DOCSLIB.ORG

Directional Gain of IEEE 802.11 MIMO Devices Employing Cyclic Delay Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Directional Gain of IEEE 802.11 MIMO Devices Employing Cyclic Delay Diversity Directional Gain of IEEE 802.11 MIMO Devices Employing Cyclic Delay Diversity April 5, 2013 Technical Research Branch Laboratory Division Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission OET Report Prepared by: FCC/OET 13TR1003 Stephen R. Martin ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is grateful to the following Federal Communications Commission employees for reviewing a draft of this document and providing many suggestions that improved the final version: Martin Doczkat, Mark Settle, and Robert Pavlak. i This page is intentionally blank ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Directional Gain in the FCC Rules ........................................................................................................................... 1 Meaning of Directional Gain .................................................................................................................................... 2 Array Gain ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 CYCLIC DELAY DIVERSITY (CDD) IN IEEE 802.11 ............................................................................................. 3 MODELING .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Array Configurations for FCC Analysis of 802.11 Cyclic Delay Diversity ............................................................. 5 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Narrowband Beam Patterns ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Broadband Beam Patterns ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Array Gain Versus Frequency .................................................................................................................................. 7 Array Gain Versus Bandwidth .................................................................................................................................. 9 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A - MATLAB CODE ........................................................................................................................... A-1 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Array Configurations for FCC Analysis of 802.11 Cyclic Delay Diversity ................................................ 16 Figure 2. Narrowband Azimuth Beam Patterns (2400-2500 MHz) of Four-Antenna Rectangle-2 ............................ 17 Figure 3. Narrowband Azimuth Beam Patterns (5700-5800 MHz) of Four-Antenna Rectangle-2 ............................ 18 Figure 4. Narrowband Azimuth Beam Patterns (5700-5800 MHz) for Eleven Array Configurations ....................... 19 Figure 5. Broadband 16.6-MHz Azimuth Beam Patterns (5700-5800 MHz) of Four-Antenna Rectangle-2 ............. 23 Figure 6. Array Gain Versus Center Frequency (5700-5800 MHz) For an Array With Two Antennas ..................... 24 Figure 7. Array Gain Versus Center Frequency (5700-5800 MHz) For Arrays With Four Antennas ........................ 25 Figure 8. Array Gain Versus Center Frequency (5700-5800 MHz) For Arrays with Five Antennas ......................... 26 Figure 9. Array Gain Versus Center Frequency (5700-5800 MHz) For Arrays With Eight Antennas ....................... 27 Figure 10. Array Gain Versus Center Frequency in Two Frequency Bands For 5-Antenna Square-1 ....................... 28 Figure 11. Maximum Array Gain Across 5700-5800 MHz Center Frequency Span Versus Bandwidth ................... 29 Figure 12. Median Array Gain Across 5700-5800 MHz Center Frequency Span Versus Bandwidth ........................ 29 Figure 13. Maximum Array Gain Versus Bandwidth in Two Frequency Bands For 5-Antenna Square-1 ................ 30 Figure 14. Median Array Gain Versus Bandwidth in Two Frequency Bands For 5-Antenna Square-1 ..................... 30 Figure 15. Maximum and Median Array Gains in 1 MHz Bandwidth ....................................................................... 31 Figure 16. Maximum and Median Broadband Array Gains for 20-MHz Channels.................................................... 31 Figure 17. IEEE 802.11 Channels that Straddle FCC Band Boundaries .................................................................... 32 Figure 18. Maximum Array Gain Versus Bandwidth With Straddle-Channel Bandwidths Identified ....................... 32 TABLES Table 1. Short Cyclic Delays Adopted by IEEE 802.11 for Non-High-Throughput Fields ......................................... 3 Table 2. Long Cyclic Delays Adopted by IEEE 802.11 for High-Throughput Fields .................................................. 