Merger of Molecular Genetics and Plant Cell Molecular Biology Into the Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences at the Ohio State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Merger of Molecular Genetics and Plant Cell Molecular Biology Into the Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences at the Ohio State University Strategic Plan – Merger of Molecular Genetics and Plant Cell Molecular Biology into the Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences at The Ohio State University Submitted: Dec. 1, 2008 Vision Biology has been described as the scientific discipline of the 21st century. Indeed, many of the greatest recent advances in Biology have resulted from discoveries in molecular biology and genetics utilizing model genetic organisms. Testament to this is the fact that in this decade five Nobel prizes, with profound impacts on science, technology, and clinical therapy, stemmed from discoveries made utilizing model genetic systems (2001, cell cycle; 2002, development; 2006, RNAi; 2007, ES cells; 2008, GFP). The study of fundamental problems in Biology utilizing model genetic systems is a strength of the research endeavors at OSU. However, we propose a vision here that will markedly enhance these strengths by bringing together the two main departments that utilize model genetic organisms to answer key questions in eukaryotic biology (Appendix A, Fig. 1) - Molecular Genetics (MG) and Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology (PCMB). Individually these departments share the same vision and both are independently significant forces in the teaching, service, and research missions of the Ohio State University (OSU). To effectively increase our individual strengths, we seek to merge into a single integrated department, provisionally called Genetics and Genome Sciences (GGS). This brings together nearly all of the eukaryotic model system geneticists at OSU under a single administrative and educational unit. The merged department will be of higher visibility and have a significantly higher impact, both locally and nationally, than either parent department. Life sciences at OSU is undergoing a major review which will result in targeted investment. In this strategic plan we set out why GGS is a prime department for such investment and our plans to utilize new resources. This strategic plan hinges upon recruitment of highly competitive new faculty as well as investment in current strong faculty through improved infrastructure and physical grouping of labs with a common intellectual focus. We will recruit new faculty members in forefront areas of genome sciences/systems biology and epigenetics who will complement our strengths in cell, molecular, and developmental molecular genetics. We will continue to partner with other colleges for faculty hiring to create opportunities for interdisciplinary research collaborations and funding. We will develop a new graduate program to attract the world’s best students. At the same time, we will design research training environments for undergraduate students, preparing them for 21st century careers in the biological sciences and programs to attract the finest postdoctoral scholars. We will partner with the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) to broaden recruitment and funding of undergraduate, graduate, and postdoctoral persons. In all endeavors we will strive to recruit scientists at every level from underrepresented groups. Given investment to facilitate these goals, we expect that in 5 years we will be recognized as a leading department as evidenced by significant publications, strong extramural support, and highly ranked undergraduate, graduate, and postdoctoral training programs. Introduction to the Current Molecular Genetics and PCMB Departments The Molecular Genetics (MG) department, created in 1987, is a unit that employs model systems and genetic approaches to study basic biological questions. The faculty consists of 14.35 FTE positions, which has been constant throughout the past decade (Appendix A, Fig. 1). The number of faculty members (21) exceeds the FTE number, because numerous members hold joint appointments in other units, including in the Coll. Med., Coll. Human Ecol., and Coll. Biol. Sci. (Appendix A, Table 1; Appendix G, Biosketches) - a testament to MG’s role in interdisciplinary collaborations. Despite the static number of FTEs, MG has been a leader in training an increasing number of students/scholars in molecular sciences and it has been an active participant in the cross-college interdisciplinary graduate programs. Finally, MG has maintained an excellent track record of scholarly research funded by extramural grants (Appendix A, Fig. 1). PCMB was formed in 1998 as a 10-member group with a cohesive focus on basic, modern plant molecular biology. The department hired several dynamic, high profile faculty