DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Description Document Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Description Document Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards PROJECT DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT CLIMATE, COMMUNITY & BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS The Nature Conservancy of Canada DARKWOODS FOREST CARBON PROJECT v. 1.6 Darkwoods Forest Carbon Project July 11, 2013 Version 1.6 3GreenTree Ecosystem Services Ltd. For The Nature Conservancy of Canada Copyright ©2013 3GreenTree Ecosystem Services Ltd./Nature Conservancy of Canada Table of Contents G1. GENERAL SECTION ......................................................................................................................................... 5 G1a. Original Conditions in the Project Area ......................................................................................................... 5 G1b. Community Information .............................................................................................................................. 15 G1c. Biodiversity Information .............................................................................................................................. 26 G2. BASELINE PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 28 G2.1. Baseline Scenario Selection ...................................................................................................................... 29 G2.2. Additionality ............................................................................................................................................... 29 G2.3. Baseline Carbon Stock Changes ............................................................................................................... 29 G2.4. Baseline Scenario Net Impacts on Communities ...................................................................................... 30 G2.5. Baseline Scenario Impacts on Biodiversity ................................................................................................ 35 G3. PROJECT DESIGN AND GOALS .................................................................................................................... 37 G3.1. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 37 G3.2. Project Activities ........................................................................................................................................ 37 G3.3. Project Location ......................................................................................................................................... 39 G3.4. Project Lifetime and GHG Accounting Period ........................................................................................... 39 G3.5. Project Risks .............................................................................................................................................. 39 G3.6. Maintenance of High Conservation Values ............................................................................................... 40 G3.7. Post-Project Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Benefits .................................................................... 40 G3.8. Community Consultation ........................................................................................................................... 41 G3.9 Communication of the CCBA Comment Period .......................................................................................... 41 G3.10 Complaint Hearing and Conflict Resolution .............................................................................................. 41 G3.11 Project Funding ........................................................................................................................................ 41 G4. MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND BEST PRACTICES .................................................................................... 42 G4.1. Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................................ 42 G4.2. Management Team Expertise ................................................................................................................... 42 G4.3. Orientation and Training ............................................................................................................................ 43 G4.4. Equal Employment Opportunities .............................................................................................................. 43 G4.5. Workers Rights .......................................................................................................................................... 44 G4.6. Worker Safety ............................................................................................................................................ 44 G4.7. Financial Health ......................................................................................................................................... 44 G5. LEGAL STATUS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS ................................................................................................... 44 G5.1. Relevant Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................................ 44 G5.2. Local Authority Approval ............................................................................................................................ 46 G5.3. Other Ownership Encroachment ............................................................................................................... 46 G5.4. Relocation of Affected Peoples ................................................................................................................. 46 G5.5. Illegal Activities .......................................................................................................................................... 46 G5.6. Carbon Title Rights .................................................................................................................................... 46 CLIMATE SECTION ................................................................................................................................................ 