Uniti. Loin. Rjt Fdh<Tfyfd% •Publtekfu* Lip Sutbp2itj

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uniti. Loin. Rjt Fdh<Tfyfd% •Publtekfu* Lip Sutbp2itj uniti. loin. rjt fdh<tfyfd% •publtekfu* lip SutbP2itj». From featucrja? July n, to CutfDap July 1-4. *76li . By the King, John Earl of Buckinghamshire- Henry. Arthur Eari of Powis, Comptroller of Our Household ; Charles A PROCLAMATION, Earl of Egremont, Simon Earl Harcourt, Charles Declaring His Majefifs Pleasure touching His Royal Earl Cornwallis,-Constable of Our Tower of Lon­ . Coronation, and tbe Solemnity thereof. don • Philip Earl of Hardwicke, John Earl Dela­ ware John Earl of Egmont, Wills Earl of Hililbo- GEO RG E R. rough, Percy Earl of I'homond, Treasurer of" Our Household ; .Our Right Trusty aad Well-beloved HEREAS We have resolved; by tKe Cousins and Ccunsdiors, Hugh Viscount Falmouth.* Favour and Blessing of Almighty God, Will.a n Viscount Barrington, Ciui-.icellor and Under to celebrate the Solemnity of Oar Treasurer of Our Exchequer ; John Viscount Bate­ Royal Coronation upon Tuesday the j man. John Viscount Ligonier, Master Ge::_r-il of Twenty Second Day of September next, a: Our Our Ordnance ; "Our Right Trusty and Well-beloved Palace at Westminster : And forasmuch as by antient Counsellors Philip Yorke, Esq; commonly called Customs and Usages, as also in regard of divers Te-J Lord Viscount Royston ; John Lord Berkeley ef nures of sundry Manors, Lands, and other Heredi­ Stratton, Allen- Lord Bathurst, Samuel Lord Sandys, taments, many of Our loving Subjects do claim, George Lord Anson, First Lord Commissioner of Cor and are bound to do and perform divers several Ser­ Admiralty; William Lord Mansfield, Chief Justice vices on the said Day, and at the Time of the Coro­ of Our Court of King's Bench ; George'Lord Lyt- nation, as, in Times precedent, their Ancestors, and tleton, George Lord Melcombe, Thomas Lord those from whom they claim, have done and per Grantham, William Finch, Esq; Vice Chamber'ain formed at the Coronation of Our famous Progeni­ of Our Household; George Townsliend, Esquire,. tors and Predecessors : We therefore, out of Our Henry Bilson Legge, Esquire, George Grenville, Princely Care for the Preservation of the lawful Esquire, Treasurer of Our Navy ; James Grenville, Rights and Inheritances of Our loving Subjects, Esquire, Cofferer of Our Hjausehold ; William Pitt, whom it may concern, have thought fit to give No­ Esquire, one of Our Principal Secretaries of State; Sir" tice of, and publish Our Resolutions therein'; and John Willes, Knight, Lord Chief Justice of Our Court do hereby give Notice of, and publish the same ac­ of Common Pleas; Sir John Rufhout, Baronet, Henry cordingly : And We do hereby further signify, That, Fox, Esquire, Paymaster Ge'neral of Our Forces ; by Our Commiflion under Our Great Seal of Great Sir Thomas Clarke, Knight, Master ofthe Rolls; Britain, We have appointed and authorized Our Charles Townsliend, Esquire, Our Secretary ac .most Dearly-beloved Brother and Counsellor Edward War ; Robert Nugent, Esquire, Welbore 'Ellis* Duke of York ; Our- Dearly-beloved Uncle and Esquire, and Sir Francis Dastiw'ood, Baronet, Counsellor William Duke of Cumberland; the most Treasurer of Our Chamber.; or any Five or more Reverend Father in God, Our Right Trusty and of them, to receive, hear, and determine, the Right** entirely beloved Counsellor Thomas Arch­ Petitions and Claims which sliall be