DEPARTMENT-STORE EDUCATION R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DEPARTMENT-STORE EDUCATION R DEPARTMENT OF.TFIE INTERIOR BUREAU OF EDUCATION BULLETIN, 1917, No.9 I ek DEPARTMENT-STOREEDUCATIONr AN ACCOUNT OF THETRAINING METHODS DEVELOPED AT THE BOSTON SCHOOLOF SALESMANSHIP UNDER THE DIRECTION OF LUCINDAWYMAN PRINCE BY HELEN RICH NORTON 1 ASSOCIATE DIRgCTOR, SCHOOL OFSALESMANSHIP WOMEN'S EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL UNION. BOSTON, MASS ,WASHINGi 9N GOVERNMENT PRINTING pFF10E 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES Or TIDE TIIIILICATIOS KAT P.1110CDIRD nom 1111SUPIWITZDDINT 01 DOCOMINT3 OOTZINIIINT IMMIX° OM= WASHINGTON, D. C, AT li CENTS PER COPY A CONTENTS. Letter of transmittal. Pees. I. History of the Boston school of salesmanship a II. The course of study 7 Salesmanship 13 III. The course of study ( con tin uod)Textiles, color and design, merchandise. Text Bee Color and design Merchandise 23 26 IV. The course of study (concludet 1ithmetic, hygiene, and physical education, English Arithmetic / 28 es Hygiene and physical education English 30 V. The method of teaching 33 36 VI. "Follow-up" work and personal relationswith pupils VII. The teachers' training class 44 48 VIII. 'Educational work in department stor IX. Salesmanship in the public schools 53 as X. Affiliation with the National Retail DryGoods Association Appendix 67 ILLUSTiZATIONS. Plate 1. A class in the store of L. S. Ayres Co.,Indianapolis 2. Studies in color and clethign 16 3. A, the salesmanship class; B, discriminating taste 16 4. Some of the points emphasized in the textile conise 32 3 A LEHER OFTRANSMITTAL. DEPARTNIEN OF TIIE IxrEnioa. BUREAU OF EDUCATION, Washington, February 7,1917. SIR: An interesting survivalof apprenticeship ing modern methods of instruction, embody- classroom work, is foundin -the vocational schools and classes whichmany industrial and commercial ments now maintain within their establish- walls and at theirown expense for the vocational training oftheir employees.This form of teaching, intended primarily forincrease of efficiency in of work, is based some particular line on correct principles of education,and if well done has general educationalvalue.For both reasons it agement at least until other means deserves encour- of vocational educationare more numerous and better developed thanthey are now. Asa valuable concrete example of this kind of vocational education, Irecommend that. the manuscripttransmitted herewith be of the Bureau of Education. published as a bulletin Respect fully submitted. , 4 P. P. CI.AXTON, C'oniroissioner. The SECRETARYOF THE INTERIOR. BUREAU OF EDUCATION. BULLETIN. 1917, NO. 9 PLATE 1. Woman'sTRATION Educational SALE ATand THE Industrial SCHOOL lJnIon, OF Boron, SALESMANSHIP. Maim: DEPARTMENT-STOREEDUCATION. Chapter I. HISTOFM.OF THE BOSTONSCHOOL OF SALES- MANSHIP. Vocationaltraining, asa part of the great movement for industrial bet e rni en tis now widely recognizedas an advantageous measure for b411 the worker and the industry, but it is notmany years since -suck applied educationwas looked upon with disfavor by employers anti employees alike.This report will notattempt to relate the cir- eumstances which have led toa change of sentiment toward the movement as a whole, bnt will dealspecifically with the development of that phasepf it knownto-day as department-store In 1905 the Women's education. Educational and Industrial Unionof Boston undertook to determine what special training was neededby girls who wished to becomesaleswomen. for its aim the educational, This organization, which has industrial, snd social advanceinentof women, endeavored then,as it does now, to improve the conditions of women workers, to find new opportunities for them,,and to help them to get training (U3.-heir chosen line of work. One bers of the. executive of the mem- comiuittee of the union at thttime was lir,. Lucinda Nrbrintin Prince, whobecame so interested In theunion's . investigation of saleswomen and their needsthat she resolved to devote herself to this important'question. By experience andtemperament Mrs. Princewas well fitted for the work in which she now became engaged.After graduation from-the Framingham Norms' School,she taught with markedsuccess in both public and privateschools.Later she studied at Wellesley, College and in Germany. She had traveled extenaitely,,,hada wide acquaintance among educatorsand philanthropists, andwas deeply interested in all socialmovements. She had beena resident in the first college settlementhouse in Boston, an experience her into close touch which brought with the environment andproblems of many working girls and whichconvinced her thata right start in industry would do much toinsure the future happiness and young workers. usefulness of these I In addition to her instinctive liking for all forms ofconstructive social work, Mrs. Princehad a specialreason for being interested in the department-store probieth.For some time she had beenthe 8 - DEPARTMENT -STORE EDUCATION. leader of a club of 50 working girls who met at the uniontwo evenings a month. Many of the girls held positions in deparfnient stores, and all canplained of the low wages they were receiving,even though, in some cases, they had bean working for several years.They seemed to feel that their length of service entitled them toa salary-advance, whereas it was evident that most of them were probably beingpaid quite as much as they were worth.Mrs. 