DOCSLIB.ORG

ETSU-R-97 Guidance Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ETSU-R-97 Guidance Document THE ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF NOISE FROM WIND FARMS The Working Group on Noise from Wind Turbines Final Report September l996 This report was drawn up under the direction of the Noise Working Group. While the information contained in this report is given in good faith, it is issued strictly on the basis that any person or entity relying on it does so entirely at their own risk, and without the benefit of any warranty or commitment whatsoever on the part of the individuals or organisations involved in the report as to the veracity or accuracy of any facts or statements contained in this report. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU, the Department of Trade and Industry or any of the other participating organisations. PREFACE This report describes the findings of a Working Group on Wind Turbine Noise. The aim of the Working Group was to provide information and advice to developers and planners on the environmental assessment of noise from wind turbines. While the DTI facilitated the establishment of this Noise Working Group this report is not a report of Government and should not be thought of in any way as replacing the advice contained within relevant Government guidance. The report represents the consensus view of the group of experts listed below who between them have a breadth and depth of experience in assessing and controlling the environmental impact of noise from wind farms. This consensus view has been arrived at through negotiation and compromise and in recognition of the value of achieving a common approach to the assessment of noise from wind turbines. Members of the Noise Working Group: Mr R Meir, Chairman DTI Dr M L Legerton, Secretary ETSU Dr M B Anderson Renewable Energy Systems Mr B Berry National Physical Laboratory Dr A Bullmore Hoare Lea and Partners Mr M Hayes The Hayes McKenzie Partnership Mr M Jiggins Carrick District Council Mr E Leeming The Natural Power Company Ltd Dr P Musgrove National Wind Power Ltd Mr D J Spode North Cornwall District Council Mr H A Thomas Isle of Anglesey County Council MS E Tomalin EcoGen Ltd Mr M Trinick Bond Pearce Solicitors Dr J Warren National Wind Power Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1. This document describes a framework for the measurement of wind farm noise and gives indicative noise levels thought to offer a reasonable degree of protection to wind farm neighbours, without placing unreasonable restrictions on wind farm development or adding unduly to the costs and administrative burdens on wind farm developers or local authorities. The suggested noise limits and their reasonableness have been evaluated with regard to regulating the development of wind energy in the public interest. They have been presented in a manner that makes them a suitable basis for noise-related planning conditions or covenants within an agreement between a developer of a wind farm and the local authority. 2. The noise limits suggested have been derived with reference to: existing standards and guidance relating to noise emissions the need of society for renewable energy sources to reduce the emission of pollutants in pursuance of Government energy policy the ability of manufacturers and developers to meet these noise limits the researches of the Noise Working Group in the UK, Denmark, Holland and Germany the professional experience of members of the Working Group in regulating noise emissions from wind turbines and other noise sources the discussion of the issues at meetings of the Noise Working Group and with others with appropriate experience. 3. The Noise Working Group has sought to protect both the internal and external amenity of the wind farm neighbour. Wind farms are usually sited in the more rural areas of the UK where enjoyment of the external environment can be as important as the environment within the home. 4. The guidance contained within this report refers to the operation of the wind farm and is not appropriate to the construction phase. NOISE LIMITS 5. The Noise Working Group recommends that the current practice on controlling wind farm noise by the application of noise limits at the nearest noise-sensitive properties is the most appropriate approach. This approach has the advantage that the limits can directly reflect the existing environment at the nearest properties and the impact that the wind farm may have on this environment. 6. Given that one of the aims of imposing noise limits is to protect the internal environment, one might consider it appropriate to set these limits and hence monitoring locations at positions within the building. There are, however, some practicalities to take into consideration which lead us to believe that the current practice of setting external limits on noise is the more sensible approach; these factors are described in detail in Chapter 6 of the full report. 7. The noise limits applied to protect the external amenity should only apply to those areas of the property which are frequently used for relaxation or activities for which a quiet environment is highly desirable. 8. The Noise Working Group considers that absolute noise limits applied at a11 wind speeds are not suited to wind farms in typical UK locations and that limits set relative to the background noise are more appropriate in the majority of cases. 9. Only by measuring the background noise over a range of wind speeds will it be possible to evaluate the impact of turbine noise, which also varies with wind speed, on the local environment. 