DOCSLIB.ORG

PROVISIONAL PEER-REVIEWED TOXICITY VALUES for N-HEPTANE (CASRN 142-82-5)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States EPA/690/R-16/003F Environmental Protection Final Agency 9-08-2016 Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for n-Heptane (CASRN 142-82-5) Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS CHEMICAL MANAGER Lucina E. Lizarraga, PhD National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH CONTRIBUTORS Q. Jay Zhao, MPH, PhD, DABT National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH Scott C. Wesselkamper, PhD National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH DRAFT DOCUMENT PREPARED BY SRC, Inc. 7502 Round Pond Road North Syracuse, NY 13212 PRIMARY INTERNAL REVIEWERS J. Phillip Kaiser, PhD, DABT National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH Ghazi Dannan, PhD National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC This document was externally peer reviewed under contract to: Eastern Research Group, Inc. 110 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3136 Questions regarding the contents of this PPRTV assessment should be directed to the EPA Office of Research and Development’s National Center for Environmental Assessment, Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center (513-569-7300). ii n-Heptane TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................. iv BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................1 DISCLAIMERS ...............................................................................................................................1 QUESTIONS REGARDING PPRTVs ............................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................2 REVIEW OF POTENTIALLY RELEVANT DATA (NONCANCER AND CANCER) ..............4 HUMAN STUDIES .................................................................................................................... 9 Oral Exposures ........................................................................................................................ 9 Inhalation Exposures ............................................................................................................... 9 ANIMAL STUDIES ................................................................................................................. 10 Oral Exposures ...................................................................................................................... 10 Inhalation Exposures ............................................................................................................. 12 OTHER DATA (SHORT-TERM TESTS, OTHER EXAMINATIONS) ................................ 15 Genotoxicity .......................................................................................................................... 15 Supporting Human Toxicity Studies ..................................................................................... 16 Supporting Neurotoxicity Studies in Animals ...................................................................... 16 Acute Systemic Toxicity in Animals .................................................................................... 16 Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Elimination (ADME) Studies .......................... 17 Mode-of-Action/Mechanistic Studies ................................................................................... 19 DERIVATION OF PROVISIONAL VALUES ............................................................................20 DERIVATION OF ORAL REFERENCE DOSES .................................................................. 20 DERIVATION OF INHALATION REFERENCE CONCENTRATIONS ............................. 21 Derivation of a Subchronic Provisional Reference Concentration (p-RfC) ......................... 23 Derivation of a Chronic Provisional Reference Concentration (p-RfC) ............................... 25 CANCER WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE DESCRIPTOR ............................................................ 27 DERIVATION OF PROVISIONAL CANCER POTENCY VALUES ................................... 28 APPENDIX A. SCREENING PROVISIONAL VALUES ...........................................................29 APPENDIX B. DATA TABLES ...................................................................................................42 APPENDIX C. BENCHMARK DOSE MODELING RESULTS ................................................48 APPENDIX D. REFERENCES .....................................................................................................56 iii n-Heptane COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS α2u-g alpha 2u-globulin MN micronuclei ACGIH American Conference of Governmental MNPCE micronucleated polychromatic Industrial Hygienists erythrocyte AIC Akaike’s information criterion MOA mode of action ALD approximate lethal dosage MTD maximum tolerated dose ALT alanine aminotransferase NAG N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase AST aspartate aminotransferase NCEA National Center for Environmental atm atmosphere Assessment ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and NCI National Cancer Institute Disease Registry NOAEL no-observed-adverse-effect level BMD benchmark dose NTP National Toxicology Program BMDL benchmark dose lower confidence limit NZW New Zealand White (rabbit breed) BMDS Benchmark Dose Software OCT ornithine carbamoyl transferase BMR benchmark response ORD Office of Research and Development BUN blood urea nitrogen PBPK physiologically based pharmacokinetic BW body weight PCNA proliferating cell nuclear antigen CA chromosomal aberration PND postnatal day CAS Chemical Abstracts Service POD point of departure CASRN Chemical Abstracts Service Registry PODADJ duration-adjusted POD Number QSAR quantitative structure-activity CBI covalent binding index relationship CHO Chinese hamster ovary (cell line cells) RBC red blood cell CL confidence limit RDS replicative DNA synthesis CNS central nervous system RfC inhalation reference concentration CPN chronic progressive nephropathy RfD oral reference dose CYP450 cytochrome P450 RGDR regional gas dose ratio DAF dosimetric adjustment factor RNA ribonucleic acid DEN diethylnitrosamine SAR structure activity relationship DMSO dimethylsulfoxide SCE sister chromatid exchange DNA deoxyribonucleic acid SD standard deviation EPA Environmental Protection Agency SDH sorbitol dehydrogenase FDA Food and Drug Administration SE standard error FEV1 forced expiratory volume of 1 second SGOT glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, also GD gestation day known as AST GDH glutamate dehydrogenase SGPT glutamic pyruvic transaminase, also GGT γ-glutamyl transferase known as ALT GSH glutathione SSD systemic scleroderma GST glutathione-S-transferase TCA trichloroacetic acid Hb/g-A animal blood-gas partition coefficient TCE trichloroethylene Hb/g-H human blood-gas partition coefficient TWA time-weighted average HEC human equivalent concentration UF uncertainty factor HED human equivalent dose UFA interspecies uncertainty factor i.p. intraperitoneal UFH intraspecies uncertainty factor IRIS Integrated Risk Information System UFS subchronic-to-chronic uncertainty factor IVF in vitro fertilization UFD database uncertainty factor LC50 median lethal concentration U.S. United States of America LD50 median lethal dose WBC white blood cell LOAEL lowest-observed-adverse-effect level iv n-Heptane FINAL 09-08-2016 PROVISIONAL PEER-REVIEWED TOXICITY VALUES FOR n-HEPTANE (CASRN 142-82-5) BACKGROUND A Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Value (PPRTV) is defined as a toxicity value derived for use in the Superfund Program. PPRTVs are derived after a review of the relevant scientific literature using established Agency guidance on human health toxicity value derivations. All PPRTV assessments receive internal review by a standing panel of National Center for Environment Assessment (NCEA) scientists and an independent external peer review by three scientific experts. The purpose of this document is to provide support for the hazard and dose-response assessment pertaining to chronic and subchronic exposures to substances of concern, to present the major conclusions reached in the hazard identification and derivation of the PPRTVs, and to characterize the overall confidence in these conclusions and toxicity values. It is not intended to be a comprehensive treatise on the chemical or toxicological nature of this substance. The PPRTV review process provides needed toxicity values in a quick turnaround timeframe while maintaining scientific quality. PPRTV assessments are updated approximately on a 5-year cycle for new data or methodologies that might impact the toxicity values or characterization of potential for adverse human health effects and are revised as appropriate. It is important to utilize the PPRTV database (http://hhpprtv.ornl.gov) to obtain the current information available. When a final Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment is made publicly available on the Internet (http://www.epa.gov/iris), the respective PPRTVs are removed from the database. DISCLAIMERS The PPRTV document provides toxicity values and information about the adverse effects of the chemical and the evidence on which the value is based, including the strengths and limitations of the data. All users are advised to review the information provided in this document to ensure
Recommended publications
  • Ignition Characteristics of Heptane-Hydrogen and Heptane

