DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenneth R. Haslam, MD Polyamory Collection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenneth R. Haslam, MD Polyamory Collection Kenneth R. Haslam, MD Polyamory Collection Filed Under: Finding aid is saved on the “P” drive at: P:\LIBRARY LIBRARY\FindingAids\Haslam\Haslam.Polyamory.Finding Aid Full Name: Kenneth R. Haslam, MD Date(s) Materials Received: 2005-2013 Status: Finding aid in process. Started by Leigh Lafosse, continued by Lauren Patton, Erin Dobias, and Taylor Dean under supervision of Liana Zhou. Description: Paper, audio-visual materials, computer files, and photographs contained in 10 boxes. Provenance: Materials were donated to the Kinsey Institute by Dr. Ken Haslam in December 2005, February 2006, May 2007, June 2007, October 2008, February 2009, November 2010, March 2011, January 2012, February 2012, January 2013, . Contributions from other donors sent from 2006-2009, additional information can be found in “Polyamory list of donors” saved in P:\LIBRARY\LIBRARY \Polyamory Collection\Polyamory list of donations 2.08.doc Terms of Use: All users must sign a confidentiality agreement before accessing the materials. User access restricted on Deleware Valley Synergy Member Restricted Lists, Box 10, Folder 43. Please consult the Kinsey Institute photocopying policy. Subject Listing: Polyamory, non-monogamy, relationships, jealousy, swinging, sex behavior research Abstract: The Kenneth R. Haslam, MD collection at The Kinsey Institute contains materials related to polyamory. It consists of conference materials, Internet resources, media coverage, and research articles, as well as Dr Haslam’s personal correspondence and papers originally delivered at poly-oriented meetings, sex research and sex therapy conferences. Additionally, there are materials from several other donors relating to research, media response, and community communications and publications. The bulk of the collection represents the work of Dr. Haslam and other poly-activists from 2000 to the present, with contributions from earlier polyamory writers and activists dating from the 1970’s. Dr. Haslam’s decision to develop the polyamory collection at The Kinsey Institute reflects his interest in providing information and educating the public about polyamorous relationships. The collection includes biographical information about Kenneth Haslam, who has been a leader in organizing and documenting the polyamory community, and in introducing polyamory into the academic sphere. Dr. Haslam’s presentations, featured in this collection, are geared towards educating professionals, 1 practitioners, the public and the poly-community; they form a framework for understanding polyamory, along with snapshots of the lifestyles and communities. Many different polyamory groups and communities are represented in the collection, including the 1970’s Kerista Community and the Church of All Worlds in the U.S., and international materials, such as Dutch language publications from The Netherlands. The collection also contains newsletters that were the precursors of Loving More magazine, a complete collection of Loving More magazine. The vast array of Internet community resources includes list-servs, blogs and journals, and websites. Examples are archives of the website “Polyamorous Percolations,” “Swingercast,” the swingers’ podcast, Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness materials, and archives of various web-based discussion groups. There is a polyamory bibliography containing a variety of materials, including books on the subject that are held by the Kinsey Institute. Collection Scope and Content: The Ken Haslam collection is contained in nine boxes. Series I – III consist solely of items donated by Kenneth R. Haslam, MD, including polyamory research collected by Dr. Haslam, which includes articles, media coverage, and subject specific materials within polyamory research (See appendix 1, 2, and 3 for a complete inventory of computer files); Series IV – VII are comprised of collections from individual donors all on the subject of polyamory. Series VIII consists of two boxes of audiovisual materials on the subject of polyamory donated by Kenneth R. Haslam, MD and Dr. Deborah Anapol. Series IX includes other miscellaneous items including oversized items in mailing tubes donated by several members of the polyamory community. Series X consists of all materials received after 2010. Series I) Biographical Series II) Presentations, Research, and Writings on Polyamory Series III) Correspondence Series IV) Media Coverage Series V) Diaries and Personal Items Series VI) Community Resources Series VII) Serial Publications Series VIII) Audio-Visual Materials Series IX) Miscellaneous and Oversized Series X) Additional Materials Biography: Ken Haslam, MD is a retired anesthesiologist who for the past ten years has been living and teaching about responsible, ethical, and consensual multi-partnering or Polyamory. He is a founding member and currently Vice President of Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness, a board member of the Institute for 21st Century Relationships and a past board member of his Unitarian fellowship. He has presented many workshops, sermons, and lectures on Polyamory, such as “Kinsey and the Roots of Polyamory” at Loving More and “Polyamory Enters the Mainstream at AASECT. He is both a practicing Poly and a Poly activist. Box 1 Series I) Biographical This series contains biographical information of Kenneth R. Haslam, MD and other donors involved in the polyamory collection. A. Biographical Folder 1: 2 Contains multiple biographical summaries of Kenneth R. Haslam, MD and curriculum vitae. Folder also includes itinerary and description of Dr. Haslam’s visit to the Kinsey Institute in April 2006. (ca. 15 pages) Biographical information and publication information for Dr. Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli (ca. 8 pages) Biographical and publication information about Dr. Joy Davidson (3 pages.) B. Interviews and AV The Kenneth R. Haslam MD Collection currently contains two video recordings of KI interviews with Dr. Haslam in Feb. 2006 (interviewed by Raina Polivka) and Dec. 2006 (interviewed by Leigh Lafosse). Also includes a video recording of the lecture delivered by Dr. Haslam to the Kinsey Institute in Feb. 2006. (recorded by Raina Polivka) All of these materials are located with the KI Oral History Project. Series II) Presentations, Research, and Writings on Polyamory This series contains presentations, lectures, notes, workshops, articles, and other writings related to polyamory and sexuality. Folders 4 and 5 contain hard copies of materials that were found on the CDs donated by Dr. Haslam, located in Folder 1. There is a large blue binder labeled “Polyamory Survey August 2001” containing data on a polyamory survey conducted for Loving More by International Communications Research in August 2001. This data is also available electronically via http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/Nearing.html See Appendix 1 for a complete listing of files located on “Haslam CD 12/7/05.” See Appendix 2 for a complete listing of files located on “Haslam CD 2/13/06.” See Appendix 3 for a summary of files located on “Haslam 2007 part 1 misc. poly documents.” Folder 1: Contains three CD’s. One is dated as 12/7/05 (donation date) and is organized with the exact structure of the Ken Haslam computer files. The second CD is dated 2/13/06 (donation date) and contains updates from the Haslam computer files. The third was donated in 2007 and contains updated Haslam computer files. Folder 2: Lectures, presentations, and notes created and collected by Kenneth R. Haslam, MD. AASECT presentation: Confessions of a Polyamorous Geezer: (May 2004) and notes AASECT presentation: (Nov 2005: 22 slides) AASECT pre-con (first polyamory workshop) details in Contemporary Sexuality v. 40, no. 3 Mar 2006 AASECT annual conference (June 2006) abstract presentation: “Polyamory Enters the Mainstream” AASECT conference (Jul 2006) presentation powerpoint slides: “Beyond Monogamy: Varieties of Loving and Committing” by Nan Wise, Margaret Nichols, Michael Shernoff AASECT conference (Jul 2006) presentation powerpoint slides: “Polyamory and other forms of negotiated non-monogamy: a crash course for the curious” by Nan Wise Are SOR’s good for you? (Fleckerstein: SSSS, April 24, 2003: 37 slides) Beltaine Lecture: (May 2001) Confessions of a Failed Serial Monogamist (12 slides) 3 Del otro la’O in Mayaquez, Puerto Rico (Mar 2006) presentation: “Polyamory: Having Your Kate and Edith Too” Correspondence regarding presentation at Del otro la’O between Dr. Haslam and Isabel Rios Torres, 2/2/2007 Del otro la’O (Mar 2006) program/schedule ER Presentation-Hall: (Hall;Fleckenstein, Keeton. SSSS-ER Meeting, April 2003: 12 slides) ERPresentation2 (Hall: 30 slides) Everything I Know I Learned in Kindergarten (20 slides) General Assembly (June 2005) Heretic Lecture (2003: 96 slides) Introduction to OWL program at Davies Memorial Loving More West (June 2006) presentation: “Lovespeak: Making the Connection” Loving More West (June 2006) Keynote Address power point slides: “Kinsey and the Roots of Polyamory” Mainstream Religion (7 slides) Polyamory Lecture (Mar 2003) Poly Living 2005 Conference discussion topic: “Balancing Individuality and Partnership” Poly Living (Feb 2005) program Poly Living West schedule (June 2006) Poly Living program, Philadelphia, PA (Feb 2006) Poly Living (Feb 2006) presentation: “Resolving jealousy in Polyamorous Relationships” Random thoughts on Poly 1 (7 slides) Religion (7 slides) Sermon 2003 Seven Pillars of Polyamory (14 slides) Swingers Polys and Swolys (8 slides) Swingers Presentation 2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LGBTQ America: a Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History Is a Publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service