to them ex­ bishop of Canterbury, Primate of all England, and hibited by any of Our loving Subjects in this Eehnis : Metropolitan ; Our Right Trusty and Well-beloved And we (hall appoint'Our said Commissioners, fer Counsellor Robert Lord Henley, Baron of Grainge, j that Purpose, to sit in the Painted Chamber of Cur Our Chancellor of Great Britain ; Our Right Trusty i Palace at Westminster, upon Tuesday the Twenty and Right Well-beloved Cousins and Counsellors John ' First Day of this Instant July, at Ten ofthe Cioclc Earl Granville. President of Our Coancil ; Richard , in the Forenoon cf ths fame Day, and, from Time Earl Temple, Keeper of Our Privy Seal ; Our Right , to Time, to adjourn, ss to them shall seem meet^ Trusty and Right entirely beloved Cousins and for the Execution of Our said Commission, which. Counsellors Wiiliam Duke of Devonshire, Lord We do thus Publish, to ;he Intent that all such Par­ Chamberlain of Oar Household ; Charles Duke of sons, whom it may any ways concern, may know Bohon. Thomas Duke of Leeds, John Duke of Bed­ when and where to give their Attendance fer the ford, John Duke of Rutland, Master dfOur Horse ; Exhibiting of their Petitions and Clains concerning Charles Duke of Queensbury, Peregrine Duke of the Services before-nientiofled to be done and per­ Ancaster, Our Great Chamberlain ; Thomas Holies formed unto Us at Our iaid Coronation : And We Duke of Newcastle, Fiist Lord Commiffioner of Our do hereby signify unto all and every Our Subjects, Treasury ; Lionel Duke of Dorset, Lord Warden whom it may concern, That Our Will and Pleasure of Our Cinque Ports; Our Right Trusty and Well- ( is, and We do hereby siricily charge pi I Person;, beloved Counsellor John Manners, Elq; commonly cf what Rank or Quality soever they be, who called Marquis of Granby, Lieutenant Gereral of either upon Our Letters to them directed, or by Rea­ Our Ordnance ; Our Right Trusty and Right Weil-' son, of their Offices or Tenures, or otherwise, are beloved Cousins and Counsellors William Earl of to do any Service at the said Day or Time of Our Talbot, Lord Steward of Our Household ; Francis Coronation, that they do duly give their Attendance Earl of Huntingdon, Groom ofthe Stole ; Basil Earl! accordingly, in all Respects furnished and appointed as to so great a Solemnity appertaineth, and answer­ of Denbigh, Daniel Earl of Winchelsea ard Not- i able to the Dignities and Places which everyone tingham, Philip Earl of Chesterfield, John Earl of of them respectively holdeth and enjoyeth j and of Sandwich, Anthony Earl osShastesbury, Robert Earl this they, or any of them, are not to fail, as they of HolHc-rnesTe, William Henry Earl of Rochford, will answer the contrary at their Perils^ unless upon George Earl'of Albemarle, William Earl .of Jersey, special Reasons by Ourself, under Our Hand, to be Frr.ncis Earl of Godolphin, George Earl of Choi- | allowed, We shall dispense with any of their Services st.ordchy, Thomas Earl of Kinnoul, Chancellor of or Attendances. Our Dutchy of Lancaster; John Earl ofHyndford, J.-.hn Earl of Lk*'c, one of Our Principal Secretaries of State ; George Dunk Earl of Halifax, Our Lieu­ Given at Our Court at St. James's, the Eight!* tenant General and General Governor of Our King­ Day of July, 1761, in the First Year of Ou* dom of Iril^nd ; James Earl of Waldegrave, Wil­ Reign, - , liam Eail of Bath, Graiu'ille Levifon Eari Gower, G 0 D Save the KING, £ Price Sixpence. J .
