The Fort Pierre, South Dakota C&NW Train Depot Part 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Fort Pierre, South Dakota C&NW Train Depot Part 1 Author’s Note: Railroads have many The components. Traditionally the bulk of the attention of railroad enthusiasts has been oriented toward rolling stock, particularly locomotives. Huge huffing, puffing work- horses draw the awe of railroaders and bystanders alike. And with an engineer in Fort Pierre, South Dakota the cab waving and blowing the whistle, engines virtually came alive. But there are many other parts of a railroad. These include fixed buildings such as storage sheds, water towers, workshops, C&NW Train Depot tracks, bridges, and of course depots. Some railroaders feel that depots do not “get their due” in the grand scheme of railroad his- tory, somewhat because so many have been demolished or otherwise lost. Fortunately, there has been at least some attempt to find, restore, and return these structures to their rightful place in railroad history. This is the story of C&NW’s Fort Pierre, Part 1 S.D., train depot, its construction, use, aban- donment, sale, removal, ranch use, return to Fort Pierre, and recent rehabilitation. he late 19th century was a time of great change in middle America. New states by Gary Grittner Twere being created, and the turmoil of the Civil War was largely in the rear view mirror. The nation’s population was expanding rapidly and people were looking for land and opportunities outside the settled areas of the East Coast. The land west of the Mississippi River looked like a tremendous opportunity and the Homestead Act made it affordable. The Federal Government’s concessions to the railroads offered an additional incentive — expand the existing railroad system westward and bring settlers to the open land along the tracks. To make this opportunity a reality, the Chicago & North Western Railroad extended the rails from Tracy, Minn., to Pierre, S.D., in 1880. Towns sprung up along the line and homesteaders moved in and established communities. In 1889, South Dakota became the 40th state in the Union, and rail expansion continued. There were challenges, of course. At Pierre, bridging the Missouri River was a technological and financial challenge. This was particularly so since the area west of the Missouri was still part of the Great Sioux Reservation. By 1906, several changes had been made, including the opening of much of the reserva- tion lands to settlement. The C&NW seized on the opportunity and platted an extension of the railroad from Pierre to Rapid City. A bridge was built across the Missouri River between Pierre and Fort Pierre. The route west followed the Bad River drainage to near Wasta, S.D., where the Cheyenne River was crossed. From there the route continued westward to Rapid City and eventually along the northern Black Hills to the 16 North Western Lines 2018, Number 4 Above: The Fort Pierre depot stands next freight to be moved into and out of the depot. Two power was added in 1913. Seventeen single-hung to the C&NW line with the outhouse situ- brick chimneys allowed for up to four stoves to windows provided light during the day. Access to ated a few feet away. Today, this location heat the building. A slate roof topped the entire the people portion of the building was via three is where the Yes Now convenience store building, and a 14-foot-wide paver brick, plank exterior doors that opened toward the platform resides. The exact date of this image is and cinder platform provided access from the and tracks. The doors were topped by transom unknown but guessed to be after 1943. — depot to the tracks. The building had no run- windows, which opened to allow additional South Dakota State Archives ning water or toilet, but a sturdy outhouse was ventilation in the summer. The only interior door available. was between the small registration room and the Wyoming border. Along the route, many railroad In the middle of the depot was the agent’s agent’s office. This design enhanced security, as structures were constructed to support the trains office, which handled the railroad business in the most of the railroad transactions were paid in and the people, mail, and freight they transported. Fort Pierre area. Surprisingly, the agent’s office cash. The scheme apparently was successful, as By 1907, the trains started rolling westward. It built-in cabinetry was not elaborate, and could a cursory review of history revealed no robberies was now possible to travel by rail from the East even be considered cheap. of the depot. Coast through Chicago all the way to Rapid City. As built, the depot had no electricity. City For roughly a half century, the stately and Fort Pierre Depot Constructed in 1906 In 1906, a new depot was built in Fort