DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress Assessment of the CRRF Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progress Assessment of the CRRF Approach CENTRALIZED ES/2018/07 Two Year Progress Assessment of the CRRF Approach September 2016 - September 2018 EVALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 2018 Conducted by: EVALUATION SERVICE UNHCR Evaluation Service UNHCR’s Evaluation Policy confirms UNHCR’s commitment to support accountability, learning and continual improvement through the systematic examination and analysis of organisational strategies, policies, and programmes. Evaluations are guided by the principles of independence, impartiality, credibility and utility, and are undertaken to enhance the organization’s performance in addressing the protection, assistance and solution needs of refugees, stateless people and other persons of concern. Evaluation Service United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Case Postale 2500 1211 Genève 2 Switzerland www.unhcr.org Published by UNHCR Evaluation Service Copyright © 2018 UNHCR This document is issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for general distribution. All rights are reserved. Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided UNHCR is acknowledged. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this Evaluation Report are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names and related data shown on maps and included in lists, tables, and documents in this Evaluation Report are not warranted to be error free, nor do they necessarily imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNHCR or the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the Evaluation Service under the guidance of Ritu Shroff in consultation with the Division of Resilience and Solutions. We are grateful for the time and effort colleagues from UNHCR and affiliated partners have exerted to support the production of this report. We would like to thank the following colleagues from UNHCR for their input and support (in alphabetical order): Tarek Abou-Chabake, Mamadou Balde, Giovanni Bassu, William Chemaly, Renee Cuijpers, Daniel Endres, Betsy Greve, Karen Gulick, Ellen Hanson, Caroline Lensing-Hebben, Ewen Macleod, Miriam Malmqvist, Pedro Mendes, Marta Moroni, Jose Samaniego, Tammi Sharpe, Vicky Tennant, and Leslie Velez. We are also thankful to the government counterparts in CRRF countries for their time and valuable contributions as well numerous other colleagues. Information at a glance Title of the Report: Two Year Progress Assessment of the CRRF Approach Timeframe covered: September 2016 – September 2018 Type of Report: Assessment of global policy and strategy Countries covered: Global Report initiated and funded Evaluation Service by: Contacts in UNHCR: Joel Kinahan and Nabila Hameed (ES) [email protected], [email protected] 2 Contents Two Year Progress Assessment of the CRRF Approach: Synthesis ..................................................................................... 1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Reflections on the practical application of the CRRF ....................................................................................................... 4 Progress towards Objective One: Ease pressures on the host countries involved .......................................................... 5 Progress towards Objective Two: Enhance refugee self-reliance .................................................................................... 7 Progress towards Objective Three: Expand access to third-country solutions ................................................................ 8 Progress towards Objective Four: Support conditions in countries of origin for return in safety and dignity .............. 10 Key conclusions from practical application of the CRRF ................................................................................................ 12 Two Year Progress Assessment of the CRRF Approach: Full Report………………………………………………………………………..….. 14 List of abbreviations............................................................................................................................................................ 15 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 17 2. Purpose of the report ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 3. Methodology and limitations.......................................................................................................................................... 20 4. Progress Towards Objective 1: Ease Pressures on the Host Countries Involved ............................................................ 21 4.1. Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 21 4.2. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.3. Donor support to the application of the CRRF ........................................................................................................ 23 4.4. Shifts in donor grants, contributions and concessional financing in CRRF countries ............................................. 23 4.6. Private sector contributions and pathways .......................................................................................................... 28 5. Progress Towards Objective 2: Enhance Refugee Self-Reliance ..................................................................................... 30 5.1. Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 5.2. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 30 5.3. Emerging regional frameworks ............................................................................................................................... 31 5.4. Emerging national policies ...................................................................................................................................... 33 55. Policies facilitating inclusion and self-reliance ........................................................................................................ 37 5.6. Policies facilitating access to education .................................................................................................................. 40 6. Progress Towards Objective 3: Expand Access to Third-Country Solutions .................................................................... 42 6.1. Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 42 6.2. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 42 6.3. Global policy progress towards enhanced access to resettlement and third-country solutions ............................ 44 6.4. Resettlement trends from countries applying the CRRF ......................................................................................... 45 7. Progress Towards Objective 4: Support Conditions in Countries of Origin for Return in Safety and Dignity ................. 48 7.1. Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 48 7.2. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 48 7.3. Policy developments ............................................................................................................................................... 49 7.4. Returnee trends from countries applying the CRRF ............................................................................................... 51 8. Analysis: Reflections on the Application of the CRRF ..................................................................................................... 54 8.1. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 54 8.2. Emerging lessons ..................................................................................................................................................... 55 3 9. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................................... 60 Annexes .............................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020
    Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020 Fiscal policy amid the crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020 Fiscal policy amid the crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Daniel Titelman Chief, Economic Development Division Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division The Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean is a report prepared each year by the Economic Development Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). The preparation of this year’s report was supervised by Daniel Titelman, Chief of the Division, and Noel Pérez Benítez, Chief of the Division’s Fiscal Affairs Unit. Jean Baptiste Carpentier, María Gil, Michael Hanni, Juan Pablo Jiménez and Noel Pérez Benítez worked on the drafting of the report. Chapter III drew on inputs prepared by Juan Carlos Gómez Sabaini and Dalmiro Morán. Andrea Podestá prepared inputs for chapter IV. Swen Tellier provided research assistance and prepared statistical information. The Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID) assisted with the financing of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • MIRPS: Regional Context and Comprehensive Approach
    Index Part 1 ..................................................... 1 MIRPS: Regional Context and Comprehensive Approach............................................................................. 1.1 National Chapters of MIRPS Countries……………….. 1.2 Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama Part 2 ......... …………………………………….2 Contributions from Cooperation Actors………….…. 2.1 Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Spain, Switzerland, Uruguay, UNHCR Spanish Committee Contributions from Regional and International Organisations and from Regional Networks……………………………………………..……..…..... 2.2 Organization of American States (OAS), Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, General Secretariat of the Central American Integration System (SG SICA), Secretariat of the Central American Social Integration System (SISCA), Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), United Nations Development Group (UNDG Lac), Resident Coordinators of the United Nations System in Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Human Rights Institutions, Latin American and Caribbean Ecclesiastic Network of Migration, Displacement, Asylum and Human Trafficking (CLAMOR), Regional Network of Civil Society Organisations for Migration (RROCM), Risk, Emergency & Disaster Working Group for Latin America and the Caribbean (REDLAC), Specialised Regional Group of Academics who Support the Comprehensive Regional Protection and Solutions Framework (GREAT MIRPS), Integrarse Network. NOTICE / DISCLAIMER:
    [Show full text]
  • Towards the Implementation of the MIRPS in Central America & Mexico
    Concept notes Towards the implementation of the MIRPS in Central America & Mexico Concept notes on selected sectors 2020 Concept notes Context Impacted by increasingly complex forced displacement situations, Central America hosts hundreds of thousands of people who have fled their homes, either within or across their country’s borders, in search of safety. This includes IDPs in El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico; together with refugees and asylum-seekers from the northern Central American countries who have fled chronic gang violence, persecution and insecurity. The vast majority of refugees and asylum-seekers from these countries are hosted in Mexico and the USA, with several thousands more having sought asylum in Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Panama. In addition, tens of thousands of people have fled the social and political crisis in Nicaragua, the vast majority arriving in neighbouring Costa Rica where asylum claims have increased exponentially. In 2019, the Americas was the largest recipient of asylum applications worldwide. An additional several hundred thousand persons are returning to their countries of origin as deportees, including those with protection needs. With an increasing trend of people forcibly displaced in the region exerting pressure on national protection and asylum systems, the MIRPS seeks to expand the operational capacity of States in Central America and Mexico to respond to forced displacement. This includes making the necessary arrangements to ensure safe reception and admission of people forced to flee, facilitating access to safe spaces and shelters, engaging community and municipal leadership, promoting durable solutions and livelihoods, as well as fostering an environment of peaceful coexistence. In 2017, Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Panama adopted the San Pedro Sula Declaration, to address forced displacement by strengthening the protection and assistance to affected persons, as well as promoting durable solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Index 2020 in Sickness and in Health?
