UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Expression Profile and Activation of Components for a Novel Signaling Module Mediating EGFR Transactivation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pn5q6sq Author Lynch, Rebecca Marrie Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Expression Profile and Activation of Components for a Novel Signaling Module Mediating EGFR Transactivation A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biology by Rebecca Marrie Lynch Committee in charge: Paul A. Insel, Chair Julian Schroeder, Co-Chair Aaron B. Coleman 2015 Copyright Rebecca Marrie Lynch, 2015 All rights reserved The thesis of Rebecca Marrie Lynch is approved and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Co-chair _____________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page…………………………………………………..………………………..iii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………..……………..iv List of Abbreviations.......………………………………………………..………….……vi List of Figures………………………………………………………..………………..…vii List of Tables………………………………………….………………………………….ix Acknowledgements…………………..…………………………………………………...ix Abstract of the Thesis…………………………………………….…………………….…x Chapter 1. Introduction…..……………………..……………………………………...….1 1.1. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)……………………………….….……1 1.2. Matrix Metalloproteases……..………………………….……………….…...2 1.3. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor….……………..………………………..4 1.4. Membrane-Delimited EGFR Transactivation Mechanism...…………………5 1.5. Bradykinin……………..…….…………………..……………………………7 1.6. NIH 3T3 cells, rat cardiac myocytes, and HeLa cells………………………...7 1.7. Hypothesis and Goals…………...………………………………………...…8 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods…….…………………………………………………10 2.1. Reagents ………………………………………………………….................10 2.2. Cell Culture……………..……………………………………………..….....10 2.3. Isolation of Adult Rat Ventricular Myocytes……………………………..…10 2.3. Membrane Isolation………………………………………………………....11 2.3.1. Crude Membrane Isolation……………………………………..…11 2.3.2. 101 Bio® Plasma Membrane Protein Extraction……………….....12 2.4. Protein Analysis……………………………………………………...……...13 2.4.1. Bradford Protein Assay…………………………………...…….....13 2.4.2. Western Blots……………………………………………………..13 2.5. TaqMan® GPCR Array……………………………………………………..14 Chapter 3. Results: GPCR Expression Profiles for NIH 3T3 and HeLa Cells…………..15 3.1. Quantification of GPCR Expression in NIH 3T3 and HeLa Cells…………15 3.2. GPCR Expression in NIH 3T3 cells………..……………………………….15 3.3. GPCR Expression in HeLa cells………….…………………………...…….21 Chapter 4. Results: Baseline Expression of the Signaling Molecules in the Proposed Mechanism……………………………………………………………….........………....26 Chapter 5. Results: GPCR agonists mediating EGFR transactivation………..………….33 iv Chapter 6. Discussion...……………………………………………………....……...…..39 Chapter 7. Future Directions……………………………………………………………..47 Chapter 8. Appendix…….…………………………………………………………….…49 8.1. GPCR Expression in NIH 3T3 cells………………………………………...49 8.2. GPCR Expression in HeLa cells…………………………………………….54 References…………………………………………….……………..…………………...58 v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS GPCR = G protein-coupled receptor MMP = matrix metalloprotease MT1-MMP = Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloprotease Hb-EGF= Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor EGFR= Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor PBST= 1X Phosphate Buffered Saline Tween-20 UT= untreated EGF= epidermal growth factor BK = bradykinin AG 1478/EGFRinh = inhibitor of EGFR MMP14inh = inhibitor of MT1-MMP vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. GPCR-mediated transactivation of EGFR………………………………....…...5 Figure 2. Proposed Mechanism of GPCR-mediated EGFR transactivation……………...6 Figure 3.1. Total GPCR expression in NIH 3T3 cells…………………………………..17 Figure 3.2. Total GPCR expression in HeLa cells……………..…………..……………22 Figure 3.3. Comparison of GPCR Expression in NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells…………….22 Figure 4.1. Protein Expression of MT1-MMP…………..………………………………28 Figure 4.2. Protein Expression of hb-EGF…………...…………………….……………29 Figure 4.3. Protein Expression of EGFR………………………………………………..30 Figure 4.4. Protein Expression of PEGFR………………………………………………31 Figure 4.5. Protein Expression of ß-Arrestin 1/2 and Src……………………………….32 Figure 5.1. HeLa lysates and membranes treated with recombinant human EGF………35 Figure 5.2. HeLa lysates and membranes treated with the GPCR agonist bradykinin….36 Figure 5.3. EGF Time-course ……………………………………………...………..….37 . Figure 5.4. HeLa membranes treated with EGF, GTPyS, Bradykinin (BK), and the inhibitor AG 1478……………………………………………………………….…….…38 Figure 5.5. Pooled data of HeLa membranes treated with EGF, Bradykinin (BK), AG 1478, and Peptide G……………………………………….…………………………..…38 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1. The Twenty Highest Expressed GPCRs in NIH 3T3 cells……………….…18 Table 3.2. The Five Highest Expressed Orphan Receptors in NIH 3T3 cells…………...18 Table 3.3. The Five Highest Expressed Gi-linked Receptors in NIH 3T3 cells…..