DOCSLIB.ORG

130-154A Pentonville Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
130-154A Pentonville Road planning report D&P/2924b/02 1 December 2014 130-154a Pentonville Road in the London Borough of Islington planning application no. P2014/1017/FUL Strategic planning application stage II referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Mixed-use redevelopment ranging in height from 4 to 10-storeys comprising 3,879 sq.m. commercial floorspace for a car hire company, 873 sq.m. of office floorspace and 118 residential units. The applicant The applicant is Groveworld Rodney Street Ltd, and the architect is Pollard Thomas Edwards. Strategic issues Outstanding issues in relation to affordable housing, residential density, energy and transport have been resolved satisfactorily. The Council’s decision In this instance Islington Council has resolved to grant permission. Recommendation That Islington Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 7 May 2014 the Mayor of London received documents from Islington Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Category 1C of the Schedule to the Order 2008: ”Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building more than 30 metres high and is outside of the City of London.” 2 On 17 June 2014 the Mayor considered planning report D&P/2924b/01, and subsequently advised Islington Council that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 67 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in that paragraph of the report could address these deficiencies. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are page 1 as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. Since then, the application has been revised in response to the Mayor’s concerns, as detailed below. On 11 November 2014 Islington Council decided that it was minded to grant planning permission for the application, and on 18 November 2014 it advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, direct Islington Council under Article 6 to refuse the application or issue a direction to Islington Council under Article 7 that he is to act as the Local Planning Authority for the purposes of determining the application and any connected application. The Mayor has until 1 December 2014 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction. 4 The decision on this case and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Update 5 The application was originally presented to Islington’s planning committee on 22 July 2014 where it was refused against the officer recommendation. The grounds for refusal were based on the scheme failing to intensify the level of on-site employment uses alongside issues with regards to the financial viability assessment. Council officers brought the application back to Islington’s planning committee on 11 November 2014 for further consideration as a concern was raised that the reasons for refusal were not matters pursued by the Council in reaching its decision on a previous application (reference PDU/2924a) for the same site, which was broadly similar in scope to the current application. The decision from the previous application subsequently went to appeal and the appeal was dismissed. 6 The officer’s committee report of 22 July 2014 did not make it sufficiently clear that the proposed employment offer had not changed in any material way between the current application and the appeal application. In addition, there has been no change in material circumstances or the policy situation which would lead committee members to take a contrary view on what is broadly a similar scheme. The appeal decision is recognised as a material consideration in the determination of the current application as although it found that the scheme would impact negatively on the amenity of neighbouring properties, it did provide clear agreement to other issues including affordable housing/viability and the employment offer. 7 At the consultation stage Islington Council was advised that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 67 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in that paragraph of the report could address these deficiencies: Affordable housing: The applicant is proposing to provide eleven family sized units for social rent, however details on the funding of social rented units have not been provided. The applicant has not assessed whether the proposal could provide more affordable units using the affordable rent product. As such is it not possible to ascertain whether the proposal complies with London Plan policies 3.11 and 3.12 of the London Plan. Density: In order to confirm whether the proposed density complies with policies 3.4 and 3.5 of the London Plan, clarification of the density is required. Urban design: The applicant has responded to concerns raised in relation to the previous iteration of the scheme, providing additional access points to residential cores. Issues raised in the inspector’s report in relation to overshadowing to Hill House have been successfully addressed through the massing reconfiguration of block E. This is welcomed. Energy: The applicant has broadly followed the energy hierarchy. Sufficient information has been provided to understand the proposals as a whole. The proposals are broadly acceptable; however, further information is required to ensure full compliance with the London Plan. The proposal includes living roofs, sustainable urban drainage and a page 2 rainwater harvesting system. As such the proposal complies