DOCSLIB.ORG

Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited All Pre-Existing Rights Reserved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited All Pre-Existing Rights Reserved Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited TRITON KNOLL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Environmental Statement Volume 1 Chapter 4: Site Selection and Alternatives April 2015, Revision A Document Reference: 6.2.1.4 Pursuant to: APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Triton Knoll Electrical System Environmental Statement - Volume 1 Copyright © 2015 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited All pre-existing rights reserved. Triton Knoll Electrical System Liability Copyright © 2014 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm In the preparation of this document, Triton Knoll Offshore Environmental Statement Limited Wind Farm Limited (TKOWFL), a joint venture between RWE InnogyAll preUK-existing (RWE) rights and reserved.Statkraft UK, and subconsultants Volume 1: Chapter 4 – Site Selection and Alternatives working on behalf of TKOWFL, have made reasonable efforts to ensure that the content is accurate, up to date and complete for the purpose for which it was prepared. Neither April 2015 TKOWFL nor their subcontractors make any warranty as to Copyright © 2014 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm the accuracy or completeness of material supplied. Other thanLimited any liability on TKOWFL or their subcontractors detailed in theAll precontracts-existing between rights reserved. the parties for this work neither TKOWFL or their subcontractors shall have any liability for Drafted By: RWE any loss, damage, injury, claim, expense, cost or other consequence arising as a result of use or reliance upon any Approved By: Kim Gauld-Clark information contained in or omitted from this document. Date of Approval April 2015 Any persons intending to use this document should satisfy themselves as to its applicability for their intended purpose. Revision 2 Where appropriate, the user of this document has the obligation to employ safe working practices for any activities referred to and to adopt specific practices appropriate to local conditions. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Trigonos Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited have been awarded Great Western Way EU TEN-E funding to support the development of the Triton Swindon Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Electrical System located in both UK Territorial waters and the UK’s Exclusive Economic Zone. The Wiltshire, SN5 8ZT funding which is to be matched will support a number of surveys, engineering reports, and environmental impact assessment studies for the Triton Knoll Electrical System. The T +44 (0)845 720 090 studies will form part of the formal documentation that will F +44 (0)845 720 050 accompany the Development Consent Order which will be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate. The sum of €1,159,559 I www.rweinnogy.com has been granted and the process to reclaim this funding is ongoing. www.rweinnogy.com/tritonknoll [email protected] ii Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Triton Knoll Electrical System Environmental Statement - Volume 1 Table of Contents 4 SITE SELECTION AND ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................ 4-1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Legislation and Policy Context ............................................................................................. 4-2 Site Selection and Alternatives Process .............................................................................. 4-2 Transmission Technology .................................................................................................... 4-3 Interface Selection Assessment ........................................................................................... 4-4 Subsequent changes to ISA assumptions ......................................................................... 4-13 Site Selection Assessment................................................................................................. 