DOCSLIB.ORG

Food Security in Eurasia 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food Security in Eurasia 2018 Eurasian Center for Food Security Food Security in Eurasia 2018 Case studies Food Security in Eurasia 2018 Case studies Eurasian Center for Food Security ISBN 978-5-6040425-9-5 The content, fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the case study authors and can in no way be taken to refl ect the views of the Eurasian Center for Food Security. “Food Security in Eurasia 2018: Case studies” is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Scientifi c editors: Sergei A. Shoba, Corresponding member of the RAS, Professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University Jonathan Wadsworth, PhD, Lead Agriculture Specialist, The World Bank Pavel P. Sorokin, PhD, Professor, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy Technical editors: Marina Nezhlukto Hope Steele Yulia Mitusova © 2018 Eurasian Center for Food Security, Moscow, Russia. Images: The holder of right to use the images in this publication is “Expert” LLC, and the responsibility for their use rests on “Expert” LLC. Contents Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Agri-Food Sector in the Russian Far North: The Case of Yakutia (Alexey Naumov, Daria Sidorova) ............................................................................................................ 7 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................9 Background ..............................................................................................................................................................................9 Policy Issues .............................................................................................................................................................................12 Stakeholder Groups................................................................................................................................................................16 Policy Options .........................................................................................................................................................................18 Assignment ..............................................................................................................................................................................24 Policy Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................................24 References ..............................................................................................................................................................................25 Additional Readings ...............................................................................................................................................................26 Annex 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................28 Annex 2 ...................................................................................................................................................................................30 Annex 3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................31 Annex 4 ...................................................................................................................................................................................33 Strengthening the Wild Harvest Value Chain in Armenia to Reduce Poverty in Rural Areas (Yulia Mitusova, Sergey Meloyan) ........................................................................................................... 35 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................37 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................37 Policy Issues .............................................................................................................................................................................41 Stakeholder Groups................................................................................................................................................................43 Policy Options .........................................................................................................................................................................45 Assignment ..............................................................................................................................................................................49 Policy Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................................50 References ..............................................................................................................................................................................50 Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................................................................52 Promoting Relationships between Local Agricultural Producers and the National School Meals Programme in the Kyrgyz Republic (Anatoly Maksimov, Yulia Kalinichenko) ................................................................................................ 53 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................55 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................55 Policy Issues .............................................................................................................................................................................59 Stakeholder Groups ...............................................................................................................................................................61 Policy Options .........................................................................................................................................................................62 Assignment ..............................................................................................................................................................................65 Policy Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................................65 References ..............................................................................................................................................................................66 Recommended Literature .....................................................................................................................................................67 Laws and Resolutions of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic ....................................................................................67 Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................................................................68 Improving Fruit and Vegetable Value Chains in Uzbekistan (Darya Ilina, Muzafar Karimov) ................................................................................................................ 