with the climate change adaptation policies contained within chapter 4A of the London Plan. Transport: Further information is required as detailed in paragraphs 52 to 59 above to ensure the proposal complies with transport policies contained within chapter 3 of the London Plan. 8 In response to Stage One comments and further consultation with Council officers, further information has been provided as detailed below: Affordable housing 9 At the consultation stage, the applicant was advised to revisit the proposed tenure split of affordable housing provision and explore means of replacing the social rent offer with affordable rent to ascertain whether this would provide an improved affordable housing offer. In response, the applicant commissioned Gerald Eve to remodel the financial viability assessment based on affordable rent units, with rent set at 50% of market rent level. It was found that while this led to a degree of additional value, this was not deemed sufficient to enable additional affordable housing units to be provided. The amount of affordable provision therefore remains the same as commented on at the consultation stage and GLA officers recognise this as being the maximum reasonable amount, meeting the objectives of London Plan Policy 3.12. 10 As required in the Council’s SPD on planning obligations, a further financial viability appraisal should be submitted prior to the date of implementation of the development. It is understood that a clause has been included in the draft Section 106 agreement to secure this requirement. Density 11 The applicant has provided a revised calculation, taking into account the employment of floorspace, as requested at the consultation stage. This results in a net residential density of 1,004 habitable rooms per hectare, or 380 units per hectare. This sits within the prescribed range as defined in London Plan Table 3.3 for a development site in this highly accessible location and is supported from a strategic perspective. 12 As detailed at the initial consultation stage, the form and massing of the scheme has been amended to address concerns raised in the Inspector’s report in relation to the previous application. The amendments are supported from a strategic perspective and the proposals demonstrate a high quality of both detailed and contextual/townscape design, with key details conditioned by the Council. The scheme is therefore recognised as meeting the objectives of London Plan Policy 3.4 ‘Optimising housing potential’. Sustainable development/energy 13 At the initial consultation stage the applicant was requested to submit sample DER and TER sheets with full BRUKL sheets to support the projected reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. While it is disappointing this information has not been provided, it does not pose a significant strategic issue. 14 The applicant was advised to prioritise connection to the Euston Road district heating network, alongside providing evidence of correspondence with the network developer. This information has not been included in the application, however it is accepted that the district heating network is likely to be located too great a distance from the application site (820metres) and is of too small a scale to make an immediate connection feasible. It is also noted that a condition has been included requiring the development to be future proofed for connection. The Council is requested to include further detail in the wording of this condition (condition 20) to prioritise connection to existing networks before installing on-site combined heat and power (CHP). Notwithstanding this, the requirement to consider the use of temporary plant for an page 3 initial period until connection to a district heating network can be achieved, is addressed in the same condition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railways: Thameslink Infrastructure Project
    Railways: Thameslink infrastructure project Standard Note: SN1537 Last updated: 26 January 2012 Author: Louise Butcher Section Business and Transport This note describes the Thameslink infrastructure project, including information on how the scheme got off the ground, construction issues and the policy of successive government towards the project. It does not deal with the controversial Thameslink rolling project to purchase new trains to run on the route. This is covered in HC Library note SN3146. The re- let of the Thameslink passenger franchise is covered in SN1343, both available on the Railways topical page of the Parliament website. The Thameslink project involves electrification, signalling and new track works. This will increase capacity, reduce journey times and generally expand the current Thameslink route through central London and across the South East of England. On completion in 2018, up to 24 trains per hour will operate through central London, reducing the need for interchange onto London Underground services. The project dates back to the Conservative Government in the mid-1990s. It underwent a lengthy public inquiry process under the Labour Government and has been continued by the Coalition Government. However, the scheme will not be complete until 2018 – 14 years later than its supporters had hoped when the scheme was initially proposed. Contents 1 Where things stand: Thameslink in 2012 2 2 Scheme generation and development, 1995-2007 3 2.1 Transport and Works Act (TWA) Order application, 1997 5 2.2 Revised TWA Order application, 1999 6 2.3 Public Inquiry, 2000-2006 6 2.4 New Thameslink station at St Pancras 7 This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Central London Bus and Walking Map Key Bus Routes in Central London
