Analogical Processes and College Developmental Reading
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analogical Processes and College Developmental Reading By Eric J. Paulson Abstract: Although a solid body of research is analogical. An analogical process involves concerning the role of analogies in reading processes the identification of partial similarities between has emerged at a variety of age groups and reading different objects or situations to support further proficiencies, few of those studies have focused on inferences and is used to explain new concepts, analogy use by readers enrolled in college develop- solve problems, and understand new areas and mental reading courses. The current study explores ideas (Gentner, & Colhoun, 2010; Gentner & Smith, whether 232 students enrolled in mandatory (by 2012). For example, when a biology teacher relates placement test) developmental reading courses the functions of a cell to the activities in a factory in in a postsecondary educational context utilize order to introduce and explain the cell to students, analogical processes while engaged in specific this is an analogical process designed to use what reading activities. This is explored through two is already familiar to illuminate and explain a separate investigations that focus on two different new concept. A process of mapping similarities ends of the reading spectrum: the word-decoding between a source (what is known) and a target Analogy appears to be a key level and the overall text-comprehension level. (what is needed to be known) in order to better element of human thinking. The two investigations reported here build on understand the target (Holyoak & Thagard, 1997), comparable studies of analogy use with proficient analogies are commonly used to make sense of readers. Results indicate clear use of analogy at the new information in general. Scholars in cogni- decoding level of reading with trends toward some tive psychology have argued that many aspects types of analogy use facilitating comprehension at of thinking are analogical in nature, with some whole-text levels of reading. concluding that analogical processes form a core aspect of human cognition (e.g., Hofstader, 2001; Developmental reading courses are typically Kurtz, Miao, & Gentner, 2001). Supporting this designed to increase the reading proficiency of view of the integral nature of analogy to cognition college students who are underprepared for college- is its use by even very young children. Holyoak and level reading. Existing at U.S. higher education Thagard (1995) report that infants are able to use institutions since the beginning of the 20th century basic analogical processes, and by the time children (Kingston, 2003), developmental reading has his- are 5 or 6 years old, they are able to use complex torically been a core part of developmental educa- analogies for many purposes. In short, analogy tion offerings in two- and four-year colleges (Stahl appears to be a key element of human thinking. & King, 2009). Reading difficulties have been judged Reading is a sociocognitive process of making to be “the most serious” developmental proficiency sense of information presented through text, and issue (Adelman, 2004, p. 87) for college students. difficulties in reading can be intensified when the With recent analyses of ACT college entrance test text involves unfamiliar content and new words. scores indicating that fewer than half of incoming Because of the core nature of analogy in human college students nation-wide were prepared for the learning, its role in a sociocognitive process like reading requirements of a typical first-year college reading warrants exploration. This article inves- course (ACT, 2013), developmental reading sup- tigates analogical processes in reading, at a basic port at the postsecondary level is prevalent and an word decoding level and at a higher, whole-text important part of a college education for a significant comprehension level. number of students. Research that allows for a fuller understanding of developmental reading processes, Research on Analogical Processes and with implications for instruction, is important. This Reading study investigates the role of analogical processing Eric J. Paulson Professor, Doctoral Program in Developmental during the reading process for students who place From a theoretical standpoint, analogy use in Education into developmental reading courses. reading can be directly related to schema-theoretic Texas State University Analogical Processes explanations for reading comprehension. Hofstader 601 University Drive (2001, p. 504) described any “triggering of prior San Marcos, TX 78666-4684 In a general educational sense, one key process mental categories by some kind of input—whether [email protected] by which people make sense of new information sensory or more abstract” as a process of analogy 2 JOURNAL of DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION construction. Schemata are those “mental catego- of relating the new word to a known word in order Hammadou (2000) took a similar approach ries”—as well as concepts and structures—that to read aloud the