Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes Version 2.1 Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program Version 2.1 December 06 Disclaimer The views, statements, and conclusions expressed in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as conclusions or opinions of the ABMP. Development of the ABMP has continued since this report was produced. Thus, the report may not accurately reflect current ideas. 0 Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes Version 2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 2 Vertebrate Species .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Amphibians......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Birds.................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Fish.................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Mammals........................................................................................................................................................... 12 Reptiles ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Invertebrate Species.............................................................................................................................................. 14 Collembola (Springtails)................................................................................................................................... 14 Oribatida (Mites)............................................................................................................................................... 29 Vertebrate Species: Alphabetically by ABMP Code............................................................................................ 31 Invertebrate Species (Collembola and Oribatid Mites): Alphabetically by ABMP Code.................................... 42 References............................................................................................................................................................. 59 1 Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes Version 2.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To maintain an efficient and consistent method of data collection and management, all vertebrate and invertebrate species detected and documented during field surveys for the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program (ABMP) are entered onto datasheets, and subsequently a central database, using a unique species code. All vertebrate species codes are 4-letters and typically consist of the first few letters from a species “Common” name; some variations apply. Bird species codes follow those utilized by the American Ornithologists’ Union and Bird Studies Canada (Lepage 2005). All other vertebrate codes are similar to those used by Alberta Environment’s Biodiversity Species Observation Database. Red Squirrel (RESQ) appears in both the mammal and bird list because it is a species commonly documented during breeding bird surveys. All invertebrate species codes were developed by the author based on the format currently used for vascular and nonvascular plants. Invertebrate codes are 7-letters and consist of the first 4-letters of the Genus, and first 3- letters of the species Latin name; some variations apply. Variations typically occur when species have similar spellings for their species’ names and when subspecies occur. Generally, the next letter of a species name will be used in cases for similar spellings (eg., Anurida maritima = ANURMAR and Anurida martynovae = ANURMAT) and in the case of a subspecies, letters from both species and subspecies names may be used (eg., Trhypochthoniellus setosus canadensis = TRHYSEC). The list of mite (orbatida) species was originally gathered from Behan-Pelletier and Eamer (2004) and the springtail (collembola) list was originally compiled from a North American species list (Nearctica.com). Variations in codes are highlighted in blue so field staff can distinguish differences between species and ensure the proper code is utilized. Codes that are highlighted in blue, and in bold print, indicate similar conflicts but with a different taxon (i.e., moss or lichen species). All vertebrate and invertebrate species codes are listed alphabetically by ABMP code for ease of reference. Along with the ABMP species code, this document includes the internationally recognized “Nature Serve” codes given to all biodiversity, scientific names, and common names (when they exist). All vertebrate species found in this document are ranked according to the 2005 General Status of Alberta Wild Species (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development 2006). Each ranking is conveniently colour-coded for ease of viewing. At Risk Any species known to be “At Risk” after formal detailed status assessment and designation as “Endangered” or “Threatened” in Alberta. May Be At Risk Any species the “May Be At Risk” of extinction or extirpation, and is therefore a candidate for detailed status assessment. Sensitive Any species that is not at risk of extinction or extirpation but may require special attention or protection to prevent it from becoming at risk. Secure A species that is not “At Risk”, “May Be At Risk”, or “Sensitive”. Undetermined Any species for which insufficient information, knowledge or data is available to reliably evaluate its general status. Not Assessed Any species that has not been examined. Exotic/Alien Any species that has been introduced as a result of human activities. Extirpated/Extinct Any species no longer thought to be present in Alberta (extirpated) or no longer believed to be present anywhere in the world (extinct). Accidental/Vagrant Any species occurring infrequently and unpredictably in Alberta (i.e., outside its usual range). 