'Prince was conviced that these girls would never be much better off untilsome onhelped them to 'see the possibilities in their work.At this tirne.there was in most stores no plan for instructinga now girl in the runts and cus- toms of the house by which she was employed.f:Shewas given a sales book and placed behind a counter.If she was so fortunate as to be placed next to a kind-hearted sales girl who remembered her own initiation into the work of selling, she would receive some help; otherwise she must work out her own salvation unaided.Mrs. Prince saw in this situation a problem for which educationwas the natural solution.It seemed 'altogether reasonable that saleswomen, like nurses, teachers, and doctors, would profit by training for their special vocation, and she thereupon began to plana course of stud whichehe believed, by creating a more intelligent interest in the w(trk, would result in greater efficiency and betterwages.The Women's Educational and Industrial Union indorsed the plan.A room and the necessary equipment were provided, and helP andsupport in the development of the work were promised. The next step was an effort to enlist the interest of the merchants. Nearly all were frankly skeptical of thesuccess of the proposed school of salesmanship.For one thing, they thought that salesmanship could not be taught by a person not experienced in selling.Mrs. Prince answered this objection by selling as a "special" aya bargain table for several days, and so completely did she outstrip all of her fellow workers that her ability as a saleswomanwas never again called in question.Another objection was that training would not help the stores with their immediate problem, because girls could never be spared from their work to be educated. The management, moreover, was not prepared to offer such an opportunity to new and untried workers, neither was it disposed to guarantee positions to graduates of a course in salesmanship. It was obvious that the school must start Without-the cooperation of the stores.The first class, which was organized in the fall of 1905, was made up of eight girls, who entered because they could not get positions and who were so young that they could enter the stores only as cash girls and stock girls when the-course was completed. The second class was started in January, 1906, with six somewhat older and more promising girls.The school had still nothing definite to offer its graduates, and the girls were not very hopeful material, at best. 1110.11.1 HISTORY OF THE BOSTON SCHOOL OFSALESMANSHIP. 9 To supplement the school work and makeit, vital, actual selling experience was considerednecessary to the success of the exper- iment, but up to this time the only placeswhere such experience might be gained were the food shop and thehandwork shop of the Women's Educational and Industrial Union.Although this oppor- tunity was greatly appreciated, it didnot furnish satisfactory prepa- ration for the larger business world the girlswere to enter.The atmosphere and demandswere those of the small specialty shop, rather than the department store; thecustomers were, in general, of one type; the sales were either paid or charged: the merchandisewas limited.In addition, because the shopswere small, only a few girls at a time could work in them.It was felt that the schoolcould not attract the right type .of girl until it could giveactual store exper- ience, with wages, during the period oftraining, so that girls who wanted the training could affordto take it.It was also felt that the school should be able to guarantee positionsto its graduates.To this end, the cooperation of the largestores was essential.The first store to volunteer this help was William Filene's SonsCo., which offered to take the class on Mondays ata small wage.This firm also expressed willingness to consider graduates of the schoolfor positions.With this more definite plan, the third classopened in July, 1906, with seven pupils. Now that the aims of the schoolwere better understood, the follow- ing stores became interested in the plan:Jordan Marsh Co., William Filene's Sons Co., Gilchrist Co., ShepardNorwell Co., James A. Houston Co., and R. IT. White Co.The superintendents of these stores were invited to become members ofan advisory committee, which should meetonce a month at dinner with Mrs. Kehew, the president of the Women's Educationaland Industrial Union, and Mrs. Prince, the director of the school.At these meetings problems of effective and practical organizationwere discussed, criticism of the work of the school was solicited, andthe superintendents were urged' to visit the school and suggestways in which its value might be in- creased.These conferences were highly influentialin shaping the policy of the school organization, andto the helpful interest of this committee the project owes much of itssuccess.
