PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FORGE ROAD, CHINLEY, DERBYSHIRE FOR WAINHOMES (NORTH WEST) LTD
AUGUST 2017
GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
17134/GEIR
Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd
DOCUMENT STATUS
Site Reference Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Title Geo-Environmental Investigation Report Client Wainhomes NW Ltd Project No. 17134/GEIR Report Version Final Issue Date Issued 24th August 2017 Issue Notes Issued for comment and approval
Report Version Date Issued Issue Notes
Report Version Date Issued Issue Notes
Report Version Date Issued Issue Notes
Report Version Date Issued Issue Notes
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 6.0 CONTAMINATION ANALYSIS & 1.1 Instructions ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.2 Object 6.1 Sampling 1.3 Scope 6.2 Range 1.4 Development Proposals 6.3 Laboratory 1.5 Services 6.4 Development Proposals 6.5 Analysis Range 2.0 THE SITE 6.6 Results 2.1 Location 6.7 Approach 2.2 Boundaries 6.8 Site Classification 2.3 Access 6.9 Criteria 2.4 Topography 2.5 Site Conditions 7.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS & 2.6 Trees QUALITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT 2.7 Walkover Survey 7.1 Model 7.2 Results Summary 3.0 DESK STUDY 7.3 Metals & Inorganics 3.1 Historical Industrial Sites 7.4 Speciated PAH 3.2 Environmental Permits, Incidents & Registers 7.5 TPH (CWG) 3.3 Landfill Sites 7.6 BTEX 3.4 Current Land Uses 7.7 Sulphates 3.5 Hydrogeology & Hydrology 7.8 Ground Gases 3.6 Flooding 3.7 Environmentally Sensitive Areas 8.0 DISCUSSIONS 3.8 Geology 8.1 General 3.9 Ground Workings 8.2 Revised Conceptual Site Model 3.10 Background Soil Chemistry 8.3 Preliminary Remediation Proposals 3.11 Site History 8.4 Foundations 3.12 Anticipated Ground Conditions 8.5 Ground Floor Construction 3.13 Preliminary Conceptual Model 8.6 Flooding
4.0 SITE WORKS 9.0 CONCLUSIONS & 4.1 Intrusive Works RECOMMENDATIONS 4.2 Locations 9.1 Remediation 4.3 Records 9.2 Foundations 4.4 Targeting 9.3 Ground Floor Construction 9.4 Groundwater 5.0 GROUND CONDITIONS 9.5 SUDS 5.1 Topsoil 9.6 Further Work 5.2 Made Ground 5.3 Natural Strata 10.0 NOTES 5.4 Bedrock 5.5 Groundwater 5.6 Excavations 5.7 Contamination 5.8 Sampling 5.9 Index Testing 5.10 Ground Gases 5.11 SUDS
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd
LIST OF TABLES
Executive Summary Table 1 Review of Historical Maps Table 2 Anticipated Ground Conditions Table 3 Potential Ground Related Issues Table 4 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model Table 5 Initial Ground Investigation Strategy Table 6 Table of Chemical Testing Table 7 Summary of Contamination Analysis: Metals & Inorganics: Table 8 Summary of Contamination Analysis: Organics: Organics: PAH USEPA 16 Suite Table 9 Summary of Contamination Analysis: Organics: TPH (CWG) Suite Table 10 Summary of Contamination Analysis: Organics: BTEX Suite Table 11 Revised Conceptual Site Model
LIST OF DRAWINGS
17134/01 Trial Pit Location Plan 17134/02 Trial Pit Location Plan (with sketch layout) 17134/03 Development Constraints Plan 1307WHD/Extra/SK01 Proposed Site Layout Plan
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Groundsure Enviro-Insight Report Appendix B Groundsure Geo-Insight Report Appendix C Ordnance Survey Maps Appendix D Trial Pit Location Plan Appendix E Trial Pit Journals Appendix F Trial Pit Location Plan (with sketch layout) Appendix G Development Constraints Plan Appendix H Proposed Site Layout Plan Appendix I Coal Authority Report Appendix J Exova Jones Laboratory Test Results Appendix K Professional Soils Laboratory Test Results
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The site is irregular in shape and extends to an area of approximately Site 1.4 hectares. The site is located upon the southern side of Forge Road at the southern edge of Chinley Village NGR SJ 41855 93221 The site has a full recorded history of open rural and agricultural use with no development or issues. The land immediately to the west has Site History been occupied by a form mill which has now been demolished and remediated. This site is currently in the process of being developed by our clients. The investigations have extended to:- Walkover survey Investigations Desk study Extensive intrusive investigations by trail pitting techniques. Geotechnical & chemical analyses of soil samples Topsoil approximately 0.2m thick is present over almost the whole site (except at the south eastern corner). The very shallow superficial deposits comprise of glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits comprising of Ground Conditions soft / frim clays with sands and gravels bands and lenses typically extending to depths in the order of 1.5 – 2.0m below ground level. The site appears to be underlain by Glacial Till deposits as a basal superficial deposit Very significant water entries have been recorded at varying depths in almost all trial pits. The excavations have suffered “running sand” type conditions and severe instability. The ground water does appear to Groundwater exhibit a hydraulic gradient across the site in line with the topography. Ground water is expected to represent a very significant issue at this site. No evidence of any potentially hazardous contamination of the ground has been identified during these works. No on-site or off-site sources of Environmental potential ground gas emission have been identified and the site is classified as CS1 (Green) The site contains a series of mature and semi mature trees which may influence the development. A detailed arboraculturists report is strongly Trees recommended before any further works take place. Foundation precautions in accordance with NHBC Handbook chapter 4.2 are likely to be required. The shallow strata offers the potential to adopt traditional strip foundations BUT it is likely that all excavations will be impacted by heavy water ingress and this may limit the economic viability of a shallow spread footing solution. In the absence of a formal ground Foundations water management strategy the following foundations type are available: Raft foundation VSC (bottom fed system) subject to contactor agreement Piles and ground beams It is recommended that suspended ground floor construction be adopted for all properties located within this site. These floors may be of a pre cast concrete beam and block arrangement or of a suitably
