German Cyber Security Policy: Focus and Approach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

German Cyber Security Policy: Focus and Approach German Cyber Security Policy: Focus and Approach Oliver Schmidt-Voss Student number: 1236148 Word count: 15221 10 June 2018 Master Thesis Crisis and Security Management Thesis supervisor: Dr. Myriam Benraad Second reader: Dr. Ernst Dijxhoorn Leiden University Faculty of Governance and Global Affair 1 Acknowledgements In memory of my beloved father. With deepest gratitude, I would like to thank dr. Myriam Benraad and dr. Joey Mathys for their unconditional support. I would like to acknowledge Mr. Sergei Boeke for introducing me to the field of cyber security and sparking my fascination for a topic I wish to engage with in my future path. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 Relevance ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Research Question ..................................................................................................................... 6 Aim .................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Cyber Security & Cyber Threats ..................................................................................... 7 Malware ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Hackers ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Complexity ............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Securitizing the Cyber Domain ..................................................................................... 12 Cyber Security in Germany ............................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Cyber Security Policy ....................................................................................................... 15 Whole of Government and Public-Private Partnerships ...................................................... 15 Cyber Defense ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Section Summary ................................................................................................................................... 17 3. Research Design & Methodology .......................................................................... 18 3.1 Single case study ................................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Document analysis ............................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Interviews ............................................................................................................................ 20 Email questionnaire ............................................................................................................................. 20 Expert interviews .................................................................................................................................. 20 4. Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 21 Preventative Measures & Civilian Agencies .................................................................... 22 Protection and Resilience .................................................................................................................. 22 Economy .................................................................................................................................................... 24 Private Sector .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Incident response .................................................................................................................................. 27 Section summary ................................................................................................................................... 29 Active Cyber Defense & Security Agencies ...................................................................... 30 Law enforcement & Security Agencies ........................................................................................ 30 Hacking Back ........................................................................................................................................... 35 Bundeswehr ............................................................................................................................................. 38 5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 39 6. Further Research ....................................................................................................... 40 References ........................................................................................................................ 41 3 Abbreviations AA Federal Foreign Office BBK Federal Office for Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance BfV Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution BKA Federal Crime Police Office BMI Federal Ministry of Interior BMVg Federal Ministry of Defense BMWi Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy BND Federal Intelligence Service BRH Federal Court of Auditors BSI Federal Office of Information Security Cyber-AZ National Cyber Defense Center Cyber-SR National Cyber Security Council MAD Military Counter-Intelligence Service ZITIs Zentrale für Informationstechnik im Sicherheitsbereich 4 1. Introduction The German government is exposed to cyber attacks on the private sector, the economy, and public administration on a daily basis (BSI, 2017: 7). According to the Federal Ministry of Information Security (Bundesamt für die Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, abbr. BSI) the possibilities to conduct cyber attacks are evolving continuously. With the growing digitalization of society, the economy and government institutions, there is also a congruent development of the attack methods and mediums. The Internet as platform to conduct cyber attacks facilitates the anonymity and impunity of perpetrators. Cyber attacks can be mounted with limited resources, simply a computer and an Internet connection is necessary. Instructions on how to administer these attacks can be found online on the darkweb (Zedler, 2016: 2). The increasing necessity to address the cyber threat situation in Germany is also thematized in the media like the hacking of the government network