Soundscapes of the Urban Past

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soundscapes of the Urban Past Sound Studies Series Series edited by Holger Schulze Volume 5 Editorial Board Sam Auinger (Linz/Berlin) Diedrich Diederichsen (Wien/Berlin) Florian Dombois (Bern) Sabine Fabo (Aachen) Peter Kiefer (Mainz) Doris Kolesch (Berlin) Elena Ungeheuer (Berlin) Christoph Wulf (Berlin) Sound Studies The book series Sound Studies presents research results, studies and essays on a rather new yet well-known field of research: How do human beings and animals and things live together with all the sounds and noises, tones and signals of their times? How do they shape and design sounds – and how do they act through sounds and explore their world, even in foreign or in maybe only superficially known cultures? The research field of Sound Studies is transdiciplinary and transmethodologically by na- ture: the publications of this book series therefore present artistic and design concepts from fields such as sound art, composition, performance art, conceptual art and popu- lar culture as well as articles from disciplines such as cultural studies, communication studies, ethnography and cultural anthropology, music studies, art history and literary studies. Artistic research as a whole is therefore an important approach in the field of sound studies. The Sound Studies book series intends to open up a discourse in, on and about sound – across the boundaries of academic disciplines and methods of research and artistic invention: a speaking about sound beyond the hitherto alltoo well-known academic discourse. Series editor: Holger Schulze A publication of the Sound Studies Lab at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative ini- tiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 (BY-NC-ND). which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2013 trancript Verlag, Bielefeld All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover image: Moniek Wegdam, Dam, Amsterdam, February 13, 2012 Editorial Staff: Georg Spehr, Berlin Cover layout & typeset: Christina Giakoumelou, Athens Printed by Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar ISBN 978-3-8376-2179-2 Karin Bijsterveld (ed.) Soundscapes of the Urban Past. Staged Sound as Mediated Cultural Heritage Contents 11 Introduction Karin Bijsterveld 31 Shifting Sounds. Textualization and Dramatization of Urban Soundscapes Karin Bijsterveld, Annelies Jacobs, Jasper Aalbers and Andreas Fickers 67 Why Historians of the Auditory Urban Past Might Consider Getting Their Ears Wet Mark M. Smith 77 Sounds Familiar. Intermediality and Remediation in the Written, Sonic and Audiovisual Narratives of Berlin Alexanderplatz Andreas Fickers, Jasper Aalbers, Annelies Jacobs and Karin Bijsterveld 117 The Chirping of a Little Bird. Some (Film) Theoretical Reflections Patricia Pisters 129 Sonic Artefacts. Reality Codes of Urbanity in Early German Radio Documentary Carolyn Birdsall 169 Radio Documentary and the Formation of Urban Aesthetics Evi Karathanasopoulou and Andrew Crisell 181 Soundscape, Landscape, Escape Jonathan Sterne 195 The Corporeality of Listening. Experiencing Soundscapes on Audio Guides Holger Schulze 209 The Eleventh of the Eleventh of the Eleventh. The Theatre of Memorial Silence Ross Brown 221 Authors 227 List of Illustrations Introduction Karin Bijsterveld 1. »Take a Closer Listen« It happened when his Ipod was out of batteries. Lying in a park in Geneva, on a mid- summer day, with his headphones still on, he suddenly heard the sounds of the park as if played on his Ipod: people talking, a dog barking, a truck passing, kids laughing, birds singing. The idea for a book was born. Artist Rutger Zuyderfelt invited people to »take a closer listen« to the sounds that normally go unnoticed to them, and asked them to think of their »favourite sound«. By the end of 2009, he had gathered fifty-two detailed descriptions of sounds, as well as a few accompanying stories. 1 Many of the sounds submitted were those of nature: the »flapping of birds’ wings«, or »wind blowing through trees«. Some were sounds of nature audible in enclosed, man-made spaces, like »rain falling on a tent’s roof« and »snow lightly hitting a glass window«. Other stories just referred to the sounds of people talking or things moving: »neighbours’ muffled conversation«, »umbrellas opening and closing« or a »far-off fog- horn from a ship at sea«. Still others, however, referred to the sounds of crowded, urban environments such as »rumbling train engines«, »constant traffic on a distant road«, a »busy playground several yards away«, or »echoes in a tube station«. And some seemed to be associated with joyful expectation, such as »mail falling on a doormat«, »a new pack of coffee being opened« and »a book page being turned«. 