DOCSLIB.ORG

Mathew Wedel, UCMP, Berkeley, CA 94720-4780 · [email protected] ·

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mathew Wedel, UCMP, Berkeley, CA 94720-4780 · Sauropod@Berkeley.Edu · PNEUMATICITY, NECK LENGTH, AND BODY SIZE IN SAUROPODS Mathew Wedel, UCMP, Berkeley, CA 94720-4780 · [email protected] · http://www.sauroposeidon.net/ ABSTRACT UPDATED! 4. HOW ARE THE VARIABLES RELATED? Long necks are synapomorphic for sauropods, and additional neck elongation occurred independently Organisms and their traits are not statistically independent because they are united by in different sauropod clades. Increases to 15 or more cervical vertebrae occurred at least four times, in common descent. Phylogenetically independent contrasts must be used to remove the effect of mamenchisaurs, diplodocids, Euhelopus, and Rapetosaurus. Necks longer than 10 meters also evolved at phylogeny from studies of character correlation (Felsenstein 1985). I used the PDAP module in least four times, in mamenchisaurs, diplodocids, brachiosaurids, and giant titanosaurs like Puertasaurus. The Mesquite v1.12 (Milford et al. 2005, Maddison & Maddison 2006) to test correlations among the longest-necked sauropod for which a rigorous estimate is possible is Supersaurus, which had a neck at least following: absolute neck length (ANL), trunk length (TL), femur length (FL), cervical count (CC), 13.7 meters long. The sauropods with the longest necks, such as Supersaurus, Sauroposeidon, and maximum elongation index (MEI), proportional neck length (PNL; ANL/TL), air space proportion Puertasaurus, are also among the largest known terrestrial vertebrates. (ASP). Pneumatic vertebrae facilitated neck elongation in sauropods. The lightest sauropod vertebrae were I ran two sets of tests. The first set included only the 15 taxa for which ASP values are known 89% air by volume and had a specific gravity (SG) of 0.22. By comparison, cervical vertebrae of the or could be reasonably estimated (see Table 1). The second set of tests included all 19 taxa in Table giraffe have an SG of 1.3, and are scarcely lighter than other postcranial elements (SGs up to 1.7). The 1, but did not include the ASP variable. Both sets of tests were run using four different tree cervical column of Brachiosaurus is 8.5 meters long but the vertebrae would have totaled less than 600 topologies: (1) the topology of Wilson (2002), with Massospondylus, Plateosaurus, and Cetiosaurus kilograms—about the same mass as the animal’s paired humeri, which are each only two meters long. C added, and prosauropods monophyletic; (2) the same topology but with prosauropods paraphyletic; The relationships between body size, neck length, and pneumaticity can be evaluated statistically using (3) the topology of Upchurch et al. (2004), with Massospondylus and Plateosaurus added, and EI phylogenetically independent contrasts. I used the PDAP module in Mesquite v1.06 to test the correlations prosauropods monophyletic; and (4) the topology of Rauhut et al. (2005), with Massospondylus, among femur length (FL), trunk length (TL), absolute neck length (ANL), proportional neck length (PNL; 16 Plateosaurus, and Cetiosaurus added, and prosauropods monophyletic. These phylogenetic neck length/dorsal length), cervical count (CC), maximum elongation index (MEI), and air space proportion rearrangements had very little effect on character correlation. ANL and FL are only correlated when (ASP) in 14 sauropodomorphs. ASP and the size-independent measures of neck length (PNL, CC, and MEI) the topology of Upchurch (2004) is used; otherwise the same statistically significant correlations form a pool of mutually-correlated variables (at p<0.05), as do the variables related to absolute size (FL, TL, were detected under all topologies. In addition, the same relationships are found among the and ANL). However, few significant correlations link the two pools. Neck elongation in sauropods is tied to variables other than ASP in the tests with 15 and 19 taxa. Statistical relationships among the 2 pneumaticity but largely independent from size-related variables. variables are shown below; black lines indicate significant correlations (r > 0.65, p < 0.05). INTRODUCTION MEI NECK PROPORTIONS Sauropods were the largest and longest-necked terrestrial animals of all time. The presacral vertebrae of most sauropods were filled with pneumatic spaces that would have greatly reduced the mass of the Figure 3. At roughly 600 kg, the 8.5-meter cervical series of Brachiosaurus had about 12 FL PNL vertebral column. The goal of this project