    General A3 Leaflet v2 23/07/2015 10:49 Page 1 Transport for London Central London bus and walking map Key bus routes in central London Stoke West 139 24 C2 390 43 Hampstead to Hampstead Heath to Parliament to Archway to Newington Ways to pay 23 Hill Fields Friern 73 Westbourne Barnet Newington Kentish Green Dalston Clapton Park Abbey Road Camden Lock Pond Market Town York Way Junction The Zoo Agar Grove Caledonian Buses do not accept cash. Please use Road Mildmay Hackney 38 Camden Park Central your contactless debit or credit card Ladbroke Grove ZSL Camden Town Road SainsburyÕs LordÕs Cricket London Ground Zoo Essex Road or Oyster. Contactless is the same fare Lisson Grove Albany Street for The Zoo Mornington 274 Islington Angel as Oyster. Ladbroke Grove Sherlock London Holmes RegentÕs Park Crescent Canal Museum Museum You can top up your Oyster pay as Westbourne Grove Madame St John KingÕs TussaudÕs Street Bethnal 8 to Bow you go credit or buy Travelcards and Euston Cross SadlerÕs Wells Old Street Church 205 Telecom Theatre Green bus & tram passes at around 4,000 Marylebone Tower 14 Charles Dickens Old Ford Paddington Museum shops across London. For the locations Great Warren Street 10 Barbican Shoreditch 453 74 Baker Street and and Euston Square St Pancras Portland International 59 Centre High Street of these, please visit Gloucester Place Street Edgware Road Moorgate 11 PollockÕs 188 TheobaldÕs 23 tfl.gov.uk/ticketstopfinder Toy Museum 159 Russell Road Marble Museum Goodge Street Square For live travel updates, follow us on Arch British
    [Show full text]
  • 158-160 Pentonville Rd Committe Report
    Development Management Service PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT Planning and Development Division Environment and Regeneration Department Town Hall Upper Street LONDON N1 2UD PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM NO:1 Date: 23 April 2020 Application number P2019/2290/FUL Application type Full Planning Application Ward Barnsbury Listed building n/a Conservation area n/a Strategic Central Activities Zone Kings Cross & Pentonville Road Key Area Employment Growth Area Article 4 Direction – A1 (Retail) to A2 (Professional and Financial Services) Article 4 Direction – B1c (Light Industrial) to C3 (Residential) CrossRail 2 Safeguarding Zone London Underground Zone of Interest (Tunnels) Licensing Implications n/a Site Address 158-160 Pentonville Road, London, N1 9JL Proposal Demolition of existing single storey building and erection of part one, part 4 storey plus basement office (Use Class B1(a)) with associated works (Departure from Development Plan)) Case Officer Simon Roberts Applicant Korbe Ltd Agent GML Architects Ltd 1. RECOMMENDATION 1.1. The Committee is asked to resolve to GRANT planning permission: subject to the conditions set out in Appendix 1; and conditional upon the prior completion of a Deed of Planning Obligation made under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing the heads of terms as set out in Appendix 1. 2. SITE LOCATION AND PHOTOS Figure 1: Site Plan (outlined in red) Figure 2: Aerial view from the south Figure 3: Aerial view from the north Figure 4: Photograph of the front elevation of the building from Pentonville Road Figure 5: Photograph showing the access from Cumming Street Figure 6: Photograph of the rear of the site 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Thameslink Rolling Stock Qualitative Research
    Thameslink Rolling Stock Qualitative research Prepared for Passenger Focus in a joint project with the Department for Transport and London TravelWatch August 2008 Introduction This report is about what passengers want from the £5.5 billion Thameslink project. The scheme aims to deliver significant additional capacity on the First Capital Connect Bedford to Brighton route and, ultimately, other routes including some First Capital Connect East Colin Foxall CBE Coast Main Line (Great Northern) services. hese are already well-used parts of the network where passenger demand T is expected to grow strongly. Many stations will have platforms lengthened to accept 12 coach trains and Blackfriars and London Bridge stations will be substantially improved through major rebuilding. As well as planned improvements to the physical infrastructure on which trains run and to the stations passengers use, the Thameslink Programme will bring brand new trains into service on the routes concerned. Passenger Focus as part of its work representing the interests of passengers commissioned research on passengers views about how the new trains should be laid out and the facilities they should provide for their passengers. It is vital that the trains meet passenger needs and expectations and that they also reflect the diverse demands of the different routes they will serve. Two consumer organisations represent the interests of rail passengers on the Thameslink routes: Passenger Focus, the independent national rail consumer watchdog and London TravelWatch, the voice of London’s transport users. The two organisations have worked together with The Department for Transport, which is responsible for the procurement of the new trains, to ensure that passengers’ views are properly at the heart of decisions about the design of the trains – right from the earliest stages of their procurement.