in February 2018 and the Bundestag in May 2015 (Beuth et al., 2015) or the disruption of the Internet for 1.25 million users in November 2016 (Baumgärtner et al.: 2017, November 24). With these incidents cyber security has gained increasing attention in Germany. The increasing amount of devices connected to the Internet is creating what has been described as the Internet of Things. A new source of danger has developed for cyber security. The devices are easily targetable as in the production process as well as in the decision to purchase consideration for IT-security do not play a sufficient role (BSI, 2017: 23). The failure or disruptions of industrial control systems - particularly in the critical infrastructure sector - can have grave physical impact leading in the form of electricity breakdown or production processes. Furthermore, a recent phenomenon has been cyber-espionage of government institutions with the purpose to leak the acquired information in order to manipulate the democratic process. The reputation of a candidate is hampered influencing public opinion (BSI, 2017: 74-75). In recent years several developments have taken place in regard to Germany’s cyber security policy. In 2015 the IT-Security Law was passed aiming to establish protection for critical infrastructure. The same year the German government announced the development of a cyber command within the armed forces (BMVg, 2015). In November 2016 a new cyber security strategy was published (BMI, 2016), a document much more elaborative and broader in scope than the previous strategy (BMI, 2011). Furthermore, in the course of 2017 a political debate ensued on the potential use of offensive cyber capabilities as part of Germany cyber security policy (Reinhold & Schultz, 2017). The study thereby aims to examine how Germany is dealing with the cyber threat landscape it faces and how these recent developments figure into Germany’s cyber security policy. 5 Relevance The study has academic relevance as to date there has not been an extensive study on Germany’s cyber security strategy of 2016. Furthermore, while previous studies have dealt with Germany’s cyber security policy (Kullik, 2014; Zedler, 2016; Steller, 2017) these have not focused on the institutional structures but have not examined how
Recommended publications
  • Fairness and Justice in Natural Resource Politics
    Fairness and Justice in Natural Resource Politics As demand for natural resources increases due to the rise in world population and living standards, conflicts over their access and control are becoming more prevalent. This book critically assesses different approaches to and conceptualizations of resource fairness and justice and applies them to the analysis of resource conflicts. Approaches addressed include cosmopolitan liberalism, political economy and political ecology. These are applied at various scales (local, national, international) and to initiatives and instruments in public and private resource governance, such as corporate social responsibility instruments, certification schemes, international law and commodity markets. In doing so, the contributions contrast existing approaches to fairness and justice and extend them by taking into account the interplay between political scales, regions, resources and power structures in ‘glo- calized’ resource politics. Various case studies are included concerning agriculture, agrofuels, land grab- bing, water resources, mining and biodiversity. The volume adds to the academic and policy debate by bringing together a variety of disciplines and perspectives in order to advance both a research and policy agenda that puts notions of resource fairness and justice centre- stage. Melanie Pichler is a Post-doctoral Researcher and Lecturer at the Institute of Social Ecology, Alpen- Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria and an Associate of the Inter- national Political Ecology Research Group at the University of Vienna. Cornelia Staritz is Senior Researcher at the Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), Austria and Research Associate at Policy Research in International Services and Manufacturing (PRISM), University of Cape Town, South Africa. Karin Küblböck is Senior Researcher at the Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), Austria and Lecturer in Development Economics at the Univer- sity of Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Kleine Anfrage Des Abgeordneten Niema Movassat, Dr. André Hahn, Doris Achelwilm, Weiterer Abgeordneter Und Der Fraktion DIE LINKE
    Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, 11055 Berlin Sabine Weiss Parlamentarische Staatssekretärin Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages - ParlamentsParlamentssekretariatsekretariat - HAUSANSCHRIFT Friedrichstraße 108, 10117 Berlin 11011 Berlin POSTANSCHRIFT 11055 Berlin TEL +49 (0)30 18441-107018441-1070 FAX +49 (0)30 18441-107418441-1074 E-MAILE-MAIL [email protected] Berlin, 13. April 2021 Kleine Anfrage des Abgeordneten Niema Movassat, Dr. André Hahn, Doris Achelwilm, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. -Drs. 19/28102 Sehr geehrter Herr Bundestagspräsident, namens der Bundesregierung beantworte ich die Kleine Anfrage wie folgt: Vorbemerkung der Fragesteller: Gerade in der Drogen- und Suchtpolitik ist es nach Ansicht der LINKEN wichtig, weg von einer ideologiegetriebenen, hin zu einer evidenzbasierten Politik zu kommen, die unvoreingenommen wirksame von unwirksamen Maßnahmen trennt und gesamtgesellschaftliche Folgen in den Blick nimmt (z. B. https://www.linksfraktion.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/detail/kompetenz- statt-ideologie-in-der-drogenpolitik/). Die Beratung durch unabhängige Expert*innen aus un- terschiedlichen Fachdisziplinen ist erforderlich nicht nur um den aktuellen Wissenstand in Er- fahrung zu bringen, sondern auch um die Meinungsbildung in der Politik transparent zu ma- chen. DIE LINKE hat im Bundestag gefordert, die beabsichtigten und unbeabsichtigten Auswir- kungen der Drogenpolitik unabhängig evaluieren zu lassen (Antrag auf Bundestagsdrucksache 19/1613, http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/016/1801613.pdf).
