent upon biblical and extrabiblical descriptions of the building procedures (both Israeli and comparative regional temples),3 topographical details,and the ceremonial ritual.4 Even then,it has been difficult to pinpoint the location of this place. The Temple Mount platform, built to support the Temple and its courts, has been preserved down through the centuries. While this has helped to limit the area of the search, it is impossible to resolve the matter until there can be more definite archaeological confirmation. Hoever, access to the site for archaeolog- ical excavation or even the use of non-invasive high-tech devices that could reveal underground structures is firmly prohibited.The reasons for this restric- tion fall into two categories: political and religious. Political Problems The Islamic occupation of the entire 35-acre Temple Mount platform (called by Muslims Haram es-Sharif—“the Noble Enclosure”) for most of the past 1,360-plus years has forced Israel to make a political concession of this site for the prospect of peace. The Islamic Wakf,the governing authority of the Temple Mount since 1967, prevents any incursion whatsoever onto the premises regarded as strictly for Muslims. If prayer at this site by non-Muslims is fer- vently fought against, how much more would excavations in search of a rival holy site be prohibited! The Wakf has consistently stated that the only purpose for Israeli archaeological excavations is to destroy the sacred structures of Islam in order to rebuild the Jewish Temple. However, most Israeli archaeologists are secular and have no religious agenda for building a Temple.What’s more, Mus- lims have no interest in any archaeological discoveries related to the Temple Mount because they have continually denied that the site has any connection with the Jewish people or their ancient Temples. They find the archaeological evidence around the site unconvincing because they interpret the data in con- formity with their preconception that nothing Jewish is there. For example, in summarizing the Israeli excavations from 1968–1978 at the southwestern and southern walls of the Temple Mount and the excavation of the Western Wall Tunnel begun in the early 1980s, Adnan Husseini, Executive Director of the Islamic Wakf, stated: “They [Israeli archaeologists] have done 4 to 5 attacks on the mosque from their diggings under it. What they found under the Haram [Temple Mount] is 90% Islamic and 10% pre-Islamic. Now they are digging a 330 THE PREPARATIONS FOR THE LAST DAYS TEMPLE long tunnel [the Western Wall Tunnel] along the wall [of the Al-Aqsa com- pound] under the Moslem Quarter.Already seven buildings owned by Moslems have collapsed due to these diggings.”5 This same authority, along with Yasser Arafat, accused the Israeli govern- ment of actually attacking the mosques on the Temple Mount when it opened an exit to this Western Wall Tunnel in 1995. The investigations of former Jewish holy sites are interpreted by them as attempts to further a Zionist program to replace them on the Temple Mount.For this reason,the Israeli Protection of Holy Places Law supports their position,and makes it a crime to in any way desecrate or restrict access to the Muslim holy sites, which would certainly occur if archaeological excavation took place.For these reasons, no archaeological exca- vations have ever been, or are likely to be, conducted on the Temple Mount. At the same time, archaeological excavations are the only way anyone can deci- sively resolve the question of the Temple’s original location. Religious Problems As we have already seen in chapter 6, the Rabbinate has forbidden any Jew from setting foot on the ‘Azarah, the sacred precinct or enclosure of the ancient Temple. This was decided because it is held that the Ark of the Covenant, which is still believed to be attended by the divine presence, remains hidden some- where beneath the Holy of Holies. Since all Jews today are in a state of ritual defilement, to inadvertently tread on this area would violate the sanctity of the entire Temple Mount. Therefore, observant Jews refrain from even entering the Temple Mount for fear they might happen to tread upon the site of the Holy of Holies. Many of those who have done extensive research in connection with the Temple’s location would never transgress by actually going to the places they have proposed. For example, Orthodox Jew Tuvia Sagiv, though zealous for rightly identifying the site of the Temple, and even so bold as to say that the revered Western Wall was actually connected to Hadrian’s Temple of Jupiter, insists that Jews must remain below the Temple Mount until the Messiah comes. From this viewpoint, archaeologists, like tourists who daily defile the site, have no business on the Temple Mount, even if their efforts could unravel the mys- teries of the Temple’s location. Why Not Build Somewhere Else? Given these problems, many people often ask,“If the Jews want a Temple so badly,and the attempt to wrest the ancient site from the Arabs would provoke a Searching for the Sacred Site 331 war,why couldn’t they just build the Temple somewhere else in Jerusalem?”This may seem reasonable to those outside of Orthodox Judaism, but those within deem it absolutely necessary that the Third Temple be rebuilt exactly where the former two Temples stood.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where Did Solomon Build the Temple? by Dr
