DOCSLIB.ORG

In the United States District Court for the District of Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the United States District Court for the District of Maryland Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * SAQIB ALI, * Plaintiff, * v. No. 1:19-CV-00078-CCB * LAWRENCE HOGAN, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * GOVERNOR HOGAN’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS BRIAN E. FROSH Attorney General of Maryland ADAM D. SNYDER Assistant Attorney General Bar No. 25723 200 Saint Paul Place, 20th Floor Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 576-6398 (410) 576-6955 (fax) [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Lawrence Hogan, Governor of Maryland Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page 2 of 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 I. MR. ALI LACKS STANDING TO CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE EXECUTIVE ORDER BECAUSE HE HAS NOT SUFFERED A CONCRETE INJURY THAT CAN BE REDRESSED BY THE RELIEF HE SEEKS.............................................. 2 II. THE GOVERNOR LACKS THE “SPECIAL RELATION” TO ENFORCEMENT OF THE EXECUTIVE ORDER REQUIRED FOR THIS COURT’S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION UNDER EX PARTE YOUNG. .................................................................. 8 III. THE EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT. ................ 10 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 19 ii Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page 3 of 33 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases AFSCME Council 79 v. Scott, 278 F.R.D. 664 (S.D. Fla. 2011) ......................................... 9 Agency for Int’l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc’y Int’l, Inc., 570 U.S. 203 (2013) .................................................................................................... 18 Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc., 486 U.S. 492 (1988) ........................ 11 American Muslims for Palestine v. Arizona State Univ., No. CV-18-00670 -PHX-DWL, 2018 WL 6250474 (D. Ariz. Nov. 29, 2018) ........................................... 6 Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip, No. 4:18-CV-00914 BSM, 2019 WL 580669 (E.D. Ark., Jan. 23, 2019) ........................................................... 8, 11 Ayes v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 473 F.3d 104 (4th Cir. 2006) ................................ 5 Babbitt v. Farm Workers, 442 U.S. 289 (1979) .................................................................. 6 Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) .................................................................................... 7 Board of Ancient Order of Hibernians v. Dinkins, 814 F. Supp. 358 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) ............................................................................... 15 Board of County Commissioners, Wabaunsee County, Kan. v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 (1996) ............................................................................................... 16, 17 Burson v. Freeman, 504 U.S. 191 (1992) .......................................................................... 14 Burt v. Gates, 502 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2007) ....................................................................... 11 Connor B. ex rel. Vigurs v. Patrick, 771 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D. Mass. 2011) ........................ 9 D.G. Restaurant Corp. v. City of Myrtle Beach, 953 F.2d 140 (4th Cir. 1991) ................ 15 Duke Energy Trading & Marketing, L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2001) ....................................................................................... 9 Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Baltimore County, 904 F.3d 330 (4th Cir. 2018) ......................................................................................... 5 Eriline Co. S.A. v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 648 (4th Cir. 2006) ................................................ 17 iii Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page 4 of 33 Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) ........................................................................ passim Harp Advert. Illinois, Inc. v. Village of Chicago Ridge, Ill., 9 F.3d 1290 (7th Cir. 1993) ........................................................................................... 3 Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69 (1984) ............................................................... 16 Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010) ................................................... 6 Image Carrier Corp. v. Beane, 567 F.2d 1197 (2d Cir. 1977) ............................................ 6 Injured Workers’ Ins. Fund v. Orient Exp. Delivery Serv., Inc., 190 Md. App. 438 (2010)............................................................................................... 4 International Longshoremen Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Allied Int’l, Inc., 456 U.S. 212 (1982) ..................................................................................................... 12 Invisible Empire of the KKK v. Thurmont, 700 F. Supp. 281 (D. Md. 1988) ................... 