members that have consistently published well, attracted extramural grant funding and trained students and postdoctoral associates (Appendix A, Fig. 2). However, recent retirements/resignations have left PCMB’s numbers below critical limits. Although MG and PCMB faculty members generally use different model systems, there is considerable overlap in scholarly interests. Examples are: A. Hopper (MG), Wharton (MG), and Ding (PCMB) study RNA trafficking in yeast, Drosophila, and plants, respectively; Osmani (MG) and Meier (PCMB) use proteomics to study the nuclear envelop in fungi and plants, respectively; and numerous faculty members study signal transduction pathways in systems ranging from fungi to invertebrates to plants to vertebrates (Appendix A, Figs. 3, 4). Hence, the merger into GGS will provide opportunities to synergize our scholarly overlap and strengths. The merged department will be of higher visibility and impact than either individual department. However, to achieve the level of visibility that will bring the department to the top 20 in the country, we need to: (1) update infrastructure so that investigators can continue to conduct cutting-edge studies, (2) reorganize laboratories so that those working with similar systems or using similar technology are in close physical proximity, and (3) hire new faculty in the areas of genome sciences/systems biology and epigenetics, two areas that are of great importance to our future vitality. Strategic Plan Goals 1. Merge the MG and PCMB departments to create a single unit (Genetics and Genome Sciences—GGS) with strengths in model systems molecular, cellular and developmental genetics and genome science 2. Build for future 21st century sciences in critical areas of molecular genetics at OSU o Recruit 6 faculty members in emerging and key areas of genetics – epigenetics and genome sciences/systems biology. o Build plant sciences - Recruit 2 Plant Targeted Investment in Excellence (TIE) faculty members o Recruit the finest faculty by offering attractive and competitive start-up packages and renovated space o Retain current strong faculty and research programs at OSU o Strengthen focuses of excellence in developmental and cell biological genetics o Update infrastructure for current and future research directions 3. Instill intellectual interactions between groups and promote interdisciplinary collaborations o Renovate Biological Sciences building to create areas for scientific interaction and discussion o Reorganize location of faculty with overlapping instrumentation needs/scholarship to neighboring labs o Locate new faculty, grouped by expertise, in renovated and attractive space o Foster interdisciplinary research programs by joint faculty appointments with other colleges o Create alliances with the Mathematics Biology Institute (MBI) by co-recruitment of systems biologists with the MBI TIE o Participate in the campus-wide Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (PMBB) program, furthering the goals of the Translation Plant Sciences TIE o Increase extramural support 4. Incorporate new ideas and approaches to the learning environment o Create a new GGS graduate program - Modular curriculum requiring rigorous general courses and specializations in student interest areas - Writing workshops to result in student extramural grant applications - Additional student support via partnerships with RNA center and the CCC - NetJets Training Program o Enhanced postdoctoral fellows recruitment by participation in CCC’s T32 & NetJets Training Programs o Improve undergraduate education - Courses implementing active learning approaches and using state-of-the-art technology (e.g. MG500) - Honors general genetics course with laboratory section (MG H500) - Continue to implement enquiry based laboratory exercises - Broaden education impact by offering genetics course for professionals; increased tuition income 5. Enhance diversity o Increase involvement of undergraduates from groups underrepresented in science through participation in NSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) summer program o Increase graduate students/postdoctoral scholars diversity through attractive programs and fellowships Implementation/Details of the Strategic Plan 1. Merge MG and PCMB departments. Both departments voted unanimously to merge. A subcommittee generated a document (Appendix B) describing the benefits, concerns, and strategy for this merger, which has been endorsed by the entire faculty, and we are proceeding with fulfilling the administrative requirements for the official change. With respect to administration, A. Hopper will chair the department and a vice-chair will be chosen from PCMB faculty (appropriate compensation is needed for the vice-chair). For important committees, there will be co-chairs, one from each unit, for ~3 yr to assure that both units are fully represented. Office staff are required at each of the 3 locations, but we will study whether some services can be centralized. 2. Build for future 21st century sciences in areas of molecular genetics.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Light Regime and Iba Concentration on Adventitious Rooting of an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides) Clone
