ECFR ACM List of Participants 1406
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bulgaria – the Difficult “Return to Europe”
European Democracy in Action BULGARIA – THE DIFFICULT “RETURN TO EUROPE” TAMARA BUSCHEK Against the background of the EU accession of Bulgaria on 1st January 2007 and the first Bulgarian elections for the European Parliament on 20th May 2007, Tamara Buschek takes a closer look at Bulgaria’s uneven political and economic transition – at its difficult “return to Europe”. Graduated from Graz University (Austria) in 2003 with a Masters in Law [magistra juris] after finishing her studies in European and international law. After gaining a grant from the Chamber of Commerce in 2000 to complete an internship at the Austrian Embassy in London, she carried out research for her dissertation in criminal law – “The Prevention of Sexual Child Abuse – Austria/Great Britain” - in 2001 at the London School of Economics. She studied European and administrative law in Paris from 2001 to 2002 as part of an Erasmus year. She is quadrilingual (German, Bulgarian, English and French). « BULGARIA – THE DIFFICULT RETURN TO EUROPE » MAY 2007 Table of Contents Introduction P. 1 2.3 The current governmental coalition, 2005-2007 and the P. 21 presidential election in 2006 I – Background Information P. 3 III - The first European Parliament elections, 20 May 2007 P. 25 1.1 Hopes and Fears P. 3 Conclusion P. 30 1.2 Ethnic Minorities P. 5 1.3 Economic Facts P. 7 Annex P. 32 II – Political Situation- a difficult path towards stability P. 9 Annex 1: Key facts P. 32 2.1 The transition from 1989 till 2001 P. 9 Annex 2: Economic Profile P. 33 2.1.1 The legislative elections of 1990 and the first P. -
Call from Members of the Nizami Ganjavi International Centre to the United Nations Security Council to Support the UN Secretary
Call from Members of the Nizami Ganjavi International Centre to the United Nations Security Council to Support the UN Secretary-General’s Urgent Call for an Immediate Global Ceasefire amid the COVID-19 Pandemic We are deeply alarmed that the United Nations Security Council has not been able to reach agreement on a draft resolution put before it on COVID-19. This draft resolution called for an end to hostilities worldwide so that there could be a full focus on fighting the Covid-19 pandemic. If passed it would have given powerful backing to the call made earlier by the Secretary-General. Yet, agreement could not be reached on the resolution in the Security Council because of its reference to “the urgent need to support…. all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including specialized health agencies” in the fight against the pandemic. The failure to reach agreement saddens us at this time when our world is in crisis. The Covid-19 pandemic has brought about immense human suffering and is having a devastating impact on economies and societies. It is exactly at times like this that the leadership of the Security Council is needed. It should not be silent in the face of the serious threat to global peace and security which Covid-19 represents. Global action and partnership are vital now to deal with the global pandemic and its aftermath. This is the time for the premier institution responsible for leading on global security to show strength, not weakness. We support UN Secretary-General António Guterres in his call for an immediate global ceasefire, in all corners of the world, amid the COVID-19 pandemic. -
Presidential Elections in Bulgaria of 23 and 30
March 2011 Volume 1, Issue 1 EuroMarch 2011 pean Times Volume 1, Issue th The Newsletter of Contemporary European Politics Nr.2, December 2011 Editor: José M. Magone Contents PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN BULGARIA Presidential OF 23 AND 30 0CTOBER 2011 elections in Bulgaria Presidential and Local Rossen Plevneliev was able The ruling minority in October 2011 1 Elections took place in two to prevail in the second government of party rd th General elections in rounds on 23 and 30 of round against main Citizens for the European Denmark 1 October in Bulgaria. challenger, the Socialist Development of candidate Ivailo Kalfin. Bulgaria(GERB) under The presidential elections Elections in Bulgaria Plevneviev got 52.58 prime minister Boyko were contested by 10 in October 2 percent, and Kalfin 47.42 Borissov can rely on a candidates and the local 2011(cont.) percent of the vote. president of the same elections by 85 political party. It seems that the parties. Already in the first round, presidential and local Plevneliev was able to gain Elections in Denmark In the presidential results were a confirmation 40.11 percent, while Kalfin on 16 September elections the candidate of the present government, 2011(cont.) was just a distant second supported by the in spite of the bad 3 with 28.96 percent. conservative government economic situation.(p.2). The Finnish Elections This means that until 2013, of 17 April 2011:The Strengthening of the GENERAL ELECTIONS IN DENMARK ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2011: True Finns 4 THE ELECTION OF THE FIRST DANISH FEMALE PRIME MINISTER HELLE THORNING-SCHMIDT The Legislative Elections in Poland After a decade of the vote was just 50.2 to achieve a doubling of on 9 October 2011 conservative governments , percent for a left centre their 2007 result. -
Eu-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee
EU-BULGARIA JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE 20th Meeting 28 November 2005 BRUSSELS DRAFT MINUTES 1. Adoption of the draft agenda (PE366.146/rev)............................................................ 2 . 2. Approval of the minutes of the 19th meeting of the EU-Bulgaria JPC, Sofia 24/25 January 2005 (PE 358.297)................................................................................ 2 3. Social policy and social inclusion of vulnerable groups, statement by Ms Emilia MASLAROVA, Minister of Labour and Social Policy of the Republic of Bulgaria, followed by an exchange of views.............................................. 2 4. Economic developments in Bulgaria: progress in maintaining sustainable growth and macro-economic stability, introduction by Mr Petar CHOBANOV, Executive Director, Agency for Economic Analysis and Forecasting........................................ 3 5. Progress in the adoption of legislation and its implementation, concerning justice and home affairs, introduction by Mr Margarit GANEV, Deputy Minister of Justice......... 3 6. Bulgaria’s contribution to the political and economic stability of South- East Europe and its role in furthering the European integration process in the region....................... 4 7. Exchange of views with the Commission, the Council and the Bulgarian Government on Bulgaria’s progress towards accession to the EU in the light of the Commission's 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report; the accompanying Letter of the Member of the Commission, Mr. Olli Rehn to the Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Bulgaria, Mr. Ivailo Kalfin................................. 4 Statements and briefings by: • Mr Olli REHN, Member of the European Commission • Mr Dominick CHILCOTT, UK Foreign Ministry Director of Europe, representing the Presidency-in-Office of the Council of the European Union • Ms Meglena KUNEVA, Bulgarian Minister for European Affairs 8. -
Bulgaria Urgent Interim Opinion on the Draft New
Strasbourg, 20 November 2020 CDL-PI(2020)016 Opinion No. 1002 / 2020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) BULGARIA URGENT INTERIM OPINION ON THE DRAFT NEW CONSTITUTION Issued pursuant to Article 14a of the Venice Commission’s Rules of Procedure on the basis of comments by Mr Michael FRENDO (Member, Malta) Mr James HAMILTON (Former member, Ireland) Mr Eirik HOLMØYVIK (Substitute Member, Norway) Ms Regina KIENER (Member, Switzerland) Mr Martin KUIJER, (Substitute Member, the Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-PI(2020)016 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 II. Background ................................................................................................................... 3 1. Scope of the Opinion ........................................................................................... 3 2. Amendment process ........................................................................................... 4 III. Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 6 1. Preamble and Chapters I and II (fundamental principles and human rights) ........ 6 2. Chapter III (National Assembly) ........................................................................... 9 3. Chapter VI (Judiciary) ....................................................................................... -
LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
LETTER TO G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS We write to call for urgent action to address the global education emergency triggered by Covid-19. With over 1 billion children still out of school because of the lockdown, there is now a real and present danger that the public health crisis will create a COVID generation who lose out on schooling and whose opportunities are permanently damaged. While the more fortunate have had access to alternatives, the world’s poorest children have been locked out of learning, denied internet access, and with the loss of free school meals - once a lifeline for 300 million boys and girls – hunger has grown. An immediate concern, as we bring the lockdown to an end, is the fate of an estimated 30 million children who according to UNESCO may never return to school. For these, the world’s least advantaged children, education is often the only escape from poverty - a route that is in danger of closing. Many of these children are adolescent girls for whom being in school is the best defence against forced marriage and the best hope for a life of expanded opportunity. Many more are young children who risk being forced into exploitative and dangerous labour. And because education is linked to progress in virtually every area of human development – from child survival to maternal health, gender equality, job creation and inclusive economic growth – the education emergency will undermine the prospects for achieving all our 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and potentially set back progress on gender equity by years. -
Draft Programme
