Carnival and Puritanism in Falstaff

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carnival and Puritanism in Falstaff CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Padua@thesis Università degli Studi di Padova Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Lingue e Letterature Europee e Americane Classe LM-37 Tesi di Laurea Carnival and Puritanism in Falstaff Relatore Laureando Prof. Rocco Coronato Elena Andreutti n° matr.1061433 / LMLLA Anno Accademico 2015 / 2016 ii Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... p. 1 1. Introduction: Henry IV, Falstaff, Martin Marprelate Tracts ........ p. 6 Introduction ........................................................................................................... p. 6 1.1 Introduction to the play ................................................................................... p. 6 1.2 Shakespeare’s History Plays ........................................................................... p. 8 1.3 Shakespeare’s Politics .................................................................................... p. 11 1.4 “Plump” Jack Falstaff ..................................................................................... p. 13 1.5 Oldcastle – Falstaff Controversy .................................................................... p. 16 1.6 The Marprelate Controversy ........................................................................... p. 19 2. The Carnivalesque and the grotesque body ......................................... p. 23 Introduction ........................................................................................................... p. 23 2.1 The Carnivalesque ........................................................................................... p. 24 2.2 Festivity and popular tradition in Elizabethan Age ......................................... p. 25 2.3 Shakespeare’s festivity and Saturnalian pattern .............................................. p. 28 2.4 Bakhtin’s Carnivalesque .................................................................................. p. 33 2.5 Laughter and comedy ...................................................................................... p. 36 2.6 Laughter and the body ..................................................................................... p. 38 2.7 Grotesque realism and grotesque body ............................................................ p. 40 3. Puritanism and theatre in Elizabethan Age ......................................... p. 50 Introduction ........................................................................................................... p. 50 3.1 Introduction to Puritanism ............................................................................... p. 50 3.2 Puritans and laughter ....................................................................................... p. 58 3.3 Puritans and theatre ......................................................................................... p. 61 4. Carnival and Puritanism in Falstaff ....................................................... p. 67 Introduction ........................................................................................................... p. 67 4.1 Falstaff in 1 & 2 Henry IV ............................................................................... p. 68 4.2 History and Carnival ........................................................................................ p. 71 iii 4.3 The World Upside Down ................................................................................ p. 78 4.4 Kings and clowns: the dramatic roles in 1 & 2 Henry IV ............................... p. 82 4.5 Falstaff and his grotesque body: large as the drama itself .............................. p. 87 4.6 Falstaff’s Puritan wit ....................................................................................... p. 94 4.7 Falstaff and The Merry Wives of Windsor ...................................................... p.102 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. p.111 Bibliography ......................................................................................................... p.117 Riassunto ................................................................................................................ p.122 iv v Introduction “Counterfeit? I lie, I am no counterfeit. To die is to be a counterfeit, for he is but the counterfeit if a man who hath not the life of a man; but to counterfeit dying, when a man thereby liveth, is to be no counterfeit, but the true and perfect image of life indeed. The better part of valour is discretion, in the which better part I have saved my life”. (1 Henry IV, V, iv, 113-9) This study is focused on the analysis of the character of Falstaff in Shakespeare’s history plays 1 & 2 Henry IV; in addition I will study Falstaff’s role in The Merry Wives of Windsor. This topic aroused my interest when I attended a series of lectures on Shakespeare’s history plays at the University of Glasgow. Falstaff is a central character in Shakespeare and one of the most successful comic creations of the history of theatre. Harold Bloom claims that “only a few characters in the world’s literature can match the real presence of Falstaff, who in that regard is Hamlet’s greater rival in Shakespeare”1. The element shared by Hamlet and Falstaff is undoubtedly the superb wit; their common feature is the complexity of their consciousness and their incomparable dramatic presence. Falstaff, “the rouge”, the “trunk of humours”, “that huge bombard of sack”, “that reverend