Pierre as part of the expansion. The C&NW depot in Fort Pierre was a Standard No. 1 station depot, 90 feet long and 20 feet wide with two passenger (men’s, women and children’s) waiting rooms. It was fashionably finished with horizontal var- nished Douglas fir bead board upper walls and ceilings and painted bead board wainscoting in the “people” rooms of the building. The 34-foot 3-inch by 20-foot freight room was more rug- gedly functional with open upper stud walls and rafter ceiling. Rough cut Douglas fir wainscot boards inside the freight room protected the walls from rough freight handling. Two 74-inch-wide sliding doors on each side of the room allowed Right: This postcard, published by Fred A. Mix & Company, shows the first telegraph office in Fort Pierre. —Virginia Windedahl Hart collection The Fort Pierre, South Dakota, C&NW Train Depot — Part 1 17 Last Depot Agent Makes Station Temporary Home The C&NW railroad moved depot agents Pierre. Ernest decided that the men’s waiting depot a home and the surrounding property around from time to time. In 1943, a new agent room of the depot could be made into tempo- very comfortable. They even creating a park was assigned to Fort Pierre. Ernest Windedahl rary living quarters for the family while they area on the street side complete with many arrived with his wife, Gladys, and children, searched for a permanent home. (The women trees and flowers along with a garage for the Virginia and James. It was in the middle of and children’s waiting room was retained for family car. The added a separate outhouse for World War II, and housing was scarce in Fort passengers.) Ernest and Gladys made the the family. (See sidebar on opposite page.) sturdy depot remained part and parcel of the Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte in 1803. We now frame, by the end of World War II the transporta- fabric of life in Fort Pierre. call it the Louisiana Purchase. tion system in the United States was changing. • As a young girl, Jane Metzinger went with A combination of improved roads (including the Early History of the Depot her mother to the depot in the spring to send Interstate system), more advanced automobiles, The railroads have always been leaders in mom’s fur coat by train to Huron, S.D., for cold and airplanes eroded the preeminence of the keeping records. For instance, when a section storage at Eilers Furs. Jane recalls that in the fall railroads. Local passenger service was largely of rail fails, they can go to their records and she excitedly returned with her mom to the depot discontinued by the early 1950s, reducing the determine which smelter lot the rail came from to retrieve the coat. value of passenger depots. Long haul mail service and where other rails from that smelter lot are • Longtime resident Carla Sahr remembers was captured by the airlines. The C&NW went located. If necessary, all those affected rails are that when she was a child, her grandmother through a series of consolidations, employee removed and replaced and appropriate documen- Louisa Fischer got ill with the consumption and ownerships, and corporate adjustments. tation recorded. The Chicago & North Western was unable to be treated in Pierre. It was 1909 But by 1958, the die was cast. The Fort Historical Society has many of the records that and two doctors in Rochester, Minn., had estab- Pierre depot was closed and boarded up. Ernest were retained, but a thorough review of records lished a clinic there. The Mayo brothers thought Windedahl and his family were transferred to pertaining to the Fort Pierre depot has not been they might be able to help Mrs. Fischer, but she Ainsworth, Neb. For the next five years the depot done. However, there are a few historic tidbits could not withstand a buggy ride the 500-plus slowly deteriorated, much like the railroad that that are interesting including: miles to Rochester. A railroad boxcar was rented had built the building. • J.J. (Jack) Farrell was the first depot agent and outfitted with a bed and other necessities. In 1963, the C&NW declared the building and served as agent for at least 30 years. He was Accompanied by her husband, Mrs. Fischer was surplus and put it, along with several other depots the brother of Bernie Farrell, who later became transported by the C&NW Railroad to Rochester along the Fort Pierre to the Wyoming border, up general passenger agent for the C&NW Railroad. and back in the boxcar. Unfortunately, she died for auction sale. Mr. Shirley Miller, a rancher • A young fellow by the name of Bert O’Reilly later in 1909. (Note: Consumption is an outdated from Mud Butte, S.D., along with his brothers, wrote his name on the freight room wall (graffiti diagnostic term for a wasting disease, typically Earl and Ronald, bid on seven of the depots.
