Comparison of Several Brassica Species in the North Central U.S. For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparison of Several Brassica Species in the North Central U.S. For Industrial Crops and Products 75 (2015) 2–7 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Industrial Crops and Products jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/indcrop Comparison of several Brassica species in the north central U.S. for ଝ potential jet fuel feedstock a,∗ b b c d e f R.W. Gesch , T.A. Isbell , E.A. Oblath , B.L. Allen , D.W. Archer , J. Brown , J.L. Hatfield , c g h i J.D. Jabro , J.R. Kiniry , D.S. Long , M.F. Vigil a USDA-ARS-NCSCRL, Morris, MN, USA b USDA-ARS-NCAUR, Peoria, IL, USA c USDA-ARS-NPARL, Sidney, MT 59270, USA d USDA-ARS-NGPRL, Mandan, ND 58554, USA e University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 USA f USDA-ARS-NLAE, Ames, IA 50011, USA g USDA-ARS-GSWRL, Temple, TX 76502, USA h USDA-ARS-CPCRC, Pendleton, OR 97801, USA i USDA-ARS-CGPRL, Akron, CO 80720, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Hydrotreated renewable jet fuel (HRJ) derived from crop oils has been commercially demonstrated, but Received 28 January 2015 full-scale production has been hindered by feedstock costs that make it more costly than petroleum- Received in revised form 1 May 2015 based fuels. Maintaining low feedstock costs while developing crops attractive to growers will be key Accepted 4 May 2015 to producing affordable HRJ and creating a dependable supply. Several Brassica oilseed species could Available online 8 July 2015 potentially serve as feedstock, but genotypes agronomically and economically well suited for a given region will likely vary with environment and current cropping systems. The objectives of this study Keywords: were to evaluate seed and seed oil yields of 12 summer annual Brassica genotypes representing six Brassicaceae different species [Brassica napus L., Brassica rapa L., Brassica juncea L., Brassica carinata L., Sinapis alba L., Hydrotreated renewable jet fuel Oilseeds and Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz.] and identify environmental factors that might limit their growth and Seed yield oil production. The study was conducted during 2013 and 2014 in west central Minnesota, U.S. on a Oil yield Barnes loam soil. This study is part of a larger project focused on evaluating the same set of oilseeds across the major wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growing areas of the U.S. Seed yields for the 12 spring- −1 −1 sown crops in Minnesota ranged from 1058 to 3718 kg ha in 2013 and 515 to 2020 kg ha in 2014. The −1 −1 range in seed oil yield was 287–1588 kg ha in 2013 and 210–885 kg ha in 2014. Plant lodging was a serious issue in 2013, but it varied widely among genotypes. In 2014, which was characterized by an abnormally wet spring, disease infection {most likely white leaf spot [Pseudocercosporella capsellae (Ellis & Everh.) Deighton 1973]} and flea beetle [Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze)] feeding led to plant damage, but these were primarily confined to certain Brassica napus cultivars. In west central Minnesota, certain B. napus canola lines and B. carinata produced the greatest seed and oil yields. B. carinata was the latest maturing species in the study, produced the highest biomass, and tended to have low harvest indices, indicating ample room for yield improvement. For any given ecoregion, striking a balance among crop yield, agricultural input costs, and optimum species/cultivar choice for a particular cropping system will be important for providing a reliable and affordable feedstock for HRJ. Published by Elsevier B.V. ଝ Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ∗ Corresponding author at: USDA-ARS-NCSCRL, 803 Iowa Ave, Morris, MN 56267, USA. Fax: +1 320 589 3787. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (R.W. Gesch), [email protected] (T.A. Isbell), [email protected] (E.A. Oblath), [email protected] (B.L. Allen), [email protected] (D.W. Archer), [email protected] (J. Brown), jerry.hatfi[email protected] (J.L. Hatfield), [email protected] (J.D. Jabro), [email protected] (J.R. Kiniry), [email protected] (D.S. Long), [email protected] (M.F. Vigil). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.05.084 0926-6690/Published by Elsevier B.V. R.W. Gesch et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 75 (2015) 2–7 3 Table 1 1. Introduction Description of the Brassica genotypes used in the study. Hydrotreated renewable jet fuel (HRJ) derived from crop oils has Specie Cultivar †Oil type Growth habit been commercially demonstrated. In addition, American Society Brassica napus DK3042 RR Canola Spring for Testing and Materials standards (ASTM) have been developed Brassica napus Gem Industrial Spring for HRJ fuel and since 2011 it has been approved for commercial Brassica napus Invigor L130 Canola Spring Brassica napus SC28 Canola Spring aviation use. Nevertheless, full-scale production of HRJ has yet to Brassica rapa Eclipse Canola Spring be demonstrated, primary because it is not yet cost competitive Brassica juncea Oasis Canola Spring with petroleum-based fuels. The majority of the cost for producing Brassica juncea Pacific Gold Industrial Spring biofuels from plant-derived oils is the cost of producing the feed- Brassica carinata AAC A110 Industrial Spring Brassica carinata 080814 EM Industrial Spring stock itself, which can represent 80% or more of the total biofuel Camelina sativa CO46 Industrial Spring production cost (Demirbas, 2006). Sinapis alba Idagold Industrial Spring A strong commitment by the commercial aviation industry and Sinapis alba Tilney Industrial Spring the U.S. Department of Defense exists for advancing HRJ and other † Oil type refers to whether the seed oil is food grade (Canola) or industrial grade drop-in alternative fuels. For instance, the commercial aviation (Industrial), which is high in euricic acid and glucosinolates. industry has set a goal of carbon neutral growth by 2020 and reduc- ing petroleum jet fuel use 50% by 2050 (IATA, 2009). Because there (Pavlista et al., 2011). The primary wheat growing regions of the U.S. are few renewable fuels options for aviation use, agriculture is faced include the Pacific Northwest, northern Great Plains, and Central with an excellent opportunity to fill this niche with the produc- Plains regions (USDA-NASS, 2015). The present study was con- tion of industrial oilseed crops (Fishel et al., 2011). Ultimately, the ducted in west central Minnesota, which is located on the eastern reduction in the cost of producing HRJ will likely come from reduc- edge of the northern Great Plains region. The objectives of the study ing costs at multiple stages along the entire biofuel supply chain. were to evaluate seed and seed oil yields of 12 summer annual Bras- However, lowering feedstock production costs presently allows the sicaceae genotypes representing six different species and assess greatest amount of room for improvement. Reducing feedstock environmental effects on plant growth and yield. This study is part costs while developing crops attractive to farmers will be key to of a larger project encompassing eight experimental locations dis- producing affordable HRJ and creating a dependable feedstock sup- ply. tributed across the primary wheat growing regions of the U.S. that are evaluating the same set of Brassica genotypes. Other important factors to consider in developing affordable HRJ We envision that no one agricultural region, or for that matter include selecting suitable oilseed feedstock that minimize compe- oilseed genotype, will meet all the feedstock requirements for HRJ tition for food and feed production (Johnson et al., 2007), while production, and further hypothesize that the highest yielding or also fitting well into present cropping systems to promote envi- best performing genotype(s) will differ across regions. Maintaining ronmental and economic sustainability. Several species from the adequate feedstock supply to sustain the future needs of the avia- Brassicaceae (mustard) family can serve as feedstock for HRJ, and tion industry will likely require a portfolio of oilseed choices and some such as Brassica napus are already being used for biodiesel diversity of growing environments. manufacturing in several countries. Moreover, research indicates Brassica oilseed crops provide many rotational benefits when used as a “break” or rotational crop in small grain cropping systems, 2. Materials and methods especially those emphasizing wheat production (Kirkegaard et al., 2008). Benefits of rotating Brassica oilseeds in small grain sys- 2.1. Cultural practices tems include improved soil structure (Chan and Heenan, 1996), increased yields and protein content of wheat (Gan et al., 2003), The present study was conducted during the growing seasons of improved soil N cycling (Ryan et al., 2006), and reduced pathogen 2013 and 2014 at the USDA-ARS Swan Lake Research Farm located ◦ ◦ incidence (Kirkegaard et al., 2008). Although more effort has gone near Morris, Minnesota (45 35 N, 95 54 W; 344 m elevation). The into the research and development of B. napus and Brassica juncea soil was a Barnes loam soil (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid for food and industrial use, other Brassicaceae relatives such as Calcic Hapludoll). Soil samples from the study area were taken camelina, Brassica carinata, and Sinapis alba also show promise as in the spring prior to sowing. In the top 60 cm of the soil profile, potential HRJ feedstocks. the pH ranged from 7.8 to 8.6, total inorganic and organic carbon −1 These alternative crops have attributes that may make them ranged from 18.4 to 43.0 g kg , and total nitrogen ranged from 0.7 −1 more suitable as biofuel feedstock for a given agricultural region to 2.3 g kg .