    Ignition Characteristics of Heptane-Hydrogen and Heptane

    international journal of hydrogen energy 36 (2011) 15392e15402 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/he Ignition characteristics of heptaneehydrogen and heptaneemethane fuel blends at elevated pressures S.K. Aggarwal*, O. Awomolo, K. Akber Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W, Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60607, USA article info abstract Article history: There is significant interest in using hydrogen and natural gas for enhancing the perfor- Received 20 May 2011 mance of diesel engines. We report herein a numerical investigation on the ignition of Received in revised form n-C7H16/H2 and n-C7H16/CH4 fuel blends. The CHEMKIN 4.1 software is used to model 17 August 2011 ignition in a closed homogenous reactor under conditions relevant to diesel/HCCI engines. Accepted 19 August 2011 Three reaction mechanisms used are (i) NIST mechanism involving 203 species and 1463 Available online 14 September 2011 reactions, (ii) Dryer mechanism with 116 species and 754 reactions, and (iii) a reduced mechanism (Chalmers) with 42 species and 168 reactions. The parameters include pres- Keywords: sures of 30 atm and 55 atm, equivalence ratios of ɸ ¼ 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0, temperature range of e Hydrogeneheptane blends 800 1400 K, and mole fractions of H2 or CH4 in the blend between 0 and 100%. For Methaneeheptane blends n-C7H16/air mixtures, the Chalmers mechanism not only provides closer agreement with Ignition measurements compared to the other two mechanisms, but also reproduces the negative Engine conditions temperature coefficient regime. Consequently, this mechanism is used to characterize the effects of H2 or CH4 on the ignition of n-C7H16.
  • Organic Chemistry Name Formula Isomers Methane CH 1 Ethane C H

