DOCSLIB.ORG

The First Part of Sir John Oldcastle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The First Part of Sir John Oldcastle (the un iversity or a bic ag o FOUNDID BY J OH N D. ROCKEFELLEB T H E FIRS T PA RT OF SIR JOH N OLDCA STLE A H IS TORICAL DRAM A BY MICH ON , TH Y M H THW Y AND AN ON A A , ROBERT WILSON E E DIT D WITH AN IN TROD UCTION , CRITICAL TEXT . AND NOTES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND LITERATURE OF THE UNIVERS ITY OF CHICAGO IN CAN DIDACY FO R T H E D E G RE E O F DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (DEPARTM EN T OF ENGLIS H ) JOHN ROBERTSON M ACARTHUR J J J J J CHICAGO S C T T F RES M AND C M P Y O , O AN O AN 1 907 E L! CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGM ENTS HIS TORY OF T H E TEXT AND ITS EDIT IONS ’ Recor ds in Henslowe . Records in the Stationers Re r . E i s : B . R giste d tion A , , C , D , etc elations of ° A B . r E i . r , , C , D Othe d tions The Second Pa t of Sir John Oldcastle . SOURCES AND GROWT H OF T H E PLAY ' The Rea l Sir John Oldcastle . Immediate Sources — h Holinshed . Causes w ich led to the Wr iting of Sir John Oldcastle : Oldcastle and Falsta ff ; Influence of r r r s Foxe ; G owth of the Oldcastle Sto y in two fo m , Catholic and Protestant ; Wr iting of Sir John Old ’ cas tle ; Wee ver s Poem ; Influence of Henry IV and V ’ — on Oldcastle ; Influence of Peele s Edward I Rela ’ tions in detail ; Relation to Gr eene s Pin ner of Wake R rr E field ; elation to the Me y Devil of dmonton . DRAM AT IC TECHNIQ UE AUT HORS HIP o r T H E PLAY r . i . D ayton Hathway Munday . W lson List of r Plays w itten by these Men . Speculation as to the — ’ Parts taken by the four Authors in the Play Flea y s ew—N Vi ega tive Results . E T o r IT ARIANT S ROM B AND . T X A , W H V F , C , D NOT ES BIBLIOGRA PHY r . Histo ical Genera l . T H E FIRS T PART 0 ? am JO HN OLD-CAS T LE Bo th pa rts a re men tione d in the followin g en try fro m th e ’ ti n e rs Re st r r d v n Au ust Sta o gi e unde the ate of the ele e th of g , 1600 Tho ma s pa vier En t re d fo r his co pies vn der t he ha n dee o f ma st e r VICARS a n d th e The fir st pa rte of the histo r y of the life o f Si r JOHN OLDCAS TELL lo r d COBH AM . ’ Ite m the sew n d a nd la et pa rte o f the hteto r y o f JOHN OLDCAS TELL lo r d COBHAM with his mar tyr do m Ite m ye histo r y o f the life a nd Bea the of Ca pta i n with his M o r ia e to ALEXANDE R THOJIAS S T UCLE Y, g U T his da u hte r a nd his va li a n t en di n e o his C R IS g , g f There were two editions of The First Part of Sir Joh n O ld ” a s ri in 1 600 . s fo r s n e n c e c tle p nted The e , the ake of conve i , - we shall designate A and B. A resuma blv r r i , p the fi st , bea s the following t tle The first pa rt o f t he t r ue ho n o l ra ble hist o ry o f th e Life - i a t o f Sir Io hn c a st e t he o o o r Co a m . As t Old l , g d L d bh I h h be n e la t ely act e d by t he Right ho n o ra ble t he Ea r le o f No t n a m o r H Admira ll o f En a n his Se ma n t e . i gh , L d igh gl d , “ W r n W s o n o n r n t e fo r itt e by illia m Sha ke pea re . L d p i d 1 T . P. 600 . ’ We have seen that the re c ords in He n slo we s diary pre ve n t o ur s r r r s e th con ide ing Shakspe e the autho of the play , de pit e - fact that his name appears upon the title pa ge . Thu l e r r s r r ri s in s m a n eco d a re suppo ted by late ent e the a e book , d r ff r l s also by the inte nal evidence a o ded by the p ay it elf . n r r s i d c e Certain emine t Ge man c itic , nclu ing S hl gel a n d ’ n s re b Tieck , have co fidently claimed the play as Shak pe s ; ut the reasons which they advance ca nnot be considered S ufi r - is cient . The appea ance of the name on the title pa ge easy B of explan ation . ecause of the success obta ined by the gre a t r s s r s s rs his a d amati t , un c upulou publi he placed n me upo n in fe rior works of other write rs in orde r thereby to increa se 1 : o Arbor . E. A Transc ript o f th e Registers o f th e Co mpan y o f Sta tio n ers f Lo n - do n 1 664 1 640 L. 1 6 o l 1 . 