15 Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, Inc., 968 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1992) ......................................................................................... 12 Jordahl v. Brnovich, 336 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (D. Ariz. 2018) ..................................... 7, 8, 11 Koontz v. Watson, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (D. Kan. 2018) ............................................. 7, 11 LeClerc v. Webb, 419 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 2005) .................................................................. 6 Los Angeles Police Dep’t v. United Reporting Pub. Corp., 528 U.S. 32 (1999) .............. 19 Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) .......................................................... 3 Madsen v. Boise State Univ., 976 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1992) .............................................. 7 McClintock v. Eichelberger, 169 F.3d 812 (3d Cir. 1999) ................................................ 16 McCullen v. Coakley, 573 U.S. 464 (2014) ............................................................. 2, 13, 14 Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974) ....................................... 18 Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney Gen. of Com. of Virginia, 940 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1991) ......................................................................................... 10 NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982) .................................. 10, 11, 12 Norwood v. Harrison, 413 U.S. 455 (1973) ...................................................................... 12 iv Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page 5 of 33 Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm’n of Cal., 475 U.S. 1 (1986) ................... 18 Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265 (1986) ............................................................................ 10 Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will County, 391 U.S. 563 (1968) ..................................................................................................... 17 Reeves v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (1980) ................................................................................ 17 Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312 (1991) .................................................................................. 3 Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984) ......................................................... 1, 12, 16 Rumsfeld v. FAIR, 547 U.S. 47 (2006) .................................................................. 11, 12, 18 Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976) ......................................................................... 16 Trinity Outdoor, L.L.C. v. City of Rockville, Maryland, No. CIV. JFM-03-2372, 2004 WL 78054 (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2004) ................................ 4 Trinity Outdoor, L.L.C. v. City of Rockville, MD, 123 F. App’x 101 (4th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................. 4 United States v. O’Brien, 31 U.S. 367 (1968) ................................................................... 15 Virginia v. American Booksellers Ass’n, Inc., 484 U.S. 383 (1988) ................................. 10 Wachtler v. County of Herkimer, 35 F.3d 77 (2d Cir. 1994) ............................................. 17 Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Gilmore, 252 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2001) ............... 8, 9 West Va. Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943) ...................................................... 18 Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993) ...................................................................... 16 Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 7057 (1977) ....................................................................... 18 Wright v. North Carolina, 787 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2015) .................................................... 8 Constitutional Provisions U.S. Const. amend. I ................................................................................................... passim v Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page 6 of 33 Statutes 50 U.S.C. § 4842(a)(1) ...................................................................................................... 13 Md. Code Ann., State Fin. & Proc. § 19-101(a) .................................................................. 1 Md. Code Ann., State Fin. & Proc. § 19-103 ...................................................................... 2 Md. Code Ann., State Fin. & Proc. § 19-107(a) ................................................................ 10 vi Case 1:19-cv-00078-CCB Document 12 Filed 04/08/19 Page
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 157, Pt. 7 June 29, 2011 *Matthew H