Recommended publications
  • THE LIFE-BOAT. the Journal of the Royal National Life-Boat Institution
    THE LIFE-BOAT. The Journal of the Royal National Life-Boat Institution. VOL. XXIV.—No. 273.] MAY, 1921. [FRIGB 64. Important Notice. Owing to the continued extraordinarily high cost of all printing, and the need for economy in view of the large capital expenditure with which the Institution is at present faced, THE LIFE-BOAT will not be published in August, and the next issue, therefore, will appear in November. This decision has been taken with less reluctance than would otherwise have been the case in view of the great amount of important and interesting matter appearing in the present issue, which is practically a double number. Annual Meeting. THE Ninety-seventh Annual General j Cameron, Commander Sir Harry Main- Meeting of THE ROYAL NATIONAL LIFE- , waring, Bt., R.N.V.R., Sir Keith Smith, BOAT INSTITUTION was held at the K.B.E., Mr. Harry Hargood, O.B.E., Central Hall, Westminster, on Thurs- Mr. H. P. Hussey, Mr. Andrew T. day, the 28th April, at 3 P.M., His Royal i Taylor, J.P., L.C.C., Mr. R. H. Gillespie, Highness the Prince of Wales, K.G., Pre- ; Mr. W. Fortescue Barratt, Hon. Secre- sident of the Institution, in the Chair. tary of the Civil Service Life-boat Fund, Among those present were:—The Con- | Mr. F. C. A. Coventry, Mr. Richard sul- General for France, the Consul- I White, Chairman of the General Steam General for Denmark the Consul-General I Navigation Company, Lieut.-Comman- for Spain, the Right Hon. the Earl der A. B. T.
    [Show full text]
  • British Reaction to the Sepoy Mutiny, 1857-1858 Approved
    BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, 1857-1858 APPROVED: Major /Professor mor Frotessar of History Dean' ot the GraduatGradua' e ScHooT* BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, 1857-185S THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Samuel Shafeeq Denton, Texas August, 1970 PREFACE English and Indian historians have devoted considerable research and analysis to the genesis of the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 but have ignored contemporary British reaction to it, a neglect which this study attempts to satisfy. After the initial, spontaneous, condemnation of Sepoy atrocities, Queen Victoria, her Parliament, and subjects took a more rational and constructive attitude toward the insurrection in India, which stemmed primarily from British interference in Indian religious and social customs, symbolized by the cartridge issue. Englishmen demanded reform, and Parliament-- at once anxious to please the electorate and to preserve the valuable colony of India--complied within a year, although the Commons defeated the first two Indian bills, because of the interposition of other foreign and domestic problems. But John Bright, Lord Edward Stanley, William Gladstone, Benjamin Disraeli, and their friends joined forces to pass the third Indian bill, which became law on August 2, 1858. For this study, the most useful primary sources are Parliamentary Debates. Journals of the House of Commons and Lords, British and Foreign State' Papers, English Historical Queen Victoria's Letters , and the Annual' Re'g'i'st'er. Of the few secondary works which focus on British reac- tion to the Sepoy Mutiny, Anthony Wood's Nineteenth Centirr/ Britain, 1815-1914 gives a good account of British politics after the Mutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish of Skipton*
    294 HISTORY OF CRAVEN. PARISH OF SKIPTON* HAVE reserved for this parish, the most interesting part of my subject, a place in Wharfdale, in order to deduce the honour and fee of Skipton from Bolton, to which it originally belonged. In the later Saxon times Bodeltone, or Botltunef (the town of the principal mansion), was the property of Earl Edwin, whose large possessions in the North were among the last estates in the kingdom which, after the Conquest, were permitted to remain in the hands of their former owners. This nobleman was son of Leofwine, and brother of Leofric, Earls of Mercia.J It is somewhat remarkable that after the forfeiture the posterity of this family, in the second generation, became possessed of these estates again by the marriage of William de Meschines with Cecilia de Romille. This will be proved by the following table:— •——————————;——————————iLeofwine Earl of Mercia§=j=......... Leofric §=Godiva Norman. Edwin, the Edwinus Comes of Ermenilda=Ricardus de