Recommended publications
  • Colors for Bathroom Accessories
    DUicau kji oLctnufcirus DEC 6 1937 CS63-38 Colors (for) Bathroom Accessories U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DANIEL C. ROPER, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LYMAN J. BRIGGS, Director COLORS FOR BATHROOM ACCESSORIES COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS63-38 Effective Date for New Production, January I, 1938 A RECORDED STANDARD OF THE INDUSTRY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1S37 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 5 cents U. S. Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards PROMULGATION of COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS63-38 for COLORS FOR BATHROOM ACCESSORIES On April 30, 1937, at the instance of the National Retail Dry Goods Association, a general conference of representative manufacturers, dis- tributors, and users of bathroom accessories adopted seven commercial standard colors for products in this field. The industry has since ac- cepted and approved for promulgation by the United States Depart- ment of Commerce, through the National Bureau of Standards, the standard as shown herein. The standard is effective for new production from January 1, 1938. Promulgation recommended. I. J. Fairchild, Chief, Division of Trade Standards. Promulgated. Lyman J. Briggs, Director, National Bureau of Standards. Promulgation approved. Daniel C. Roper, Secretary of Commerce. II COLORS FOR BATHROOM ACCESSORIES COMMERCIAL STANDARD CS63-38 PURPOSE 1 . Difficulty in securing a satisfactory color match between articles purchased for use in bathrooms, where color harmony is essential to pleasing appearance, has long been a source of inconvenience to pur- chasers. This difficulty is greatest when items made of different materials are produced by different manufacturers. Not only has this inconvenienced purchasers, but it has been a source of trouble and loss to producers and merchants through slow turnover, multiplicity of stock, excessive returns, and obsolescence.
    [Show full text]
  • Department Stores on Sale: an Antitrust Quandary Mark D
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 26 Article 1 Issue 2 Winter 2009 March 2012 Department Stores on Sale: An Antitrust Quandary Mark D. Bauer Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark D. Bauer, Department Stores on Sale: An Antitrust Quandary, 26 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2012). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol26/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bauer: Department Stores on Sale: An Antitrust Quandary DEPARTMENT STORES ON SALE: AN ANTITRUST QUANDARY Mark D. BauerBauer*• INTRODUCTION Department stores occupy a unique role in American society. With memories of trips to see Santa Claus, Christmas window displays, holiday parades or Fourth of July fIreworks,fireworks, department stores­stores- particularly the old downtown stores-are often more likely to courthouse.' engender civic pride than a city hall building or a courthouse. I Department store companies have traditionally been among the strongest contributors to local civic charities, such as museums or symphonies. In many towns, the department store is the primary downtown activity generator and an important focus of urban renewal plans. The closing of a department store is generally considered a devastating blow to a downtown, or even to a suburban shopping mall. Many people feel connected to and vested in their hometown department store.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Bibliography of Commercial Architecture in the United States