is to answer the following questions: 15 the same mass as the animal’s paired 2-meter humeri. C 1. How many times did characters related to neck length and pneumaticity evolve ANL independently in sauropods? EI CC 3. HOW MUCH DOES PNEUMATICITY MATTER? TL 2. How long was the longest neck of any sauropod? In contrast to prosauropods and basal sauropods, mamenchisaurids and neosauropods had extensive 2. Was pneumaticity important in reducing the mass of sauropod vertebrae? vertebral pneumaticity. Percent pneumatization of the presacral vertebrae—the number of pneumatic elements ASP divided by the total presacral count—rose to a maximum early in sauropod evolution and was subject to only ABSOLUTE SIZE 3. Are variables related to pneumaticity, neck length, and body size statistically correlated? PNEUMATICITY one notable reversal, in dicraeosaurids (Table 1). The idea that pneumatic bones are lighter than marrow bones is intuitively appealing, but it needs to be tested. In particular, we need to know how much lighter pneumatic The variables related to absolute size (ANL, FL, and TL) and neck proportions (CC, MEI, 1. HOW MUCH HOMOPLASY? vertebrae are compared to apneumatic vertebrae if we want to understand any functional advantage. and PNL) share many correlations within pools but few correlations between pools: absolute neck Resolving characters on a phylogeny is a powerful tool for exploring evolutionary patterns. In The presacral vertebrae of most neosauropods were on average 60% air by volume (Wedel 2005, length is correlated with maximum elongation index and proportional neck length (and the latter particular, repeated evolution of characters in closely related lineages can elucidate shared developmental Woodward 2005, Schwarz & Fritsch 2006). The centrum walls, laminae, septa, and struts that composed the may be the result of autocorrelation, because PNL is based in part on ANL). Pneumaticity is processes and evolutionary trends. I collected character data by CT scanning and personal observation when Missing elements vertebrae are primarily made up of compact bone (Reid 1996). The specific gravity (SG) of compact bone is correlated with absolute and proportional neck length and cervical count. Importantly, in all possible, and from the literature when necessary (Table 1). The phylogeny shown here (Fig. 1) is broadly EI 2.0 in most tetrapods, so an element with an ASP of 0.60 would have an in vivo SG of 0.8. Some sauropod permutations none of the pneumaticity or neck proportion variables are correlated with femur length C vertebrae were much lighter. For example, Sauroposeidon had ASP values up to 0.89 and thus SG as low as or trunk length. congruent with several recent cladistic analyses (Wilson 2002, Upchurch et al. 2004, Rauhut et al. 2005, Increases in cervical count 17 Harris 2006), but agnostic about the relationships of several taxa that have proven to be unstable in those 15 0.22. On the other hand, many basal sauropods had ASPs of 0.30-0.40 and SG of 1.2-1.4. analyses (e.g., Cetiosaurus, Jobaria, and Haplocanthosaurus). To explore the impact of pneumaticity on skeletal construction, I estimated the in vivo mass of the CONCLUSIONS cervical skeleton of Brachiosaurus. From CT scans it is possible to calculate the volume of bone tissue in a The evolution of long necks in sauropods is marked by the repeated evolution of several important EI Elongation index > 4.0 1. Many characters related to neck length and pneumaticity evolved in parallel in different single vertebra and thus determine the mass of the element. I multiplied the mass of a single vertebra by scale characters, including the number of cervical vertebrae, the length of the individual vertebrae, the complexity 15 sauropod lineages. factors to determine the masses of the other vertebrae in the neck, and added the resulting values to estimate of vertebral internal structure, and the ratio of bone to air space. 