    Post Office Box 345, San Antonio, Texas 78292-0345 Kislev –Tevet– Shevat–Adar 5777 / December– January– February 2016–2017 A Publication of CJF Ministries and Messianic Perspectives Radio Network MessianicPerspectives ® God has not forgotten the Jewish people, and neither have we. e are living in tumultuous times. Many things that Historical Background Wwe’ve always taken for granted are being called into question. The people of Israel had three central places of worship in ancient times: the Tabernacle, the First Temple, and the One hotly-disputed question these days is, “Were the an- Second Temple. Around 538 BC, the Jewish captives were cient Temples really on the Temple Mount?” You’d think released by King Cyrus of Persia to return from exile to the fact that Mount Moriah (and the manmade plat- their Land. Zerubbabel and Joshua the priest led the ef- form around it) has been known for many centuries as fort to rebuild the Second Temple, and work commenced “the Temple Mount”1 would provide an important clue, around 536 BC on the site of the First Temple, which the wouldn’t you? Babylonians had destroyed. The new Temple was simpler and more modest than its impressive predecessor had It’s a bit like the facetious query about who’s buried in been.2 Centuries later, when Yeshua sat contemplatively Grant’s tomb. Who else would be in that tomb but Mr. on the Mount of Olives with His disciples (Matt. 24), they Grant and what else would have been on the Temple looked down on the Temple Mount as King Herod’s work- Mount but the Temple? ers were busily at work remodeling and expanding the But not everyone agrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Can They Change?
    See Pages 3, 4, 5 $1.00 WWW.5TJT.COM VOL. 10 NO. 15 22 TEVES 5770 ,una ,arp JANUARY 8, 2010 INSIDE FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK POWER TO THE PEOPLE Faux Frumkeit BY LARRY GORDON Stacey Solomon 22 What Does Jimmy Want? SECURITY THREAT Hannah Reich Berman 29 “When it comes to airline the world. Defining Death Down security,” says Yehuda Dafna, Our talk with Yehuda Dafna Rabbi Avi Shafran 30 “America is backwards.” Dafna, a about security at airports and on MindBiz resident of Woodsburgh and a airlines was of course precipitat- Esther Mann, LMSW 31 member of several Five Towns ed by the events of December shuls, is the president and 25, when a lone terrorist, pur- Yitzhak Ahronovitch, a’h founder of ISS Action, Inc., and portedly a functionary of Al Rabbi Yair Hoffman 75 speaks from two decades of Qaeda, attempted to set off extensive experience with air- explosive materials on an airlin- line security. er approaching Detroit’s interna- The ISS offices are located at tional airport. The terrorist JFK Airport, and the company passed through screeners at air- Howard Kopel, the first Orthodox Jew elected to the Nassau County Legislature since its inception in 1996, being sworn in on Monday at the employs more than 150 people ports in both Nigeria and Cradle of Aviation Museum by U.S. Congressman Peter King as Mr. Kopel and provides security consult- began his term as a member of the new Republican majority. ants to scores of airlines around Continued on Page 15 See Page 61 HEARD IN THE BAGEL STORE Shidduchim:Letters Not So Fast to thewith length Editor of courtship, logic Dear Editor, would have us insist that a cou- Where The Time Goes Welcome to the shidduch ple really get to know each other Bat Mitzvah of Ayala scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Pachad David on the Torah Part II
    Excerpt from the book PACHAD DAVID PART TWO Bereshit • Shemot Rabbi David Hanania Pinto ’’ Grandson of venerable and holy Rabbi Chaim Pinto Zatsal Translated by Mr Jeff Soussana New York 13th of Sivan 5778 Chevrat Pinto Institutions The Kollel of Lyon The Kollel of Dayanut The Kollel of Guemara Hevrat Pinto Ohr Haim Ve Moshe Pachad David Beith Ha-Midrash Beith Ha-Midrash The Kollel Yeshivat Chevrat Pinto Chevrat Pinto Orot Chaim U-Moshe Torat David Kollel for Kollel Kollel Baalei Batim Pninei David Kol Chaim Rehov Ha’ahouza 98 Ra’anana • Israël Tel: +972 98 828 078 +972 58 792 9003 [email protected] Translation Mr. Jeff Soussana Editions Chevrat Pinto 207 West 78th Street - New York NY 10024 Tel.: 1 212 721 0230 - e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hevratpinto.org Offered Graciously - Not for Sale 3 BERESHIT Contents Bereshith.....................................................................................................................10 “Distance Yourself From Evil and Do Good” – And Only Good!..........................................................................10 The Infinite Wisdom of the Torah ...........................................................................................................................12 There Is no End to the Holy Torah ..........................................................................................................................14 .Humility Is an Absolute Prerequisite for Observing Torah ...................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Judah: 18. Temple Interior and Dedication
    Associates for Scriptural Knowledge • P.O. Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298-0990 USA © ASK, March 2019 • All rights reserved • Number 3/19 Telephone: 503 292 4352 • Internet: www.askelm.com • E-Mail: [email protected] How the Siege of Titus Locates the Temple Mount in the City of David by Marilyn Sams, July 2016 Formatted and annotated by David Sielaff, March 2019 This detailed research paper by independent author Marilyn Sams is one of several to follow her 2015 book, The Jerusalem Temple Mount Myth. Her book was inspired by a desire to prove (or disprove) Dr. Ernest Martin’s research in The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot. Ms. Sams wrote a second book in 2017, The Jerusalem Temple Mount: A Compendium of Ancient Descriptions expanding the argument in her first book, itemizing and analyzing 375 ancient descriptions of the Temple, Fort Antonia, and environs, all confirming a Gihon location for God’s Temples.1 Her books and articles greatly advance Dr. Martin’s arguments. David Sielaff, ASK Editor Marilyn Sams: The siege of Titus has been the subject of many books and papers, but always from the false perspective of the Jerusalem Temple Mount’s misidentification.2 The purpose of this paper is to illuminate additional aspects of the siege, in order to show how they cannot reasonably be applied to the current models of the temple and Fort Antonia, but can when the “Temple Mount” is identified as Fort Antonia. Conflicts Between the Rebellious Leaders Prior to the Siege of Titus A clarification of the definition of “Acra” is crucial to understanding the conflicts between John of Gischala and Simon of Giora, two of the rebellious [Jewish] faction leaders, who divided parts of Jerusalem 1 Her second book shows the impossibility of the so-called “Temple Mount” and demonstrate the necessity of a Gihon site of the Temples.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You Answer These Questions?
    SERIES XV LECTURE IX c"qa CAN YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS? 1. Describe the events that occurred immediately after the death of Joshua and the elders. 2. Describe the three ways in which the people of Israel were punished during the period of the Judges. 3. Describe five aspects which were common to both the Judges and the Kings of Israel. 4. Describe five aspects which distinguished the Judges from the Kings of Israel. 5. Who was the first of the Judges? This and much more will be addressed in the ninth lecture of this series: "The Period of the Judges: Part One". To derive maximum benefit from this lecture, keep these questions in mind as you listen to the lecture and read through the outline. Go back to these questions once again at the end of the lecture and see how well you answer them. PLEASE NOTE: This outline and source book were designed as a powerful tool to help you appreciate and understand the basis of Jewish History. Although the lectures can be listened to without the use of the outline, we advise you to read the outline to enhance your comprehension. Use it, as well, as a handy reference guide and for quick review. This lecture is dedicated to the honor and merit of Dr. and Mrs. Gabriel Sosne and their family. THE EPIC OF THE ETERNAL PEOPLE Presented by Rabbi Shmuel Irons Series XV Lecture #9 THE PERIOD OF THE JUDGES: PART ONE I. The Emergence of the Judges A. lM¨ z`¥ E`x¨ xW¤ `£ r© EWFdi§ ix¥g£`© min¦ i¨ Ekix¦`¡d¤ xW¤ `£ mip¦ w¥ G§d© in¥ i§ | loke§ r© Wª Fdi§ in¥ i§ loM 'c z`¤ mr¨ d¨ Eca§ r© I©e© FzF` ExA§ w§ I¦e© :mip¦
    [Show full text]
  • Buy Cheap Levitra