    A HISTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTURE IN THE UNITED STATES Compiled by Richard Longstreth, 2002; last revised 7 May 2019 I have focused on historical accounts giving substantive coverage of the commercial building types that traditionally distinguish city and town centers, outlying business districts, and roadside development. These types include financial institutions, hotels and motels, office buildings, restaurants, retail and wholesale facilities, and theaters. Buildings devoted primarily to manufacturing and other forms of production, transportation, and storage are not included. Citations of writings devoted to the work of an architect or firm and to the buildings of a community are limited to a few of the most important relative to this topic. For purposes of convenience, listings are divided into the following categories: Banks; Hotels-Motels; Office Buildings; Restaurants; Taverns, etc.; Retail and Wholesale Buildings; Roadside Buildings, Miscellaneous; Theaters; Architecture and Place; Urbanism; Architects; Materials-Technology; and Miscellaneous. Most accounts are scholarly in nature, but I have included some popular accounts that are particularly rich in the historical material presented. Any additions or corrections are welcome and will be included in updated editions of this bibliography. Please send them to me at [email protected]. B A N K S Andrew, Deborah, "Bank Buildings in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia," in William Cutler, III, and Howard Gillette, eds., The Divided Metropolis: Social and Spatial Dimensions
    [Show full text]
  • General Background
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Earth and Mineral Sciences RESTRUCTURING DEPARTMENT STORE GEOGRAPHIES: THE LEGACIES OF EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION IN PHILADELPHIA’S JOHN WANAMAKER AND STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER, 1860-1960 A Thesis in Geography by Wesley J Stroh © 2008 Wesley J Stroh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2008 The thesis of Wesley J. Stroh was reviewed and approved* by the following: Deryck W. Holdsworth Professor of Geography Thesis Adviser Roger M. Downs Professor of Geography Karl Zimmerer Professor of Geography Head of the Department of Geography *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ABSTRACT RESTRUCTURING DEPARTMENT STORE GEOGRAPHIES: THE LEGACIES OF EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION IN PHILADELPHIA’S JOHN WANAMAKER AND STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER, 1860-1960 Consolidation in the retail sector continues to restructure the department store, and the legacies of earlier forms of the department store laid the foundation for this consolidation. Using John Wanamaker’s and Strawbridge & Clothier, antecedents of Macy’s stores in Philadelphia, I undertake a case study of the development, through expansion and consolidation, which led to a homogenized department store retail market in the Philadelphia region. I employ archival materials, biographies and histories, and annual reports to document and characterize the development and restructuring Philadelphia’s department stores during three distinct phases: early expansions, the first consolidations into national corporations, and expansion through branch stores and into suburban shopping malls. In closing, I characterize the processes and structural legacies which department stores inherited by the latter half of the 20th century, as these legacies are foundational to national-scale retail homogenization.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail History Data
    Retail History Data Taken from Our Video on the History of American Retailing 12 Largest US Metropolitan Areas, 1930 City Metropolitan Area Population, 1930 NY 10,901 Chicago 4,365 Philadelphia 2,847 Los Angeles 2,318 Boston 2,308 Detroit 2,105 Pittsburgh 1,954 St. Louis 1,294 San Francisco 1,290 Cleveland 1,195 Baltimore 949 Minneapolis 832 Estimated Biggest Single US Department Stores, 1963 Store City Sales ($MM) Macy’s NY 168 Field’s Chicago 135 Hudson’s Detroit 110 A&S Brooklyn 100 Jordan Marsh Boston 90 Lazarus Columbus 85 Bloomingdale’s NY 78 Hudson’s Northland, Detroit 75 Dayton’s Minneapolis 72 Rich’s Atlanta 70 Kaufmann’s Pittsburgh 67 Wanamaker’s Philadelphia 67 Famous-Barr St. Louis 65 Carson Pirie Scott Chicago 60 Filene’s Boston 59 Saks 5th Avenue NY 59 Highest Single Store Revenues Adjusted for Inflation to 2010 Dollars Store City Year Sales in 2010 $ (MM) AT Stewart NY 1873 $ 217 Wanamaker Philadelphia 1902 $ 442 Macy’s New York 1906 $ 403 Field’s Chicago 1906 $ 610 Bon Marche Paris 1906 $ 965 Macy’s NY 1930 $ 1286 Hudson’s Detroit 1953 $ 1242 ? Field’s Chicago 1962 $ 969 Hudson’s Northland 1962 $ 538 Japanese Stores Tokyo 1990s-2000s $ 2500-3000 A&P Number of Stores Year Number of Stores 1860 1 1865 4 1870 11 1881 100 1890 150 1901 198 1906 291 1910 372 1912 480 A&P Number of Stores Year Number of Stores 1912 480 1913 585 1914 991 1915 1,817 1916 2,866 1917 3,782 1918 3,799 1919 4,224 1920 4,621 1923 9,303 1925 14,034 1927 15,671 Largest Grocery Chains 1929 Chain Base Stores Sales ($MM) A&P NY 15,418 $1054 Kroger Cinci
