Deciphering a Duality: Understanding Conflicting Standards in Sex & Violence Censorship in U.S. Obscenity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deciphering a Duality: Understanding Conflicting Standards in Sex & Violence Censorship in U.S. Obscenity Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Political Science Honors Projects Political Science Department Spring 5-1-2012 Deciphering a Duality: Understanding Conflicting Standards in Sex & Violence Censorship in U.S. Obscenity Law Rushabh P. Bhakta Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors Part of the American Politics Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, and the Sociology of Culture Commons Recommended Citation Bhakta, Rushabh P., "Deciphering a Duality: Understanding Conflicting Standards in Sex & Violence Censorship in U.S. Obscenity Law" (2012). Political Science Honors Projects. Paper 36. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors/36 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deciphering a Duality: Understanding Conflicting Standards in Sex & Violence Censorship in U.S. Obscenity Law Submitted May 1, 2012 Rushabh Prakash Bhakta Advised by Professor Patrick Schmidt Department of Political Science Macalester College '12 1 Deciphering a Duality: Understanding Conflicting Standards in Sex & Violence Censorship in U.S. Obscenity Law Honors Colloquium 2011-2012 Abstract This research examines the division in US obscenity law that enables strict sex censorship while overlooking violence. By investigating the social and legal development of obscenity in US culture, I argue that the contemporary duality in obscenity censorship standards arose from a family of forces consisting of faith, economy, and identity in early American history. While sexuality ingrained itself in American culture as a commodity in need of regulation, violence was decentralized from the state and proliferated. This phenomenon led to a prioritization of suppressing sexual speech over violent speech. This paper traces the emergence this duality and its source. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Introduction – A Liberty Divided 4 Chapter 1 – The Origins of America’s Obsession with Regulating Sex 6 A. Introduction- The Paradigm for Sex as Obscenity 6 B. Transforming Religiosity and Shaping American Christianity 6 C. Race, Gender, and Sexuality – How Concepts of Citizenship Shaped Sex Suppression 12 D. The Comstock Era – The Rise of Victorian Values and the Social Purity Movement 15 E. Conclusion – An Emerging Ethical Identity 20 Chapter 2 – The Development of Sex Censorship 21 A. Introduction- Proliferation and Liberalization 21 B. Charity & Education - The Institutionalization of Protestant Moral Unity 21 C. Immigration and Citizenship’s Evolution – How Sex Became Integral to Identity 26 D. Free Speech in the Face of Temperance – The Failure of Social Purity 32 E. Hicklin to Roth – Establishing and Adapting Sex as Obscenity 38 F. Conclusion – Retaining Tradition, Acknowledging Progress 41 Chapter 3 – Sexual Obscenity and the Contemporary Era 42 A. Introduction – Revolution and Reaction 42 B. Entering the Modern Debate – Sexual Proliferation and the Reactionary Response 42 C. Jacobellis to Miller – Developing Modern Obscenity 46 D. Conclusion – The Right to Censor 50 Chapter 4 – The Origins of America’s Relationship with Violence 51 A. Introduction - The Paradigm for Violence as Obscenity 51 B. The Role of Violence in America’s Ethical Origins 51 C. A Mission of Morality – Curbing Criminality and Mischief 55 D. Conclusion – Deconstructing “Legitimacy” in Violence 60 Chapter 5 – The Development of Violence in American Culture 61 A. Introduction - New Media and the Divergence of Violence from Obscenity 61 B. The “Convergence” of Media – The Sidelining and Emergence of Violence Obscenity 61 C. Hicklin to Reno – Violence as Indecency 67 D. Conclusion – Obscenity in the 20th Century 70 Chapter 6 – The Contemporary Debate on Violence Obscenity 71 A. Introduction – Ancient Standards, Modern Society 71 B. Stevens & Brown - Confronting Over a Hundred Years of Precedent 71 C. Reconciling the Roles of Violence and Sexuality 75 D. Conclusion – Censorship and the Ideological Preservation of America Itself 79 Conclusion – Deciphering a Duality 80 3 Acknowledgments I would first like to express my deep gratitude to Professor Patrick Schmidt, my honors advisor. He provided vital insight and direction which guided my research in substantive ways. Without the long hours he spent editing and analyzing my work, I would not have been able to succeed in finishing my project. Furthermore, I would like to thank both Professors Terry Boychuk and Zornitsa Keremidchieva for introducing me to many of the authors and theories I studied in preparation for my thesis. Another invaluable source of expertise and constructive critique was my Honors Colloquium which consisted of Professor Julie Dolan and my honors peers Matthew Mullarky, Jisoo Hong, and Kaitlin Roh. Finally, I’d also like to thank my close friends Kyle Serafin, Logan Sand, Nicholas Pernsteiner, Mason Wells, Robert Strickling, and Jackson Robbins for all of their emotional and moral support throughout the year. The efforts of all of these individuals were paramount to the completion of my research. 