Recommended publications
  • Floods in North and South Dakota Frequency and Magnitude
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS IN NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE By John A. McCabe and Orlo A. Crosby Prepared in cooperation with the NORTH DAKOTA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AND THE SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Open-file report Bismarck, North Dakota May 1959 DEC 15 1967 PREFACE This report was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the North Dakota State Highway Department and the South Dakota Department of Highways. The work was performed under the supervision of H. M. Erskine. District Engineer, Surface Water Branch. Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey. The authors were assisted by R. E. West. Advice and review were furnished by the Floods Section. Surface Water Branch, Washington. D. C. The streamflow records used in this report were collected and compiled by the U. S. Geological Survey co­ operating with the following agencies: the North Dakota State Engineer and State Water Conservation Commission; pthe South Dakota State Engineer, State Geologist. State Fish and Game Commission, and State Water Resources Commission; the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army; the Department of State; the Bureau of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; the Soil Conservation Service, Department of Agriculture; and others. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. .................. 1 Gaging-station records--Continued Introduction ................. 1 Red River of the North basin--Continued Description of the area .......... 1 Sheyenne River at West Fargo, Physiography ............ 1 N. Dak. (13). ........... 41 Climate ............... 1 Maple River at Mapleton, N. Dak. (14) . 42 Causes of floods ............. 1 Rush River at Amenia, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota
    Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 262 Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota By RICHARD FOSTER FLINT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 262 Prepared as part of the program of the Department of the Interior *Jfor the development-L of*J the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $3 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract_ _ _____-_-_________________--_--____---__ 1 Pre- Wisconsin nonglacial deposits, ______________ 41 Scope and purpose of study._________________________ 2 Stratigraphic sequence in Nebraska and Iowa_ 42 Field work and acknowledgments._______-_____-_----_ 3 Stream deposits. _____________________ 42 Earlier studies____________________________________ 4 Loess sheets _ _ ______________________ 43 Geography.________________________________________ 5 Weathering profiles. __________________ 44 Topography and drainage______________________ 5 Stream deposits in South Dakota ___________ 45 Minnesota River-Red River lowland. _________ 5 Sand and gravel- _____________________ 45 Coteau des Prairies.________________________ 6 Distribution and thickness. ________ 45 Surface expression._____________________ 6 Physical character. _______________ 45 General geology._______________________ 7 Description by localities ___________ 46 Subdivisions. ________-___--_-_-_-______ 9 Conditions of deposition ___________ 50 James River lowland.__________-__-___-_--__ 9 Age and correlation_______________ 51 General features._________-____--_-__-__ 9 Clayey silt. __________________________ 52 Lake Dakota plain____________________ 10 Loveland loess in South Dakota. ___________ 52 James River highlands...-------.-.---.- 11 Weathering profiles and buried soils. ________ 53 Coteau du Missouri..___________--_-_-__-___ 12 Synthesis of pre- Wisconsin stratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Supplemental EIS for the Keystone XL Project
    Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3 Keystone XL Project Affected Environment 3.3 WATER RESOURCES 3.3.1 Introduction This section discusses water resources in the proposed Project area. The description of water resources is based on information provided in the 2011 Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) as well as new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns that have become available since the publication of the Final EIS, including the proposed major reroute in Nebraska and numerous minor (less than 1 mile) route modifications in Montana and South Dakota. The information provided here builds on the information provided in the Final EIS as well as the 2013 Draft Supplemental EIS and, in many instances, replicates that information with relatively minor changes and updates: other information is entirely new or substantially altered from that presented in the Final EIS. Specifically, the following information, data, methods, and/or analyses have been substantially updated from the 2011 document: • Well data (depth, hydrogeology, and water quality) near the proposed Project area in Montana and South Dakota were added. • Tribal lands are considered in the Surface Water sections. • Major proposed route modifications in much of Nebraska necessitated new data collection and analysis including wells locations, water depths, water quality, and hydrogeologic (aquifer) analysis. • The number and type of stream crossings and stream crossing methods have changed due to route modifications as well as updated field survey information provided by TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP (Keystone). The stream crossing assessment was comprised of a desktop analysis based on National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) information and supplemented by Keystone field survey descriptions where available.
    [Show full text]
  • By G. HUBERT SMITH
