IDG Senegal FTF ZOI Indicator Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IDG Senegal FTF ZOI Indicator Assessment Report SENEGAL Feed the Future Zone of Influence Indicator Assessment Report May 2017 Prepared for the United States Agency for International Development, USAID Contract Number AID-OAA-I-12-00042/AID-OAA-TO-14-00046. Implemented by International Development Group LLC (IDG), with data collection support from Centre de Recherche pour le Développement Humain (CRDH). Recommended Citation: International Development Group LLC, 2016, Feed the Future Senegal 2015-16 Zone of Influence Interim Assessment Report, Virginia, USA. Cover photo credit: Tamara Glazer USAID/Senegal Contact: Abdoulaye Dia Agriculture Specialist [email protected] International Development Group LLC Contact: Elly Preotle Senior Manager 1100 North Glebe Road, Ste 950, Arlington, VA 22201, USA 571.336.7972 [email protected] Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. i List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... v Background ....................................................................................................... v Interim Assessment Indicators ..................................................................... v Interim Assessment Data Sources .............................................................. vi Summary of Key Findings .............................................................................. vi 1. Background ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Feed the Future Overview .............................................................. 1 1.2 Feed the Future ZOI Profile ............................................................ 2 1.2.1 Rationale for ZOI Selection ............................................ 3 1.2.2 Demography of the ZOI .................................................. 4 1.2.3 Agriculture in the ZOI ..................................................... 5 1.3 Purpose of This Report .................................................................... 6 2. Methodologies for Obtaining Interim Values for Feed the Future Indicators ............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Data Sources ....................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Primary Data: The ZOI Interim Survey in Senegal ................................................................................. 8 Questionnaire Design ................................................................................... 10 Fieldwork ......................................................................................................... 12 Limitations of the Survey ............................................................................. 13 ZOI Interim Survey Response Rates ......................................................... 14 2.2 Measures and Reporting Conventions Used Throughout This Report ................................................................ 15 2.2.1 Standard Disaggregates .................................................. 15 2.2.2 Reporting Conventions .................................................. 17 3. ZOI Interim Survey Population .................................................................. 19 3.1 Demographics ................................................................................... 19 3.2 Living Conditions ............................................................................. 21 3.3 Education ........................................................................................... 23 4. Household Economic Status ....................................................................... 25 4.1 Daily Per Capita Expenditures ...................................................... 26 4.2 Prevalence and Depth of Poverty in the ZOI ........................... 27 4.2.1 The $1.25 Poverty Threshold ....................................... 28 4.2.2 The National Poverty Threshold ................................. 29 4.2.3 The National Extreme Poverty Threshold ................ 31 5. Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture .................................................. 34 5.1 Overview ........................................................................................... 34 5.2 Agricultural Production .................................................................. 37 5.3 Productive Resources ..................................................................... 40 5.4 Leadership in the Community ....................................................... 42 Feed the Future Senegal 2015-16 Zone of Influence Interim Indicator Assessment i 5.5 Time Use............................................................................................ 43 6. Hunger and Dietary Intake .......................................................................... 45 6.1 Household Hunger .......................................................................... 45 6.2 Dietary Intake ................................................................................... 