4 Introduction – A Liberty Divided In his wake there exists only chaos, violent carnage so visceral and palpable that it blurs the ever thinning line between entertainment and war. Whether it is explicit torture or gratuitously stylized executions, his craftsmanship in cruelty is only limited by the imagination and audacity of the individual willingly commanding his every exploit. “He” is James Earl Cash, the fictional protagonist of the controversial 2003 video game entitled Manhunt, and the “individual” is any man, woman, or child in the US with access to interactive new media. However, such seemingly uninhibited proliferation of violent speech is not a global phenomenon. Just across the pond and north of America’s borders, this title is either highly restricted and regulated or banned all together due to its legally obscene content.1 Conversely, these other regions enjoy day/nighttime television programming like Skins, a serial drama with frequent and graphic depictions of teen sex and nudity marketed to youth demographics. Skins garnered critical acclaim and commercial success in Britain, but, when a heavily edited adaption of the show arrived in the US, it met immediate resistance and a hasty demise. Though the remake was censored specifically for sex, nudity, adolescent promiscuity and sexual language, it was regarded by many as morally repugnant and accused of portraying child pornography and legal obscenity. Due to the rapid loss of commercial sponsors and impending legal challenges, the show was quickly cancelled and taken off the air.2 Neither of these events represents an isolated event or solitary example of inverse obscenity interpretation, rather they are merely small pieces of a much greater pattern spanning centuries of culture and law. The pattern of obscenity censorship in the US is uniquely different from all other western nation states, particularly Canada, New Zealand, Australia and most of 1 Smith, Tony. "Australia bans Manhunt." Register. 30 Sep 2004: n. page. 2 Szalai, Georg. "PTC Calls MTV's 'Skins' the 'Most Dangerous Show for Teens'." Hollywood Reporter. 12 Jan 2011: n. page. 5 Europe. While these other states interpret obscenity law to enable censorship of violent speech quite severely, they often provide much more freedom to sexual speech than the US does. Furthermore, the US fails to acknowledge violent speech as categorically susceptible to obscenity law. This often overlooked predicament came to national attention recently with the case of Brown v. EMA (2011) where the question of violence as legal obscenity was assessed with regard to violence in video games. The Supreme Court found that violent video games represented legitimate speech protected by the First Amendment and not vulnerable to suppression or strict regulation by the government as obscenity. This controversial ruling reignited the legal, political and public debate regarding the discrepancy between sexuality and violence censorship standards and prompted my research question: Why does U.S. obscenity law focus on censoring sexual speech while virtually ignoring violent speech? In my paper, I argue that a family of forces consisting of faith, economy, and identity, created during early American history and integrated throughout it, has solidified sexual speech as a threat to society while enabling violent speech to exist. Furthermore, a decentralization of violence as a cultural commodity simultaneously helped institute violent speech as a form of expression that represented no threat to the public welfare. I argue the validity of these assertions by first analyzing sexual speech by dividing it into three sections of its development in the US: origins, development, and contemporary. I then compare this analysis to violent speech’s parallel development with the same sections. Throughout these six chapters I will employ the use of historical, socio-cultural, political, and judicial evidence in tandem in order to articulate the
Recommended publications
  • The First Amendment, the Public-Private Distinction, and Nongovernmental Suppression of Wartime Political Debate Gregory P