Abrineis cognom. Domesday. Goz. I———— Matilda=.. —————— I Ranulph de Meschines, Earl of Chester, William de Meschines=Cecilia, daughter and heir of Robert Romille, ob. 1129. Lord of Skipton. But it was before the Domesday Survey that this nobleman had incurred the forfeiture; and his lands in Craven are accordingly surveyed under the head of TERRA REGIS. All these, consisting of LXXVII carucates, lay waste, having never recovered from the Danish ravages. Of these-— [* The parish is situated partly in the wapontake of Staincliffe and partly in Claro, and comprises the townships of Skipton, Barden, Beamsley, Bolton Abbey, Draughton, Embsay-with-Eastby, Haltoneast-with-Bolton, and Hazlewood- with-Storithes ; and contains an area of 24,7893.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley, Earls of Derby.GED
    Thomas STANLEY Eleanor NEVILLE Title: 1st Earl of Derby Died: 1504 George STANLEY Joan le STRANGE Sir Edward STANLEY of Hornby Elizabeth VAUGHAN Died: 1497 Castle dvp Title: 1st Lord Mounteagle Died: 1523 Thomas STANLEY Anne HASTINGS Mary BRANDON Thomas STANLEY Anne SPENCER Died: 1521 Title: 2nd Lord Mounteagle Died: 1560 Edward STANLEY Dorothy HOWARD Robert RATCLIFFE Margaret STANLEY Thomas SCARISBRICK Elizabeth STANLEY William STANLEY Anne LEYBOURNE John CLIFTON of Barrington Anne STANLEY Title: 3rd Earl Marr: 1530 Title: 1st Earl of Sussex Died: 1530 possibly natural daughter Title: 3rd Lord Mounteagle Court Born: 1509 Died: 1581 Died: 1572 Henry STANLEY Margaret CLIFFORD Edward SUTTON Jane STANLEY Sir Thomas STANLEY of Margaret VERNON Charles STOURTON Anne STANLEY Sir John ARUNDEL of Lanherne Edward STAFFORD Mary STANLEY Henry PARKER Elizabeth STANLEY Edward PARKER Elizabeth STANLEY Adrian SCROPE of Ursula CLIFTON Title: 4th Earl Born: 1540 Died: 1586 Warwick Title: 8th Lord Died: 1590 Title: 3rd Lord Stafford Title: Lord Morley Title: Lord Morley Died: 1585 Cockerington Born: 1531 Died: 1596 Died: 1576 Died: 1603 Died: 1577 Died: 1618 Born: Died: 1593 Died: 1623 Ferdinando STANLEY Alice SPENCER William STANLEY Elizabeth VERE John SALUSBURY of Lleweny Ursula STANLEY Sir Edward STANLEY of Tong Lucy PERCY DOROTHY ARUNDEL GERTRUDE ARUNDEL CECILY ARUNDEL Edward PARKER Elizabeth STANLEY Helen MARY BERNARD William PARKER Elizabeth TRESHAM Gervaise SCROPE Katherine HUNGERFORD Title: 5th Earl Title: 6th earl Marr: 1594 Died: 1613 Castle UID: BB002 UID: BB003 UID: LB005 Title: Lord Morley Died: 1585 PARKER Title: Lord Morley and Mounteagle Died: 1655 Died: 1594 Died: 1642 Born: 1560 Born: 1571 Died: 1623 Died: 1618 UID: GP210 Died: 1622 Sheriff of Lincs Died: 1613 Died: 1636 Order: Brigettines in Lisbon Died: 1639 Order: O.S.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis.Pdf (PDF, 297.83KB)
    Cover Illustrations by the Author after two drawings by François Boucher. i Contents Note on Dates iii. Introduction 1. Chapter I - The Coming of the Dutchman: Prior’s Diplomatic Apprenticeship 7. Chapter II - ‘Mat’s Peace’, the betrayal of the Dutch, and the French friendship 17. Chapter III - The Treaty of Commerce and the Empire of Trade 33. Chapter IV - Matt, Harry, and the Idea of a Patriot King 47. Conclusion - ‘Britannia Rules the Waves’ – A seventy-year legacy 63. Bibliography 67. ii Note on Dates: The dates used in the following are those given in the sources from which each particular reference comes, and do not make any attempt to standardize on the basis of either the Old or New System. It should also be noted that whilst Englishmen used the Old System at home, it was common (and Matthew Prior is no exception) for them to use the New System when on the Continent. iii Introduction It is often the way with historical memory that the man seen by his contemporaries as an important powerbroker is remembered by posterity as little more than a minor figure. As is the case with many men of the late-Seventeenth- and early-Eighteenth-Centuries, Matthew Prior’s (1664-1721) is hardly a household name any longer. Yet in the minds of his contemporaries and in the political life of his country even after his death his importance was, and is, very clear. Since then he has been the subject of three full-length biographies, published in 1914, 1921, and 1939, all now out of print.1 Although of low birth Prior managed to attract the attention of wealthy patrons in both literary and diplomatic circles and was, despite his humble station, blessed with an education that was to be the foundation of his later success.