2 Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes Version 2.1 Vertebrate Species Amphibians ABMP Nature Serve Provincial Ranking Common Name Scientific Name Code AAABC05070 BCFR Secure Boreal Chorus Frog Pseudacris triseriata AAABB01080 CATO May Be At Risk Canadian Toad Bufo hemiophrys AAABH01290 SPFR Sensitive Columbia Spotted Frog Rana luteiventris AAABB01050 GPTO May Be At Risk Great Plains Toad Bufo cognatus AAAAA01080 LTSA Sensitive Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum AAABH01170 NLFR At Risk Northern Leopard Frog Rana pipiens AAABF02010 PLSP May Be At Risk Plains Spadefoot Toad Spea bombifrons AAAAA01140 TISA Secure Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum N/A UNTA N/A Unidentified Tadpole Rana, Bufo, Pseudacrisand Spea AAABB01030 WETO Sensitive Western Toad Bufo boreas AAABH01200 WOFR Secure Wood Frog Rana sylvatica Birds ABMP Provincial Nature Serve Common Name Scientific Name Code Ranking ABPAE33030 ALFL Secure Alder Flycatcher Empidonax alnorum ABNND02010 AMAV Secure American Avocet Recurvirostra americana ABNGA01020 AMBI Sensitive American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus ABNJB10040 ABDU Secure American Black Duck Anas rubripes ABNME14020 AMCO Secure American Coot Fulica americana ABPAV10010 AMCR Secure American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos ABPBH01010 AMDI Secure American Dipper Cinclus mexicanus ABNNB02030 AMGP Secure American Golden-Plover Pluvialis dominica ABPBY06110 AMGO Secure American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis ABNKD06020 AMKE Secure American Kestrel Falco sparverius ABPBM02050 AMPI Secure American Pipit Anthus rubescens ABPBX06010 AMRE Secure American Redstart Setophaga ruticilla ABPBJ20170 AMRO Secure American Robin Turdus migratorius ABPBX94010 ATSP Secure American Tree Sparrow Spizella arborea ABNFC01010 AWPE Sensitive American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos ABNJB10180 AMWI Secure American Wigeon Anas americana ABNNN07030 ANMU Accidental/Vagrant Ancient Murrelet Synthliboramphus antiquus ABNUC47010 ANHU Accidental/Vagrant Anna's Hummingbird Calypte anna ABNBA01020 ARLO Secure Arctic Loon Gavia arctica ABNNM08080 ARTE Secure Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea ABNNF11120 BASA Secure Baird's Sandpiper Calidris bairdii ABPBXA0010 BAIS May Be At Risk Baird's Sparrow Ammodramus bairdii ABNKC10010 BAEA Sensitive Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus ABPBXB9190 BAOR Sensitive Baltimore (Northern) Oriole Icterus galbula ABNPB01080 BTPI Accidental/Vagrant Band-tailed Pigeon Columba fasciata ABPAU08010 BANS Sensitive Bank Swallow Riparia riparia ABNSA01010 BNOW Accidental/Vagrant Barn Owl Tyto alba ABPAU09030 BARS Secure Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica ABNSB12020 BDOW Sensitive Barred Owl Strix varia ABNJB18020 BAGO Secure Barrow's Goldeneye Bucephala islandica ABPBX03220 BBWA Sensitive Bay-breasted Warbler Dendroica castanea ABNXD01020 BEKI Secure Belted Kingfisher Ceryle alcyon ABPBK06050 BETH Accidental/Vagrant Bendire's Thrasher Toxostoma bendirei ABPBX05010 BAWW Secure Black and White Warbler Mniotilta varia ABNNN05010 BLGU Accidental/Vagrant Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle ABNJB17010 BLSC Accidental/Vagrant Black Scoter Melanitta nigra 3 Vertebrate and Invertebrate Species Codes Version 2.1 ABNUA01010 BLSW Undetermined Black Swift Cypseloides niger ABNNM10020 BLTE Sensitive Black Tern Chlidonias niger ABNNF09020 BLTU Accidental/Vagrant
Recommended publications
  • Unexpected Diversity in Neelipleona Revealed by Molecular Phylogeny Approach (Hexapoda, Collembola)
    S O I L O R G A N I S M S Volume 83 (3) 2011 pp. 383–398 ISSN: 1864-6417 Unexpected diversity in Neelipleona revealed by molecular phylogeny approach (Hexapoda, Collembola) Clément Schneider1, 3, Corinne Cruaud2 and Cyrille A. D’Haese1 1 UMR7205 CNRS, Département Systématique et Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP50 Entomology, 45 rue Buffon, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France 2 Genoscope, Centre National de Sequençage, 2 rue G. Crémieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry cedex, France 3 Corresponding author: Clément Schneider (email: [email protected]) Abstract Neelipleona are the smallest of the four Collembola orders in term of species number with 35 species described worldwide (out of around 8000 known Collembola). Despite this apparent poor diversity, Neelipleona have a worldwide repartition. The fact that the most commonly observed species, Neelus murinus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax minimus Willem, 1900, display cosmopolitan repartition is striking. A cladistic analysis based on 16S rDNA, COX1 and 28S rDNA D1 and D2 regions, for a broad collembolan sampling was performed. This analysis included 24 representatives of the Neelipleona genera Neelus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax Willem, 1900 from various regions. The interpretation of the phylogenetic pattern and number of transformations (branch length) indicates that Neelipleona are more diverse than previously thought, with probably many species yet to be discovered. These results buttress the rank of Neelipleona as a whole order instead of a Symphypleona family. Keywords: Collembola, Neelidae, Megalothorax, Neelus, COX1, 16S, 28S 1. Introduction 1.1. Brief history of Neelipleona classification The Neelidae family was established by Folsom (1896), who described Neelus murinus from Cambridge (USA).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Springtails (Collembola) from the Republic of Moldova