    Excavating a Battle: The Intersection of Textual Criticism, Archaeology, and Geography The Problem of Hill City Just as similarities or variant forms of personal names can create textual problems, the same .( ֶּ֖ג ַבע) and Geba (גִּבְע ָ֔ ה) is true of geographic names. A case in point is the confusion of Gibeah Both names mean “Hill City”, an appropriate name for a city in the hill country of Benjamin, where other cities are named Lookout (Mizpeh) and Height (Ramah). Adding to the mix is the The situation is clarified (or confused further) by the modifiers that .( ִּג ְב ֥עֹון) related name Gibeon are sometimes added to the names. The difficulty of keeping these cities distinct is increased by textual problems. Sometimes “Geba” may be used for “Gibeah,” and vice versa. To complicate matters further there are other Gibeah/Geba’s in Israel (Joshua 15:57—Gibeah in Judah, Joshua 24:33 —Gibeath in Ephraim). That Gibeah and Geba in Benjamin are two different places is demonstrated by Joshua 18:24, 28, which lists ( ִּג ְב ַַ֣עת and Gibeah (here in the form ( ֶּ֖ג ַבע) both Geba among the cities of Benjamin. Isaiah 10:29 also The Gibeah we are discussing here is near .( ִּג ְב ַ֥עת ש ֶּ֖אּול) distinguishes Geba from Gibeah of Saul the central ridge, near Ramah, north of Jerusalem. Geba is further east on the edge of the wilderness, near a descent to the Jordan Valley. It is across the valley from Michmash. Gibeah Gibeah is Saul’s capital near Ramah. It is a restoration of the Gibeah destroyed in Judges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hashemite Custodianship of Jerusalem's Islamic and Christian
    THE HASHEMITE CUSTODIANSHIP OF JERUSALEM’S ISLAMIC AND CHRISTIAN HOLY SITES 1917–2020 CE White Paper The Royal Aal Al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought THE HASHEMITE CUSTODIANSHIP OF JERUSALEM’S ISLAMIC AND CHRISTIAN HOLY SITES 1917–2020 CE White Paper The Royal Aal Al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought THE HASHEMITE CUSTODIANSHIP OF JERUSALEM’S ISLAMIC AND CHRISTIAN HOLY SITES 1917–2020 CE Copyright © 2020 by The Royal Aal Al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought All rights reserved. No part of this document may be used or reproduced in any manner wthout the prior consent of the publisher. Cover Image: Dome of the Rock, Jerusalem © Shutterstock Title Page Image: Dome of the Rock and Jerusalem © Shutterstock isbn 978–9957–635–47–3 Printed in Jordan by The National Press Third print run CONTENTS ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION: THE HASHEMITE CUSTODIANSHIP OF THE HOLY SITES IN JERUSALEM 7 PART ONE: THE ARAB, JEWISH, CHRISTIAN AND ISLAMIC HISTORY OF JERUSALEM IN BRIEF 9 PART TWO: THE CUSTODIANSHIP OF THE ISLAMIC HOLY SITES IN JERUSALEM 23 I. The Religious Significance of Jerusalem and its Holy Sites to Muslims 25 II. What is Meant by the ‘Islamic Holy Sites’ of Jerusalem? 30 III. The Significance of the Custodianship of Jerusalem’s Islamic Holy Sites 32 IV. The History of the Hashemite Custodianship of Jerusalem’s Islamic Holy Sites 33 V. The Functions of the Custodianship of Jerusalem’s Islamic Holy Sites 44 VI. Termination of the Islamic Custodianship 53 PART THREE: THE CUSTODIANSHIP OF THE CHRISTIAN HOLY SITES IN JERUSALEM 55 I. The Religious Significance of Jerusalem and its Holy Sites to Christians 57 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Sifting Antiquity on the Temple Mount Sifting Project Temple Mount Sifting Project Investigates Temple Mount Soil
    Sifting Antiquity on the Temple Mount Sifting Project Temple Mount Sifting Project investigates Temple Mount soil Sacred to Jews, Christians and Muslims, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is today a contested site. Archaeological excavations are not allowed here, though one project—the Temple Mount Sifting Project—has been analyzing soil that came from the Temple Mount since 2004. Preserved as a nearly rectangular man-made platform, the Temple Mount stretches 36 acres—equivalent to about 28 football fields. Located in the current Old City of Jerusalem, the site was where King Solomon built the First Temple in the 10th century B.C.E., where the Second Temple was erected in Aerial view of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. 516 B.C.E., and where King Herod rebuilt the Temple and Photo: Andrew Shiva’s photo is licensed under expanded the Temple Mount in 19 B.C.E. The Temple Mount CC-BY-SA 3.0. is the holiest site in Judaism. The Temple Mount has been a Christian pilgrimage site since at least the fourth century C.E., when the Pilgrim of Bordeaux chronicled his journey through the Holy Land. The Jerusalem Temple is referenced several time in the New Testament—it is where Jesus drove out merchants and overturned the money-changers’ tables to cleanse the Temple (Mark 11:15–19; Matthew 21:12–17; Luke 19:45– 48). At the southern end of the Temple Mount (Arabic: Haram al-Sharif, or “Noble Sanctuary”) sits al-Aqsa Mosque (“the farthest mosque”)—the third holiest site in Islam—where in Islamic tradition the prophet Muhammad was transported from Mecca on the Night Journey, and at the center of the Temple Mount is the Dome of the Rock, a gold-domed shrine commemorating the site where Muhammad ascended to heaven (Sura 17:1).
