DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of 20Th Century High-Rises and Implications for Preservation Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of 20Th Century High-Rises and Implications for Preservation Philosophy University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation January 2007 The Interplay of Technology and Durability: The Evolution of 20th Century High-Rises and Implications for Preservation Philosophy Ellen C. Buckley University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Buckley, Ellen C., "The Interplay of Technology and Durability: The Evolution of 20th Century High-Rises and Implications for Preservation Philosophy" (2007). Theses (Historic Preservation). 64. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/64 A Thesis in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Historic Preservation 2007. Advisor: Michael C. Henry This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/64 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Interplay of Technology and Durability: The Evolution of 20th Century High- Rises and Implications for Preservation Philosophy Comments A Thesis in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Historic Preservation 2007. Advisor: Michael C. Henry This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/64 THE INTERPLAY OF TECHNOLOGY AND DURABILITY: THE EVOLUTION OF 20TH-CENTURY HIGH-RISES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRESERVATION PHILOSOPHY Ellen C. Buckley A THESIS in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2007 ____________________ ____________________ Advisor Reader Michael C. Henry, AIA, PE David N. Fixler, AIA Lecturer, Historic Preservation Principal, Einhorn, Yaffee, Prescott Partner, Watson & Henry Assoc. ____________________ _____________________ Program Chair Reader Frank G. Matero Donovan Rypkema Professor of Architecture Principal, PlaceEconomics Idedicatethisthesistomyfamily,whoseunwaveringsupporthasguidedmethrough everypursuitI’veundertaken. ii Acknowledgments I owe a debt of gratitude to my family, my friends, and my advisors who supported me through this thesis. My family’s support and love always carries me through challenging projects and my friends provide support, lots of laughs, and a sounding board. I especially want to thank Patrice and Mandy for their encouragement, numerous therapeutic stories and lyrics, and for pushing through this past year together. I also wish to thank Jim for putting up with me throughout this stressful time and for consistently encouraging me and listening to my thoughts about this topic. My advisor, Michael C. Henry, offered a helpful forum for discussing the objective and challenges of my thesis from the inception of the idea through completion. I thank him for his insightful comments and suggestions. I also wish to thank my reader, David Fixler, who took the time to carefully read this document and make meaningful comments, which helped clarify my argument and strengthened my thesis. His suggestions were always on target and were an invaluable contribution. Finally, I want to thank Donovan Rypkema not only for his comments on this thesis, but also for teaching me about the economic component integral to preserving buildings of any vintage. iii I would also like to thank the following people who made significant contributions to my research: William Whitaker Architectural Archives, University of Pennsylvania Julie Tozer Avery Architectural Library, Columbia University Bernard Camins Camins Associates, Philadelphia, PA Kathryn Bourke Faithful + Gould Consulting, UK Peter Flynn Flynn Battaglia Architects Martha Mathewson Flynn Battaglia Architects Kirsten Sibilia FxFowle Architects (New York) Jessica Wyman FxFowle Architects (New York) Kelly New York Historical Society, Print Room Emma White Skyscraper Museum Jason Kirkweg State of Missouri, Design Department (Wainwright Bldg) Dr. Takashi Nireki Tsukuba Building Test Laboratory, Japan Timothy Allanbrook Wise Janney Elstner (New York) Stephen Kelley Wise Janney Elstner (Chicago) Anthony Cinnamon Wise Janney Elstner (Chicago) iv Table of Contents Acknowledgments........................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ..............................................................................................................vii List of Drawings......................................................................................................... viii List of Graphs............................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1: Introduction..................................................................................................1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................3 Modern Movement..........................................................................................................................3 Technology .....................................................................................................................................11 Service Life .....................................................................................................................................17 Preservation Philosophy...............................................................................................................24 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................28 Chapter 3: Methodology ..............................................................................................29 Methodology: Approach...............................................................................................................29 Methodology: Applied ..................................................................................................................33 Chapter 4: High-rises c. 1900 .......................................................................................36 Guaranty Building..........................................................................................................................36 Construction ..............................................................................................................................37 Service Life Analysis .................................................................................................................40 Woolworth Building......................................................................................................................45 Construction ..............................................................................................................................45 Service Life Analysis .................................................................................................................48 Chapter 5: High-rises c. 1925 ....................................................................................... 