Recommended publications
  • Spring Camelina Production Guide 2009 DEC.Indd
    SPRING CAMELINA PRODUCTION GUIDE For the Central High Plains December 2009 Central High Plains Produced by Blue Sun Energy with the support of Advancing Colorado’s Renewable Energy (ACRE) Ryan M. Lafferty, Charlie Rife and Gus Foster 1 2 INTRODUCTION Camelina, [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz, Brassicaceae] This document is available for purchase at the AAFCO is an old world crop newly introduced to the semiarid west of website. Research is ongoing and increased feeding levels the United States. Camelina is promising new spring-sown are expected to be established in the future. rotation crop due to its excellent seedling frost tolerance, a short production cycle (60-90 days) and resistance to flea Camelina is adapted to marginal growing conditions. beetles. Camelina has a high oil content (~35% oil) and Preliminary water use efficiency research conducted in improved drought tolerance and water use efficiency (yield Akron, CO at the Great Plains Research Center indicates that vs. evapotranspiration (ET)) when compared to other oilseed it has the highest water use efficiency of the tested oilseed crops. crops (canola, juncea, and sunflowers). Camelina is planted early spring (March) and is harvested in early to mid July. Camelina is a member of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) Camelina is adapted (low-water use and short production family. Brassicaceae is comprised of about 350 genera and cycle) to fit into the winter wheat based crop rotation systems 3000 species. Important crops in this family include canola/ of the semiarid (10-15 inches precipitation) High Plains. rapeseed, (Brassica napus and B. rapa); mustards, (B. juncea; Sinapus alba; B.
    [Show full text]
  • Camelina Sativa, a Montana Omega-3 and Fuel Crop* Alice L
    Reprinted from: Issues in new crops and new uses. 2007. J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA. Camelina sativa, A Montana Omega-3 and Fuel Crop* Alice L. Pilgeram, David C. Sands, Darrin Boss, Nick Dale, David Wichman, Peggy Lamb, Chaofu Lu, Rick Barrows, Mathew Kirkpatrick, Brian Thompson, and Duane L. Johnson Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz, (Brassicaceae), commonly known as false flax, leindotter and gold of pleasure, is a fall or spring planted annual oilcrop species (Putman et al. 1993). This versatile crop has been cultivated in Europe since the Bronze Age. Camelina seed was found in the stomach of Tollund man, a 4th century BCE mummy recovered from a peat bog in Denmark (Glob 1969). Anthropologists postulate that the man’s last meal had been a soup made from vegetables and seeds including barley, linseed, camelina, knotweed, bristle grass, and chamomile. The Romans used camelina oil as massage oil, lamp fuel, and cooking oil, as well as the meal for food or feed. Camelina, like many Brassicaceae, germinates and emerges in the early spring, well before most cereal grains. Early emergence has several advantages for dryland production including efficient utiliza- tion of spring moisture and competitiveness with common weeds. In response to the resurgent interest in oil crops for sustainable biofuel production, the Montana State Uni- versity (MSU) Agricultural Research Centers have conducted a multi-year, multi-specie oilseed trial. This trial included nine different oilseed crops (sunflower, safflower, soybean, rapeseed, mustard, flax, crambe, canola, and camelina). Camelina sativa emerged from this trial as a promising oilseed crop for production across Montana and the Northern Great Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Mutant Camelina and Jatropha As Valuable Feedstocks for Biodiesel
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Novel mutant camelina and jatropha as valuable feedstocks for biodiesel production Muhammad Mahran Aslam1, Asif Ali Khan1,2, Hafza Masooma Naseer Cheema1, Muhammad Asif Hanif3*, Muhammad Waqar Azeem3 & Muhammad Abubakkar Azmat4 Novel mutant camelina has become a crop of interest inspired by its short growing season, low harvesting costs and high oil composition. Despite those advantages, limited research has been done on novel mutant lines to determine applicability for biodiesel production. Jatropha is an extremely hardy, frugal and high oil yielding plant species. The major aim of the present study was not only to compare biodiesel production from jatropha and camelina but was also to test the efcacy of camelina mutant lines (M6 progenies) as superior feedstock. The biodiesel yield