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    Case3:15-cv-00612-SC Document1 Filed02/09/15 Page1 of 45 1 AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, NY SBN1084698 2 [email protected] CHESTER ROTHSTEIN, NY SBN2382984 3 [email protected] MARC J. JASON, NY SBN2384832 4 [email protected] JESSICA CAPASSO, NY SBN4766283 5 [email protected] 90 Park Avenue 6 New York, NY 10016 Telephone: (212) 336-8000 7 Facsimile: (212) 336-8001 (Pro Hac Vice Applications Forthcoming) 8 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 9 GARNER K. WENG, SBN191462 [email protected] 10 CHRISTOPHER S. WALTERS, SBN267262 [email protected] 11 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 12 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 MACY'S, INC. and MACYS.COM, INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 MACY'S, INC. and MACYS.COM, INC., Case No. 20 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK 21 INFRINGEMENT, FALSE ADVERTISING, v. FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, 22 DILUTION, AND UNFAIR COMPETITION STRATEGIC MARKS, LLC and ELLIA 23 KASSOFF, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 -1- COMPLAINT Case3:15-cv-00612-SC Document1 Filed02/09/15 Page2 of 45 1 Plaintiffs Macy’s, Inc. and Macys.com, Inc. (collectively and individually “Macy’s” or 2 “Plaintiffs”), by their attorneys, for their complaint against Defendants Strategic Marks, 3 LLC (“Strategic Marks”) and Ellia Kassoff (collectively “Defendants”) allege as follows: 4 INTRODUCTION 5 1. Macy’s is commencing this action on an emergent basis to prevent the 6 expansion of Defendants’ willful, intentional and flagrant misappropriation of Macy’s 7 famous trademarks.
    [Show full text]
  • News Briefs Mayor's Column
    VOL. 113 - NO. 52 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, DECEMBER 25, 2009 $.30 A COPY A Very Merry Christmas THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO LUKE: 2:11-14 to our Readers and Advertisers (Submitted by Bob DeCristoforo) from the staff of the Post-Gazette Pam Donnaruma Claude Marsilia Ben Doherty Hilda Morrill Prof./Cav. Phillip J. DiNovo Freeway Mrs. Murphy Frances Fitzgerald Joan Smith Reinaldo Oliveira, Jr. Mary DiZazzo Bob Morello Ed Campochiaro Shallow Dom BarronRay David Trumbull Lee Porcella Bob SamanthaDeCristoforo Josephine (Photo by Bob DeCristoforo) Ed Turiello Bennett John Christoforo Molinari Yolanda The Birth of Jesus for all the people. Today in the town of David Sal Giarratani In those days Caesar Augustus issued a a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ Lisa Orazio Buttafuoco decree that a census should be taken of the the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will Richard Cappuccio Girard Plante Molinari entire Roman world. (This was the first cen- find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a Richard Preiss sus that took place while Quirinius was gov- manger.” Vita Sinopoli David Saliba Andre Urdi ernor of Syria.) And everyone went to his Suddenly a great company of the heavenly own town to register. host appeared with the angel, praising God So Joseph also went up from the town of and saying, Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem “Glory to God in the highest, :and on earth the town of David, because he belonged to peace to men on whom his favor rests.” the house and line of David.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Rise Developers Discovering Miami's Edgewater Neighborhood Dallas-Based Multifamily Builder Pays $29.6 Million for Two-Acre Waterfront Site