…….19 Table 3.4. The Five Highest Expressed Gq-linked Receptors in NIH 3T3 cells …...…..19 Table 3.5. The Five Highest Expressed Gs-linked Receptors in NIH 3T3 cells………...20 Table 3.6. The Five Highest Expressed G12/G13 Receptors in NIH 3T3 cells…….…...20 Table 3.7. The Twenty Highest Expressed GPCRs in HeLa cells………………………23 Table 3.8. The Five Highest Expressed Orphan Receptors in HeLa cells………………23 Table 3.9. The Five Highest Expressed Gi-linked Receptors in HeLa cells……....…….24 Table 3.10. The Five Highest Expressed Gq-linked Receptors in HeLa cells..………....24 Table 3.11. The Five Highest Expressed Gs-linked Receptors in HeLa cells…………..25 Table 3.12. The Five Highest Expressed G12/G13 Receptors in HeLa cells……….......25 viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge Paul Insel for his support as the chair of my committee. Throughout the past two years, Paul has given me countless opportunities to participate in novel research and has given me experiences that will be invaluable to me in my professional and personal life. I would also like to acknowledge my advisor and mentor, Aaron Overland, for his unfailing guidance, encouragement, and support throughout the duration of my time in the lab. His advice and insight into the direction of my project was key in allowing me to complete this study. I would like to thank Nakon Aroonsakool and the rest of the Insel Lab for all the help and encouragement they have given me over the past two years. Most importantly, I would like to thank my parents for their love, devotion, and incredible support throughout my years in graduate school. Finally, I would like to acknowledge and thank Julian Schroeder and Aaron Coleman for taking the time to serve on my thesis committee. ix ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Expression Profile and Activation of Components for a Novel Signaling Module Mediating EGFR Transactivation by Rebecca Marrie Lynch Master of Science in Biology University of California, San Diego, 2015 Paul A. Insel, Chair Julian Schroder, Co-Chair Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediates the transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent signaling pathways, yet the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not fully understood. EGFR transactivation can occur via protease “shedding” of EGFR ligands (e.g., heparin-binding EGF [hb- EGF]) from the cell surface. Work in the Insel laboratory has shown the direct activation x of MT1-MMP (membrane type-1 matrix metalloprotease) via GPCRs and heterotrimeric G proteins and in support of the hypothesis that transactivation of EGFR might occur via components of a novel, membrane-associated signaling module (GPCR/MT1-MMP/HB- EGF/EGFR). In order to identify and quantify GPCRs that might regulate this proposed mechanism, I conducted targeted GPCR arrays using NIH 3T3 and HeLa cells. Next, I assessed the expression of the components in the putative signaling module by using whole cell lysates and isolated membranes from various cell types (NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, HeLa cells, and primary rat cardiac myocytes). I found that these signaling components localize to the plasma membrane and that bradykinin, a GPCR agonist, can activate EGFR in isolated HeLa cell membranes. This response was attenuated by AG1478, an inhibitor of EGFR, and by Peptide G, a selective inhibitor of MT1-MMP. Taken together, these findings provide evidence in support of the hypothesis that components of a plasma membrane-delimited signaling module that mediates EGFR transactivation can be activated by GPCR stimulation. Because over-activation of EGFR has been implicated in a variety of disease states, such as the progression of cancer and cardiovascular disease, further understanding of this mechanism may lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. xi Chapter 1. Introduction: 1.1 G Protein-Coupled Receptors G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane signaling receptors, with 900 GPCRs encoded by the human genome (1). These receptors are involved in a large number of physiological responses, from transduction of vision, taste, and smell, to regulation of the immune system, cardiovascular system, and digestive tract. GPCRs have a variety of ligands, including light, odorants, neurotransmitters, hormones, ions, and
Recommended publications
  • Development and Maintenance of Epidermal Stem Cells in Skin Adnexa