    EFFECTS OF LIGHT REGIME AND IBA CONCENTRATION ON ADVENTITIOUS ROOTING OF AN EASTERN COTTONWOOD (POPULUS DELTOIDES) CLONE Alexander P. Hoffman, Joshua P. Adams, and Andrew Nelson1 Abstract—Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) has received a substantial amount of interest from in- vitro studies within the past decade. The ability to efficiently multiply the stock of established clones such as clone 110412 is a valuable asset for forest endeavors. However, a common problem encountered is initiating adventitious rooting in new micropropagation protocols. Stem segments were collected from bud-broken 1 year old clone 110412 cuttings, sterilized, and stimulated to initiate shoots. Developed shoots (~2 cm in height) were excised and placed into one of three rooting media that included indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentrations (0.5 mg/L, 1 mg/L, or 2mg/L) in full strength DKW Medium, full strength Gamborg B5 vitamins, 2 percent sucrose, 0.6 percent agar, 10 mg/L AMP, 0.2 ml/L of Fungigone. In addition to IBA concentration, cuttings were randomly assigned to light rack positions to test the effects of wide spectrum fluorescent light (100 µmol m-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), 16/8 hour photoperiod) and light emitting diode light (LED; 4:1 red-to-blue diodes, 250 µmol m-2 s-1 PAR, 16/8 hour photoperiod). After a month of exposure, there was limited rooting exhibited across treatments. However, fluorescents (3.58 ± 1.02) produced significantly better performing microcuttings (judged on morphology, visual vigor, and survival) than LEDs (2.7±0.86) (p<0.005). The high light intensity of the LEDs may be prompting weaker performance through unfavorably high transpiration-induced auxin uptake.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer A++ Viewer
    PublisherInfo PublisherName : BioMed Central PublisherLocation : London PublisherImprintName : BioMed Central Ira Herskowitz dies ArticleInfo ArticleID : 4766 ArticleDOI : 10.1186/gb-spotlight-20030506-01 ArticleCitationID : spotlight-20030506-01 ArticleSequenceNumber : 118 ArticleCategory : Research news ArticleFirstPage : 1 ArticleLastPage : 4 RegistrationDate : 2003–5–6 ArticleHistory : OnlineDate : 2003–5–6 ArticleCopyright : BioMed Central Ltd2003 ArticleGrants : ArticleContext : 130594411 Brendan Maher Email: [email protected] Ira Herskowitz, professor of genetics at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), died at home on April 28 of pancreatic cancer. He was 56. Remembered for clarity of mind, exceptional science, enthusiastic teaching, and a love of music, his death sent a shock throughout the yeast community this week, where Herskowitz made many great contributions and friends. "It's a great loss to us all," said Paul Nurse, Nobel Laureate and new president of The Rockefeller University. "Ira Herskowitz had a huge influence on the yeast field and on me personally." Laureate Leland Hartwell, president of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center told us in an e-mail, "I'll bet there are few scientists in genetics, molecular and cell biology who were not personally affected by him." Born in Brooklyn, NY, Herskowitz moved with his family about the country as father Irwin, a Drosophilageneticist, took various academic positions. Herskowitz received a bachelor's degree in science from the California Institute of Technology in 1967 and a PhD in microbiology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1971. After a short postdoctoral stint there, he assumed an assistant professor position at the University of Oregon. Moving in 1982 to UCSF, he immediately revamped the genetics program there, chaired the department of biochemistry and biophysics from 1990 to 1995, and co-directed the program in human genetics from 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Jasper Rine Address: Work Home Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology 400 Western Drive Division of Genet