    February 7, 2019 UMV: 1,364,095 High-Rise Developers Discovering Miami's Edgewater Neighborhood Dallas-based Multifamily Builder Pays $29.6 Million for Two-Acre Waterfront Site By: Paul Owers (Corrected Feb. 8 to show the final sales price for the parcel in the second paragraph was $29.6 million, and not $21.9 million as originally reported in public records.) In the 1960s and 1970s, the Edgewater neighborhood along Biscayne Bay in Miami was an area of modest single-family homes and department store icons Sears, Burdines and Jordan Marsh. No more. Now Edgewater is a haven for high-rise developers looking to push north out of the increasingly crowded downtown and Brickell Avenue. The latest example: A Dallas-based apartment owner and developer paid $29.6 million for a two-acre bayfront site. Mill Creek Residential bought the land at 412-436 NE 22nd St. from Unity Center of Practical Christianity. Newmark Knight Frank, the brokerage representing the seller, said current zoning codes offer Mill Creek flexibility to build larger unit sizes. Mill Creek officials did not respond to interview requests made through a publicist. The Edgewater neighborhood stretches from Northeast 17th Street to the south, Northeast 37th Street to the north, the Florida East Coast Railway to the west and Biscayne Bay to the east. After the department stores left for suburban shopping malls, the area fell into disrepair in the 1980s and 1990s, but a resurgence is well under way. "As the downtown expanded out, more areas needed to be brought in," said Alyce Robertson, executive director of the Miami Downtown Development Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Face of East Somerville: from Horse-Drawn Trolleys to Transit Stations
    Evolving Face of East Somerville: From Horse-Drawn Trolleys to Transit Stations Tour researched and led by Ed Gordon, President of the Victorian Society in America, New England Chapter Sunday, June 12th, 2016 Co-Sponsored by the Somerville Historic Preservation Commission and East Somerville Main Streets The tour begins at the East Somerville Branch of the Somerville Library, 115 Broadway. East Somerville, arguably more than any other area of Somerville, has experienced the most radical alterations to its topography. Transportation projects that introduced canal boats, trolleys and commuter trains to the area; a hill reduction that paved the way for residential construction; and land-making to accommodate industrial growth – these factors have all resulted in notable changes to the neighborhood’s landscape and streetscape. The story of transportation innovations in East Somerville goes back nearly 400 years. It begins with Broadway: in the mid-1630s. The road was set out from Charlestown Neck (Sullivan Square), ascended the east slope of Winter Hill and then turned northwest to follow Main Street before proceeding into Medford by way of a bridge over the Mystic River. Paul Revere followed this route to make his legendary horseback ride to Lexington ahead of the British redcoats. During the late 18th century, Broadway was extended over Winter Hill, continuing along its current path all the way to Menotomy (now Arlington). Until as late as the 1840s, Broadway in East Somerville was bordered by a handful of Colonial-era farms. The East Somerville section of the Middlesex Canal was built between 1793 and the early 1800s. The introduction of the Canal had surprisingly little impact on construction in the area beyond a ditch-like depression cut through low-lying land between Broadway and Mystic River wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocn890018402.Pdf (258.8Kb)
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE TAX BOARD MACY’S EAST, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Docket No. F251009 Promulgated: November 5, 2002 This is an appeal filed under the formal procedure pursuant to G.L. c. 62C, § 39 from the refusal of the appellee to abate corporate excise assessed against the appellant under G.L. c. 63, § 38 for the taxable period ended February 1, 1997. Commissioner Scharaffa heard the appeal and was joined in the decision for the appellee by Chairman Burns and Commissioners Gorton, Egan, and Rose. These findings of fact and report are made at the requests of the appellant and the appellee pursuant to G.L. c. 58A, § 13 and 831 CMR 1.32. Paul H. Frankel, Esq., Hollis L. Hyans, Esq., Amy F. Nogid, Esq., Michael A. Pearl, Esq. and Maxwell D. Solet, Esq., for the appellant Thomas Condon, Esq. and Elisabeth DiTomassi, Esq., for the appellee. ATB 2002-522 FINDINGS OF FACT AND REPORT On the basis of testimony and exhibits offered at the hearing of this appeal, the