4-15 iii Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Triton Knoll Electrical System Environmental Statement - Volume 1 1 4 SITE SELECTION AND ALTERNATIVES The location and nature of the Unlicensed Works at the existing National Grid Bicker Fen Substation. Introduction 4.3 The various components above collectively comprise the TKES. TKOWFL has undertaken extensive consultation with both statutory and non-statutory consultees on 4.1 This Chapter of the Environmental Statement (ES) has been prepared by Triton Knoll many aspects of the scheme as part of its consideration of alternatives. That Offshore Wind Farm Limited (TKOWFL) to set out the main alternatives considered consultation has provided important information and insight into the views and during the development of the Triton Knoll Electrical System (TKES). These concerns of statutory consultees and the public. However, given the engineering alternatives primarily relate to the locational choice for various components of the constraints of the electrical system TKOWFL has focussed its consultation on those TKES. However, alternatives were also considered with respect to the type of elements of the electrical works (such as the siting of the IEC and substation and technology that should be used. The process of the consideration of alternatives for micrositing of the onshore cable route) where those being consulted could genuinely Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm comprised two key phases: influence the final proposals. 1) The Interface Selection Assessment, being a process to decide where the TKES 4.4 Consultation was carried out on the shortlist of substation and IEC options that had should connect into the existing high voltage electricity transmission network been identified as feasible through detailed analysis, rather than an extensive longlist (known as the national grid); and of options which had not yet been filtered and therefore may not have been suitable. 2) The Site Selection process, which subsequently identified where all the elements This approach was taken to ensure statutory consultees and the public could influence of the Electrical System should be located and also included the selection of the the decisions being taken on genuine alternatives. Consultation undertaken with electrical technology that should be used. respect to alternatives is set out in each relevant section of this Chapter. TKOWFL and National Grid took the decision not to consult on the selection of the Onshore Interface 4.2 The two-stage process set out above commenced in 2009 with the acceptance by Point because, once appraised for technical feasibility, the process of evaluating the TKOWFL of a connection into the high voltage transmission network that is owned and identified options involved using high-level principles to primarily differentiate cost and operated by National Grid. Over a subsequent period extending from 2009 until 2014 high level environmental impact. Similarly, the selection of the landfall was principally TKOWFL has continued to evaluate and refine the options available to determine: driven by high level environmental issues and engineering and commercial constraints dictated by the practicalities of construction at the landfall, including the potential A suitable offshore cable route and cable landfall (including accommodation of impact of landfall location on offshore and onshore cable routing. Transition Joint Bays at the landfall); 4.5 Extensive detail on the alternatives process undertaken from 2009 to 2014 is contained A suitable location for an Intermediate Electrical Compound (IEC) approximately in four key documents: midway along the entire offshore and onshore cable route; The ‘Interface Selection Assessment Report’ and its appendix the ‘Interface A suitable onshore cable route from the landfall to the Onshore Interface Point, Selection Report’ (Application Document 8.18); including connection via the IEC and the Triton Knoll substation; The ‘Site Selection and Design Report’ and its appendix the ‘Alternatives A suitable location for a new Triton Knoll substation required to increase the Consultation Report’ (Application Document 8.17 and Appendix B of that voltage of the power exported by the offshore wind farm to the voltage of the 400 document). kilovolt (kV) transmission system; and 1 “Unlicensed works” are electrical works needed to connect Triton Knoll to the National Grid substation at Bicker Fen that National Grid is not required pursuant to its transmission licence to carry out itself. 4-1 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Triton Knoll Electrical System Environmental Statement - Volume 1 4.6 This Chapter meets the requirements of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental 4.12 Furthermore Transmission Licence holders, being National Grid and the future OFTO, Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009, as set out in the next section. are bound by section 9 of the Electricity Act which requires them: Legislation and Policy Context ‘(a) to develop and maintain an efficient, co-ordinated and economical system of electricity transmission; and 4.7 TKOWFL has formally provided notification to the Secretary of State under Regulation (b) to facilitate competition in the supply and generation of electricity.’ 6(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations 2009, that it proposes to provide an Environmental 4.13 The above obligations on Licence holders generally and Transmission Licence holders Statement in respect of the proposed development. Therefore, in accordance with specifically, apply regardless of the consenting regime ultimately entered into or the Regulation 4(2)(a) of the EIA Regulations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report Are Commission-Free