    Curriculum Vitae Jasper Rine Address: Work Home Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology 400 Western Drive Division of Genetics Richmond, California 94801 California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences 374A Stanley Hall 510-232-4293 University of California Birth Date: October 16, 1953 Berkeley, CA 94720-3202 Tel: 510-642-7047 Fax: 510-666-2768 Higher Education Post-doctoral Fellow 1980-1982 Stanford University School of Medicine Advisor: Ronald W. Davis University of Oregon, Ph.D. 1975-1979 Molecular Genetics Advisor: Ira Herskowitz State University of New York at Albany 1971-1975 B.S. Biological Sciences, Magna Cum Laude Professional Experience Professor of Genetics Division of Genetics, Genomics and Development Department of Molecular and Cell Biology University of California, Berkeley 1990-Present Director, Human Genome Center Lawrence Berkeley Labs Berkeley, California 1991-1994 Associate Professor of Genetics Division of Genetics Department of Molecular and Cell Biology University of California, Berkeley 1989-1990 Assistant Professor of Biochemistry Department of Biochemistry University of California, Berkeley 1982-1988 Honors/Awards N.I.H. Postdoctoral Fellowship 1980-1982 The Camille and Henry Dreyfus Teacher Scholar Award 1986 Miller Research Professor, UC Berkeley 1993 Philips Distinguished Lecturer, Haverford College 1993 American Academy of Microbiology – Fellow Election 1993 Streisinger Lecturer, University of Oregon 1993 UCB Distinguished Teaching Award 1997 Richard & Rhoda Goldman Distinguished Professor of Biology
    [Show full text]
  • From Controlling Elements to Transposons: Barbara Mcclintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C
    454 Forum TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences Vol.26 No.7 July 2001 Historical Perspective From controlling elements to transposons: Barbara McClintock and the Nobel Prize Nathaniel C. Comfort Why did it take so long for Barbara correspondence. From these and other to prevent her controlling elements from McClintock (Fig. 1) to win the Nobel Prize? materials, we can reconstruct the events moving because their effects were difficult In the mid-1940s, McClintock discovered leading up to the 1983 prize*. to study when they jumped around. She genetic transposition in maize. She What today are known as transposable never had any inclination to pursue the published her results over several years elements, McClintock called ‘controlling biochemistry of transposition. and, in 1951, gave a famous presentation elements’. During the years 1945–1946, at Current understanding of how gene at the Cold Spring Harbor Symposium, the Carnegie Dept of Genetics, Cold activity is regulated, of course, springs yet it took until 1983 for her to win a Nobel Spring Harbor, McClintock discovered a from the operon, François Jacob and Prize. The delay is widely attributed to a pair of genetic loci in maize that seemed to Jacques Monod’s 1960 model of a block of combination of gender bias and gendered trigger spontaneous and reversible structural genes under the control of an science. McClintock’s results were not mutations in what had been ordinary, adjacent set of regulatory genes (Fig. 2). accepted, the story goes, because women stable alleles. In the term of the day, they Though subsequent studies revealed in science are marginalized, because the made stable alleles into ‘mutable’ ones.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Online Session Descriptions
    Thursday, April 16 2:00 pm - 6:00 pm Mammalian Trainee Symposium Session Chairs: Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, UNC Chapel Hill Linda Siracusa, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University 538A 2:00 pm No more paywalls: cost-benefit analysis across scRNA-seq platforms reveals biological insight is reproducible at low sequencing depths. Kathryn McClelland, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK/NIH) 882C 2:15 pm Control of target gene specificity in Wnt signaling by transcription factor interactions. Aravindabharathi Ramakrishnan, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2217C 2:30 pm Evolutionary genomics of centromeric satellites in House Mice (Mus). Uma Arora, The Jackson Laboratory 2:45 pm Reference quality mouse genomes reveal complete strain-specific haplotypes and novel functional loci. Mohab Helmy, EMBL-EBI 887B 3:00 pm Divergence in KRAB zinc finger proteins is associated with pluripotency spectrum in mouse embryonic stem cells. Candice Byers Jackson Laboratory 531C 3:15 pm Replicability and reproducibility of genetic analysis between different studies using identical Collaborative Cross inbred mice. UNC CHAPEL HILL 3:30 pm Proteomics reveals the role of translational regulation in ES cells. Selcan Aydin, The Jackson Laboratory for Mouse Genetics 563B 3:45 pm Super-Mendelian inheritance mediated by CRISPR–Cas9 in the female mouse germline. Hannah Grunwald, University of California San Diego 2103C 4:00 pm Gene Editing ELANE in Human Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells Reveals Variant Pathogenicity and Therapeutic Strategies for Severe Congenital Neutropenia. Shuquan Rao, Boston Childrens Hospital 4:15 pm Phase separation of YAP reorganizes genome topology for long-term YAP target gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Regions of the Electromagnetic Spectrum Do Plants Use to Drive Photosynthesis?