    Organic Chemistry Name Formula Isomers Methane CH 1 Ethane C H

    Organic Chemistry Organic chemistry is the chemistry of carbon. The simplest carbon molecules are compounds of just carbon and hydrogen, hydrocarbons. We name the compounds based on the length of the longest carbon chain. We then add prefixes and suffixes to describe the types of bonds and any add-ons the molecule has. When the molecule has just single bonds we use the -ane suffix. Name Formula Isomers Methane CH4 1 Ethane C2H6 1 Propane C3H8 1 Butane C4H10 2 Pentane C5H12 3 Hexane C6H14 5 Heptane C7H16 9 Octane C8H18 18 Nonane C9H20 35 Decane C10H22 75 Isomers are compounds that have the same formula but different bonding. isobutane n-butane 1 Naming Alkanes Hydrocarbons are always named based on the longest carbon chain. When an alkane is a substituent group they are named using the -yl ending instead of the -ane ending. So, -CH3 would be a methyl group. The substituent groups are named by numbering the carbons on the longest chain so that the first branching gets the lowest number possible. The substituents are listed alphabetically with out regard to the number prefixes that might be used. 3-methylhexane 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 Alkenes and Alkynes When a hydrocarbon has a double bond we replace the -ane ending with -ene. When the hydrocarbon has more than three carbon the position of the double bond must be specified with a number. 1-butene 2-butene Hydrocarbons with triple bonds are named basically the same, we replace the -ane ending with -yne.
  • N-Heptane (Pure Grade) Version 1.9 Revision Date 2020-05-20

    N-Heptane (Pure Grade) Version 1.9 Revision Date 2020-05-20

    SAFETY DATA SHEET n-Heptane (Pure Grade) Version 1.9 Revision Date 2020-05-20 SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking Product information Product Name : n-Heptane (Pure Grade) Material : 1119723, 1099971, 1016082, 1099970, 1084145, 1061726, 1021845, 1028621, 1021842, 1021844, 1028384, 1028355, 1021843, 10455211 Company : Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP Specialty Chemicals 10001 Six Pines Drive The Woodlands, TX 77380 Local : See Company Address Emergency telephone: Health: 866.442.9628 (North America) 1.832.813.4984 (International) Transport: CHEMTREC 800.424.9300 or 703.527.3887(int'l) Asia: CHEMWATCH (+612 9186 1132) China: 0532 8388 9090 EUROPE: BIG +32.14.584545 (phone) or +32.14583516 (telefax) Mexico CHEMTREC 01-800-681-9531 (24 hours) South America SOS-Cotec Inside Brazil: 0800.111.767 Outside Brazil: +55.19.3467.1600 Argentina: +(54)-1159839431 Responsible Department : Product Safety and Toxicology Group E-mail address : [email protected] Website : www.CPChem.com SECTION 2: Hazards identification Classification of the substance or mixture GHS Classification and labelling according to JIS Z 7252-2019 and JIS Z 7253-2019 (GHS 2015) Classification : Flammable liquids, Category 2 Skin corrosion/irritation, Category 2 Serious eye damage/eye irritation, Category 2 Specific target organ toxicity - single exposure, Category 3, SDS Number:100000067062 1/14 SAFETY DATA SHEET n-Heptane (Pure Grade) Version 1.9 Revision Date 2020-05-20 Respiratory tract irritation, Narcotic effects Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure, Category 1, Nervous system Aspiration hazard, Category 1 Short-term (acute) aquatic hazard, Category 1 Long-term (chronic) aquatic hazard, Category 1 Labeling Symbol(s) : Signal Word : Danger Hazard Statements : H225: Highly flammable liquid and vapor.
  • United States Patent [191 [11] Patent Number: 4,639,533 Finnan [45] Date of Patent: Jan

