DOCSLIB.ORG

SCHEDULE a Complex Planning Applications SCHEDULE No: 1 SL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SCHEDULE a Complex Planning Applications SCHEDULE No: 1 SL SCHEDULE A Complex Planning Applications SCHEDULE No: 1 SL/2011/0685 PENNINGTON: STANDISH COTE AND MEAN MOOR, MARTON AND HARLOCK HILL, PENNINGTON, ULVERSTON PROPOSAL: INSTALLATION OF FIVE 99.5M HIGH (2.3Mw) WIND TURBINES, INCORPORATING THE REMOVAL OF FIVE EXISTING Website Link: TURBINES ON http://www.southlakeland.gov.uk/fastweb/detail.asp?AltRef=SL/2011/0685 HARLOCK HILL, FORMATION OF E325395 N479542 28/03/2013 ON-SITE ACCESS TRACKS, ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS AND CARRIAGEWAY WIDENING WORKS MR MATT RUSSELL SUMMARY: This application seeks permission for the removal of the five existing 53 metre high turbines and replacement with five turbines, which would have a maximum height of 99.5 metres to blade tip. It straddles the administrative boundaries of Barrow Borough Council and South Lakeland District Council. Planning applications detailing the full scheme have been submitted to both authorities. Two of the turbines would be located in South Lakeland and three would be within Barrow Borough. A site visit was undertaken in October last year and this application was deferred from the October Committee Meeting so that the developer could submit further information in support of the application relating to the visual impact from dwelling houses. The report at that time recommended refusal for three reasons: adverse impact on the landscape, adverse impact on living conditions and adverse visual impact on the footpath users of Mean Moor. In addition to the additional information submitted by the applicant, two planning appeal decisions have been drawn to the officer’s attention, GlaxoSmithKline have written stating that they wish to source electricity from the turbines and an independent assessment of the LVIA and the Galpin audit report thereon has been received. The appeal decisions relate to the objective assessment of the impact of wind turbines on living conditions in dwellings, and this has altered conclusions on one of the previous reasons for refusal. All of this material is addressed in the report. Although the proposal will make a tangible contribution to targets for renewable energy generation, this does not outweigh the adverse visual impacts of the proposal and the significant impacts on users of the adjacent public footpaths, taken together. DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSAL: Site Description There are currently five wind turbines located on Harlock Hill near Pennington within South Lakeland District. They have a height of 53 metres and were granted consent in 1995. The application site is approximately 10km northeast of Barrow-in-Furness and 4km northwest of Ulverston. The larger part of the site is located at Mean Moor (Barrow) and the smaller at Harlock Hill (South Lakeland). The two sections are separated by Poaka Beck and the northern part of Harlock Reservoir. The land rises at either side of the beck, and is steeper and higher on Mean Moor, rising up to a height of 311 metres on Bank House Moor immediately to the northwest. The site is farmland and is used for grazing purposes. It is comprised predominantly of semi-improved grassland, improved grassland, marshy grassland and acid grassland. Other habitats include scattered scrub, species poor hedgerows, springs and flushes. Kirkby Moor Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is adjacent to the site to the northwest. Two bridleways and a series of footpaths pass within and adjacent to the part of the site within Barrow Borough. Proposal The proposed turbines would have three blades with a maximum height to blade tip of 99.5m, a maximum hub height of 64 metres and a capacity of up to 2.3 MW. The two turbines on Harlock Hill, within South Lakeland, would be located reasonably close to the locations of the two most northerly existing turbines, and would be separated by approximately 280 metres. The three on Mean Moor, in Barrow Borough, would follow a line northwest from the most southerly of the proposed turbines on Harlock Hill and would have a similar spacing. Access to the Harlock Hill section of the application site would utilise the entrance for the existing wind farm, off the C5018. A new access would be created to serve the Mean Moor section of the application site. This will be taken off the C5016 Ulverston Road, approximately 250 metres northwest of Harlock Farm. The turbines would have circular foundations with a diameter of approximately 7 metres at the surface and 17 metres below the surface. The hard standings at the base of the turbines would be approximately 50 x 22 metres during construction, to allow for crane and component delivery vehicles, and 30 x 22 metres post construction to allow for maintenance. The scheme also includes the construction of two temporary construction compounds; two on-site switch rooms; partial re-routing of one bridleway and one footpath (both within Barrow Borough); and installation of underground on-site electrical and communication cabling. The submission states that the final precise positioning of the turbines would be the subject of a detailed design process following consent which would involve further investigations. As such, the applicant is seeking a micro-siting allowance of 50 metres for all elements of the scheme. The proposal would provide a total maximum “installed capacity” of up to 11.5 MW, compared to the current wind farm which has an installed capacity of 2.5 MW. Applicant’s Activities and Ownership The on-site construction would take approximately seven months. The turbines would be operational for 25 years after which the development would be decommissioned, with all major equipment and above ground structures being removed from the site with the concrete foundations remaining. Any plans for repowering would be subject to a new planning application. The turbines on Harlock Hill are currently owned and operated by the Baywind Energy Co-operative Ltd. The two proposed turbines on this part of the site would be retained by this co-operative and the three turbines within Barrow Borough would be owned and operated by the applicant, Infinergy. The two sections of the proposal have been submitted as one scheme due to viability, and they must be considered as such. The submission states that the wind farm could meet the electricity needs of around 6,000 households each year and is expected to offset between 11,000 and 26,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5950255 - Erection of 5 Turbines and Switch Room. Approved 2.6.1995. Implemented. 