Vice”, rules the comic sub-plot in the history play. The main historical plot of Henry IV is the decadence of the illegitimate kingship of Henry IV under the threat of rebellious forces. Falstaff’s depraved lifestyle is in opposition to the court values, especially to the concept of honour, strongly present in 1 Henry IV in the valiant character of Hotspur. Falstaff’s values, on the other hand, are licence, “sack and sugar”, sex, deception, and his major vocation: “purse-taking”. His immorality is undeniable and shameless; however, his ability with language and his comic splendour exceed the moral concerns, and it is not by chance that he is one of the most loved Shakespearean characters. Falstaff’s devotion to a wide range of low pleasures, and his deformed physicality led some critics to associate him with the bakhtinian concepts of the carnivalesque and of the grotesque body. Mikhail Bakhtin based his theory of the 1 Harold Bloom, Shakespeare, The Invention Of The Human, New York, Riverhead Books, 1998, p. 279. 1 carnivalesque on the study of the popular forms in Rabelais’ work. He described the carnivalesque as the spirit of temporary licence, the popular inversion of the established hierarchy and order. The grotesque is strongly connected with the carnivalesque; it is focused on the bodily functions and represents the spirit of perpetual metamorphosis and generation. Falstaff’s body is grotesque, because he is fat, “a huge hill of flesh”, old, and indulges in body pleasures. Yet, Falstaff is not only a carnivalesque figure: his complexity introduces many possibilities for the analysis of the character. In addition to the carnivalesque features, criticism has underlined the theme of Puritanism as a possible perspective for reading the Henriad plays. Several studies consider Falstaff’s association with the figure of the “grotesque Puritan”: a stereotyped characterisation of the Puritans emerged in the late sixteenth-century, from a new satirical style in pamphlets and drama. My main interest is to provide a coherent analysis of the most relevant characteristics of Falstaff. The difficulty lies in putting together the several sides of his “gigantic” presence on stage: Shakespeare seems to have merged in Falstaff several traditional “types”. The rouge is linked with the Vice of the morality plays, with the Lord of Misrule, with the stage fool, with the grotesque Puritan, and with the miles gloriosus. The most important point, in my opinion, is how to understand Falstaff’s purpose on stage and in the plays: Shakespeare’s aim was the parody of Puritans or, perhaps, the parody of kingdom and social rules? Or did he simply follow the legend on Prince Henry’s dissolute youth with the subversive Sir John Oldcastle, the historical “father” of Falstaff? In the first chapter I will provide a general introduction to Shakespeare’s second tetralogy of history plays, which include Richard II, the two parts of Henry IV and Henry V. A part is centred on the political aspects of Henry IV and on the historical sources upon which Shakespeare’s based the plays. The theme of politics is important, because Falstaff, in his role of Lord of Misrule, opposes established order and kingship. With respect to the theme of politics, I have taken in consideration mainly the works of Holderness, Tillyard and Spiekerman, who examine in depth Shakespeare’s historical plays. After the general introduction on the plays, I will present the character of Falstaff, showing his remarkable “career” in vices, and his relationship with the Prince Hal. Merry Jack, though, in the early representations of the play was not called Falstaff, but John Oldcastle an historical figure lived during Henry V’s reign and executed for 2 heresy. I will devote a section of the chapter to this figure, clarifying why Falstaff was recognisable as Oldcastle by the Elizabethan audience. In conclusion, I will illustrate the Marprelate Controversy,
Recommended publications
  • A Yorkshire Tragedy by William Shakespeare (Apocrypha)
    A Yorkshire Tragedy by William Shakespeare (Apocrypha) This etext was produced by Tony Adam. Shakespeare, William. A Yorkshire Tragedy. Not So New as Lamentable and True. In C.F. Tucker Brooke, ed., The Shakespeare Apocrypha (Oxford, 1918). ALL'S ONE, OR, ONE OF THE FOUR PLAYS IN ONE, CALLED A YORK-SHIRE TRAGEDY AS IT WAS PLAYED BY THE KING'S MAJESTY'S PLAYERS. Dramatis Personae. Husband. Master of a College. Knight, a Justice of Peace. Oliver, Ralph, Samuel, serving-men. Other Servants, and Officers. page 1 / 56 Wife. Maid-servant. A little Boy. SCENE I. A room in Calverly Hall. [Enter Oliver and Ralph, two servingmen.] OLIVER. Sirrah Ralph, my young Mistress is in such a pitiful passionate humor for the long absence of her love-- RALPH. Why, can you blame her? why, apples hanging longer on the tree then when they are ripe makes so many fallings; viz., Mad wenches, because they are not gathered in time, are fain to drop of them selves, and then tis Common you know for every man to take em up. OLIVER. Mass, thou sayest true, Tis common indeed: but, sirrah, is neither our young master returned, nor our fellow Sam come from London? RALPH. page 2 / 56 Neither of either, as the Puritan bawd says. Slidd, I hear Sam: Sam's come, her's! Tarry! come, yfaith, now my nose itches for news. OLIVER. And so does mine elbow. [Sam calls within. Where are you there?] SAM. Boy, look you walk my horse with discretion; I have rid him simply. I warrant his skin sticks to his back with very heat: if a should catch cold and get the Cough of the Lungs I were well served, were I not? [Enter Sam.
