Referral Transit Time Between Sending and First-Line Receiving Health Facilities: a Geographical Analysis in Tanzania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Referral Transit Time Between Sending and First-Line Receiving Health Facilities: a Geographical Analysis in Tanzania Research Referral transit time between sending and first-line receiving health facilities: a geographical analysis in Tanzania Michelle M Schmitz, 1 Florina Serbanescu,1 George E Arnott,1 Michelle Dynes,1 Paul Chaote,2 Abdulaziz Ally Msuya,3 Yi No Chen1 To cite: Schmitz MM, ABSTRACT Summary box Serbanescu F, Arnott GE, Background Timely, high-quality obstetric services et al. Referral transit time are vital to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. We What is already known? between sending and first- spatially modelled referral pathways between sending line receiving health facilities: Strengthening obstetric inter-facility referral sys- and receiving health facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, ► a geographical analysis in tems in developing countries, including reducing de- identifying communication and transportation delays to Tanzania. BMJ Global Health lays due to inadequate transportation and unreliable timely care and inefficient links within the referral system. 2019;4:e001568. doi:10.1136/ communication, increases access to timely, appro- Methods We linked sending and receiving facilities to bmjgh-2019-001568 priate obstetric and neonatal care. form facility pairs, based on information from a 2016 Handling editor Seye Abimbola Health Facility Assessment. We used an AccessMod cost- What are the new findings? friction surface model, incorporating road classifications ► About 57.8% of facility pairs in Kigoma did not refer Additional material is ► and speed limits, to estimate direct travel time between to facilities providing higher levels of care. published online only. To facilities in each pair. We adjusted for transportation view please visit the journal ► When accounting for communication and transpor- online (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. and communications delays to create a total travel time, tation delays, only 47.5% of the facility pairs have 1136bmjgh- 2019- 001568) simulating the effects of documented barriers in this an estimated overall referral transit times below 2 referral system. hours. Results More than half of the facility pairs (57.8%) did not Received 19 March 2019 refer patients to facilities with higher levels of emergency What do the new findings imply? Revised 21 May 2019 obstetric care. The median direct travel time was 25.9 min ► Interventions for reducing referral transit times Accepted 8 June 2019 (range: 4.4–356.6), while the median total time was in Kigoma could include increasing the number 106.7 min (22.9–371.6) at the moderate adjustment level. of ambulances, developing an ambulance dis- Total travel times for 30.7% of facility pairs exceeded patch system and improving radio and ambulance 2 hours. All facility pairs required some adjustments for communications. transportation and communication delays, with 94.0% of ► Combining cost-friction surface modelling with field- facility pairs’ total times increasing. work data provides stakeholders with a better un- Conclusion Half of all referral pairs in Kigoma Region derstanding of their healthcare referral system. have travel time delays nearly exceeding 1 hour, and facility pairs referring to facilities providing higher levels of care also have large travel time delays. Combining care facilities to obtain emergency obstetric cost-friction surface modelling estimates with documented © Author(s) (or their transportation and communications barriers provides a and neonatal care (EmONC) at higher-level employer(s)) 2019. Re-use more realistic assessment of the effects of inter-facility facilities if life-threatening complications permitted under CC BY-NC. No occur.9 Within the Three Delays Model commercial re-use. See rights delays on referral networks, and can inform decision- and permissions. Published by making and potential solutions in referral systems within of maternal mortality, the efficiency of a BMJ. resource-constrained settings. referral system affects the third delay (delay 1Division of Reproductive Health, in receiving appropriate care on arrival to Centers for Disease Control and a health facility, including time to travel Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, between facilities if the appropriate level of USA INTRODUCTION care is not available at the initial facility).10 2Kigoma Regional Medical Office, Kigoma, Tanzania, United Almost 99% of all maternal deaths, and most Efforts to improve referral systems