5960033 - Erection of 30m Anemometer Mast for measuring wind speed and direction (Retrospective). Approved 27.2.1996. Implemented. CONSULTATIONS: Pennington Parish Council Object because they believe it is not a suitable development for the area. It is unnecessary because the current Harlock Hill wind farm was due to be refurbished regardless of this development. Wind farms are increasingly being installed locally offshore which are more desirable as they do not affect residents’ lives and the Furness Peninsula is already sufficiently populated by wind farms. The Parish Council is not opposed to wind power as a form of meeting the country’s energy needs. Recently the council did not object to two wind turbines being installed on a farm as they were positioned with due consideration to the surrounding area and did not affect local residents and the applicant was the nearest resident to the development. This is not the case with the Furness Wind Farm as those proposing the development will not be affected by it in any way, unlike Pennington Parish residents. There are issues of noise and flicker with their associated guidelines which are open to interpretation and dispute. Reports of illnesses amongst residents close to wind farms, due to the affect of the wind farms, are increasing and gaining credibility. Previously, a proliferation of electricity pylons were erected close to residential areas until it was eventually proved that they could have an adverse affect on health and well-being. It cannot be guaranteed that the health of residents will not be affected. The Furness Peninsula has long been a jewel of the English countryside with spectacular views over Morecambe Bay and the Lakeland Hills but was unknown to many tourists. Pennington Parish Council has applauded Ulverston Town Council’s initiative in installing the Laurel and Hardy Statue recognising the success of the Eric Morecambe statue. This has noticeably increased tourism to the area which also boasts the South Lakes Wildlife Park. As Pennington Parish is on the periphery of these attractions, residents have also responded by investing in accommodation for the increasing number of tourists. This is bringing both much needed income to the area and creating much needed jobs for the area. The Parish Council believes the erection of wind turbines of this height will dominate the landscape for miles around, would affect the ambiance and affect the tourist footfall. The issue of government policy is also of significance. The erection of wind farms has been encouraged however this may change as has happened with solar panels with the financial incentives being cut. In conclusion, Pennington Parish Council vehemently supports the objections of Pennington Parish residents to the Furness Wind Farm development and would implore the council to reject the application. Askam and Ireleth Parish Council Askam and Ireleth Parish Council cannot support this application for the following reasons: It will impact on nearby homes as a result of shadow flicker. The proposal overlooks the village and there will be loss of privacy during construction and on-going maintenance phases. The Statement gives a Landscape and Visual impact assessment which concludes that the effects are minimal, this is a subjective statement not qualified or agreed. The Furness peninsula is of insufficient size to accommodate structures of this size, and they are too close to the adjacent National Park.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
    2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Infrastructure Service Plan 2018-2022 2019/20 Update
    Version 3.4 Transport and infrastructure Service Plan 2018-2022 2019/20 update May 2019 22/05/2019 Service Plan 2018-2022 (2019 update) Version 3.4 P a g e | 2 Introduction by Nigel Blackler Interim Service Director for Transport and Infrastructure The Transport and Infrastructure Service brings together key elements of the Council and works together with partners to help improve the daily lives of the people who live, work and visit Cornwall. This includes making sure communities are connected by reliable, public transport links, to ensure people can access work, health and leisure opportunities. We make sure the road network keeps moving and responds quickly and appropriately to emergency events which threaten this, such as flooding. We work closely with partners in the Rail industry and Highways England to ensure the national rail and road network is fit for purpose for Cornwall’s communities. We also look for opportunities for innovative and efficient improvements to our transport in Cornwall while maintaining links with the rest of the UK. Our service plays an essential role in delivering Cornwall Council’s business plan objectives of: Healthy Cornwall – Encouraging healthy active lifestyles through the provision of walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure is a key focus of the service. The delivery of improved infrastructure connecting key destinations alongside promotion of the health benefits of active travel look to contribute to local and national health targets, improve air quality and the quality of life for Cornwall’s residents and visitors. Homes for Cornwall – Facilitating sustainable housing growth through the delivery of town based Transport Strategies which are underpinned by the principals of Connecting Cornwall: 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to New Values (Information Received As at End of 2010 - Date of Latest Updates Shown for Each Network.)