87 . V . 11 , p 63 8 1 1 57 . ; 1408 e s ; 1633 . ur nee ; 19 12 . 772 , ali ; , Cab , slan p h eete . T he spe lli n g is n o t fixed ; so we ha ve the fo llo wing vu i a n h ] r r so rs so ldie rs sh o Bi o dim “ quarr el , qua el ; uldie , s p , sh p , . - so rr so r wax wa xe ; fe ede e r sexeh min d dia el ; y, y ; , feed , ; s a ch , ; . ra re Lio ne le L o n ell Sufid k Sufio fi mo min de ; g y, g y ; . y ; e ; m . v o n v o n m rt r r r . mony ; pp . p ; u he , mu de v r r n o . in e se , in p ose , and in a combi ation of b th the last class it is sometimes dific ult to te ll just - r r r Five st ess blank ve se is employed, but is ve y We find a large number of rough and other wise R r m s lines hyme occu s about ten ti e , in s of sc e ne . The punctuation is bad . Per iods a re so metim o w me im r entirely . and so t es inse ted in the middle terroga tio u mar ks a re often wanting . " " n wo rd. sheep o ! have bee written tn . 12 T H E FIRS T PART o r S IR JOHN OLD -CAS TLE n s t a ue . 21 66 t c o r l 12 e d wi h h , l ; ca hw d , C ub 1 22 2 13 yo u, . 3 ; ro gue 1 2 K pe a ce , . 360 ; An d o s . 242 K2 L rd hip , l 5 ; n 1 K2 do e , . 2486 is r with h B is It to be noted that the catchwo d , w ich in r a r m r 1 142 ls pla ced ightly fte the line nu be ed in A , is a o r r rr r . found in the latte (A) , whe e it is not the co ect wo d B is r r s ti n The punctuation in ve y bad as a ule , consi g T h l chiefly of commas . e spel ing shows no m a ritie s . ’ r ki n o r kin m rk n k s s is The wo d g a i g the ing speeche , m ca z . 1526 r rin te unifor ly pitali ed to l , whe e it begins to be p d m r n c n f with a s all lette , and so co tinues , with the ex eptio o 57 0 1 572 1 583 e n d r . 11. 1 , , , to the of the pa t m r w B r s s m n r f When co pa ed ith A , p e ent any i te esting ea h s s r . tu res . Some of these we all now con ide B r h n . 1 . The text of is longe t a that of A (0 ) Some thirty-nine o r forty lines altogether have be e n r r f n n s : 1786 1 8 1 6 added , and occu afte the ollowi g li e of A , , 5 19 7 1 1 9 1 3 , 1 9 1 8 , 1 932, 1 945, 1 9 8 , 61 , 1 9 , 1982, 2057 , 2060 , 3 5 7 21 9 1 , 221 1 , 2221 , 22 4 , 224 , 2248 , 2272, 232 , 2360 , 239 1 , 6 450 532 2536 254 7 560 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Henry Iv, Parts One &
    HENRY IV, PARTS ONE & TWO by William Shakespeare Taken together, Shakespeare's major history plays cover the 30-year War of the Roses, a struggle between two great families, descended from King Edward III, for the throne of England. The division begins in “Richard II,” when that king, of the House of York, is deposed by Henry Bolingbroke of the House of Lancaster, who will become Henry IV. The two Henry IV plays take us through this king's reign, ending with the coronation of his ne'er-do-well son, Prince Hal, as Henry V. In subsequent plays, we follow the fortunes of these two families as first one, then the other, assumes the throne, culminating in “Richard III,” which ends with the victory of Henry VII, who ends the War of the Roses by combining both royal lines into the House of Tudor and ruthlessly killing off all claimants to the throne. What gives the Henry IV plays their great appeal is the presence of a fat, rascally knight named Falstaff, with whom Prince Hal spends his youth. Falstaff is one of Shakespeare's most memorable characters and his comedy tends to dominate the action. He was so popular with audiences that Shakespeare had to kill him off in “Henry V,” lest he detract from the heroism of young King Henry V. “Henry IV, Part One,” deals with a rebellion against King Henry by his former allies. The subplot concerns the idle life led by the heir to the throne, Prince Hal, who spends his time with London's riffraff, even going so far as to join them in robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • King and Country: Shakespeare’S Great Cycle of Kings Richard II • Henry IV Part I Henry IV Part II • Henry V Royal Shakespeare Company