designed cast insitu reinforced concrete. In those areas where tree root Slabs effects are important it is recommended that a pre cast concrete beam and block type floor is utilised to allow for the provision of a suitable air void below the ground floor construction. It is considered that the site is not capable of adopting a soakaways SUDS system of surface water disposal and will need to connect to existing drainage sewers. There are no requirements for any formal remediation works to facilitate Remediation the residential development of this suite.
This brief summary should not be assumed to represent a complete account of all the potential geo-environmental issues that may exist at the site. As such it is strongly recommended that the report be read in its entirety.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION WORKS
FORGE ROAD, CHINLEY, DERBYSHIRE.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Instructions
1.1.1 We are instructed by Wainhomes (NW) Ltd., Kelburn Court, Daten Park, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 6UT to undertake a program of ground investigation works at a site situated off Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire which they intend to develop in a residential manner.
1.2 Object
1.2.1 The object of these investigations are as follows:
To determine the engineering properties of the soils present within the site to form a basis upon which foundation and general infrastructure recommendations and design may be based; To enable sufficient information regarding ground conditions to be obtained from which risks to end users and the environment can be assessed; To utilise the information obtained from the investigations to provide recommendations for remediation measures where required.
1.3 Scope
1.3.1 The investigations considered within this report have comprised of the following elements:
An initial environmental and engineering desk study based upon existing reports, services location information, geological, hydrogeology and hydrological information, a commercially available database and old Ordnance Survey maps; An initial walkover survey of the site has been undertaken prior to any intrusive investigations being commenced to determine the presence of any visible hazards or features which may affect the design of the ground investigation works; Undertake ground investigation works by trial pit excavation techniques; Determine the presence, nature and extent of any soil and groundwater contamination at the site; Determination of the engineering properties of the soils present within the site to form a basis upon which recommendations for foundations and infrastructure construction may be based; Identify the potential requirements for any remedial action, where required.
1.4 Development Proposals
1.4.1 We understand that it is our client’s intention that the site will be developed in a residential manner and an initial development proposal has been provided. A copy of the proposed site layout is appended to this report for general reference. It is however acknowledged that amendments may be made to these proposals as a result of planning consultations and commercial considerations.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd It is however anticipated that the development will be carried out generally in accordance with the principles of the current layout.
1.4.2 At the present time the proposed site layout shows the site be developed by the construction of 13 no. residential properties in detached configurations. All residential properties within the site are to be provided with appropriate private garden areas, associated soft landscaping and road access. The site also includes substantial areas of public open space in the northern part. The site layout plan is appended to this report for reference, (drawing reference 1307WHD/Extra/SK01).
1.5 Services
1.5.1 Information regarding the possible presence of live public services within the site area has been provided by our client. These records indicate that an electricity service and gas service pass through the northern edge of the site adjacent to Forge Road. It is important that these services be identified and protected during any subsequent development works.
1.5.2 Although the remainder of the site is shown to be free of any potential services, each trial pit position has been preceded by a survey utilising a cable avoidance tool (CAT) and careful supervision of each excavation.
2.0 THE SITE
2.1 Location
2.1.1 The site is irregular in shape and extends to an area of approximately 1.4 hectares. The site is located to the south of Forge Road at the southern edge of Chinley village. The centre of the site is located at approximate National Grid Reference SK 04133 82130.