51 PSFS Building.................................................................................................................................51 Construction ..............................................................................................................................53 Service Life Analysis .................................................................................................................55 Chapter 6: High-rises c. 1950 .......................................................................................59 Lever House ...................................................................................................................................59 Construction ..............................................................................................................................59 Service Life Analysis .................................................................................................................60 Alcoa Building................................................................................................................................66 Construction ..............................................................................................................................67 Service Life Analysis .................................................................................................................69 Seagram Building ...........................................................................................................................73 Construction ..............................................................................................................................75 Service Life Analysis .................................................................................................................77 Chapter 7: High-rises c. 1975 .......................................................................................82 Citicorp Center...............................................................................................................................82 Construction ..............................................................................................................................84
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read Where Architecture Expert Paul Goldberg Comments on the History of New York's Famous Skyscrapers. As You Do So, Complete
    Can you identify any of these buildings? What do they all have in common? Which one do you like best? Read where architecture expert Paul Goldberg comments on the history of New York’s famous skyscrapers. As you do so, complete the following tasks: · In New York buildings are not only buildings, they become ___________________ · New York took over Chicago as regards skyscrapers in ___________________. · The Woolworth building was the tallest building worldwide for _________________. · The _______________ defined the Manhattan skyline. · They are trying to keep a memory of the people who were lost and also to show New York’s ______________________________. · New York stands out from the other cities as the embodiment of ____________________. Woolworth Building; Empire State Building; Chrysler Building; Flatiron; Hearst Tower The Woolworth Building, at 57 stories (floors), is one of the oldest—and one of the most famous—skyscrapers in New York City. It was the world’s tallest building for 17 years. More than 95 years after its construction, it is still one of the fifty tallest buildings in the United States as well as one of the twenty tallest buildings in New York City. The building is a National Historic Landmark, having been listed in 1966. The Empire State Building is a 102-story landmark Art Deco skyscraper in New York City at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and West 34th Street. Like many New York building, it has become seen as a work of art. Its name is derived from the nickname for New York, The Empire State. It stood as the world's tallest building for more than 40 years, from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower was completed in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Elevator Interior Design
    C AMB RIDGE A select portfolio of architectural mesh projects for new or refurbished elevator cabs, lobbies and high-traffic spaces featuring Cambridge’s metal mesh. ARCHITECTURAL MESH Beautiful, light-weight and durable, architectural mesh has been prized by architects and designers since we first wove metal fabric for the elevator cabs in Mies van der Rohe’s Seagram Building in 1958. And it’s still there today. Learn more about our elite line of elegant panels in stainless steel, brass, copper and aluminum. Carnegie Hall, New York City Elegant burnished aluminum panels lift Carnegie Hall’s elevator interiors to another level. Installed by EDI/ECI in concert with Iu + Biblowicz Architects, Comcast Center, Philadelphia, PA Cambridge’s Sawgrass pattern adds When designing the a refined and resilient interior to world’s tallest green this refurbished masterpiece. building, Robert A.M. © Gbphoto27 | Dreamstime.com Stern Architects added style and sustainability with Empire State Building, Cambridge mesh. New York City Classically outfitted Beyer, Blinder & with the chic Ritz pattern, the flexible Belle Architects stainless steel fabric integrates the modernized the lobby and elevators with a smooth landmark and seamless design. skyscraper’s elevator cabs with Cambridge’s Stipple mesh. Installed by the National Elevator Cab & Door Co., the dappled brushed aluminum surface stands up to the traffic and traditions of this legendary building. Victory Plaza, Dallas, TX TFO Architecture’s YAHOO!, Sunnyvale, CA expansive mixed-use project in the center Gensler architects of downtown selected Cambridge’s incorporates one of Silk mesh to clad Cambridge’s most elevators at Yahoo’s popular rigid mesh Silicon Valley fabrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagram Building, First Floor Interior