2 Some seven decades before, in the mid-1930s, residents of the city of Groningen, The Netherlands were also invited to take a closer listen. The organization involved was a 1 Zuyderfelt 2009, 3, 5, 7. 2 Zuyderfelt 2009, 10-73. 11 local noise abatement committee, one similar to those established in many other West- ern towns and cities in the first decades of the twentieth century, including New York, London and Berlin, to mention a few metropolitan examples.3 The Groningen committee publicly announced its plan to take action against unnecessary noise, and asked local residents to provide information on the sounds they considered annoying. This triggered a response of over one hundred letters.4 Most of the letter-writers complained about »street noise«, notably the sounds of the horns and engines of cars, trucks and motor bikes, but also the noises of municipal street cleaning services, carts, trams, trolley bus- es, trains, and people loading and unloading cargo. Others felt bothered by the sounds of local tower carillons, factories and steam whistles, street vendors, public loudspeak- ers, soldiers doing firing exercises, children, dogs, cats and cocks. Quite a few also had concerns about the loudness of their neighbours’ radio. The complainants often stressed the incessant and »piercing« character of the un- wanted sounds, their sheer multitude, as well as their untimely nature: a »screaming army« of flower vendors, rag-dealers and iron mongers passing through the street »day and night«. Each morning, a family woke up far too early due to milk factory workers »throwing with« their milk »tins« and »lids«. Other commercial activities, such as the outdoor second-hand car market, would start as early as in the middle of the night, with »slamming car doors« and »endless« starting up of engines »in vain«, for not all cars offered for sale there were »of the modern kind«. Motorized traffic contributed to the hubbub, but so did the numerous carts delivering milk or vegetables, which had »no rubber tires« while the street pavement was rather »uneven«. In their letters, the writers also voiced medical concerns (»I have been seeing the doctor for over a year now and suffer a lot from nervousness«) or claimed that »the sick« in their family could not stand the noise anymore, hoping that the committee’s members could do some- thing about it. Furthermore, the noise of motor bikes, driven up and down the road by the neighbourhood street kids (sons of the »knife-grinders and oil millers« and a few »pimps«) would cause houses to »shake«, while the drone of electric engines felt, as one letter put it, »as if my brain begins to tremble«. Hospital patients, one writer knew, suffered from sleep disturbance caused by a local carillon, as was true of »strangers visiting our town for just a few days«. The city was overcrowded with »twitter bicycles«, 3 Bijsterveld 2008. 4 Archives Anti-lawaai comité Groningen (ALCG, Noise Abatement Committee Groningen), File »Brieven op Persberichten« (Letters in response to Press Reports), 1935-1937; courtesy Hero Wit, now stored at Maastricht University, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences. The committee itself numbered the letters to which we refer. 12 Introduction »car din« and an outright »chaos of sounds«. One complainant regretted that those from the nearby countryside (»buitenmenschen«) would often go into Groningen very early, at a time when the urban residents (»stadjers«) were still sound asleep, »as they go to bed later«. Another contended that it was usually »lower-class lads and girls« who felt a need to scream and yell.5 We do not present these examples to suggest that urban dwellers’ appreciation of ur- ban sound used to be more negative in the past than it is today. It might have been just as easy to find negative stories about present-day urban sounds, or, conversely, positive ones about such sounds in the past. Rather, our interest is in how these stories are staged. Intriguingly, many of the stories about favourite sounds generally speak of sounds that are hardly discernible, such as muffled sounds or lightly tapping ones. These sounds also tend to be produced at a certain distance from the listener: far-off, several yards away, amounting to echoes rather than the real thing. We classify them as typical instances of the »comforting sound« topos, a description or staging of sound which foregrounds people’s experience of safety, a calm atmosphere, a sense of secu- rity.