    Democracy Index 2020 In sickness and in health? A report by The Economist Intelligence Unit www.eiu.com The world leader in global business intelligence The Economist Intelligence Unit (The EIU) is the research and analysis division of The Economist Group, the sister company to The Economist newspaper. Created in 1946, we have over 70 years’ experience in helping businesses, financial firms and governments to understand how the world is changing and how that creates opportunities to be seized and risks to be managed. Given that many of the issues facing the world have an international (if not global) dimension, The EIU is ideally positioned to be commentator, interpreter and forecaster on the phenomenon of globalisation as it gathers pace and impact. EIU subscription services The world’s leading organisations rely on our subscription services for data, analysis and forecasts to keep them informed about what is happening around the world. We specialise in: • Country Analysis: Access to regular, detailed country-specific economic and political forecasts, as well as assessments of the business and regulatory environments in different markets. • Risk Analysis: Our risk services identify actual and potential threats around the world and help our clients understand the implications for their organisations. • Industry Analysis: Five year forecasts, analysis of key themes and news analysis for six key industries in 60 major economies. These forecasts are based on the latest data and in-depth analysis of industry trends. EIU Consulting EIU Consulting is a bespoke service designed to provide solutions specific to our customers’ needs. We specialise in these key sectors: • Healthcare: Together with our two specialised consultancies, Bazian and Clearstate, The EIU helps healthcare organisations build and maintain successful and sustainable businesses across the healthcare ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Coffee Annual
    Required Report: Required - Public Distribution Date: May 14, 2021 Report Number: GT2021-0013 Report Name: Coffee Annual Country: Guatemala Post: Guatemala City Report Category: Coffee Prepared By: Karla Tay Approved By: Andrew Hochhalter Report Highlights: Guatemala coffee planted area in MY2021/2022 is forecast to remain steady at 305,000 Ha, but harvested area will increase 2 percent as planted trees mature. Production is forecast at 3.47 million 60- Kg bags, a 10 percent increase compared to 3.15 million 60-Kg bags estimated for the MY2020/2021 harvest, hit by hurricanes Eta and Iota at the beginning of the harvest. Between the storms and the COVID pandemic in 2020, the harvest dropped 16 percent. Exports in MY2021/2022 are forecast at 3.2 million 60-Kg bags. Consumption in MY2021/2022 will slightly recover as hotels, restaurants, and coffee shops open, but continue with limitations due to less than 1 percent of the Guatemalans being COVID vaccinated as of May 2021. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Crop Area: At least 93 percent of the coffee in Guatemala continues to be grown under shade, much of it on steep mountain ranges in the primary water sources areas, which creates an agroforestry system (Photo 1) that protects watersheds, reduces soil erosion, and allows for nutrient recycling. Coffee forests represent 7 percent of the national forest cover. Photo 1 Agroforestry coffee system in Guatemala Source: ANACAFE, 2021 Guatemala’s coffee planted area forecast for MY2021/2022 is 305,000 hectares (Ha), just as in the past three years, but harvested area is forecast to increase to 270,000 Ha as bearing trees increase to 1.2 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19, Elites and the Future Political Economy of Inequality Reduction in Latin America
    COVID-19, elites and the future political economy of inequality reduction in Latin America Benedicte Bull and Francisco Robles Rivera Abstract The literature is divided on the impact of pandemics on income inequality. The economic literature points to an increase in inequality as a result of pandemics, whereas historical and political science literature argue that pandemics may create breakdowns of institutions, maintaining inequality due to elite shifts and pressure from below. We review current data on the impact of COVID-19 and find that there is evidence of an upward income transfer as well as some elite shifts in the region. However, elites have controlled the economic measures to alleviate and confront the crisis and there is little evidence of a resultant institutional breakdown. Keywords COVID-19, viruses, epidemics, economic aspects, income distribution, elite, wealth, poverty, economic policy, Latin America JEL classification N46, P16, D36 Authors Benedicte Bull is a professor in the Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM) at the University of Oslo, Norway. Email: [email protected]. Francisco Robles Rivera is a researcher in the Institute of Social Research and Lecturer at the School of Communication at the University of Costa Rica. Email: [email protected]. 78 CEPAL Review N° 132 • December 2020 I. Introduction The debate on the effect of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on inequality has changed dramatically over the last months. While COVID-19 was portrayed as “the great equalizer” in the early stages of the spread of the infection and lockdown measures (Mein, 2020), evidence now abounds that the pandemic will increase poverty and inequality (Busso and Messina, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Concept Notes