    I.andmarks Preservation Commission october 3, 1989; Designation List 221 IP-1665 SEAGRAM BUIIDING, FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR consisting of the lobby and passenger elevator cabs and the fixtures and interior components of these spaces including but not limited to, interior piers, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, railings, elevator doors, elevator indicators, and signs; 375 Park Avenue, Manhattan. Designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe with Philip Johnson; Kahn & Jacobs, associate architects. Built 1956-58. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1307, Lot 1. On May 17, 1988, the landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Seagram Building, first floor interior, consisting of the lobby and passenger elevator cabs and the fixtures and interior components of these spaces including but not limited to, interior piers, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, railings, elevator doors, elevator indicators, and signs; and the proposed designation of the related I.and.mark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Twenty witnesses, including a representative of the building's owner, spoke in favor of designation. No witnesses spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters in favor of designation. DFSCRIPI'ION AND ANALYSIS Summary The Seagram Building, erected in 1956-58, is the only building in New York City designed by architectural master Iudwig Mies van der Rohe. Constructed on Park Avenue at a time when it was changing from an exclusive residential thoroughfare to a prestigious business address, the Seagram Building embodies the quest of a successful corporation to establish further its public image through architectural patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seagram Building, Designed by Mies Van Der Rohe, Continues To
    The Seagram Building, designed by Mies van der Rohe, continues to receive acclaim as New York’s most prestigious office building and the finest example of modern American architecture. We are proud to own this great asset and are committed to ensuring that this Landmark building offers the utmost standards of excellence and service to all of our tenants. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 375 Park Avenue is widely recognized as building was the first skyscraper in New one of the iconic structures of post-World York City to use floor-to-ceiling plate glass. War II International Style architecture, and is The glazing system in turn required special among the most significant works of Ludwig mechanical innovations such as a specially Mies van der Rohe and Philip Johnson, two designed peripheral air conditioning system of the most important architects of the 20th consisting of low modular units, which would century. From the time of its completion, the cool the building without obstructing views. building has been hailed as one of the most important works of American architecture. The New York Times called it “one of the most notable of Manhattan’s post-war buildings,” At the time of construction, the Seagram and said of the plaza that it had become Building set the gold standard for post- “an oasis for office workers and passersby.” war corporate architecture in America. The In addition to critical praise, the Seagram influence of the building on the course of Building and its architects received a American architecture can be seen up number of awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism 1 Modernism
    Modernism 1 Modernism Modernism, in its broadest definition, is modern thought, character, or practice. More specifically, the term describes the modernist movement, its set of cultural tendencies and array of associated cultural movements, originally arising from wide-scale and far-reaching changes to Western society in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Modernism was a revolt against the conservative values of realism.[2] [3] [4] Arguably the most paradigmatic motive of modernism is the rejection of tradition and its reprise, incorporation, rewriting, recapitulation, revision and parody in new forms.[5] [6] [7] Modernism rejected the lingering certainty of Enlightenment thinking and also rejected the existence of a compassionate, all-powerful Creator God.[8] [9] In general, the term modernism encompasses the activities and output of those who felt the "traditional" forms of art, architecture, literature, religious faith, social organization and daily life were becoming outdated in the new economic, social, and political conditions of an Hans Hofmann, "The Gate", 1959–1960, emerging fully industrialized world. The poet Ezra Pound's 1934 collection: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. injunction to "Make it new!" was paradigmatic of the movement's Hofmann was renowned not only as an artist but approach towards the obsolete. Another paradigmatic exhortation was also as a teacher of art, and a modernist theorist articulated by philosopher and composer Theodor Adorno, who, in the both in his native Germany and later in the U.S. During the 1930s in New York and California he 1940s, challenged conventional surface coherence and appearance of introduced modernism and modernist theories to [10] harmony typical of the rationality of Enlightenment thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. the Avant-Garde in the Late 20Th Century 1