    2016 BAM Winter/Spring #KingandCountry Brooklyn Academy of Music Alan H. Fishman, Chairman of the Board William I. Campbell, Vice Chairman of the Board BAM, the Royal Shakespeare Company, and Adam E. Max, Vice Chairman of the Board The Ohio State University present Katy Clark, President Joseph V. Melillo, Executive Producer King and Country: Shakespeare’s Great Cycle of Kings Richard II • Henry IV Part I Henry IV Part II • Henry V Royal Shakespeare Company BAM Harvey Theater Mar 24—May 1 Season Sponsor: Directed by Gregory Doran Set design by Stephen Brimson Lewis Global Tour Premier Partner Lighting design by Tim Mitchell Music by Paul Englishby Leadership support for King and Country Sound design by Martin Slavin provided by the Jerome L. Greene Foundation. Movement by Michael Ashcroft Fights by Terry King Major support for Henry V provided by Mark Pigott KBE. Major support provided by Alan Jones & Ashley Garrett; Frederick Iseman; Katheryn C. Patterson & Thomas L. Kempner Jr.; and Jewish Communal Fund. Additional support provided by Mercedes T. Bass; and Robert & Teresa Lindsay. #KingandCountry Royal Shakespeare Company King and Country: Shakespeare’s Great Cycle of Kings BAM Harvey Theater RICHARD II—Mar 24, Apr 1, 5, 8, 12, 14, 19, 26 & 29 at 7:30pm; Apr 17 at 3pm HENRY IV PART I—Mar 26, Apr 6, 15 & 20 at 7:30pm; Apr 2, 9, 23, 27 & 30 at 2pm HENRY IV PART II—Mar 28, Apr 2, 7, 9, 21, 23, 27 & 30 at 7:30pm; Apr 16 at 2pm HENRY V—Mar 31, Apr 13, 16, 22 & 28 at 7:30pm; Apr 3, 10, 24 & May 1 at 3pm ADDITIONAL CREATIVE TEAM Company Voice
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's
    Shakespeare’s Henry IV: s m a r t The Shadow of Succession SHARING MASTERWORKS OF ART April 2007 These study materials are produced for use with the AN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH OF BOB JONES UNIVERSITY Classic Players production of Henry IV: The Shadow of Succession. The historical period The Shadow of Succession takes into account is 1402 to 1413. The plot focuses on the Prince of Wales’ preparation An Introduction to to assume the solemn responsibilities of kingship even while Henry IV regards his unruly son’s prospects for succession as disastrous. The Shadow of When the action of the play begins, the prince, also known as Hal, finds himself straddling two worlds: the cold, aristocratic world of his Succession father’s court, which he prefers to avoid, and the disreputable world of Falstaff, which offers him amusement and camaraderie. Like the plays from which it was adapted, The Shadow of Succession offers audiences a rich theatrical experience based on Shakespeare’s While Henry IV regards Falstaff with his circle of common laborers broad vision of characters, events and language. The play incorporates a and petty criminals as worthless, Hal observes as much human failure masterful blend of history and comedy, of heroism and horseplay, of the in the palace, where politics reign supreme, as in the Boar’s Head serious and the farcical. Tavern. Introduction, from page 1 Like Hotspur, Falstaff lacks the self-control necessary to be a produc- tive member of society. After surviving at Shrewsbury, he continues to Grieved over his son’s absence from court at a time of political turmoil, squander his time in childish pleasures.