3 iii This page is intentionally blank iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents the theoretical modeling behind the formulas employed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Laboratory for determining directional gain of radio transmissions from IEEE 802.11-compliant wireless local area network (LAN) devices when transmitting on multiple antennas in modes employing cyclic delay diversity (CDD). The new formulas are included in the guidance for computing directional gain in Knowledge Database (KDB) Publication 662911, “Emissions Testing of Transmitters with Multiple Outputs in the Same Band (e.g., MIMO, Smart Antenna, etc)”.1 Many of the FCC’s technical rules for “intentional radiators”, i.e., devices that intentionally transmit signals on radio frequencies, specify limits on maximum total transmit power and on maximum power spectral density that are dependent on the directional gain associated with those transmissions. This is true of the rules under which most IEEE 802.11-compliant wireless LAN devices operate (sections 15.247 and 15.407 of the FCC Rules)2 as well as a number of other rules. For devices that have a single transmitter output driving an antenna, the directional gain is simply that of the antenna. However, devices employing multiple input multiple output (MIMO) technology can achieve additional directional gain, called array gain, beyond the gains of the individual antennas by transmitting signals that are mutually correlated. In some cases this additional gain is intentionally created to improve performance, as is the case when transmit beamforming is employed. In other cases, as with cyclic delay diversity (CDD), the array gain is not intentional. Previous FCC guidance for determining directional gain of MIMO transmissions required that the maximum array gain that is theoretically possible for correlated transmissions be assumed whenever the transmissions exhibited any mutual correlation. That maximum possible array gain is given by 10 log(NANT) dB, where NANT is the number of transmit antennas. In some cases this approach was known to overestimate array gain, resulting in greater reductions in transmit power than would be required if a more accurate way of computing array gain were available. This report describes the development by the FCC Laboratory of a more accurate way to estimate array gain for the specific case of cyclic delay diversity (CDD) transmissions by devices operating under the IEEE 802.11 standard. The new techniques are based on theoretical calculations of beam patterns and the resulting array gains for twelve sample antenna array configurations with simulated transmissions using the CDD delays specified in the IEEE 802.11 standard. Based on the modeled array gain results as a function of transmit signal bandwidth, the new approach requires the continued use of the 10 log(NANT) formula when computing narrowband array gain for determining the required reductions in power spectral density of transmissions. However, a new formula computes broadband array gain as either 0 dB or 3 dB depending on transmit signal bandwidth and number of transmit antennas. The broadband array gain value is used to compute array gain for determining required reductions in transmit power. 1 Available at www.fcc.gov/labhelp by clicking “Major Guidance Publications” or by clicking “Advanced KDB Search” and entering the publication number. The array gain computations described in this technical report were implemented in version v01r01 of KDB Publication 662911, dated September 26, 2012. 2 The FCC rules are found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations (abbreviated as 47 CFR), available at http://www.ecfr.gov. Sections 15.247 and 15.407 are contained within Part 15, which governs unlicensed radio frequency devices. v This page is intentionally blank vi Directional Gain of IEEE 802.11 MIMO Devices Employing Cyclic Delay Diversity INTRODUCTION This report documents the theoretical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radiometry and the Friis Transmission Equation Joseph A
    Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation Joseph A. Shaw Citation: Am. J. Phys. 81, 33 (2013); doi: 10.1119/1.4755780 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4755780 View Table of Contents: http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/AJPIAS/v81/i1 Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers Related Articles The reciprocal relation of mutual inductance in a coupled circuit system Am. J. Phys. 80, 840 (2012) Teaching solar cell I-V characteristics using SPICE Am. J. Phys. 79, 1232 (2011) A digital oscilloscope setup for the measurement of a transistor’s characteristic curves Am. J. Phys. 78, 1425 (2010) A low cost, modular, and physiologically inspired electronic neuron Am. J. Phys. 78, 1297 (2010) Spreadsheet lock-in amplifier Am. J. Phys. 78, 1227 (2010) Additional information on Am. J. Phys. Journal Homepage: http://ajp.aapt.org/ Journal Information: http://ajp.aapt.org/about/about_the_journal Top downloads: http://ajp.aapt.org/most_downloaded Information for Authors: http://ajp.dickinson.edu/Contributors/contGenInfo.html Downloaded 07 Jan 2013 to 153.90.120.11. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation Joseph A. Shaw Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717 (Received 1 July 2011; accepted 13 September 2012) To more effectively tailor courses involving antennas, wireless communications, optics, and applied electromagnetics to a mixed audience of engineering and physics students, the Friis transmission equation—which quantifies the power received in a free-space communication link—is developed from principles of optical radiometry and scalar diffraction.