Recommended publications
  • Barn G Stables 57-78 on Account of SMYTZER's LODGE, Gnarwarre
    Barn G Stables 57-78 On Account of SMYTZER'S LODGE, Gnarwarre. Lot 281 BAY COLT 10 (Branded nr sh. 4 off sh. Foaled 12th November, 2004.) Danehill........................... by Danzig ....................... (SIRE) Danehill Dancer (Ire) ...... Mira Adonde ................... by Sharpen Up ................ CHOISIR....................... Lunchtime (GB) .............. by Silly Season ............... Great Selection ............... Pensive Mood.................. by Biscay........................ (DAM) Hethersett........................ by Hugh Lupus ............... Blakeney......................... PERCY'S GIRL (IRE).. Windmill Girl.................. by Hornbeam .................. 1988 Sassafras.......................... by Sheshoon.................... Laughing Girl.................. Violetta ........................... by Pinza.......................... By CHOISIR (Ch., 1999) Champion 2YO Colt 2001/02, 3YO Sprinter 2002/03; won 7 races and $2,230,033 inc. Royal Ascot Golden Jubilee S. Gr 1, VRC Lightning S. Gr 1, Royal Ascot King's Stand S. Gr 2, VRC Emirates Classic Gr 2. 2d Newmarket July Cup Gr 1, AJC Sires' Produce S. Gr 1. 3d STC Golden Slipper S. Gr 1, MRC Caulfield Guineas Gr 1, AJC Champagne S. Gr 1, MRC Oakleigh P. Gr 1; his oldest progeny are yearlings. 1st DAM Percy's Girl (Ire), by Blakeney. 2 wins at 1¼m., 10½f. inc. Sandown Mitre Graduation S. 2d Ayr Doonside Cup L, York Galtres S. L. 4th Newmarket Godolphin S. L. Sister to PERCY'S LASS (dam of SIR PERCY, Blue Lion). Half-sister to BRAISWICK (dam of ICKLINGHAM). This is her ninth foal. Her eighth foal is a 2YO, 4 raced, 3 winners- MISS CORINNE (f by Mark Of Esteem). 5 wins 1500 to 2350m. in Italy. BYSSHE (f by Linamix). 2 wins at 2400, 2600m. in France. PERCY ISLE (c by Doyoun). 1 win at 1½m.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does Art Sound Like? an Exploration of Art Through Sound
    What does Art Sound Like? An exploration of Art through Sound. Developed by: Catherine Ewer Suggested Grade Level(s): 1 –3 Suggested Length of Class Time: One 60-minute class Subject Areas: Visual Art, Language Art Rationale When it comes to artwork, there is generally a lot of focus on “looking with our eyes” but much can be gained by entering further into the creative experience through sound. In this lesson students will study a piece of art and interpret it as an audio experience, adding a whole new creative layer. Children love creating Soundscapes and will enjoy the ingenuity and imagination necessary to “hear” a painting. This is truly a creative group experience in which everyone’s input is valuable. During the creation of the Soundscape there will be a lot of discussion around sounds using descriptive vocabulary, which the students can then draw upon as inspiration to create short written narratives. Logistics: Classroom setup – group class work, individual work at desks Materials – image of one or more paintings, large enough to look at as a class, sound recorder, or device capable of recording sound. Suggested resources/images – online image banks from various art gallery and museum sites; art reproduction posters, individual art postcards, etc. Some suggestions for types of images are landscapes, seascapes, crowd scenes or an image rich in action. Suggested Outcomes: Students will be expected to: - Explore a variety of sound sources - Work together in group music and art making - Experiment with language choices in imaginative writing and other ways of representing - Share writing or other representations with others and seek feedback - With assistance, experiment with technology in writing and other forms of representation - Select, organize, and combine (with assistance) relevant information to construct and communicate meaning Introduction: As a class, look closely at an image and examine every part.
