DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidential Elections in Bulgaria of 23 and 30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidential Elections in Bulgaria of 23 and 30 March 2011 Volume 1, Issue 1 EuroMarch 2011 pean Times Volume 1, Issue th The Newsletter of Contemporary European Politics Nr.2, December 2011 Editor: José M. Magone Contents PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN BULGARIA Presidential OF 23 AND 30 0CTOBER 2011 elections in Bulgaria Presidential and Local Rossen Plevneliev was able The ruling minority in October 2011 1 Elections took place in two to prevail in the second government of party rd th General elections in rounds on 23 and 30 of round against main Citizens for the European Denmark 1 October in Bulgaria. challenger, the Socialist Development of candidate Ivailo Kalfin. Bulgaria(GERB) under The presidential elections Elections in Bulgaria Plevneviev got 52.58 prime minister Boyko were contested by 10 in October 2 percent, and Kalfin 47.42 Borissov can rely on a candidates and the local 2011(cont.) percent of the vote. president of the same elections by 85 political party. It seems that the parties. Already in the first round, presidential and local Plevneliev was able to gain Elections in Denmark In the presidential results were a confirmation 40.11 percent, while Kalfin on 16 September elections the candidate of the present government, 2011(cont.) was just a distant second supported by the in spite of the bad 3 with 28.96 percent. conservative government economic situation.(p.2). The Finnish Elections This means that until 2013, of 17 April 2011:The Strengthening of the GENERAL ELECTIONS IN DENMARK ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2011: True Finns 4 THE ELECTION OF THE FIRST DANISH FEMALE PRIME MINISTER HELLE THORNING-SCHMIDT The Legislative Elections in Poland After a decade of the vote was just 50.2 to achieve a doubling of on 9 October 2011 conservative governments , percent for a left centre their 2007 result. The socialdemocratic candidate coalition led by Thorning- social liberals got 9.5 5 Helle Thorning-Schmidt Schmidt against 49.8 percent( 2007:5.1 percent) was able to achieve a slight General Elections in percent for a right centre and the red-green coalition majority with its coalition Switzerland of 23 coalition led by increased from 2.2 to 6.7 October 2011:The partners against the Rasmussen. percent. This more than End of Growth for the Liberal candidate Løkke compensated for the loss of In terms of individual Swiss People´s Party 6 Rasmussen. In the past the socialdemocrats. A results, the social decade, the policies in the fourth important party in democrats lost 0.6 percent country have moved very the coalition is the Socialist in relation to the 2007 Pro-Russian much to the right, People´s Party(Socialistik Harmony Party general elections and particularly due to the fact Folkeparti) which had a Strongest in Latvian achieved the worst result that the Liberals were decrease of their share of General Elections on of 24.9 percent ever. While dependent on the support the vote from 13 to 9.2 17 September 2011 the social democrats of the new right anti- percent. It lost six seats and Victory for the 7 performed worse than in immigration Danish has now 16. Conservative the last elections, the Coalition in People´s Party(Dansk traditional leftwing On the right, the Liberal Portuguese General Folkeparti-DF). coalition partners, the party(Venstre) emerged as Elections on 5 June The majority of the 2011 social liberals(radikale the strongest party again leftwing coalition against venstre) and the red-green with 27.7 percent of the the rightwing coalition is Resounding Victory coalition(Enhedsliste rød- vote. It improved slightly of the People´s Party just five seats, 92 against grønne coalition) were able on its electoral result from in the General 8 87. Also the percentage of 2007(cont. p.3) Elections in Spain of 20 November 2011 European Times Page 2 1)Bulgaria’s run-off elections rd th underscore need BULGARIAN ELECTIONS ON 23 AND 30 OCTOBER 2011 for improvements in electoral process, The elections showed also local elections that were held spread across the continent. In OSCE/ODIHR some recovery of the main parallel to the presidential Bulgaria, there are 750,000 3) observers say Regierungs- posted in OSCE opposition party , the elections. In the local elections which corresponds to about 10 kandidat website Bulgarian socialists under 84 political parties took part. percent of the population. In Plevneliev Sergej Stanishev. The However, already in the first Romania, there are 1.9 Million, http://www.osc wird neuer e.org/odihr/ele result of the Socialist round the electoral results in Serbia 500,000, Hungary Präsident. ctions/84598 presidential candidate were only announced five 600,000, Slovakia 500,000, In:Spiegel accessed 4 Kalfin was certainly an days after the elections. (1) Czech Republic 275,000, November Online, improvement in Macedonia,185,000, Greece 2011 The different political parties comparison to the 