    Published online 2016 www.nps.gov/subjects/tellingallamericansstories/lgbtqthemestudy.htm LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History is a publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service. We are very grateful for the generous support of the Gill Foundation, which has made this publication possible. The views and conclusions contained in the essays are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. © 2016 National Park Foundation Washington, DC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced without permission from the publishers. Links (URLs) to websites referenced in this document were accurate at the time of publication. THEMES The chapters in this section take themes as their starting points. They explore different aspects of LGBTQ history and heritage, tying them to specific places across the country. They include examinations of LGBTQ community, civil rights, the law, health, art and artists, commerce, the military, sports and leisure, and sex, love, and relationships. MAKING COMMUNITY: THE PLACES AND15 SPACES OF LGBTQ COLLECTIVE IDENTITY FORMATION Christina B. Hanhardt Introduction In the summer of 2012, posters reading "MORE GRINDR=FEWER GAY BARS” appeared taped to signposts in numerous gay neighborhoods in North America—from Greenwich Village in New York City to Davie Village in Vancouver, Canada.1 The signs expressed a brewing fear: that the popularity of online lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) social media—like Grindr, which connects gay men based on proximate location—would soon replace the bricks-and-mortar institutions that had long facilitated LGBTQ community building.
    [Show full text]
  • Allies (Like You!) Are a Vital Believe That We Exist
    how to be an Learn More What is Bi+? Bisexual Resource Center The BRC uses “bisexual” and “bi+” as umbrella terms for people who recognize and honor their Brochures, handouts, links to research, find bi+ potential for sexual and emotional attraction groups: to more than one gender (pansexual, fluid, www.biresource.org omnisexual, queer, and all other free-identifiers). We celebrate and affirm the diversity of identity Bisexual Health Awareness Month and expression regardless of labels. to a bi+ person Learn about bi+ health disparities at www.bihealthmonth.org Our Vision The Bisexual Resource Center envisions a world Bi Women Quarterly where love is celebrated, regardless of sexual Read essays, fiction, poems, and see visual art from orientation or gender expression. Because bisexuals bi+ women around the world: today are still misunderstood, marginalized and www.biwomenboston.org/newsletter discriminated against, the BRC is committed to providing support to the bisexual community and Still Bisexual raising public awareness about bisexuality and Watch videos of people telling their own bi+ bisexual people. stories: www.stillbisexual.com How to Support Us The BiCast A bi+ podcast: www.thebicast.org The BRC is primarily funded through the generosity of our donors. There are many ways you can give. BiNet USA Website: www.biresource.org/donate Learn more about this national bi+ organization: Paypal: [email protected] www.binetusa.org Venmo: @bisexualresourcecenter Bisexual Organizing Project Want to volunteer your time? Email us at Hosts the BECAUSE conference and hosts groups [email protected] in Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN: www.bisexualorganizingproject.org © 2018 Bisexual Resource Center PO Box 170796 Boston, MA 02117 American Institute of Bisexuality 617.424.9595 | www.biresource.org www.americaninstituteofbisexuality.org The Bisexual Resource Center is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) educational organization incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Asexuality 101
    BY THE NUMBERS Asexual people (or aces) experience little or no 28% sexual attraction. While most asexual people desire emotionally intimate relationships, they are not drawn to sex as a way to express that intimacy. of the community is 18 or younger ASEXUALITY ISN’T ACES MIGHT 32% Abstinence because of Want friendship, a bad relationship understanding, and Abstinence because of empathy religious reasons Fall in love of the community are between 19 and 21 Celibacy Experience arousal and Sexual repression, orgasm aversion, or Masturbate 19% dysfunction Have sex Loss of libido due to Not have sex age or circumstance Be of any gender, age, Fear of intimacy or background of the community are currently Inability to find a Have a spouse and/or in high school partner children 40% of the community are in college Aromantic – people who experience little or no romantic 20% attraction and are content with close friendships and other non-romantic relationships. Demisexual – people who only experience sexual attraction of the community identify as once they form a strong emotional connection with the person. transgender or are questioning Grey-A – people who identify somewhere between sexual and their gender identity asexual on the sexuality spectrum. 41% Queerplatonic – One type of non-romantic relationship where there is an intense emotional connection going beyond what is traditionally thought of as friendship. Romantic orientations – Aces commonly use hetero-, homo-, of the community identify as part of the LGBT community bi-, and pan- in front of the word romantic to describe who they experience romantic attraction to. Source: Asexy Community Census http://www.tinyurl.com/AsexyCensusResults Asexual Awareness Week Community Engagement Series – Trevor Project | Last Updated April 2012 ACE SPECIFIC Feeling e mpty, isolated, Some aces voice a fear of ISSUES and/or alone.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL 04, NUM 17.Indd