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 149–160 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0011-x CHECKLIST OF SPRINGTAILS (COLLEMBOLA) FROM THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA GALINA BUªMACHIU Abstract. The checklist of Collembola from the Republic of Moldova including 223 species is presented. The list is based on literature sources and personal collecting. Résumé. Ce travail présente la liste des 223 espèces de collemboles de la République de Moldova. Cette liste fut réalisée en utilisant des références littéraires et des collections personnelles. Key words: Collembola, checklist, Republic of Moldova. INTRODUCTION The records on Collembola from the Republic of Moldova started about 50 years ago with the first two species included by Martynova in “The key to insects of the European part of the USSR. Collembola” (1964). Some more information on species diversity of Collembola from the soil of Moldavian vineyards was included in Stegãrescu’s work (1967). During the last twenty years, this group has been studied more systematically, with more than 200 species recorded (Buºmachiu 2001, 2004, 2006 a, b, 2008). Since 2002, eleven species new to science were described from the Republic of Moldova by da Gama & Buºmachiu (2002, 2004); Buºmachiu & Deharveng (2008) and Buºmachiu & Weiner (2008). Until now, the faunistic data on Collembola from the Republic of Moldova have not been summarised in the form of a checklist. The present paper includes the complete list of Collembola from the Republic of Moldova using the modern nomenclature. Totally, 223 species are listed. Some problematic and dubious species, such as Pseudanurida clysmae Jackson, 1927, Onychiurus fimetarius (Linnaeus, 1758) and Orchesella divergens Handschin, 1929 recorded by Stegãrescu (1967) and Pseudosinella wahlgrei Börner, 1907, are not included in the list.
    [Show full text]
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Ology Vol 58, No. 1
    FDACS-P-00124 April - June 2020 Volume 59, Number 2 TRI- OLOGY A PUBLICATION FROM THE DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY, BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY, NEMATOLOGY, AND PLANT PATHOLOGY Division Director, Trevor R. Smith, Ph.D. BOTANY ENTOMOLOGY NEMATOLOGY PLANT PATHOLOGY Providing information about plants: Identifying arthropods, taxonomic Providing certification programs and Offering plant disease diagnoses native, exotic, protected and weedy research and curating collections diagnoses of plant problems and information Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services • Division of Plant Industry 1 Phaenomerus foveipennis (Morimoto), a conoderine weevil. Photo by Kyle E. Schnepp, DPI ABOUT TRI-OLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services- Division of Plant Industry’s (FDACS-DPI) Bureau of Entomology, HIGHLIGHTS 03 Nematology, and Plant Pathology (ENPP), including the Botany Noteworthy examples from the diagnostic groups Section, produces TRI-OLOGY four times a year, covering three throughout the ENPP Bureau. months of activity in each issue. The report includes detection activities from nursery plant inspections, routine and emergency program surveys, and BOTANY 04 requests for identification of plants and pests from the public. Samples are also occasionally sent from other states or countries Quarterly activity reports from Botany and selected plant identification samples. for identification or diagnosis. HOW TO CITE TRI-OLOGY Section Editor. Year. Section Name. P.J. Anderson and G.S. Hodges ENTOMOLOGY 07 (Editors). TRI-OLOGY Volume (number): page. [Date you accessed site.] Quarterly activity reports from Entomology and samples reported as new introductions or interceptions. For example: S.E. Halbert. 2015. Entomology Section. P.J. Anderson and G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio. Palabras clave: Collembola, biodiversidad, distribución, ecología, acumulación de especies. Abstract. A brief assessment of the importance of the group in different ecosystems is done. A description of the most distinctive morphological characters, as well as biotopes where they live is included. An evaluation of their biodiversity is presented; finding that more than 700 taxa have been cited, many of them at the generic level, in 24 families. Their geographical distribution is discussed and the state richness is pointed out. Tables of ecological classification applied to Mexican species are given.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Palacios-Vargas, José G. Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 220-231 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42529679040 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene-Rich X Chromosomes Implicate Intragenomic Conflict in the Evolution of Bizarre Genetic Systems