contribute Republic of perinatal deaths, occur in low- and middle-in- to two of the United Nation’s Sustainability 1–6 3AMCA Inter-Consult Ltd, Dar come countries. Strengthening the Development Goals: Goal 3 (ensuring healthy es Salaam, Tanzania, United district-level referral system is a key govern- lives and promoting well-being) and Goal 9 Republic of ment strategy to improve maternal health in (building resilient infrastructure).11 The time- 7 8 Correspondence to Tanzania. liness of a referral process may be affected by Michelle M Schmitz; An inter-facility first-line obstetric referral the quality of the communication network MSchmitz1@ cdc. gov system allows patients delivering at primary among facilities, transportation resources, Schmitz MM, et al. BMJ Global Health 2019;4:e001568. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001568 1 BMJ Global Health and road conditions.12 Understanding the current use and existing gaps of the emergency referral system is key to expanding coverage of high-quality intrapartum services. Geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial analyses can play an important role in assessing esti- mated physical access, distance and travel time to both obstetric care and EmONC facilities.13–15 To our knowl- edge, only one study in sub-Saharan Africa has conducted spatial analyses on obstetric care referrals, taking into account existing transport and communication factors.16 Research related to developing and evaluating strategies for locally appropriate transport, communication and referral systems for obstetric emergencies has been iden- tified as a high priority by the public health and medical community and policymakers.17 We describe observed inter-facility referral patterns found in Kigoma Region overall, and by facility type or EmONC level. We assess if these pairs transported patients to higher levels of care and consider the effect of travel delays due to transportation and communication barriers on the referral network. These observations will guide regional and programmatic efforts in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the regional referral network. METHODS Study site Kigoma Region is a remote region in the western part Figure 1 Contextual map of Kigoma Region, Tanzania. of Tanzania bordering Lake Tanganyika and Burundi (figure 1). In 2012, the region had a total population of 2 Hospitals, typically referral centres for dispensaries and 127 930—of which 22% were women of reproductive age health centres, provide outpatient and inpatient care in (aged 15–49 years)—and was predominantly rural (83% various wards (eg, obstetric/gynaecological, surgical). 18 of the total population). Obstetric healthcare services are provided by the govern- More than one-quarter of Kigoma Region (27%) is ment (92.5%) and by faith-based and voluntary organi- arable/grazing land, with the remainder either as forests sations (7.5%).23 The health system is decentralised, and or bodies of water. Paved primary roads exist between district health offices (DHOs) provided administrative the main towns of Kigoma, Ujiji, Manyovu, Uvinza and and management support to facilities. Kasulu; remaining roads are packed dirt. Additionally, many communities along Lake Tanganyika are isolated Data source: Health Facility Assessment from roads, relying on boat transportation.19 We based our analyses on the 2016 Health Facility Assess- Compared with Tanzania as a whole, women in Kigoma ment (HFA) conducted in Kigoma Region by the Centers have a higher total fertility rate (6.5 births per woman for Disease Control and Prevention, AMCA Interconsult, vs 5.4 per woman), lower contraceptive use (27% vs and the Tanzanian MoH.23 The HFA assessed 174 facili- 34%) and a lower proportion of facility deliveries (60% ties providing delivery services, including all six hospitals, vs 63%).20 21 The Tanzanian Ministry of Health, Commu- all 25 health centres (excluding a health centre located nity Development, Gender, Elderly and Children—or the in a refugee camp), and 143 dispensaries (ie, 88% of all MoH—has identified Kigoma as a high-priority region dispensaries providing routine obstetric care). The HFA for health systems strengthening efforts to improve collected information on each facility’s geographical reproductive, maternal and newborn health outcomes.8 location, self-reported inter-facility referral networks for Most healthcare services in Tanzania are provided in obstetric cases, observable transportation resources (eg, public-sector health facilities: dispensaries, health centres presence of functional vehicles, drivers, fuel and vehicle and hospitals.22 Dispensaries provide primary outpatient maintenance) and communication capacity (eg, mobile care, including maternal and child health services, for phones, radios, landline telephones) for both facilities their catchment areas. Health centres, usually the first and ambulances. level of referrals from dispensaries, provide outpatient We classified facilities based on their performance of and inpatient care, and may contain operating facilities. life-saving interventions (signal functions) during the 3 2 Schmitz MM, et al. BMJ Global Health 2019;4:e001568. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001568 BMJ Global