from camelina oil and jatropha oil was 96% and 92%, respectively. The gas chromatographic analysis using fame ionization detector (GC-FID) showed that mutant camelina oil biodiesel sample contain major amount of oleic acid (46.54 wt%) followed by linolenic acid (20.41 wt%) and linoleic acid (16.55 wt%). Jatropha biodiesel found to contain major amount of oleic acid (45.03 wt%) followed by linoleic acid (25.07 wt%) and palmitic acid (19.31 wt%). The fuel properties of produced biodiesel were found in good agreement with EN14214 and ASTM D6751 standards. The mutant camelina lines biodiesel have shown comparatively better fuel properties than jatropha. It has shown low saponifcation value (120.87–149.35), high iodine value (130.2–157.9) and better cetane number (48.53–59.35) compared to jatropha biodiesel which have high saponifcation value (177.39–198.9), low iodine value (109.7– 123.1) and lesser cetane number (47.76–51.26).
    [Show full text]
  • Camelina Sativa L. Crantz) Genotypes in Response to Sowing Date Under Mediterranean Environment
    agronomy Article Performance and Potentiality of Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Genotypes in Response to Sowing Date under Mediterranean Environment Luciana G. Angelini , Lara Abou Chehade , Lara Foschi and Silvia Tavarini * Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (L.G.A.); [email protected] (L.A.C.); [email protected] (L.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 November 2020; Accepted: 5 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: Given the growing interest for camelina, as a multipurpose oilseed crop, seven cultivars and two sowing times were compared to characterize camelina’s production potential in the rainfed agroecosystems of Central Italy. A split-plot design, with sowing date as main plot (autumn and spring) and cultivar (V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, and CELINE) as subplot, was adopted over two growing seasons (2017–2019). Phenology, yield and yield components, protein and oil content, and fatty acid profile were evaluated. Going from autumn to spring sowing, a significant reduction was observed in the number of days (139 vs. 54 days) and GDD (642 vs. 466 ◦C d) from emergence to beginning of flowering, with more consistent variations among cultivars. V1 and V2 were the earlier ones both in spring and autumn sowing. Autumn sowing increased seed yield (+18.0%), TSW (+4.1%), number of siliques per plant (+47.2%), contents of α-linolenic, eicosenoic, erucic and eicosadienoic acids, and polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio. Regarding genotype, V3 showed the best seed and oil yield in autumn, whereas V1 and CELINE were the best performing in spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Carinata, the Sustainable Crop for a Bio-Based Economy: 2018–2019 Production Recommendations for the Southeastern United States1 R
    SS-AGR-384 Carinata, the Sustainable Crop for a Bio-based Economy: 2018–2019 Production Recommendations for the Southeastern United States1 R. Seepaul, I. M. Small, M. J. Mulvaney, S. George, R. G. Leon, S. V. Paula-Moraes, D. Geller, J. J. Marois, and D. L. Wright2 Brassica carinata (carinata) is an oilseed crop with potential for profitable cultivation in the southeastern US. Its high oil content and favorable fatty acid profile make it suitable for the biofuel industry as a biojet fuel. The UF/IFAS North Florida Research and Education Center (NFREC) in Quincy, Florida has been working to identify advanced carinata varieties that are high-yielding (seed and oil), disease-resistant, early-maturing, and adapted to south- eastern US. The work at NFREC is in conjunction with Agrisoma Biosciences Inc., a private sector partner with the world’s largest, most advanced carinata breeding program. Agrisoma is developing varieties for global commercializa- tion including southern US, the northern prairie states, southern Canada, South America, Europe and Australia. Figure 1. From field to flight. Credits: David Wright, UF/IFAS (field, seed); Thinkstock (oil); ARA (plane) 1. This document is SS-AGR-384, one of a series of the Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date December 2014. Revised October 2015, December 2018, and January 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. This research is supported by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Office of Energy grant SRD007 and focuses on the development of best management practices, demonstration of commercial potential, and feasibility of the presscake as a feedstuff.
