DOCSLIB.ORG

Rwanda's Biodiversity Expenditure Review Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rwanda's Biodiversity Expenditure Review Report Rwanda The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) Biodiversity Expenditure Review FINAL REPORT Prepared by Christina Van Winkle November 16, 2017 Biodiversity Expenditure Review Acknowledgements This Biodiversity Expenditure Review is the second in a series of reports, policy briefs and other documents being prepared under the auspices of the Rwanda Biodiversity Finance Initiative – BIOFIN - project. This review was made possible by valuable contributions from a number of government and non-government institutions involved in biodiversity protection in Rwanda. Identifying expenditures with biodiversity protection and conservation is a challenging task and required the input and guidance from a number of government agencies. REMA’s support in shaping this report and engaging other institutions was a crucial component to the success of this project. Laetitia Busoke, Alphonsine Ntabana, and Sylvia Kawera offered expert guidance and support in ensuring this report provided a comprehensive review of expenditures and trends over time. MINECOFIN proved instrumental to this project by providing detailed national budget and expenditure data for the years and budget agencies included in this review. A special thanks is warranted to the non-governmental institutions, bilateral donor partners, and private sector institutions for voluntarily providing data on projects and biodiversity-related expenditures in Rwanda, notably ARCOS, DFGFI WCS, MCVP, BIOCOOP, USAID, GIZ and the Akagera Management Company. It is hoped that these findings will enable Rwanda to understand historic trends in biodiversity expenditures, the composition of these expenditures and how biodiversity-related spending is anticipated to change in the future. These results will support Rwanda in developing a financial needs assessment to understand the cost implications of achieving the biodiversity targets identified in Rwanda’s NBSAP. (i) Biodiversity Expenditure Review Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. i List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ v 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Past Expenditures: A literature review ....................................................................... 2 1.4 Organization of tHe Report .............................................................................................. 3 2. Public Institutional Profile .......................................................................................... 4 3. Macroeconomic Profile ................................................................................................. 7 4. MetHodology ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Defining tHe Parameters .................................................................................................. 9 4.2 Classifying Biodiversity-related Expenditures ....................................................... 12 4.3 MetHodology: Government of Rwanda as Implementing Entity ....................... 13 4.4 MetHodology: Non-Government of Rwanda Implementing Entities ............... 16 5. Biodiversity Spending: Government of Rwanda ............................................... 18 5.1 Ministry of Natural Resources (MINIRENA) ............................................................. 18 5.2 Rwanda Environmental Management AutHority (REMA) ................................... 30 5.3 Rwanda Natural Resource AutHority (RNRA) ......................................................... 44 5.3.1 Forest and Nature Conservation (RNRA, RWFA) ........................................................... 47 5.3.2 Integrated Water Resources Management (RNRA, RWFA) ....................................... 52 5.3.3 Land Administration and Land Use Management (RNRA, RLMA) .......................... 55 5.3.4 Mines, Petroleum, and Gas (RNRA, RMPGB) .................................................................... 56 5.3.5 Combined RNRA Department Budgets ............................................................................... 57 5.4 Rwanda Development Board (RDB) ........................................................................... 58 5.5 Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (MINAGRI) ................................ 64 5.6 Rwanda Agriculture Board (RAB) ............................................................................... 74 5.7 OtHer Agencies ................................................................................................................... 80 5.7.1 National Industrial Research and Development Agency (NIRDA) ......................... 80 5.7.2 University of Rwanda ................................................................................................................. 81 5.8 Total Government of Rwanda Expenditure Summary ......................................... 81 6. Future Biodiversity Expenditure Projections for tHe Government of Rwanda 84 7. Biodiversity Spending: Non-Government of Rwanda ...................................... 87 7.1 Bilateral ODA ...................................................................................................................... 87 7.1.1 United Kingdom ............................................................................................................................ 