new word. For example, reading in examining analogy use during reading, look- help us make sense of the world. Schema theory the unfamiliar word “tepherd” by a letter-sound ing at reading in a second language as well as first notes that new information is processed through rule application would result in /teferd/, where language in college students (the first-language interaction with old information, resulting in what the “ph” digraph would be pronounced /f/ as in aspects of her study are of interest here). Four pas- is known as comprehension (Anderson & Pearson, “phone.” Alternatively, reading “tepherd” by anal- sages were used with two versions each. Students 1984). Specific to reading, this means that a reader’s ogy strategy would result in /teperd/ by analogy to read either a baseline text or a version of that text ability to comprehend a text is directly related to the known word “shepherd.” Marsh et al. (1977) with an analogy embedded within it, similar to the reader having the appropriate schemata (see reported that when knowledge of the analog source the approach taken by Bean et al. (1990). Students Anderson, 2013; Faris & Smeltzer, 1997). Reading was accounted for—that is, in order to use the word read the version they were assigned, then wrote involves a constant, albeit many times implicit and “shepherd” as an analog to read the unfamiliar everything they could recall from the passage on nondeliberate, comparison of the new informa- word “tepherd,” the reader would have to know a separate sheet of paper. The written recalls were tion in the text to what the reader already knows the word “shepherd”—they found that the 5th scored using Meyer’s (1985) idea-units analysis about the topic of the text in order to make sense grade group used an analogy strategy 39.5% of the protocol. Results indicated a trend toward better of what is being read. This is an analogical process. time, the 11th grade group used an analogy strategy recall of the nonanalogy versions of the text; for Because reading is not a monolithic entity, this 41.12% of the time, and the college group used an one pair of analogy/no-analogy versions, it was article addresses analogical processing in reading analogy strategy 56% of the time. a nonstatistically significant trend and for the in terms of more than a single measure of reading. other pair of text versions there was a statistically Specifically, a focus on decoding words and on Experienced Readers’ Use of Analogy significant difference of better comprehension on more holistic comprehension of whole texts are in Whole-Text Reading the no-analogy version. both included. Clement and Yanowitz (2003) investigated reading Purpose of the Current Study Experienced Readers’ Use of Analogy processes at a more holistic, whole-text level and Despite the amount of attention that the role of to Decode Words analogies in reading processes has received at a variety of age groups and reading proficiencies, Using analogical processes to assimilate and Verbally producing a there has been little research that focuses on anal- accommodate new information during reading ogy use by students enrolled in developmental is an important aspect of reading at a variety of early word accurately does reading classes at the postsecondary level. As such, reading levels (e.g., Farrington-Flint & Wood, 2007; of interest here is whether—and if so, how—read- Goswami, 2013; Wang & Gaffney, 1998). The use not necessarily imply ers at this level utilize analogical processes during of analogical processes appears to be an important comprehension of that word. reading. aspect of more experienced and proficient reading As noted, two “levels” of reading processes as well, though research at this higher level is not have been focused on in studies that have investi- nearly as widespread as research at the emergent- found that college students were able to analogically gated analogical processes. One level is described reading level. relate the information in a source text to that of an here as the “decoding” level. At this level, readers Kay and Marcel’s (1981) early research dem- unfamiliar, target text in order to problem-solve utilize knowledge of sound-symbol correspon- onstrated how older readers’ reading of nonsense in the target text. That is, where the source text dence to verbally produce combinations of letters words that had multiple acceptable pronunciations explicitly modeled a solution to a problem in one according to accepted convention, which can be was affected by the real words that immediately arena, readers were able to use that text to bet- thought of as “reading a word aloud.” Although a preceded the nonsense word. For example, when ter understand the target text in another arena. general indicator of comprehension and correlate presented with a list of words, readers were likely Bean, Searles, and Cowen (1990) also investigated of reading ability, verbally producing a word accu- analogy use at the whole-text comprehension level rately does not necessarily imply comprehension to read the nonsense word “yead” as /yɛd/ (rhymes with a study designed to “explore the impact of of that word or its use.