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 176 River Basin Surveys Papers, No. 18 Fort Pierre II (39ST217), a Historic Trading Post in the Oahe Dam Area, South Dakota By G. HUBERT SMITH 83 602329—6C CONTENTS PAGE Foreword 87 Historical background 90 Description of the site 108 Archeological evidence obtained 112 Architectural evidence 116 Artifactual evidence 130 Construction materials and building hardware; fuel 130 Tools and implements 132 Harness and farriery; wagon parts 132 Furniture and household articles 133 Mihtary goods 136 Personal possessions 137 Trade goods 141 Subsistence 143 Artifacts of native significance 144 Miscellaneous 145 Discussion 146 Recommendations 151 References cited 155 PLATES (All plates follow page 158) 19. a, Site of Fort Pierre II (39ST217) prior to excavation; cellar pit right center; farm buildings rear, b, Blading operations; exploratory trenches (right) mark west stockade line. 20. a, Adobe brick chimney base, House site A. b, Enclosure (probable site of blockhouse) at southwest angle of stockade. 21. a, Detail of north stockade trench near midpoint, b, Northeast angle of stockade trench. 22. a, House site B, view west, b, East fireplace, House site B. 23. Aerial view, southeast, of site under excavation. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers photograph.) 24. Building hardware; tools and implements; harness and farriery; wagon parts. 25. Household articles. 26. Household articles. 27. Military and personal articles. 28. Trade goods. 29. Trade goods. 30. Artifacts of native significance. MAPS PAGE 3. Area of Fort Pierre II, South Dakota 86 4. Fort Pierre II (39ST217), Oahe Reservoir (facing) 113 85 86 — FORT PIERRE II (39ST217) A HISTORIC TRADING POST IN THE OAHE DAM AREA, SOUTH DAKOTA^ By G.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Pierre Area South Dakota
    Geology of the Pierre Area South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 307 Geology of the Pierre Area South Dakota By DWIGHT R. CRANDELL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 307 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Rock formations Continued Introduction_ ______________________________________ 2 Deposits of Recent and Pleistocene age Continued Location, culture, and accessibility. _____________ 2 Loess Continued Purpose and scope of study_ _____________________ 2 Buried soil profiles in loess_______________ 39 Field work and acknowledgments.- _____________ 3 Rate of loess accumulation_______________ 42 Earlier studies. ___ _________________________ 4 Spring deposits-_______________-__------____ 42 Geography_ _ _____________________________________ 4 Landslide deposits________________-_----____ 43 Relief and drainage.____________________________ 4 Fan deposits._____--_______-__-_-__-__-_--_ 43 Climate and vegetation.. ______________________ 5 Deposits of Recent age_________________________ 43 Soils._________________________________________ 6 Geomorphic development of the area in the Pleistocene Rock formations. __________________________________ 6 epoch ___________________________________________ 44 Precambrian rocks_ __________________________
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota History
    VOL. 41, NO. 1 SPRING 2011 South Dakota History 1 Index to South Dakota History, Volumes 1–40 (1970–2010) COMPILED BY RODGER HARTLEY Copyright 2011 by the South Dakota State Historical Society, Pierre, S.Dak. 57501-2217 ISSN 0361-8676 USER’S GUIDE Over the past forty years, each volume (four issues) of South Dakota History has carried its own index. From 1970 to 1994, these indexes were printed separately upon comple- tion of the last issue for the year. If not bound with the volume, as in a library set, they were easily misplaced or lost. As the journal approached its twenty-fifth year of publica- tion, the editors decided to integrate future indexes into the back of every final issue for the volume, a practice that began with Volume 26. To mark the milestone anniversary in 1995, they combined the indexes produced up until that time to create a twenty-five-year cumulative index. As the journal’s fortieth anniversary year of 2010 approached, the need for another compilation became clear. The index presented here integrates the past fifteen volume indexes into the earlier twenty-five-year cumulative index. While indexers’ styles and skills have varied over the years, every effort has been made to create a product that is as complete and consistent as possible. Throughout the index, volume numbers appear in bold-face type, while page numbers are in book-face. Within the larger entries, references to brief or isolated pas- sages are listed at the beginning, while more extensive references are grouped under the subheadings that follow.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018 South Dakota Integrated Report for Surface Water Quality Assessment
    THE 2018 SOUTH DAKOTA INTEGRATED REPORT FOR SURFACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Protecting South Dakota’s Tomorrow…Today Prepared By SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES STEVEN M. PIRNER, SECRETARY SOUTH DAKOTA WATER QUALITY WATER YEARS 2012-2017 (streams) and WATER YEARS 2007-2017 (lakes and mercury in fish tissue) The 2018 South Dakota Integrated Report Surface Water Quality Assessment By the State of South Dakota Pursuant to Sections 305(b), 303(d), and 314 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Steven M. Pirner, Secretary Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 5 III. SURFACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 7 SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING .................................................................................................... 7 SOUTH DAKOTA’S LONG-TERM VISION STRATEGY ................................................................................. 14 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................. 20 STATEWIDE SURFACE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Bad River Basin Study
    UPPER BAD RIVER-RIVER BASIN STUDY Project #5005 Prepared By: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Forest Service In Cooperation With: American Creek Conservation District Badlands Resource Conservation and Development Area Council, Inc. East Pennington Conservation District Haakon County Conservation District Jackson County Conservation District Jones County Conservation District Stanley County Conservation District South Dakota Cooperative Extension Service South Dakota Department of Agriculture, Division of Resource Conservation and Forestry South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources October 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bad River is the smallest of five major river basins in western South Dakota that drain into the Missouri River. It originates in the Badlands near Wall, South Dakota, and flows to the east approximately 100 miles where it discharges into Lake Sharpe near the communities of Fort Pierre and Pierre. The Bad River Watershed encompasses 3,173 square miles of Haakon, Jackson, Jones, Lyman, Pennington, and Stanley Counties. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (COE) gauge data from 1948 to 1986 estimates that the Bad River discharges an average annual sediment load of 3,250,000 tons of sediment into Lake Sharpe. Because of the large sediment load and size of the drainage area, two river basin studies have been conducted: the Lower Bad River-River Basin Study was completed in 1994, and the Upper Bad River-River Basin Study in 1998. The Upper Bad River-River Basin Study is sponsored by the Badlands Resource Conservation and Development (BRCD) Area Council, Inc., and the conservation districts in East Pennington, Haakon, Jackson, Jones, Lyman, and Stanley Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrie Ingalls, Homesteader ©2019 Nancy S