    G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to new Values (Information received as at End of 2010 - Date of latest updates shown for each network.) DNO [Western Power Distribution - South West Area] total responses as at 05/01/11 User Data Entry Under Frequency Over Frequency Generator Generator Generator Changes Generator Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Agreed to capacity capacity capacity changes Site name Genset implemented capacity unable Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency Comments changes (Y/N) installed agreed to implemented (Y/N) to change (MW) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (MW) change (MW) (MW) Scottish and Southern Energy, Cantelo Nurseries, Bradon Farm, Isle Abbots, Taunton, Somerset Gas Y Y 9.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 47.00 50.50 Following Settings have been applied: 47.5Hz 20s, 47Hz 0.5s, 52Hz 0.5s Bears Down Wind Farm Ltd, Bears Down Wind Farm, St Mawgan, Newquay, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y N 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 47.00 50.50 Contact made. Awaiting info. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz 0.5s) - British Gas Transco, Severn Road, Avonmouth, Bristol Gas Y Y 5.5 5.5 5.5 0.0 47.00 50.50 complete 23/11/10 Cold Northcott Wind Farm Ltd, Cold Northcott, Launceston, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y Y 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 47.00 50.50 Changes completed. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz Connon Bridge Energy Ltd, Landfill Site, East Taphouse, Liskeard, Cornwall 0.5s).Abdul Sattar confirmed complete by email 19/11/10.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1
    South West Peninsula Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of Route Strategies 2 Strategic themes 2 Stakeholder engagement 3 Transport Focus 3 2. The route 5 Route Strategy overview map 7 3. Current constraints and challenges 9 A safe and serviceable network 9 More free-flowing network 9 Supporting economic growth 9 An improved environment 10 A more accessible and integrated network 10 Diversionary routes 15 Maintaining the strategic road network 16 4. Current investment plans and growth potential 17 Economic context 17 Innovation 17 Investment plans 17 5. Future challenges and opportunities 23 6. Next steps 31 i R Lon ou don to Scotla te nd East London Or bital and M23 to Gatwick str Lon ategies don to Scotland West London to Wales The division of rou tes for the F progra elixstowe to Midlands mme of route strategies on t he Solent to Midlands Strategic Road Network M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter A1 South West Peninsula London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 A69 North Pen Newccaastlstlee upon Tyne nines Carlisle A1 Sunderland Midlands to Wales and Gloucest M6 ershire North and East Midlands A66 A1(M) A595 South Midlands Middlesbrougugh A66 A174 A590 A19 A1 A64 A585 M6 York Irish S Lee ea M55 ds M65 M1 Preston M606 M621 A56 M62 A63 Kingston upon Hull M62 M61 M58 A1 M1 Liver Manchest A628 A180 North Sea pool er M18 M180 Grimsby M57 A616 A1(M) M53 M62 M60 Sheffield A556 M56 M6 A46 A55 A1 Lincoln A500 Stoke-on-Trent A38 M1 Nottingham
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wind Turbines Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy
    Development Plans Draft Wind Turbines Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy Wind Turbines Planning Applications Supporting Documents Paper January 2012 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/wind-turbines Blank page Contents Document Page no. Statement of Matters 3 Consultation Statement 7 Evidence Paper 11 Sustainability Appraisal 31 1 Blank page 2 Statement of Matters 3 Blank page 4 Wind Turbines Statement of Matters Title of Document Milton Keynes Council Draft Supplementary Planning Document and Emerging Policy: Wind Turbines Planning Applications (January 2012) Subject matter and geographical Cover and draft SPD The wind turbines document provides guidance for large scale wind turbine planning applications. It seeks to increase protection of residential amenity, as well as the safety of pedestrians and horse riders. The Emerging Policy within the draft SPD introduces a sliding scale of separation distances between residential properties and wind turbines. It also introduces separation distances between bridleways and wind turbines, and footpaths and wind turbines. Period for representations The consultation runs for an eight week period, running from Thursday 2 February 2012 to 5pm Wednesday 28 March 2012. Any person may make representations on the Council’s proposals for the SPD within this consultation period. How to make representations Online: http://miltonkeynes‐consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal Email: development.plans@milton‐keynes.gov.uk Post: Development Plans Milton Keynes Council Civic Office 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Further details of consultation are available at www.milton‐keynes.gov.uk/wind‐turbines Please note that any representations may be accompanied by a request to be notified, at a specified address, of the adoption of the SPD.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayle Masterplan Consultation Report