    [Show full text]
  • YEARLING, Consigned by Highclere Stud
    YEARLING, consigned by Highclere Stud Will Stand at Park Paddocks, Highflyer Paddock G, Box 142 Green Desert (USA) Cape Cross (IRE) 400 (WITH VAT) Park Appeal Sea The Stars (IRE) Miswaki (USA) A BAY COLT (IRE) Urban Sea (USA) Allegretta Foaled Mark of Esteem (IRE) February 22nd, 2016 Sir Percy (GB) Coquet (GB) Percy's Lass (2009) One So Marvellous Nashwan (USA) (GB) Someone Special E.B.F. Nominated. B.C. Nominated. 1st Dam COQUET (GB), won 3 races at 2 and 3 years and £50,954 including Height of Fashion Stakes, Goodwood, L. and Mount Nelson EBF Montrose Stakes, Newmarket, L., placed twice including third in Dubai Duty Free Arc Trial, Newbury, Gr.3; dam of 1 foal of racing age viz- Glencadam Master (GB) (2015 c. by Mastercraftsman (IRE)), realised 150,000gns at Tattersalls October Yearling Sale, Book 1, 2016, unraced to date. 2nd Dam ONE SO MARVELLOUS (GB), won 1 race at 3 years and placed once; Own sister to ONE SO WONDERFUL (GB); dam of four winners from 5 runners and 9 foals of racing age including- COQUET (GB) (f. by Sir Percy (GB)), see above. GENIUS BOY (GB), won 5 races at 4 years and £33,701 and placed 5 times. CARTWRIGHT (GB), won 5 races at 3 and 4 years, 2017 and £22,032 and placed once. 3rd Dam Someone Special, won 1 race at 3 years and placed 3 times including third in Coronation Stakes, Royal Ascot, Gr.2 and Venus Fillies Stakes, Kempton Park, L., from only 5 starts; dam of nine winners from 13 runners and 15 foals of racing age including- ONE SO WONDERFUL (GB), Champion older mare in Europe in 1998, won 5 races at 2 to 4 years including Juddmonte International Stakes, York, Gr.1, Equity Collections Sun Chariot Stakes, Newmarket, Gr.2, Atalanta Stakes, Sandown Park, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Bfi London Film Festival Announces New Format For
    BFI LONDON FILM FESTIVAL ANNOUNCES NEW FORMAT FOR 2020 EDITION Virtual LFF & LFF in Cinemas The first ever edition of the Festival to be widely accessible across the UK 50 Virtual Festival Premieres to be enjoyed at home Up to 12 special previews of eagerly anticipated upcoming films screening in cinemas around the UK New Audience Choice Awards introduced for 2020 Edition Free talks, events, short films LONDON – Thursday 2nd July, 2020, 13:00 : The BFI London Film Festival in partnership with American Express today reveals its plans for the upcoming edition of the Festival from 7th-18th October 2020. In the most accessible version of the festival to UK audiences yet, film lovers will be given an opportunity to connect for a unique and innovative festival experience, enjoying both live and digital screenings across the 12 days of the Festival. Adapting to the extraordinary challenges of the year, the Festival will deliver up to 50 Virtual Festival Premieres in a programme that offers audiences the opportunity to see the best new cinema from around the world and with that same texture LFF’s audiences love, including fiction, documentary, animation, artists’ moving image, and restored classics from the world’s archives. Every film will be presented with an intro or Q&A, and the programme will also include a range of free-to-access additional works and events to include: an international short film programme, Screen Talks with major filmmakers and actors, salons and roundtables and a brand new Virtual Exhibition of XR and Immersive Art. Industry and Media delegates will have access to a rich professional programme, also delivered digitally.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 81, September 2014
    Newsletter No. 81 – September 2014 Free to members Chairman’s Report In this Issue: Bob Flanagan • Betts Family There has again been much progress over the last four • Conservation Grave Page 3 months in respect of the negotiations over the future of News Page 3 • the cemetery. Crucially, a way forward on grave re-use Highgate Cem- that would safeguard all pre-Lambeth era monuments has • The Page 4 etery Page 5 been agreed in principle with officers. This has been the • NationalHenry Page Feder- 6 cornerstone of our stance with the council over the years. ation of Cemet- Advice from Counsel for Lambeth is that a joint petition • John Page 9 ery Friends to the Diocesan Chancellor from Lambeth and FOWNC, if properly framed, could well meet with approval. This • Page 6 Tap Page 12 being the case, a submission to the Heritage Lottery Fund • Brockwell Park • Iron Tsar Page 13 could follow quite quickly given that appropriate gover- Clock Tower nance procedures will also be implemented. • ThePage Page8 14 A further advance has • been agreement for at • CemeteryThe War Graves Page least three stages of 14Photographic provision for heritage/ Project Page 9 • Forthcoming education/visitor pro- • EG Honey: the Events Page 15 vision, stage 1 being a Two Minute Lambeth-financed per- • SilenceA Bit of PageMystery 11 manent presence in • LondonPage 16 Asylum the planned Nettlefold Hall cinema complex, for the Deaf and stage 2 being use of a Dumb Page 12 likely increasing amo- • Commander unt of space in the John Cyril Porte existing Lodge, and 3 Page 13 being a commitment • to explore provision of Forthcoming a visitor centre in a Events Page 14 proposed new building • above the catacombs.