    Table of Contents 1 Letter to Our Shareholders 4 Financial Highlights 6 Our Businesses Midstream Chemicals Refining Marketing and Specialties 7 Our Value Chain 8 Our Strategy Operating Excellence Growth Returns Distributions High-Performing Organization 28 Board of Directors 30 Executive Leadership Team 31 Non-GAAP Reconciliations 32 Form 10-K | ON THE COVER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS Lake Charles Refinery WESTLAKE, LA In 2019, Lake Charles Manufacturing Complex achieved a sustained safety record of more than 55 months, equivalent to 7.5 million safe work hours. 2019 PHILLIPS 66 ANNUAL REPORT 1 To Our Shareholders We have the right strategy in place to create shareholder value, and our employees are executing it well. Phillips 66 achieved 34% total shareholder return during 2019, which exceeded our peer group average and the S&P 100. In 2019, we delivered earnings of $3.1 billion and earnings per share of $6.77. Adjusted earnings were $3.7 billion or $8.05 per share. During the year, we generated $4.8 billion of operating cash flow. We reinvested $3.9 billionback into the business and returned $3.2 billion of capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We increased our quarterly dividend 12.5% and announced a $3 billion increase to our share repurchase program. Since our formation, we have returned $26 billion to shareholders through dividends, share repurchases and exchanges, reducing our initial shares outstanding by 33%. Operating excellence is our No. 1 priority and core to everything we do. Our goal is zero incidents, zero accidents and zero injuries. We believe this is attainable, and we strive for it daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2020/21 to 2024/25
    www.eastriding.gov.uk www.eastriding.gov.uk ff YouYouTubeTube East Riding Local Plan 2012 - 2029 Housing Land Supply Position Statement For the period 2020/21 to 2024/25 December 2020 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 National Policy .................................................................................................................. 1 Performance ...................................................................................................................... 3 Residual housing requirement ......................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 7 Developing the Methodology ........................................................................................... 7 Covid-19 ............................................................................................................................. 8 Calculating the Potential Capacity of Sites .................................................................... 9 Pre-build lead-in times ................................................................................................... 10 Build rates for large sites ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fact Book 2 Our Businesses Our Strategy Midstream Chemicals Refining Marketing and Specialties Energy Research & Innovation Global Asset Map General Information
    Cover Photo: Taft Storage Facility at Gray Oak Pipeline TAFT, TX Contents 3 4 5 OUR BUSINESSES OUR STRATEGY MIDSTREAM Ferndale Ferndale Rail Terminal* Renton North Spokane Tacoma (MT) Yellowstone Cut Bank Moses Lake Thompson 17Falls Rail 24 14 Spokane Terminal Palermo* UROPE DLE EA Portland D Great Falls E I ST Portland (MT) Missoula Rail Terminal M Yello Glacier Sacagawea* Missoula wsto Helena Roundup Keene CDP* ne Billings Crude* Bozeman Billings Billings Humber SPCo & S-Chem ooth Sheridan* Semino Bakk Beart en Bayway MiRO CHEMICALS REFINING * MARKETING AND SPECIALTIES Bighorn e* Linden* Q-Chem I & II Casper* Tremley Pt. (MT)* * Po Rock Springs wd Bayway Rail eminoe er Ri Terminal* S Harbor Red Line Oil North Salt Lake Pioneer ve Des Moines s r Sacramento Rockies Expr Hartford Lincoln ess Line 20 ess Richmond (MT) Rockies Expr San Francisco Denver Borg Conway Kansas City* Po 0 Rockies Expres to Wichita wd Paola er-Den Gold Line* Wood River er Riv Wichita N.* Products* HeartlandPaola* Blue Line 0 Wichita S.* E. St. ver Jeerson City* Junction er Louis* Southern Hills* m Cherokee North* r*Hartford* Line 30 re Line 40 ol Standish* La Junta * h Ponca City* Explo his Ponca City ld Line C Crude* Go 0 Los Angeles Medford* eeMount Vernon* ok t Los Angeles Borger CherEas Torrance Cherokee Colton Borger to Amarillo* Blue LineSouth* Glenpool* Ponca Selmer Line O* * CushPo* Albuquerque* K PL Sk AC ATA Line* elly ST Cushing City SA Oklahoma City* Amarillo* -Belvieu Los Angeles AL Borger Oklahoma Crude* * Explor Wichita Falls* Lubbock* Savannah North