14 175,000, France 300,000, 31.10.2011 alleged the ruling minority 2) Bulgarian percent of the general Germany 120,000, Spain GERB party of manipulating elections of 2009. Also in 700,000 ,Italy 130,000 and the http://www.sp Socialists results. The Bulgarian the second round, Kalfin UK 100,000. All other iegel.de/politi Demand Vote Socialists, the main opposition was quite a strong European countries have k/ausland/0,15 Recall in 5 party, asked for recounting of challenger to the smaller Roma populations 18,794908,00. Locations,. the votes in the cities of Plevneliev. below 100,000. (3) html Smolyan, Veliko Tarnovo, Posted on accessed on The Bulgarian EU Plovdiv, Sofia and the town of Membership of the EU has been website of 4 Nov. 2011 Commissioner Meglena Lom.(2) a good thing for Bulgaria, Novinite, Kunena was also a however the slow reform of the Sofia News According to final results, the presidential candidate and judiciary and other institutions big winner was the ruling Agency, 1 got 14 percent of the vote. contribute allegedly to high party GERB, because it was November Her programme was quite levels of corruption. This is the able to win 14 city councils 2011, technocratic. It may be main reason why several against 8 won by the 4) Out in the motivation enough to member-states including Streets. http://www. Bulgarian socialists. create its own centre party. France and Germany blocked Anti-Roma novinite.com/ Among the cities won by GERB the accession of Bulgaria to the rioting Elections observers from view_news.p are capital city Sofia, in which Schengen area, which allows spreads the the Organisation of EU´s hp?id=13355 before 2009, present prime Bulgarian citizens to travel and Security and Cooperation poorest minister Boyko Borisov was work in any place of the 0accessed on in Europe alerted to country. The its mayor. European Union. The main 4 Nov. 2011 several irregularities in Economist, reason is that due to the slow the voting process. In spite of this victory of 8 October reforms of Bulgaria, some 2011 moderate parties, in early According to the OSCE, criminal organisations may http://www.e October major riots and conomist.co there have been problems profit from the situation and protests took place against m/node/2153 in the procedure of gain free access to Roma and the Turkish 1502 disclosing the results in the Schengenland.(4) minority. This opportunity accessed 4 first and second round. was used by the far-right The crisis of the Greek economy Nov. 2011 Problems of tabulation and party Ataka(Attack) to has been a major factor for the vote counting were mobilise the people against difficulties of the Bulgarian presented. Moreover, Roma and the Turkish economy. Greece has been so there were allegations of minority. The difficult far one the major investors in vote buying and pressure economic situation the Balkan countries, including on voters by some parties. exarcerbates even further the Bulgaria. One third of all In total, the authorities had situation. Bulgarian banks are Greek. It to launch 106 means that there is strong investigations about these According to the Berlin dependency of the Bulgarian allegations. Institute for Population and economy on the developments Development, in 2011 it is The allegations were in Greece.(4) estimated that there are particularly related to the about 9 million in Roma Page 3 European Times THE DANISH GENERAL ELECTIONS ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2011 Nevertheless, the most coalition. The successful formation of a Europe, because the country was Sources: important partner, the new government was announced to part of the Schengen area and Helle Thorning- Conservative People´s Queen Margret on 3 October. Prime therefore had to allow the free Schmidt to be Danish Party(Konservativ Minister Thorning -Schmidt had to make movement of people from EU Prime Minister after Poll. In:BBCNews,16 Folkeparti-KF) lost concessions to the smaller government countries which signed the same September 2011, considerably and the DF partners. One of the these, is the agreement. http://www.bbc.co.u rather anti -immigration continuation of liberal economic policies k/news/world- The present government has to europe-14928312, and occasionally with similar to those of the previous Access date 4 Dec. deal with a deteriorating xenophobic and populist conservative coalition government. 2011 economic situation in Denmark. tendencies lost also slightly. New government Moreover, more investment on the The number of unemployed has Monday.In:Denmark. It meant, that Prime dk, ,8 October 2011 transition to fuel-efficient cars in order increased, so that one important Minister Lars Løkke http://www.denmar to reduce carbon dioxide became an measure achieved in November Rasmussen could not count k.dk/en/servicemen important policy area of the was to have agreement on u/News/DomesticPo on a right centre majority in liticalNews/NewGov government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eu-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee
    EU-BULGARIA JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE 20th Meeting 28 November 2005 BRUSSELS DRAFT MINUTES 1. Adoption of the draft agenda (PE366.146/rev)............................................................ 2 . 2. Approval of the minutes of the 19th meeting of the EU-Bulgaria JPC, Sofia 24/25 January 2005 (PE 358.297)................................................................................ 2 3. Social policy and social inclusion of vulnerable groups, statement by Ms Emilia MASLAROVA, Minister of Labour and Social Policy of the Republic of Bulgaria, followed by an exchange of views.............................................. 2 4. Economic developments in Bulgaria: progress in maintaining sustainable growth and macro-economic stability, introduction by Mr Petar CHOBANOV, Executive Director, Agency for Economic Analysis and Forecasting........................................ 3 5. Progress in the adoption of legislation and its implementation, concerning justice and home affairs, introduction by Mr Margarit GANEV, Deputy Minister of Justice......... 3 6. Bulgaria’s contribution to the political and economic stability of South- East Europe and its role in furthering the European integration process in the region....................... 4 7. Exchange of views with the Commission, the Council and the Bulgarian Government on Bulgaria’s progress towards accession to the EU in the light of the Commission's 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report; the accompanying Letter of the Member of the Commission, Mr. Olli Rehn to the Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Bulgaria, Mr. Ivailo Kalfin................................. 4 Statements and briefings by: • Mr Olli REHN, Member of the European Commission • Mr Dominick CHILCOTT, UK Foreign Ministry Director of Europe, representing the Presidency-in-Office of the Council of the European Union • Ms Meglena KUNEVA, Bulgarian Minister for European Affairs 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Market Consequences of Job Security and Labor Laws in the Era of Flexicurity: Implications for Turkey
    Labor Market Consequences of Job Security and Labor Laws Issue 1, in the Era of Flexicurity: Implications for Turkey February, 2013 Labor Market Consequences of Job Security and Labor Laws in the Era of Flexicurity: Implications for Turkey Author: Meltem Ince Yenılmez, Department of Economics, Yasar University, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey, [email protected] ‘Never was labour more central to the process of value-making. But never were the workers… more vulnerable to the organisation, since they had become lean individuals, farmed out in a flexible network whose whereabouts were unknown to the organisation itself.’ Manuel Castells (1996) 1 To balance flexibility and security, Denmark provides a very good combination in labor market by both high labor market activities and social protection which is called flexicurity. The major aim of the system is to protect employees and employers with strict job protection and employment insurance. Therefore, to reach the targets introduced to the market, EU countries aimed to decrease unemployment rates by creating more suitable jobs for people were handled with great attention. Of course, regulations on laws, active labor market policies and social security system. In this paper, it is tried to point out the characteristics of Danish flexicurity ad the model used to solve the unemployment problems that are followed by EU countries. But can Danish case of flexicurity be successful in Turkey? Which laws have changed and policies have been made up to now in order to restructure the labor market in Turkey? What kind of regulations were enforced by Act 4857 to reduce the unemployment and the new policies to be followed? All of those questions were examined to discover whether Danish flexicurity can be used in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland | Freedom House Page 1 of 13
    Finland | Freedom House Page 1 of 13 FinlandFREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2020 100 FREE /100 Political Rights 40 Civil Liberties 60 100 Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. TOP Overview https://freedomhouse.org/country/finland/freedom-world/2020 7/24/2020 Finland | Freedom House Page 2 of 13 Finland’s parliamentary system features free and fair elections and robust multiparty competition. Corruption is not a significant problem, and freedoms of speech, religion, and association are respected. The judiciary is independent under the constitution and in practice. Women and ethnic minority groups enjoy equal rights, though harassment and hate speech aimed at minority groups does occur. Key Developments in 2019 • In March, the right-leaning coalition government, headed by Juha Sipilä of the Center Party, resigned after failing to push through a reform of the health care system. • A general election was held in April, with the Social Democratic Party receiving the largest share of the vote. A new left-leaning coalition government