47 CL1. Net Positive Climate Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 47 CL2. Offsite Climate Impacts (‘Leakage’) ............................................................................................................ 49 CL3. Climate Impact Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 50 COMMUNITY SECTION ......................................................................................................................................... 50 CM1. Net Positive Community Impacts ............................................................................................................... 50 CM2. Offsite Stakeholder Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 57 CM3. Community Impact Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 57 BIODIVERSITY SECTION ...................................................................................................................................... 59 B1. Net Positive Biodiversity Impacts .................................................................................................................. 59 2 B2. Offsite Biodiversity Impacts ........................................................................................................................... 61 B3. Biodiversity Impact Monitoring ...................................................................................................................... 62 GOLD LEVEL SECTION ......................................................................................................................................... 64 GL3. Exceptional Biodiversity Benefits ................................................................................................................ 64 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................................................ 65 List of Tables: Table 1 - Darkwoods Property Legal Descriptions and Parcel Identifiers ................................................. 7 Table 2 - Darkwoods Forest Cover Description by Leading Species, Productivity Class, Age Group, and Operability ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 3 - Southern Interior Forest District Economic Diversity and Forest Vulnerability Indices (BC Stats, 2009a) ................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 4 - Select BC Community Income Dependencies by Economic Sector ........................................ 22 Table 5 - Key Harvesting Employment Variables Within the Project Zone (Lefebvre, 2008; SIBAC, 2009) ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Table 6 - Definitions of Threats Associated with Biodiversity on Darkwoods ......................................... 27 Table 7 - Select Economic Parameters
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eastslope Sculpin (Cottus Sp.) in Alberta
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the "Eastslope" Sculpin Cottus sp. in Canada St. Mary and Milk River populations THREATENED 2005 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2005. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the "eastslope" sculpin (St. Mary and Milk River population) Cottus sp. in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 30 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: This document is based on a report by Susan M. Pollard prepared for Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division and the Alberta Conservation Association. The original report was published as Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 51, February 2004, and is entitled Status of the St. Mary Shorthead Sculpin (provisionally Cottus bairdi punctulatus) in Alberta. Funding for the preparation of the original status report was provided by the Alberta Conservation Association and the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development. This document was overseen and edited by Bob Campbell, the COSEWIC Freshwater Fish Species Specialist Subcommittee Co- chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le chabot du versant est (populations des rivières St.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorthead Sculpin (Cottus Confusus) Is a Small, Freshwater Sculpin (Cottidae)
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Shorthead Sculpin Cottus confusus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2010 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Shorthead Sculpin Cottus confusus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 28 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Don McPhail for writing the provisional status report on the Shorthead Sculpin, Cottus confusus, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim status and 2-month interim status reports were overseen by Eric Taylor, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee Co- chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le chabot à tête courte (Cottus confusus) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Shorthead Sculpin — illustration by Diana McPhail Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/251-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18592-7 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2010 Common name Shorthead Sculpin Scientific name Cottus confusus Status Special Concern Reason for designation In Canada, this small freshwater fish is endemic to the Columbia River basin where it has a very small geographic distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Columbia Sculpin (Cottus Hubbsi) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act FINAL Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Columbia Sculpin (Cottus hubbsi) in Canada Columbia Sculpin 2012 About the Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003, and one of its purposes is “to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened.” What is a species of special concern? Under SARA, a species of special concern is a wildlife species that could become threatened or endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. Species of special concern are included in the SARA List of Wildlife Species at Risk. What is a management plan? Under SARA, a management plan is an action-oriented planning document that identifies the conservation activities and land use measures needed to ensure, at a minimum, that a species of special concern does not become threatened or endangered. For many species, the ultimate aim of the management plan will be to alleviate human threats and remove the species from the List of Wildlife Species at Risk. The plan sets goals and objectives, identifies threats, and indicates the main areas of activities to be undertaken to address those threats. Management plan development is mandated under Sections 65–72 of SARA (http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/approach/act/default_e.cfm). A management plan has to be developed within three years after the species is added to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surfperches)