    “WISCONSIN” FROM SEVENTH PAGE who may not realize that marriage is already heterosexually defined. To say that this is a gay marriage amendment is grossly erroneous. In State of fact, this proposed amendment seeks to make it permanently impossible for us to ever seek civil unions or gay marriage. The proposed ban takes away rights—rights we do not even have. If our Disunion opposition succeeds, this will be the first time that PERCENT OF discrimination has gone into our state constitution. EQUAL RIGHTS YEAR OF OPENLY But our opposition will not succeed. I have GAY/LESBIAN been volunteering and working on this campaign AMERICA’S FIRST OCTOBER 2006 VOL. 4 NO. 17 DEATH SENTENCE STUDENTS for three years not because I have an altruistic that are forced to drop nature, but because I hold the stubborn conviction for sodomy: 1625 out: that fairness can prevail through successfully 28 combating ignorance. If I had thought defeating YEAR THAT this hate legislation was impossible, there is no way NUMBER OF I would have kept coming back. But I am grateful AMERICA’S FIRST SODOMY LAW REPORTED HATE that I have kept coming back because now I can be CRIMES a part of history. On November 7, turn a queer eye was enacted: 1636 in 2004 based on towards Wisconsin and watch the tables turn on the sexual orientation: conservative movement. We may be the first state to 1201 defeat an amendment like this, but I’ll be damned if YEAR THE US we’ll be the last. • SUPREME COURT ruled sodomy laws DATE THAT JERRY unconstitutional: FALWELL BLAMED A PINK EDITORIAL 2003 9/11 on homosexuals, pagans, merica is at another crossroads in its Right now, America is at war with Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Penumbras, Privacy, and the Death of Morals-Based Legislation: Comparing U.S
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 1 2003 Article 12 Penumbras, Privacy, and the Death of Morals-Based Legislation: Comparing U.S. Constitutional Law with the Inherent Right of Privacy in Islamic Jurisprudence Seema Saifee∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Penumbras, Privacy, and the Death of Morals-Based Legislation: Comparing U.S. Constitutional Law with the Inherent Right of Privacy in Islamic Jurisprudence Seema Saifee Abstract In an effort to separate the Islamic regulatory scheme with respect to the criminalization of consensual sexual conduct from the caricature espoused by many Western thinkers, this Note pro- vides a comparative analysis of the criminalization of private consensual sexual conduct in Islamic law and U.S. constitutional jurisprudence on the right of privacy. Part I provides a brief background of Islamic and U.S. criminal regulations on consensual sex and outlines the evolution of consti- tutional privacy jurisprudence in the U.S. Supreme Court. Part II first examines the evidentiary and procedural requirements pertaining to the criminalization of consensual sexual intercourse in Islamic law, explores the consequences of transgressing these evidentiary requirements, and ana- lyzes the theological and privacy-related constraints on initiating suits for engaging in such private conduct. Part II then applies these regulations to the recent case of Amina Lawal in northern Nigeria, and analyzes Islamic regulations governing sexual activity not amounting to intercourse. Finally, Part II examines an alternative reading of the U.S. Supreme Court’s current analysis of privacy as articulated in Lawrence v.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Human Sexuality: Sexuality Across the Lifespan Adulthood/Male and Female Sexuality
    Most people print off a copy of the post test and circle the answers as they read through the materials. Then, you can log in, go to "My Account" and under "Courses I Need to Take" click on the blue "Enter Answers" button. After completing the post test, you can print your certificate. Topics in Human Sexuality: Sexuality Across the Lifespan Adulthood/Male and Female Sexuality Introduction The development of sexuality is a lifelong process that begins in infancy. As we move from infancy to adolescence and adolescence to adulthood, there are many sexual milestones. While adolescent sexuality is a time in which sexual maturation, interest and experience surge, adult sexuality continues to be a time of sexual unfolding. It is during this time that people consolidate their sexual orientation and enter into their first mature, and often long term, sexual relationships. This movement towards mature sexuality also has a number of gender-specific issues as males and females often experience sexuality differently. As people age, these differences are often marked. In addition to young and middle age adults, the elderly are often an overlooked group when it comes to discussion of sexuality. Sexuality, however, continues well into what are often considered the golden years. This course will review the development of sexuality using a lifespan perspective. It will focus on sexuality in adulthood and in the elderly. It will discuss physical and psychological milestones connected with adult sexuality. Educational Objectives 1. Discuss the process of attaining sexual maturity, including milestones 2. Compare and contrast remaining singles, getting married and cohabitating 3.