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGNATION 2008 (No. 3) VARIATION ORDER 2019
    THE GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY THE GLA ROADS (No. 3) DESIGNATION 2008 (No. 3) VARIATION ORDER 2019 Made December 2019 Coming into force December 2019 The Mayor of London keeps under review the system of highways and proposed highways in Greater London and the allocation of responsibility for that system between the different local highway authorities, and he considers it expedient that certain roads should become or cease to be GLA Roads. Therefore, the Greater London Authority, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14B of the Highways Act 1980a and of all other enabling powers, and with the consent of the Councils for the London Borough of Islington, hereby makes the following Order: 1. Citation and Commencement This Order may be cited as The GLA Roads (No. 3) Designation 2008 (No. 3) Variation Order 2019 and shall come into force on December 2019. 2. Variation From the date on which this Order comes into force, the Schedule to The GLA Roads (No. 3) Designation 2008, is varied as follows: (1) Under the heading “GLA Roads in London Borough of Islington”: a. Item 2 is substituted as follows: 2 A1 (HOLLOWAY ROAD (HIGHBURY CORNER), ST PAUL’S ROAD, CANONBURY ROAD, UPPER STREET, ISLINGTON HIGH STREET, GOSWELL ROAD), both sides from the south-eastern side of its junction with St John’s Way to the south-east side of its junction with Wakley Street b. Item 2a is added as follows: 2a A1 (UNNAMED SERVICE ROAD FRONTING NOS. 257 TO 259 UPPER STREET), both sides for its entire length Dated this day of December 2019 Tim Steer, Assistant Director of Transport, Infrastructure and Connectivity DMR0--- 1 THE GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY THE GLA SIDE ROADS (LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON) DESIGNATION ORDER 2008 (No.
    [Show full text]
  • N205 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    N205 bus time schedule & line map N205 Leyton, Downsell Road - Paddington View In Website Mode The N205 bus line (Leyton, Downsell Road - Paddington) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Leyton, Downsell Road: 12:45 AM - 5:15 AM (2) Paddington: 12:30 AM - 4:30 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest N205 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next N205 bus arriving. Direction: Leyton, Downsell Road N205 bus Time Schedule 52 stops Leyton, Downsell Road Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:40 AM - 5:15 AM Monday 12:45 AM - 5:15 AM Cleveland Terrace (L) Eastbourne Mews, London Tuesday 12:45 AM - 5:15 AM Paddington Station (H) Wednesday 12:45 AM - 5:15 AM 127 Praed Street, London Thursday 12:45 AM - 5:15 AM St Mary's Hospital (P) Friday 12:45 AM - 5:15 AM 93 Praed Street, London Saturday 12:40 AM - 5:15 AM Edgware Road Station (ET) Chapel Street, London Marylebone Station (N) Marylebone Road, London N205 bus Info Direction: Leyton, Downsell Road Old Marylebone Town Hall (W) Stops: 52 3 Glentworth Street, London Trip Duration: 65 min Line Summary: Cleveland Terrace (L), Paddington Baker Street Station (D) Station (H), St Mary's Hospital (P), Edgware Road Allsop Place, London Station (ET), Marylebone Station (N), Old Marylebone Town Hall (W), Baker Street Station (D), Harley Street Harley Street (M) (M), Regent's Park Station (A), Great Portland St Stn 20 Devonshire Place, London / Euston Rd (H), Warren Street Station (KA), Euston Square Station (Q), Euston Station (D), British Regent's Park Station
    [Show full text]
  • THEMED Priority Questions to Bob Kiley – Transport Commissioner
    Subject: THEMED Priority Questions to Bob Kiley – Transport Commissioner, TfL Report number: 6 (b) Report to: London Assembly Date: 6 April 2005 Report of: Director Of Secretariat Part A – Themed Priority Questions 1. TfL’s Corporate Governance Bob Kiley - Transport Commissioner Appointment of TfL Directors Question No: 137 / 2005 Andrew Pelling What role do you play in the appointment of Directors to the Board of TfL? Copyright of Congestion Charge Scheme Sally Hamwee Who owns the congestion charge scheme copyright (idea/design)? What is it worth and which cities are interested in buying it? How much income has Capita and/or TfL received to date from advising on or selling the copyright/design of the congestion charge scheme to other cities? Living Wage John Biggs What has TfL done to ensure its staff, and its contractors staff, are paid a living wage, consistent with the Mayor’s proposals? What obstacles exist to the universal roll-out of this policy and what would overcome these obstacles? TfL Employees Murad Qureshi What are you doing to ensure that TfL employees are all treated with respect by the organisation? 1 2. Transport Infrastructure in London Bob Kiley - Transport Commissioner Mobile Phones on the Underground Question No: 117 / 2005 Bob Neill 1) How much will it cost to implement your planned mobile phone use on a. Tube stations b. Tube trains? 2) Do you expect this scheme to be a cost burden on London Underground or a revenue raiser? How much do you expect it will cost - or will raise in revenue? 3) Do you propose charging mobile phone companies for access to mobile phone reception on the Tube or are you proposing another form of market mechanism or another form of mechanism altogether? If so, could you explain what it is.