46 6.2.1 Dietary Diversity among Women Age 15-49 Years ................................................................................... 46 6.2.2 Infant and Young Child Feeding .................................... 51 7. Nutritional Status of Women and Children ............................................ 56 7.1 Body Mass Index of Women Age 15-49 Years ......................... 56 7.2 Stunting, Wasting, and Underweight among Children Under 5 Years .................................................................................. 58 7.2.1 Stunting (Height-for-Age) .............................................. 58 7.2.2 Wasting (Weight-for-Height) ....................................... 60 7.2.3 Underweight (Weight-for-Age) .................................... 62 8. Summary and Conclusions .......................................................................... 65 References ........................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix 1. Supplementary Data and Figures .............................................................. 69 A1.1. Interim Feed the Future Indicator Estimates ............................. 69 A1.2. Poverty at the $1.90 (2011 PPP) per person per day threshold ............................................................................................ 71 Appendix 2. Methodology ................................................................................................. 72 A2.1 Sampling and Weighting ................................................................. 72 A2.2 Poverty Prevalence and Expenditure Methods ......................... 74 A2.3 Criteria for Achieving Adequacy for Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Indicators .................................... 76 Appendix 3. Feed the Future Results Framework ....................................................... 80 Appendix 4. List of 2015 ZOI Communes and Population ....................................... 81 Appendix 5. List of 2012 Truncated Baseline ZOI Communes ................................ 85 Appendix 6. Population of Individuals by Category in the Current ZOI and the Sub-ZOI, Senegal 2013 .......................................................................... 87 Feed the Future Senegal 2015-16 Zone of Influence Interim Indicator Assessment ii List of Acronyms 5DE Five Domains of Empowerment ANSD Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie BFS Bureau for Food Security BMI Body Mass Index CI Confidence Interval Collaborative Management for Sustainable Fisheries Future in COMFISH Senegal CPI Consumer Price Index CR Communautés Rurales CRDH Centre de Recherche pour le Développement Humain DEFF Design Effect DHS Demographic and Health Survey DR Districts de Recensement EA Enumeration Area EG Economic Growth ERA Education and Research in Agriculture FANTA Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project GOS Government of Senegal GPI Gender Parity Index HHS Household Hunger Scale IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute IYCF Infant and Young Child Feeding LCU Local Currency Unit LSMS Living Standards Measurement Survey M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MAD Minimum Acceptable Diet MDD-W Women’s Minimum Dietary Diversity MDG Millennium Development Goals MS Monitoring System MYS Multi-Year Strategy NLA Nutrition-Led Agriculture NRVCC Nutrient-Rich Value Chain Commodity Feed the Future Senegal 2015-16 Zone of Influence Interim Indicator Assessment iii ORS Oral Hydration Solution Peace Corps Agriculture Participating Agency Program PAPA Agreement PCE Economic Growth Project PPP Purchasing Power Parity PPS Probability Proportional to Size PSU Primary Sampling Unit RF Results Framework SD Standard Deviation SFZ Southern Forest Zone SRV Senegal River Valley SSU Secondary Sampling Units USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollar USG United States Government WDDS Women’s Dietary Diversity Score WEAI Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index ZOI Zone of Influence Feed the Future Senegal 2015-16 Zone of Influence Interim Indicator Assessment iv Executive Summary Background Feed the Future, led by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), seeks to reduce poverty
Recommended publications
  • Rapport EV 2009 Cartes Rev-Mai 2011 Mb MF__Dsdsx
    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL Un Peuple-Un But-Une Foi ---------- MINISTERE DE L’ECONOMIE ET DES FINANCES ---------- Cellule de Suivi du Programme de Lutte contre la Pauvreté (CSPLP) ---------- Projet d’Appui à la Stratégie de Réduction de la Pauvreté (PASRP) Avec l’appui de l’union européenne ENQUETE VILLAGES DE 2009 SUR L'ACCES AUX SERVICES SOCIAUX DE BASE Rapport final Dakar, Décembre 2009 SOMMAIRE I. CONTEXTE ET JUSTIFICATIONS _____________________________________________ 3 II. OBJECTIF GLOBAL DE L’ENQUETE VILLAGES __________________________________ 3 III. ORGANISATION ET METHODOLOGIE ________________________________________ 5 III.1 Rationalité ______________________________________________________________ 5 III.2 Stratégie ________________________________________________________________ 5 III.3 Budget et ressources humaines _____________________________________________ 7 III.4 Calendrier des activités ____________________________________________________ 7 III.5 Calcul des indices et classement des communautés rurales _______________________ 9 IV. Analyse des premiers résultats de l’enquête _______________________________ 10 V. ACCES ET EXISTENCE DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE BASE _________________________ 11 VI. Accès et fonctionnalité des services sociaux de base ________________________ 14 VII. Disparités régionales et accès aux services sociaux de base __________________ 16 VII.1 Disparité régionale de l’accès à un lieu de commerce ___________________________ 16 VII.2 Disparité régionale de l’accès à un point d’eau potable _________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Acte III Une Réforme, Des Questions Une Réforme, Des Questions
    N°18 - Août 2015 MAURITANIE PODOR DAGANA Gamadji Sarré Dodel Rosso Sénégal Ndiandane Richard Toll Thillé Boubakar Guédé Ndioum Village Ronkh Gaé Aéré Lao Cas Cas Ross Béthio Mbane Fanaye Ndiayène Mboumba Pendao Golléré SAINT-LOUIS Région de Madina Saldé Ndiatbé SAINT-LOUIS Pété Galoya Syer Thilogne Gandon Mpal Keur Momar Sar Région de Toucouleur MAURITANIE Tessekéré Forage SAINT-LOUIS Rao Agnam Civol Dabia Bokidiawé Sakal Région de Océan LOUGA Léona Nguène Sar Nguer Malal Gandé Mboula Labgar Oréfondé Nabbadji Civol Atlantique Niomré Région de Mbeuleukhé MATAM Pété Ouarack MATAM Kelle Yang-Yang Dodji Gueye Thieppe Bandègne KANEL LOUGA Lougré Thiolly Coki Ogo Ouolof Mbédiène Kamb Géoul Thiamène Diokoul Diawrigne Ndiagne Kanène Cayor Boulal Thiolom KEBEMER Ndiob Thiamène Djolof Ouakhokh Région de Fall Sinthiou Loro Touba Sam LOUGA Bamambé Ndande Sagata Ménina Yabal Dahra Ngandiouf Geth BarkedjiRégion de RANEROU Ndoyenne Orkadiéré Waoundé Sagatta Dioloff Mboro Darou Mbayène Darou LOUGA Khoudoss Semme Méouane Médina Pékesse Mamane Thiargny Dakhar MbadianeActe III Moudéry Taïba Pire Niakhène Thimakha Ndiaye Gourèye Koul Darou Mousty Déali Notto Gouye DiawaraBokiladji Diama Pambal TIVAOUANE de la DécentralisationRégion de Kayar Diender Mont Rolland Chérif Lô MATAM Guedj Vélingara Oudalaye Wourou Sidy Aouré Touba Région de Thiel Fandène Thiénaba Toul Région de Pout Région de DIOURBEL Région de Gassane khombole Région de Région de DAKAR DIOURBEL Keur Ngoundiane DIOURBEL LOUGA MATAM Gabou Moussa Notto Ndiayène THIES Sirah Région de Ballou Ndiass
    [Show full text]
  • Teranga Development Strategy
    TERANGA DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FEBRUARY 2014 PREPARED BY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE TDS 5 1.2 OUR PRIORITY OUTCOMES 7 1.3 OUR FOCUS AREA 8 1.4 MYTHODOLOGY 10 1.5 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE 14 2.0 OUR MINE OPERATION 15 2.1 THE SABODALA GOLD OPERATION 16 2.2 OUR FUTURE GROWTH 18 3.0 UNDERSTANDING OUR REGION 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION 21 3.2 GOVERNANCE 22 3.3 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 27 3.4 AGRICULTURE AND LIVELIHOOD 31 3.5 EDUCATION 38 3.6 ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 46 3.7 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 50 3.8 HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY 53 3.9 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE 66 3.10 SANITATION INFRASTRUCTURE 70 3.11 HOUSING 72 3.12 ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 74 4.0 OUR VISION FOR OUR ROLE IN THE REGION 79 5.0 A SPATIAL STRUCTURE TO SUPPORT REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 81 5.1 INTRODUCTION 82 5.2 THE GOLD DISTRICT CONCEPTUAL SPATIAL PLAN 87 2 6.0 OUR ACTIONS 92 6.1 INTRODUCTION 93 6.2 JOBS AND PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT 94 6.3 LAND ACQUISITION 102 6.4 PROCUREMENT 106 6.5 HEALTH, SAFETY AND SECURITY 110 6.6 MINE-RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE 116 6.7 WORKER HOUSING 119 6.8 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 121 6.9 MINE CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION 125 6.10 FINANCIAL PAYMENTS AND INVESTMENTS 129 LIST OF ACRONYMS 143 TERANGA DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 3 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE TDS As the first gold mine in Senegal, Teranga has a unique opportunity to set the industry standard for socially responsible mining in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Zone Descriptions