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin No. 88. A Revision of the Family Embiotocidae (The Surfperches) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qx7s3cn Author Tarp, Fred Harald Publication Date 1952-10-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME BUREAU OF MARINE FISHERIES FISH BULLETIN No. 88 A Revision of the Family Embiotocidae (The Surfperches) By FRED HARALD TARP October, 1952 1 2 3 4 1. INTRODUCTION* The viviparous surfperches (family Embiotocidae) are familiar to anglers and commercial fishermen alike, along the Pacific Coast of the United States. Until the present, 21 species have been recognized in the world. Two additional forms are herein described as new. Twenty species are found in California alone, although not all are restricted to that area. The family, because of its surf-loving nature, is characteristic of inshore areas, although by no means restricted to this niche. Two species are generally found in tidepools, while one, Zalembius rosaceus, occurs in fairly deep waters along the continental shelf. Because of their rather close relationships, the Embiotocidae have been a problem for the angler, the ecologist, the parasitologist, and others, to identify and even, occasionally, have proved to be difficult for the professional ichthy- ologist to determine. An attempt has been made in this revision, to remedy this situation by including full descrip- tions based on populations, rather than on individual specimens, and by including a key which, it is hoped, will prove adequate for juvenile specimens, as well as for adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Speckled Dace, Rhinichthys Osculus, in Canada, Prepared Under Contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada ENDANGERED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 51 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 27 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). COSEWIC 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 36 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Peden, A. 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-36 pp. Peden, A.E. 1980. COSEWIC status report on the speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 1-13 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrea Smith (Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd.) for writing the status report on the Speckled Dace, Rhinichthys osculus, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Sculpin (Cottus Hubbsi) Is a Small, Freshwater Sculpin (Cottidae)
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Columbia Sculpin Cottus hubbsi in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2010 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Columbia Sculpin Cottus hubbsi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 32 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Don McPhail for writing the provisional status report on the Columbia Sculpin, Cottus hubbsi, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim status report and 2-month interim status reports were overseen by Dr. Eric Taylor, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le chabot du Columbia (Cottus hubbsi) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Columbia Sculpin — illustration by Diana McPhail. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/268-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18590-3 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2010 Common name Columbia Sculpin Scientific name Cottus hubbsi Status Special Concern Reason for designation In Canada, this small freshwater fish is endemic to the Columbia River basin where it has a small geographic distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Operating Procedure EAP124, Version 1.4: Vertebrate
    Standard Operating Procedure EAP124, Version 1.4 Watershed Health Monitoring: Standard Operating Procedures for Vertebrate Assemblage Sampling November 2018 Publication 18-03-228 Purpose of this document The Washington State Department of Ecology develops Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to document agency practices related to sampling, field and laboratory analysis, and other aspects of the agency’s technical operations. Publication information This SOP is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1803228.html. Ecology’s Activity Tracker Code for this SOP is 18-052. Contact information For more information contact: Communications Consultant Environmental Assessment Program P.O. Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: 360-407-6764 Washington State Department of Ecology – ecology.wa.gov. Location of Ecology Offices Phone Headquarters, Lacey 360-407-6000 Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 Southwest Regional Office, Lacey 360-407-6300 Central Regional Office, Union Gap 509-575-2490 Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 Any use of product or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the author or the Department of Ecology. To request ADA accommodation for disabilities, or printed materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at 360-407-6764 or visit https://ecology.wa.gov/accessibility. People with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. People with speech disability
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Cottid Recolonization in the Cheakamus River, Bc: Implications for Management