Recommended publications
  • 16-UF-TZA-18470-NR03 United Republic of Tanzania RCHC.Report
    Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the use of CERF funds RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA UNDERFUNDED EMERGENCIES ROUND 1 2016 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Alvaro Rodriguez REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY Tip! Prepare this section as the last part of the reporting process. a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. The AAR was held in conjunction with the Refugee Coordination meeting in Dar es Salaam on the 9th February 2017. The participants included: UNHCR, IOM, UNICEF, WFP, Save the Children, MSF, Oxfam, TWESA, NRC, DRC, CEMEDO, RESEO, TRCS, Water Mission, Asylum Access, ADRA, ICRC, Plan International. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO The report was prepared by the sector coordinators, in consultation with participating agencies and partners. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO The report was shared with the implementing partners to the Refugee Response operations, goving them an opportunity to provide input to the final draft. I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION
    [Show full text]
  • October 29, 2019 Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF 44.8MW MALAGARASI HPP AND ASSOCIATED 132KV TRANSMISSION LINE FROM MALAGARASI HYDROPOWER PLANT TO KIGOMA 400/132/33KV SUBSTATION AT KIDAHWE KIGOMA OCTOBER 29, 2019 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED 1 PROJECT TITLE: MALAGARASI 45MW HYDRO POWER PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: P-TZ-FAB-004 COUNTRY: TANZANIA CATEGORY: 1 Sector: PICU Project Category: 1 2 1. TABLE CONTENTS 1. TABLE CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 5. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................................... 6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE ............................................................................................................................ 7 7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Center for Research Libraries Scans to Provide Digital Delivery of Its Holdings. in the Center for Research Libraries Scans
    The Center for Research Libraries scans to provide digital delivery of its holdings. In The Center for Research Libraries scans to provide digital delivery of its holdings. In some cases problems with the quality of the original document or microfilm reproduction may result in a lower quality scan, but it will be legible. In some cases pages may be damaged or missing. Files include OCR (machine searchable text) when the quality of the scan and the language or format of the text allows. If preferred, you may request a loan by contacting Center for Research Libraries through your Interlibrary Loan Office. Rights and usage Materials digitized by the Center for Research Libraries are intended for the personal educational and research use of students, scholars, and other researchers of the CRL member community. Copyrighted images and texts are not to be reproduced, displayed, distributed, broadcast, or downloaded for other purposes without the expressed, written permission of the Center for Research Libraries. © Center for Research Libraries Scan Date: December 27, 2007 Identifier: m-n-000128 fl7, THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES DIVISION Guide to The Microfilms of Regional and District Books 1973 PRINTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, DAR ES SALAAMs,-TANZANA. Price: S&. 6152 MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES DIVISION Guide to The Microfilms of Regional and District Books vn CONTENTS. Introduction ... .... ... ... ... History of Regional Administration .... ... District Books and their Subject Headings ... THE GUIDE: Arusha Region ... ... ... Coast Region ............... ... Dodoma Region .. ... ... ... Iringa Region ............... ... Kigoma ... ... ... ... ... Kilimanjaro Region .... .... .... ... Mara Region .... .... .... .... ... Mbeya Region ... ... ... ... Morogoro Region ... ... ... ... Mtwara Region ... ... Mwanza Region ..