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Development and Maintenance of Epidermal Stem Cells in Skin Adnexa Jaroslav Mokry * and Rishikaysh Pisal Medical Faculty, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020; Published: 20 December 2020 Abstract: The skin surface is modified by numerous appendages. These structures arise from epithelial stem cells (SCs) through the induction of epidermal placodes as a result of local signalling interplay with mesenchymal cells based on the Wnt–(Dkk4)–Eda–Shh cascade. Slight modifications of the cascade, with the participation of antagonistic signalling, decide whether multipotent epidermal SCs develop in interfollicular epidermis, scales, hair/feather follicles, nails or skin glands. This review describes the roles of epidermal SCs in the development of skin adnexa and interfollicular epidermis, as well as their maintenance. Each skin structure arises from distinct pools of epidermal SCs that are harboured in specific but different niches that control SC behaviour. Such relationships explain differences in marker and gene expression patterns between particular SC subsets. The activity of well-compartmentalized epidermal SCs is orchestrated with that of other skin cells not only along the hair cycle but also in the course of skin regeneration following injury. This review highlights several membrane markers, cytoplasmic proteins and transcription factors associated with epidermal SCs. Keywords: stem cell; epidermal placode; skin adnexa; signalling; hair pigmentation; markers; keratins 1. Epidermal Stem Cells as Units of Development 1.1. Development of the Epidermis and Placode Formation The embryonic skin at very early stages of development is covered by a surface ectoderm that is a precursor to the epidermis and its multiple derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Evidence for a Central Epinephrine-Innervated A1- Adrenergic System That Regulates Behavioral Activation and Is Impaired in Depression
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1387–1399 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/03 $25.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Perspective Emerging Evidence for a Central Epinephrine-Innervated a1- Adrenergic System that Regulates Behavioral Activation and is Impaired in Depression ,1 1 1 1 1 Eric A Stone* , Yan Lin , Helen Rosengarten , H Kenneth Kramer and David Quartermain 1Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Currently, most basic and clinical research on depression is focused on either central serotonergic, noradrenergic, or dopaminergic neurotransmission as affected by various etiological and predisposing factors. Recent evidence suggests that there is another system that consists of a subset of brain a1B-adrenoceptors innervated primarily by brain epinephrine (EPI) that potentially modulates the above three monoamine systems in parallel and plays a critical role in depression. The present review covers the evidence for this system and includes findings that brain a -adrenoceptors are instrumental in behavioral activation, are located near the major monoamine cell groups 1 or target areas, receive EPI as their neurotransmitter, are impaired or inhibited in depressed patients or after stress in animal models, and a are restored by a number of antidepressants. This ‘EPI- 1 system’ may therefore represent a new target system for this disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1387–1399, advance online publication, 18 June 2003; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300222 Keywords: a1-adrenoceptors; epinephrine; motor activity; depression; inactivity INTRODUCTION monoaminergic systems. This new system appears to be impaired during stress and depression and thus may Depressive illness is currently believed to result from represent a new target for this disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list Citation for published version: Davenport, AP, Alexander, SPH, Sharman, JL, Pawson, AJ, Benson, HE, Monaghan, AE, Liew, WC, Mpamhanga, CP, Bonner, TI, Neubig, RR, Pin, JP, Spedding, M & Harmar, AJ 2013, 'International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands', Pharmacological reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 967-86. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1124/pr.112.007179 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Pharmacological reviews Publisher Rights Statement: U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1521-0081/65/3/967–986$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 65:967–986, July 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • General Discussion
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) EGF-TM7 receptors: A diverse and still evolving family of receptors on the leukocyte surface Matmati, M. Publication date 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Matmati, M. (2008). EGF-TM7 receptors: A diverse and still evolving family of receptors on the leukocyte surface. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:23 Sep 2021 Chapter 6 General Discussion GENERAL DISCUSSION Since their identification, starting about 15 years ago, a growing amount of data has accumulated about the structure, the expression, the ligands and, more recently, also the functional implications of EGF-TM7 receptors. Studies with antibody treatment and gene targeting in mice and antibody treatment of human cells in vitro, led to the implication of EGF-TM7 receptors in the trafficking of granulocytes, the generation of efferent antigen specific regulatory T cells and the potentiation of different granulocyte effector functions [1-4].