    10206 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 157, Pt. 7 June 29, 2011 *Matthew H. Tueller, of Utah, a Career Committee; ($1000), 04/29/05, REFUND—Hatch Children and Spouses: Edward and Mien Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class Election Committee; $1000, 05/17/05, Sandhills Patterson: None; Andrew Patterson: None. of Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador Ex- Political Action Committee; $500, 12/14/05, Parents: Carol and John Woods: None; traordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Chafee for Senate; $1000, 12/22/05, Sandhills Viola and Harry Patterson (deceased): None. United States of America to the State of Ku- Political Action Committee; $500, 03/16/06, Grandparents: All deceased. wait. Charles Boustany Jr. MD for Congress; $500, Brothers and Spouses: John D. Woods, Jr. Nominee: Matthew H. Tueller. 03/16/06, Keep Nick Rahall in Congress Com- and Jean Woods: None. Post: Kuwait. mittee; $1000, 04/27/06, Arab American Leader- *Dereth Britt Glance, of New York, to be a (The following is a list of all members of ship Council; $1000, 09/28/06, Bouchard for U.S. Commissioner on the part of the United my immediate family and their spouses. I Senate; $5000, 10/18/06, Arab American Lead- States on the International Joint Commis- have asked each of these persons to inform ership Council; $1461.84, 10/18/06, Gift Basket sion, United States and Canada. me of the pertinent contributions made by for Sununu Reception; $3000, 03/30/07, *Richard M. Moy, of Montana, to be a Com- them. To the best of my knowledge, the in- Sandhills Political Action Committee; $500, missioner on the part of the United States formation contained in this report is com- 10/05/07, Tom Davis Senate Exploratory Com- on the International Joint Commission, plete and accurate.) mittee; $5000, 10/16/07, DLA PIPER LLP (US) United States and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • News Clips Report
    News Clips Report Date HeadLine Outlet 12/12/2008 Reporter's Notebook: Once upon a time, Santa The Gazette of Polities and Business needed a lobbyist 12/12/2008 Reporter's Notebook: Mom, Morella inspire Cokie The Gazette of Politics and Business to pen book 12/12/2008 Reporter's Notebook Mom, Morella inspire Cokie to Gazette, The pen book 12/12/2008 Reporter's Notebook Once upon a time, Santa Gazette, The needed a lobbyist 12/11/2008 Best Washingtonpost Online 12/11/2008 Montgomery: College-Level Tests Grow Fourfold in Washingtonpost - Online A Decade Non College 12/11/2008 Best Washington Post - Online 12/11/2008 Montgomery College-Level Tests Grow Fourfold in Washington Post - Online A Decade County Is Part of Trend Resha 12/11/2008 WHAT'S HAPPENING Washington Post - Online 12/10/2008 SHE HAD JUST STARTED CLASS'S AT ABC 7 News @ 11pm - WJLA MONTGOMERY COLLEGE. 12/10/2008 Guide steers shoppers to local businesses The Gazette 12/10/2008 Montgomery Hot Tickets The Gazette 12/10/2008 Journalist Cokie Roberts talks about women who The Gazette shaped history 12/10/2008 County players among Elite at college baseball The Gazette of Politics and Business prep academy 12/10/2008 Residents fired up over smoking The Gazette of Politics and Business 12/09/2008 Montgomery native running new college baseball The Gazette prep facility 12/09/2008 Obituaries Washington Post - Online 12/08/2008 JUST FOR KIDS The Frederick News-Post Online 12/08/2008 Swimming and Diving 2008-09 The Gazette 12/08/2008 Farm & Garden CALENDAR The Frederick News-Post Online
    [Show full text]
  • From Macacas to Turban Toppers: the Rise in Xenophobic and Racist Rhetoric in American Political Discourse
    SOUTH ASIAN AMERICANS LEADING TOGETHER FROM MACACAS TO TURBAN TOPPERS: THE RISE IN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST RHETORIC IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE OCTOBER 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PART I COMMENTS AIMED GENERALLY AT SOUTH ASIAN, MUSLIM, SIKH, AND ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITIES 4 PART II COMMENTS AIMED AT SOUTH ASIAN CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE 19 PART III TIPS FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS RESPONDING TO XENOPHOBIC RHETORIC 22 TIMELINE OF KEY POST-SEPTEMBER 11TH DOMESTIC POLICIES AFFECTING 25 SOUTH ASIAN, MUSLIM, SIKH, AND ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITIES ENDNOTES 28 FROM MACACAS TO TURBAN TOPPERS: THE RISE IN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST RHETORIC IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY research about such incidents only after that time, primarily Xenophobia and racism have no place in political and civic because of their unprecedented frequency as part of the discourse. Yet, a pattern of such rhetoric continues to exist in broader backlash against these communities. America’s political environment today. For decades, African Divided into three primary sections, the report touches upon Americans and Latinos have been subjected to racist rhetoric the following themes: (1) documented examples of in the political sphere. More recently, as this report shows, xenophobic rhetoric, aimed generally at South Asian, Muslim, South Asians, Muslims, Sikhs, and Arab Americans have been Sikh, or Arab American communities as a whole; the targets of such rhetoric by public officials and political (2) documented examples of such rhetoric aimed specifically candidates from both sides of the aisle. Even more alarming at South Asian candidates running for elected office; and (3) is the use of xenophobia and racism to stir negative responses tips for community members on how to respond to such against political candidates of South Asian descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S4225