    Chapter 12. The Avant-Garde in the Late 20th Century 1 The Avant-Garde in the Late 20th Century: Modernism becomes Postmodernism A college student walks across campus in 1960. She has just left her room in the sorority house and is on her way to the art building. She is dressed for class, in carefully coordinated clothes that were all purchased from the same company: a crisp white shirt embroidered with her initials, a cardigan sweater in Kelly green wool, and a pleated skirt, also Kelly green, that reaches right to her knees. On her feet, she wears brown loafers and white socks. She carries a neatly packed bag, filled with freshly washed clothes: pants and a big work shirt for her painting class this morning; and shorts, a T-shirt and tennis shoes for her gym class later in the day. She’s walking rather rapidly, because she’s dying for a cigarette and knows that proper sorority girls don’t ever smoke unless they have a roof over their heads. She can’t wait to get into her painting class and light up. Following all the rules of the sorority is sometimes a drag, but it’s a lot better than living in the dormitory, where girls have ten o’clock curfews on weekdays and have to be in by midnight on weekends. (Of course, the guys don’t have curfews, but that’s just the way it is.) Anyway, it’s well known that most of the girls in her sorority marry well, and she can’t imagine anything she’d rather do after college.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTHONY JAMES / FABULISM FORT GANSEVOORT 5 Ninth Avenue, New York, NY, 10014 on View: Thursday May 18 – Saturday, July
    ANTHONY JAMES / FABULISM FORT GANSEVOORT 5 Ninth Avenue, New York, NY, 10014 On View: Thursday May 18 – Saturday, July 8 Opening Reception: Thursday, May 18, 6-9pm New York – May 11, 2017: Fort Gansevoort is pleased to present Fabulism, the first New York solo project in over a decade of British-born, Los Angeles-based artist Anthony James. The exhibition will stage a selection of older works mounted in dialogue with a new body of sculpture in an effort to reflect upon the dynamics of continuity and change within the artist’s practice. The exhibition title speaks to the artist’s interest in elevating ordinary materials through experimentation and transformation. Fabulism, the literary theory of magical realism— which renders the mundane fantastical—is a preoccupation of the artist. The exhibition is curated by Lauri Firstenberg in collaboration with there-there, a new Los Angeles based production company and exhibition space. James debuts his new series of Shields, rendered in steel and bronze, which are highly worked surfaces through a laborious process of painting and additive gestures of refined and subtle metal work. James’s work operates elusively, staggering between the iconic and the arbitrary, the concrete and the alchemic, the mythical and experiential. The artist reveals, "the works evoke pictorial depictions of the cosmos, alluding to notions of mysticism, ethereality, and science fiction, all the while anchored through the use of weighty, industrial materials such as metal and neon." The objects read as relics or artifacts from some liminal moment. As such, James attempts to locate beauty in the wake of insanity.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places
    NFSForm 10-900 (7-81) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Tourtellotte and Hummel Architecture>in 2. Location N_/A- not for publication city, town N/A N/A_ vicinity of state code ' county N/A code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum building(s) private X unoccupied X commercial park . structure x both work in progress X educational _ X_ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible X entertainment x religious object N/A jn process yes: restricted X government scientific X Thematic N^A_ being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation Group no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple owners (see individual inventory sheets) city, town N/A N/A vicinity of 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multiple (see individual inventory sheets) N/A N/A state Idaho 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Idaho State Historic Sites Survey has this property been determined eligible? __yes _X_ no 1972 date . federal X state county local depository for survey records Idaho State Historical Society city, town Boise state Idaho 7. Description Condition N/A Check one N/A check one N/A excellent deteriorated unaltered original site good ruins altered moved date N/A fair unexposed See Individual Inventory forms. Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The unifying theme of this nomination is the design of all structures included in it by members of the Boise-based architectural firm of John E.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ancient Greece to Byzantium