    United States Patent [191 [11] Patent Number: 4,639,533 Finnan [45] Date of Patent: Jan

    United States Patent [191 [11] Patent Number: 4,639,533 Finnan [45] Date of Patent: Jan. 27, 1987 [54] ALPHA TOCOPHEROL PROCESS [56] References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS [75] Inventon Jeffrey L- Finn?n, Southgate, Mich- 4,191,692 3/1980 Grafen et a1. ..................... .. 549/411 4,208,334 6/1980 Fitton et a1. 549/411 [73] Assignee: BASF Corporation, Wyandotte, 4,217,2 8 5 8 / 1980 Y 05 h’mo et a 1. ................... .. 549 / 411 Mich. Primary Examiner-Nicky Chan Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Rupert B. Hurley, Jr.; Joseph [21] Appl. No.: 403,085 D. Michaels [57] ABSTRACT . _ D,1-a1pha-toc0phero1 can be prepared by reacting [22] Flled' Jul’ 29’ 1982 trimethylhydroquinone and a phytyl derivative such as phytol or isophytol in the presence of a Lewis acid, a [51] Int. Cl.4 .......................................... .. C07D 311/72 strong acid and an amine. [52] US. Cl. ............................. .. [58] Field of Search .............................. .. 549/411, 410 19 Claims, No Drawings 4,639,533 1 2 halogen-leaving groups are preferably chlorine and ALPHA TOCOPHEROL PROCESS bromine. The preferred lower alkylsulfonyloxy leaving group is mesyloxy. The preferred arylsulfonyloxy leav BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION ing group is tosyloxy. The preferred lower alkanoyloxy 1. Field of the Invention group is acetoxy. The preferred lower alkoxy leaving This invention relates to an improved process for groups are n-butoxy, methoxy, isobutoxy, and ethoxy. manufacturing d,l-alpha-tocopherol. As used throughout the speci?cation, the term “halo 2. Description of the Prior Art gen” includes all four halogens such as bromine, chlo The preparation of d,l-alpha-tocopherol by the con rine, ?uorine and iodine.
  • Organic Nomenclature: Naming Organic Molecules

    Organic Nomenclature: Naming Organic Molecules

    Organic Nomenclature: Naming Organic Molecules Mild Vegetable Alkali Aerated Alkali What’s in a name? Tartarin Glauber's Alkahest Alkahest of Van Helmot Fixed Vegetable Alkali Russian Pot Ash Cendres Gravellees Alkali Mild Vegetable Oil of Tartar Pearl Ash Tartar Alkahest of Reapour K2CO3 Alkali of Reguline Caustic Sal Juniperi Potassium Carbonate Ash ood Alkali of Wine Lees Salt of Tachenius W Fixed Sal Tartari Sal Gentianae Alkali Salt German Ash Salt of Wormwood Cineres Clavellati Sal Guaiaci exSal Ligno Alkanus Vegetablis IUPAC Rules for naming organic molecules International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists 3 Name Molecular Prefix Formula Methane CH4 Meth Ethane C2H6 Eth Alkanes Propane C3H8 Prop Butane C4H10 But CnH2n+2 Pentane C5H12 Pent Hexane C6H14 Hex Heptane C7H16 Hept Octane C8H18 Oct Nonane C9H20 Non Decane C10H22 Dec 4 Structure of linear alkanes propane butane pentane hexane heptane octane nonane decane 5 Constitutional Isomers: molecules with same molecular formula but differ in the way in which the atoms are connected to each other 6 Physical properties of constiutional isomers 7 Isomers n # of isomers 1 1 2 1 The more carbons in a 3 1 molecule, the more 4 2 possible ways to put 5 3 them together. 6 5 7 9 8 18 9 35 10 75 15 4,347 25 36,797,588 8 Naming more complex molecules hexane C6H14 9 Naming more complex molecules Step 1: identify the longest continuous linear chain: this will be the root name: this is the root name 2 4 6 longest chain = 6 (hexane) 1 3 5 2 4 3 4 3 2 2 1 5 4 1 3 5 correct 1 incorrect longest chain = 5 (pentane) longest chain = 5 (pentane) 1 3 1 2 2 3 4 4 longest chain = 4 (butane) longest chain = 4 (butane) 10 Naming more complex molecules Step 2: identify all functional group (the groups not part of the “main chain”) CH3 2 4 4 3 2 1 5 1 3 5 CH3 main chain: pentane main chain: pentane CH3 1 3 1 2 2 3 4 4 CH3 CH3 CH3 main chain: butane main chain: butane 11 Alkyl groups: fragments of alkanes H H empty space (point where it H C H H C attaches to something else) H H methane methyl CH4 CH3 12 More generally..
  • KALIAPPAN Bachelor of Engin