    INVESTIGATING COTTID RECOLONIZATION IN THE CHEAKAMUS RIVER, BC: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT By CAROLINE KOHAR ARMOUR B.Sc., University of Ottawa, 2001 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard .......................................................... Dr. Lenore Newman, MEM Program Head School of Environment and Sustainability .......................................................... Dr. Tom A. Watson, R.P. Bio., P. Biol., Senior Environmental Scientist Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. .......................................................... Dr. Tony Boydell, Director School of Environment and Sustainability ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY February 2010 © Caroline Kohar Armour, 2010 Investigating Cottid Recolonization ii ABSTRACT An estimated 90% of resident sculpin (Cottus asper and C. aleuticus) were impacted by a spill of 45,000 litres of sodium hydroxide, which occurred on the Cheakamus River, British Columbia on August 5, 2005. This study examined sculpin biology, life history, how sculpins are recovering from the impact, and whether they are re-entering the Cheakamus River from the adjacent Squamish and Mamquam Rivers. Sculpins were sampled in the three river systems via minnow trapping and electrofishing. Morphometric data were recorded and fin clips were taken as deoxyribonucleic acid vouchers to validate field species identification and to determine population distinctiveness among the three systems. Populations were not distinct, suggesting recolonization from other rivers is occurring. The data show sculpins will undergo seasonal downstream spawning migrations and also suggest sculpins are opportunistic habitat colonizers. This research bears useful implications for the adaptive management, recovery, and sustainability of sculpins in the Cheakamus River. Investigating Cottid Recolonization iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Sculpin Cottus Hubbsi
    Columbia Sculpin Cottus hubbsi Prepared by Chris Gill, MSc, RPBio Kestrel Consulting Phone: (250) 835-8256 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The following document was compiled based on a literature review of information currently available for this species as of November 25, 2005. This document can be used to assist with the identification of this species and to support the development of management recommendations as they relate to forestry activities. For more information on this species, please refer to the reference section or consult with a Species at Risk specialist. Description1 The Columbia sculpin is a small fish that reaches a maximum 10 to 11 cm in length. It is a typically shaped sculpin with dark mottling on the fins, tail and body. It has 15 pectoral fin rays, 3 preopercular spines and 27-29 lateral line pores. In addition, the lateral line extends into the base of the tail fin2. The Columbia sculpin is morphologically distinct from other sculpins in Canada (with the exception of the Shorthead sculpin which is found in the Arrow Forest District) based on several features. These features include the following: (1) no prickles covering the entire body (i.e., only found behind the pectoral fin); (2) well-developed pelvic fin rays; (3) vomerine and palatine teeth; (4) 11-15 anal fin rays; and (5) an upper preopercular spine is not strongly hooked2. Columbia Sculpin (Cottus hubbsi) Distribution Restricted to a portion of the Columbia drainage; found in the Similkameen River and its tributaries, the Kettle River below Cascade Falls, the Columbia and Kootenay rivers below Arrow Lakes and Kootenay Lake, and the Flathead River and its lower tributaries3.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Land and \Mater Tlse on Fish and Their Habitat Part I
    Alasha Habitat Management Guide Impacts of land and \Mater tlse on Fish and Their Habitat Part I Produced by State of Alasha Department of Fish and Game Division of Habitat Iuneau, Alasha 1986 Olgge BYTHE ATASKADEpAPTMENT OF FISHAND CIAME Contents Achnowledgements v General Introduction 0verview of the Habitat Management Guides Project 3 Introduction to Part 1 7 Purpose 7 Approach 7 Organization of the Volume 8 Users Guide 10 Methods 11 Cross-reference of Activities 13 Activiry Index Marine Fish and Shellfish 31 Freshwater Fish 61 Impact Index Marine Fish and Shellfish 119 Freshwater Fi sh i51 Appendices A. Di rectory of Reviewers and Contributors 207 B. Land and Water Uses and Development Types 208 C. Descriptions of Activities 209 D. Fish Impact Categories 2L0 E. Correction Form zLl F. Additional References 213 Map 1. The six regions of the Alaska Habitat Management Guides 5 444 Figtrres 1. Types of narratives and maps produced by the Alaska Habitat Management Guides Project 6 t. General hierarch'ical relationships of land and water uses, activ'ities and impacts 9 Itables 1. Activities involved'in each land or water use or development type 10 2. Sunmary of the I iterature for defined activi tyl impact categories: marine fish and shellfish 32 3. Summary of the I iterature for defined activity/impact categories: freshwater fi sh 62 4. Summary of the I iterature for defined activity/impact categories: marine fish and shellfish I20 5. Sununary of the I iterature for defined activity/impact categories: freshwaier fish L52 Achnowledgements This project is under the djrection of the Conmissioner of the Department of j Di the Divi s'ion of Habi tat F sh and- Game, Don W.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Field Sampling Method for Monitoring the Occurrence and Relative Abundance of the Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus Sp.) in Canada
    STANDARDIZED FIELD SAMPLING METHOD FOR MONITORING THE OCCURRENCE AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCULPIN (COTTUS SP.) IN CANADA Camille J. Macnaughton, Tyana Rudolfsen, Doug A. Watkinson, and Eva C. Enders Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ecosystems and Oceans Science Central and Arctic Region Freshwater Institute Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6 2019 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3313 1 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique.
    [Show full text]