    Information Classification: PUBLIC Hayle Masterplan Consultation Report December 2019 Information Classification: PUBLIC Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 Statement of Community Involvement ...................................................................... 2 Sustainability Appraisal .............................................................................................. 3 Public Consultation & Responses received .................................................................... 4 Hayle Masterplan Document ...................................................................................... 4 Statutory consultees – Summary of Responses ......................................................... 7 Specific questions – Summary of Responses ........................................................... 13 Appendix 1: Newspaper Notice .................................................................................... 19 Appendix 2: List of Statutory consultees and other organisations .............................. 21 Appendix 3: Consultation Responses ........................................................................... 23 Statutory Consultees ................................................................................................ 23 All other comments .................................................................................................. 39 Hayle Draft Masterplan Consultation Report December 2019 1 Information
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England
    A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross TR010026 5.2 CONSULTATION REPORT APPENDICES PART 3 Planning Act 2008 Section 37(2)(c) Volume 5 August 2018 Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Development Consent Order 201[x] 5.2 CONSULTATION REPORT APPENDICES PART 3 Regulation Number: Section 37(2)(c) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010026 Reference Application Document Reference 5.2 Author: A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version C01 August 2018 Application Issue Appendix Number Appendix Title Appendix M 1 Public Event Exhibition Boards 2 Public Consultation Event Photos Appendix N 1 Poster Appendix O 1 Media Releases Appendix P 1 Pop Up Information Point Photograph Appendix Q 1 Social Media Report Appendix R 1 Copy of Section 48 Notice 2 Scans of Section 48 Notices in Newspapers Appendix S 1 Perranporth Signs Erected During Public Consultation Appendix T 1 Targeted consultation letter sent to PILs on 29 May 2018 2 Letter notifying Cornwall Council of targeted consultation 3 Letter notifying Parish Councils of targeted consultation 4 Letter notifying Sarah Newton MP of targeted consultation 5 Targeted consultation letter sent to PILs on 13 July 2018 Appendix M1 Public Event Exhibition Boards A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Public consultation exhibition 2018 Welcome A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Improving reliability, safety, local life and regional growth Welcome to the A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross consultation, and thank you for your interest in our plans. Currently, journeys on this section of the A30 are delayed. Congestion brings traffic to a standstill and the Cornish economy is being held back.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J – Responses to Q2
    Appendix J – Responses to Q2 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation Number: 37(3)(c) Author: A30 Carland Cross to Chiverton Cross Project Development Team Document EDG0769_PA_PE01_APP J Reference: PI Reference TBC Document Date Version Note 23 July 2015 0 First Issue Highways England & Cornwall Council A30 Carland Cross to Chiverton Cross Public Engagement Report Document Reference: EDG0769_PA_PE01_APP J Issue & Revision Record Revision Date Author Purpose of Issue / Nature of Change 0 23/07/15 DP First Issue This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Highways England or Cornwall Council being obtained. Highways England and Cornwall Council accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Highways England and Cornwall Council for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Highways England and Cornwall Council accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. 2 A30 Carland Cross to Chiverton Cross Public Exhibition March 2015 'Other' Comments Analysis The 'Other' comments listed below contain text that could not be attributed to any of the main themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation & Planning Control Study Work
    Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation & Planning Control Study Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review Author: Sarah Large MA(Cantab) MSc Dip (IoA) MIOA Reviewed by Mike Stigwood © 2015 MAS Environmental Ltd & Chris Heaton-Harris. No part of this Study may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise except through the prior written permission of the authors. Limit of liability: While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this Study, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of its contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation Page 1 of 34 24 August 2015 Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Scope 4 3 Introduction and methodology 5 4 Review of AM 2004 - 2006 6 5 Review of AM 2006 - 2008 7 6 Review of AM 2009 - 2012 10 7 Review of AM 2013 - present 21 8 Conclusion 31 Appendix A - Wind Farm sites known to have caused complaints, including AM complaints. 32 Abbreviations AM Amplitude Modulation EAM Excessive (Enhanced) Amplitude Modulation DBJRG IoA Institute of Acoustics IoA GPG Institute of Acoustics Good Practice Guide NAM Normal Amplitude Modulation OAM Other Amplitude Modulation RUK RenewableUK, the wind industry trade association SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Page 2 of 34 24 August 2015 Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review 1 Executive Summary 1.1 This review focuses primarily on audible amplitude modulation (AM).