    [Show full text]
  • "Hooking Up" and Hanging Out: Casual Sexual Behavior Among Adolescents and Young Adults Today1
    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. FCS2279 "Hooking Up" and Hanging Out: Casual Sexual Behavior Among Adolescents and Young Adults Today1 Christy Daniel and Kate Fogarty2 Current Trends in Adolescent and Young Adults' Sexuality Adolescents' and young adults' sexual attitudes and behaviors have gotten a lot of attention from researchers, the media, and policy makers in the past decade. Trends show a decline in traditional forms of dating, suggesting that casual sexual interaction, often referred to as "hooking up," has become an alternative to traditional exclusive sexual relationships. Hook-ups are sexual encounters ranging from kissing to sexual intercourse. They are often within the context of a dating relationship short-lived, nonexclusive, and emotionally (Manning, Giordano, & Longmore, 2005), more shallow, with a purpose of one-time sexual than 60% of sexually active teenagers will activity (Glenn & Marquardt, 2001). The terms eventually have sex with someone they are not "friends with benefits" and "casual sex" are also dating (Manning, Giordano, & Longmore, used as synonyms for hooking up (Glenn & 2006). One study found that approximately 87% Marquardt, 2001). of college students reported hooking up at some point in their lives (Kahn, Fricker, Hoffman, Adolescent Sexual Experiences Lambert, Tripp, & Childress, 2000). Additionally, more than one-half of the men and Although research has found that most teenagers one-third of the women in the study reported (roughly 75%) have their first sexual experience having intercourse during their hook-up (Lambert, Kahn, & Apple, 2003). 1. This document is FCS2279, one of a series of the Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Differences in Affective Responses to Homoerotic Stimuli: Evidence for an Unconscious Bias Among Heterosexual Men, but Not Heterosexual Women
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 5, October 2005, pp. 537–545 (C 2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10508-005-6279-4 Sex Differences in Affective Responses to Homoerotic Stimuli: Evidence for an Unconscious Bias Among Heterosexual Men, but not Heterosexual Women Amanda L. Mahaffey, M.A.,1,2 Angela Bryan, Ph.D.,1 and Kent E. Hutchison, Ph.D.1 Received February 25, 2004; revisions received June 25, 2004 and August 24, 2004; accepted October 30, 2004 Antigay bias is a well-documented social problem among heterosexual men, though heterosexual women display a lesser tendency toward this bias. Startle eye blink has been established as a valid measure of the affective component of antigay bias in heterosexual men. In the current study, a sample of 91 heterosexual women and 87 heterosexual men were exposed to a variety of sexual photographic stimuli accompanied by startle probes. Heterosexual men who expressed more bias against gay men using a social distance measure (i.e., discomfort with being in close quarters with a gay man) displayed a startle response consistent with greater negative affect (e.g., fear and disgust) toward gay male stimuli, while those with less self-reported antigay bias did not display a physiological bias against gay men, and none of these men showed a relationship between bias against lesbians and physiological responses while viewing lesbian images. There were no such physiological manifestations of antigay bias in heterosexual women while viewing lesbian or gay male images, even among those who self-reported such bias. It appears that heterosexual women do not tend to have the same affective response toward homosexuals that some heterosexual men experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Masturbation Practices of Males and Females
    Journal of Sex Research ISSN: 0022-4499 (Print) 1559-8519 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hjsr20 Masturbation practices of males and females Ibtihaj S. Arafat & Wayne L. Cotton To cite this article: Ibtihaj S. Arafat & Wayne L. Cotton (1974) Masturbation practices of males and females, Journal of Sex Research, 10:4, 293-307, DOI: 10.1080/00224497409550863 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224497409550863 Published online: 11 Jan 2010. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 549 View related articles Citing articles: 44 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hjsr20 The Journal of Sex Research Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 293—307 November, 1974 Masturbation Practices of Males and Females IBTIHAJ S. ARAFAT AND WAYNE L. COTTON Abstract In this study, the authors have examined the masturbation practices of both male and female college students, attempting to test some of the premises long held that men and women differ significantly in such prac- tices. The findings indicate that while there are differences in many of the variables examined, there are others which show striking similarities. Thus, they open to question a number of assumptions held regarding differences in sexual needs and responses of males and females. Introduction The theoretical framework for this study has its basis in the early studies of Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin (1948). These first studies sought to document factually and statistically masturbation practices in this country. Though innovative, these studies have become out- dated and limited in light of contemporary developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Homophobia and Transphobia Illumination Project Curriculum