    [Show full text]
  • Dec. 22, 2015 Snd. Tech. Album Arch
    SOUND TECHNIQUES RECORDING ARCHIVE (Albums recorded and mixed complete as well as partial mixes and overdubs where noted) Affinity-Affinity S=Trident Studio SOHO, London. (TRACKED AND MIXED: SOUND TECHNIQUES A-RANGE) R=1970 (Vertigo) E=Frank Owen, Robin Geoffrey Cable P=John Anthony SOURCE=Ken Scott, Discogs, Original Album Liner Notes Albion Country Band-Battle of The Field S=Sound Techniques Studio Chelsea, London. (TRACKED AND MIXED: SOUND TECHNIQUES A-RANGE) S=Island Studio, St. Peter’s Square, London (PARTIAL TRACKING) R=1973 (Carthage) E=John Wood P=John Wood SOURCE: Original Album liner notes/Discogs Albion Dance Band-The Prospect Before Us S=Sound Techniques Studio Chelsea, London. (PARTIALLY TRACKED. MIXED: SOUND TECHNIQUES A-RANGE) S=Olympic Studio #1 Studio, Barnes, London (PARTIAL TRACKING) R=Mar.1976 Rel. (Harvest) @ Sound Techniques, Olympic: Tracks 2,5,8,9 and 14 E= Victor Gamm !1 SOUND TECHNIQUES RECORDING ARCHIVE (Albums recorded and mixed complete as well as partial mixes and overdubs where noted) P=Ashley Hutchings and Simon Nicol SOURCE: Original Album liner notes/Discogs Alice Cooper-Muscle of Love S=Sunset Sound Recorders Hollywood, CA. Studio #2. (TRACKED: SOUND TECHNIQUES A-RANGE) S=Record Plant, NYC, A&R Studio NY (OVERDUBS AND MIX) R=1973 (Warner Bros) E=Jack Douglas P=Jack Douglas and Jack Richardson SOURCE: Original Album liner notes, Discogs Alquin-The Mountain Queen S= De Lane Lea Studio Wembley, London (TRACKED AND MIXED: SOUND TECHNIQUES A-RANGE) R= 1973 (Polydor) E= Dick Plant P= Derek Lawrence SOURCE: Original Album Liner Notes, Discogs Al Stewart-Zero She Flies S=Sound Techniques Studio Chelsea, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Turntablism and Audio Art Study 2009
    TURNTABLISM AND AUDIO ART STUDY 2009 May 2009 Radio Policy Broadcasting Directorate CRTC Catalogue No. BC92-71/2009E-PDF ISBN # 978-1-100-13186-3 Contents SUMMARY 1 HISTORY 1.1-Defintion: Turntablism 1.2-A Brief History of DJ Mixing 1.3-Evolution to Turntablism 1.4-Definition: Audio Art 1.5-Continuum: Overlapping definitions for DJs, Turntablists, and Audio Artists 1.6-Popularity of Turntablism and Audio Art 2 BACKGROUND: Campus Radio Policy Reviews, 1999-2000 3 SURVEY 2008 3.1-Method 3.2-Results: Patterns/Trends 3.3-Examples: Pre-recorded music 3.4-Examples: Live performance 4 SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM 4.1-Difficulty with using MAPL System to determine Canadian status 4.2- Canadian Content Regulations and turntablism/audio art CONCLUSION SUMMARY Turntablism and audio art are becoming more common forms of expression on community and campus stations. Turntablism refers to the use of turntables as musical instruments, essentially to alter and manipulate the sound of recorded music. Audio art refers to the arrangement of excerpts of musical selections, fragments of recorded speech, and ‘found sounds’ in unusual and original ways. The following paper outlines past and current difficulties in regulating these newer genres of music. It reports on an examination of programs from 22 community and campus stations across Canada. Given the abstract, experimental, and diverse nature of these programs, it may be difficult to incorporate them into the CRTC’s current music categories and the current MAPL system for Canadian Content. Nonetheless, turntablism and audio art reflect the diversity of Canada’s artistic community.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Recording in the British Folk Revival: Ideology, Discourse and Practice, 1950–1975