    Concept notes Towards the implementation of the MIRPS in Central America & Mexico Concept notes on selected sectors 2020 Concept notes Context Impacted by increasingly complex forced displacement situations, Central America hosts hundreds of thousands of people who have fled their homes, either within or across their country’s borders, in search of safety. This includes IDPs in El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico; together with refugees and asylum-seekers from the northern Central American countries who have fled chronic gang violence, persecution and insecurity. The vast majority of refugees and asylum-seekers from these countries are hosted in Mexico and the USA, with several thousands more having sought asylum in Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Panama. In addition, tens of thousands of people have fled the social and political crisis in Nicaragua, the vast majority arriving in neighbouring Costa Rica where asylum claims have increased exponentially. In 2019, the Americas was the largest recipient of asylum applications worldwide. An additional several hundred thousand persons are returning to their countries of origin as deportees, including those with protection needs. With an increasing trend of people forcibly displaced in the region exerting pressure on national protection and asylum systems, the MIRPS seeks to expand the operational capacity of States in Central America and Mexico to respond to forced displacement. This includes making the necessary arrangements to ensure safe reception and admission of people forced to flee, facilitating access to safe spaces and shelters, engaging community and municipal leadership, promoting durable solutions and livelihoods, as well as fostering an environment of peaceful coexistence. In 2017, Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Panama adopted the San Pedro Sula Declaration, to address forced displacement by strengthening the protection and assistance to affected persons, as well as promoting durable solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Impact of Covid-19 on Port Operations in Central America and Dominican Republic
    CENTRAL AMERICAN COMMISSION FOR MARITIME TRANSPORTATION REPORT IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON PORT OPERATIONS IN CENTRAL AMERICA AND DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Central American Commission for Maritime Transportation Managua, Nicaragua A May, 2020 A 2 Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 I. GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................... 4 II. PERFORMANCE OF PORT OPERATIONS IN THE REGION FACING THE PANDEMIC......................................................................................................................... 5 III. DETECTION OF COVID-19 IN PORTS/TERMINALS ................................................. 8 IV. PREVENTIVE ACTIONS AT PORTS/TERMINALS ................................................... 10 V. LEVEL OF IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON PORT OPERATIONS .................................. 11 VI. IMPACT PROPECTS ON THE SUPPLY CHAIN, IF THE PERIOD OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ISSUED MEASURES BY THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES IS EXTENDED ...................................................................................................................... 14 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS OF PORTS/TERMINALS TO THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS TO GUARANTEE THE SUPPLY CHAIN FLUIDITY ............................ 15 Guatemala ................................................................................................................. 15 El Salvador ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protection Concept Notes
    Concept notes Towards the implementation of the MIRPS in Central America & Mexico Concept notes on selected sectors 2020 Concept notes Context Impacted by increasingly complex forced displacement situations, Central America hosts hundreds of thousands of people who have fled their homes, either within or across their country’s borders, in search of safety. This includes IDPs in El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico; together with refugees and asylum-seekers from the northern Central American countries who have fled chronic gang violence, persecution and insecurity. The vast majority of refugees and asylum-seekers from these countries are hosted in Mexico and the USA, with several thousands more having sought asylum in Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Panama. In addition, tens of thousands of people have fled the social and political crisis in Nicaragua, the vast majority arriving in neighbouring Costa Rica where asylum claims have increased exponentially. In 2019, the Americas was the largest recipient of