    [Show full text]
  • '4B Brassica' Crops for Biodiesel, Better Soils, Break Crops and Better
    New Brassica oilseed crops: ‘4B Brassica’ crops for Biodiesel, Better soils, Break crops and Better wheat Julie A. Plummer School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The ‘4B Brassica’ Crop program is a collaborative project between the University of Western Australia, the Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia and key industry partners. This is a new approach to oilseed breeding in response to growing world demand for biodiesel. Our aim is to exploit for biodiesel production, the underutilized mustard species Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) and B. carinata (Ethiopian mustard) to develop a new ‘4B- Brassica’ that combines the resilience of mustard species in high stress environments with the oil producing capacity of B. napus. ‘4B Brassica’ crops for Biodiesel, Better Soils, Break Crop and Better Wheat will provide an exciting new industry for regional Australia with low inputs and high oil yield under low rainfall conditions. Rapid breeding techniques will accelerate selection for drought tolerance, blackleg resistance, high seed yield and oil content. Seed meal can be recycled as fertilizer, and glycerine as a soil wetting agent. This provides a crop that better utilises available rainfall, transforms existing resource-based industries, improves soil quality, recycles carbon, reduces emissions, and addresses climate change. Key words: Biodiesel, Breeding, Seed meal INTRODUCTION The cost of energy worldwide is increasing. In the last ten years, the price of crude oil has reached as high as $74/barrel and the long-term forecast is for further price increases as world oil reserves are progressively depleted.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Producing Dryland Camelina in Eastern Colorado Fact Sheet No
    Guide for Producing Dryland Camelina in Eastern Colorado Fact Sheet No. 0.709 Crop Series|Production J.N. Enjalbert and J.J. Johnson* Camelina is an annual crop with small • Camelina meal contains Quick Facts seed that has been cultivated in Europe approximately 40% protein, is high for more than a thousand years. Eastern in Omega-3 fatty acid content, • Eastern Colorado’s wheat- Colorado’s wheat-based, cropping system and low in erucic acid content and based, cropping system covers more than 4 million acres and spring- glucosinolates. covers more than 4 million planted camelina would fit well into a dryland acres and spring-planted crop rotation. Camelina is a short, relatively Potential problems for camelina would fit well into a shallow-rooted, short-season, crop requiring dryland crop rotation. 85 to 100 days from emergence to maturity. growing dryland spring The seed contains approximately 30–35% oil camelina in eastern • Unlike spring canola and and can produce 40 or more gallons per acre Colorado Indian brown mustard, of clean vegetable oil and potentially 900 lb/ac • The primary production challenges camelina is tolerant of flea of high-protein animal meal. are stand establishment and weed beetles and other insects. control. • Camelina can be grown Potential benefits of growing • An effective weed control method is under tilled or no-till dryland to plant camelina in late winter/early dryland spring camelina in conditions. Excessive spring into a clean field. Camelina eastern Colorado crop residue can reduce can be planted from the end of • Camelina production requires the February to the first week of April in emergence so seeding rates same equipment as wheat.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination of Two Oilproducing Plant Species: Camelina (Camelina