    Homophobia and Transphobia Illumination Project Curriculum Andrew S. Forshee, Ph.D., Early Education & Family Studies Portland Community College Portland, Oregon INTRODUCTION Homophobia and transphobia are complicated topics that touch on core identity issues. Most people tend to conflate sexual orientation with gender identity, thus confusing two social distinctions. Understanding the differences between these concepts provides an opportunity to build personal knowledge, enhance skills in allyship, and effect positive social change. GROUND RULES (10­15 minutes) Materials: chart paper, markers, tape. Due to the nature of the topic area, it is essential to develop ground rules for each student to follow. Ask students to offer some rules for participation in the post­performance workshop (i.e., what would help them participate to their fullest). Attempt to obtain a group consensus before adopting them as the official “social contract” of the group. Useful guidelines include the following (Bonner Curriculum, 2009; Hardiman, Jackson, & Griffin, 2007): Respect each viewpoint, opinion, and experience. Use “I” statements – avoid speaking in generalities. The conversations in the class are confidential (do not share information outside of class). Set own boundaries for sharing. Share air time. Listen respectfully. No blaming or scapegoating. Focus on own learning. Reference to PCC Student Rights and Responsibilities: http://www.pcc.edu/about/policy/student­rights/student­rights.pdf DEFINING THE CONCEPTS (see Appendix A for specific exercise) An active “toolkit” of terminology helps support the ongoing dialogue, questioning, and understanding about issues of homophobia and transphobia. Clear definitions also provide a context and platform for discussion. Homophobia: a psychological term originally developed by Weinberg (1973) to define an irrational hatred, anxiety, and or fear of homosexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Eros, Storge, Phileo, and Agape
    Eros, Storge, Phileo, and Agape INTRODUCTION II. Storge Love is ambiguous in the English language. A. This is natural affection—family, kin, the There is “Strawberry Shortcake Love.” We love humblest of loves. We love each other simply cats, dogs, and ice cream. This is trite and with- because we are of the family. B. It is negative in Romans 1:31 and 2 Timothy out depth or permanence. There is “Aunt Minnie 3:3, used regarding homosexuals. Love” which is reserved for “special” people C. It is used in withdrawal in 2 Timothy 3:14, 15. who are sweet and lovable. Sometimes it is con- Withdrawal is not excommunication, put- descending. There is “Bowling Team Love” for ting one out of the church. It is what it says, “buddies” in a reciprocal way. Moderns do not withdrawal of fellowship. zero in on “Tough Love.” So there is a Greek word study. However, the III. Phileo Bible is not learned in a seminary; it is learned A. This is tender affection and brotherly love. out on the street with people in local work. (Philadelphia is the city of “brotherly love.”) Footnotes will not preach. Also, the Bible must B. However, sometimes we make too clear a not be reduced to word studies. You can get so distinction between phileo and agape. Be care- ful. There are surprises. Read Titus 2:3, 4; far out on a limb looking at a leaf you forget the Romans 12:9, 10; 1 Corinthians 16:22; He- tree. Word studies can be helpful, but they can brews 13:1; John 16:27; and 1 Peter 1:22.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: an Argument from Bisexuality
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2012 Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality Michael Boucai University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Michael Boucai, Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality, 49 San Diego L. Rev. 415 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/66 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality MICHAEL BOUCAI* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................416 II. SEXUAL LIBERTY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE .............................. 421 A. A Right To Choose Homosexual Relations and Relationships.........................................421 B. Marriage'sBurden on the Right............................426 1. Disciplineor Punishment?.... 429 2. The Burden's Substance and Magnitude. ................... 432 III. BISEXUALITY AND MARRIAGE.. .........................................
    [Show full text]