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Prospects for Northwest European Refining
    LONG-TERM PROSPECTS FOR NORTHWEST EUROPEAN REFINING ASYMMETRIC CHANGE: A LOOMING GOVERNMENT DILEMMA? ROBBERT VAN DEN BERGH MICHIEL NIVARD MAURITS KREIJKES CIEP PAPER 2016 | 01 CIEP is affiliated to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. CIEP acts as an independent forum for governments, non-governmental organizations, the private sector, media, politicians and all others interested in changes and developments in the energy sector. CIEP organizes lectures, seminars, conferences and roundtable discussions. In addition, CIEP members of staff lecture in a variety of courses and training programmes. CIEP’s research, training and activities focus on two themes: • European energy market developments and policy-making; • Geopolitics of energy policy-making and energy markets CIEP is endorsed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, BP Europe SE- BP Nederland, Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. ('Rabobank'), Delta N.V., ENGIE Energie Nederland N.V., ENGIE E&P Nederland B.V., Eneco Holding N.V., EBN B.V., Essent N.V., Esso Nederland B.V., GasTerra B.V., N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie, Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland B.V., ING Commercial Banking, Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., N.V. NUON Energy, TenneT TSO B.V., Oranje-Nassau Energie B.V., Havenbedrijf Rotterdam N.V., Shell Nederland B.V., TAQA Energy B.V.,Total E&P Nederland B.V., Koninklijke Vopak N.V. and Wintershall Nederland B.V. CIEP Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Income Statement
    CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT Millions of Dollars 2011 2012 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD Revenues and Other Income Sales and other operating revenues* 56,530 65,627 62,784 59,872 244,813 56,132 56,132 Equity in earnings of affiliates 1,017 1,160 1,298 602 4,077 1,220 1,220 Gain on dispositions 616 78 (480) 1,793 2,007 942 942 Other income 84 96 27 122 329 60 60 Total Revenues and Other Income 58,247 66,961 63,629 62,389 251,226 58,354 58,354 Costs and Expenses Purchased crude oil, natural gas and products 42,376 50,133 47,597 45,761 185,867 41,889 41,889 Production and operating expenses 2,628 2,606 2,768 2,768 10,770 2,696 2,696 Selling, general and administrative expenses 499 514 466 599 2,078 685 685 Exploration expenses 176 264 266 360 1,066 679 679 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 2,070 2,075 1,870 1,919 7,934 1,838 1,838 Impairments - 2 486 304 792 259 259 Taxes other than income taxes* 4,364 4,830 4,579 4,534 18,307 4,521 4,521 Accretion on discounted liabilities 112 115 114 114 455 114 114 Interest and debt expense 262 247 235 228 972 209 209 Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses (36) (17) 68 (31) (16) (11) (11) Total Costs and Expenses 52,451 60,769 58,449 56,556 228,225 52,879 52,879 Income before income taxes 5,796 6,192 5,180 5,833 23,001 5,475 5,475 Provision for income taxes 2,754 2,773 2,549 2,423 10,499 2,520 2,520 Net Income 3,042 3,419 2,631 3,410 12,502 2,955 2,955 Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (14) (17) (15) (20) (66) (18) (18) Net
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..……
    Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..…… Southern North Sea candidate Special Area of Conservation (SNS cSAC): Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Date: May 2018 Document No: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Rev: 03 CONFIDENTIAL SNS cSAC Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Document Number: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Rev 01 Company: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Asset: Whole Asset Farm Project: Whole Wind Farm Sub Project/Package: Document Title or Southern North Sea candidate Special Area of Conservation: Report to Inform Description: Appropriate Assessment 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Document Number: Contractor Ref No: The document Originator shall complete this Cover Sheet and may give guidance below on