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/22675 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/22675 19. Wahlperiode 18.09.2020 Schriftliche Fragen mit den in der Woche vom 14. September 2020 eingegangenen Antworten der Bundesregierung Verzeichnis der Fragenden Abgeordnete Nummer Abgeordnete Nummer der Frage der Frage Achelwilm, Doris (DIE LINKE.) ...................1 Fricke, Otto (FDP) ............................47, 97 Akbulut, Gökay (DIE LINKE.) .................. 31 Gastel, Matthias Alt, Renata (FDP) ............................... 111 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 98 Amtsberg, Luise Göring-Eckardt, Katrin (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 16 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 65 Bartsch, Dietmar, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ............. 82 Gohlke, Nicole (DIE LINKE.) .............. 18, 113 Bauer, Nicole (FDP) ..........................76, 77 Hahn, André, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ................. 71 Bause, Margarete Hanke, Reginald (FDP) .......................54, 83 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 32 Held, Marcus (SPD) ........................ 99, 100 Bayaz, Danyal, Dr. Helling-Plahr, Katrin (FDP) ...................... 55 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................2, 3 Hemmelgarn, Udo Theodor (AfD) .......... 66, 101 Bayram, Canan Herbrand, Markus (FDP) ........................7, 8 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ...............53, 80 Hess, Martin (AfD) ...................19, 20, 21, 56 Brantner, Franziska, Dr. (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ...........17, 33, 34 Hessel, Katja (FDP) ................................9 Buchholz, Christine (DIE LINKE.) ............35, 36 Höchst, Nicole
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Integration, Asylum: Political Developments in Germany 2015 Grote, Janne; Müller, Andreas; Vollmer, Michael
    www.ssoar.info Migration, Integration, Asylum: Political Developments in Germany 2015 Grote, Janne; Müller, Andreas; Vollmer, Michael Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Forschungsbericht / research report Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grote, J., Müller, A., & Vollmer, M. (2016). Migration, Integration, Asylum: Political Developments in Germany 2015. (Annual Policy Report / Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ)). Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ); Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Nationale Kontaktstelle für das Europäische Migrationsnetzwerk (EMN). https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68289-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses
    [Show full text]
  • Die Abgeordneten Der Bundes
    Die Wahlkreisbüros der LINKEN in Nordrhein-Westfalen Die BürgerInnenbüro Ingrid Remmers Wahlkreisbüro Kathrin Vogler Wahlkreisbüro Kathrin Vogler Abgeordnetenbüro Inge Höger Abgeordneten Bismarckstr. 65, 45881 Gelsenkirchen Eper Str. 10, 48599 Gronau Rheiner Str. 39, 48282 Emsdetten Radewiger Str. 10, 32052 Herford Telefon (02 09) 38 65 19 90 Telefon (0 25 62) 7 18 59 80 Telefon (0 25 72) 9 60 77 60 Telefon (0 52 21) 1 74 90 71 der Bundes- Telefax (02 09) 38 65 06 09 Telefax (0 25 62) 7 18 59 81 Telefax (0 25 72) 9 60 67 65 Telefax (0 52 21) 1 74 90 73 Mail [email protected] Mail kathrin.vogler.wk.05@ Mail [email protected] Mail [email protected] wk.bundestag.de tagsfraktion Wahlkreisbüro Niema Movassat August-Bebel-Str. 126, 33603 Bielefeld DIE LINKE Elsässerstr. 19, 46045 Oberhausen Telefon: (05 21) 5 20 29 02 Telefon (02 08) 69 69 15 37 Telefax: (05 21) 5 20 29 03 Telefax (02 08) 69 69 15 39 Mail: [email protected] Nordrhein- Mail [email protected] Westfalen Wilhelm-Lantermann-Str. 55, Wahlkreisbüro Ulla Jelpke/ 46535 Dinslaken Linkes Zentrum Telefon (0 20 64) 4 81 54 06 Achtermannstr. 19, 48143 Münster Telefax (0 20 64) 4 81 55 42 Telefon (02 51) 4 90 92 46 Mail [email protected] Telefax (02 51) 4 90 92 92 Mail [email protected] Wahlkreisbüro Ulla Lötzer Severinstr. 1, 45127 Essen BürgerInnenbüro Ingrid Remmers (02 01) 49 02 14 51 Telefon Klosterstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 228. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Freitag, 7. Mai 2021 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 1 Änderungsantrag der Abgeordneten Christian Kühn (Tübingen), Daniela Wagner, Britta Haßelmann, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN zu der zweiten Beratung des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung Drs. 19/24838, 19/26023, 19/29396 und 19/29409 Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Mobilisierung von Bauland (Baulandmobilisierungsgesetz) Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 611 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 98 Ja-Stimmen: 114 Nein-Stimmen: 431 Enthaltungen: 66 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 07.05.2021 Beginn: 12:25 Ende: 12:57 Seite: 1 Seite: 2 Seite: 2 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Dr. Michael von Abercron X Stephan Albani X Norbert Maria Altenkamp X Peter Altmaier X Philipp Amthor X Artur Auernhammer X Peter Aumer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Maik Beermann X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Sybille Benning X Dr. André Berghegger X Melanie Bernstein X Christoph Bernstiel X Peter Beyer X Marc Biadacz X Steffen Bilger X Peter Bleser X Norbert Brackmann X Michael Brand (Fulda) X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Dr. Helge Braun X Silvia Breher X Sebastian Brehm X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Dr. Carsten Brodesser X Gitta Connemann X Astrid Damerow X Alexander Dobrindt X Michael Donth X Marie-Luise Dött X Hansjörg Durz X Thomas Erndl X Dr. Dr. h. c. Bernd Fabritius X Hermann Färber X Uwe Feiler X Enak Ferlemann X Axel E. Fischer (Karlsruhe-Land) X Dr. Maria Flachsbarth X Thorsten Frei X Dr. Hans-Peter Friedrich (Hof) X Maika Friemann-Jennert X Michael Frieser X Hans-Joachim Fuchtel X Ingo Gädechens X Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag Beschlussempfehlung Und Bericht
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 18/1788 18. Wahlperiode 19.06.2014 Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Ausschusses für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (19. Ausschuss) zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Uwe Kekeritz, Friedrich Ostendorff, Claudia Roth (Augsburg), weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN – Drucksache 18/979 – Weltagrarbericht jetzt unterzeichnen A. Problem Vor dem Hintergrund, dass rund 842 Millionen Menschen chronisch unterernährt sind und über 2 Milliarden Menschen unter chronischer Mangelversorgung mit lebenswichtigen Mikronährstoffen leiden, haben Weltbank und Vereinte Nationen 2002 den Weltagrarrat mit dem Ziel der Reduktion von weltweiter Unterernährung und Armut berufen. Der Weltagrarrat hat am Ende eines langen Konsultationsprozesses unter Beteili- gung von Regierungen, Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Sponsoren sowie inter- nationalen Agrarunternehmen den Weltagrarbericht (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development – IAASTD) von 2008, „Agriculture at a Crossroads“, verabschiedet. Dieser Bericht, der eine grundsätzliche Neuausrichtung von Agrarpolitik und Ag- rarforschung fordert, insbesondere eine Ausdehnung der ökologischen, bäuerlichen Landwirtschaft, ist bisher von 58 Staaten unterzeichnet worden. Deutschland hat diesen Bericht bislang nicht unterzeichnet. B. Lösung Die Bundesregierung unterzeichnet den Weltagrarbericht (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development – IAASTD) des Weltagrarrates
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Germany's Netzdg Law
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) An Analysis of Germany's NetzDG Law Tworek, H.; Leerssen, P. Publication date 2019 Document Version Other version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Tworek, H., & Leerssen, P. (2019). An Analysis of Germany's NetzDG Law. Transatlantic High Level Working Group on Content Moderation Online and Freedom of Expression. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 An Analysis of Germany’s NetzDG Law† Heidi Tworek, University of British Columbia Paddy Leerssen, Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam1 April 15, 2019 Contents Introduction: What is the NetzDG? ........................................................................................................... 1 Freedom of Expression Implications ......................................................................................................... 2 The NetzDG in Practice: What Does the Evidence Show? .................................................................... 4 Outlooks and Next Steps ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RTF Template