    [Show full text]
  • Mundella Papers Scope
    University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: MS 6 - 9, MS 22 Title: Mundella Papers Scope: The correspondence and other papers of Anthony John Mundella, Liberal M.P. for Sheffield, including other related correspondence, 1861 to 1932. Dates: 1861-1932 (also Leader Family correspondence 1848-1890) Level: Fonds Extent: 23 boxes Name of creator: Anthony John Mundella Administrative / biographical history: The content of the papers is mainly political, and consists largely of the correspondence of Mundella, a prominent Liberal M.P. of the later 19th century who attained Cabinet rank. Also included in the collection are letters, not involving Mundella, of the family of Robert Leader, acquired by Mundella’s daughter Maria Theresa who intended to write a biography of her father, and transcriptions by Maria Theresa of correspondence between Mundella and Robert Leader, John Daniel Leader and another Sheffield Liberal M.P., Henry Joseph Wilson. The collection does not include any of the business archives of Hine and Mundella. Anthony John Mundella (1825-1897) was born in Leicester of an Italian father and an English mother. After education at a National School he entered the hosiery trade, ultimately becoming a partner in the firm of Hine and Mundella of Nottingham. He became active in the political life of Nottingham, and after giving a series of public lectures in Sheffield was invited to contest the seat in the General Election of 1868. Mundella was Liberal M.P. for Sheffield from 1868 to 1885, and for the Brightside division of the Borough from November 1885 to his death in 1897.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Appendix
    Biographical Appendix The following women are mentioned in the text and notes. Abney- Hastings, Flora. 1854–1887. Daughter of 1st Baron Donington and Edith Rawdon- Hastings, Countess of Loudon. Married Henry FitzAlan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk, 1877. Acheson, Theodosia. 1882–1977. Daughter of 4th Earl of Gosford and Louisa Montagu (daughter of 7th Duke of Manchester and Luise von Alten). Married Hon. Alexander Cadogan, son of 5th Earl of Cadogan, 1912. Her scrapbook of country house visits is in the British Library, Add. 75295. Alten, Luise von. 1832–1911. Daughter of Karl von Alten. Married William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, 1852. Secondly, married Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire, 1892. Grandmother of Alexandra, Mary, and Theodosia Acheson. Annesley, Katherine. c. 1700–1736. Daughter of 3rd Earl of Anglesey and Catherine Darnley (illegitimate daughter of James II and Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester). Married William Phipps, 1718. Apsley, Isabella. Daughter of Sir Allen Apsley. Married Sir William Wentworth in the late seventeenth century. Arbuthnot, Caroline. b. c. 1802. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. She did not marry. Arbuthnot, Marcia. 1804–1878. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. Married William Cholmondeley, 3rd Marquess of Cholmondeley, 1825. Aston, Barbara. 1744–1786. Daughter and co- heir of 5th Lord Faston of Forfar. Married Hon. Henry Clifford, son of 3rd Baron Clifford of Chudleigh, 1762. Bannister, Henrietta. d. 1796. Daughter of John Bannister. She married Rev. Hon. Brownlow North, son of 1st Earl of Guilford, 1771. Bassett, Anne. Daughter of Sir John Bassett and Honor Grenville.