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.04.325340; this version posted October 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Gene-rich X chromosomes implicate intragenomic conflict in the evolution of bizarre genetic systems Noelle Anderson1, Kamil S. Jaron2, Christina N. Hodson2, Matthew B. Couger3, Jan Ševčík4, Stacy Pirro5, Laura Ross2 and Scott William Roy1,6 1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA 95343 2Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Boston MA 02115 4Faculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 5Iridian Genomes, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA 6Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94117 Abstract Haplodiploidy and paternal genome elimination (HD/PGE) are common in animals, having evolved at least two dozen times. HD/PGE typically evolves from male heterogamety (i.e., systems with X chromosomes), however why X chromosomes are important for the evolution of HD/PGE remains debated. The Haploid Viability Hypothesis argues that X chromosomes promote the evolution of male haploidy by facilitating purging recessive deleterious mutations. The Intragenomic Conflict Hypothesis instead argues that X chromosomes promote the evolution of male haploidy due to conflicts with autosomes over sex ratios and transmission. To test these hypotheses, we studied lineages that combine germline PGE with XX/X0 sex determination (gPGE+X systems).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 07:28:06AM Via Free Access - 152 P
    Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 64 (3) 151-162 (1994) SPB Academie Publishing bv, The Hague A standardized description of European Sminthuridae (Collembola, Symphypleona), 2: review of four species of the genera Allacma and Spatulosminthurus Pierre Nayrolles Laboratoire de Zoologie, Ecobiologie des Arthropodes édaphiques, UPR CNRS 90 14, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cédex, France Keywords: Collembola, Symphypleona, Allacma, Spatulosminthurus, taxonomy, chaetotaxy, Europe Abstract et al., 1970), thick cuticle with a particular archi- tecture, and well-developed tracheal system with According to our standard of the appendicular chaetotaxy, the chiasmata at the forelegs. Moreover, Betsch & following species are redescribed: Allacma fusca (Linné, 1758), Waller (in press) point out the presence of a secon- Allacma gallica (Carl, 1899), Spatulosminthurus lesnei (Carl, dary (ontogenetic) neochaetosis on the great abdo- 1899), and Spatulosminthurus betschi Nayrolles, 1990. men as a synapomorphy of these three genera (like- ly the consequence of an ontogenetic delay in- The Résumé volving originally primary setae). following putative evolved characters can be added: setae (AD)iO, (AD)i+ 1, and (AD)i + 2 small and slender Nous redécrivons, d’après la standardisation donnée pour la chétotaxie appendiculaire, les espèces suivantes: Allacma fusca on a large base, and mucronal anterior lamella (Linné, 1758), Allacma gallica (Cari, 1899), Spatulosminthurus double. lesnei (Cari, 1899) et Spatulosminthurus betschi Nayrolles, I recall the abbreviations which correspond 1990. neither to setal symbols nor to the legend of the chaetotaxic tables; these were accurately explained in my first Introduction paper. abd. = abdomen This is the second part of a series dealing with the ad.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ I MUNIS ENTOMOLOGY & ZOOLOGY Ankara / Turkey II _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology publishes a wide variety of papers on all aspects of Entomology and Zoology from all of the world, including mainly studies on systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, fauna, biogeography, biodiversity, ecology, morphology, behavior, conservation, paleobiology and other aspects are appropriate topics for papers submitted to Munis Entomology & Zoology. Submission of Manuscripts: Works published or under consideration elsewhere (including on the internet) will not be accepted. At first submission, one double spaced hard copy (text and tables) with figures (may not be original) must be sent to the Editors, Dr. Hüseyin Özdikmen for publication in MEZ. All manuscripts should be submitted as Word file or PDF file in an e-mail attachment. If electronic submission is not possible due to limitations of electronic space at the sending or receiving ends, unavailability of e-mail, etc., we will accept “hard” versions, in triplicate, accompanied by an electronic version stored in a floppy disk, a CD-ROM. Review Process: When submitting manuscripts, all authors provides the name, of at least three qualified experts (they also provide their address, subject fields and e-mails). Then, the editors send to experts to review the papers. The review process should normally be completed within 45-60 days. After reviewing papers by reviwers: Rejected papers are discarded. For accepted papers, authors are asked to modify their papers according to suggestions of the reviewers and editors. Final versions of manuscripts and figures are needed in a digital format.