69 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................71 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................71 Policy Issues ............................................................................................................................................................................75 © 2018 Eurasian Center for Food Security, Moscow, Russia. 3 Food Security in Eurasia 2018 Stakeholder Groups................................................................................................................................................................78 Policy Options .........................................................................................................................................................................80 Assignment ..............................................................................................................................................................................83 Policy Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................................83
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Papers Published And/Or Accepted for Publication in 2018-2019 (List Incomplete)
    Papers published and/or accepted for publication in 2018-2019 (list incomplete) Allington, G. R. H., Fernandez-Gimenez M. E., Chen Belt (ADB). In: (G Gutman, J Chen, GM Henebry, J, and Brown and D G 2018: Combining M Kappas, eds.) Landscape Dynamics across participatory scenario planning and systems Drylands of Greater Central Asia: People, modeling to identify drivers of future sustainability Societies and Ecosystems. Springer. Chapter 10. on the Mongolian Plateau. Ecology and Chen Y, Tao Y, Cheng Y, Ju W, Ye J, Hickler T, Liao Society 23(2):9. C, Feng L and Ruan H 2018: Great uncertainties https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10034-230209 in modeling grazing impact on carbon An S, Chen X, Zhang XY, Yan D and Henebry GM sequestration: a multi-model inter-comparison in 2018. An exploration of terrain effects on land temperate Eurasian Steppe Environ. Res. surface phenology across the Qinghai-Tibetan Lett. 13 075005 Plateau using Landsat ETM+ and OLI Chen Y, Fei X, Groisman P, Sun Z, Zhang J, and Qin data Remote Sensing 10(7):1069. Z, 2019: Contrasting policy shifts influence the https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071069 pattern of vegetation production and C Bastos A , Peregon A, Gani ÉA, Khudyaev S, Yue C, sequestration over pasture systems: a regional- Li W, Gouveia CM and Ciais P 2018 Influence of scale comparison in Temperate Eurasian Steppe. high-latitude warming and land-use changes in the Agricultural Systems, Accepted. early 20th century northern Eurasian CO2 sink Deppermann A, Balkovič J, Bundle S-C, di Fulvio F, Environ. Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Russia: 1992 Status
    TITLE: Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Russia: 1992 Status AUTHOR: Karen Brooks and Zvi Lerman THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION:* CONTRACTOR: The University of Minnesota PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Karen M. Brooks COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER: 805-18 DATE: August 1 7, 1993 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law. The work leading to this report was supported by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research. The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. RUSSIA LAND REFORM AND FARM RESTRUCTURING IN RUSSIA: 1992 STATUS* Karen Brooks** and Zvi Lerman*** July 1993 This research was supported by a grant from The National Council on Soviet and East European Research to the University of Minnesota and by the World Bank. The Agrarian Institute of the Russian Agricultural Academy of Sciences was a partner throughout the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Mongolia
    © Lonely Planet Publications 219 WESTERN MONGOLIA Western Mongolia With its raw deserts, glacier-wrapped mountains, shimmering salt lakes and hardy culture of nomads, falconry and cattle rustling, western Mongolia is a timeless place that fulfils many romantic notions of the classic ‘Central Asia’. Squeezed between Russia, Kazakhstan, China and the Mongol heartland, this region has been a historical transition zone of endless cultures, the legacy of which is a patchwork of peoples including ethnic Kazakhs, Dorvods, Khotons, Myangads and Khalkh Mongols. The Mongol Altai Nuruu forms the backbone of the region, a rugged mountain range that creates a natural border with both Russia and China. It contains many challenging and popular peaks for mountain climbers, some over 4000m, and is the source of fast-flowing rivers, most of which empty into desert lakes and saltpans. The region’s wild landscape and unique mix of cultures is known among adventure travel- lers and a small tourist infrastructure has been created to support them. Bayan-Ölgii leads the pack with its own clique of tour operators and drivers prepared to shuttle visitors to the mountains. But while aimag capitals are tepidly entering the 21st century, most of the region remains stuck in another age – infrastructure is poor and old-style communist think- ing is the norm among local officials. Despite the hardships, western Mongolia’s attractions, both natural and cultural, are well worth the effort. With time and flexibility, the region may well be the highlight of your trip. HIGHLIGHTS
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Ecology of Agricultural Change in Post-Soviet Russia" (2007)