    [Show full text]
  • CHOATE-DOCUMENT-2020.Pdf
    Copyright Evan Choate 2020 ABSTRACT Fictional Texts, Imaginary Performances, and Historiographic Desire in Renaissance England by Evan Choate This dissertation explores how and why we care about history. I argue that our investment in the past is inseparable from the ways we represent it. Historiographic desire both animates and is animated by a continuous performance of historical proliferation that we experience as exhaustion, frustration, boredom, paranoia, and disappointment. Far from blunting history’s appeal, these affects mark the depth of our investment in it. To understand the dynamics of history as vertiginous webs of fictional texts and imaginary performances, I look to the radical innovations in methodology that emerged from the crucible of the English Reformation, which are too often understudied in the context of literary historicism. By attending the reciprocal evolution of drama and historiography over the course of the sixteenth century, I provide a novel account of the productive tensions among history, desire, and subjectivity that persist to this day. The theater was fundamental to the way Protestant historians such as John Foxe encountered the past. For Foxe, the renewable presence of performance and the duality of theatrical representation provided the basic structure for understanding how and why the past mattered. Theater provided a means of reconciling the objectivity that Foxe wanted from history and his awareness of the inherent subjectivity of actually producing history. Foxe’s influential recentering of history as a mode of experiencing the present was iv essential to the emergence of the commercial theater in London, which produced plays with a level of characterological sophistication and depth unlike anywhere else in sixteenth-century Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage
    William Shakespeare on Film, Video and Stage Titles in bold red font with an asterisk (*) represent the crème de la crème – first choice titles in each category. These are the titles you’ll probably want to explore first. Titles in bold black font are the second- tier – outstanding films that are the next level of artistry and craftsmanship. Once you have experienced the top tier, these are where you should go next. They may not represent the highest achievement in each genre, but they are definitely a cut above the rest. Finally, the titles which are in a regular black font constitute the rest of the films within the genre. I would be the first to admit that some of these may actually be worthy of being “ranked” more highly, but it is a ridiculously subjective matter. Bibliography Shakespeare on Silent Film Robert Hamilton Ball, Theatre Arts Books, 1968. (Reissued by Routledge, 2016.) Shakespeare and the Film Roger Manvell, Praeger, 1971. Shakespeare on Film Jack J. Jorgens, Indiana University Press, 1977. Shakespeare on Television: An Anthology of Essays and Reviews J.C. Bulman, H.R. Coursen, eds., UPNE, 1988. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon Susan Willis, The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography Kenneth S. Rothwell, Neil Schuman Pub., 1991. Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen Lorne M. Buchman, Oxford University Press, 1991. Shakespeare Observed: Studies in Performance on Stage and Screen Samuel Crowl, Ohio University Press, 1992. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television Anthony Davies & Stanley Wells, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry IV, Part 2, Continues the Story of Henry IV, Part I
    Folger Shakespeare Library https://shakespeare.folger.edu/ Get even more from the Folger You can get your own copy of this text to keep. Purchase a full copy to get the text, plus explanatory notes, illustrations, and more. Buy a copy Contents From the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library Front Textual Introduction Matter Synopsis Characters in the Play Induction Scene 1 ACT 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 1 Scene 2 ACT 2 Scene 3 Scene 4 Scene 1 ACT 3 Scene 2 Scene 1 ACT 4 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 1 Scene 2 ACT 5 Scene 3 Scene 4 Scene 5 Epilogue From the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library It is hard to imagine a world without Shakespeare. Since their composition four hundred years ago, Shakespeare’s plays and poems have traveled the globe, inviting those who see and read his works to make them their own. Readers of the New Folger Editions are part of this ongoing process of “taking up Shakespeare,” finding our own thoughts and feelings in language that strikes us as old or unusual and, for that very reason, new. We still struggle to keep up with a writer who could think a mile a minute, whose words paint pictures that shift like clouds. These expertly edited texts are presented to the public as a resource for study, artistic adaptation, and enjoyment. By making the classic texts of the New Folger Editions available in electronic form as The Folger Shakespeare (formerly Folger Digital Texts), we place a trusted resource in the hands of anyone who wants them.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir John Oldcastle Downloaded From