    [Show full text]
  • 25. Antennas II
    25. Antennas II Radiation patterns Beyond the Hertzian dipole - superposition Directivity and antenna gain More complicated antennas Impedance matching Reminder: Hertzian dipole The Hertzian dipole is a linear d << antenna which is much shorter than the free-space wavelength: V(t) Far field: jk0 r j t 00Id e ˆ Er,, t j sin 4 r Radiation resistance: 2 d 2 RZ rad 3 0 2 where Z 000 377 is the impedance of free space. R Radiation efficiency: rad (typically is small because d << ) RRrad Ohmic Radiation patterns Antennas do not radiate power equally in all directions. For a linear dipole, no power is radiated along the antenna’s axis ( = 0). 222 2 I 00Idsin 0 ˆ 330 30 Sr, 22 32 cr 0 300 60 We’ve seen this picture before… 270 90 Such polar plots of far-field power vs. angle 240 120 210 150 are known as ‘radiation patterns’. 180 Note that this picture is only a 2D slice of a 3D pattern. E-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the electric field vectors. H-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the magnetic field vectors. Radiation patterns – Hertzian dipole z y E-plane radiation pattern y x 3D cutaway view H-plane radiation pattern Beyond the Hertzian dipole: longer antennas All of the results we’ve derived so far apply only in the situation where the antenna is short, i.e., d << . That assumption allowed us to say that the current in the antenna was independent of position along the antenna, depending only on time: I(t) = I0 cos(t) no z dependence! For longer antennas, this is no longer true.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Application of a New Planar Balun
    DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF A NEW PLANAR BALUN Younes Mohamed Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2014 APPROVED: Shengli Fu, Major Professor and Interim Chair of the Department of Electrical Engineering Hualiang Zhang, Co-Major Professor Hyoung Soo Kim, Committee Member Costas Tsatsoulis, Dean of the College of Engineering Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Mohamed, Younes. Design and Application of a New Planar Balun. Master of Science (Electrical Engineering), May 2014, 41 pp., 2 tables, 29 figures, references, 21 titles. The baluns are the key components in balanced circuits such balanced mixers, frequency multipliers, push–pull amplifiers, and antennas. Most of these applications have become more integrated which demands the baluns to be in compact size and low cost. In this thesis, a new approach about the design of planar balun is presented where the 4-port symmetrical network with one port terminated by open circuit is first analyzed by using even- and odd-mode excitations. With full design equations, the proposed balun presents perfect balanced output and good input matching and the measurement results make a good agreement with the simulations. Second, Yagi-Uda antenna is also introduced as an entry to fully understand the quasi-Yagi antenna. Both of the antennas have the same design requirements and present the radiation properties. The arrangement of the antenna’s elements and the end-fire radiation property of the antenna have been presented. Finally, the quasi-Yagi antenna is used as an application of the balun where the proposed balun is employed to feed a quasi-Yagi antenna.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Profile Wideband Antennas Based on Tightly Coupled Dipole
    Low-Profile Wideband Antennas Based on Tightly Coupled Dipole and Patch Elements Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Erdinc Irci, B.S., M.S. Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John L. Volakis, Advisor Kubilay Sertel, Co-advisor Robert J. Burkholder Fernando L. Teixeira c Copyright by Erdinc Irci 2011 Abstract There is strong interest to combine many antenna functionalities within a single, wideband aperture. However, size restrictions and conformal installation requirements are major obstacles to this goal (in terms of gain and bandwidth). Of particular importance is bandwidth; which, as is well known, decreases when the antenna is placed closer to the ground plane. Hence, recent efforts on EBG and AMC ground planes were aimed at mitigating this deterioration for low-profile antennas. In this dissertation, we propose a new class of tightly coupled arrays (TCAs) which exhibit substantially broader bandwidth than a single patch antenna of the same size. The enhancement is due to the cancellation of the ground plane inductance by the capacitance of the TCA aperture. This concept of reactive impedance cancellation was motivated by the ultrawideband (UWB) current sheet array (CSA) introduced by Munk in 2003. We demonstrate that as broad as 7:1 UWB operation can be achieved for an aperture as thin as λ/17 at the lowest frequency. This is a 40% larger wideband performance and 35% thinner profile as compared to the CSA. Much of the dissertation’s focus is on adapting the conformal TCA concept to small and very low-profile finite arrays.