10. The Noise Working Group is of the opinion that one should only seek to place limits on noise over a range of wind speeds up to 12dswhen measured at 10m height on the wind farm site. There are four reasons for restricting the noise limits to this range of wind speed: Wind speeds are not often measured at wind speeds greater than 12dsat 10m height Reliable measurements of background noise levels and turbine noise will be difficult to make in high winds Turbine manufacturers are unlikely to be able to provide information on sound power levels at such high wind speeds for similar reasons If a wind farm meets noise limits at wind speeds lower than 12ds it is most unlikely to cause any greater loss of amenity at higher wind speeds 11. The recommendation of the Noise Working Group is that, generally, the noise limits should be set relative to the existing background noise at nearest noise-sensitive properties and that the limits should reflect the variation in both turbine source noise and background noise with wind speed. We have also considered whether the low noise limits which this could imply in particularly quiet areas are appropriate and have concluded that it is not necessary to use a margin above background approach in such low-noise environments. This would be unduly restrictive on developments which are recognised as having wider national and global benefits. Such low limits are, in any event, not necessary in order to offer a reasonable degree of protection to the wind farm neighbour. 12. Separate noise limits should apply for day-time and for night-time. The reason for this is that during the night the protection of external amenity becomes less important and the emphasis should be on preventing sleep disturbance. Day-time noise limits will be derived from background noise data taken during quiet periods of the day and similarly the night-time limits will be derived from background noise data collected during the night. Quiet day-time periods are defined as: All evenings from 6pm to l lpm, plus Saturday afternoon from lpm to 6pm, plus all day Sunday, 7am to 6pm. Night-time is defined as 1lpm to 7am. 13. Consideration has also be given to circumstances where a more simplified approach, based on a fixed limit, may be appropriate. 14. The Noise Working Group is agreed that the LMo,,omin descriptor should be used for both the background noise and the wind farm noise, and that when setting limits it should be borne in mind that the L~glJ,~ominof the wind farm is likely to be about 1.5-2.5dB(A) less than the LA^^ measured over the same period. The use of the LA90,10min descriptor for wind farm noise allows reliable measurements to be made without corruption from relatively loud, transitory noise events from other sources. 15. The limits to be proposed relate to free-field (except for ground reflections) measurements in the vicinity of noise-sensitive properties. 16. The Noise Working Group is of the opinion that absolute noise limits and margins above background should relate to the cumulative effect of all wind turbines in the area contributing to the noise received at the properties in question. It is clearly unreasonable to suggest that, because a wind farm has been constructed in the vicinity in the past which resulted in increased noise levels at some properties, the residents of those properties are now able to tolerate higher noise levels still. The existing wind farm should not be considered as part of the prevailing background noise. 17. Wind turbines operate day and night dependent upon wind speeds. It will be necessary to acquire background noise data for both day- and night-time periods because: the absolute lower limit is likely to be different for day- and night-time operation the noise limits are to be related to the background noise levels background noise levels may be different in the day than during the night. 18. It is proposed that the background noise levels upon which limits are based and the noise limits themselves are based upon typical rather than extreme values at any given wind speed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
    2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Infrastructure Service Plan 2018-2022 2019/20 Update
    Version 3.4 Transport and infrastructure Service Plan 2018-2022 2019/20 update May 2019 22/05/2019 Service Plan 2018-2022 (2019 update) Version 3.4 P a g e | 2 Introduction by Nigel Blackler Interim Service Director for Transport and Infrastructure The Transport and Infrastructure Service brings together key elements of the Council and works together with partners to help improve the daily lives of the people who live, work and visit Cornwall. This includes making sure communities are connected by reliable, public transport links, to ensure people can access work, health and leisure opportunities. We make sure the road network keeps moving and responds quickly and appropriately to emergency events which threaten this, such as flooding. We work closely with partners in the Rail industry and Highways England to ensure the national rail and road network is fit for purpose for Cornwall’s communities. We also look for opportunities for innovative and efficient improvements to our transport in Cornwall while maintaining links with the rest of the UK. Our service plays an essential role in delivering Cornwall Council’s business plan objectives of: Healthy Cornwall – Encouraging healthy active lifestyles through the provision of walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure is a key focus of the service. The delivery of improved infrastructure connecting key destinations alongside promotion of the health benefits of active travel look to contribute to local and national health targets, improve air quality and the quality of life for Cornwall’s residents and visitors. Homes for Cornwall – Facilitating sustainable housing growth through the delivery of town based Transport Strategies which are underpinned by the principals of Connecting Cornwall: 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to New Values (Information Received As at End of 2010 - Date of Latest Updates Shown for Each Network.)