    KALIAPPAN Bachelor of Engin

    PREDICTION OF PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE PHASE ENVELOPES OF MULTICOMPONENT HYDROCARBON SYSTEMS By C .. S._ KALIAPPAN I/ Bachelor of Engineering University of Madras Madras, India 1961 Master of Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India 1963 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1971 OKl.AHONll\ STATE Ut·.;!VERSITY LIBRARY APR 3 1975 PREDICTION OF PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE PHASE ENVELOPES OF MULTICOMPONENT HYDROCARBON SYSTEMS Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis adviser, Dr. A. M. Rowe, Jr., for his encouragement and guidance throughout this study. He has been extremely helpful in solving various problems which arose during the course of this work. I am deeply indebted to my advisory committee members, Drs. J. A. Wiebelt, R. J. Schoppel, and R. L. Robinson, Jr., for their exceptional guidance and constructive suggestions. I am grateful to the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering for the financial support during my attendance at Oklahoma State University. I offer my thanks to Margaret Estes for the typing of this manuscript. I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation to Watumull Foundation, Hawaii, for their financial aid to prepare this thesise Finally, I sincerely thank my wife, Padmavathi, and daughter, Sivakami, and my parents whose understanding, encouragement, and sacrifice were invaluable in the preparation of this dissertation. TABI.E OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION • 1 II. PHASE DIAGRAMS 6 2.1 Phase Diagrams • • • • • 6 2.2 One Component Systems • • • • 6 2.3 Two Component Systems 7 2.4: Systems Containing Three or More Components 10 III.
  • Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: a Review

    Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: a Review

    Catalysts 2015, 5, 145-269; doi:10.3390/catal5010145 OPEN ACCESS catalysts ISSN 2073-4344 www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts Review Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: A Review Morris D. Argyle and Calvin H. Bartholomew * Chemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1-801-422-4162, Fax: +1-801-422-0151. Academic Editor: Keith Hohn Received: 30 December 2013 / Accepted: 12 September 2014 / Published: 26 February 2015 Abstract: Deactivation of heterogeneous catalysts is a ubiquitous problem that causes loss of catalytic rate with time. This review on deactivation and regeneration of heterogeneous catalysts classifies deactivation by type (chemical, thermal, and mechanical) and by mechanism (poisoning, fouling, thermal degradation, vapor formation, vapor-solid and solid-solid reactions, and attrition/crushing). The key features and considerations for each of these deactivation types is reviewed in detail with reference to the latest literature reports in these areas. Two case studies on the deactivation mechanisms of catalysts used for cobalt Fischer-Tropsch and selective catalytic reduction are considered to provide additional depth in the topics of sintering, coking, poisoning, and fouling. Regeneration considerations and options are also briefly discussed for each deactivation mechanism. Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis; deactivation; regeneration 1. Introduction Catalyst deactivation, the loss over time of catalytic activity and/or selectivity, is a problem of great and continuing concern in the practice of industrial catalytic processes. Costs to industry for catalyst replacement and process shutdown total billions of dollars per year. Time scales for catalyst deactivation vary considerably; for example, in the case of cracking catalysts, catalyst mortality may be on the order of seconds, while in ammonia synthesis the iron catalyst may last for 5–10 years.
  • Chemical Compatibility Chart