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Data
    Supplemental Data A novel mouse model of X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: Phenotypic analysis and therapeutic implications Jian Hua Li, Chung-Lin Chou, Bo Li, Oksana Gavrilova, Christoph Eisner, Jürgen Schnermann, Stasia A. Anderson, Chu-Xia Deng, Mark A. Knepper, and Jürgen Wess Supplemental Methods Metabolic cage studies. Animals were maintained in mouse metabolic cages (Hatteras Instruments, Cary, NC) under controlled temperature and light conditions (12 hr light and dark cycles). Mice received a fixed daily ration of 6.5 g of gelled diet per 20 g of body weight per day. The gelled diet was composed of 4 g of Basal Diet 5755 (Test Diet, Richmond, IN), 2.5 ml of deionized water, and 65 mg agar. Preweighted drinking water was provided ad libitum during the course of the study. Mice were acclimated in the metabolic cages for 1-2 days. Urine was collected under mineral oil in preweighted collection vials for successive 24 hr periods. Analysis of GPCR expression in mouse IMCD cells via TaqMan real-time qRT-PCR. Total RNA prepared from mouse IMCD tubule suspensions was reverse transcribed as described under Experimental Procedures. Tissues from ten 10-week old C57BL/6 WT mice were collected and pooled for each individual experiment. cDNA derived from 640 ng of RNA was mixed with an equal volume of TaqMan gene expression 2 x master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). 100 μl-aliquots of this mixture (corresponding to 80 ng of RNA) were added to each of the 8 fill ports of a 384-well plate of a mouse GPCR array panel (Applied Biosystems).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Dissection of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Signaling and Oligomerization
    MOLECULAR DISSECTION OF G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR SIGNALING AND OLIGOMERIZATION BY MICHAEL RIZZO A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology December, 2019 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Advisor Wayne E. Pratt, Ph.D. Chair Pat C. Lord, Ph.D. Gloria K. Muday, Ph.D. Ke Zhang, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. Erik Johnson, for his support, expertise, and leadership during my time in his lab. Without him, the work herein would not be possible. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Gloria Muday, Dr. Ke Zhang, Dr. Wayne Pratt, and Dr. Pat Lord, for their guidance and advice that helped improve the quality of the research presented here. I would also like to thank members of the Johnson lab, both past and present, for being valuable colleagues and friends. I would especially like to thank Dr. Jason Braco, Dr. Jon Fisher, Dr. Jake Saunders, and Becky Perry, all of whom spent a great deal of time offering me advice, proofreading grants and manuscripts, and overall supporting me through the ups and downs of the research process. Finally, I would like to thank my family, both for instilling in me a passion for knowledge and education, and for their continued support. In particular, I would like to thank my wife Emerald – I am forever indebted to you for your support throughout this process, and I will never forget the sacrifices you made to help me get to where I am today.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradykinin Receptor Deficiency Or Antagonism Do Not Impact the Host
    Ding et al. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (2019) 7:14 Intensive Care Medicine https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0228-3 Experimental RESEARCH Open Access Bradykinin receptor deficiency or antagonism do not impact the host response during gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis Chao Ding1,2, Jack Yang2, Cornelis van’t Veer2 and Tom van der Poll2,3* * Correspondence: t.vanderpoll@ amc.uva.nl Abstract 2Center of Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Academic Background: Kinins are short peptides with a wide range of proinflammatory Medical Center, University of properties that are generated from kininogens in the so-called kallikrein-kinin system. Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Room Kinins exert their biological activities through stimulation of two distinct receptor G2-130, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands subtypes, the kinin or bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors (B1R, B2R). Acute challenge 3Division of Infectious Diseases, models have implicated B1R and B2R in the pathogenesis of sepsis. However, their Academic Medical Center, role in the host response during sepsis originating from the lung is not known. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Results: To determine the role of B1R and B2R in pneumonia-derived sepsis, B1R/ Full list of author information is B2R-deficient mice and wild-type mice treated with the B1R antagonist R-715 or the available at the end of the article B2R antagonist HOE-140 were studied after infection with the common gram- negative pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae via the airways. Neither B1R/B2R deficiency nor B1R or B2R inhibition influenced bacterial growth at the primary site of infection or dissemination to distant body sites.