    [Show full text]
  • PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 and 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate
    PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 AND 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Committee: Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Dr. John Makay Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Ron E. Shields Dr. Don McQuarie © 2007 Bradley C. Klypchak All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Between 1984 and 1991, heavy metal became one of the most publicly popular and commercially successful rock music subgenres. The focus of this dissertation is to explore the following research questions: How did the subculture of heavy metal music between 1984 and 1991 evolve and what meanings can be derived from this ongoing process? How did the contextual circumstances surrounding heavy metal music during this period impact the performative choices exhibited by artists, and from a position of retrospection, what lasting significance does this particular era of heavy metal merit today? A textual analysis of metal- related materials fostered the development of themes relating to the selective choices made and performances enacted by metal artists. These themes were then considered in terms of gender, sexuality, race, and age constructions as well as the ongoing negotiations of the metal artist within multiple performative realms. Occurring at the juncture of art and commerce, heavy metal music is a purposeful construction. Metal musicians made performative choices for serving particular aims, be it fame, wealth, or art. These same individuals worked within a greater system of influence. Metal bands were the contracted employees of record labels whose own corporate aims needed to be recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Elgar Chadwick
    ELGAR Falstaff CHADWICK Tam O’Shanter Andrew Constantine BBC National Orchestra of Wales Timothy West Samuel West CD 1 CD 2 Sir Edward Elgar (1857-1934) Sir Edward Elgar (1857-1934) Falstaff – Symphonic Study in C minor, Op.68 Falstaff – Symphonic Study in C minor, Op.68 1 I am not only witty in myself, but the cause that wit is in other men 3.59 1 Falstaff and Prince Henry 3.05 2 Falstaff and Prince Henry 3.02 2 Eastcheap - the robbery at Gadshill - The Boar’s Head - revelry and sleep 13.25 3 What’s the matter? 3.28 3 Dream interlude: ‘Jack Falstaff, now Sir John, a boy, 4 Eastcheap - the robbery at Gadshill - The Boar’s Head - and page to Sir Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk 2.35 revelry and sleep 13.25 4 Falstaff’s March - The return through Gloucestershire 4.12 5 Dream interlude: ‘Jack Falstaff, now Sir John, a boy, and page to Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk’ 2.37 5 Interlude: Gloucestershire. Shallow’s orchard - The new king - The hurried ride to London 2.45 6 Come, sir, which men shall I have? 1.43 6 King Henry V’s progress - The repudiation of Falstaff and his death 9.22 7 Falstaff’s March - The return through Gloucestershire 4.12 8 Interlude: Shallow’s orchard - The new king - Total time 35.28 The hurried ride to London 2.44 BBC National Orchestra of Wales 9 Sir John, thy tender lambkin now is king. Harry the Fifth’s the man 2.24 Andrew Constantine 10 King Henry V’s progress - The repudiation of Falstaff and his death 9.25 George Whitefield Chadwick (1854-1931) Tam O’Shanter 11 Chadwick’s introductory note to Tam O’Shanter 4.32 12 Tam O’Shanter 19.39 Total time 71.14 BBC National Orchestra of Wales Andrew Constantine Falstaff, Timothy West Prince Henry, Samuel West George Whitefield Chadwick, Erik Chapman Robert Burns, Billy Wiz 2 Many of you might be coming to Elgar’s great masterpiece Falstaff for the very first time - I truly hope so! It has, undeniably, had a harder time working its way into the consciousness of the ‘Elgar-lover’ than most of his other great works.