    [Show full text]
  • An Outstanding Office Investment Opportunity
    AN OUTSTANDING OFFICE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY THE GRIMALDI BUILDING 154a PenTONVILLE ROAD KING’S CROSS, LONDON N1 15,636 sq ft (1,452.6 sq m) 13 onsite pARKING SPACES INVESTMENT SUMMARY: • S ituated on the north side of Pentonville Road, • A new head lease for a term of 150 years from equidistant between Angel and King’s Cross/ 6th March 2013. The current head rent payable St Pancras underground and mainline stations. is £32,000 per annum rising from the 2nd January 2014 to £60,000 per annum, being • A highly prominent and characterful self- 12.50% of either rents received or open market contained office building constructed from rental value, and will be reviewable upwards new in 1991 and comprehensively refurbished only on a 5 yearly basis in line with RPI. in 2012 to an excellent standard. • Current net passing rent of £448,000 pax. • T he property extends to a net internal area of 15,636 sq ft and has the benefit of 13 onsite car • We have been instructed to seek offers in excess parking spaces. of £6,500,000 subject to contract and exclusive of VAT for the benefit of our clients long leasehold • S ingle let to Eviivo Limited on an FR&I lease interest. A purchase at this level would reflect a for a term of 10 years from 30th March 2012, capital value of £416 psf and the following yield subject to an upwards only rent review and profile after the deduction of the ground rent and a tenants option to break at the 5th year.
    [Show full text]
  • AOC AOC Architecture the Crafts Council, 44A Pentonville Road
    The Crafts Council, 44A Pentonville Road, London, N1 9BY DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT including a Heritage Status Assessment August 2017 AOC AOC Architecture DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Contents Introduction Site Claremont Hall 1.0 HERITAGE STATUS ASSESSMENT Address 44a Pentonville Road Islington 1.1 Introduction London, N1 9BY 1.2 Historic significance of Claremont Hall in the immediate locality 1.3 Architectural and townscape description Client Crafts Council 1.4 Current proposals Address 44a Pentonville road 1.5 Conclusions Islington London, N1 9BY 2.0 DESIGN PROCESS Contact Andy McGlynn, Development Director Tel. 0207 806 2520 2.1 Original Brief Email [email protected] 2.2 Assessment .1 Physical context Agent AOC Architecture Ltd .2 Historical context Address 24-28 Pritchards Road .3 Planning and policy context London, E2 9AP 2.3 Involvement: a shared conversation Contact Martha Rawlinson, Architectural Assistant 2.4 Evaluation Tel. 02077399950 Email [email protected] 3.0 DESIGN PROPOSAL 3.1 Use 3.2 Amount 3.3 Layout 3.4 Scale 3.5 Appearance (incl. hard landscape) 3.6 Site boundaries 3.7 Accessibility 3.8 Sustainability 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1 Structural Engineers Drawing AOC Architecture Ltd. The Crafts Counci 24-28 Pritchards Road, London, E2 9AP Design & Access Statement tel. 0207 739 9950 2 www.theaoc.co.uk [email protected] DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Introduction This is a Design and Access Statement in support of a formal planning application for consent to make external and internal modifications to Claremont Hall, a Grade 2 listed building, including: 1. Removal of modern non-compliant access ramps, steps and balustrading in forecourt and construction of new pre-cast concrete sloping and stepped access.