    [Show full text]
  • An Explanation of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Structure
    Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapeutics Review Article Open Access Role of GPCRS towards cell: an explanation of g-protein coupled receptor structure Abstract Volume 2 Issue 3 - 2017 G- protein coupled receptors are the heptahelical, serpentine receptor and are Nidhi Sharma,1 Anil Kumar Sahdev,2 Vinit Raj2 multifunctional receptors having modulatory activity of a wide variety of biological 1Dr. K. N. Modi Institute of Pharmacy & Research centre, process including: Neurotransmission, Chemoattraction, Cardiac function, Olfaction Modinagar, India. and Vision etc. At largest level they are involved in signal transduction across cell 2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao membranes therefore they represent major targets in the development of novel drug Ambedkar University, India candidates in all clinical areas. Particularly membrane cholesterol has been reported to have a great role in the functioning of a number of GPCRs. Apart from this it also Correspondence: Vinit Raj, Department of Pharmaceutical have some drawbacks. Mutations that occur are associated with a broad spectrum of Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, VidyaVihar, diseases of diverse etiology. As a mutations result, there is a change in receptor activity Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow-226025, Email [email protected] (GPCR become inactive, overactive, or constitutively active), in the process of ligand binding and signal transduction. Changes in the GPCRs functioning can cause diseases Received: January 31, 2017 | Published: March 27, 2017 such as retinitis pigmentosa (rhodopsin mutations), nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (vasopressin receptor mutations), and obesity (melanocortin receptor mutations). Keywords: gpcrs, serpentine receptor, neurotransmission, retinitis pigmentosa, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, bardet-biedl syndrome, hypogonadism Introduction deliver a message and appropriate cellular and physiological response1,2 (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic Analysis of Native Versus Cultured Human and Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglia Focused on Pharmacological Targets Short
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/766865; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Transcriptomic analysis of native versus cultured human and mouse dorsal root ganglia focused on pharmacological targets Short title: Comparative transcriptomics of acutely dissected versus cultured DRGs Andi Wangzhou1, Lisa A. McIlvried2, Candler Paige1, Paulino Barragan-Iglesias1, Carolyn A. Guzman1, Gregory Dussor1, Pradipta R. Ray1,#, Robert W. Gereau IV2, # and Theodore J. Price1, # 1The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, 800 W Campbell Rd. Richardson, TX, 75080, USA 2Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine # corresponding authors [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] Funding: NIH grants T32DA007261 (LM); NS065926 and NS102161 (TJP); NS106953 and NS042595 (RWG). The authors declare no conflicts of interest Author Contributions Conceived of the Project: PRR, RWG IV and TJP Performed Experiments: AW, LAM, CP, PB-I Supervised Experiments: GD, RWG IV, TJP Analyzed Data: AW, LAM, CP, CAG, PRR Supervised Bioinformatics Analysis: PRR Drew Figures: AW, PRR Wrote and Edited Manuscript: AW, LAM, CP, GD, PRR, RWG IV, TJP All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/766865; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in Cancer
    Oncogene (2010) 29, 5346–5358 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer J Stagg and MJ Smyth Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is actively released in the mulated the hypothesis of purinergic neurotransmission extracellular environment in response to tissue damage (Burnstock, 1972). Burnstock’s hypothesis that ATP and cellular stress. Through the activation of P2X and could be released by cells to perform intercellular P2Y receptors, extracellular ATP enhances tissue repair, signaling was initially met with skepticism, as it seemed promotes the recruitment of immune phagocytes and unlikely that a molecule that acts as an intracellular dendritic cells, and acts as a co-activator of NLR family, source of energy would also function as an extracellular pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes. messenger. Nevertheless, Burnstock pursued his work The conversion of extracellular ATP to adenosine, in and, together with Che Su and John Bevan, reported contrast, essentially through the enzymatic activity of the that ATP was also released from sympathetic nerves ecto-nucleotidases CD39 and CD73, acts as a negative- during stimulation (Su et al., 1971). Three decades later, feedback mechanism to prevent excessive immune responses. following the cloning and characterization of ATP and Here we review the effects of extracellular ATP and adenosine adenosine cell surface receptors, purinergic signaling is a on tumorigenesis. First, we summarize the functions of well-established concept and constitutes an expanding extracellular ATP and adenosine in the context of tumor field of research in health and disease, including cancer immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • P2Y Purinergic Receptors, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Cardiovascular Diseases
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review P2Y Purinergic Receptors, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Cardiovascular Diseases Derek Strassheim 1, Alexander Verin 2, Robert Batori 2 , Hala Nijmeh 3, Nana Burns 1, Anita Kovacs-Kasa 2, Nagavedi S. Umapathy 4, Janavi Kotamarthi 5, Yash S. Gokhale 5, Vijaya Karoor 1, Kurt R. Stenmark 1,3 and Evgenia Gerasimovskaya 1,3,* 1 The Department of Medicine Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research Laboratory, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (N.B.); [email protected] (V.K.); [email protected] (K.R.S.) 2 Vascular Biology Center, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (A.K.-K.) 3 The Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] 4 Center for Blood Disorders, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] 5 The Department of BioMedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (Y.S.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-303-724-5614 Received: 25 August 2020; Accepted: 15 September 2020; Published: 18 September 2020 Abstract: Purinergic G-protein-coupled receptors are ancient and the most abundant group of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The wide distribution of purinergic receptors in the cardiovascular system, together with the expression of multiple receptor subtypes in endothelial cells (ECs) and other vascular cells demonstrates the physiological importance of the purinergic signaling system in the regulation of the cardiovascular system.
    [Show full text]