any actions required by the recipient(s). The document Checker and Approver must not be the same person. The Document Author and Approver must not be the same person. The Approver must not be less senior than the Author. This document and any information therein are confidential property of Triton Knoll and without infringement neither the whole nor any extract may be disclosed, loaned, copied or used for manufacturing, provision of services or other purposes whatsoever without prior written consent of the Triton Knoll, and no liability is accepted for loss or damage from any cause whatsoever from the use of the document. Triton Knoll retains the right to alter the document at any time unless a written statement to the contrary has been appended 03 24/04/2018 Issued for information to NE - Sally Kazer Tim Golding Penny Pickett Updated following BEIS comments (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) 02 18/05/18 Issued for information to NE - Sally Kazer Tim Golding Melissa Read Updated following NE comments (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) 01 19/02/2018 Issued for information to BEIS & NE Sophie Cousens Tim Golding Penny Pickett (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on Co2 Transport Pipeline Network Design for Humber Region in the Uk
    CASE STUDY ON CO2 TRANSPORT PIPELINE NETWORK DESIGN FOR HUMBER REGION IN THE UK Tihomir Lazica, Eni Okoa,b and Meihong Wanga,b,* aProcess Systems Engineering Group, School of Engineering, Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK bSchool of Engineering, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, UK *Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1482 466688. E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT Reliable, safe and economic CO2 transport from CO2 capture points to long term storage/enhanced oil recovery (EOR) sites is critical for commercial deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. Pipeline transportation of CO2 is considered most feasible. However, in CCS applications there is concern about associated impurities and huge volumes of high pressure CO2 transported over distances likely to be densely populated areas. On this basis, there is limited experience for design and economic assessment of CO2 pipeline. The Humber region in the UK is a likely site for building CO2 pipelines in the future due to large CO2 emissions in the region and its close access to depleted gas fields and saline aquifers beneath the North Sea. In this paper, various issues to be considered in CO2 pipeline design for CCS applications are discussed. Also, different techno- economic correlations for CO2 pipelines are assessed using the Humber region as case study. Levelized cost of CO2 pipelines calculated for the region range from 0.14 to 0.75 GBP per tonne of CO2. This is a preliminary study and is useful for obtaining quick techno-economic assessment of CO2
    [Show full text]
  • The Low Carbon Energy & Industry Investment Opportunity
    Greater Lincolnshire UK The Low Carbon Energy & Industry Investment Opportunity Greater Lincolnshire UK The Low Carbon Energy & Industry Investment Opportunity 03 Business Location Guide Contents Contents Contents 03 The Low Carbon Investment Opportunity 04 The UK Low Carbon Market Opportunity 06 The Low Carbon Industrial Investment Opportunity 08 The Circular Economy Investment Opportunity 10 The Offshore Renewable Energy Investment Opportunity 12 Low Carbon & Related Industry Clusters 14 Low Carbon Knowledge, Research & Technologies 16 Workforce, Education & Skills for Low Carbon Sectors 18 Industrial Sites & Property Solutions 26 Humber Freeport Sites & Benefits28 Ports & Logistics Infrastructure 30 Fast UK & Global Market Access 32 Greater Lincolnshire’s Location & Connectivity 34 UK Market Access 35 Support for Your Low Carbon Sector Business Investment 36 Greater Lincolnshire UK The Low Carbon Energy & Industry Investment Opportunity 04 Greater Lincolnshire UK The Low Carbon Energy & Industry Investment Opportunity 05 Business Location Guide Business Location Guide Growth opportunities aligned with Greater ambitious UK sustainability goals Lincolnshire UK: UK-leading industry clusters The Low Carbon in Low Carbon energy and industrial sectors Investment Building on established strengths in energy generation, energy-intensive industries, and port logistics, including within the Humber Energy Advanced Low Carbon research, Estuary, the area is home to the UK’s most Opportunity ambitious Industrial Decarbonisation project, a innovation
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to New Values (Information Received As at End of 2010 - Date of Latest Updates Shown for Each Network.)