    GCB Bioenergy (2013), doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12122 Pollination of two oil-producing plant species: Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) and pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.) double-cropping in Germany JANNA H. GROENEVELD* andALEXANDRA-MARIA KLEIN*† *Institute of Ecology, Ecosystem Functions, Leuphana University Luneburg,€ Scharnhorststr. 1, Luneburg€ 21335, Germany, †Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacherstr. 4, Freiburg 79106, Germany Abstract Camelina and pennycress are two annual oil-producing plant species that have recently gained attention as bio- fuel feedstock crops. Prior to commercial production, information on their breeding and pollination system is essential to ensure sustainable management. We conducted pollination experiments and observed flower visitors in an experimental double-cropping system in southern Germany. We found that common camelina varieties were mainly self-pollinated and yield of one variety seemed to benefit from insect visitation, whereas penny- cress was predominantly wind pollinated. Camelina showed higher overall visitation rates by insects than pen- nycress. Flies and wild bees visited both crop species, but honey bees visited camelina only. We conclude that both oil crop species produce yield without pollinators but offer foraging resources for different insect taxa at times when few other crops and native plants are flowering. Keywords: biofuels, Brassicaceae, breeding system, ecological sustainability, ecosystem services, honey bees, wild bees Received 22 December 2012; revised version received 17 July 2013 and accepted 31 July 2013 proven suitable for biodiesel (Moser et al., 2009; Moser, Introduction 2010) and biokerosene production (Shonnard et al., Nowadays agriculture not only provides goods for 2010). Other applications are in the cosmetic, biolubri- human food consumption but also feedstock for the bio- cant, and in the culinary sector (the last for camelina energy sector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Feedstock Partnership: Herbaceous Energy Crops and CRP Land for Biomass Production
    The Regional Feedstock Partnership: Herbaceous Energy Crops and CRP Land for Biomass Production 20-23 May 2013 Feedstock Supply and Logistics Peer Review Vance N. Owens South Dakota State University Goal/Objectives . Development of more accurate cost supply information and improved communication with partners in the biomass feedstock supply chain . Replicated field trials across regions to determine the impact of residue removal on future grain yield. Replicated field trials to develop energy crops within geographical regions. Regional assessment of feedstock resources which can be used to determine supply curves. Long term field data is the best and most direct way to determine commercial viability 20 May 2013 2013 Feedstock Platform Review 2 Quad Chart Overview Timeline Barriers • Project start date: 01/15/2007 • Ft-A: Resource availability and cost • Project end date: 09/30/2013 • Ft-B: Sustainable production • Percent complete: 80% • Ft-C: Crop genetics Budget Partners • Funding for FY11 • DOE: $1,150,637 • Collaborations: Sun Grant, DOE, USDA-ARS, Land-Grant • Cost share: $287,659 Universities, National Labs • Funding for FY12: $0 • Project management: • Funding for FY13: $0 Herbaceous lead, species leads, • Years the project has been field trial PIs funded/average annual funding • 6 years @ $755,512/yr 20 May 2013 2013 Feedstock Platform Review 3 Project Overview . Field trials initiated in 2008, or added later as needed, on multiple selected species . Development of regional and national yield estimates for sustainable biomass supply systems 20 May 2013 2013 Feedstock Platform Review 4 Presentation Outline . General Approach . Overall Technical Progress and Accomplishments . Species discussion . Energycane . CRP . Miscanthus . Switchgrass .