    Sound recording in the British folk revival: ideology, discourse and practice, 1950–1975 Matthew Ord Submitted in fulfilment of the degree of PhD International Centre for Music Studies Newcastle University March 2017 Abstract Although recent work in record production studies has advanced scholarly understandings of the contribution of sound recording to musical and social meaning, folk revival scholarship in Britain has yet to benefit from these insights. The revival’s recording practice took in a range of approaches and contexts including radio documentary, commercial studio productions and amateur field recordings. This thesis considers how these practices were mediated by revivalist beliefs and values, how recording was represented in revivalist discourse, and how its semiotic resources were incorporated into multimodal discourses about music, technology and traditional culture. Chapters 1 and 2 consider the role of recording in revivalist constructions of traditional culture and working class communities, contrasting the documentary realism of Topic’s single-mic field recordings with the consciously avant-garde style of the BBC’s Radio Ballads. The remaining three chapters explore how the sound of recorded folk was shaped by a mutually constitutive dialogue with popular music, with recordings constructing traditional performance as an authentic social practice in opposition to an Americanised studio sound equated with commercial/technological mediation. As the discourse of progressive rock elevated recording to an art practice associated with the global counterculture, however, opportunities arose for the incorporation of rock studio techniques in the interpretation of traditional song in the hybrid genre of folk-rock. Changes in studio practice and technical experiments with the semiotics of recorded sound experiments form the subject of the final two chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • LOST for NEARLY a CENTURY LOVE, LIFE and LAUGHTER SCREENS AS BFI LFF’S ARCHIVE SPECIAL PRESENTATION with LIVE MUSICAL ACCOMPANIMENT [3Rd OCTOBER, BFI SOUTHBANK]
    LOST FOR NEARLY A CENTURY LOVE, LIFE AND LAUGHTER SCREENS AS BFI LFF’S ARCHIVE SPECIAL PRESENTATION WITH LIVE MUSICAL ACCOMPANIMENT rd [3 OCTOBER, BFI SOUTHBANK] Tuesday 27 August, 10:30am London – The 63rd BFI London Film Festival in partnership with American Express is thrilled to announce George Pearson’s LOVE, LIFE AND LAUGHTER (1923) as this year’s Archive Special Presentation. Lost for nearly a century, this film was on the BFI 75 Most Wanted list and one of its most sought after titles for decades and has now been carefully restored by the team at the BFI National Archive. Its screening at this year’s Festival gives audiences the chance to fall under the spell of Betty Balfour, Britain’s ‘Queen of Happiness’ and the nation’s biggest star of the 1920s. The presentation will take place at BFI Southbank on Thursday 3rd October, 6.10pm in NFT1 with a live musical accompaniment by Meg Morley as well as an extended introduction by the BFI National Archive’s Silent Curator Bryony Dixon and the BFI’s Film Conservation Manager Kieron Webb. LOVE, LIFE AND LAUGHTER tells the story of a pair of working class youngsters with big dreams – a cheery chorus girl and a serious writer – the film toys with our expectations, blurring the boundaries of reverie and reality, tragedy and comedy. The films aesthetic is extremely evocative of the period, full of Art Deco styling from the overall design to Balfour’s costumes and the film’s set pieces. This restoration is a major event enabling today’s audiences to enjoy a truly vivacious performance from Balfour in one of her key films and adds to our knowledge of director Pearson, often likened to Dickens (whom he admired) for his ability to wring the maximum amount of emotion out of a story and a key figure in British cinema with now only a bare handful of his films survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitchell Brothers – Vaudeville and Western