    G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to new Values (Information received as at End of 2010 - Date of latest updates shown for each network.) DNO [Western Power Distribution - South West Area] total responses as at 05/01/11 User Data Entry Under Frequency Over Frequency Generator Generator Generator Changes Generator Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Agreed to capacity capacity capacity changes Site name Genset implemented capacity unable Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency Comments changes (Y/N) installed agreed to implemented (Y/N) to change (MW) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (MW) change (MW) (MW) Scottish and Southern Energy, Cantelo Nurseries, Bradon Farm, Isle Abbots, Taunton, Somerset Gas Y Y 9.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 47.00 50.50 Following Settings have been applied: 47.5Hz 20s, 47Hz 0.5s, 52Hz 0.5s Bears Down Wind Farm Ltd, Bears Down Wind Farm, St Mawgan, Newquay, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y N 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 47.00 50.50 Contact made. Awaiting info. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz 0.5s) - British Gas Transco, Severn Road, Avonmouth, Bristol Gas Y Y 5.5 5.5 5.5 0.0 47.00 50.50 complete 23/11/10 Cold Northcott Wind Farm Ltd, Cold Northcott, Launceston, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y Y 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 47.00 50.50 Changes completed. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz Connon Bridge Energy Ltd, Landfill Site, East Taphouse, Liskeard, Cornwall 0.5s).Abdul Sattar confirmed complete by email 19/11/10.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1
    South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of Route Strategies 2 Strategic themes 2 Stakeholder engagement 3 Transport Focus 3 2. The route 5 Route Strategy overview map 7 3. Current constraints and challenges 9 A safe and serviceable network 9 More free-flowing network 9 Supporting economic growth 9 An improved environment 10 A more accessible and integrated network 10 Diversionary routes 15 Maintaining the strategic road network 16 4. Current investment plans and growth potential 17 Economic context 17 Innovation 17 Investment plans 17 5. Future challenges and opportunities 23 6. Next steps 31 i R Lon ou don to Scotla te nd East London Or bital and M23 to Gatwick str Lon ategies don to Scotland West London to Wales The division of rou tes for the F progra elixstowe to Midlands mme of route strategies on t he Solent to Midlands Strategic Road Network M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter A1 South West Peninsula London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 A69 North Pen Newccaastlstlee upon Tyne nines Carlisle A1 Sunderland Midlands to Wales and Gloucest M6 ershire North and East Midlands A66 A1(M) A595 South Midlands Middlesbrougugh A66 A174 A590 A19 A1 A64 A585 M6 York Irish S Lee ea M55 ds M65 M1 Preston M606 M621 A56 M62 A63 Kingston upon Hull M62 M61 M58 A1 M1 Liver Manchest A628 A180 North Sea pool er M18 M180 Grimsby M57 A616 A1(M) M53 M62 M60 Sheffield A556 M56 M6 A46 A55 A1 Lincoln A500 Stoke-on-Trent A38 M1 Nottingham
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEDULE a Complex Planning Applications SCHEDULE No: 1 SL
    SCHEDULE A Complex Planning Applications SCHEDULE No: 1 SL/2011/0685 PENNINGTON: STANDISH COTE AND MEAN MOOR, MARTON AND HARLOCK HILL, PENNINGTON, ULVERSTON PROPOSAL: INSTALLATION OF FIVE 99.5M HIGH (2.3Mw) WIND TURBINES, INCORPORATING THE REMOVAL OF FIVE EXISTING Website Link: TURBINES ON http://www.southlakeland.gov.uk/fastweb/detail.asp?AltRef=SL/2011/0685 HARLOCK HILL, FORMATION OF E325395 N479542 28/03/2013 ON-SITE ACCESS TRACKS, ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS AND CARRIAGEWAY WIDENING WORKS MR MATT RUSSELL SUMMARY: This application seeks permission for the removal of the five existing 53 metre high turbines and replacement with five turbines, which would have a maximum height of 99.5 metres to blade tip. It straddles the administrative boundaries of Barrow Borough Council and South Lakeland District Council. Planning applications detailing the full scheme have been submitted to both authorities. Two of the turbines would be located in South Lakeland and three would be within Barrow Borough. A site visit was undertaken in October last year and this application was deferred from the October Committee Meeting so that the developer could submit further information in support of the application relating to the visual impact from dwelling houses. The report at that time recommended refusal for three reasons: adverse impact on the landscape, adverse impact on living conditions and adverse visual impact on the footpath users of Mean Moor. In addition to the additional information submitted by the applicant, two planning appeal decisions have been drawn to the officer’s attention, GlaxoSmithKline have written stating that they wish to source electricity from the turbines and an independent assessment of the LVIA and the Galpin audit report thereon has been received.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wind Turbines Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy
    Development Plans Draft Wind Turbines Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy Wind Turbines Planning Applications Supporting Documents Paper January 2012 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/wind-turbines Blank page Contents Document Page no. Statement of Matters 3 Consultation Statement 7 Evidence Paper 11 Sustainability Appraisal 31 1 Blank page 2 Statement of Matters 3 Blank page 4 Wind Turbines Statement of Matters Title of Document Milton Keynes Council Draft Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy: Wind Turbines Planning Applications (January 2012) Subject matter and geographical Cover and draft SPD The wind turbines document provides guidance for large scale wind turbine planning applications. It seeks to increase protection of residential amenity, as well as the safety of pedestrians and horse riders. The Emerging Policy within the draft SPD introduces a sliding scale of separation distances between residential properties and wind turbines. It also introduces separation distances between bridleways and wind turbines, and footpaths and wind turbines. Period for representations The consultation runs for an eight week period, running from Thursday 2 February 2012 to 5pm Wednesday 28 March 2012. Any person may make representations on the Council’s proposals for the SPD within this consultation period. How to make representations Online: http://miltonkeynes‐consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal Email: development.plans@milton‐keynes.gov.uk Post: Development Plans Milton Keynes Council Civic Office 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Further details of consultation are available at www.milton‐keynes.gov.uk/wind‐turbines Please note that any representations may be accompanied by a request to be notified, at a specified address, of the adoption of the SPD.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayle Masterplan Consultation Report
    Information Classification: PUBLIC Hayle Masterplan Consultation Report December 2019 Information Classification: PUBLIC Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 Statement of Community Involvement ...................................................................... 2 Sustainability Appraisal .............................................................................................. 3 Public Consultation & Responses received .................................................................... 4 Hayle Masterplan Document ...................................................................................... 4 Statutory consultees – Summary of Responses ......................................................... 7 Specific questions – Summary of Responses ........................................................... 13 Appendix 1: Newspaper Notice .................................................................................... 19 Appendix 2: List of Statutory consultees and other organisations .............................. 21 Appendix 3: Consultation Responses ........................................................................... 23 Statutory Consultees ................................................................................................ 23 All other comments .................................................................................................. 39 Hayle Draft Masterplan Consultation Report December 2019 1 Information
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England
    A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross TR010026 5.2 CONSULTATION REPORT APPENDICES PART 3 Planning Act 2008 Section 37(2)(c) Volume 5 August 2018 Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Development Consent Order 201[x] 5.2 CONSULTATION REPORT APPENDICES PART 3 Regulation Number: Section 37(2)(c) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010026 Reference Application Document Reference 5.2 Author: A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version C01 August 2018 Application Issue Appendix Number Appendix Title Appendix M 1 Public Event Exhibition Boards 2 Public Consultation Event Photos Appendix N 1 Poster Appendix O 1 Media Releases Appendix P 1 Pop Up Information Point Photograph Appendix Q 1 Social Media Report Appendix R 1 Copy of Section 48 Notice 2 Scans of Section 48 Notices in Newspapers Appendix S 1 Perranporth Signs Erected During Public Consultation Appendix T 1 Targeted consultation letter sent to PILs on 29 May 2018 2 Letter notifying Cornwall Council of targeted consultation 3 Letter notifying Parish Councils of targeted consultation 4 Letter notifying Sarah Newton MP of targeted consultation 5 Targeted consultation letter sent to PILs on 13 July 2018 Appendix M1 Public Event Exhibition Boards A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Public consultation exhibition 2018 Welcome A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Improving reliability, safety, local life and regional growth Welcome to the A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross consultation, and thank you for your interest in our plans. Currently, journeys on this section of the A30 are delayed. Congestion brings traffic to a standstill and the Cornish economy is being held back.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J – Responses to Q2