    [Show full text]
  • APP/D2510/A/11/2161066 Your
    Samantha Grange Our Ref: APP/D2510/A/11/2161066 Eversheds LLP Your Ref: GRANGESA/176094/000001 70 Great Bridgwater Street Manchester 27 March 2015 M1 5ES TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY MARK CAUDWELL LTD: LAND 7KM NORTH-WEST OF SKEGNESS AND 2KM SOUTH-WEST OF ORBY VILLAGE, EAST LINDSEY DC APPLICATION REF:N/084/00642/10 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, S R G Baird BA (Hons) MRTPI, who held a public local inquiry on 11 – 19 February 2014 and 1 – 3 October 2014 and which was closed in writing on 30 October 2014, into your client's appeal against a decision of East Lindsey District Council (the Council) to refuse planning permission for the installation and operation of a wind energy scheme comprising 9 wind turbines and ancillary infrastructure for a period of 25 years including external transformers, crane hardstanding and lay-down areas, control building and compound, switchgear on-site, access tracks and turning heads and ditch crossings, permanent monitoring met mast, site entrance, electrical cable connection, site signage and associated groundworks, in accordance with application N/084/00642/10, dated 23 March 2010. 2. On 5 June 2013, the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because the appeal relates to proposals of major significance for the delivery of the government’s climate change programme and energy policies.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESENTATION on WIND TURBINE AM by Geoffrey Weller I Am a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology
    PRESENTATION ON WIND TURBINE AM by Geoffrey Weller I am a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology. Much of my career was devoted to developing electronic protection schemes for electrical power systems. This included analysis of noisy electrical signals using digital signal processing, for instance with fast Fourier transforms. I have experience of amplitude modulation of radio-frequency signals. Introduction My evidence shows that ETSU-R-97 is failing to protect windfarm neighbours from Amplitude Modulation, the most distressing characteristic of wind turbine noise. ETSU-R-97 is used throughout the UK to assess wind farm noise in planning applications. As it has been embedded into government policy, it is probably futile to insist that ETSU is wrong. However, I do assert that additional protection for AM is needed for windfarm neighbours where the AM exceeds the maximum level quoted in ETSU. This presentation will summarise some of my Proof of Evidence, mention some events that occurred since I submitted it, and amplify the conclusions I drew previously. What is AM? To demonstrate the character of AM, I would like to play two audio files located at the following web URLs i) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/51620331/Swish_to_Thump.mp3 Source: Dick Bowdler FIOA Noise Consultant http://www.dickbowdler.co.uk/content/publications/ ii) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/51620331/file0895_hi_lo_17dbeq_16b.mp3 Source: Recordings of Nature website. There are actually two separate recordings in this file. Proof of Evidence An important source of evidence is the DTI-commissioned 2006 Hayes McKenzie Partnership report The Measurement of Low Frequency Noise at Three UK Wind Farms which noted that Aerodynamic Modulation was occurring in ways not anticipated by ETSU-R-97 (ETSU).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Summary 2013 >> Sustainability Summary 2013
    Sustainability Summary 2013 >> Sustainability Summary 2013 www.scottishpower.com Welcome About ScottishPower Welcome to ScottishPower’s Sustainability Summary 2013. We ended the year in a strong ScottishPower is part of the Iberdrola Group, the world facility at Hatfield Moor, joint ventures and subsidiaries. position, underlined by our parent company Iberdrola’s continued commitment to the UK leader in wind energy and one of the leading electricity These include SMW Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of energy market. Annual investment in 2013 was £1.2 billion. This has more than doubled since companies in the world. Our vision is that “We aspire ScottishPower Generation that operates a sludge drying the integration of ScottishPower into Iberdrola in 2007. to be the preferred Global Energy Company because of facility near Glasgow and ScotAsh Ltd, a 50:50 joint venture our commitment to the creation of value, quality of life, with Lafarge Tarmac, which processes power station ash ScottishPower is an important participant in the UK economy through job creation, the safety of people and of supply, the protection of the into products for the construction industry. infrastructure investment, tax contribution, supply chain, employment numbers and skills environment and customer focus”. development. As part of the Group’s total investment plan for 2014-16, 41% will be directed to Networks the UK, presenting us with a number of exciting opportunities. This £3 billion investment will During 2013 our main businesses were: SP Energy Networks (SPEN) is responsible for the enable us to continue to modernise and prepare our business for the future as we support the transmission and distribution of electricity to properties transition to a low carbon economy.
    [Show full text]