Reaching the heights for the rights of the child Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the Child 2016-2021 High-Level Launching Conference Sofia, 5-6 April 2016 Draft programme Last updated 21 March 2016 2 Introduction It’s been 10 years since the Council of Europe has set up the Programme “Building a Europe for and with Children” to enhance its commitment to children and their human rights. Since 2009, this work has been guided by two consecutive Strategies on the Rights of the Child: The Stockholm Strategy (2009-2011) and the Monaco Strategy (2012-2015). A mid-term conference took stock of the latter in Dubrovnik in 2014. This conference in Sofia, entitled “Reaching the heights for the rights of the child”, launches the third Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the Child. The “Sofia Strategy”, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 March 2016, will guide the 47 member States over the next six years in addressing the following five priority objectives on the rights of the child: 1. equal opportunities for all children; 2. participation of all children; 3. a life free from violence for all children; 4. child-friendly justice for all children; 5. the rights of the child in the digital environment. The Conference is organised in the framework of the Bulgarian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe and hosted by the State Agency for Child Protection and the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of Bulgaria. It provides an opportunity for high-level representatives of member States and other international organisations to express their commitment to the Strategy and present their vision on its implementation. -
FTC London Conference 2019 Report
SEPTEMBER 9-11, 2019 CONFERENCE REPORT SPONSORED BY: IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: GLOBAL NETWORK OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV LONDON FAST-TRACK CITIES 2019 CONFERENCE REPORT Contents INTRODUCTION . 2 Conference Framework . 4 Conference Report Structure . 4 LEADERSHIP IN ACTION . 5 A Tale of Three Fast-Track Cities . 5 London . 5 Nairobi City County . 7 New York City . 9 Projecting and Monitoring 90-90-90 . 13 Modeling Impact and Effectiveness . 15 Unite as Leaders . 16 PLACING PEOPLE AT THE CENTER . 17 Addressing Stigma . 18 Promoting U=U . 18 Addressing Stigma in Key Populations . 19 Risk, Vulnerability, and Transmission . 21 Violence against Adolescent Girls and Young Women . 21 Mental Health and Substance Use . 23 Aging with HIV . 24 Migration . 25 Injection Drug Use . 25 Prioritizing Quality of Life . 26 Community-Led Responses . 28 INNOVATIONS IN HIV TESTING, ART, AND PREP . 31 Innovations in HIV Testing . 31 HIV Self-Testing . 31 HIVcheck .jp Project . 31 Click-and-Collect . 32 Provider-Initiated HIV Testing . 33 Innovations in ART and ART Delivery . 33 RAPID . 34 Crescent Care Start Initiative . 35 1917 Clinic Fast-Track . 35 Rapid Start . 36 H-Team . 37 Innovations in HIV PrEP . 38 Technology and ART . 38 ADDRESSING COMORBIDITIES . 39 Tuberculosis . 39 Viral Hepatitis . 40 Other STIs beyond HIV . 41 CONCLUSION . 42 Acknowledgements . 45 i FAST-TRACK CITIES 2019 | SEPTEMBER 9-11, 2019 | BARBICAN CENTRE, LONDON LONDON FAST-TRACK CITIES 2019 CONFERENCE REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAST-TRACK CITIES 2019 CONFERENCE REPORT WAS SPONSORED BY: INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Since the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) convened high-level stakeholders in December 2013 to plot a roadmap towards expanding access to HIV testing and treatment with the aim of blunting the course of the HIV epidemic, there has been a growing sense of commitment and optimism by governments, non-governmental organizations, funders, and community leaders that ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 may be feasible . -
Towards a Praxis-Oriented Phenomenological Methodology and Ethics of Deep Travel in Martin Heidegger’S Sojourns
Fast Capitalism ISSN 1930-014X Volume 16 • Issue 2 • 2019 doi:10.32855/fcapital.201902.013 The Solace of the Sojourn: Towards a Praxis-oriented Phenomenological Methodology and Ethics of Deep Travel in Martin Heidegger’s Sojourns Andrew Urie Introduction Martin Heidegger’s little-read travel journal, Sojourns (1962), is a literary-philosophical gem that yields surprisingly fruitful insights into our contemporary era of neoliberal globalization via its implicit exploration of the complex interconnections between travel, phenomenology, and ethics. As I demonstrate in this paper, Sojourns contains an implicit praxis-oriented phenomenological methodology and ethics of global travel that together gesture towards a coherent practice of “deep travel,” which American literature scholar Cinzia Schiavini aptly defines as “a vertical movement in a closed space which starts from the surface of the land and goes backward in time, searching for the hidden social and cultural dynamics embedded in that [given] geographical context” (94). Sociohistorical Context Originally intended as a seventieth birthday gift for Heidegger’s wife, Elfriede, Sojourns bears the following dedication: “To the mother, For her seventieth birthday, A token of Appreciation” (vi). Although penned in 1962 during Heidegger’s first journey to Greece, the text would not be published until 1989, when it was released in Germany as Aufenthalte by the venerable Frankfurt am Main publishing house Vittorrio Klostermann. It would not be available in an official English edition until 2005, -
Athens Democracy Forum 2020 “The New Abnormal: Reimagining Democracy”