    Working Paper Series Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Year 2004 The First Amendment, The Public-Private Distinction, and Nongovernmental Suppression of Wartime Political Debate Gregory P. Magarian Villanova University School of Law, [email protected] This paper is posted at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/wps/art6 THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE PUBLIC -PRIVA TE DISTINCTION, AND NONGOVERNMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF WARTIME POLITICAL DEBATE 1 BY GREGORY P. MAGARIAN DRAFT 5-12-04 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 I. CONFRONTING NONGOVERNMENTAL CENSORSHIP OF POLITICAL DEBATE IN WARTIME .................. 5 A. The Value and Vulnerability of Wartime Political Debate ........................................................................... 5 1. The Historical Vulnerability of Wartime Political Debate to Nongovernmental Suppression ....................................................................... 5 2. The Public Rights Theory of Expressive Freedom and the Necessity of Robust Political Debate for Democratic Self -Government........................ 11 B. Nongovernmental Censorship of Political Speech During the “War on Terrorism” ............................................... 18 1. Misinformation and Suppression of Information by News Media ............................................ 19 2. Exclusions of Political Speakers from Privately Owned Public Spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early History of the Anti-Contraceptive Laws in Massachusetts and Connecticut Author(S): Carol Flora Brooks Source: American Quarterly, Vol
    The Early History of the Anti-Contraceptive Laws in Massachusetts and Connecticut Author(s): Carol Flora Brooks Source: American Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Spring, 1966), pp. 3-23 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2711107 Accessed: 04-10-2016 15:00 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Quarterly This content downloaded from 137.140.166.174 on Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:00:43 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms CAROL FLORA BROOKS Dundas, Ont., Canada The Early History of the Anti-Contraceptive Laws in Massachusetts and Connecticut THE DEBATE WHICH SPORADICALLY ERUPTS IN THE COURTS AND PRESS OF Massachusetts over its law against the dissemination of contraceptive information and in Connecticut over its law against the use of contra- ceptives has concerned primarily the anti-contraceptive doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church.' The religious snarls in this controversy have nearly obliterated any memory of the widespread popular and legal sup- pression of discussion about contraception which prevailed in the United States prior to the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolling & the First Amendment
    TROLLING & THE FIRST AMENDMENT: PROTECTING INTERNET SPEECH IN THE ERA OF CYBERBULLIES & INTERNET DEFAMATION Fernando L. Diaz TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 136 II. Background ......................................................................................... 139 A. Levels of Scrutiny as Applied to Different Types of Speech ...... 139 B. The Supreme Court’s Protection of Anonymous Speech in Traditional Forums ...................................................................... 140 III. Analysis ............................................................................................... 143 A. Using Elonis v. United States as a Case Study in Consideration of the Incompatibility of Traditional First Amendment Jurisprudence with Internet Speech. ...................... 143 B. Court Decisions Regarding Anonymous Speech on the Internet ................................................................................... 147 C. Legislative Overreach .................................................................. 154 IV. Recommendation ................................................................................ 156 V. Conclusion .......................................................................................... 158 “Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our liberty depends upon the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech the First Amendment protects.”1 - Judge Dalzell Fernando L. Diaz has a B.A.,
    [Show full text]
  • Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma Robert Corn-Revere
    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 45 Article 4 Number 2 Winter 2018 1-1-2018 Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma Robert Corn-Revere Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert Corn-Revere, Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma, 45 Hastings Const. L.Q. 301 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol45/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Certainty and the Censor's Dilemma by ROBERT CORN-REVERE* Pity the plight of poor Anthony Comstock. The man H. L. Mencken described as "the Copernicus of a quite new art and science," who literally invented the profession of antiobscenity crusader in the waning days of the nineteenth century, ultimately got, as legendary comic Rodney Dangerfield would say, "no respect, no respect at all." As head of the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, and special agent for the U.S. Post Office under a law that popularly bore his name, Comstock was, in Mencken's words, the one "who first capitalized moral endeavor like baseball or the soap business, and made himself the first of its kept professors."' For more than four decades, Comstock terrorized writers, publishers, and artists-driving some to suicide-yet he also was the butt of public ridicule.