    Chemical Compatibility Chart

    Chemical Compatibility Chart 1 Inorganic Acids 1 2 Organic acids X 2 3 Caustics X X 3 4 Amines & Alkanolamines X X 4 5 Halogenated Compounds X X X 5 6 Alcohols, Glycols & Glycol Ethers X 6 7 Aldehydes X X X X X 7 8 Ketone X X X X 8 9 Saturated Hydrocarbons 9 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons X 10 11 Olefins X X 11 12 Petrolum Oils 12 13 Esters X X X 13 14 Monomers & Polymerizable Esters X X X X X X 14 15 Phenols X X X X 15 16 Alkylene Oxides X X X X X X X X 16 17 Cyanohydrins X X X X X X X 17 18 Nitriles X X X X X 18 19 Ammonia X X X X X X X X X 19 20 Halogens X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 21 Ethers X X X 21 22 Phosphorus, Elemental X X X X 22 23 Sulfur, Molten X X X X X X 23 24 Acid Anhydrides X X X X X X X X X X 24 X Represents Unsafe Combinations Represents Safe Combinations Group 1: Inorganic Acids Dichloropropane Chlorosulfonic acid Dichloropropene Hydrochloric acid (aqueous) Ethyl chloride Hydrofluoric acid (aqueous) Ethylene dibromide Hydrogen chloride (anhydrous) Ethylene dichloride Hydrogen fluoride (anhydrous) Methyl bromide Nitric acid Methyl chloride Oleum Methylene chloride Phosphoric acid Monochlorodifluoromethane Sulfuric acid Perchloroethylene Propylene dichloride Group 2: Organic Acids 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Acetic acid 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Butyric acid (n-) Trichloroethylene Formic acid Trichlorofluoromethane Propionic acid Rosin Oil Group 6: Alcohols, Glycols and Glycol Ethers Tall oil Allyl alcohol Amyl alcohol Group 3: Caustics 1,4-Butanediol Caustic potash solution Butyl alcohol (iso, n, sec, tert) Caustic soda solution Butylene
  • MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Diisobutylaluminium Hydride, 1.0M Solution in Heptane

    MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Diisobutylaluminium Hydride, 1.0M Solution in Heptane

    MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Diisobutylaluminium hydride, 1.0M solution in heptane Section 1 ­ Chemical Product and Company Identification MSDS Name: Diisobutylaluminium hydride, 1.0M solution in heptane Catalog Numbers: 20105­0000, 20105­1000, 20105­8000 Synonyms: DIBAL­H, 1.0M solution in heptane Company Identification: Acros Organics BVBA Janssen Pharmaceuticalaan 3a 2440 Geel, Belgium Company Identification: (USA) Acros Organics One Reagent Lane Fair Lawn, NJ 07410 For information in the US, call: 800­ACROS­01 For information in Europe, call: +32 14 57 52 11 Emergency Number, Europe: +32 14 57 52 99 Emergency Number US: 201­796­7100 CHEMTREC Phone Number, US: 800­424­9300 CHEMTREC Phone Number, Europe: 703­527­3887 Section 2 ­ Composition, Information on Ingredients CAS# Chemical Name: % EINECS# Hazard Symbols: Risk Phrases: 142­82­5 Heptane (n­) 80 205­563­8 F N XN 11 38 50/53 65 67 1191­15­7 Diisobutylaluminum hydride 20 214­729­9 F C 14/15 17 35 Text for R­phrases: see Section 16 Hazard Symbols: F C N Risk Phrases: 11 14/15 35 50/53 65 67 Section 3 ­ Hazards Identification EMERGENCY OVERVIEW Highly flammable. Reacts violently with water liberating extremely flammable gases. Causes severe burns. Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long­term adverse effects in the aquatic environment. Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed. Vapours may cause drowsiness and dizziness. Potential Health Effects Eye: Causes eye burns. Skin: Causes skin burns. Ingestion: Causes gastrointestinal tract burns. May cause lung damage. Inhalation: Causes chemical burns to the respiratory tract. Chronic: Section 4 ­ First Aid Measures Eyes: Immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes, occasionally lifting the upper and lower eyelids.
  • Ch 11 Solutions/Solubility/Colligative Practice