2. Necks longer than 10 meters evolved independently in four sauropod clades. Supersaurus C Complex internal structure the mass of the whole cervical series. The mass of the cervical column of Brachiosaurus is 590 kilograms. For Cervical Count—If the primitive number of cervical vertebrae in Titanosauria is 13 (Gomani 2005), had the longest neck of any known animal: at least 13.7 meters, and possibly more than 16 the sake of comparison, I used graphic double integration (Hurlburt 1999) to estimate the mass of a then increases to 15 or more cervicals occurred at least four times: in the Mamenchisauridae, Diplodocidae, meters. Brachiosaurus humerus at 290 kg. The animal’s humeri are each 2 meters long but together they weighed as Euhelopus, and Rapetosaurus. Alternatively, 15 or more cervicals may be primitive for Somphospondyli, the 3. Pneumatic presacral vertebrae of neosauropods were, on average, 60% air by volume, and much as the 8.5-meter cervical series. The presacral vertebrae of Brachiosaurus have an average ASP of 0.67 lower counts in Malawisaurus and Saltasaurus may be reversals, and increases to 15 or more cervicals may therefore half as dense as the marrow bones of mammals. Figure 1. The evolution of long necks in sauropods. and a mean SG of 0.66. The cervical vertebrae of the giraffe are almost exactly twice as dense, with SG of 1.3 have only happened three times. The relatively primitive count of 13 cervicals in Brachiosaurus is 4. When the effects of phylogeny are removed by the use of independent contrasts, neck (Van Schalkwyk et al. 2004). If the cervical vertebrae of Brachiosaurus were built like those of a giraffe, they noteworthy; no other known sauropod had such a long neck with so few vertebrae.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Paleontograph______
    __________The Paleontograph________ A newsletter for those interested in all aspects of Paleontology Volume 5 Issue 1 March, 2016 _________________________________________________________________ From Your Editor Welcome to our latest issue. I hope you enjoyed the holidays. If you are anything like me, you are looking forward to Spring. We've had a mild winter here in CO. Weather is different than the east coast. While the nights are colder, the days are warmer. It's a nice change for me. I finally have my fossil lab up and running and I am spending my days, or part thereof, working off my backlog of fossils. It has been a couple of months since our last issue but Bob has kept writing and so we have an interesting issue for you to enjoy. The Paleontograph was created in 2012 to continue what was originally the newsletter of The New Jersey Paleontological Society. The Paleontograph publishes articles, book reviews, personal accounts, and anything else that relates to Paleontology and fossils. Feel free to submit both technical and non-technical work. We try to appeal to a wide range of people interested in fossils. Articles about localities, specific types of fossils, fossil preparation, shows or events, museum displays, field trips, websites are all welcome. This newsletter is meant to be one by and for the readers. Issues will come out when there is enough content to fill an issue. I encourage all to submit contributions. It will be interesting, informative and fun to read. It can become whatever the readers and contributors want it to be, so it will be a work in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimorean Debunks Dinosaur Finds :Specialist B Comparison of Bones Shows 'New' Species Long Known
    1I1(1St) THE WASIfINGTON POST WEDNESDAY, MAY ll, 1988 A3 I ,I .Baltimorean Debunks Dinosaur Finds :Specialist B Comparison of Bones Shows 'New' Species Long Known several partial skeletons of different By Boyce Rensberger seum collections. He has also dis- Washington Po.'1l Stolff Writer covered several errors in previous sizes. reconstructions of the Brachiosau- Paul found that, while the Ultra- It is time to rewrite the record rus skeleton and corrected them in saurus bone is bigger than the com- book for dinosaurs, according to a his illustrations to reveal the ani- parable bone displayed in East Ber- leading expert on the extinct giants. mals as having a shorter trunk and lin, it is about the same size as a ' Contrary to a series of allegedly taller forelimbs, which give it a Brachiosaurus shoulder bone not on record-breaking discoveries' that more giraffe-like image than pre- display. began in 1972, the largest known vious experts have suggested. In fact, Paul concluded, the bones dinosaur really is a species known Brachiosaurus "is the only Quad- are so similar that Supersaurus and since the early 1900s, the familiar rupedal dinosaur which one would Ultrasaurus are "almost certainly" Brachiosaurus. have to reach up to slap the belly as not separate species but simply ad- The newest finding by Gregory one walked under it," Paul said. ditional examples of Brachiosaurus. S. Paul, a self-taught dinosaur spe- "Most unusual for a tetrapod [four- Paul's reconstruction of the skel- cialist from Baltimore, debunks legged animal]. much less a dino- eton also scales back estimates of "discovery" of Supersaurus in 1972, saur, it is an exceptionally elegant the beasts' weight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Second Edition