    [Show full text]
  • Patch Antenna Array for RF Energy Harvesting Systems in 2.4 Ghz WLAN Frequency Band
    Published by : International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) http://www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 9 Issue 05, May-2020 Patch Antenna Array for RF Energy Harvesting Systems in 2.4 GHz WLAN Frequency Band Akash Kumar Gupta V. Praveen, V. Swetha Sri, Department of ECE CH. Nagavinay Kumar, B. Kishore Raghu Institute of Technology UG-Student, Department of ECE Raghu Visakhapatnam, India Institute of Technology Visakhapatnam, India Abstract—In present days, technology have been emerging harvesting topologies that operates low power devices. It has with significant importance mainly in wireless local area network. three stages receiving antenna, energy conversion into DC In this Energy harvesting is playing a key role. The RF Energy output, utilization of output of output in low power applications. harvesting is the collection of small amounts of ambient energy to power wireless devices, Especially, radio frequency (RF) energy II. RADIO FREQUENCY ENERGY HARVESTING has interesting key attributes that make it very attractive for low- power consumer electronics and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). FOR MICROSTRIP ANTENNA Commercial RF transmitting stations like Wi-Fi, or radar signals Microstrip patch antenna is a metallic patch which is may provide ambient RF energy. Throughout this paper, a specific fabricated on a dielectric substrate. The microstrip patch emphasis is on RFEH, as a green technology that is suitable for antenna is layered structure of ground plane as bottom layer solving power supply to WLAN node-related problems throughout and dielectric substrate as medium layer and radiating patch difficult environments or locations that cannot be reached. For RF harvesting RF signals are extracted using antennas.in this work to as top layer.
    [Show full text]
  • RF Exposure Evaluation Declaration
    MRT Technology (Taiwan) Co., Ltd Report No.: 2007TW0001-U3 Phone: +886-3-3288388 Report Version: V01 Web: www.mrt-cert.com Issue Date: 07-10-2020 RF Exposure Evaluation Declaration FCC ID: TE7AX3200 APPLICANT: TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. Application Type: Certification Product: AX3200 Tri-Band Wi-Fi 6 Router Model No.: Archer AX3200 Trademark: tp-link FCC Classification: Digital Transmission System (DTS) Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (NII) Test Procedure(s): KDB 447498 D01v06 Test Date: July 04, 2020 Reviewed By: ( Paddy Chen ) Approved By: (Chenz Ker) The test results relate only to the samples tested. The test results shown in the test report are traceable to the national/international standards through the calibration of the equipment and evaluated measurement uncertainty herein. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of MRT Technology (Taiwan) Co., Ltd. Page Number: 1 of 7 Report No.: 2007TW0001-U3 Revision History Report No. Version Description Issue Date Note 2007TW0001-U3 Rev. 01 Initial report 07-10-2020 Valid Page Number: 2 of 7 Report No.: 2007TW0001-U3 1. PRODUCT INFORMATION 1.1. Equipment Description Product Name AX3200 Tri-Band Wi-Fi 6 Router Model No. Archer AX3200 Brand Name: tp-link Wi-Fi Specification: 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax 1.2. Description of Available Antennas Antenna Frequency TX Number of Max Beamforming CDD Directional Gain Type Band (MHz) Paths spatial Antenna Directional (dBi) streams Gain Gain For Power For PSD (dBi) (dBi) 2412 ~ 2462 2 1 3.52 6.53 3.52 6.53 Monopole 5150 ~ 5250 2 1 3.54 6.55 3.54 6.55 Antenna 5725 ~ 5850 4 1 3.20 9.22 3.20 9.22 Note: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Recent Phased Arrays for Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communication
    sensors Review Review of Recent Phased Arrays for Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communication Aqeel Hussain Naqvi and Sungjoon Lim * School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 221, Heukseok-Dong, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 156-756, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-820-5827; Fax: +82-2-812-7431 Received: 27 July 2018; Accepted: 18 September 2018; Published: 21 September 2018 Abstract: Owing to the rapid growth in wireless data traffic, millimeter-wave (mm-wave) communications have shown tremendous promise and are considered an attractive technique in fifth-generation (5G) wireless communication systems. However, to design robust communication