    [Show full text]
  • Sunflower Value Chain Analysis Report for Dodoma Urban, Kongwa and Kasulu Districts
    LOCAL INVESTMENT CLIMATE PROJECT SUNFLOWER VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS REPORT FOR DODOMA URBAN, KONGWA AND KASULU DISTRICTS FINAL DRAFT CONDUCTED BY MRA Management Associates With contributions from: Charles Ogutu, Sunga Mabeja, Dr. Victor George, Cliff Laizer, James Genga, Alice Muro and Onesmo Kenneth Final Draft Sunflower Value Chain Analysis submitted to LIC-Confidential TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 9 3 AN OVERVIEW OF KASULU DISTRICT COUNCIL ..................................................................... 10 4. OVERVIEW OF KONGWA DISTRICT COUNCIL ........................................................................ 12 5. OVERVIEW OF DODOMA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .................................................................... 13 6. OVER VIEW -OILSEEDS ......................................................................................................... 15 6.1 World market prices for edible oil CIF Dar es Salaam for the last 5 years ........................... 16 6.2 Tanzania Oil Seed production ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KASULU – MANYOVU [300.1 Km] ROAD UPGRADE PROJECT
    Language: English Original: English PROJECT: MULTINATIONAL: RN3: RUMONGE – RUTUNGA - BUJUMBURA SECTION [77.6 km] AND KABINGO – KASULU – MANYOVU [300.1 km] ROAD UPGRADE PROJECT COUNTRIES: BURUNDI AND TANZANIA ESIA SUMMARY FOR THE PROPOSED UPGRADING OF NYAKANAZI – KASULU – MANYOVU ROAD (KASULU-KABINGO – KASULU ROAD SECTION AND KIBONDO BYPASS, 202 KM) TO BITUMEN STANDARD IN KASULU, KIBONDO AND KAKONKO DISTRICTS, KIGOMA REGION. Date: June 2018 Team Leader: J. NDIKUMWAMI, Senior Transport Engineer, PICU.1/COBI Co-Team Leader: J. B AGUMA, Principal Transport Economist, RDGE.4 P. KANYIMBO, Regional Integration Coordinator, RDGE0 Preparation Team E&S Team Members: P. HORUGAVYE, Environmental and Social Coordinator, RDGC/SNSC.0 E.B. KAHUBIRE, Social Development Officer, RDGE4 /SNSC 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania with the assistance from African Development Bank (AfDB) intends to upgrade/ construct Nyakanazi – Kasulu – Manyovu road section (291km) to bitumen Standard. The project is being implemented by East Africa Community (EAC) through Tanzania Roads Agency (TANROADS). TANROADS is an Executive Agency under the Ministry of Works, Transport, and Communication; established under the Executive Agencies Act in 2000, with the duty of maintaining and developing trunk and regional road network in Tanzania Mainland. This section will of the road upgrading will constitute widening, realignment and paving of the existing Kasulu – Kabingo Road, including Kasulu and Kibondo Town Link Roads and construction of the nonexistent Kibondo bypasss Road (27.9km) by Asphalt Concrete (AC) for both carriageway and shoulders New cross drainage structures will be constructed to replace the existing structures as they are hydraulically inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES KASULU TOWN COUNCIL COUNCIL PROFILE PREPARED BY, TOWN DIRECTORS OFFICE, P.O. BOX 475, KASULU FOREWORD Kasulu Town Council forms a part of Kigoma Region, the region that is situated at the extreme Western part of the Republic of Tanzania. Kasulu Town Council is a new Local Government Authority established with effect from 1st July, 2011 through Parliamentary letter signed in Dodoma on 19th April, 2012 under the Local Government (Urban Authorities) ACT (Cap 288). Kasulu Town Council covers total area of 878.8 Km² approximately 11.5% of the total area of District. According to 2012 Population and Housing Census the total population of Kasulu Town Council was 208,244 having an annual population growth rate of 2.4% per annum which is below national average growth rate of 2.7%. The life expectancy of people estimated to reach 52 years. In 2017 total population is approximated to 234,462. Kasulu Town Council is a land for investment found in the North -Eastern part of Kigoma Region. It is a junction with linking roads to Kibondo, Uvinza and Buhigwe districts respectively. The people of Kasulu Town Council widening the markets through International business exchange with businessmen from the Republic of Burundi. Its natural geographical position, topography, soil fertility, favorable climatic conditions with reliable infrastructures, and to date the council is electrified by thermal power of 2.5MW that makes Kasulu Town to be the best option for investors. The Council is proud of production of food crops like maize, beans, banana and cassava just to name the few, and cash crops such as coffee and sunflower.