Appellate Tax Board (“Board”) made the following findings of fact. The appellant, Macy’s East, Inc. (“Macy’s East”), is a corporation organized under the laws of Ohio with its headquarters in New York. Macy’s East is engaged in the business of operating retail department stores in Massachusetts. During the taxable period ended February 1, 1997 (“tax year at issue”), Macy’s East operated eleven retail stores in Massachusetts. These stores had previously been operated as Jordan Marsh Stores Corporation (“Jordan Marsh”) retail stores. The appellant was the surviving corporation after a series of corporate reorganizations occurring between 1986 and 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Tnaterial Has Cotne Into the World
    A new tnaterial has cotne into the world By means of this important discovery food is now baked in transparent glass dishes so dura­ ble that the hottest oven will not break them. This glass transmits heat so perfectly that the food bakes faster and more uniformly, holds its flavor better and does not burn. P<>tlte The progress of the baking can be seen right Marmite through the dish. This practically does away with guess-work. The quick baking saves time and fuel. It makes a noticeable differ­ ence in your gas bill where gas is used. Pyrex dishes do not chip, craze nor flake-This elimi­ nates a serious danger. They do not absorb grease nor odors. They are not affected by acids nor alkalis. They Pie F late are tough and stand rough handling, and are easily washed, as food does not stick nor burn on, and every speck is seen at a glance. The use of Pyrex insures a sense of absolute cleanli­ ness and efficiency. Glass Dishes for Baking The only glass that does not break in the oven A large variety of shapes and sizes, ranging in price from the Ramekins at 12~c to the large Casserole at $2. Suitable mountings are now obtainable through dealers. Ask your department, china or hardware store to get these Pyrex Glass Dishes for you-or write to any of the following stores and Two-Quart they will supply you: Cas crole Gimbel Bros., Lewis & Conger, New York; Marshall Field & Co., Chicago; Gimbel Bros., Wright, Tyndale & Van Roden, Philadelphia; Famous & Barr, St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Department Store, Tacoma, Washington Thesis Report
    A DEPARTMENT STORE, TACOMA, WASHINGTON THESIS REPORT FOR DEGREE OF MASTER IN ARCHITECTURE MASSACnUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 9, 1949 DANIEL M. STREISSGUTH" L. B. ANDERSON, HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE 467 Beacon Street Boston 15, Massachusetts September 9, 1949 Dean William W. Wurster School of Architecture and Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts Dear Dean Wurster, This thesis report, a department store in Tacoma, Washington, is respectfully submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Architecture. Sincerely, Daniel M. Streissguth TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD . ... .. .. ... .. .. - DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT STORE . .3 THE CITY OF TACOMA Retail Trade .. .... o.... 12 A Brief History and Geography . 15 THE COMPANY . ... ... ... .. 18 PROGRAM Size of Store .. .. .. .. .. 21 Parking Provisions .... ... 23 Space Subdivision Within the Store . 25 Architectural Character . ..... .. 28 SELECTION OF ThE SITE . 31 THE SOLUTION Preliminaries . ... .... ... .. 35 Final . ... ... ... .. .. 38 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....... .... .. 42 FOREWURD The health and vigor of the U.S. department store is attested to by continuing store plant expansion throughout the nation. In nearly every major center, the situation is the same. For examples: Jordan Marsh Co., Boston, is expending millions on its mammoth new downtown store, and is building two new branches; Macy's, Altman's , Bloomingdale's, and Lord & Taylor's - all have established outposts in New York suburbs; both Rich's and the Davidson-Paxton Co. are enlarging their downtown Atlanta stores, and Davidson's plans satellite stores in Columbus, S. Car., and Augusta, Ga.; Neiman-Marcus Co., Dallas, plans expansion throughout the Southwest, and will build stores in University Park (Dallas), Amarillo, iouston, and Phoenix.
    [Show full text]