    [Show full text]
  • Bessie L. Moses 1893-1965, BALTIMORE CITY
    Bessie L. Moses 1893-1965, BALTIMORE CITY ... We resent, as physicians, any limitation on the part of the government to our right to ... any medical articles, books or instruments ... ntil 1936, American women had little access to birth control. The rigid Comstock Laws, proposed by antivice reformer, Anthony Comstock, Uand passed by Congress in 1873, tightened the existing law against obscenity and specified that birth-control information and items could not be mailed or imported. Although this censorship prevented couples from limiting family size and posed sometimes life-threatening health problems for all women, the poor were most vulnerable. Limited incomes and large families sig- nificantly reduced standards of living and quality of life. Untold numbers of women, particularly poor women, attempted to terminate unwanted pregnan- cies through illegal or self-inflicted abortions. They paid heavy tolls in morbid- ity and mortality. In 1916, Margaret Sanger opened America's first birth-control clinic in Brooklyn, New York.9 A decade later, a group of liberal leaders determined to save women's lives opened a similar clinic in Baltimore and chose Dr. Bessie Moses as its first medical director. Bessie Moses was born in Baltimore during the waning days of horsecars and kerosene street lamps. After attending public schools, she graduated in 1915 from Goucher College and then studied biology at Johns Hopkins COURTES* ()F THE PLANNED PARENTHOOD liMXLATION OF MARYLAND, INC. HEALTH AND SCIENCE 209 University. Moses wanted to study medicine, but discouraged by her family, she spent the next two years teaching biology and zoology at Tulane University and Wellesley College.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 20 3 V2.Indd
    Newsletter of The Independent Institute Volume 20, Number 3 Fall 2010 Can We Finally Give Free Markets a Chance? by Mary L. G. Theroux* theory of “market failure” worse schools with fewer graduates, at a massively is widely touted as the higher cost. The Department of Defense’s failure cause of our current econom- to provide for the common defense resulted only in ic woes, despite the theory’s the addition of more bureaucracy in the form of the own failure and the inherent Department of Homeland shortcomings of its various in- Security. And, most recently, carnations, as revealed in the we have the inept response Independent Institute’s book, Market Failure or of the Environmental Pro- Success. Rather, systemic government tection Agency—tasked by failure is the far more consistent expla- law since 1994 to plan for nation for disasters such as the 2008 and be first responder to oil fi nancial crash, as detailed spills—and other federal in “Anatomy of a Train agencies to the BP blowout. Wreck: Causes of the Mort- And the list goes on. gage Meltdown”—a chap- Such continued acceptance of govern- ter in our recent book, ment failure must result from a false Housing America—which assumption that since government pro- shows the role of govern- vides a service now, government must be ment failure in creating the necessary for that service’s provision—i.e., these are fi nancial bubble that misdi- “public goods” that a market would not provide— rected resources into inher- or at least, not sufficiently—if government did not ently unsustainable activities.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Reproductive Justice?
    o o o o o .
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Emma Goldman: a Curriculum for Middle and High School Students
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 356 998 SO 023 057 AUTHOR Falk, Candace; And Others TITLE The Life and Times of Emma Goldman: A Curriculum for Middle and High School Students. Primary Historical Documents on: Immigration, Freedom of Expression, Women's Rights, Anti-Militarism, Art and Literature of Social Change. INSTITUTION California Univ., Berkeley. Emma Goldman Papers Project.; Los Angeles Educational Partnership, CA.; New Directions Curriculum Developers, Berkeley, CA. REPORT NO ISBN-0-9635443-0-6 PUB DATE 92 NOTE 139p.; Materials reproduced from other sources will not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROMEmma Goldman Papers Project, University of California, 2372 Ellsworth Street, Berkeley, CA 94720 ($13, plus $3 shipping). PCB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Females; Feminism; Freedom of Speech; Higher Education; High Schools; Hig ,School Students; *Humanities Instruction; Intermediate Grades; Junior High Schools; Labor; Middle Schools; Primary Sources; *Social Studies; *United States History; Units of Study IDENTIFIERS *Goldman (Emma); Middle School Students ABSTRACT The documents in this curriculum unit are drawn from the massive archive collected by the Emma Goldman Papers Project at the University of California (Berkeley). They are linked to the standard social studies and humanities curriculum themes of art and literature, First Amendment rights, labor, progressive politics, and Red Scare, the rise of industrialization, immigration, women's rights, World War I, and
    [Show full text]
  • Online Hate and Harmful Content