    MASS ESTIMATES - DINOSAURS ETC (largely based on models) taxon k model femur length* model volume ml x specific gravity = model mass g specimen (modeled 1st):kilograms:femur(or other long bone length)usually in decameters kg = femur(or other long bone)length(usually in decameters)3 x k k = model volume in ml x specific gravity(usually for whole model) then divided/model femur(or other long bone)length3 (in most models femur in decameters is 0.5253 = 0.145) In sauropods the neck is assigned a distinct specific gravity; in dinosaurs with large feathers their mass is added separately; in dinosaurs with flight ablity the mass of the fight muscles is calculated separately as a range of possiblities SAUROPODS k femur trunk neck tail total neck x 0.6 rest x0.9 & legs & head super titanosaur femur:~55000-60000:~25:00 Argentinosaurus ~4 PVPH-1:~55000:~24.00 Futalognkosaurus ~3.5-4 MUCPv-323:~25000:19.80 (note:downsize correction since 2nd edition) Dreadnoughtus ~3.8 “ ~520 ~75 50 ~645 0.45+.513=.558 MPM-PV 1156:~26000:19.10 Giraffatitan 3.45 .525 480 75 25 580 .045+.455=.500 HMN MB.R.2181:31500(neck 2800):~20.90 “XV2”:~45000:~23.50 Brachiosaurus ~4.15 " ~590 ~75 ~25 ~700 " +.554=~.600 FMNH P25107:~35000:20.30 Europasaurus ~3.2 “ ~465 ~39 ~23 ~527 .023+.440=~.463 composite:~760:~6.20 Camarasaurus 4.0 " 542 51 55 648 .041+.537=.578 CMNH 11393:14200(neck 1000):15.25 AMNH 5761:~23000:18.00 juv 3.5 " 486 40 55 581 .024+.487=.511 CMNH 11338:640:5.67 Chuanjiesaurus ~4.1 “ ~550 ~105 ~38 ~693 .063+.530=.593 Lfch 1001:~10700:13.75 2 M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sauropodomorph Biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of Southern Africa: Tracking the Evolution of Sauropodomorpha Across the Triassic–Jurassic Boundary
    Editors' choice The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary BLAIR W. MCPHEE, EMESE M. BORDY, LARA SCISCIO, and JONAH N. CHOINIERE McPhee, B.W., Bordy, E.M., Sciscio, L., and Choiniere, J.N. 2017. The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3): 441–465. The latest Triassic is notable for coinciding with the dramatic decline of many previously dominant groups, followed by the rapid radiation of Dinosauria in the Early Jurassic. Among the most common terrestrial vertebrates from this time, sauropodomorph dinosaurs provide an important insight into the changing dynamics of the biota across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. The Elliot Formation of South Africa and Lesotho preserves the richest assemblage of sauropodomorphs known from this age, and is a key index assemblage for biostratigraphic correlations with other simi- larly-aged global terrestrial deposits. Past assessments of Elliot Formation biostratigraphy were hampered by an overly simplistic biozonation scheme which divided it into a lower “Euskelosaurus” Range Zone and an upper Massospondylus Range Zone. Here we revise the zonation of the Elliot Formation by: (i) synthesizing the last three decades’ worth of fossil discoveries, taxonomic revision, and lithostratigraphic investigation; and (ii) systematically reappraising the strati- graphic provenance of important fossil locations. We then use our revised stratigraphic information in conjunction with phylogenetic character data to assess morphological disparity between Late Triassic and Early Jurassic sauropodomorph taxa. Our results demonstrate that the Early Jurassic upper Elliot Formation is considerably more taxonomically and morphologically diverse than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]
  • Mi Querido Brontosaurus.Indd
    A pesar de haberse extinguido hace 65 millones de años, los dinosaurios ocupan un lugar primordial en el imaginario po- pular. Su portentosa presencia llena mu- seos de historia natural y protagoniza pe- lículas, y sin embargo es poco lo que aún sabemos sobre ellos. Con un entusiasmo contagioso, Brian Switeck nos acerca a la vida de estas criaturas y nos descubre al- gunos de sus fascinantes secretos. «Una delicia. Es el libro defi nitivo sobre dinosaurios.» Th e New York Times BRIAN SWITEK es periodista científi co, y actualmente trabaja como reportero para National Geographic. PVP 20,90 € 10038994 www.ariel.es ,!7II4D4-ebhcdg! 25 mm Brian Switek Mi querido Brontosaurus Una expedición científi ca al encuentro de nuestros dinosaurios favoritos Traducción de Joandomènec Ros, catedrático de Ecología de la Universidad de Barcelona Título original: My Beloved Brontosaurus Publicado originalmente por Scientifi c American en colaboración con Farrar Straus & Giroux 1.