    Ch 11 Solutions/Solubility/Colligative Practice

    1 General Chemistry II Jasperse Solutions and Solubility. Extra Practice Problems Viscosity, Surface Tension, Boiling Point…. 1. Viscosity is a measure of a substance’s __________ a. ability to resist changes in its surface area b. compressibility c. surface tension d. color e. resistance to flow. 2. The resistance of a liquid to an increase in its surface area is __________ a. surface tension b. a meniscus c. viscosity d. impossible e. capillary action 3. Rank the viscosity (1 being highest), if all are at the same 50ºC temperature. CH3CH2OCH3 CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH3 4. Rank the surface tension (1 being highest), if all are at the same 50ºC temperature. CH3CH2OCH3 CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH3 5. Rank the vapor pressure (1 being highest), if all are at the same 50ºC temperature. CH3CH2OCH3 CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH3 6. Rank the evaporation rate (1 being highest), if all are at the same 50ºC temperature. CH3CH2OCH3 CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH3 7. Rank the volatility (1 being highest), if all are at the same 50ºC temperature. CH3CH2OCH3 CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH3 8. Rank the boiling points(1 being highest) of the following. CH3CH2OCH3 CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH3 Note: The same concept applies to a bunch of different phenomena, and to a bunch of different terms. The above batch of mostly redundant problems are just a reminder of how you need to be familiar with the different terms (volatility, vapor pressure, viscosity, surface tension, etc.) 2 9. Rank the surface tension, 1 being highest: CH3CH2CH2NH2 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2NH2 N(CH3)3 CH3CH2CH2CH3 10. Rank the viscosity (1 being highest), if all are at the same 50ºC temperature.
  • Ignition Studies of N-Heptane/Iso-Octane/Toluene Blends

    Ignition Studies of N-Heptane/Iso-Octane/Toluene Blends

    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Ignition studies of n-heptane/iso-octane/toluene blends Javed, Tamour; Lee, Changyoul; AlAbbad, Mohammed; Author(s) Djebbi, Khalil; Beshir, Mohamed; Badra, Jihad; Curran, Henry J.; Farooq, Aamir Publication Date 2016-07-09 Javed, Tamour, Lee, Changyoul, AlAbbad, Mohammed, Publication Djebbi, Khalil, Beshir, Mohamed, Badra, Jihad, Curran, Henry Information J., Farooq, Aamir. (2016). Ignition studies of n-heptane/iso- octane/toluene blends. Combustion and Flame, 171, 223-233. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.06.008 Publisher Elsevier ScienceDirect Link to publisher's http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.06.008 version Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6096 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.06.008 Downloaded 2021-09-29T19:21:36Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. Ignition studies of n-heptane/iso-octane/toluene blends Tamour Javed1, Changyoul Lee2, Mohammed AlAbbad1, Khalil Djebbi1, Mohamed Beshir1, Jihad Badra3, Henry Curran2, Aamir Farooq1* 1 Clean Combustion Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2 Combustion Chemistry Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland 3 Fuel Technology Division, R&DC, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract Ignition delay times of four ternary blends of n-heptane/iso-octane/toluene, referred to as Toluene Primary Reference Fuels (TPRFs), have been measured in a high-pressure shock tube and in a rapid compression machine.
  • Influence of Combustion Characteristics and Fuel

    Influence of Combustion Characteristics and Fuel

    energies Article Influence of Combustion Characteristics and Fuel Composition on Exhaust PAHs in a Compression Ignition Engine Hamisu Adamu Dandajeh 1,2,*, Midhat Talibi 2, Nicos Ladommatos 2 and Paul Hellier 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria PMB 1045, Nigeria 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 29 May 2019; Accepted: 23 June 2019; Published: 4 July 2019 Abstract: This paper reports an experimental investigation into the effects of fuel composition on the exhaust emission of toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from a diesel engine, operated at both constant fuel injection and constant fuel ignition modes. The paper quantifies the US EPA (United State Environmental Protection Agency) 16 priority PAHs produced from combustion of fossil diesel fuel and several model fuel blends of n-heptane, toluene and methyl decanoate in a single-cylinder diesel research engine based on a commercial light duty automotive engine. It was found that the level of total PAHs emitted by the various fuel blends decreased with increasing fuel ignition delay and premixed burn fraction, however, where the ignition delay of a fuel blend was decreased with use of an ignition improving additive the level of particulate phase PAH also decreased. Increasing the level of toluene present in the fuel blends decreased levels of low toxicity of two to four ring PAH, while displacing n-heptane with methyl decanoate increased particulate phase adsorbed PAH. Overall, the composition of the fuels investigated was found to have more influence on the concentration of exhaust PAHs formed than that of combustion characteristics, including ignition delay, peak heat release rate and the extent of the premixed burn fractions.