    Proceedings of the European Control Conference 2007 TuA07.4 Kos, Greece, July 2-5, 2007 Technology and Autonomous Mechanisms in the Mediterranean: From Ancient Greece to Byzantium K. P. Valavanis, G. J. Vachtsevanos, P. J. Antsaklis Abstract – The paper aims at presenting each period are then provided followed by technology and automation advances in the accomplishments in automatic control and the ancient Greek World, offering evidence that transition from the ancient Greek world to the Greco- feedback control as a discipline dates back more Roman era and the Byzantium. than twenty five centuries. II. CHRONOLOGICAL MAP OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY I. INTRODUCTION It is worth noting that there was an initial phase of The paper objective is to present historical evidence imported influences in the development of ancient of achievements in science, technology and the Greek technology that reached the Greek states from making of automation in the ancient Greek world until the East (Persia, Babylon and Mesopotamia) and th the era of Byzantium and that the main driving force practiced by the Greeks up until the 6 century B.C. It behind Greek science [16] - [18] has been curiosity and was at the time of Thales of Miletus (circa 585 B.C.), desire for knowledge followed by the study of nature. when a very significant change occurred. A new and When focusing on the discipline of feedback control, exclusively Greek activity began to dominate any James Watt’s Flyball Governor (1769) may be inherited technology, called science. In subsequent considered as one of the earliest feedback control centuries, technology itself became more productive, devices of the modern era.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    NFS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received MAY 6 19ST Inventory—Nomination Form date entered JUN | 5 [937 See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic N/A Number of contributing features: 20 Portland Thirteenth Avenue and or common Historic District Number of non-contributing features: 0 2. Location A six-block-long corridor of warehouse properties fronting on NW 13th street & number Avenue, between NW Davis Street on the south and Jl/Anot for publication NW Johnson Street on the north city, town Portland ___ J/Avicinity of Third Congressional District state Oregon code 41 county Multnomah code 051 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use JC_ district public _X _ occupied agriculture museum building(s) _ X_ private unoccupied _X — commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process yes: restricted _ government scientific X industrial N/A being considered -X _ "noyes: unrestricted transportation military name Multiple (see Continuation Sheets) street & number N/A city, town N/A vicinity of state 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multnomah County Courthouse street & number 1021 SW 4th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon 97204 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Portland Historic title Rpsnurr.p Inventory has this property been determined eligible? yes X no date federal state county _X_ local depository for survey records Portland Bureau nf P1anning 3 11?n SU 5th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon Q7?n4 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Internal Rev Enue Ser Ice ► Do Not Enter Social Security Numbers on This Form As It May Be Made Public
    l efile GRAPHIC print - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN:93491251006127 OMB No 1545-0052 I Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation Department of the Trea^un or Section 4947( a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation 2016 Internal Rev enue Ser ice ► Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. ► Information about Form 990 - PF and its instructions is at www. irs.gov/form990pf. For calendar year 2016, or tax year beginning 01 - 01-2016 , and ending 12-31-2016 Name of foundation A Employer identification number Boehm Family Foundation 55-0878373 O/ SU7AN BOFHM Number and street (or P O box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) 17 Wallacks Lane (203) 969-7490 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Stamford, CT 06902 C If exemption application is pending, check here q G Check all that apply q Initial return q Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ► El q Final return q Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach computation ► El El Address change El Name change E If private foundation status was terminated H Check typ e of org anization q Section 501(c)(3) exem p t p rivate foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ► q Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust q Other taxable private foundation I Fair market value of all assets at end J Accounting method 9 Cash q Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination of
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Technological Invention on Economic Growth – a Review of the Literature Andrew Reamer1 February 28, 2014
    THE GEORGE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY The Impacts of Technological Invention on Economic Growth – A Review of the Literature Andrew Reamer1 February 28, 2014 I. Introduction In their recently published book, The Second Machine Age, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee rely on economist Paul Krugman to explain the connection between invention and growth: Paul Krugman speaks for many, if not most, economists when he says, “Productivity isn’t everything, but in the long run it’s almost everything.” Why? Because, he explains, “A country’s ability to improve its standard of living over time depends almost entirely on its ability to raise its output per worker”—in other words, the number of hours of labor it takes to produce everything, from automobiles to zippers, that we produce. Most countries don’t have extensive mineral wealth or oil reserves, and thus can’t get rich by exporting them. So the only viable way for societies to become wealthier—to improve the standard of living available to its people—is for their companies and workers to keep getting more output from the same number of inputs, in other words more goods and services from the same number of people. Innovation is how this productivity growth happens.2 For decades, economists and economic historians have sought to improve their understanding of the role of technological invention in economic growth. As in many fields of inventive endeavor, their efforts required time to develop and mature. In the last five years, these efforts have reached a point where they are generating robust, substantive, and intellectually interesting findings, to the benefit of those interested in promoting growth-enhancing invention in the U.S.
    [Show full text]