    Which regions of the electromagnetic spectrum do plants use to drive photosynthesis? Green Light: The Forgotten Region of the Spectrum. In the past, plant physiologists used green light as a safe light during experiments that required darkness. It was assumed that plants reflected most of the green light and that it did not induce photosynthesis. Yes, plants do reflect green light but human vision sensitivity peaks in the green region at about 560 nm, which allows us to preferentially see green. Plants do not reflect all of the green light that falls on them but they reflect enough for us to detect it. Read on to find out what the role of green light is in photosynthesis. The electromagnetic spectrum: Light Visible light ranges from low blue to far-red light and is described as the wavelengths between 380 nm and 750 nm, although this varies between individuals. The region between 400 nm and 700 nm is what plants use to drive photosynthesis and is typically referred to as Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR). There is an inverse relationship between wavelength and quantum energy, the higher the wavelength the lower quantum energy and vice versa. Plants use wavelengths outside of PAR for the phenomenon known as photomorphogenesis, which is light regulated changes in development, morphology, biochemistry and cell structure and function. The effects of different wavelengths on plant function and form are complex and are proving to be an interesting area of study for many plant scientists. The use of specific and adjustable LEDs allows us to tease apart the roles of specific areas of the spectrum in photosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
    COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME XLV---PART 1 COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME XLV MOVABLE GENETIC ELEMENTS COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY 1981 COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME XLV 1981 by The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory International Standard Book Number 0-87969-044-5 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 34-8174 Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANT1TA T1VE BIOLOGY Founded in 1933 by REGINALD G. HARRIS Director of the Biological Laboratory 1924 to 1936 Previous Symposia Volumes I (1933) Surface Phenomena XXIII (1958) Exchange of Genetic Material: Mechanism I1 (1934) Aspects of Growth and Consequences Ili (1935) Photochemical Reactions XX1V (1959) Genetics and Twentieth Century Darwinism IV (1936) Excitation Phenomena XXV (1960) Biological Clocks V (1937) Internal Secretions XXV1 (I 961) Cellular Regulatory Mechanisms VI (1938) Protein Chemistry XXVll (1962) Basic Mechanisms in Animal Virus Biology VII (1939) Biological Oxidations XXVIlI (1963) Synthesis and Structure of Macromolecules VIII (1940) Permeability and the Nature of Cell Mem- XXIX (1964) Human Genetics branes XXX (1965) Sensory Receptors 1X (1941) Genes and Chromosomes: Structure and Organi- XXXI (1966) The Genetic Code zation XXXII (1967) Antibodies X (1942) The Relation of Hormones to Development XXXIlI (1968) Replication of DNA in Microorganisms XI (1946) Heredity and Variation in Microorganisms. XXX1V (1969) The Mechanism of Protein
    [Show full text]
  • Separate Functions for Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Cryptochrome 1 During Photomorphogenesis of Arabidopsis Seedlings
    Separate functions for nuclear and cytoplasmic cryptochrome 1 during photomorphogenesis of Arabidopsis seedlings Guosheng Wu and Edgar P. Spalding† Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706 Edited by Anthony R. Cashmore, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and approved October 3, 2007 (received for review May 30, 2007) Cryptochrome blue-light receptors mediate many aspects of plant interaction with the COP1 E3 ligase, a regulator of seedling photomorphogenesis, such as suppression of hypocotyl elongation development (13, 14) that is present in the nucleus until light and promotion of cotyledon expansion and root growth. The stimulates its export to the cytoplasm (15). As a COP1 interactor, cryptochrome 1 (cry1) protein of Arabidopsis is present in the cry1 is believed to exert at least some of its effects by influencing nucleus and cytoplasm of cells, but how the functions of one pool the levels of the HY5 transcription factor, which interacts with differ from the other is not known. Nuclear localization and nuclear the promoters of some light-regulated genes (16). Comparative export signals were genetically engineered into GFP-tagged cry1 transcript-profiling studies performed on cry1 mutant and wild- molecules to manipulate cry1 subcellular localization in a cry1-null type seedlings exposed to blue light identified a large number of mutant background. The effectiveness of the engineering was genes exhibiting cry1-dependent expression at the point in time confirmed by confocal microscopy. The ability of nuclear or cyto- when cry1 begins to influence the rate of hypocotyl elongation, plasmic cry1 to rescue a variety of cry1 phenotypes was deter- which is Ϸ45 min after the onset of irradiation (17).