systems, it is important to understand the channel dynamics with respect to space and time at these frequencies. Millimeter-wave signals are highly susceptible to blocking, and they have communication limitations owing to their poor signal attenuation compared with microwave signals. Therefore, by employing highly directional antennas, co-channel interference to or from other systems can be alleviated using line-of-sight (LOS) propagation. Because of the ability to shape, switch, or scan the propagating beam, phased arrays play an important role in advanced wireless communication systems. Beam-switching, beam-scanning, and multibeam arrays can be realized at mm-wave frequencies using analog or digital system architectures. This review article presents state-of-the-art phased arrays for mm-wave mobile terminals (MSs) and base stations (BSs), with an emphasis on beamforming arrays. We also discuss challenges and strategies used to address unfavorable path loss and blockage issues related to mm-wave applications, which sets future directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Millimeter-Wave Evolution for 5G Cellular Networks
    1 Millimeter-wave Evolution for 5G Cellular Networks Kei SAKAGUCHI†a), Gia Khanh TRAN††, Hidekazu SHIMODAIRA††, Shinobu NANBA†††, Toshiaki SAKURAI††††, Koji TAKINAMI†††††, Isabelle SIAUD*, Emilio Calvanese STRINATI**, Antonio CAPONE***, Ingolf KARLS****, Reza AREFI****, and Thomas HAUSTEIN***** SUMMARY Triggered by the explosion of mobile traffic, 5G (5th Generation) cellular network requires evolution to increase the system rate 1000 times higher than the current systems in 10 years. Motivated by this common problem, there are several studies to integrate mm-wave access into current cellular networks as multi-band heterogeneous networks to exploit the ultra-wideband aspect of the mm-wave band. The authors of this paper have proposed comprehensive architecture of cellular networks with mm-wave access, where mm-wave small cell basestations and a conventional macro basestation are connected to Centralized-RAN (C-RAN) to effectively operate the system by enabling power efficient seamless handover as well as centralized resource control including dynamic cell structuring to match the limited coverage of mm-wave access with high traffic user locations via user-plane/control-plane splitting. In this paper, to prove the effectiveness of the proposed 5G cellular networks with mm-wave access, system level simulation is conducted by introducing an expected future traffic model, a measurement based mm-wave propagation model, and a centralized cell association algorithm by exploiting the C-RAN architecture. The numerical results show the effectiveness of the proposed network to realize 1000 times higher system rate than the current network in 10 years which is not achieved by the small cells using commonly considered 3.5 GHz band.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Extended Aperture Log-Periodic Array Part 1: the Extended Element and the Standard LPDA
    Notes on the Extended Aperture Log-Periodic Array Part 1: The Extended Element and the Standard LPDA L. B. Cebik, W4RNL In the R.S.G.B. Bulletin for July, 1961, F. J. H. Charman, G6CJ, resurrected a 1938 idea for antenna elements developed by E. C. Cork of E.M.I. Electronics. The elements are variously called loaded or extended wire elements. Charman increased the length of a center-fed wire to 1-λ while still obtaining a bi-directional pattern and a usable feedpoint impedance. He inserted capacitances between the center ½-λ section and the outer sections, thereby changing the current distribution. After a brief flurry of HF and VHF antenna ideas, the technique fell into obscurity, although the basic concept is related to certain collinear designs that use an inductance and a space between sections to obtain the correct phasing. I am indebted to Roger Paskvan, WA0IUJ, for sending me the relevant RSGB materials on the Charman element. In the 1970s, the element reappeared in a new garb as integral to the 1973 U.S. patent for “Extended Aperture Log-Periodic and Quasi-Log-Periodic Antennas and Arrays” received by Robert L. Tanner, founder and technical director of TCI, Inc. (U.S. patent 3,765,022, Oct. 9, 1973) The ideas found their way into TCI’s Model 510 and Model 512 5-30-MHz extended aperture log-periodic dipole arrays (EALPDAs). The arrays may have been in the TCI book since Tanner’s filing date (1971) or shortly thereafter, although TCI had previously produced other versions of the log-periodic dipole array (LPDA).