    June 29, 2011 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S4225 Nominee: Matthew H. Tueller. ership Council; $1461.84, 10/18/06, Gift Basket on the International Joint Commission, Post: Kuwait. for Sununu Reception; $3000, 03/30/07, United States and Canada. (The following is a list of all members of Sandhills Political Action Committee; $500, *Ariel Pablos-Mendez, of New York, to be my immediate family and their spouses. I 10/05/07, Tom Davis Senate Exploratory Com- an Assistant Administrator of the United have asked each of these persons to inform mittee; $5000, 10/16/07, DLA PIPER LLP (US) States Agency for International Develop- me of the pertinent contributions made by Political Action Committee; $500, 11/13/07, ment. them. To the best of my knowledge, the in- Shelby for U.S. Senate; $1000, 11/14/07, John *Roberto R. Herencia, of Illinois, to be a formation contained in this report is com- Stephen for Congress; $500, 11/20/07, Com- Member of the Board of Directors of the plete and accurate.) mittee to Elect David Cappiello for Congress; Overseas Private Investment Corporation for Contributions, amount, date and donee: $1000, 11/16/07, Charles Boustany Jr. MD for a term expiring December 17, 2012. 1. Self: none. Congress; $500, 11/19/07, Jay Footlik for Con- Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, for the 2. Spouse: DeNeece Tueller: none. gress; $1000, 12/27/07, Shelby for U.S. Senate; Committee on Foreign Relations I re- 3. Children and Spouses: Marie Amara $500, 02/25/08, Tom Davis for Congress; $2300, Tueller: none; Kyle Newkirk: none; Margaret 02/20/08, John McCain 2008 Inc.; $500, 05/15/08, port favorably the following nomina- Tueller Proffitt: none; Clark Proffitt: none; Ros-Lehtinen for Congress; $1000, 09/23/08, tion list which was printed in the David G.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Roster 2007 3 for Web.Qxp
    Preliminary Roster and List of Committees 2007 Session January 10, 2007 This document was prepared by: Library and Information Services Office of Policy Analysis Department of Legislative Services General Assembly of Maryland January 15, 2007 For additional copies or further information, please contact: Library and Information Services 90 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1991 Baltimore/Annapolis Area: 410-946-5400/5410 Washington Area: 301-970-5400/5410 Other Maryland Areas: 1-800-492-7122, ext. 5400/5410 TTY: 410-946/301-970-5401 TTY users may also use the Maryland Relay Service to contact the General Assembly. E-Mail: [email protected] Maryland General Assembly Web site: http://mlis.state.md.us Department of Legislative Services Web site: http://dls.state.md.us The Department of Legislative Services does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or disability in the admission or access to its programs, services, or activities. The Department's Information Officer has been designated to coordinate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.107 of the Department of Justice Regulations. Requests for assistance should be directed to the Information Officer at the telephone numbers shown above. 3hp 1/07 ii Table of Contents Page Presiding Officers . .1 Senate Leadership . .3 House Leadership . .5 Senate of Maryland . .7 House of Delegates . .15 Senate Standing Committees . .39 House Standing Committees . .41 Please Note: Phone and room numbers listed in this Preliminary Roster may be subject to change. As well, the photographs of members will be updated as new photographs become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Ballot Presidential Primary Election April 3, 2012 State of Maryland, Montgomery County Democratic Ballot
    OFFICIAL BALLOT PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION APRIL 3, 2012 STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC BALLOT PAPELETA ELECTORAL OFICIAL ELECCIÓN PRIMARIA PRESIDENCIAL 3 DE ABRIL DEL 2012 ESTADO DE MARYLAND, CONDADO DE MONTGOMERY PAPELETA DEL PARTIDO DEMÓCRATA INSTRUCTIONS To vote, completely fill in the oval to the left of your choice(s). Mark only with a #2 pencil. DO NOT ERASE. If you make a mistake you may request a new ballot. If your vote for a candidate is marked in such a manner that your intent is not clearly demonstrated, your vote for that office may not be counted. To protect the secrecy of your vote, do not put your name, initials, or any identifying mark on your official ballot. INSTRUCCIONES Para votar, rellene completamente el óvalo a la izquierda de su(s) elección(es). Marque solamente utilizando un lápiz #2. NO BORRE. Si comete un error, podría solicitar una nueva papeleta electoral. Si su voto por un candidato o pregunta está marcado de tal manera que su intención no es claramente demostrable, su voto por ese cargo podría no ser contado. Para proteger el secreto del voto, no escriba su nombre, sus iniciales o cualquier marca distintiva en la papeleta electoral oficial. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT Vote for One JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 6 PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS Vote for No More Than Three Vote por Uno JUEZ DE LA CORTE DE CIRCUITO Barack Obama CIRCUITO JUDICIAL 6 Illinois Vote por No Más de Tres Unopposed / Sin Oponente Anne K. Albright Uncommitted to Any Presidential Unopposed / Sin Oponente Candidate \ Sin Compromiso por ningún Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Courting the South Asian Vote: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
    Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 24 Issue 2 Volume 24, Fall 2009, Issue 2 Article 2 Courting the South Asian Vote: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back Deepa Iyer Priya Murthy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES COURTING THE SOUTH ASIAN VOTE: ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK DEEPA IYER, ESQ. & PRIYA MURTHY, ESQ.* INTRODUCTION The 2008 election was historically significant for a range of reasons: the first African-American President in United States history; the effective use of grassroots and internet-based efforts to mobilize voters; and an unprecedented turnout among youth, minority and new American voters. Post-election analysis has shown that minority and new American voters overwhelmingly supported now-President Barack Hussein Obama in the election. In fact, of the approximately eleven million Latinos who voted,1 * Deepa lyer is Executive Director of South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT), and a civil and immigrant rights advocate for ten years. She previously worked for the Asian Pacific American Legal Resource Center and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Priya Murthy, Policy Director at SAALT, monitors and analyzes policies affecting South Asians. She is a graduate of Tulane University Law School and the University of California at Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • US Commission on Civil Rights Public Briefing “An Assessment of Minority
    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Public Briefing “An Assessment of Minority Voting Rights Access in the United States” Held on Friday, February 2, 2018 in Raleigh, NC Testimony of Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC March 19, 2018 I. Introduction Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC (Advancing Justice – AAJC), along with Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Asian Law Caucus (Advancing Justice – ALC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Atlanta (Advancing Justice – Atlanta), Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Chicago (Advancing Justice – Chicago) and Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Los Angeles (Advancing Justice – LA), submit this testimony for the record for the public briefing “An Assessment of Minority Voting Rights Access in the United States” held on February 2, 2018 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in Raleigh, NC.1 Advancing Justice – AAJC is a part of Asian Americans Advancing Justice (Advancing Justice), a national affiliation of five civil rights nonprofit organizations that joined together in 2013 to promote a fair and equitable society for all by working for civil and human rights and empowering Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other underserved communities. The Advancing Justice affiliation is comprised of our nation’s oldest Asian American legal advocacy center located in San Francisco (Advancing Justice – ALC), our nation’s largest Asian American advocacy service organization located in Los Angeles (Advancing Justice – LA), the largest national Asian American policy advocacy organization located in Washington D.C. (Advancing Justice – AAJC), the leading Midwest Asian American advocacy organization (Advancing Justice – Chicago), and the Atlanta-based Asian American advocacy organization that serves one of the largest and most rapidly growing Asian American communities in the South (Advancing Justice – Atlanta).
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistani Immigrants
    Pakistani Immigrants by Kathleen M. Moore Introduction The experience of Pakistani Americans has been shaped by the convergence of two immigration trends, the first Asian and the second from the Muslim world. The ear- liest arrivals to the United States were Punjabi men in the 1890s, and immigration from the area that now constitutes Pakistan lasted until the U.S. Congress placed severe restrictions on all Asian immigration through the 1917 „barred Asiatic zone‰ law and the 1924 Johnson-Reed immigration act. Though they were mostly Sikhs, they were often classified in official records as Asian Indian or, alternatively, Pun- jabi or Hindu immigrants. Most were from soldiering and farming backgrounds, and many settled in the agricultural sector of California. An estimated 6,000 to 7,000 rural immigrants arrived and settled in the United States between 1890 and 1917. After an interruption of nearly 50 years, Pakistani immigration resumed in the late 1960s, following the adoption of the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act. This second wave witnessed a steady upward trend in the number of Pakistanis admitted into the United States. Most have arrived as family units and typically came with university degrees in hand or under student visas to pursue degrees in the United States. Many are highly skilled and thus are in high demand in the American economy. These immigrants are financially well off, with household incomes well above the median income in the United States. On the other hand, a proportion of immigrants at the close of the 20th century are less-skilled persons who have been admitted through the immigration serviceÊs diversity visa lottery program and other channels.