    [Show full text]
  • Phytochrome-Mediated Photoperception and Signal Transduction in Higher Plants
    EMBO reports Phytochrome-mediated photoperception and signal transduction in higher plants Eberhard Schäfer & Chris Bowler1,+ Universitat Freiburg, Institut fur Biologie II/Botanik, Schanzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany and 1Molecular Plant Biology Laboratory, Stazione Zoologica ‘Anton Dohrn’, Villa Comunale, I-80121 Naples, Italy Received July 1, 2002; revised September 30, 2002; accepted October 1, 2002 Light provides a major source of information from the environ- Phytochromes are typically encoded by small multigene ment during plant growth and development. Light perception families, e.g. PHYA-PHYE in Arabidopsis (Møller et al., 2002; is mediated through the action of several photoreceptors, Nagy and Schäfer, 2002; Quail, 2002a,b). Each forms a including the phytochromes. Recent results demonstrate that homodimer of ∼240 kDa and light sensitivity is conferred by the light responses involve the regulation of several thousand presence of a tetrapyrrole chromophore covalently bound to the genes. Some of the key events controlling this gene expression N-terminal half of each monomer (Montgomery and Lagarias, are the translocation of the phytochrome photoreceptors into 2002). Dimerization domains are located within the C-terminal the nucleus followed by their binding to transcription factors. half of the proteins, as are other domains involved in the activa- Coupled with these events, the degradation of positively tion of signal transduction (Quail et al., 1995; Quail, 2002a). acting intermediates appears to be an important process Each phytochrome can exist in two photointerconvertible whereby photomorphogenesis is repressed in darkness. This conformations, denoted Pr (a red light-absorbing form) and Pfr review summarizes our current knowledge of these processes. (a far red light-absorbing form) (Figure 1A).