    Vaudeville and the Last Encore By Marlene Mitchell February, 1992 William Mitchell, his wife Pearl Mitchell, and John Mitchell 1 Vaudeville and the Last Encore By Marlene Mitchell February, 1992 Vaudeville was a favorite pastime for individuals seeking clean entertainment during the early part of the 20th century. The era of vaudeville was relatively short because of the creation of new technology. Vaudeville began around 1881 and began to fade in the early 1930s.1 The term vaudeville originated in France.2 It is thought that the term vaudeville was from “Old French vaudevire, short for chanson du Vaux de Vire, which meant popular satirical songs that were composed and presented during the 15th century in the valleys or vaux near the French town of Vire in the province of Normandy.”3 How did vaudeville begin? What was vaude- ville’s purpose and what caused its eventual collapse? This paper addresses the phenomenon of vaudeville — its rise, its stable but short lifetime, and its demise. Vaudeville was an outgrowth of the Industrial Revolution, which provided jobs for peo- ple and put money in their pockets.4 Because of increased incomes, individuals began to desire and seek clean, family entertainment.5 This desire was first satisfied by Tony Pastor, who is known as the “father of vaudeville.”6 In 1881 Pastor opened “Tony Pastor’s New Fourteenth Street Theatre” and began offering what he called variety entertainment.7 Later B. F. Keith, who is called the “founder of vaudeville,” opened a theater in Boston and expanded on Pastor’s original variety concept.8 Keith was the first to use the term “vaudeville” when he opened his theater in Boston in 1894.9 Keith later joined with E.
    [Show full text]
  • Season 5 Article
    N.B. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE READER USE 2-PAGE VIEW (BOOK FORMAT WITH SCROLLING ENABLED) IN ACROBAT READER OR BROWSER. “EVEN’ING IT OUT – A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE LAST TWO YEARS OF “THE TWILIGHT ZONE” Television Series (minus ‘THE’)” A Study in Three Parts by Andrew Ramage © 2019, The Twilight Zone Museum. All rights reserved. Preface With some hesitation at CBS, Cayuga Productions continued Twilight Zone for what would be its last season, with a thirty-six episode pipeline – a larger count than had been seen since its first year. Producer Bert Granet, who began producing in the previous season, was soon replaced by William Froug as he moved on to other projects. The fifth season has always been considered the weakest and, as one reviewer stated, “undisputably the worst.” Harsh criticism. The lopsidedness of Seasons 4 and 5 – with a smattering of episodes that egregiously deviated from the TZ mold, made for a series much-changed from the one everyone had come to know. A possible reason for this was an abundance of rather disdainful or at least less-likeable characters. Most were simply too hard to warm up to, or at the very least, identify with. But it wasn’t just TZ that was changing. Television was no longer as new a medium. “It was a period of great ferment,” said George Clayton Johnson. By 1963, the idyllic world of the 1950s was disappearing by the day. More grittily realistic and reality-based TV shows were imminent, as per the viewing audience’s demand and it was only a matter of time before the curtain came down on the kinds of shows everyone grew to love in the 50s.
    [Show full text]
  • Staging the Urban Soundscape in Fiction Film
    Echoes of the city : staging the urban soundscape in fiction film Citation for published version (APA): Aalbers, J. F. W. (2013). Echoes of the city : staging the urban soundscape in fiction film. Maastricht University. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20131213ja Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2013 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20131213ja Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]