ª edición: marzo de 2014 © 2013, Brian Switeck © 2014, de la traducción Joandomènec Ros Derechos exclusivos de edición en español reservados para todo el mundo y propiedad de la traducción: © 2014: Editorial Planeta, S. A. Avda. Diagonal, 662-664 - 08034 Barcelona Editorial Ariel es un sello editorial de Planeta, S. A. www.ariel.es www.espacioculturalyacademico.com ISBN: 978-84-344-1723-6 Depósito legal: B. 2.190 - 2014 Impreso en España Por Huertas Industrias Gráfi cas El papel utilizado para la impresión de este libro es cien por cien libre de cloro y está califi cado como papel ecológico. No se permite la reproducción total o parcial de este libro, ni su incorporación a un sistema informático, ni su transmisión en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea éste electrónico, mecánico, por fotocopia, por grabación u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y por escrito del editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Postcranial Skeletal Pneumaticity in Sauropods and Its
    Postcranial Pneumaticity in Dinosaurs and the Origin of the Avian Lung by Mathew John Wedel B.S. (University of Oklahoma) 1997 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kevin Padian, Co-chair Professor William Clemens, Co-chair Professor Marvalee Wake Professor David Wake Professor John Gerhart Spring 2007 1 The dissertation of Mathew John Wedel is approved: Co-chair Date Co-chair Date Date Date Date University of California, Berkeley Spring 2007 2 Postcranial Pneumaticity in Dinosaurs and the Origin of the Avian Lung © 2007 by Mathew John Wedel 3 Abstract Postcranial Pneumaticity in Dinosaurs and the Origin of the Avian Lung by Mathew John Wedel Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Kevin Padian, Co-chair Professor William Clemens, Co-chair Among extant vertebrates, postcranial skeletal pneumaticity is present only in birds. In birds, diverticula of the lungs and air sacs pneumatize specific regions of the postcranial skeleton. The relationships among pulmonary components and the regions of the skeleton that they pneumatize form the basis for inferences about the pulmonary anatomy of non-avian dinosaurs. Fossae, foramina and chambers in the postcranial skeletons of pterosaurs and saurischian dinosaurs are diagnostic for pneumaticity. In basal saurischians only the cervical skeleton is pneumatized. Pneumatization by cervical air sacs is the most consilient explanation for this pattern. In more derived sauropods and theropods pneumatization of the posterior dorsal, sacral, and caudal vertebrae indicates that abdominal air sacs were also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Omeisaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda)
    第57卷 第2期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 pp. 105–116 figs. 1–3 2019年4月 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.181115 Discovery of Omeisaurus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) in the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation of Yunyang, Chongqing, China TAN Chao1 DAI Hui1 HE Jian-Jun1 ZHANG Feng1 HU Xu-Feng1 YU Hai-Dong1 LI Ning1 WEI Guang-Biao2 PENG Guang-Zhao3 YE Yong3 ZHANG Qian-Nan4,5,6 REN Xin-Xin4,5,6 YOU Hai-Lu4,5,6* (1 Chongqing Laboratory of Geological Heritage Protection and Research, No. 208 Hydrogeological and Engineering Geological Team, Chongqing Bureau of Geological and Mineral Resource Exploration and Development Chongqing 400700) (2 Chongqing Institute of Geological Survey Chongqing 401122) (3 Zigong Dinosaur Museum Zigong, Sichuan 643013) (4 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044) (5 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment Beijing 100044) (6 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 * Corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract A cervical vertebra recovered from the Middle Jurassic Lower Member of the Shaximiao Formation in Town of Puan, Yunyang County, Chongqing is assigned to an species undeterminata of the sauropod dinosaur Omeisaurus based on morphological and comparative study. The centrum of this mid-cervical is much hollower than solider with extremely developed fossa/foramen complex and has a high ratio (5.05) of its anteroposterior length excluding the articular ball divided by the mean value of the posterior articular surface mediolateral width and dorsoventral height.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Sauropod from the Late Jurassic of the Sichuan Basin (Mamenchisaurus Jingyanensis Sp. Nov.)