    [Show full text]
  • 87 Hemingway, S. B. (Ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (New Variorum Shake
    87 Texts Hemingway, S. B. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (New Variorum Shake­ speare, Philadelphia and London, 1936). Shaaber, Matthias A. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (New Variorum Shakespeare, Philadelphia and London, 1940). Humphreys, A. R. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (Arden Shakespeare, London, 1960). Humphreys, A. R. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (Arden Shakespeare, London, 1966). Davison, P. H. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (New Penguin Shakespeare, Harmondsworth, 1968). Davison, P. H. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (New Penguin Shakespeare, Harmondsworth, 1977). Mack, Maynard (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (Signet Shakespeare, New York, 1965, 1987). Holland, Norman L. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (Signet Shakespeare, New York, 1965). Bevington, David (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (Oxford Shakespeare, Oxford, 1987). Melchiori, Giorgio (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (Oxford Shakespeare, Oxford, 1989). The New Variorum Shakespeare editions are monumental works of scholarship for reference only. All the remaining editions cater for students' needs with critical introductions, notes, sources and so on. Long established with footnotes that are easily used, the Arden edition has always been very popular. The Signet and Penguin editions have made their mark and are quite economical. The recent Oxford editions have excellent illustrations and are strong on stage history. 88 Bibliographies, Guides and Surveys Bergeron, David M., and De Sousa, Geraldo U., Shakespeare: A Study and Research Guide (Lawrence, Kansas, 1987). Berry, Edward, 'Twentieth-century Shakespeare criticism: the his­ tories' in Stanley Wells (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies (Cambridge, 1986). Burden, Dennis H., 'Shakespeare's History Plays: 1952-1983', Shakespeare Survey 38, 1985, pp. 1-18.
    [Show full text]
  • Pure Magazine
    PURE MAGAZINOctobeEr 2017 Jack O’Rourke Talks Music, Electric Picnic, Father John Misty and more… The Evolution Of A Modern Gentleman Jimmy Star chats with Hollywood actor... Sean Kanan Sony’s VR capabilities establishes them as serious contenders in the Virtual Reality headset war! Eli Lieb Talks Music, Creating & Happiness… Featured Artist Dionne Warwick Marilyn Manson Cheap Trick Otherkin Eileen Shapiro chats with award winning artist Emma Langford about her Debut + much more EalbumM, tour neMws plus mAore - T urLn to pAage 16 >N> GFORD @PureMzine Pure M Magazine ISSUE 22 Mesmerising WWW.PUREMZINE.COM forty seven Editor in Chief Trevor Padraig [email protected] and a half Editorial Paddy Dunne [email protected] minutes... Sarah Swinburne [email protected] Shane O’ Rielly [email protected] Marilyn Manson Heaven Upside Down Contributors Dave Simpson Eileen Shapiro Jimmy Star Garrett Browne lt-rock icon Marilyn Manson is back “Say10” showcases a captivatingly creepy Danielle Holian brandishing a brand new album coalescence of hauntingly hushed verses and Simone Smith entitled Heaven Upside Down. fantastically fierce choruses next as it Irvin Gamede ATackling themes such as sex, romance, saunters unsettlingly towards the violence and politics, the highly-anticipated comparatively cool and catchy “Kill4Me”. Front Cover - Ken Coleman sequel to 2015’s The Pale Emperor features This is succeeded by the seductively ten typically tumultuous tracks for fans to psychedelic “Saturnalia”, the dreamy yet www.artofkencoleman.com feast upon. energetic delivery of which ensures it stays It’s introduced through the sinister static entrancing until “Je$u$ Cri$i$” arrives to of “Revelation #12” before a brilliantly rivet with its raucous refrain and rebellious bracing riff begins to blare out beneath a instrumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • King and Country: Shakespeare’S Great Cycle of Kings Richard II • Henry IV Part I Henry IV Part II • Henry V Royal Shakespeare Company
