DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical & Financial File Sustainable Agriculture Kigoma Regional Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical & Financial File Sustainable Agriculture Kigoma Regional Project TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL FILE SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE KIGOMA REGIONAL PROJECT (SAKIRP) TANZANIA DGD CODE : 30 164 73 NAVISION CODE : TAN 14 031 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXES ............................................................................ 4 ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 8 ANALYTICAL RECORD OF THE INTERVENTION ................................................................. 10 1 SITUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................. 11 1.1 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL SECTOR POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 11 1.2 KIGOMA REGIONAL PROFILE ......................................................................................................... 13 1.3 ANALYSIS OF THE RELEVANT AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY CHAINS IN KIGOMA REGION ............................ 15 1.4 ASSESSMENT OF CHAIN ACTORS .................................................................................................. 26 1.5 ASSESSMENT OF CHAIN SUPPORTERS .......................................................................................... 33 1.6 MAIN DONOR FUNDED PROJECTS .................................................................................................. 37 2 STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES ................................................ 39 2.1 STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS ........................................................................................................... 39 2.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................... 41 2.3 GEOGRAPHICAL COVERAGE OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................... 44 3 INTERVENTION FRAMEWORK ................................................................................... 45 3.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................... 45 3.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................... 45 3.3 EXPECTED RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 45 3.4 ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................................. 48 3.5 INDICATORS AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION .................................................................................... 78 3.6 DESCRIPTION OF BENEFICIARIES .................................................................................................. 78 3.7 RISK ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 80 4 RESOURCES .......................................................................................................... 82 4.1 FINANCIAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 82 4.2 HUMAN RESOURCES .................................................................................................................... 85 4.3 OTHER RESOURCES .................................................................................................................... 86 5 IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES................................................................................ 89 5.1 CONTRACTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 89 5.2 INSTITUTIONAL ANCHORAGE ........................................................................................................ 89 5.3 TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................... 89 5.4 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE .................................................................................................................. 89 TFF SAKIRP (TAN 14 031 11) version for final SC 2 5.5 STEERING AND IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURES ............................................................................. 92 5.6 OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 99 5.7 TFF MODIFICATIONS .................................................................................................................. 105 6 CROSS CUTTING THEMES ...................................................................................... 107 6.1 ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE ......................................................................................... 107 6.2 GENDER ................................................................................................................................... 108 6.3 HIV/AIDS ................................................................................................................................. 111 6.4 SOCIAL ECONOMY ..................................................................................................................... 112 6.5 CHILDREN’S RIGHTS .................................................................................................................. 112 7 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................ 113 7.1 ANNEX 1: LOGICAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 113 7.2 ANNEX 2: IMPLEMENTATION CALENDAR .................................................................................... 118 7.3 ANNEX 3: CHRONOGRAM ......................................................................................................... 119 7.4 ANNEX 4: TOR LONG-TERM PERSONNEL ................................................................................... 121 7.5 ANNEX 5: TOR FOR THE BASELINE STUDY ................................................................................. 133 7.6 ANNEX 6: PRELIMINARY ELEMENTS FOR THE MARKET SURVEY ................................................... 137 7.7 ANNEX 7: POSSIBLE PROJECT PARTNERS AND THEIR FIELD OF EXPERTISE .................................. 140 7.8 ANNEX 8: POSSIBLE SYNERGIES BETWEEN BE-TAN INTERVENTIONS ......................................... 