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 2019 International Religious Freedom Report
    ISRAEL 2019 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary This section covers Israel, including Jerusalem. In December 2017, the United States recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. It is the position of the United States that the specific boundaries of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem are subject to final status negotiations between the parties. The Palestinian Authority (PA) exercises no authority over Jerusalem. In March 2019, the United States recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. A report on the West Bank and Gaza, including areas subject to the jurisdiction of the PA, is appended at the end of this report. The country’s laws and Supreme Court rulings protect the freedoms of conscience, faith, religion, and worship, regardless of an individual’s religious affiliation, and the 1992 “Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty” protects additional individual rights. In 2018, the Knesset passed the “Basic Law: Israel – The Nation State of the Jewish People.” According to the government, that “law determines, among other things, that the Land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people; the State of Israel is the nation state of the Jewish People, in which it realizes its natural, cultural, religious and historical right to self-determination; and exercising the right to national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish People.” The government continued to allow controlled access to religious sites, including the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif (the site containing the foundation of the first and second Jewish temple and the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa Mosque).
    [Show full text]
  • Walking in the Footsteps of Jesus “Walking with Jesus Every Day” Sermon Preached by Jeff Huber April 6-7, 2013 at First United Methodist Church - Durango
    THEME: The Way: Walking in the Footsteps of Jesus “Walking With Jesus Every Day” Sermon preached by Jeff Huber April 6-7, 2013 at First United Methodist Church - Durango Luke 24: 28-34 28 By this time they were nearing Emmaus and the end of their journey. Jesus acted as if he were going on, 29 but they begged him, “Stay the night with us, since it is getting late.” So he went home with them. 30 As they sat down to eat, he took the bread and blessed it. Then he broke it and gave it to them. 31 Suddenly, their eyes were opened, and they recognized him. And at that moment he disappeared! 32 They said to each other, “Didn’t our hearts burn within us as he talked with us on the road and explained the Scriptures to us?” 33 And within the hour they were on their way back to Jerusalem. There they found the eleven disciples and the others who had gathered with them, 34 who said, “The Lord has really risen! He appeared to Peter.” VIDEO Walking with Jesus Every Day Sermon Starter SLIDE Walking with Jesus Every Day (Use The Way background) Today we conclude our series of sermons on The Way: Walking in the Footsteps of Jesus. I invite you to take out of your bulletin your Message Notes and your Meditation Moments. The Message Notes have our Scripture passage listed at the top of them and then below that you will find some space to take notes and my hope is that you might hear something today that you would want to remember and you would write that down.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple Mount in the Herodian Period (37 BC–70 A.D.)
    The Temple Mount in the Herodian Period (37 BC–70 A.D.) Leen Ritmeyer • 08/03/2018 This post was originally published on Leen Ritmeyer’s website Ritmeyer Archaeological Design. It has been republished with permission. Visit the website to learn more about the history of the Temple Mount and follow Ritmeyer Archaeological Design on Facebook. Following on from our previous drawing, the Temple Mount during the Hellenistic and Hasmonean periods, we now examine the Temple Mount during the Herodian period. This was, of course, the Temple that is mentioned in the New Testament. Herod extended the Hasmonean Temple Mount in three directions: north, west and south. At the northwest corner he built the Antonia Fortress and in the south, the magnificent Royal Stoa. In 19 B.C. the master-builder, King Herod the Great, began the most ambitious building project of his life—the rebuilding of the Temple and the Temple Mount in lavish style. To facilitate this, he undertook a further expansion of the Hasmonean Temple Mount by extending it on three sides, to the north, west and south. Today’s Temple Mount boundaries still reflect this enlargement. The cutaway drawing below allows us to recap on the development of the Temple Mount so far: King Solomon built the First Temple on the top of Mount Moriah which is visible in the center of this drawing. This mountain top can be seen today, inside the Islamic Dome of the Rock. King Hezekiah built a square Temple Mount (yellow walls) around the site of the Temple, which he also renewed.
    [Show full text]