88 7.1.2 Sweden .............................................................................................................................................. 89 7.1.3 Belgium and Netherlands ......................................................................................................... 89 7.1.4 United States of America ........................................................................................................... 90 7.1.5 Germany ........................................................................................................................................... 91 7.2 Multilateral ODA ............................................................................................................... 92 (ii) Biodiversity Expenditure Review 7.2.1 GEF ...................................................................................................................................................... 92 7.3 Non-Governmental Organizations .............................................................................. 95 7.4 Private Sector ..................................................................................................................... 97 7.4.1 Akagera Management Company ............................................................................................ 98 8. Total Biodiversity Expenditure ............................................................................... 99 8.1 Summary of Total Biodiversity Expenditures ......................................................... 99 8.2 Summary of Biodiversity Expenditures by BIOFIN Category .......................... 100 9. Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 102 List of Annexes ..................................................................................................................... 104 References ............................................................................................................................ 105 (iii) Biodiversity Expenditure Review List of Acronyms ABS Access and Benefits Sharing ARCOS Albertine Rift Conservation Society BAU Business as Usual BFP Budget Framework Paper BIOFIN Biodiversity Finance Initiative BMUB German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (German acronym) CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CoEB Center of Excellence in Biodiversity and Natural Resource Management CRS Creditor Reporting System DFID Department for International Development (U.K.) DFGFI Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International EDPRS Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy FONERWA Rwanda’s Green Fund for the Environment and Climate Change GEF Global Environment Facility GoR Government of Rwanda IKI International Climate Initiative (German acronym) MGVP Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project MINAGRI Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources MINECOFIN Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning MINIRENA Ministry of Natural Resources MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework NAEB National Agriculture Export Board NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan NIRDA National Industrial Research and Development Agency NGO Non-governmental organization ODA Official Development Assistance OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PEER Public Environmental Expenditure Review PIR Finance Policy and Institutional Review (BIOFIN) PSF Private Sector Federation RAB Rwanda Agriculture Board RDB Rwanda Development Board REMA Rwanda
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
    [Show full text]
  • Unhcr Rwanda | Fact Sheet
    UNHCR RWANDA | FACT SHEET Rwanda March 2021 HIGHLIGHTS A. Rwanda hosted a total of B. 17,644 Burundian refugees C. Rwanda has included refugees in 137,975 refugees and asylum in Rwanda voluntarily the national COVID-19 vaccination seekers at the end of February repatriated to Burundi since program. A total of 416 refugees have 2021. The population of concern August 2020. Most of the been vaccinated so far. As of 14 included mainly persons from the returnees are from Mahama March, 452 COVID-19 cases had been Democratic Republic of the Congo camp (17,256) compared to a identified among refugees, 433 had (56.3%) and Burundi (43.5%). small number of urban refugees recovered, 15 were still active and 4 (388). deaths had been recorded. KEY INDICATORS FUNDING (AS OF 16 MARCH 2021) 1,069 USD 90.1 million Refugees departed for resettlement and requested for Burundi, DR Congo, Emergency complementary pathways in 2020 and 31 since Transit Mechanism (ETM) in Rwanda. January 2021. Funded (18%) 515 Refugees and asylum seekers arrived in Rwanda in Emergency Transit Mechanism (ETM) since September 2019 and accommodated in Gashora Transit Centre. Unfunded (82%) UNHCR PRESENCE Staff: ■ 186 National Staff ■ 114 International Staff ■ 131 Affiliate (UNV, UNOPS, Refuge Point, and ICMC) Staff. Offices: ■ Representation Office in Kigali ■ Sub Office in Kirehe District ■ Field Offices in Huye, Karongi, Gicumbi, and Bugesera Districts. ■ Field Unit in Gatsibo District. www.unhcr.org /rw 1 FACT SHEET > Rwanda / March 2021 Working with Partners ■ The Government of Rwanda (GoR), through MINEMA, leads the refugee response in the country with UNHCR and partners providing direct operational support, capacity development, and technical advice to the local authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda LAND Report: Access to the Land Tenure Administration
    STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT July 2015` This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Written by: INES - Ruhengeri CONTACT INFORMATION: LAND Project Nyarutarama, Kigali Tel: +250 786 689 685 [email protected] STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT Subcontract No. AID=696-C-12-00002-INES-10 Chemonics International Recommended Citation: BIRARO, Mireille; KHAN, Selina; KONGUKA, George; NGABO, Valence; KANYIGINYA, Violet; TUMUSHERURE, Wilson and JOSSAM, Potel; 2015. Final Report of Study on the access to the land tenure administration system in Rwanda and the outcomes of the system on ordinary citizens. Kigali, Rwanda: USAID | LAND Project. September, 2015 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District Profile
    THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA District Profile Nyaruguru Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 Rwanda, Census, and Housing Fourth Population NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS OF RWANDA THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 District Profile Nyaruguru January 2015 The Fourth Rwanda Population and Housing Census (2012 RPHC) was implemented by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR). Field work was conducted from August 16th to 30th, 2012. The funding for the RPHC was provided by the Government of Rwanda, World Bank (WB), the UKAID (Former DFID), European Union (EU), One UN, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and UN Women. Additional information about the 2012 RPHC may be obtained from the NISR: P.O. Box 6139, Kigali, Rwanda; Telephone: (250) 252 571 035 E-mail: [email protected]; Website: http://www.statistics.gov.rw. Recommended citation: National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR), Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) [Rwanda]; 2012. Rwanda Fourth Population and Housing Census. District Profile: Nyaruguru xiii xv Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 District Profile:Nyaruguru iv Fourth Population and Housing Census, Rwanda, 2012 District Profile:Nyaruguru Table of Content Foreword ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nyamagabe District Development Plan [2008-2012]
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA SOUTHERN PROVINCE NYAMAGABE DISTRICT Nyamagabe District Development Plan [2008-2012] July 2007 Nyamagabe Distrcit Telephone (250) 53-5011 / 53-5012 / 53-5034 Fax (250) 53-5006 [email protected] www.nyamagabedistrict.gov.rw ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The successful preparation of Nyamagabe District Development Plan has been as a result of both physical and moral combined effort of several people to whom we hereby express our sencire appreciation and recognition. We thank the Government of Rwanda which, through different Ministries, supported the DDP process and has hitherto promised final support to the implementation of development projects contained therein. The District profoundly thanks all its development partners for their effective participation in the preparation of this document and the budget they have committed to its execution. In particular, the District would like to thank DCDP project for having financed all activities related to the preparation of this development plan. The District equally recognizes the special contribution of the PAGOR project and the field coordinator of Twubakane in Nyaruguru and Nyamagabe Districts for having actively participated in the finilisation of this document. The District expresses its deep gratitude to various consultants who guided the preparation of the District Development Plan process. We equally express our thanks to Nyamagabe District population for their unreserved participation in different consultative phases and their commitment to the implementation of the various DDP Projects. Lastly, all the District team and other persons not mentioned herein, who in various capacities, contributed to the preparation of this DDP, shall find in this document joy and pride of their constructive effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio
    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program was established in 1986 and resumed U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: in 2005 after a pause. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 24 Country Program Coordinator: Geoffrey Kayigi Africa Development Consultants projects and one Cooperative Agreement in Rwanda. PO Box 7210, CCOAIB Building, 3rd Floor Program Director: Rebecca Ruzibuka Total active commitment is $4.33 million. Agricultural investments Remera 1, Plot 2280, Umuganda Bld, Kigali Tel: +250.78.841.5194 total $3.66 million, off-grid energy investments total $348,778, and Tel: +250.78.830.3934 Email: [email protected] youth-led enterprise investments total $25,000. Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on smallholder farmer organizations across the country. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Coopérative des Agriculteurs de 2013-2017 $186,800 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize) Maïs de Nyanza Town/City: Nyanza District, Southern Province (COAMANYA) Summary: The project funds will be used to construct a new factory and purchase approved equipment 2904-RWA and to expand marshland cultivation to another 130 hectares which will directly contribute to an increase of income for over 2,000 persons and promote food security in the area. Funds are also being used to roll out a pilot version of an innovative plot-mapping information system. Coopérative pour le 2015-2017 $78,700 Sector: Processing (Honey) Développement des Apiculteurs et Town/City: Nyamagabe District, Southern Province la Protection de l'Environnement Summary: The project funds will be used to supply beehives, harvesting equipment and to develop an (CODAPE) administrative and financial procedures manual and business plan, as well as to cover key staff 4113-RWA members’ salaries and basic administrative costs to enhance the cooperative’s capacity and boost its honey production and sales revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY BRIEF Developing Muhanga District Findings from a Multidimensional Analysis
    I 2020 POLICY BRIEF Developing Muhanga District Findings from a Multidimensional Analysis SUMMARY Secondary cities matter a lot in the provision of a more balanced sustainable urban growth for the country. Stimulating urbanisation through the secondary city agenda is expected to create jobs and reduce poverty. These cities have the potential to act as poles of growth and relieve the pressure on Kigali, which currently dominates the Rwandan economy. With an eye on government target to achieve an urbanisation rate of 35% by 2024, IPAR-Rwanda has conducted an in-depth analysis of the opportunities and challenges which are faced by secondary cities. This policy brief aims at providing information and guiding deliberations on the development and strengthening of Muhanga, a district of 318,965 inhabitants, located in the Southern Province. It sets out an approach of workforce development, strategic planning and investments to create bottom-up growth and support for opportunity sectors to achieve this goal. Urbanised at a rate of 16% but with a high reliance on agriculture and service sectors, economic policy and infrastructure planning needs to be tailored to the urge to increase the market size of Muhanga. This can be done through rural-urban linkages and promoting urban density building on its strategic position as a hub for Kigali and the province and developing latent extractive and light manufacturing industries. A. Introduction: The vision for secondary cities1 The Government of Rwanda has put in place strong pressure on Kigali, the country’s economic hub. measures to plan and master its urbanisation for In order to unlock the potential of secondary cities, the future.
    [Show full text]
  • TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda
    TWUBAKANE Decentralization and Health Program Rwanda QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT #18 APRIL— JUNE 2009 USAID/Rwanda Cooperative Agreement # 623-A-00-05-00020-00 Distribution: USAID/Rwanda Twubakane Team Partners Government of Rwanda Ministry of Local Administration Ministry of Health National AIDS Control Commission Twubakane Steering Committee Members Twubakane Partner Districts NGOs, Bilateral and Multi-lateral Partner Agencies Twubakane Quarterly Report #18, April-June, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 TWUBAKANE PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS APRIL-JUNE, 2009 ............................................................ 2 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 2. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PROGRESS .......................................................................... 3 2.1 TWUBAKANE PROGRAM FIELD OFFICES ............................................................................ 4 3. PERFORMANCE REVIEW BY PROGRAM COMPONENT ........................................................ 4 3.1 FAMILY PLANNING/REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS AND QUALITY .............................. 4 3.2 CHILD SURVIVAL, MALARIA AND NUTRITION ACCESS AND QUALITY .............................. 7 3.3 DECENTRALIZATION PLANNING, POLICY AND MANAGEMENT ....................................... 10 3.4 DISTRICT-LEVEL CAPACITY BUILDING ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Economic Activity and Opportunity for Refugee Inclusion
    Report No: AUS0000807 . Rwanda Public Disclosure Authorized Economic Activity and Opportunity for Refugee Inclusion . Public Disclosure Authorized May 23, 2019 . URS . Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized . © 2019 The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: “World Bank (2019) Rwanda: Economic Activity and Opportunity for Refugee Inclusion. © World Bank.” All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. 2 Rwanda: Economic Activity and Opportunity for Refugee Inclusion (P169985) Ministry in Charge of Emergency Management World Bank May 2019 3 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by joint team from the Government of Rwanda’s Ministry in Charge of Emergency Management (MINEMA) and the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda EIN Web.Pdf