    [Show full text]
  • KASULU DC CWIQ Survey on Poverty, Welfare and Services in Kasulu DC
    PMO-RALG KASULU DC CWIQ Survey on Poverty, Welfare and Services in Kasulu DC NOVEMBER 2006 Implemented by: EDI (Economic Development Initiatives) PO Box 393, Bukoba Tanzania Telephone and Fax: +255-(0)28-2220059 Email: [email protected] www.edi-africa.com II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was commissioned by the Prime Minister’s Office – Regional Administration and Local Governance (PMO-RALG) and implemented by EDI (Economic Development Initiatives). It is part of an effort to conduct CWIQ surveys in 34 districts across Tanzania. The project Director is Joachim De Weerdt. Field work operations are being co-coordinated by Respichius Mitti and Francis Moyo. Field supervision was in the hands of Matovu Davies, Wilson Kabito, Henry Kilapilo, Henry Lugakingira, Josephine Lugomora, George Musikula, and Neema Mwampeta. The listing team was formed by Felix Kapinga and Benjamin Kamukulu. Interviewers were Dativa Balige, Geofrey Bakari, Rukia Charles, Abbanova Gabba, George Gabriel, Jamary Idrissa, Felix James, Batista John, Gloria Joseph, Placidia Josephat, Justina Katoke, Makarius Kiyonga, Faustine Misinde, Jesca Nkonjerwa, Kamugisha Robert, Resti Simon, Pius Sosthenes, Aissa Soud, Adella Theobald, and Honoratha Wyclife. The data processing software was written by Jim Otto and Neil Chalmers. The data entry team consisted of Marystella Andrew and Alieth Mutungi, and was supervised by Thaddaeus Rweyemamu. Formatting the final document layout was in the hands of Amina Suedi. The data analysis and report writing were undertaken by, Luis Barron, Mujobu Moyo, Godius Kahyarara, Teddy Neema, John Ibembe and Victor Geofrey under the supervision of Manuel Barron. Assistance from Charles Citinka and Howard Clegg from PMO- RALG is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan (Rap) for Kasulu- Manyovu Road Section Project First Draft
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF WORKS, TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS (MoWTC) TANZANIA NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY (TANROADS HQ OFFICE) P. O. BOX 11346, Airtel House, Ali Hassan Mwinyi/Kawawa Road Junction Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. [email protected] THE PROVISION OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE NYAKANAZI-KASULU- MANYOVU/RUTUNGA-RUMONGE-BUJUMBURA ROAD Contract No. P&1/2/2/20/01 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) FOR KASULU- MANYOVU ROAD SECTION PROJECT FIRST DRAFT June, 2018 i RAP EXPERT ADDRESS: Michael Mpuya, P.O.BOX 32623, Dar es Salaam Mobile : 0783403028/ 0754403023 Email : [email protected] Expert’s Name Position/Responsibility Signature Michael Mpuya Sociologist Siège social 15 avenue du Centre CS 20538 Guyancourt 78286 SAINT-QUENTIN-EN-YVELINES France Tel: +33 (0)1 39 41 40 00 PROPONENT’S CONTACT: TANROADS HQ OFFICE P. O. BOX 11346, Airtel House, Ali Hassan Mwinyi / Kawawa Road Junction Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [email protected] ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES......................................................................................................... VI LISTS OF PLATES ........................................................................................................ VI LISTS OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... VII ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................... VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BUHIGWE DISTRICT PROFILE FOREWORD Buhigwe District
    BUHIGWE DISTRICT PROFILE FOREWORD Buhigwe District Council was established in 2012 under the Government Notice No. 73 of 2nd march 2012. It is one of 7 councils of Kigoma Region, others districts includes; Kibondo, Kigoma, Kigoma/Ujiji Municipal, Uvinza, Kasulu and Kakonko. It is located in the Western part of Kigoma Region. In the west, it is bordered by Republic of Burundi, in the East and northern part is bordered by Kasulu District Council, in the south-eastern is bordered by Congo DRC, in the southern part is bordered by Kigoma District Council. It is located in the highlands found nearby Republic of Burundi. Buhigwe District Council is among seven Local Government Authorities in Kigoma Region. It has an area of 1,700.29 square Kilometers. Administratively, it is divided into 2 Divisions; 20 Wards, 44 Villages and 188 Sub-villages. The Council has a population of 254,342 people including 120,690 males and 133,652 females as per population and household census of 2012. Its natural geographical position is characterized by topography, soil fertility, favorable climatic conditions and reliable infrastructures and soon the District will be electrified by thermal power that will make Buhigwe best option for investors. The District council is proud of production in maize, beans, banana and cassava for food crops while coffee, oil palm and ginger is considered to be cash crop and opportunity of establishing sugar cane plantation along Malagarasi River. The topographical and favorable condition found in Buhigwe may attract tourism activities. The area is characterized by attractive landscapes such as gullies and a number of valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue Studies for 8 Lgas in Kigoma