    A new species of sauropod from the Late Jurassic of the Sichuan Basin (Mamenchisaurus jingyanensis sp. nov.) by Yihong Zhang*, Kui Li**, and Qinghua Zeng*** *Chongqing Natural History Museum **Chengdu University of Technology ***Management Office of Cultural Relicts, Jingyan County, Sichuan Journal of the Chengdu University of Technology Volume 25, Number 1 January, 1998 pp. 61-68 Translated By Will Downs Bilby Research Center Northern Arizona University January, 2001 Abstract The text describes new specimens of a large sauropod collected from the Upper Jurassic Upper Shaximiao Fm. in the Sichuan basin erected as Mamenchisaurus jingyanensis sp. nov. The new species further substantiates the genus Mamenchisaurus Young, 1954 and the inclusion of the family Mamenchisauridae within the superfamily Bothrosauropodoidea. Introduction At the end of the 1970’s and beginning of the 1990’s, the Chongqing (Chungking) Natural History Museum in collaboration with the Jingyan County Management Office of Cultural Relics conducted a series of sauropod excavations in the Upper Jurassic Upper (Shang) Shaximiao Fm. from the localities of Sanjiang and Meiwang, Yanxian Co. and Dujia, Rongxian Co. The humerus collected from Dujia was previously identified by Zhiming Dong as belonging to Mamenchisaurus (Dong et al., 1983), the remaining specimens were long since left unidentified due to the absence of diagnostic comparative specimens. Recent publications on more diagnostic data resulting in the erection of M. youngi and M. anyuensis allows the Rongxian and Jingyan specimens to be reevaluated for diagnosis. This text provides brief descriptions of these specimens for future reference. Description Saurischia Seeley, 1888 Sauropodomorpha Huene, 1932 Sauropoda Marsh, 1878 Bothrosauropodoidea Young, 1958 Mamenchisauridae Young and Chao, 1972 Mamenchisaurus Young, 1954 Mamenchisaurus jingyanensis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Hall
    Dinosaur Hall 101 Dinosaur Hall Exhibit Overarching Stories In the exhibit, Dinosaurs: Explore Their Mysteries… • Experience the ways our scientists have assembled answers to many fascinating questions about their lives and their worlds. • By piecing together clues in the fossil record, we discover more about the fascinating world of dinosaurs. • How do Museum paleontologists know what they know …and what they don’t! 2 The Dinosaur Hall exhibit is broken up into sections with overarching questions. Dinosaur Hall Floor Layout, Level 1 Entrance/exit What F happened to dinosaurs? First Floor E What were What is a What was their dinosaurs dinosaur? world like? D like? Entrance/exit C A B Expeditions 3 Dinosaur Hall Floor Layout, Level 2 Mezzanine Level Work in the field I H Work in the lab Pterosaurs; Dinosaurs in California G 4 What is a dinosaur? 5 What are dinosaurs? • Origins from the Greek words deinos: “fearfully-great or terrible” and sauros lizard; name given by famous paleontologist Richard Owen in 1842 6 Characteristics of a Dinosaur Classifying Dinosaurs: Cladogram 8 When dinosaurs ruled on land*… Dinosaurs lived during the Mesozoic Era, a.k.a. ‘Age of Dinosaurs,’ which is divided into three periods *Not only did dinosaurs live on land, there is evidence of dinosaurs thriving in bodies of water… A commonly asked question: “Are those real fossils?” • Most skeletons on display have a mix of real fossils and casts, or reproductions. Most often the reproductions are based off a real fossil. • Labels will help you determine! Look for the specimen name, if there’s (cast) next to the name, it’s a reproduction or replica.
    [Show full text]