    2016 BAM Winter/Spring #KingandCountry Brooklyn Academy of Music Alan H. Fishman, Chairman of the Board William I. Campbell, Vice Chairman of the Board BAM, the Royal Shakespeare Company, and Adam E. Max, Vice Chairman of the Board The Ohio State University present Katy Clark, President Joseph V. Melillo, Executive Producer King and Country: Shakespeare’s Great Cycle of Kings Richard II • Henry IV Part I Henry IV Part II • Henry V Royal Shakespeare Company BAM Harvey Theater Mar 24—May 1 Season Sponsor: Directed by Gregory Doran Set design by Stephen Brimson Lewis Global Tour Premier Partner Lighting design by Tim Mitchell Music by Paul Englishby Leadership support for King and Country Sound design by Martin Slavin provided by the Jerome L. Greene Foundation. Movement by Michael Ashcroft Fights by Terry King Major support for Henry V provided by Mark Pigott KBE. Major support provided by Alan Jones & Ashley Garrett; Frederick Iseman; Katheryn C. Patterson & Thomas L. Kempner Jr.; and Jewish Communal Fund. Additional support provided by Mercedes T. Bass; and Robert & Teresa Lindsay. #KingandCountry Royal Shakespeare Company King and Country: Shakespeare’s Great Cycle of Kings BAM Harvey Theater RICHARD II—Mar 24, Apr 1, 5, 8, 12, 14, 19, 26 & 29 at 7:30pm; Apr 17 at 3pm HENRY IV PART I—Mar 26, Apr 6, 15 & 20 at 7:30pm; Apr 2, 9, 23, 27 & 30 at 2pm HENRY IV PART II—Mar 28, Apr 2, 7, 9, 21, 23, 27 & 30 at 7:30pm; Apr 16 at 2pm HENRY V—Mar 31, Apr 13, 16, 22 & 28 at 7:30pm; Apr 3, 10, 24 & May 1 at 3pm ADDITIONAL CREATIVE TEAM Company Voice
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Puritans in William Shakespeare's Twelfth Night
    AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume2, Number 1, February 2018 Pp. 97-105 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol2no1.7 The Representation of Puritans in William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night Rachid MEHDI Department of English, Faculty of Art Abderahmane-Mira University of Bejaia, Algeria Abstract This article is a study on the representation of Puritans in William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night; or, What You Will, one of his most popular comic play in the modern theatre. In mocking Malvolio’s morality and ridiculous behaviour, Shakespeare wanted to denounce Puritans’ sober society in early modern England. Indeed, Puritans were depicted in the play as being selfish, idiot, hypocrite, and killjoy. In the same way, many other writers of different generations, obviously influenced by Shakespeare, have espoused his views and consequently contributed to promote this anti-Puritan literature, which is still felt today. This article discusses whether Shakespeare’s portrayal of Puritans was accurate or not. To do so, the writer first attempts to define the term “Puritan,” as the latter is quite equivocal, then take some Puritans’ characteristics, namely hypocrisy and killjoy, as provided in the play, and analyze them in the light of the studies of some historians and scholars, experts on the post Reformation Puritanism, to demonstrate that Shakespeare’s view on Puritanism is completely caricatural. Keywords: caricature, early modern theatre, Malvolio, Puritans, satire Cite as: MEHDI, R. (2018). The Representation of Puritans in William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 2 (1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol2no1.7 Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 97 eISSN: 2550-1542 |www.awej-tls.org AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies Volume, 2 Number 1, February 2018 The Representation of Puritans in William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night MEHDI Introduction Puritans had been the target of many English writers during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Part of Sir John Oldcastle
    (the un iversity or a bic ag o FOUNDID BY J OH N D. ROCKEFELLEB T H E FIRS T PA RT OF SIR JOH N OLDCA STLE A H IS TORICAL DRAM A BY MICH ON , TH Y M H THW Y AND AN ON A A , ROBERT WILSON E E DIT D WITH AN IN TROD UCTION , CRITICAL TEXT . AND NOTES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND LITERATURE OF THE UNIVERS ITY OF CHICAGO IN CAN DIDACY FO R T H E D E G RE E O F DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (DEPARTM EN T OF ENGLIS H ) JOHN ROBERTSON M ACARTHUR J J J J J CHICAGO S C T T F RES M AND C M P Y O , O AN O AN 1 907 E L! CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGM ENTS HIS TORY OF T H E TEXT AND ITS EDIT IONS ’ Recor ds in Henslowe . Records in the Stationers Re r . E i s : B . R giste d tion A , , C , D , etc elations of ° A B . r E i . r , , C , D Othe d tions The Second Pa t of Sir John Oldcastle . SOURCES AND GROWT H OF T H E PLAY ' The Rea l Sir John Oldcastle . Immediate Sources — h Holinshed . Causes w ich led to the Wr iting of Sir John Oldcastle : Oldcastle and Falsta ff ; Influence of r r r s Foxe ; G owth of the Oldcastle Sto y in two fo m , Catholic and Protestant ; Wr iting of Sir John Old ’ cas tle ; Wee ver s Poem ; Influence of Henry IV and V ’ — on Oldcastle ; Influence of Peele s Edward I Rela ’ tions in detail ; Relation to Gr eene s Pin ner of Wake R rr E field ; elation to the Me y Devil of dmonton .