    19. Wahlperiode Ausschuss für Bildung, Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung Mitteilung Berlin, den 11. September 2020 Die 53. Sitzung des Ausschusses für Bildung, Sekretariat Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung Telefon: +49 30 227 - 32861 Fax: +49 30 227 - 36845 findet statt am Mittwoch, dem 16. September 2020, 9:30 Uhr Sitzungssaal Paul-Löbe-Haus - Sitzungssaal E 700 Telefon: +49 30 227 - 30309 Fax: +49 30 227 - 36354 Tagesordnung Tagesordnungspunkt 1 Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. h. c. Thomas Federführend: Sattelberger, Jens Beeck, Katja Suding, weiterer Ausschuss für Bildung, Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der FDP Mitberatend: Teilhabe von Menschen mit Behinderungen in den Ausschuss für Arbeit und Soziales außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen Ausschuss für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend stärken Berichterstatter/in: Abg. Andreas Steier [CDU/CSU] BT-Drucksache 19/20530 Abg. René Röspel [SPD] Abg. Dr. Michael Espendiller [AfD] Abg. Dr. h. c. Thomas Sattelberger [FDP] Abg. Dr. Petra Sitte [DIE LINKE.] Abg. Kai Gehring [BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN] Voten angefordert für den: 16.09.2020 19. Wahlperiode Seite 1 von 7 Ausschuss für Bildung, Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung Tagesordnungspunkt 2 a) Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Petra Sitte, Nicole Federführend: Gohlke, Doris Achelwilm, weiterer Abgeordneter Ausschuss für Bildung, Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. Mitberatend: Prekäre Arbeitsbedingungen in der Wissenschaft Auswärtiger Ausschuss wirksam bekämpfen Ausschuss für Wirtschaft und Energie Ausschuss für Arbeit und Soziales BT-Drucksache 19/6420 Ausschuss für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend Ausschuss Digitale Agenda Haushaltsausschuss Berichterstatter/in: Abg. Dr. Astrid Mannes [CDU/CSU] Abg. Dr. Wiebke Esdar [SPD] Abg. Dr. Götz Frömming [AfD] Abg. Dr. Jens Brandenburg (Rhein-Neckar) [FDP] Abg.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Netzdg As Role Model Or Cautionary Tale? Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability
    Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 31 XXXI Number 4 Article 4 2021 The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability Patrick Zurth Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the International Law Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Patrick Zurth, The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability, 31 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1084 (2021). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol31/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The German NetzDG as Role Model or Cautionary Tale? Implications for the Debate on Social Media Liability Cover Page Footnote Dr. iur., LL.M. (Stanford). Postdoctoral Fellow at the Chair for Private Law and Intellectual Property Law with Information- and IT-Law (GRUR-chair) (Prof. Dr. Matthias Leistner, LL.M. (Cambridge)) at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany. Thanks to Professor David Freeman Engstrom, Abhilasha Vij, Jasmin Hohmann, Shazana Rohr, and the editorial board of the Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal for helpful comments and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Integration, Asylum