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College German and Russian Studies Honors Projects May 2007 What Replaced the Kolkhozes and Sovkhozes? A Political Ecology of Agricultural Change in Post- Soviet Russia Elizabeth C. Engebretson Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/gerrus_honors Recommended Citation Engebretson, Elizabeth C., "What Replaced the Kolkhozes and Sovkhozes? A Political Ecology of Agricultural Change in Post-Soviet Russia" (2007). German and Russian Studies Honors Projects. Paper 3. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/gerrus_honors/3 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in German and Russian Studies Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What Replaced the Kolkhozes and Sovkhozes? A Political Ecology of Agricultural Change in Post-Soviet Russia by Elizabeth C. Engebretson Advisor Jim von Geldern, Russian Studies Department Macalester College 30 April 2007 Engebretson ii Abstract Russian agriculture underwent drastic changes after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. A large-scale collective system, with a planned economy, was expected to enter the market economy rapidly with the help of new legislation and programs. Things did not go as the central Russian government and international development organizations had planned. Instead of joining the global capitalist system, rural Russians turned to small private plots and practiced subsistence agriculture for survival. Some people attempted to start private farms but were often not successful because of a lack of capital and structural support. Other enterprises remained variations of collective farms, but without as much state support as before their productivity declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Agrarian Capitalism in the Russian Far East
    Working 13 Paper Chinese Agrarian Capitalism in the Russian Far East Jiayi Zhou May 2015 1 Chinese Agrarian Capitalism in the Russian Far East by Jiayi Zhou Published by: BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Rua Quirino de Andrade, 215 Brasília – DF 70910‐900 São Paulo ‐ SP 01049010 Brazil Brazil Tel: +55 61 3107‐3300 Tel: +55‐11‐5627‐0233 E‐mail: [email protected] E‐mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unb.br/ Website: www.unesp.br Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Transnational Institute Av. Paulo Gama, 110 ‐ Bairro Farroupilha PO Box 14656 Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 1001 LD Amsterdam Brazil The Netherlands Tel: +55 51 3308‐3281 Tel: +31 20 662 66 08 Fax: +31 20 675 71 76 E‐mail: [email protected] E‐mail: [email protected] Website: www.ufrgs.br/ Website: www.tni.org Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS) International Institute of Social Studies University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17 P.O. Box 29776 Bellville 7535, Cape Town 2502 LT The Hague South Africa The Netherlands Tel: +27 21 959 3733 Fax: +27 21 959 3732 Tel: +31 70 426 0460 Fax: +31 70 426 079 E‐mail: [email protected] E‐mail: [email protected] Website: www.plaas.org.za Website: www.iss.nl College of Humanities and Development Studies Future Agricultures Consortium China Agricultural University Institute of Development Studies No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Haidian District University of Sussex Beijing 100193 Brighton BN1 9RE PR China England Tel: +86 10 62731605 Fax: +86 10 62737725 Tel: +44 (0)1273 915670 E‐mail: [email protected] E‐mail: info@future‐agricultures.org Website: http://cohd.cau.edu.cn/ Website: http://www.future‐agricultures.org/ ©May 2015 Editorial committee: Jun Borras, Ben Cousins, Juan Liu & Ben McKay Published with support from Ford Foundation and the National Research Foundation of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Land Use in the North of Russia: Case Study of Karelia and Yakutia
    Open Geosciences 2020; 12: 1497–1511 Transformation of Traditional Cultural Landscapes - Koper 2019 Alexey Naumov*, Varvara Akimova, Daria Sidorova, and Mikhail Topnikov Agriculture and land use in the North of Russia: Case study of Karelia and Yakutia https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0210 Keywords: Northern regions, land use, changes, agricul- received December 31, 2019; accepted November 03, 2020 tural development, agriculture, Russia, Karelia, Yakutia Abstract: Despite harsh climate, agriculture on the northern margins of Russia still remains the backbone of food security. Historically, in both regions studied in this article – the Republic of Karelia and the Republic 1 Introduction of Sakha (Yakutia) – agricultural activities as dairy - farming and even cropping were well adapted to local This article is based on the case study of two large admin – conditions including traditional activities such as horse istrative regions of Russian Federation the Republic of ( ) breeding typical for Yakutia. Using three different Karelia furthermore Karelia and the Republic of Sakha sources of information – official statistics, expert inter- (Yakutia). Territory of both regions is officially considered views, and field observations – allowed us to draw a in Russia as the Extreme North. This notion applies to the conclusion that there are both similarities and differ- whole territory of Yakutia, the largest unit of Russian ences in agricultural development and land use of these Federation and also the largest administrative region two studied regions. The differences arise from agro- worldwide with 3,084 thousand km2 land area. Five ad- climate conditions, settlement history, specialization, ministrative districts (uluses) of Yakutia have an access and spatial pattern of economy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historiographical Overview of Tobacco During the Russian Empire*
    A HISTORIOGRAPHICAL OVERVIEW OF TOBACCO DURING THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE* UN BALANCE HISTORIOGRÁFICO SOBRE EL TABACO EN EL IMPERIO RUSO IRINA YÁNYSHEV-NÉSTEROVA Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ABSTRACT This article aims to present a historiographical evaluation of the research re- garding tobacco in the Russian Empire, from seventeenth century Muscovy until 1917. The studies about tobacco embrace issues related to governmental poli- cies and the appropriate legislation, the regions of cultivation, centres of trade, and prosopography, among others. The article has the following objectives: to outline the periodisation of the tobacco studies, to reveal the works of Russian Imperial, Soviet, contemporary Russian and foreign scholars, to expose the main topics of the research carried out, and set out approximate directions for future research. Keywords: tobacco, Russian Empire, Muscovy, historiography. RESUMEN El objetivo de este artículo es presentar un balance historiográfico de la inves- tigación sobre el tabaco en el Imperio Ruso, desde la Moscovia del siglo XVII hasta 1917. Los estudios sobre el tabaco abarcan los temas relacionados con las políticas gubernamentales y la legislación apropiada, las regiones de culti- vo, centros de comercio y prosopografía entre otros. El documento persigue los siguientes objetivos: esbozar la periodización de los estudios sobre el tabaco, revelar los trabajos de los eruditos imperiales rusos, soviéticos, rusos contempo- ráneos y extranjeros, exponer los temas principales de la investigación realiza- da y establecer direcciones aproximadas para futuros trabajos. Palabras clave: tabaco, Imperio ruso, Moscovia, historiografía. * All the translations from Russian and Ukrainian into English, as well as the responsibility for the possible mistakes, are mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Climate Change Benefit Or Hurt Russian Grain Production? a Statistical Evidence from a Panel Approach