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb
    ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb: 1. The Gain of an antenna with losses is given by: Where BW are the elev & az another is: 2 and N 4B0A 0 ' Efficiency beamwidths in degrees. G • Where For approximating an antenna pattern with: 2 A ' Physical aperture area ' X 0 8 G (1) A rectangle; X'41253,0 '0.7 ' BW BW typical 8 wavelength N 2 ' ' (2) An ellipsoid; X 52525,0typical 0.55 2. Gain of rectangular X-Band Aperture G = 1.4 LW Where: Length (L) and Width (W) are in cm 3. Gain of Circular X-Band Aperture 3 dB Beamwidth G = d20 Where: d = antenna diameter in cm 0 = aperture efficiency .5 power 4. Gain of an isotropic antenna radiating in a uniform spherical pattern is one (0 dB). .707 voltage 5. Antenna with a 20 degree beamwidth has a 20 dB gain. 6. 3 dB beamwidth is approximately equal to the angle from the peak of the power to Peak power Antenna the first null (see figure at right). to first null Radiation Pattern 708 7. Parabolic Antenna Beamwidth: BW ' d Where: BW = antenna beamwidth; 8 = wavelength; d = antenna diameter. The antenna equations which follow relate to Figure 1 as a typical antenna. In Figure 1, BWN is the azimuth beamwidth and BW2 is the elevation beamwidth. Beamwidth is normally measured at the half-power or -3 dB point of the main lobe unless otherwise specified. See Glossary. The gain or directivity of an antenna is the ratio of the radiation BWN BW2 intensity in a given direction to the radiation intensity averaged over Azimuth and Elevation Beamwidths all directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Pattern, Gain, and Directivity James Mclean, Robert Sutton, Rob Hoffman, TDK RF Solutions
    Interpreting Antenna Performance Parameters for EMC Applications: Part 2: Radiation Pattern, Gain, and Directivity James McLean, Robert Sutton, Rob Hoffman, TDK RF Solutions This article is the second in a three-part tutorial series covering antenna terminology. As noted in the first part, a great deal of effort has been made over the years to standardize antenna terminology. The de facto standard is the IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas, published in 1983. However, the EMC community has developed its own distinct vernacular which contains terms not included in the IEEE standard. In the first part of this series, we discussed radiation efficiency and input impedance match. In the second part of this series, we will discuss antenna field regions and antenna gain and how they relate to EMC measurements. Geometrical Considerations In order to quantitatively discuss radiation from antennas, it is necessary to first specify a coordinate system for describing the antenna and the associated electromagnetic fields. The most natural coordinate system for this task is the spherical coordinate system. This is because at a sufficient distance from an antenna (or any localized source of electromagnetic radiation), the electromagnetic fields must decay inversely with radial distance from the antenna (see references 1 and 2). Traditional spherical coordinates consist of a radial distance, an elevation angle, and an azimuthal angle as shown in Figure 1. The elevation angle is taken as the angle between a line drawn from the origin to the point and the z axis. The azimuthal angle is taken as the angle between the projection of this line in the x-y plane and the x axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Output SNR Improvement in Array Processing Architectures of WCDMA Systems by Low Side Lobe Beamforming
    Output SNR Improvement in Array Processing Architectures of WCDMA Systems by Low Side Lobe Beamforming * Rajesh Khanna & Rajiv Saxena Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala. * Principal, Rustamji Institute of Technology, BSF Academy, Tekanpur ABSTRACT wanted signal. This is done by placing the nulls in the In Wideband direct sequence code division multiple pattern in the corresponding known directions of these access (WCDMA) same frequency spectrum is shared through interferers and simultaneously steering the main beam in all cells simultaneously, as opposed to TDMA which is used for the direction of the desired signal. This method of beam most 2nd generation systems. In a WCDMA system all forming is known as Null Beam Forming [1]. Adaptive transmitted signals turn out to be disturbing factors to all arrays, often referred as “Smart antennas”, were suggested other users in the system in the form of interference limiting in the early 1960’s and proved to be useful to cancel the system capacity. To suppress the amount of interference, directional interfering signals, improving the performance fast and reliable interference controlling algorithms must be of cellular wireless communications systems [3]. An employed in next generation systems. In this paper it is shown adaptive array with optimum weight vector can be used for that antenna arrays with steer able low side lobes can reduce null beamforming. The flexibility of array weighting to get interference in WCDMA can increase the system capacity and the desired array pattern can be exploited to cancel output signal to noise ratio of the array processing directional sources operating even at the same frequency architecture.
    [Show full text]