    Online Hate and Harmful Content In times of ever-increasing changes in technology and online socio-cultural trends, there is a constant and pressing need for updated knowledge. This book provides the most up-to-date study of online hate speech and harms associated with the Internet. By presenting ground-breaking comparative research and intro- ducing new concepts such as Identity Bubble Reinforcement, it breaks new ground both empirically and theoretically. Sveinung Sandberg, Professor, University of Oslo Over the past few decades, various types of hate material have caused increasing concern. Today, the scope of hate is wider than ever, as easy and often-anonymous access to an enormous amount of online content has opened the Internet up to both use and abuse. By providing possibilities for inexpensive and instantaneous access without ties to geographic location or a user identification system, the Internet has permitted hate groups and individuals espousing hate to transmit their ideas to a worldwide audience. Online Hate and Harmful Content focuses on the role of potentially harmful online content, particularly among young people. This focus is explored through two approaches: first, the commonality of online hate through cross-national survey statistics. This includes a discussion of the various implications of online hate for young people in terms of, for example, subjective wellbeing, trust, self- image and social relationships. Second, the book examines theoretical frame- works from the fields of sociology, social psychology and criminology that are useful for understanding online behaviour and online victimisation. Limitations of past theory are assessed and complemented with a novel theoretical model linking past work to the online environment as it exists today.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion, Privacy, and Values in Conflict
    Chapter 20: Abortion, Privacy, and Values in Conflict annenbergclassroom.org/resource/the-pursuit-of-justice/pursuit-justice-chapter-20-abortion-privacy-values- conflict May 4, 2017 Roe v. Wade (1973) Abortion has roiled the waters of modern American life as few other issues have. Beneath this debate are simmering differences over basic values: the rights of the unborn and the related matter of when life begins, the rights of women to control their reproductive functions and preserve their health, the expectation that women’s most important role is to bear children, and the role of the state in selecting among these values. The resulting conflicts have haunted American history, and today they are an exceptionally tense social and political issue. In colonial times and in the nation’s early years, abortion was unregulated, in large measure because giving birth was at least as, if not more, dangerous than having an abortion. Under such circumstances state lawmakers concluded that it made little sense to declare abortion a crime. That position was reinforced by the English common law, which allowed abortions until the point of “quickening,” the first time a pregnant woman felt the movement of an unborn fetus, usually in the fourth or fifth month of a pregnancy. By 1860 this lack of attention began to change, and lawmakers in twenty of the thirty-three states in the Union had criminalized abortion. These new laws, collectively known as the Comstock laws, and named after Anthony Comstock, a politician and postal inspector, did not punish women seeking abortions, but instead levied fines and jail terms against doctors and others who performed the procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Contemporary Popular Music
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 11 Issue 2 Issue 2 - Winter 2009 Article 2 2009 The "Spiritual Temperature" of Contemporary Popular Music Tracy Reilly Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Tracy Reilly, The "Spiritual Temperature" of Contemporary Popular Music, 11 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 335 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol11/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The "Spiritual Temperature" of Contemporary Popular Music: An Alternative to the Legal Regulation of Death-Metal and Gangsta-Rap Lyrics Tracy Reilly* ABSTRACT The purpose of this Article is to contribute to the volume of legal scholarship that focuses on popular music lyrics and their effects on children. This interdisciplinary cross-section of law and culture has been analyzed by legal scholars, philosophers, and psychologists throughout history. This Article specifically focuses on the recent public uproar over the increasingly violent and lewd content of death- metal and gangsta-rap music and its alleged negative influence on children. Many legal scholars have written about how legal and political efforts throughout history to regulate contemporary genres of popular music in the name of the protection of children's morals and well-being have ultimately been foiled by the proper judicial application of solid First Amendment free-speech principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Your Own Rogues Trading Cards! (PDF)
    b a b a b a b a b a sssssssssss sssssssssss sssssssssss sssssssssss sssssssssss sssssssssss Abner B. Newcomb Ann Trow Lohman Anthony Comstock Peter Ellis aka Banjo Bill Gurney aka “Big detective sssssssssssabortionist postalsssssssssss inspector, moral crusader Pete aka Luther aka Big Bill” the Queersman aka asssssssssss b Pete aka Peter Emerson 1833-unknown. The son of suc- a b a b Big Bill the Koniacker 1812-78. Emigrated to New York 1844-1915. Founded the N.Y. So- thief counterfeit, thief, cracksman cessful parents, was writing for in her teens, married Charles Lo- ciety for the Suppression of Vice sssssssssss sssssssssss Boston newspapers by age 17, a b a b hman, freethinker and friend of and lobbied Congress to pass the Ca. 1845-unknown. Minstrel- was made editor of the Rockland Comstock Law prohibiting dis- Life dates unknown. Ran a large Chief of Police George Matsell. gang member, helped rob over Republican, and then wrote for With her husband and brother, semination of obscene material and organized gang of counter- $2.7 million from the Manhat- the New York World. In 1861 was developed a line of birth control and information on birth control. feiters who flooded the entire made secretary for the U.S. Mar- products and abortifacients, and Sworn enemy of Madame Rest- tan Institute for Savings in 1878, country with millions of dollars shall and then Detective. After the performed abortions. Committed ell, Victoria Woodhull, Tennessee a heist funded in part by Marm in fake bills in the late 1860s and War, appointed Operative in the suicide soon after being arrested Claflin, Margaret Sanger, Emma Mandelbaum the fence.
    [Show full text]