    Appendix J – Responses to Q2 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation Number: 37(3)(c) Author: A30 Carland Cross to Chiverton Cross Project Development Team Document EDG0769_PA_PE01_APP J Reference: PI Reference TBC Document Date Version Note 23 July 2015 0 First Issue Highways England & Cornwall Council A30 Carland Cross to Chiverton Cross Public Engagement Report Document Reference: EDG0769_PA_PE01_APP J Issue & Revision Record Revision Date Author Purpose of Issue / Nature of Change 0 23/07/15 DP First Issue This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Highways England or Cornwall Council being obtained. Highways England and Cornwall Council accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Highways England and Cornwall Council for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Highways England and Cornwall Council accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. 2 A30 Carland Cross to Chiverton Cross Public Exhibition March 2015 'Other' Comments Analysis The 'Other' comments listed below contain text that could not be attributed to any of the main themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation & Planning Control Study Work
    Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation & Planning Control Study Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review Author: Sarah Large MA(Cantab) MSc Dip (IoA) MIOA Reviewed by Mike Stigwood © 2015 MAS Environmental Ltd & Chris Heaton-Harris. No part of this Study may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise except through the prior written permission of the authors. Limit of liability: While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this Study, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of its contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation Page 1 of 34 24 August 2015 Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Scope 4 3 Introduction and methodology 5 4 Review of AM 2004 - 2006 6 5 Review of AM 2006 - 2008 7 6 Review of AM 2009 - 2012 10 7 Review of AM 2013 - present 21 8 Conclusion 31 Appendix A - Wind Farm sites known to have caused complaints, including AM complaints. 32 Abbreviations AM Amplitude Modulation EAM Excessive (Enhanced) Amplitude Modulation DBJRG IoA Institute of Acoustics IoA GPG Institute of Acoustics Good Practice Guide NAM Normal Amplitude Modulation OAM Other Amplitude Modulation RUK RenewableUK, the wind industry trade association SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Page 2 of 34 24 August 2015 Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review 1 Executive Summary 1.1 This review focuses primarily on audible amplitude modulation (AM).
    [Show full text]
  • APP/D2510/A/11/2161066 Your
    Samantha Grange Our Ref: APP/D2510/A/11/2161066 Eversheds LLP Your Ref: GRANGESA/176094/000001 70 Great Bridgwater Street Manchester 27 March 2015 M1 5ES TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY MARK CAUDWELL LTD: LAND 7KM NORTH-WEST OF SKEGNESS AND 2KM SOUTH-WEST OF ORBY VILLAGE, EAST LINDSEY DC APPLICATION REF:N/084/00642/10 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, S R G Baird BA (Hons) MRTPI, who held a public local inquiry on 11 – 19 February 2014 and 1 – 3 October 2014 and which was closed in writing on 30 October 2014, into your client's appeal against a decision of East Lindsey District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for the installation and operation of a wind energy scheme comprising 9 wind turbines and ancillary infrastructure for a period of 25 years including external transformers, crane hardstanding and lay-down areas, control building and compound, switchgear on-site, access tracks and turning heads and ditch crossings, permanent monitoring met mast, site entrance, electrical cable connection, site signage and associated groundworks, in accordance with application N/084/00642/10, dated 23 March 2010. 2. On 5 June 2013, the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because the appeal relates to proposals of major significance for the delivery of the government’s climate change programme and energy policies.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESENTATION on WIND TURBINE AM by Geoffrey Weller I Am a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology
    PRESENTATION ON WIND TURBINE AM by Geoffrey Weller I am a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology. Much of my career was devoted to developing electronic protection schemes for electrical power systems. This included analysis of noisy electrical signals using digital signal processing, for instance with fast Fourier transforms. I have experience of amplitude modulation of radio-frequency signals. Introduction My evidence shows that ETSU-R-97 is failing to protect windfarm neighbours from Amplitude Modulation, the most distressing characteristic of wind turbine noise. ETSU-R-97 is used throughout the UK to assess wind farm noise in planning applications. As it has been embedded into government policy, it is probably futile to insist that ETSU is wrong. However, I do assert that additional protection for AM is needed for windfarm neighbours where the AM exceeds the maximum level quoted in ETSU. This presentation will summarise some of my Proof of Evidence, mention some events that occurred since I submitted it, and amplify the conclusions I drew previously. What is AM? To demonstrate the character of AM, I would like to play two audio files located at the following web URLs i) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/51620331/Swish_to_Thump.mp3 Source: Dick Bowdler FIOA Noise Consultant http://www.dickbowdler.co.uk/content/publications/ ii) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/51620331/file0895_hi_lo_17dbeq_16b.mp3 Source: Recordings of Nature website. There are actually two separate recordings in this file. Proof of Evidence An important source of evidence is the DTI-commissioned 2006 Hayes McKenzie Partnership report The Measurement of Low Frequency Noise at Three UK Wind Farms which noted that Aerodynamic Modulation was occurring in ways not anticipated by ETSU-R-97 (ETSU).
    [Show full text]