    484 July Sir John Oldcastle Downloaded from INCE the early days of the English Reformation Sir John S Oldcastle has held a high place in the traditions of his country. Two of the chief advocates of protestantism, seeking edification in the history of their Lollard predecessors, published accounts of http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ his Bufferings; and his renown, proclaimed by Tyndale's work,1 and doubtless increased by the issue of Bale's Bre/e Chronyclc* grew higher and higher till he came to be regarded as a, national heTo. Early in the reign of Elixabeth, however, Foxe had to defend his eulogy of Oldcastle against the criticism of a Roman catholic historian ; and a generation or so later the Lollard advocates broke a lance with the dramatist*, whose traditions made Oldcastle fl. roystering buffoon. The sympathies of the ascendant at University of Manitoba on August 31, 2015 party were on Foxe's side; his reply succeeded in silencing hiB opponent, and Shakespeare was driven to change the surname of a famous character from Oldcastle to Falstaff.1 Oldcastle'a fame has been kept alive down to modern times by fresh editions of old works and the publication of new ones. He has been associated with Wycliffe, HUB, and Latimer as one of the heroes of the Reformation,4 and with "W»t Tyler and John Ball as a ' popular leader' of the middle ages;' and in the hands of one writer the lAf* and Time$ of Lord Cobham have been made to fill two sub- 1 This nrk, which tu poMbhwl in 1AM, U unfortunately lori.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir John Oldcastle and the Construction of Shakespeare's
    SEL38 (1998) ISSN 0039-3657 SirJohn Oldcastle and the Construction of Shakespeare's Authorship DOUGLAS A. BROOKS Let vs returne vnto the Bench againe, And there examine further of this fray. -SirJohn Oldcastle, I.i.124-5 A decade ago the editors of the Oxford William Shakespeare: The CompleteWorks replaced the name of the character called Falstaff in Henry IVPart Iwith a hypothetically earlier version of the character's name, Sir John Oldcastle. The restoration of Oldcastle to the Oxford edition makes it the first authoritative text to undo an alteration which, as scholars have long suspected, Shakespeare himself must have made sometime between a non-extant 1596 performance text and the 1598 quarto of the play. The resulting scholarly debate over this editorial decision has touched on a number of significant issues linked to the authority and authenticity of "Shakespearean" texts, and it has raised important questions about how these texts were shaped by the material, religious, and political conditions in which they were produced.l In the case of HenryIVPart I, crit- ics have struggled to reconstruct how an early version of the text with Oldcastle as the protagonist of the unworthy knight plot might have placed the play and its author in a complicated Douglas A. Brooks recently completed his Ph.D. at Columbia University, and is assistant professor of Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama at Texas A&M University. He is currently working on a book about early modern dramatic authorship and print. 334 SIR JOHN OLDCASTLE position between an individual's reputation and a nation's.
    [Show full text]
  • King Henry IV: Part 2 Free
    FREE KING HENRY IV: PART 2 PDF William Shakespeare,James C. Bulman | 576 pages | 28 Jul 2016 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781904271376 | English | London, United Kingdom Henry IV, Part 2 | Folger Shakespeare Library Henry IV, Part 2chronicle play in five acts by William Shakespearewritten in —98 and published in a corrupt text based in part on memorial reconstruction in a quarto edition in A better text, printed in the main from an authorial manuscript, appeared in the First Folio of and is generally the more reliable version. The swaggering Falstaff has become even more corpulent and outrageous, sponging King Henry IV: Part 2 his hostess, Mistress Quickly, abusing the Lord Chief Justicepreening for the admiring Doll Tearsheet, and taking advantage of everyone, especially his ensign, Pistoland his old friends Justice Shallow and Justice Silence. News comes that Prince John has settled the war through a perfidious betrayal of promises made to the enemy leaders as a condition of their disbanding their forces. Henry talks, yet again, about a pilgrimage so that he can die in the Holy Land. The wily Henry advises Hal to avoid internal King Henry IV: Part 2 during his own reign by seeking foreign quarrels. Hal prepares to become king, setting aside his previous frivolous image and reassuring his brothers of his loyalty to them and his genuine grief at their mutual loss. Falstaff arrives with his entourage, expecting a lively and King Henry IV: Part 2 welcome from his old friend. Instead, Hal, now King Henry V, denounces Falstaff, orders him and his cronies to repent their profligate ways, and has the Lord Chief Justice take them to the Fleet prison until they have reformed.