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Belyaeva, Maria; Bokusheva, Raushan Working Paper Will climate change benefit or hurt Russian grain production? A statistical evidence from a panel approach Discussion Paper, No. 161 Provided in Cooperation with: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale) Suggested Citation: Belyaeva, Maria; Bokusheva, Raushan (2017) : Will climate change benefit or hurt Russian grain production? A statistical evidence from a panel approach, Discussion Paper, No. 161, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-69113 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155773 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diptera: Scathophagidae) of Russia Обзор Видов Рода Trichopalpus
    Russian Entomol. J. 28(4): 470–484 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2019 A review of the genus Trichopalpus Rondani, 1856 (Diptera: Scathophagidae) of Russia Îáçîð âèäîâ ðîäà Trichopalpus Rondani, 1856 (Diptera: Scathophagidae) ôàóíû Ðîññèè A.L. Ozerov À.Ë. Îçåðîâ Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Bol’shaya Nikitskaya 2, Moscow 125009, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Зоологический музей, Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова, Большая Никитская ул., 2, Москва 125009, Россия. KEY WORDS: Diptera, Scathophagidae, Trichopalpus, Russia, review, new synonyms, new combination, key. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: Diptera, Scathophagidae, Trichopalpus, Россия, обзор, новые синонимы, новая комбинация, определительная таблица. ABSTRACT. Flies of the genus Trichopalpus Ron- punctipes Meigen, 1826. Becker [1894] as well as dani, 1856 of Russia, which includes 6 species, are Rondani considered these both species in the genus reviewed. Generic and species descriptions and keys Trichopalpus. Coquillett [1898] described the genus for determination of species are given, and data on Chaetosa, transferred punctipes to this genus and desi- distributions are summarized. Two new synonyms are gnated this species as type-species of Chaetosa. In the proposed: Chaetosa Coquillett, 1898 and Huckettia same work, he described another genus, Opsiomyia, Vockeroth, 1995 with Trichopalpus Rondani, 1856. with the North American species O. palpalis Coquil- Microprosopa lacteipennis Ringdahl, 1920 is trans- lett, 1898. Curran [1927] described the species nigriba- ferred to the genus Trichopalpus. sis Curran, 1927 in the genus Trichopalpus. Ringdahl [1936] described the species pilirostris Ringdahl, 1936 РЕЗЮМЕ. Дан обзор двукрылых рода Tricho- in the genus Chaetosa. He also described the subgenus palpus Rondani, 1856 фауны России, включающего Paramicroprosopa with the species subarctica Ring- 6 видов.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in the Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project
    Environmental and Social Management Framework for “Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in The Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project ULAANBAATAR 2020 Required citation: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2020. Environmental and Social Management Framework for “Promoting Dryland Sustainable Landscapes and Biodiversity Conservation in The Eastern Steppe of Mongolia” Project. Ulaanbaatar. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, WWF, 2020 Some rights reserved. This worK is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAliKe 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this worK may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this worK, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Mongolia
    ©Lonely¨Planet¨Publications¨Pty¨Ltd WesternPoP 307,200 / AreA 191,000 sq km Mongolia Why Go? Bayan-Ölgii ................208 Raw, rugged and remote, this off-the-beaten-track region Ölgii ...........................208 has for centuries been isolated – both geographically and culturally – from the Mongol heartland. With its glacier- Altai Tavan Bogd wrapped mountains, shimmering salt lakes and the hardy National Park .............214 culture of nomads, falconry and cattle rustling, western Tolbo Nuur .................217 Mongolia is, in many ways, a timeless slice of Central Asia. Khovd .........................217 Squeezed between Russia, Kazakhstan, China and the Tsenkheriin Agui ........221 rest of Mongolia, this region has long been a patchwork of Uvs ............................223 peoples including ethnic Kazakhs, Dörvöds, Khotons, Myan- gads and Khalkh Mongols. Traditional arts such as khöömii Ulaangom .................223 throat singing and eagle hunting are still practised here, as Üüreg Nuur ...............226 they have been for thousands of years. Zavkhan ....................228 The wild landscape creates fabulous opportunities for Uliastai ......................228 trekkers and climbers on peaks that rise to over 4000m. If that sounds too extreme for you, then just pick a lake, pitch a tent and have yourself a camping trip you’ll never forget. Best for Camping ¨¨khoton Nuur (p215) ¨¨Uureg Nuur (p226) When to Go ¨¨Chigistei Gol (p230) Ölgii °C/°F Temp Rainfall inches/mm ¨¨Around Tarialan (p226) 30/86 4/100 ¨¨ Buyant Gol (p218) 20/68 3.2/80 10/50 2.4/60 0/32 1.6/40 Best for -10/14 Trekking -20/-4 0.8/20 ¨ -30/-22 0 ¨Altai Tavan Bogd National J F M A M J J A S O N D Park (p214) ¨¨kharkhiraa Uul & Türgen Mar Kazakh Jun–Sep Peak Oct–Feb The Uul (p226) families celebrate tourist season, eagle-hunting Navrus (spring but trekkers season kicks off ¨¨otgon Tenger Uul strictly festival) with may still need with Ölgii’s Eagle Protected Area (p231) traditional games sub-zero sleeping Festival.
    [Show full text]