was formed in June, comprising the Social Democratic Party, Center party, Green League, Left Alliance, and Swedish People’s Party of Finland. • Following criticism within the coalition about Prime Minister Antti Rinne’s handing of a strike by postal workers in November, he resigned in December. The Social Democratic Party chose Sanna Marin to replace him. • The parliament in March completed passage of a package of bills that empowered the intelligence service and defense forces to conduct communications surveillance on national security matters. Political Rights A. Electoral Process TOP A1 0-4 pts Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 https://freedomhouse.org/country/finland/freedom-world/2020 7/24/2020 Finland | Freedom House Page 3 of 13 The president, whose role is mainly ceremonial, is directly elected for up to two six-year terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland' Political Structure NCEE
    2020-21 Legislative International Education Study Group OVERVIEW OF FINLAND’S POLITICAL STRUCTURE Political Structure:1,2 • Finland is a parliamentary representative republic with both a popularly elected president, whose role is mostly ceremonial, and a parliament with a cabinet and a prime minister. • Finland has a 200-member unicameral parliament (Eduskunta). Almost all members are directly elected in single- and multi-seat constituencies by proportional representation vote to four-year terms. The most recent parliamentary elections were held in April 2019 (see below). They will be held again in April 2023.3 • Finland’s president is directly elected by absolute majority popular vote for a six- year term and is eligible to serve a second term. The current president, Sauli Niinisto, was elected in 2012 and reelected in 2018. The next presidential election will be held in 2024.4 • Finland’s prime minister is appointed by the Eduskunta.5 The current prime minister, Sanna Marin, was appointed in December 2019 (see below).6 Political Context: Finland has a strong history of multi-party politics, with no one party having majority control for long. In 2015, the Center Party won the majority of parliamentary seats and formed a coalition with the National Coalition Party and the relatively new Finns Party. The Finns Party was formed in 1995 and is a nationalist, Euro-sceptic and anti-establishment party. The 2015 coalition was the first time the Finns Party had participated in government. However, in March 2019, just a month before parliamentary elections in April, the coalition government fell apart. The April 2019 national election was the first in Finland’s history in which no party came away with more than 20 percent of the vote.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Programme
    Reaching the heights for the rights of the child Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the Child 2016-2021 High-Level Launching Conference Sofia, 5-6 April 2016 Draft programme Last updated 21 March 2016 2 Introduction It’s been 10 years since the Council of Europe has set up the Programme “Building a Europe for and with Children” to enhance its commitment to children and their human rights. Since 2009, this work has been guided by two consecutive Strategies on the Rights of the Child: The Stockholm Strategy (2009-2011) and the Monaco Strategy (2012-2015). A mid-term conference took stock of the latter in Dubrovnik in 2014. This conference in Sofia, entitled “Reaching the heights for the rights of the child”, launches the third Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the Child. The “Sofia Strategy”, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 March 2016, will guide the 47 member States over the next six years in addressing the following five priority objectives on the rights of the child: 1. equal opportunities for all children; 2. participation of all children; 3. a life free from violence for all children; 4. child-friendly justice for all children; 5. the rights of the child in the digital environment. The Conference is organised in the framework of the Bulgarian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe and hosted by the State Agency for Child Protection and the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of Bulgaria. It provides an opportunity for high-level representatives of member States and other international organisations to express their commitment to the Strategy and present their vision on its implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants Liste Des Participants