    Migration, Integration, Asylum Political Developments in Germany 2015 Annual Policy Report by the German National Contact Point for the European Migration Network (EMN) Co-financed by the European Union Migration, Integration, Asylum Political Developments in Germany 2015 Annual Policy Report by the German National Contact Point for the European Migration Network (EMN) Federal Office for Migration and Refugees 2016 Summary 5 Summary The German Bundestag passed a number of amendments The 2015 Policy Report of the German National Contact over the course of 2015, which include Point for the European Migration Network (EMN) provides an overview of the most important political dis- ■■ the Act on the redefinition of the right to stay and cussions as well as political and legislative developments the termination of residence (entry into force: in the areas of migration, integration, and asylum in the 1 August 2015), Federal Republic of Germany in the year 2015. The report ■■ Act on the Acceleration of Asylum Procedures – refers specifically to measures taken by the Federal Asylum Package I (entry into force: 24 October 2015), Republic of Germany to implement the Global Approach ■■ Act to improve accommodation, care and assistance to Migration and Mobility, the EU Strategy towards for foreign children and young persons (entry into the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings and the force: 1 November 2015), European Agenda for the Integration of Third-Country ■■ Third Victims’ Rights Reform Act (entry into force: Nationals. The report also describes the general struc- 31 December 2015). ture of the political and legal system in Germany. In addition to the legislation of the Bundestag, the Federal Ministry for Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS) revised the The jump in asylum migration and how to deal with it Employment Ordinance (BeschV) in 2015, which forms the was the central migration, integration and asylum issue basis for allowing immigrants in certain occupations and in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Plenarprotokoll 18/230
    Plenarprotokoll 18/230 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografscher Bericht 230. Sitzung Berlin, Mittwoch, den 26. April 2017 Inhalt: Tagesordnungspunkt 1: Jürgen Klimke (CDU/CSU) .............. 23142 D Befragung der Bundesregierung: 15. Entwick- Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23143 A lungspolitischer Bericht der Bundesregie- rung „Entwicklungspolitik als Zukunfts- Heike Hänsel (DIE LINKE) .............. 23143 B und Friedenspolitik“; weitere Fragen Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23143 C Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23137 C Peter Meiwald (BÜNDNIS 90/ Uwe Kekeritz (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23143 D DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23138 C Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23143 D Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23139 A Sibylle Pfeifer (CDU/CSU) .............. 23144 A Niema Movassat (DIE LINKE) ........... 23139 C Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23144 B Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23139 D Volker Beck (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ Peter Meiwald (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23144 C DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23140 A Michael Roth, Staatsminister AA .......... 23144 D Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23140 A Wolfgang Gehrcke (DIE LINKE) .......... 23145 A Dr. Claudia Lücking-Michel (CDU/CSU) ... 23140 B Michael Roth, Staatsminister AA .......... 23145 B Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23140 C Volker Beck (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ Heike Hänsel (DIE LINKE) .............. 23140 C DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23145 B Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23141 A Michael Roth, Staatsminister AA .......... 23145 C Dagmar G. Wöhrl (CDU/CSU) ............ 23141 B Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23141 B Tagesordnungspunkt 2: Dr. Frithjof Schmidt (BÜNDNIS 90/ Fragestunde DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23141 C Drucksache 18/12020 ................... 23145 D Dr. Gerd Müller, Bundesminister BMZ ..... 23141 D Uwe Kekeritz (BÜNDNIS 90/ Mündliche Frage 1 DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 23142 A Sylvia Kotting-Uhl (BÜNDNIS 90/ Dr.
    [Show full text]