    [Show full text]
  • “But Is It Any Good?”: Evaluating Shakespeare Adaptation
    Abstracts, SAA 2020 Seminar. Evaluating Shakespeare Adaptations (Session I) ‘All for your delight, we are not here’: Questioning the preeminent role of the traditional theatre critic Gemma Kate Allred, Université de Neuchâtel Whether through an immersive experience, diversity casting, celebrity casting or updating the text, it is very much of the Zeitgeist for Shakespeare on stage to be adapted for the modern audience. Add into the mix celebrity casting, and questions of authenticity and value are brought to the fore. Within British theatre, we have an established system to assess the worth or merit of a production. Reviewers, often male, upper middle class, and Oxbridge educated, write a few paragraphs for a broadsheet, award a star rating, and the production is rated. However, is this system still fit for purpose? Notions that the audience attracted by these modern productions are simply incapable of understanding is endemic in the critical reviews, with critics placing themselves as an intellectual counterpoint to the uneducated masses. Increasingly, theatre companies make explicit a desire to attract new audiences to Shakespeare. However, in appealing to new audiences, the self-appointed educated elite are implicitly excluded. These established critics frequently don’t get it – but when they are not the intended market for the production, why should they? It’s not for them. In most things we accept when people’s personal preferences differ, and we accept when someone likes something different – coffee or tea we ask – are you a dog person or a cat person? However, with theatre there is a tendency to insist that it is for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of Humanism and Animism in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV, Parts I and II
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 12-20-2009 "Let heaven kiss earth!": The Function of Humanism and Animism in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV, Parts I and II Kathrin Kottemann University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Kottemann, Kathrin, ""Let heaven kiss earth!": The Function of Humanism and Animism in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV, Parts I and II" (2009). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 999. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/999 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Let heaven kiss earth!”: The Function of Humanism and Animism in Shakespeare‟s Richard II and Henry IV, Parts I and II A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English by Kathrin L.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina, Isabella and Shakespeare's Sex Workers
    Marina, Isabella and Shakespeare’s Sex Workers Byron Nelson Marina, Isabella, and Shakespeare’s Sex Workers Byron Nelson Critics have frequently commented on the bad timing of Sir Philip Sidney making his famous complaint about the English plays which are “neither right tragedies, nor right comedies” because of their habit of “mingling kings and clowns” (Sidney 244) just a few years before Shakespeare made such mingling the defining characteristic of his dramatic art. Certainly the contrast between the kings and the clowns is central to Shakespeare’s dramatic strategy, from the incorporation of the humble servant Launce and his dog Crab in Two Gentlemen of Verona at the beginning of his career, to the antics of Stephano and Trinculo in The Tempest at the end. Sidney may never have approved of the sympathetic portrayal of all the levels and classes of society in Shakespeare, but he would have had to give credit to the playwright for his ability to depict a huge range of occupations, from kings to gravediggers. As a godly Puritan, however, Sidney would no doubt have been horrified by Shakespeare’s sympathetic depiction of sex workers, whether in the classical past, as in Pericles, or in contemporary Europe, as in Measure for Measure. Less interested in classical prostitutes or Renaissance courtesans, Shakespeare depicts his sex workers as English and contemporary, regardless of the time period of his plays. Doll Tearsheet, Mistress Overdone and Pompey, and the comic trio of Pander, Bawd and Bolt in Pericles all resemble the sex workers in Shakespeare’s London and indeed could well have been modeled on actual figures from the playwright’s own experience with the Bankside brothels.
    [Show full text]