    G R I D UNEP Arendal AUST-AGDER Environmental Information for Change FYLKESKOMMUNE www.unep.org United Nations Environmnet Programme P.O.Box 30552 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-(0)20-62 1234 Fax: +254-(0)20-62 3927 E-mail:cpinfounep.org This report was prepared by the Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA) with technical and fi nan- cial support from UNEP/GRID-Arendal. For more information, please contact: Rwanda Environment Management Authority Kacyiru District This assessment report was guided by a questionnaire B.P. 7436 Kacyiru which, together with the fi ndings, is available online on Kigali City the GRID and REMA website addresses. Rwanda Tel +250 252 580101 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part in Fax +250 252 580017 any form for educational, research or non-profi t purposes www.rema.gov.rw without special permission from copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. REMA UNEP/GRID-Arendal and UNEP/GRID-Arendal would appreciate receiving a Teaterplassen 3 copy of any material that uses this publication as a source. N-4836 Arendal No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any Norway commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission Tel +47 47 64 45 55 in written form from the copyright holders. The use of Fax +47 37 03 50 50 information from this publication concerning proprietary [email protected] products for advertising is not permitted. www.grida.no Printed at Birkeland Trykkeri AS, Norway © 2010 REMA and UNEP/GRID-Arendal ISBN: 978-82-7701-089-2 Disclaimer UNEP & REMA promote The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the environmentally sound practices part of UNEP/GRID-Arendal nor REMA concerning the legal status of any globally and in its own activities.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR Rwanda Refugee Bulletin Issue No. 5
    Refugee Bulle n Issue number V March - May 2012 (N)CR RWANDA A refugee mother feeds her baby inside the laiterie , a disused milk factory serving as temporary shelter near the overflowing Nkamira Transit Centre IN,IDE T)I, I,,(E B B Anouck D BronCe (N)CR .ver 9,600 Congolese seek refuge in Rwanda p. 1-2 Rwanda copes with its Arst refugee influ2 since 20099 Re-registra on e2ercise complete p. 3 5overnment and inter-Agency response BPRM (,A visits Rwandan camps p. 3 Fighng broke out in North Kivu, Democrac Republic of the Congo (DRC) in April Bra4ilian donor visit to 5ihembe p. 3 2 12 between the Armed Forces of the Democrac Republic of the Congo (FARDC) 6iving as a refugee with a disability p. 7 and deserng troops inially loyal to renegade General Bosco Ntaganda, who is want- ed by the Internaonal Criminal Court for war crimes, including the recruitment of Refugee womanhood p. 5 child soldiers. The other 8olie9 an urgent appeal p. 5 On Friday 2,th April, 5 Congolese refugees crossed the grande barrière from Goma, DRC, into Gisenyi, Rwanda, with numbers swelling to over 1, by .unday 29th. By Environment and hygiene in Kiziba p. 0 the end of the following week, .unday 0th 1ay, 5,200 individuals were registered at 5enocide Commemora on p. 7 Nkamira Transit Centre, a facility 4ust 25kms from the border which normally hosts Rwandan returnees for a night or two before their onwards 4ourney home. Interview with our photographer p. 8 A mul-disciplinary team, consisng of the Government of Rwanda and seven 5N DAFI ,cholars9 the road ahead p.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Science and Technology
    COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING) DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND ENERGY ENGINEERING MASTER OF SCIENCE IN RENEWABLE ENERGY Master’s Thesis DOMESTIC SOLAR ENERGY AS SOLUTION FOR NON- CONNECTED RURAL AREAS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Master of Science in Renewable Energy Submitted by MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia(Ref.No: 215027386) PROJECT ID: UR/ MEE/MSC- REN /006/2019 July 2019 DOMESTIC SOLAR ENERGY AS SOLUTION FOR NON CONNECTED RURAL AREAS (CASE STUDY: KAMONYI DISTRICT, RWANDA.) MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia MASTER OF SCIENCE (RENEWABLE ENERGY) UNIVERSITY OF RWANDA COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. 2019 ii DOMESTIC SOLAR ENERGY AS SOLUTION FOR NOCONNECTED RURAL AREAS (CASE STUDY: KAMONYI DISTRICT, RWANDA.) MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia SUPERVISOR:Dr MAZIMPAKA Erneste iii DEDICATION To my precious family and parents iv DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Signature:.................................................Date......................................................... MUSHIMIYIMANA Assia This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the university supervisor Signature:...............................................Date............................................................. Dr Erneste MAZIMPAKA University of Rwanda v ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS First, I am thankful to my husband, my sons, my parents and my siblings who have always encouraged me, supported me moral and spiritual. Your love, your inspiration is vast. Lastly ,I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Ernest MAZIMPAKA who kindly pushed me, advised me, guided me through this journey ,i appreciated your work and i recognize it modestly. vi ABSTRACT The electricity demand is very high worldwide. The energy growing needs consideration of environment protection. Some alternatives have been taken such as using renewable energy.
    [Show full text]