141 TFF SAKIRP (TAN 14 031 11) version for final SC 3 LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXES Table 1: Ranking of the 6 crops in Kigoma according to 5 criteria 16 Table 2: Comparison of the 6 crops according to 5 criteria 17 Table 3: Comparison of the main supply chains in Kigoma region 18 Table 4 : Prelimibary overview of cassava market 21 Table 5: Preliminary overview of the beans market 25 Table 6: List of some local service providers along the value chains (non exhaustive) 36 Table 7: Example of financial needs of chain actors 58 Table 8: Possible actions for a value chain development strategy (purely indicative at this stage) 69 Table 9: Contracts outsourced to support project implementation 87 Figure 1: Preliminary cassava supply chain mapping (from the cassava supply chain workshop) 22 Figure 2: Preliminary beans supply chain mapping (from the beans supply chain workshop) 24 Figure 3: Map of Kigoma region 44 Figure 4: 5 results cover value chain actors, value chain supporters and the value chain context 46 Figure 5: Logical sequence of activities 49 Figure 6: Proposed process for value chain development 50 Figure 7: Organogram SAKIRP 95 Box 1: The specific issues of cross border trade .................................................................................. 15 Box 2 : Definitions of the main concepts used in this TFF regarding value chain development (Source: «Chain empowerment: supporting African farmers to develop markets», KIT, FAIDA, IIRR, 2006) .... 15 Box 3: Presentation of MWIVATA, the Tanzanian national farmers' network ....................................... 27 Box 4: MUCCoBS in Tanzania and Kigoma .......................................................................................... 29 Box 5: Presentation of the PASS private agriculture sector support ..................................................... 34 Box 6: Some reflections on possible alternatives to value chain approach .......................................... 39 Box 7: Justification for selecting only two value chains ......................................................................... 40 Box 8: How demand imposes choices on the value chain .................................................................... 42 Box 9: Value chain mapping .................................................................................................................. 52 Box 10: Type of platforms which may be supported by the project ...................................................... 55 Box 11: Main types of chain supporters ................................................................................................ 65 Box 12: Possible elements of vertical and horizontal integration .......................................................... 70 Box 13: Faida Mali market linkage approach .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture Guideline Involved a Number of Individuals Who Worked Determinedly to Ensure That the Preparation Was a Success
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE LIVESTOCK AND FISHERIES CLIMATE - SMART AGRICULTURE GUIDELINE May, 2017 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgement .................................................................................................................................... vi Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture .................................................................................................................2 1.2 Agriculture Impacts on Climate Change .................................................................................................................2 1.3 Adaptation and Mitigation in Agriculture ................................................................................................................4 1.4 Climate-Smart Agriculture ..........................................................................................................................................5 1.4.1 Gender, Youth and Climate-Smart Agriculture ............................................................................................5 1.5 Policy
    [Show full text]
  • Appeals 11 2016 -Scale-Up-Support-To-Burundian-Refugees-In-Tanzania
    Appeal Tanzania Scale Up Emergency Response to Burundian refugee crisis in Tanzania – TZA161 Appeal Target: US$ 2,998,470 Balance Requested: US$ 2,998,470 Nairobi, November 16 2016 Dear Colleagues, Now more than a year since Burundi’s current crisis began, more than 160,000 men, women and children remain in refugee camps in Tanzania and are unable to return home. The situation inside Burundi continues to worsen. A low intensity urban conflict is spreading progressively from Bujumbura to other provinces, resulting in targeted assassinations, torture, harassments and abuses.1 Coupled with an economic collapse brought on by the conflict, this makes it virtually impossible for displaced Burundians to return home safely. Hundreds of refugees from Burundi are still entering in Tanzania every day while 140,448 Burundian refugees are currently living in Nyarugusu, Nduta and Mtendeli camps in Kigoma region. As many informants from UNHCR, INGOs and refugee leaders suggest, a quick solution to the current political crisis in Burundi and the short-term repatriation of refugees are unlikely. The current refugee situation is developing into a protracted crisis that will plausibly last for several years. The likely scenario of an extended presence in Tanzania is changing and increasing the needs of the refugees. Basic requirements need to be provided ensuring a comprehensive long term self-reliance strategy. Given the likelihood that the refugee crisis is becoming protracted, this must be done in ways that also promote social cohesion among refugees and their Tanzanian neighbours, as well as recently arrived Burundians and long-staying refugees who had fled other regional conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • 16-UF-TZA-18470-NR03 United Republic of Tanzania RCHC.Report
    Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the use of CERF funds RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA UNDERFUNDED EMERGENCIES ROUND 1 2016 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Alvaro Rodriguez REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY Tip! Prepare this section as the last part of the reporting process. a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. The AAR was held in conjunction with the Refugee Coordination meeting in Dar es Salaam on the 9th February 2017. The participants included: UNHCR, IOM, UNICEF, WFP, Save the Children, MSF, Oxfam, TWESA, NRC, DRC, CEMEDO, RESEO, TRCS, Water Mission, Asylum Access, ADRA, ICRC, Plan International. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO The report was prepared by the sector coordinators, in consultation with participating agencies and partners. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO The report was shared with the implementing partners to the Refugee Response operations, goving them an opportunity to provide input to the final draft. I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION
    [Show full text]
  • Burundian Refugees in Western Tanzania, It Can Be Expected That Such Activities Would Take Place
    BURUNDIAN REFUGEES IN TANZANIA: The Key Factor to the Burundi Peace Process ICG Central Africa Report N° 12 30 November 1999 PROLOGUE The following report was originally issued by the International Crisis Group (ICG) as an internal paper and distributed on a restricted basis in February 1999. It incorporates the results of field research conducted by an ICG analyst in and around the refugee camps of western Tanzania during the last three months of 1998. While the situation in Central Africa has evolved since the report was first issued, we believe that the main thrust of the analysis presented remains as valid today as ever. Indeed, recent events, including the killing of UN workers in Burundi and the deteriorating security situation there, only underscore the need for greater attention to be devoted to addressing the region’s unsolved refugee problem. With this in mind, we have decided to reissue the report and give it a wider circulation, in the hope that the information and arguments that follow will help raise awareness of this important problem and stimulate debate on the best way forward. International Crisis Group Nairobi 30 November 1999 Table of Contents PROLOGUE .......................................................................................................................................... I I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 II. REFUGEE FLOWS INTO TANZANIA.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kigoma Airport
    The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment July 2008 In Association With : Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Ltd Belva Consult Limited Corinthian House, PO Box 7521, Mikocheni Area, 17 Lansdowne Road, Croydon, Rose Garden Road, Plot No 455, United Kingdom CR0 2BX, UK Dar es Salaam Tel: +44(02) 08604 8999 Tel: +255 22 2120447 Fax: +44 (02)0 8604 8877 Email: [email protected] Fax: +255 22 2120448 Web Site: www.fsnow.co.uk Email: [email protected] The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by Sir Frederick Snow and Partners Limited in association with Belva Consult Limited Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0 July 08 Belva KC Preliminary Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Airports Authority is undertaking a feasibility study and detailed engineering design for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Kigoma airport, located in Kigoma-Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma region. The project is part of a larger project being undertaken by the Tanzania Airport Authority involving rehabilitation and upgrading of high priority commercial airports across the country. The Tanzania Airport Authority has commissioned two companies M/S Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Limited of UK in association with Belva Consult Limited of Tanzania to undertake a Feasibility Study, Detail Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments of seven airports namely Arusha, Bukoba, Kigoma, Tabora, Mafia Island, Shinyanga and Sumbawanga.
    [Show full text]
  • October 29, 2019 Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF 44.8MW MALAGARASI HPP AND ASSOCIATED 132KV TRANSMISSION LINE FROM MALAGARASI HYDROPOWER PLANT TO KIGOMA 400/132/33KV SUBSTATION AT KIDAHWE KIGOMA OCTOBER 29, 2019 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED 1 PROJECT TITLE: MALAGARASI 45MW HYDRO POWER PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: P-TZ-FAB-004 COUNTRY: TANZANIA CATEGORY: 1 Sector: PICU Project Category: 1 2 1. TABLE CONTENTS 1. TABLE CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 5. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................................... 6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE ............................................................................................................................ 7 7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Referral Transit Time Between Sending and First-Line Receiving Health Facilities: a Geographical Analysis in Tanzania
    Research BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001568 on 17 August 2019. Downloaded from Referral transit time between sending and first-line receiving health facilities: a geographical analysis in Tanzania Michelle M Schmitz, 1 Florina Serbanescu,1 George E Arnott,1 Michelle Dynes,1 Paul Chaote,2 Abdulaziz Ally Msuya,3 Yi No Chen1 To cite: Schmitz MM, ABSTRACT Summary box Serbanescu F, Arnott GE, Background Timely, high-quality obstetric services et al. Referral transit time are vital to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. We What is already known? between sending and first- spatially modelled referral pathways between sending line receiving health facilities: Strengthening obstetric inter-facility referral sys- and receiving health facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, ► a geographical analysis in tems in developing countries, including reducing de- identifying communication and transportation delays to Tanzania. BMJ Global Health lays due to inadequate transportation and unreliable timely care and inefficient links within the referral system. 2019;4:e001568. doi:10.1136/ communication, increases access to timely, appro- Methods We linked sending and receiving facilities to bmjgh-2019-001568 priate obstetric and neonatal care. form facility pairs, based on information from a 2016 Handling editor Seye Abimbola Health Facility Assessment. We used an AccessMod cost- What are the new findings? friction surface model, incorporating road classifications ► About 57.8% of facility pairs in Kigoma did not refer Additional material is ► and speed limits, to estimate direct travel time between to facilities providing higher levels of care. published online only. To facilities in each pair. We adjusted for transportation view please visit the journal ► When accounting for communication and transpor- online (http:// dx.