asylum applications worldwide. An additional several hundred thousand persons are returning to their countries of origin as deportees, including those with protection needs. With an increasing trend of people forcibly displaced in the region exerting pressure on national protection and asylum systems, the MIRPS seeks to expand the operational capacity of States in Central America and Mexico to respond to forced displacement. This includes making the necessary arrangements to ensure safe reception and admission of people forced to flee, facilitating access to safe spaces and shelters, engaging community and municipal leadership, promoting durable solutions and livelihoods, as well as fostering an environment of peaceful coexistence. In 2017, Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Panama adopted the San Pedro Sula Declaration, to address forced displacement by strengthening the protection and assistance to affected persons, as well as promoting durable solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean
    Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020 Fiscal policy amid the crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020 Fiscal policy amid the crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Daniel Titelman Chief, Economic Development Division Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division The Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean is a report prepared each year by the Economic Development Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). The preparation of this year’s report was supervised by Daniel Titelman, Chief of the Division, and Noel Pérez Benítez, Chief of the Division’s Fiscal Affairs Unit. Jean Baptiste Carpentier, María Gil, Michael Hanni, Juan Pablo Jiménez and Noel Pérez Benítez worked on the drafting of the report. Chapter III drew on inputs prepared by Juan Carlos Gómez Sabaini and Dalmiro Morán. Andrea Podestá prepared inputs for chapter IV. Swen Tellier provided research assistance and prepared statistical information. The Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID) assisted with the financing of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Emigrant Widows of Tajikistan and Guatemala: Where Structural Poverty and Structural Repression of Women Intersect
    Emigrant Widows of Tajikistan and Guatemala: Where Structural Poverty and Structural Repression of Women Intersect Judy Elizabeth Lane Boyer HMN 679HB Honors Humanities Program The University of Texas at Austin May 2021 Thomas Jesus Garza Department of Slavic and Eurasian Studies Supervising Professor Bella B. Jordan Department of Slavic and Eurasian Studies Second Reader Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 5 Research Design .................................................................................................................. 6 Argument ............................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................................... 8 Research Design Evolution ................................................................................................. 8 Initial Design ................................................................................................................... 8 Tajikistan ......................................................................................................................... 9 Guatemala .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Impact of COVID-19 on Refugees and Migrants in Guatemala and Mexico
    MMC Latin America and the Caribbean - 4Mi Snapshot – February 2021 Trends in the impact of COVID-19 on refugees and migrants in Guatemala and Mexico This snapshot offers an analysis on how the impact of the COVID-19 crisis among Profiles refugees and migrants in Guatemala and Mexico has changed between July and November of 2020. It is based on 4Mi interviews with refugees and migrants and a few This analysis is based on 644 surveys implemented between July 13th and November key informant interviews in Guatemala City and Tapachula. It aims to contribute towards 29th, 2020, in Guatemala and Mexico, partially by face-to-face interviews and partially a solid evidence base to inform targeted responses on the ground, as well as advocacy remotely, by phone. efforts related to the situation of refugees and migrants during the coronavirus pandemic. 62% of respondents were interviewed in Mexico and 38% in Guatemala. 87% of those Results presented in this snapshot are indicative: sample composition varied somewhat surveyed in Mexico were in Tapachula City and the remaining 13% were distributed in for each month and has not been weighted, and may therefore account for some of the other cities such as Ciudad Hidalgo, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Monterrey, Alvaro Obregon, Coahuila, differences in findings. In particular, there are slight differences by month for age and sex, Escuintla, Huixtla and Mazatan, among others. 93% of those surveyed in Guatemala were and larger differences for survey location. in the country’s capital, Guatemala City, and the remaining 7% were distributed in other cities such as San Juan Sacatepéquez, Chimaltenango and Escuintla, among others.
    [Show full text]