    Government of Senegal COMPREHENSIVE FOOD SECURITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (CFSVA) Livelihood Zone Descriptions WFP/FAO/SE-CNSA/CSE/FEWS NET Introduction The WFP, FAO, CSE (Centre de Suivi Ecologique), SE/CNSA (Commissariat National à la Sécurité Alimentaire) and FEWS NET conducted a zoning exercise with the goal of defining zones with fairly homogenous livelihoods in order to better monitor vulnerability and early warning indicators. This exercise led to the development of a Livelihood Zone Map, showing zones within which people share broadly the same pattern of livelihood and means of subsistence. These zones are characterized by the following three factors, which influence household food consumption and are integral to analyzing vulnerability: 1) Geography – natural (topography, altitude, soil, climate, vegetation, waterways, etc.) and infrastructure (roads, railroads, telecommunications, etc.) 2) Production – agricultural, agro-pastoral, pastoral, and cash crop systems, based on local labor, hunter-gatherers, etc. 3) Market access/trade – ability to trade, sell goods and services, and find employment. Key factors include demand, the effectiveness of marketing systems, and the existence of basic infrastructure. Methodology The zoning exercise consisted of three important steps: 1) Document review and compilation of secondary data to constitute a working base and triangulate information 2) Consultations with national-level contacts to draft initial livelihood zone maps and descriptions 3) Consultations with contacts during workshops in each region to revise maps and descriptions. 1. Consolidating secondary data Work with national- and regional-level contacts was facilitated by a document review and compilation of secondary data on aspects of topography, production systems/land use, land and vegetation, and population density.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Resultats Aux Examens
    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL Un Peuple - Un But - Une Foi Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation Université Cheikh Anta DIOP de Dakar OFFICE DU BACCALAUREAT B.P. 5005 - Dakar-Fann – Sénégal Tél. : (221) 338593660 - (221) 338249592 - (221) 338246581 - Fax (221) 338646739 Serveur vocal : 886281212 RESULTATS DU BACCALAUREAT SESSION 2017 Janvier 2018 Babou DIAHAM Directeur de l’Office du Baccalauréat 1 REMERCIEMENTS Le baccalauréat constitue un maillon important du système éducatif et un enjeu capital pour les candidats. Il doit faire l’objet d’une réflexion soutenue en vue d’améliorer constamment son organisation. Ainsi, dans le souci de mettre à la disposition du monde de l’Education des outils d’évaluation, l’Office du Baccalauréat a réalisé ce fascicule. Ce fascicule représente le dix-septième du genre. Certaines rubriques sont toujours enrichies avec des statistiques par type de série et par secteur et sous - secteur. De même pour mieux coller à la carte universitaire, les résultats sont présentés en cinq zones. Le fascicule n’est certes pas exhaustif mais les utilisateurs y puiseront sans nul doute des informations utiles à leur recherche. Le Classement des établissements est destiné à satisfaire une demande notamment celle de parents d'élèves. Nous tenons à témoigner notre sincère gratitude aux autorités ministérielles, rectorales, académiques et à l’ensemble des acteurs qui ont contribué à la réussite de cette session du Baccalauréat. Vos critiques et suggestions sont toujours les bienvenues et nous aident
    [Show full text]
  • SEN FRA REP2 1999.Pdf
    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL MINISTERE DE L’AGRICULTURE Projet GCP/SEN/048/NET Recensement National de l’Agriculture et Système Permanent de Statistiques Agricoles RECENSEMENT NATIONAL DE L’AGRICULTURE 1998-99 Volume 2 Répertoire des villages d’après le pré-recensement de l’agriculture 1997-98 Août 1999 ___________________________________________________________________________ ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ALIMENTATION ET L’AGRICULTURE (FAO) Sommaire Données récapitulatives par unité administrative ……………………………………….… 9 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Dakar …………………………………….. 35 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Diourbel …………………………………. 41 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Saint-Louis ………………………….….. 105 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Tambacounda …………………………... 157 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Kaolack …………………………………. 237 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Thiès ……………………………………. 347 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Louga …………………………………… 427 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Fatick …………………………………… 557 Données individuelles relatives à la région de Kolda …………………………………… 617 Carte administrative du Sénégal ………………………………………………………… 727 3 Avant-propos Ce volume 2 des publications sur le pré-recensement de l’agriculture 1997-98 est consacré à la publication d’un répertoire des villages construit à partir des données issues des opérations de collecte du pré-recensement qui ont consisté en une opération de cartographie censitaire et en une enquête sur les ménages ruraux. Le répertoire des villages publié dans ce volume 2 est simplement la liste exhaustive des villages, avec pour chaque village, les valeurs de plusieurs paramètres de taille. A titre d’exemple, l’effectif des concessions rurales, l’effectif des ménages ruraux et l’effectif des ménages ruraux agricoles sont trois variables de taille du village dont les valeurs figurent dans ce répertoire des villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Cdm-Ar-Pdd) (Version 05)
    CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM for A/R CDM project activities (CDM-AR-PDD) (VERSION 05) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. General description of the proposed A/R CDM project activity 2 SECTION B. Duration of the project activity / crediting period 19 SECTION C. Application of an approved baseline and monitoring methodology 20 SECTION D. Estimation of ex ante actual net GHG removals by sinks, leakage, and estimated amount of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks over the chosen crediting period 26 SECTION E. Monitoring plan 33 SECTION F. Environmental impacts of the proposed A/R CDM project activity 43 SECTION G. Socio-economic impacts of the proposed A/R CDM project activity 44 SECTION H. Stakeholders’ comments 45 ANNEX 1: CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROPOSED A/R CDM PROJECT ACTIVITY 50 ANNEX 2: INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING 51 ANNEX 3: BASELINE INFORMATION 51 ANNEX 4: MONITORING PLAN 51 ANNEX 5: COORDINATES OF PROJECT BOUNDARY 52 ANNEX 6: PHASES OF PROJECT´S CAMPAIGNS 78 ANNEX 7: SCHEDULE OF CINEMA-MEETINGS 81 ANNEX 8: STATEMENTS OF THE DNA 86 ANNEX 9: LETTER OF THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT REGARDING EIA 88 ANNEX 10: RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES 89 ANNEX 11: ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT PHASES 91 SECTION A. General description of the proposed A/R CDM project activity A.1. Title of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> Title: Oceanium mangrove restoration project Version of the document: 01 Date of the document: November 10 2010. A.2. Description of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> The proposed A/R CDM project activity plans to establish 1700 ha of mangrove plantations on currently degraded wetlands in the Sine Saloum and Casamance deltas, Senegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid Wula Nafaa Project Quarterly Report
    USAID WULA NAFAA PROJECT QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER – DECEMBER 2010 January 2011 This publication was produced for the United States Agency for International Development by International Resources Group (IRG). USAID WULA NAFAA PROJECT Quarterly Report October-December 2010 Contract No. 685-C-00-08-00063-00 Notice: The points of view expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or of the Government of the USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................... II 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 1 2. AGRICULTURE COMPONENT .............................................................. 3 2.1. Targeted results and planned activities .............................................................................. 3 2.2. Progress achieved .................................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Constraints, opportunities, and priorities for next quarter ....................................... 17 3. BIODIVERSITY AND SUSTAINABLE NRM COMPONENT ............ 18 3.1. Targeted results and planned activities ........................................................................... 18 3.2. Progress achieved ................................................................................................................. 20 3.3. Constraints, opportunities, and priorities for next quarter ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Spatial Models Applied to Malaria Epidemiology
    Bayesian spatial models applied to malaria epidemiology INAUGURALDISSERTATION zur Erlangung der W¨urdeeines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Universit¨atBasel von Federica Giardina aus Pescara, Italien Basel, December 2015 Original document stored on the publication server of the University of Basel edoc.unibas.ch Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨atauf Antrag von Prof. Dr. M. Tanner, P.D. Dr. P. Vounatsou, and Prof. Dr. A. Biggeri. Basel, den 10 December 2013 Prof. Dr. J¨orgSchibler Dekan Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house. (Henri Poincar´e) iv Summary Malaria is a mosquito-borne infectious disease caused by parasitic protozoans of the genus Plasmodium and transmitted to humans via the bites of infected female Anopheles mos- quitoes. Although progress has been seen in the last decade in the fight against the disease, malaria remains one of the major cause of morbidity and mortality in large areas of the developing world, especially sub-Saharan Africa. The main victims are children under five years of age. The observed reductions are going hand in hand with impressive increases in international funding for malaria prevention, control, and elimination, which have led to tremendous expansion in implementing national malaria control programs (NMCPs). Common interventions include indoor residual spraying (IRS), the use of insecticide treated nets (ITN) and environmental measures such as larval control. Specific targets have been set during the last decade. The Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 6 aims to halve malaria incidence by 2015 as compared to 1990 and to achieve universal ITN coverage and treatment with appropriate antimalarial drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Survey: Hygiene and Sanitation Behavior As Well As Willingness to Pay in Rural Senegal