Athens Democracy Forum 2020 “The New Abnormal: Reimagining Democracy” The ADF 2020 Themes Even before the current crises, democracy was taking a beating: from hijacked elections to the spread of extreme ideologies to the increasingly sophisticated tactics of strongmen. The effects have become alarmingly apparent: migration shifts, climate change, economic uncertainty and general global unrest, for a start. Since the pandemic hit and the world struggles to get out from under it, the assaults have become even more prevalent, and calls to reinvent democracy are more urgent than ever. Operating for the second year under the aegis of the Democracy and Culture Foundation, in association with The New York Times, the Athens Democracy Forum will convene leaders from government, business, civic society and the nonprofit sector to debate -- and enact -- real solutions to the world’s most pressing issues. The Foundation’s focus on impact is designed to produce the two outcomes of "better governance" and "citizen engagement." Kim Conniff Taber, Editorial Director, Athens Democracy Forum Serge Schmemann, Editorial Board Member, The New York Times and Program Director, Athens Democracy Forum Wednesday, September 30, 2020 ALL TIMES LISTED ARE ATHENS TIME (GMT +3) Hotel Grande Bretagne Studio 1:30 p.m. – 2:20 p.m. Bespoke Panel Discussion: “Business for Purpose” Roundtable Sponsored by Mishcon de Reya and National Bank of Greece What does “business for purpose” really mean? What are the different ways that businesses can acknowledge systemic problems and build toward more systemic change? This session will wrestle with these questions and more. Valerie Keller, Co-founder and CEO, Imagine (P) Alexander Rhodes, Head of Mishcon Purpose (V) Costas Michaelides, Chairman of the Board, National Bank of Greece (P) Mete Coban MBE, Founder and Chief Executive, My Life My Say (P) Moderated by Alison Smale, Journalist and former UN Undersecretary General for Global Communications, and former Executive Editor of the International Herald Tribune (P) Hotel Grande Bretagne Studio 3:00 p.m. -
Bulgaria: the Greatest Vacillations Simeon Djankov March 1, 2014 In
Bulgaria: The Greatest Vacillations Simeon Djankov March 1, 2014 In one of the most famous economics books, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Joseph Schumpeter (1942) predicted the inevitable collapse of capitalism. I grew up in the last two decades of socialism in Bulgaria and as students we were repeatedly told that socialism would prevail in the whole world, and that in Bulgaria it would soon enter its ultimate form, communism. Then everything would be free and nobody would have to work, unless they wanted to. A strange thing to tell children. Luckily, few believed. In the summer of 1989 I finished high-school and took the entrance exams in international relations at the Karl Marx Institute of Economics in Sofia. In my graduating high-school class was also the grandson of the Secretary General of the Bulgarian Communist Party Todor Zhivkov. He, too, fancied a career in diplomacy. This was a problem. There were rigid quotas for entering international studies – for fear of students taking off to the West after graduation – and in that particular year there was only one slot allotted for diplomacy. As luck had it, Zhivkov Junior failed the exams and did what most offspring of totalitarian leaders had done before – went to study in Switzerland. And I entered the Karl Marx Institute. I did not stay long at the Karl Marx Institute, and neither did its name. In December 1988 during a speech at the United Nations Council in New York, Mikhail Gorbachev had declared that the Soviet Union would no longer intervene in the international affairs of other countries from the socialist bloc. -
3Rd EU HCV Virtual Policy Summit Final Programme "Securing Wider EU Commitment to the Elimination of HCV" Wednesday, 24 March 2021 14:00 – 18:30 CET
3rd EU HCV Virtual Policy Summit Final Programme "Securing Wider EU Commitment to the elimination of HCV" Wednesday, 24 March 2021 14:00 – 18:30 CET Meeting Chairs: Prof Angelos Hatzakis, Prof George Papatheodoridis and Prof Heiner Wedemeyer Hepatitis B&C Public Policy Association Timing Programme Item Speakers 14:00 – Welcome and Introductory comments 14:25 • Welcome and scene setting Prof Heiner Wedemeyer, Co-Chair “5 years on: Revisiting the Elimination Manifesto” HepBCPPA and Hannover Medical School, Germany Prof George Papatheodoridis, Co-chair HepBCPPA and University of Athens Medical School, Greece • Introductory comments on the continued need/opportunity to eliminate HCV in Europe - European Association for the Study of the Liver Prof Maria Buti, EU Policy Councillor, EASL - ACHIEVE Coalition Mr George Kalamitsis, Co-Chair ACHIEVE Coalition and Chair, Liver Patients International - WHO Europe Dr Antons Mozalevskis, WHO Europe - European Parliament Mr Petros Kokkalis, MEP, Greece 14:25 – Keynote addresses Chair: Prof Rafael Esteban Mur 14:55 Co-Chair HepBCPPA and University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain • How the EU can help deliver on the WHO elimination goal for Mr John F Ryan, Director of Public viral Hepatitis B and C Health, Country Knowledge, Crisis Management, DG SANTE, European Commission • The elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health threat in Mr Alexis Goosdeel, Director, the EU : Keeping People Who Inject Drugs in focus European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction 14:55 – Session 1. Progress