    [Show full text]
  • Collembola, Symphypleona, Sminthurus, Chaetotaxy, New Species, Taxonomy, Ontogeny
    tot de Dierkunde 64 215-237 Bijdragen , (4) (1995) SPB Academie Publishing b\, The Hague A standardized description of European Sminthuridae (Collembola, 3: of seven of Sminthurus Symphypleona), description species , including four new to science Pierre Nayrolles Laboratoire de Zoologie, Ecobiologie des Arthropodes édaphiques, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France Keywords: Collembola, Symphypleona, Sminthurus, chaetotaxy, new species, taxonomy, ontogeny, France, Spain Abstract tion proposed in the first paper (Nayrolles, 1993a) will be used here again. The following three species are redescribed: Sminthurus viridis Sminthurus Latreille, 1804 is the most ancient (Linnaeus, 1758), Sminthurus nigromaculatus Tullberg, 1871, genus of Symphypleona. The genus was hetero- and Sminthurus multipunctatus Schäffer, 1896. Four new spe- geneous, and progressively species were transferred cies are described from France and Spain: Sminthurus bour- to different review of genera. The last the genuswas geoisin. sp., Sminthurus bozoulensis n. sp., Sminthurus leuco- by Betsch & Betsch-Pinot in 1984. Within the sub- melanus n.sp.,and Sminthurus hispanicus n. sp. The importance of the ontogeny of chaetotaxyis stressed. Indeed, not all species family Sminthurinae, these authors distinguished acquire the secondary chaetotaxy in the same instar, and for three genera sharing the character "presence of a these characters the most informative instar is not the adult but of setae". These Allacma pair postantennal genera, the third juvenile instar. The study of such characters involves Borner, 1906, Spatulosminthurus Betsch & Betsch- the clustering of similar characters. A short discussion is given and Sminthurus about this issue (selection of characters and clustering criteria). Pinot, 1984, Latreille, 1804, sensu Betsch & Betsch-Pinot, 1984 were well established, because each one was defined by evolved charac- Résumé ters, making it monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Abundance of Springtails (Insecta: Collembola) in Native and Restored Tallgrass Prairies
    Am. Midl. Nat. 139:235±242 Diversity and Abundance of Springtails (Insecta: Collembola) in Native and Restored Tallgrass Prairies RAYMOND H. BRAND AND CHRISTOPHER P. DUNN The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, Illinois 60532-1293 ABSTRACT.ÐThis study suggests that heterotrophic components of prairie ecosystems can be used with autotrophic components to assess the degree to which a restored prairie ap- proaches the biotic complexity of a native prairie. Springtails (Collembola) were collected from prairie vegetation and litter samples from 13 prairie sites (seven native and six restored) located in southwestern Michigan and northeastern Illinois. The diversity and abundance of these insects and the plant and litter biomass were compared. There were 27 different taxa of springtails in the 225 samples collected. Native prairies had the greatest species richness with 26 species. The oldest restored prairie had 17 species. Three common species were Hypogastrura boletivora, Isotoma viridis, and Lepidocyrtus pallidus. Neanura muscorum, Xenylla grisea, and Pseuduosinella rolfsi were rare. Tomocerus ¯avescens was found primarily in native prairies with only one occurrence in the oldest restored prairie in this study. Native prairies and restored prairies of 17 and 24 yr did not differ signi®cantly in numbers of springtails. Differences in springtail numbers did occur, however, between restored prairies of ,6yr and native prairies, and between younger (,6 yr) and older (17 and 26 yr) restored prairies. An analysis of plant and litter biomass indicated signi®cant differences among the prairie sites sampled. These results suggest that all components of the prairie ecosystem are useful for making restoration management decisions.
    [Show full text]