    REVENUE STUDIES FOR EIGHT LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES IN KIGOMA REGION LOCAL INVESTMENT CLIMATE (LIC) APRIL 10, 2017 Dr.Victor George Dr. Alex Kira Dr. Elia John Mr. Sunga Mabeja, Mr. Salum Ntomola, Miss Claudia Maswe Miss Jesca Kitogoro and Mr. Daudi Mwasantaja i Executive Summary This study was conducted in order to draw detailed evidence to eight Kigoma Local Government Authorities (LGAs) namely; Kigoma Municipal Council, Kigoma District Council, Uvinza District Council, Kasulu District Council, Kasulu Town Council, Buhigwe District Council, Kibondo District Council, and Kakonko District Council on the best ways of increasing revenues without creating misunderstanding with private sector. Furthermore, the study assessed existing and potential sources of revenue for these LGAs. The study employed multiple methods of data collections ranging from document reviews to Key Informant Interviews. The following were the key study findings: • The structure of collection at LGAs own sources are dominated by two channels; the LGA itself and commissioned agencies. On the first channel, the LGA uses its own staff under the Municipal Director/District Executive Director (DED) with the support of Head of Departments1 and LGA staff members. On the second channel, the LGA tend to source and commission some of the revenue channels to agencies. • Revenue Collection Trend: It was observed that collections have been rising with time across the region. However, the trend varies and is inconsistency between LGAs. The study has found that there was an increasing trend on actual revenue collection for Kakonko, Kibondo and Uvinza District Councils, while there was a decreasing trend of revenue collection for Kasulu and Kigoma District Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Country Profile Report
    i | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ i LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. vi COUNTRY FACT SHEET ................................................................................................... vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... x 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 1 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Objectives of the Report ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5. Structure of the Report ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kigoma Region Socio-Economic Profile
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS KIGOMA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AUGUST, 2016 i [Type text] Page SECTION I 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Geographical Location Kigoma Region is located in the Western part of Tanzania between latitudes 3.6 and 6.5 degrees South and longitudes 29.5 and 31.5 degrees East along the shores of Lake Tanganyika, the second deepest fresh water lake in the world. The capital municipality, which draws its name from the regional name Kigoma, has a wonderful natural beauty, nestled under the hills of the western arm of the Great Rift Valley on the edge of the Lake. In the wet season, the place is especially spectacular, with its emerald green and clear sparkling water. In the North, the region borders with Burundi and Kagera Region; it borders Shinyanga and Tabora in the East; Rukwa Region to the South and the Democratic Republic of Congo in the West. 1.2 Surface Area The total surface area of Kigoma region is 45,075 sq. km, out of this, 36,523 sq. km or 81 percent is land area while 8,552 sq. km or 19 percent is covered by water. Kigoma region surface area is about 4.8 percent of Tanzania mainland. On district basis, (as shown in Table 1) the largest proportion of the area is in Uvinza District Council followed by Kibondo District Council. Uvinza District Council covers 26.4 percent of the total regional area. The second is Kibondo District Council with 19.6 percent of the total regional area.
    [Show full text]