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern US 2017-18 Carinata Management Handbook
    Southeastern US 2017-18 Carinata Management Handbook Brassica carinata, or Carinata, is a non-GMO, renewable, oilseed crop grown globally for alternative biofuels and seed meal. Also called Ethiopian mustard, it prefers cooler weather, making it a suitable crop to grow during the winter months in the southeast US. Carinata grain has a high quality, non-food oil, making it an excellent choice for alternative biofuels. It is a certified, sustainable crop that fits into existing rotations. Carinata grain is approximately 45% oil, and the seed meal is approximately 43- 46% protein with a low fiber content. Currently, the seed meal is approved for beef cattle consumption in the US, and research is continuing for approvals for dairy, poultry, swine, and fish consumption. Besides potential additional revenue, growing Carinata as a winter crop also provides cover crop benefits. Carinata may help improve soil quality through recycling deeper soil nutrients, reducing erosion, and adding diversity to the rotation which helps with weed and disease control. Carinata biomass provides a thick ground cover after harvest, adding to soil organic matter and C sequestering. Carinata: Agronomic Profile Carinata offers good resistance to biotic stressors such as insects and disease, as well as abiotic stressors, such as heat, drought, and frost. Carinata is high in glucosinolates, an organic compound containing sulfur, therefore it may help fight against soil pests including nematodes. It is a vigorous crop with a highly branching growth pattern and large seed size relative to other Brassica crops. Carinata has excellent harvestability characteristics, such as lodging and pod shatter tolerance, which makes it an outstanding candidate for straight cutting.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages
    antioxidants Article Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile Francesco Gai 1 , Magdalena Karama´c 2,* , Michał A. Janiak 2 , Ryszard Amarowicz 2 and Pier Giorgio Peiretti 1 1 Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy; [email protected] (F.G.); [email protected] (P.G.P.) 2 Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] (M.A.J.); [email protected] (R.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-895-234-622 Received: 21 May 2020; Accepted: 17 June 2020; Published: 19 June 2020 Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the antioxidant activity and phenolic profile of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) extracts obtained from the aerial parts of plants harvested at five growth stages. In vitro assays were used to determine the antioxidant + activity, i.e., ABTS• and DPPH• scavenging activity, the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and the ability to inhibit β-carotene–linoleic acid emulsion oxidation. Phenolic compounds, such as mono- and dicaffeoylquinic acid isomers and caffeic acid hexose, were identified using the LC–TOF–MS/MS technique. The predominant compound during the growth cycle of the plant was 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid, whose content was the highest at the mid-flowering stage. The total phenolic content was also the highest in sunflowers at the mid-flowering stage. The main phenolic + compound contents were closely correlated with ABTS• and DPPH• scavenging activity and FRAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Brassica
    International Journal of AgriScience Vol. 3(6): 453-480, June 2013 www.inacj.com ISSN: 2228-6322© International Academic Journals The wild and the grown – remarks on Brassica Hammer K.¹*, Gladis Th.¹ , Laghetti G.² , Pignone D.² ¹Former Institute of Crop Science, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany. * Author for correspondence (email: [email protected]) ²CNR – Institute of Plant Genetics, Bari, Italy. Received mmmm yyyy; accepted in revised form mmmmm yyyy ABSTRACT Brassica is a genus of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae). The wild races are concentrated in the Mediterranean area with one species in CE Africa (Brassica somaliensis Hedge et A. Miller) and several weedy races reaching E Asia. Amphidiploid evolution is characteristic for the genus. The diploid species Brassica nigra (L.) Koch (n = 8), Brassica rapa L. emend. Metzg. (n = 10, syn.: B. campestris L.) and Brassica oleracea L. (n = 9) all show a rich variation under domestication. From the naturally occurring amphidiploids Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. (n = 18), Brassica napus L. emend. Metzg. (n = 19) and the rare Brassica carinata A. Braun (n = 17) also some vegetable races have developed. The man-made Brassica ×harmsiana O.E. Schulz (Brassica oleracea × Brassica rapa, n = 29, n = 39), or similar hybrids, serve also for the development of new vegetables. Brassica tournefortii Gouan (n = 10) from another Brassica- cytodeme, different from the Brassica rapa group, is occasionally grown as a vegetable in India. Brassica has developed two hotspots under cultivation, in the Mediterranean area and in E Asia. Cultivation by man has changed the different Brassica species in a characteristic way. The large amount of morphologic variation, which exceeded in many cases variations occurring in distinct wild species, has been observed by the classical botanists by adding these variations to their natural species by using Greek letters.
    [Show full text]