    [Show full text]
  • London Buses - Route Description
    Printed On: 26 June 2019 11:28:02 LONDON BUSES - ROUTE DESCRIPTION ROUTE 205: Paddington Station - Bow Church Date of Structural Change: 27 July 2019. Date of Service Change: 27 July 2019. Reason for Issue: Introduction of a new schedule with connection to Old Street Gyratory. STREETS TRAVERSED Towards Bow Church: Cleveland Terrace, Westbourne Terrace, Bishop's Bridge Road, Eastbourne Terrace, Praed Street, Chapel Street, Old Marylebone Road, Marylebone Road, Euston Road, Euston Bus Station, Grafton Place, Churchway, Euston Road, Pentonville Road, City Road, Old Street Roundabout, Old Street, Great Eastern Street, Holywell Lane, Shoreditch High Street, Norton Folgate, Bishopsgate, Camomile Street, Outwich Street, Houndsditch, St Botolph Street, Middlesex Street, Whitechapel High Street, Whitechapel Road, Mile End Road, Bow Road. Towards Paddington Station: Bow Road, Mile End Road, Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel High Street, St Botolph Street, Duke's Place, Bevis Marks, Camomile Street, Bishopsgate, Norton Folgate, Shoreditch High Street, Great Eastern Street, Old Street, Old Street Roundabout, City Road, City Road Bus Lane Slip Road, City Road, Pentonville Road, King's Cross Bridge, Gray's Inn Road, Euston Road, Marylebone Road, Balcombe Street, Melcombe Place, Harewood Avenue, Marylebone Road, Old Marylebone Road, Sussex Gardens, Norfolk Place, Praed Street, Eastbourne Terrace, Cleveland Terrace. AUTHORISED STANDS, CURTAILMENT POINTS, & BLIND DESCRIPTIONS Please note that only stands, curtailment points, & blind descriptions as detailed in this contractual document may be used. PADDINGTON, CLEVELAND TERRACE Public stand for two buses on south-east side of Cleveland Terrace commencing at junction with Eastbourne Mews and extending 30 metres north-east. Buses proceed from Cleveland Terrace direct to stand, departing to Cleveland Terrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Streets Apart
    Streets Apart: Outdoor Prostitution in London Julie Bindel and Helen Atkins The POPPY Project Eaves Housing for Women Second Floor Lincoln House London SW9 6DE Telephone 020 7735 2062 www.eaves4women.co.uk Charity Number 275048 Acknowledgements Thank you to those organisations which facilitated outreach for the researchers – Estelle Young, Healthy Options (Newham), Pam Mazava, Streetlink (Streatham). Sarah Stephen-Smith for the initial planning and research, and Louise Hinchliffe for her design and publishing of this document. Ken Shuttlewood from the Police Performance Information Bureau provided useful crime and arrest figures, as did Hanna Gregory from the Prostitution Strategy Team, Home Office. Thanks you also to Sue Jago, Home Office, and Chris Pellett, analyst with CO14 (Metropolitan Police Clubs and Vice Unit). 2 Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................5 2. Aims and Methods .....................................................................................9 3. Police Responses ....................................................................................11 3.1 Anti Social Behaviour Orders ........................................................................................ 12 3.2 All Cautions for Prostitution by Borough ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Hackney ........................................................................................................................ 14 3.4 Haringey.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kingscrosstoislington Maximus .Pdf
    Kings Cross to Islington Maximus Maximise Behind the scenes IMPACTS 1.46 million per 14 days Maximus are proud to present a new and exciting Mega Banner where King’s Cross is currently undergoing the largest and most exciting Kings Cross meets Islington. redevelopment in London. The area has a rich history and a unique setting. What was an underused industrial wasteland has been SIZE 9m wide x 12m high Pentonville Road is famous as one of London’s key roads as a continuation of transformed into a new and integral London hub with homes, shops, London’s main artery from East to West (A501), measuring just 0.7 miles and oces, galleries, bars, restaurants, schools, a University and of course specifically linking Kings Cross to Angel, Islington. The Pentonville Road was its famous transport interchanges. Thanks to its new reputation as a MAXIMUS FACTOR 12 originally built to connect the City of London to the Western Suburbs. Today business and creative hub, Google, The Guardian, Luis Vuitton and it is a key arterial road, busy with both trac and pedestrians alike. media giant Havas having recently moved in, with Universal Music soon to join them. VISIBILITY 50 meters The road set up means cars can only travel east-bound towards Islington ensuring that all vehicular impacts on this busy stretch of road are directly Islington is often referred to as the ‘original London Gentrification’. Now head-on. in its second ascension Islington has consistently been one of London’s TARGET GROUPS trend setters, city workers, most desirable areas over the last 25 years.
    [Show full text]