    Swiss TPH | Hygiene and Sanitation Survey, Senegal – Final report – Final version_15.12.2015 Swiss Center for International Health Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank Household survey: hygiene and sanitation behavior as well as willingness to pay in rural Senegal Support to the Direction de l'Assainissement Final report Swiss TPH ISED Consultants Lise Beck Mayassine Diongue Sylvain Faye Peter Steinmann Cheikh Fall Tidiane Ndoye Ibrahima Sy Adama Faye Alioune Touré Martin Bratschi Anta Tal Dia Kaspar Wyss Basel, 15 December 2015 Page 1 / 125 Swiss TPH | Hygiene and Sanitation Survey, Senegal – Final report – Final version_15.12.2015 Contacts Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Institut de Santé et Développement (ISED) Socinstrasse 57 Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar (UCAD) P.O. Box BP 16390 4002 Basel Dakar-Fann Switzerland Senegal Kaspar Wyss Anta Tal Dia Head of Systems Support Unit Director ISED Swiss Center for International Health (SCIH) Tel: +221 33 824 98 78 T: +41 61 284 81 40 Fax: +221 33 825 36 48 F: +41 61 284 81 03 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.scih.ch / www.swisstph.ch Website: http://www.ised.sn/ Funding This study was undertaken on behalf of the Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), a multi- donor partnership administered by the World Bank Group, which aims to support poor populations in obtaining affordable, safe and sustainable access to water and sanitation services. Disclaimer The views and ideas expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply or reflect the opinion of the Institute, WSP or any other institution involved in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth Project
    ECONOMIC GROWTH PROJECT CONTRACT 685-I-00-06-00005-00 TA SK ORDER 5 FY 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OCTO BER 1, 2012 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 October 2013 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of International Resources Group (IRG) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. ECONOMIC GROWTH PROJECT CONTRACT 685-I-00-06-00005-00 TASK ORDER 5 FY 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2012 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 October 2013 Submitted by International Resources Group (IRG) DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government Economic Growth Project FY 2013 Annual Report i CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Highlights FY2013 ................................................................................................................................................. 3 FY2013 Feed the Future Indicator Overview ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Z I G U I N C H
    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL Un Peuple – Un But – Une Foi Z ------------------ MINISTERE DE L’ECONOMIE, DES FINANCES ET DU PLAN ------------------ I AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE LA DEMOGRAPHIE G ------------------ Service Régional de la Statistique et de la Démographie de Ziguinchor U I N C H O R 2 0 SITUATION ECONOMIQUE ET SOCIALE REGIONALE 1 2013 3 Avril 2015 AVANT PROPOS Dans la réalisation de ses missions de coordination technique des activités du système statistique national et de production et diffusion des données statistiques, l’ANSD réalise régulièrement des publications parmi lesquelles la « Situation Economique et Sociale du Sénégal » et les « Situations Economiques et Sociales » régionales. Les Situations Economiques et Sociales (SES) régionales, élaborées chaque année par les Services Régionaux de la Statistique et de la Démographie (SRSD) pour l’année précédente, figurent en bonne place parmi les produits phares de l’ANSD. Elles constituent d’importants instruments de planification du développement économique et social régional et des outils d’aide à la décision aux niveaux régional et local. L’exercice d’analyse de la conjoncture qu’elles constituent n’a évidemment pas pour ambition l’exhaustivité, mais la présentation de manière synthétique des modes de fonctionnement essentiels de l’économie régionale. Chaque SES régionale essaie d’embrasser la quasi-totalité des secteurs de l’activité économique et sociale. Elle met surtout en relief l’information quantitative et tente, par des analyses sommaires, de décrire la situation de chaque secteur d’activité dans la région concernée. De 2006 à 2013, la publication des SES a été précédée d’une validation régionale au cours de réunions des Comités Régionaux de Développement (CRD).
    [Show full text]