    [Show full text]
  • 0681 Eblj Article 4 2005
    Henry Fox’s Drafts of Lord Hardwicke’s Speech in the Lords’ Debate on the Bill on Clandestine Marriages, 6 June 1753: A Striving for Accuracy Clyve Jones Before Hansard began publication in the early nineteenth century, the first regular and sustained reports of debates in Parliament were inaugurated in 1711 by Abel Boyer in his monthly Political State of Great Britain. In the middle of the eighteenth century the reporting of debates was forbidden by resolutions of both Houses, and such printed debates that have survived were usually written by reporters who had not heard them. Later on after 1774, when the prohibition of strangers was relaxed, there was an unprecedented printing of debates and various series of compilations were published. Before Boyer, however, the only records of debates in either the Commons or the Lords were personal ones taken by members or visitors to Parliament.1 And even after the first printing of debates by Boyer, many people, particularly those in the political elite, continued to obtain their Parliamentary information from personal accounts. These took various forms: notes taken in the Houses (sometimes written up afterwards into a more polished account, often in the form of a journal or diary, in which speeches appear to be written out in full),2 letters or parts of letters, separates (i.e., single or multiple sheets, often differing little from notes taken in the Parliament, and often concentrating on specific issues), and speeches (sometimes published, or circulated in manuscript). Often these reports consisted of lists of speakers followed by a summary of the arguments used, and occasionally they might include, in part, verbatim accounts of debates (or, at least, what look like verbatim accounts of speeches); even rarer were reports which were (or looked like) full verbatim accounts of a debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Marriage and Survival in Early Modern England
    u N oì l0 \ryOMEN, MARRIAGE AND SURVIVAL IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND THE HASTINGS, EARLS AND COUI\TESSES OF HUNTTNGDON, 1620 TO 1690 Tania Claire Jeffries Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History School of History and Politics University of Adelaide 24 June 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ul Declaration 1V Acknowledgements v List of abbreviations ... lx Chronology of events XTX Family Tree 1 Chapter 1 Introduction t9 chapter 2 The child marriage: Lucy Davies and Lord Hastings, t623-r627 57 Chapter 3 Marriage and the Impact of the Civil War, 1628-1656 ""' 98 Chapter 4 Lucy's V/idowhood and the estate, 1656-1671 142 Chapter 5 The earl's match: Elizabeth Lewys and Theophilus, ' 1672-1673 185 Chapter 6 Marriage and the sisters, 1 660- 1 68 1 Chapter 7 Maniage and revolution, 1674-1688 . 228 Epilogue Chapter 8 Conclusion 278 Bibliography 282 ERRATA should read "Malcomson" Page 104, footnote 15 "Malcolmson" read "rent roll" Page 169,line2: "rent role" should ABSTRACT a variety of national' local and In the seventeenth-century aristocratic families faced with and recovering from personal crises that threatened their survival. In dealing roles' This thesis examines the these crises, both men and women played important through their experience of role that women played in the survival of their families marriage. was the focal point of For aristocratic women in the early modern period marriage women but it their lives. Marriage was not only the only career open to aristocratic wealth, influence, was also the major way by which aristocratic families obtained name and political power, important connections and the continuation of the family not title.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canterbury Association