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's
    Shakespeare’s Henry IV: s m a r t The Shadow of Succession SHARING MASTERWORKS OF ART April 2007 These study materials are produced for use with the AN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH OF BOB JONES UNIVERSITY Classic Players production of Henry IV: The Shadow of Succession. The historical period The Shadow of Succession takes into account is 1402 to 1413. The plot focuses on the Prince of Wales’ preparation An Introduction to to assume the solemn responsibilities of kingship even while Henry IV regards his unruly son’s prospects for succession as disastrous. The Shadow of When the action of the play begins, the prince, also known as Hal, finds himself straddling two worlds: the cold, aristocratic world of his Succession father’s court, which he prefers to avoid, and the disreputable world of Falstaff, which offers him amusement and camaraderie. Like the plays from which it was adapted, The Shadow of Succession offers audiences a rich theatrical experience based on Shakespeare’s While Henry IV regards Falstaff with his circle of common laborers broad vision of characters, events and language. The play incorporates a and petty criminals as worthless, Hal observes as much human failure masterful blend of history and comedy, of heroism and horseplay, of the in the palace, where politics reign supreme, as in the Boar’s Head serious and the farcical. Tavern. Introduction, from page 1 Like Hotspur, Falstaff lacks the self-control necessary to be a produc- tive member of society. After surviving at Shrewsbury, he continues to Grieved over his son’s absence from court at a time of political turmoil, squander his time in childish pleasures.
    [Show full text]
  • Pynchon's Sound of Music
    Pynchon’s Sound of Music Christian Hänggi Pynchon’s Sound of Music DIAPHANES PUBLISHED WITH SUPPORT BY THE SWISS NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 1ST EDITION ISBN 978-3-0358-0233-7 10.4472/9783035802337 DIESES WERK IST LIZENZIERT UNTER EINER CREATIVE COMMONS NAMENSNENNUNG 3.0 SCHWEIZ LIZENZ. LAYOUT AND PREPRESS: 2EDIT, ZURICH WWW.DIAPHANES.NET Contents Preface 7 Introduction 9 1 The Job of Sorting It All Out 17 A Brief Biography in Music 17 An Inventory of Pynchon’s Musical Techniques and Strategies 26 Pynchon on Record, Vol. 4 51 2 Lessons in Organology 53 The Harmonica 56 The Kazoo 79 The Saxophone 93 3 The Sounds of Societies to Come 121 The Age of Representation 127 The Age of Repetition 149 The Age of Composition 165 4 Analyzing the Pynchon Playlist 183 Conclusion 227 Appendix 231 Index of Musical Instruments 233 The Pynchon Playlist 239 Bibliography 289 Index of Musicians 309 Acknowledgments 315 Preface When I first read Gravity’s Rainbow, back in the days before I started to study literature more systematically, I noticed the nov- el’s many references to saxophones. Having played the instru- ment for, then, almost two decades, I thought that a novelist would not, could not, feature specialty instruments such as the C-melody sax if he did not play the horn himself. Once the saxophone had caught my attention, I noticed all sorts of uncommon references that seemed to confirm my hunch that Thomas Pynchon himself played the instrument: McClintic Sphere’s 4½ reed, the contra- bass sax of Against the Day, Gravity’s Rainbow’s Charlie Parker passage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elgar Sketch-Books