    G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to new Values (Information received as at End of 2010 - Date of latest updates shown for each network.) DNO [Western Power Distribution - South West Area] total responses as at 05/01/11 User Data Entry Under Frequency Over Frequency Generator Generator Generator Changes Generator Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Agreed to capacity capacity capacity changes Site name Genset implemented capacity unable Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency Comments changes (Y/N) installed agreed to implemented (Y/N) to change (MW) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (MW) change (MW) (MW) Scottish and Southern Energy, Cantelo Nurseries, Bradon Farm, Isle Abbots, Taunton, Somerset Gas Y Y 9.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 47.00 50.50 Following Settings have been applied: 47.5Hz 20s, 47Hz 0.5s, 52Hz 0.5s Bears Down Wind Farm Ltd, Bears Down Wind Farm, St Mawgan, Newquay, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y N 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 47.00 50.50 Contact made. Awaiting info. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz 0.5s) - British Gas Transco, Severn Road, Avonmouth, Bristol Gas Y Y 5.5 5.5 5.5 0.0 47.00 50.50 complete 23/11/10 Cold Northcott Wind Farm Ltd, Cold Northcott, Launceston, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y Y 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 47.00 50.50 Changes completed. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz Connon Bridge Energy Ltd, Landfill Site, East Taphouse, Liskeard, Cornwall 0.5s).Abdul Sattar confirmed complete by email 19/11/10.
    [Show full text]
  • Lantern Slides Illustrating Zoology, Botany, Geology, Astronomy
    CATALOGUES ISSUED! A—Microscope Slides. B—Microscopes and Accessories. C—Collecting Apparatus D—Models, Specimens and Diagrams— Botanical, Zoological, Geological. E—Lantfrn Slides (Chiefly Natural History). F—Optical Lanterns and Accessories. S—Chemicals, Stains and Reagents. T—Physical and Chemical Apparatus (Id Preparation). U—Photographic Apparatus and Materials. FLATTERS & GARNETT Ltd. 309 OXFORD ROAD - MANCHESTER Fourth Edition November, 1924 This Catalogue cancels all previous issues LANTERN SLIDES illustrating Zoology Birds, Insects and Plants Botany in Nature Geology Plant Associations Astronomy Protective Resemblance Textile Fibres Pond Life and Sea and Shore Life Machinery Prepared by FLATTERS k GARNETT, LTD Telephone : 309 Oxford Road CITY 6533 {opposite the University) Telegrams : ” “ Slides, Manchester MANCHESTER Hours of Business: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays 1 o’clock Other times by appointment CATALOGUE “E” 1924. Cancelling all Previous Issues Note to Fourth Edition. In presenting this New Edition we wish to point out to our clients that our entire collection of Negatives has been re-arranged and we have removed from the Catalogue such slides as appeared to be redundant, and also those for which there is little demand. Several new Sections have been added, and, in many cases, old photographs have been replaced by better ones. STOCK SLIDES. Although we hold large stocks of plain slides it frequently happens during the busy Season that particular slides desired have to be made after receipt of the order. Good notice should, therefore, be given. TONED SLIDES.—Most stock slides may be had toned an artistic shade of brown at an extra cost of 6d.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosion at the Conoco Humber Refinery – 16Th April 2001
    SYMPOSIUM SERIES NO. 151 # 2006 Crown Copyright EXPLOSION AT THE CONOCO HUMBER REFINERY – 16TH APRIL 2001 Jonathan Carter, Peter Dawson and Robert Nixon Health and Safety Executive, Hazardous Installations Directorate # Crown Copyright 2006. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland An explosion and fire occurred at the Conoco Humber Refinery on 16th April 2001, following the catastrophic failure of a 600 overhead pipe from a de-ethaniser column on the Saturate Gas Plant. Investigation revealed that the failure of the pipe was due to internal corrosion that had not been identified by the refinery pipework inspection regime. The paper describes the event and the emergency response. It also examines the immediate cause of the event, and how failures of the management of pipework inspection and management of change failed to prevent the accident occurring. The paper concludes with the lessons that can be learned from this event. THE REFINERY The Humber Refinery is located on the south bank of the estuary of the River Humber on the east coast of England, approximately 1.5 km north-west of the town of Immingham and 0.5 km east of the village of Killingholme. In 2001 Conoco Ltd owned the refinery. In August 2002 Conoco merged to form ConocoPhillips Ltd., the current owners of the refinery. The refinery was constructed between 1966 and 1969 and commissioned in 1970. The current capacity of the refinery is about 225,00 US barrels per day of crude oil, or about 11.4 million tonne per year.
    [Show full text]