    [Show full text]
  • November 4 – 5, 2006
    ADECISIONS special publication for Maryland’s Catholic community ’06 November 4 – 5, 2006 Benjamin L. Cardin Michael S. Steele Robert L. Ehrlich Martin J. O’Malley For 20 years now, the Maryland Catholic Conference has used its surveys of political candidates to assist Maryland Catholics in making prudent election choices. This year, candidates for governor, the U.S. Congress, and the state General Assembly received as many as four written Conference invitations to share their views with Maryland Catholics on a wide range of public-policy issues. Conference surveys focused on education and family concerns, respect-for-life issues, and social- justice matters. This special publication for Catholic voters reports the results. Every vote counts! VOTE NOV. 7th! 2 Maryland Decisions ’06 • November 4 – 5, 2006 Candidates for U.S. Senate Speak Ben Cardin promises to listen Michael Steele calls for change; to many voices if elected to Senate ‘a different voice in the room’ BY GEORGE P. MATYSEK JR. BY GEORGE P. MATYSEK JR. [email protected] [email protected] Benjamin L. Cardin was one of a small Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele acknowledges number of congressmen who voted against he is an unusual candidate for the U.S. Sen- the war in Iraq. It wasn’t a popular vote, but ate. it’s a vote Mr. Cardin was proud of then and As a Catholic, African-American Repub- one he’s proud of now. lican who once studied to become an Augus- Should Marylanders elect him to the U.S. tinian priest and who sometimes rejects Senate this November, the longtime Mary- positions of his own party, the Republican land legislator said he would continue to nominee said he doesn’t easily fit stereo- stand by his convictions even when it might types.
    [Show full text]
  • Roster and List of Committees
    MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY Roster and List of Committees 2010 This document was prepared by: Library and Information Services Office of Policy Analysis Department of Legislative Services General Assembly of Maryland March 8, 2010 For additional copies or further information, please contact: Library and Information Services 90 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1991 Baltimore/Annapolis Area: 410-946-5400/5410 Washington Area: 301-970-5400/5410 Other Maryland Areas: 1-800-492-7122, ext. 5400/5410 TTY: 410-946/301-970-5401 TTY users may also use the Maryland Relay Service to contact the General Assembly. E-Mail: [email protected] Maryland General Assembly Web site: http://mlis.state.md.us Department of Legislative Services Web site: http://dls.state.md.us The Department of Legislative Services does not discriminate on the basis of age, ancestry, color, creed, marital status, national origin, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability in the admission or access to its programs, services, or activities. The Department's Information Officer has been designated to coordinate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.107 of the Department of Justice Regulations. Requests for assistance should be directed to the Information Officer at the telephone numbers shown above. ii Contents Page Senate of Maryland Senate Biographies .............................................................................................................. 1 House of Delegates of Maryland House Biographies ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theorizing the Racial Ambiguity of South Asian Americans
    nys69-1_cv_nys69-1_cv 10/15/2014 7:32 AM Page 7 Reprinted from the New York University Annual Survey of American Law DESICRIT: THEORIZING THE RACIAL AMBIGUITY OF SOUTH ASIAN AMERICANS Vinay Harpalani Volume 69 Issue 1 2013 35559-nys_69-1 Sheet No. 45 Side A 10/20/2014 11:50:05 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYS\69-1\NYS108.txt unknown Seq: 1 15-OCT-14 10:41 DESICRIT: THEORIZING THE RACIAL AMBIGUITY OF SOUTH ASIAN AMERICANS VINAY HARPALANI* ABSTRACT This Article analyzes the racial ambiguity of South Asian Amer- icans—peoples whose ancestry derives from the Indian subconti- nent—and has two major aims. First, it provides a comprehensive account of the racialization of South Asian Americans (Desi) a group that legal scholars have not considered at any length in the * Associate Professor of Law, Savannah Law School. J.D. 2009, N.Y.U. School of Law; Ph.D. 2005, University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, I presented this Article at the Yale Law School Critical Race Theory Conference, the Advanced Critical Race Theory Workshop at UCLA School of Law, and the Conference of Asian Pacific American Law Faculty. Much earlier versions were presented at the Latina and Latino Critical Legal Theory, Inc. (LatCrit) XIII conference, the annual meetings of the Law and Society Association and the American Sociological Association, the “Can ‘People of Color’ Become a United Coalition” Symposium at N.Y.U. School of Law, “Global and Local Dimensions of Asian America: An International Conference on Asian Diasporas” at the University of California, Berkeley, and the Asian American Studies Colloquium and the Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Development Proseminar at the University of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]