    THE ELGAR SKETCH-BOOKS PAMELA WILLETTS A MAJOR gift from Mrs H. S. Wohlfeld of sketch-books and other manuscripts of Sir Edward Elgar was received by the British Library in 1984. The sketch-books consist of five early books dating from 1878 to 1882, a small book from the late 1880s, a series of eight volumes made to Elgar's instructions in 1901, and two later books commenced in Italy in 1909.^ The collection is now numbered Add. MSS. 63146-63166 (see Appendix). The five early sketch-books are oblong books in brown paper covers. They were apparently home-made from double sheets of music-paper, probably obtained from the stock of the Elgar shop at 10 High Street, Worcester. The paper was sewn together by whatever means was at hand; volume III is held together by a gut violin string. The covers were made by the expedient of sticking brown paper of varying shades and textures to the first and last leaves of music-paper and over the spine. Book V is of slightly smaller oblong format and the sides of the music sheets in this volume have been inexpertly trimmed. The volumes bear Elgar's numbering T to 'V on the covers, his signature, and a date, perhaps that ofthe first entry in the volumes. The respective dates are: 21 May 1878(1), 13 August 1878 (II), I October 1878 (III), 7 April 1879 (IV), and i September 1881 (V). Elgar was not quite twenty-one when the first of these books was dated. Earlier music manuscripts from his hand have survived but the particular interest of these early sketch- books is in their intimate connection with the round of Elgar's musical activities, amateur and professional, at a formative stage in his career.
    [Show full text]
  • View List (.Pdf)
    Symphony Society of New York Stadium Concert United States Premieres New York Philharmonic Commission as of November 30, 2020 NY PHIL Biennial Members of / musicians from the New York Philharmonic Click to jump to decade 1842-49 | 1850-59 | 1860-69 | 1870-79 | 1880-89 | 1890-99 | 1900-09 | 1910-19 | 1920-29 | 1930-39 1940-49 | 1950-59 | 1960-69 | 1970-79 | 1980-89 | 1990-99 | 2000-09 | 2010-19 | 2020 Composer Work Date Conductor 1842 – 1849 Beethoven Symphony No. 3, Sinfonia Eroica 18-Feb 1843 Hill Beethoven Symphony No. 7 18-Nov 1843 Hill Vieuxtemps Fantasia pour le Violon sur la quatrième corde 18-May 1844 Alpers Lindpaintner War Jubilee Overture 16-Nov 1844 Loder Mendelssohn The Hebrides Overture (Fingal's Cave) 16-Nov 1844 Loder Beethoven Symphony No. 8 16-Nov 1844 Loder Bennett Die Najaden (The Naiades) 1-Mar 1845 Wiegers Mendelssohn Symphony No. 3, Scottish 22-Nov 1845 Loder Mendelssohn Piano Concerto No. 1 17-Jan 1846 Hill Kalliwoda Symphony No. 1 7-Mar 1846 Boucher Furstenau Flute Concerto No. 5 7-Mar 1846 Boucher Donizetti "Tutto or Morte" from Faliero 20-May 1846 Hill Beethoven Symphony No. 9, Choral 20-May 1846 Loder Gade Grand Symphony 2-Dec 1848 Loder Mendelssohn Violin Concerto in E minor 24-Nov 1849 Eisfeld Beethoven Symphony No. 4 24-Nov 1849 Eisfeld 1850 – 1859 Schubert Symphony in C major, Great 11-Jan 1851 Eisfeld R. Schumann Introduction and Allegro appassionato for Piano and 25-Apr 1857 Eisfeld Orchestra Litolff Chant des belges 25-Apr 1857 Eisfeld R. Schumann Overture to the Incidental Music to Byron's Dramatic 21-Nov 1857 Eisfeld Poem, Manfred 1860 - 1869 Brahms Serenade No.
    [Show full text]