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Highlights
    from the 2000 Annual Report HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR The research and education programs at the Laboratory continue their strong momentum. The Watson School of Biological Sciences recruited its second class of students this year, and the DNA Learning Center underwent extensive renovations that will further its educa- tional objectives. The Meetings and Courses program and Banbury Center continue to be invaluable resources for scientific information, and the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press added new projects and properties to its long list of titles. In this, the year of the Human Genome, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory was a bustling center of scientific activity. Research Cancer Malignant melanoma is an aggressive, deadly cancer that does not respond to conventional chemotherapy. Other aggressive, chemoresistant can- cers—and approximately half of all cancers—are characterized by muta- tions in the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Malignant melanomas, however, do not typically display mutations in the p53 gene. To explore alternative explanations for the origins and properties of malignant melanoma, and to identify potential targets and strategies for therapy, Scott Lowe and his colleagues have examined the status of other genes known to function downstream from p53 in a pathway leading to Scott Lowe “apoptosis” or “programmed cell death.” When intact, this pathway rids the body of abnormal, precancerous cells by triggering a cellular self-destruct mechanism. When this pathway is disrupted (by the loss of p53 function, for example), precancerous cells sur- vive and proliferate, resulting in cancer. This year, Scott and postdoctoral fellow Marisol Soengas found that malignant melanomas often lose a key trigger of programmed cell death, a protein called Apaf-1 (apop- tosis activation factor-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Photosensory Perception and Signalling in Plant Cells: New Paradigms? Peter H Quail
    180 Photosensory perception and signalling in plant cells: new paradigms? Peter H Quail Plants monitor informational light signals using three The photoreceptors sensory photoreceptor families: the phototropins, The three classes of photoreceptors perform distinctive cryptochromes and phytochromes. Recent advances photosensory and/or physiological functions in the plant suggest that the phytochromes act transcriptionally by [2,3,5]. The cryptochromes and phototropins monitor the targeting light signals directly to photoresponsive blue/ultraviolet-A (B/UV-A) region of the spectrum, promoters through binding to a transcriptional regulator. whereas the phytochromes monitor primarily the red (R) By contrast, the cryptochromes appear to act and far-red (FR) wavelengths. The cryptochromes and post-translationally, by disrupting extant proteosome- phytochromes control growth and developmental responses mediated degradation of a key transcriptional activator to variations in the wavelength, intensity and diurnal through direct binding to a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase, duration of the irradiation [2,3], whereas the phototropins thereby elevating levels of the activator and consequently function primarily in controlling directional (phototropic) of target gene expression. growth in response to directional light and/or intracellular chloroplast movement in response to light intensity [5–8]. Addresses Each of these classes consists of a small family of related Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, chromoproteins. In Arabidopsis, the most extensively Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; and USDA/ARS-Plant Gene Expression characterised plant system, there are two cryptochromes Center, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA; (cry1 and cry2) [2], two phototropins (phot1 and phot2) [9] email: [email protected] and five phytochromes (phyA–E) [10].
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY Lecture 24 - Photomorphogenesis
    Jim Bidlack - BIO 3024 PLANT PHYSIOLOGY Lecture 24 - Photomorphogenesis I. Definition and importance of photomorphogenesis A. Morphogenesis - development (origin) of form B. Photomorphogenesis - control of morphogenesis C. Examples of photomorphogenesis 1. Chlorophyll production stimulated by light 2. Leaf expansion promoted by light 3. Stem elongation inhibited by light 4. Root development promoted by light D. Pigments involved with photomorphogenesis 1. Phytochrome (red and far-red) 2. Cryptochrome (violet and blue) II. Phytochrome - "a bluish-green plant protein that, in response to variations in red light, regulates the growth of plants" A. How does it work? Pr ============> Pfr --------------> physiological response B. What does phytochrome look like? 1. Open tetrapyrrole - isomerizes when wavelength shifts C. How are physiological responses invoked? 1. Possible mechanisms: assume phytochrome is membrane bound a) Control of active transport via ATPase b) Control of membrane-bound hormones (i.e., gibberellin) c) Modulating activity of membrane-bound proteins III. Research perspective - phytochrome and calmodulin A. Calmodulin - Ca2+/calmodulin complex activates various enzymes....calmodulin role is not completely worked out. 1. Current research (Bossen, Kendrich, Kreig, Stenz, Wong, etc) a) Phytochrome changes membrane characteristics b) Causes a change in [Ca2+] c) Calmodulin gets activated and causes a physiological response IV. Application: factors affecting branching A. Genotype - breeding for more compact plants B. Growth hormones - gibberellin (internode elongation) and auxin (apical dominance) C. Temperature - higher temperature decreases branching D. Water and minerals - change leaf/stem ratio E. Clipping or grazing - stimulates branching (remove apical meristem) F. Light & plant density - more light gives more branching G. Photoperiod - longer photoperiod gives LESS branching (due to timing of light and bud dormancy).
    [Show full text]