    The Canterbury Association (1848-1852): A Study of Its Members’ Connections By the Reverend Michael Blain Note: This is a revised edition prepared during 2019, of material included in the book published in 2000 by the archives committee of the Anglican diocese of Christchurch to mark the 150th anniversary of the Canterbury settlement. In 1850 the first Canterbury Association ships sailed into the new settlement of Lyttelton, New Zealand. From that fulcrum year I have examined the lives of the eighty-four members of the Canterbury Association. Backwards into their origins, and forwards in their subsequent careers. I looked for connections. The story of the Association’s plans and the settlement of colonial Canterbury has been told often enough. (For instance, see A History of Canterbury volume 1, pp135-233, edited James Hight and CR Straubel.) Names and titles of many of these men still feature in the Canterbury landscape as mountains, lakes, and rivers. But who were the people? What brought these eighty-four together between the initial meeting on 27 March 1848 and the close of their operations in September 1852? What were the connections between them? In November 1847 Edward Gibbon Wakefield had convinced an idealistic young Irishman John Robert Godley that in partnership they could put together the best of all emigration plans. Wakefield’s experience, and Godley’s contacts brought together an association to promote a special colony in New Zealand, an English society free of industrial slums and revolutionary spirit, an ideal English society sustained by an ideal church of England. Each member of these eighty-four members has his biographical entry.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL GALLERY FIRST WORLD WAR Name (As On
    Houses of Parliament War Memorials Royal Gallery, First World War ROYAL GALLERY FIRST WORLD WAR Also in Also in Westmins Commons Name (as on memorial) Full Name MP/Peer/Son of... Constituency/Title Birth Death Rank Regiment/Squadron/Ship Place of Death ter Hall Chamber Sources Shelley Leopold Laurence House of Lords, In Piam Memoriam, Baron Abinger Shelley Leopold Laurence Scarlett Peer 5th Baron Abinger 01/04/1872 23/05/1917 Commander Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve London, UK X MCMXIV-MCMXIX (c.1927) Humphrey James Arden 5th Battalion, London Regiment (London Rifle House of Lords, In Piam Memoriam, Adderley Humphrey James Arden Adderley Son of Peer 3rd son of 2nd Baron Norton 16/10/1882 17/06/1917 Rifleman Brigade) Lincoln, UK MCMXIV-MCMXIX (c.1927) The House of Commons Book of Bodmin 1906, St Austell 1908-1915 / Eldest Remembrance 1914-1918 (1931); Thomas Charles Reginald Thomas Charles Reginald Agar- son of Thomas Charles Agar-Robartes, 6th House of Lords, In Piam Memoriam, Agar-Robartes Robartes MP / Son of Peer Viscount Clifden 22/05/1880 30/09/1915 Captain 1st Battalion, Coldstream Guards Lapugnoy, France X X MCMXIV-MCMXIX (c.1927) Horace Michael Hynman Only son of 1st Viscount Allenby of Meggido House of Lords, In Piam Memoriam, Allenby Horace Michael Hynman Allenby Son of Peer and of Felixstowe 11/01/1898 29/07/1917 Lieutenant 'T' Battery, Royal Horse Artillery Oosthoek, Belgium MCMXIV-MCMXIX (c.1927) Aeroplane over House of Lords, In Piam Memoriam, Francis Earl Annesley Francis Annesley Peer 6th Earl Annesley 25/02/1884 05/11/1914
    [Show full text]
  • Theedinburgh Gazette. Fig Sfutft0ritg
    6431 893 TheEdinburgh Gazette. fig Sfutft0ritg. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1?, 1854. VICTORIA R. and well-beloved John, Baron Seaton, Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honourable Order of the "\TICTORIA, by the Grace of God, of the United Bath, and General in Our Army; Our right trusty V Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, and well-beloved Councillor, Edward Burtenshaw, Defender of the Faith. To Our most dearly-beloved Baron St Leonards ; Our right trusty and well- Consort, His Royal Highness Francis Albert Augus- beloved Councillor, Fitz-Roy James Henry, Baron tus Charles Emanuel, Duke of Saxony, Prince of Raglan, Knight Grand Cross of the Most Hon- Saxe-Cobourgand Gotha, Knight of OurMost Noble ourable Order of the Bath, General in Our Order of the Garter, and Field-Marshal in our Army. Army, Master-General of Our Ordnance, and ToOurright trusty and right entirely-beloved Cousin Commander of Our Forces employed on a par- and Councillor, Henry Pelham, Duke of Newcastle, ticular service; Our right trusty and well- one of Our Principal Secretaries of State; Our beloved Councillor, Sidney Herbert; Our Secre- right trusty and right entirely-beloved Cousin tary - at - War; Our trusty and well-beloved and Councillor, Arthur, Duke of Wellington, Major- James Lindsay, commonly called the Honourable General in Our Army ; Our right trusty and well- James Lindsay, Colonel in Our Army ; Our right beloved Councillor, Edward Adolphus Somerset, trusty and well-beloved Councillor, Sir James commonly called Lord Seymour ; Our right trusty Robert George Graham,
    [Show full text]