    [Show full text]
  • L'origine De La Scission Au Sein U CNDD-FDD
    AFRICA Briefing Nairobi/Brussels, 6 August 2002 THE BURUNDI REBELLION AND THE CEASEFIRE NEGOTIATIONS I. OVERVIEW Domitien Ndayizeye, but there is a risk this will not happen if a ceasefire is not agreed soon. This would almost certainly collapse the entire Arusha Prospects are still weak for a ceasefire agreement in framework. FRODEBU – Buyoya’s transition Burundi that includes all rebel factions. Despite the partner and the main Hutu political party – would Arusha agreement in August 2000 and installation have to concede the Hutu rebels’ chief criticism, of a transition government on 1 November 2001, the that it could not deliver on the political promises it warring parties, the Burundi army and the various made in signing Arusha. The fractious coalition factions of the Party for the Liberation of the Hutu would appear a toothless partner in a flawed People/National Liberation Forces (PALIPEHUTU- power-sharing deal with a government that had no FNL) and of the National Council for the Defense intention of reforming. All this would likely lead to of Democracy/Defense Forces of Democracy escalation rather than an end to fighting. (CNDD-FDD), are still fighting. Neither side has been able to gain a decisive military advantage, This briefing paper provides information about although the army recently claimed several and a context for understanding the rebel factions, important victories. whose history, objectives and internal politics are little known outside Burundi. It analyses their A ceasefire – the missing element in the Arusha dynamics, operational situations and negotiating framework – has been elusive despite on-going positions and is a product of extensive field activity by the South African facilitation team to research conducted in Tanzania and in Burundi, initiate joint and separate talks with the rebels.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Refugee Situation Public Health and Nutrition Strategy
    Tanzania Refugee Situation Public Health and Nutrition Strategy 2016 - 2018 Tanzania Refugee Situation PHN Strategy, 2016-2018 1 | P a g e CONTENTS Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................................. 3 Health System and Services in Tanzania ................................................................................................................. 5 Overview of health services in Tanzania Refugee Program .................................................................................... 6 Guiding principles ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Strategic Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Strengthen public health & nutrition coordination and collaboration at all levels .............................................. 11 A. Ensure regular and effective public health & nutrition coordination .................................................... 11 B. Increase efficiency through integration of services ............................................................................... 12 Ensure integrated service delivery towards quality, equitable and sustainable access to essential primary health care ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Center for Research Libraries Scans to Provide Digital Delivery of Its Holdings. in the Center for Research Libraries Scans
    The Center for Research Libraries scans to provide digital delivery of its holdings. In The Center for Research Libraries scans to provide digital delivery of its holdings. In some cases problems with the quality of the original document or microfilm reproduction may result in a lower quality scan, but it will be legible. In some cases pages may be damaged or missing. Files include OCR (machine searchable text) when the quality of the scan and the language or format of the text allows. If preferred, you may request a loan by contacting Center for Research Libraries through your Interlibrary Loan Office. Rights and usage Materials digitized by the Center for Research Libraries are intended for the personal educational and research use of students, scholars, and other researchers of the CRL member community. Copyrighted images and texts are not to be reproduced, displayed, distributed, broadcast, or downloaded for other purposes without the expressed, written permission of the Center for Research Libraries. © Center for Research Libraries Scan Date: December 27, 2007 Identifier: m-n-000128 fl7, THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES DIVISION Guide to The Microfilms of Regional and District Books 1973 PRINTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, DAR ES SALAAMs,-TANZANA. Price: S&. 6152 MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES DIVISION Guide to The Microfilms of Regional and District Books vn CONTENTS. Introduction ... .... ... ... ... History of Regional Administration .... ... District Books and their Subject Headings ... THE GUIDE: Arusha Region ... ... ... Coast Region ............... ... Dodoma Region .. ... ... ... Iringa Region ............... ... Kigoma ... ... ... ... ... Kilimanjaro Region .... .... .... ... Mara Region .... .... .... .... ... Mbeya Region ... ... ... ... Morogoro Region ... ... ... ... Mtwara Region ... ... Mwanza Region ..
    [Show full text]
  • Sunflower Value Chain Analysis Report for Dodoma Urban, Kongwa and Kasulu Districts
    LOCAL INVESTMENT CLIMATE PROJECT SUNFLOWER VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS REPORT FOR DODOMA URBAN, KONGWA AND KASULU DISTRICTS FINAL DRAFT CONDUCTED BY MRA Management Associates With contributions from: Charles Ogutu, Sunga Mabeja, Dr. Victor George, Cliff Laizer, James Genga, Alice Muro and Onesmo Kenneth Final Draft Sunflower Value Chain Analysis submitted to LIC-Confidential TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 9 3 AN OVERVIEW OF KASULU DISTRICT COUNCIL ..................................................................... 10 4. OVERVIEW OF KONGWA DISTRICT COUNCIL ........................................................................ 12 5. OVERVIEW OF DODOMA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .................................................................... 13 6. OVER VIEW -OILSEEDS ......................................................................................................... 15 6.1 World market prices for edible oil CIF Dar es Salaam for the last 5 years ........................... 16 6.2 Tanzania Oil Seed production ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]