    Carrie Ingalls, Homesteader ©2019 Nancy S. Cleaveland, www.pioneergirl.com The rush of homesteaders and new settlers into the territory west of the Missouri river still continues. They are coming in even larger numbers than they did last year. On March 20, according to the books of the agents at Pierre, five hundred cars of immigrant goods had crossed the bridge at that place since the first of the year. – Bad River News, Philip, South Dakota, March 26, 1808. Philip, South Dakota, June 1907. n September 1907, ranch owners and cowboys completed what was suspected to be the last I cattle roundup of any proportion near Philip, South Dakota, a new town only recently laid out in Stanley County.1 Over fifteen thousand cattle were sorted, dipped, and branded, and the cowboys and ranch men headed farther west. After years of drought and an uncertain economy, a land boom in recent years had brought more homesteaders and their shacks and fenced garden patches to dot the vast free range cattle lands west of the Missouri River.2 The Chicago & North-Western Railroad had connected Fort Pierre and Rapid City in June, and the journey west of the river to Philip could now be made in a few hours instead of days. A railroad bridge over the Missouri River was finished and in use by October, 1 Philip, South Dakota, and Carrie Ingalls’ claim site are located in Haakon County. In 1897, Sterling, Jackson, Nowlin, and Armstrong counties were combined with Stanley County, making it the second largest county in South Dakota, at 4881 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • National United States of America
    THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER. OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOUTH DAKOTA 1989 THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOUTH DAKOTA 1989 "The Pulpit," Badlands National Park, South Dakota. Apparently for farming, that is often spectacularly carved by water and wind into named for its resemblance to a ministerial pulpit, "The Pulpit" is an unusual landforms. On older maps of the area, badlands are indi- example of the complex features characteristic of South Dakota cated by the French name "Mauvaises Terres," which had the Badlands. In South Dakota, the term "badlands" is generally used to implied meaning of "bad-for-traveling lands." (Photograph by H.H. describe rough, broken country, devoid of vegetation and unsuited Darton, 1898, U.S. Geological Survey.) THE NATIONAL GAZETTEER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA- SOUTH DAKOTA 1989 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1200-SD Prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director U.S. BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data The National gazetteer of the United States of America. South Dakota 1989 / prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1200-SD) Supt.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and UNDERGROUND WATERS J of SOUTH DAKOTA (
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEEIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 227 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS j OF SOUTH DAKOTA ( BY N. H. DARTON i ' WASHINGTON GOVEBNMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Geography and topography.................................................. 8 Geology of the Black Hills region............................................ 8 General relations....................................................... 8 Cambrian system....................................................... 10 Deadwood sandstone............................................... 10 Ordovician system..................................................... 11 Whitewood limestone............................................... 11 Carboniferous system................................................... 11 General outline................................................... 11 Englewood limestone............................................... 12 Pahasapa limestone................................................. 12 Minnelusa sandstone................................................ 13 Opeche formation.................................................. 14 Minnekahta limestone............................................. 14 Triassic (?) system..................................................... 15 Spearfish formation................................................. 15 Jurassic system......................................................... 16 Sundance
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Keystone XL Pipeline Project
    TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Project Responsible Federal Agency (Lead): U.S. Department of State Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Western Area Power Administration Title: Financial Support for Transmission and Distribution Lines to Pump Stations 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 in Connection with the TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Location: South Dakota For further information about this record of decision, contact: Dennis Rankin Project Manager USDA, Rural Utilities Service Engineering and Environmental Staff 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Stop 1571, Room 2244 Washington, D.C. 20250-1571 (202) 720-1953 [email protected] For general information on RUS’s process for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, contact: Barbara Britton Director, Water Programs Division Water and Environmental Programs USDA, Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Stop 1571, Room 4010 Washington, D.C. 20250-1571 (202) 720-1649 RECORD OF DECISION Financial Support for Transmission and Distribution Lines to Pump Stations 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 in Connection with the TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Rural Development Agency Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Grand Electric and West Central Electric Cooperatives November 2020 ACRONYMS Acronym Definition ACSR Aluminum conductor steel reinforced BLM Bureau of Land Management BRRU Buffalo Red River Unit CEQ Council on Environmental Quality
    [Show full text]