    LIST OF PARTICIPANTS LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS 142nd IPU Assembly and Related Meetings (virtual) 24 to 27 May 2021 - 2 - Mr./M. Duarte Pacheco President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union Président de l'Union interparlementaire Mr./M. Martin Chungong Secretary General of the Inter-Parliamentary Union Secrétaire général de l'Union interparlementaire - 3 - I. MEMBERS - MEMBRES AFGHANISTAN RAHMANI, Mir Rahman (Mr.) Speaker of the House of the People Leader of the delegation EZEDYAR, Mohammad Alam (Mr.) Deputy Speaker of the House of Elders KAROKHAIL, Shinkai (Ms.) Member of the House of the People ATTIQ, Ramin (Mr.) Member of the House of the People REZAIE, Shahgul (Ms.) Member of the House of the People ISHCHY, Baktash (Mr.) Member of the House of the People BALOOCH, Mohammad Nadir (Mr.) Member of the House of Elders HASHIMI, S. Safiullah (Mr.) Member of the House of Elders ARYUBI, Abdul Qader (Mr.) Secretary General, House of the People Member of the ASGP NASARY, Abdul Muqtader (Mr.) Secretary General, House of Elders Member of the ASGP HASSAS, Pamir (Mr.) Acting Director of Relations to IPU Secretary to the delegation ALGERIA - ALGERIE GOUDJIL, Salah (M.) Président du Conseil de la Nation Président du Groupe, Chef de la délégation BOUZEKRI, Hamid (M.) Vice-Président du Conseil de la Nation (RND) BENBADIS, Fawzia (Mme) Membre du Conseil de la Nation Comité sur les questions relatives au Moyen-Orient KHARCHI, Ahmed (M.) Membre du Conseil de la Nation (FLN) DADA, Mohamed Drissi (M.) Secrétaire Général, Conseil de la Nation Secrétaire général
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Recreational Fishery on the Formal Danish Economy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Roth, Eva; Jensen, Susanne Working Paper Impact of Recreational Fishery on the Formal Danish Economy IME Working Paper, No. 48 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Environmental and Business Economics (IME), University of Southern Denmark Suggested Citation: Roth, Eva; Jensen, Susanne (2003) : Impact of Recreational Fishery on the Formal Danish Economy, IME Working Paper, No. 48, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Environmental and Business Economics (IME), Esbjerg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/83058 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Impact of recreational fishery on the formal Danish economy Eva Roth Susanne Jensen October 2003 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation OECD Reviews of Regional Central and Southern Denmark
    OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation Regional of Reviews OECD Central and Southern Denmark Contents OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation Assessment and recommendations Introduction Central Chapter 1. Innovation and the economies of Central and Southern Denmark Chapter 2. Danish governance and policy context for regional strategies and Southern Denmark I Chapter 3. Regional strategies for innovation-driven growth nnovation C e nt r al an al d So uth er n D n Please cite this publication as: e OECD (2012), OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation: Central and Southern Denmark 2012, nma OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264178748-en r k This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases. Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org, and do not hesitate to contact us for more information. isbn 978-92-64-17873-1 04 2012 09 1 P -:HSTCQE=V\]\XV: 042012091.indd 1 08-Aug-2012 2:19:29 PM OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation: Central and Southern Denmark 2012 This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2012), OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation: Central and Southern Denmark 2012, OECD Publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing EU-Russia Relations
    “We are living through a global counter-revolution. The institutions and values of liberal internationalism are being eroded beneath our feet and societies are becoming increasingly polarised. The consensus for EU action is increasingly difficult to forge, but there is a way forward. In this new world, on our tenth anniversary, the European Council on Foreign Relations will take a bottom-up approach to building grassroots consensus for greater cooperation on European foreign and security policy. Our vision is to demonstrate that engaging in common European action remains the most effective way of protecting European citizens. But we will reach out beyond those already converted to our message, framing our ideas and calls for action in a way that resonates with key decision- makers and the wider public across Europe’s capitals.” Mark Leonard, Director “ We believe a common foreign policy will allow individual countries to increase their global influence. A strong European voice in favour of human rights, democracy and international law will not just benefit Europeans; it will be good for the world.” Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer, Mark Leonard and Mabel van Oranje writing in the Financial Times, 1 October 2007 ecfr.eu Our leadership The European Council on Foreign Relations We provide a safe meeting space for decision- (ECFR) is an award-winning international makers and influencers to share ideas for think-tank that aims to conduct cutting-edge common action; we promote informed debate independent research in pursuit of a on Europe’s role in the world; and we build coherent, effective and values-based pan-European coalitions for policy change.
    [Show full text]