Figure 1 Site Location
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 2.2 Boundaries
2.2.1 The northern boundary to the proposed development is formed by the existing route of Forge Road. To the east the site is bounded by a modern crèche development to the north and by a very modern residential development undertaken by our clients to the south section. The southern boundary of the site is formed by a former mineral tram line which is now retained as a linear parkway and public open land. To the west the site is bounded by an existing scout hut facility and mature residential development.
2.3 Access
2.3.1 The site is currently accessed directly from Forge Road at the northern boundary. The proposed layout shows that formal vehicular access is to be formed from this boundary with a highway arrangement which will be constructed in agreement with the requirements of the appropriate regulatory authorities.
2.4 Topography
2.4.1 The site has an undulating topography but generally rises from north to south with the mineral railway line lying at a higher level than the site. It is likely that the topography of the site will impact upon the development proposals and may require the provision of retaining walls and other features to facilitate the proposed development.
2.5 Site Conditions
2.5.1 At the time of the site walkover and ground investigation the site was in a vacant and overgrown condition with vegetation extending to heights in excess of 1.5m. At the south western boundary area of the site, evidence of builders rubble and construction debris was visible at the surface and this has emanated from the adjoining residential development which is currently progressing.
2.6 Trees
2.6.1 The site contains extensive areas of mature trees and hedges, though from our examination majority of these appear to be Hawthorn. It is strongly recommended that trees within the site and those lying outside the site but within potentially influencing distance of the development should be subject to a detailed arboriculturist report prior to any further development works being undertaken.
2.7 Walkover Survey 2.7.1 Prior to commencing the ground investigation works we have undertaken an initial walkover survey of the site to identify any visible features which may impact upon the proposed redevelopment works and which may require specific attention in terms of ground investigation approach.
2.7.2 The site walkover was conducted on the 26th June 2017 when the weather conditions were dry and sunny. The walkover confirmed that the site was heavily overgrown with surface debris from the adjoining development being visible adjacent to the south western boundary. In localised areas wet surface ground conditions were identified and surface running water was evident in a number of locations.
2.7.3 The walkover survey appraisal has confirmed the undulating topography of the site. However, it is anticipated that the topography of the site may impact upon the development proposals and we anticipate that there will be a requirement for retaining structures to be adopted within the development to regulate the existing levels.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 3.0 DESK STUDY
3.0.1 As part of our environmental desk studies we have commissioned an Enviro-Insight report by Groundsure which gives details of all recorded environmental features relating to the site and its immediately surrounding area. We have also obtained copies of all available old Ordnance Survey maps for the area and these give some historical guidance regarding the former usage of the site area and its immediate vicinity. A Geo-Insight report has also been commissioned which assesses the geological structures within the general area of the site. It should be noted that the area of desk study extends to a greater area than the proposed development site.
3.1 Historical Industrial Sites
3.1.1 The Enviro-Insight report has identified up to twenty five (25 No.) records of sites with potentially contaminative past uses within 250m of the study site boundary. These records predominately relate to the former presence of Forge Mill which occupied the site immediately to the east. This site has however now been fully remediated and is in the process of residential development. The remainder of the references relate to the main highway trunk road located 200m to the south of the site and this clearly will not have any impact upon the proposed development.
3.2 Environmental Permits, Incidents & Registers
3.2.1 The environmental report has identified four (4 No.) records of licensed discharge consents located 127m to the north east of the site. In fact these consents relate to a single operation in relation to the former mill building which has now been removed.
3.2.2 The report has identified a single record of a Part A (2) and Part B activities within the vicinity and this also relates to the former mill usage of the adjoining site.
3.2.3 There are records of five (5 No.) licensed discharge consents within 500m of the study site and here again these relate to the former usage of the adjoining land which has now been fully remediated.
3.2.4 There are no sites determined as contaminated land under Part 2 (A) EPA1990 within 500m of the study site area.
3.3 Landfill Sites
3.3.1 The environmental report has not identified any historical or current landfill sites located within 250m of the study site boundary. The site is therefore not considered to be at risk from migrating explosive or toxic gases from off-site landfill sources.
3.4 Current Land Uses
3.4.1 The Enviro-Insight report has identified five (5 No.) records of potentially contaminative industrial sites, though these are all situated in excess of 100m from the site boundary. Predominately these features relate to electrical substation and pylons, though a commercial business does appear to be operated from a residential property within Chinley. These industrial sites are not considered to pose any potential sources of contamination to this development.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 3.4.2 There are no petrol fuel sites located within 500m of the study site boundary.
3.4.3 The environmental report has not identified any National Grid underground electrical cables or high pressure gas mains within 500m of the study site.
3.5 Hydrogeology & Hydrology
3.5.1 The superficial deposits within the vicinity of the site are designated as Secondary (undifferentiated). This designation is assigned when it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a soil type. In general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and none aquifer in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the soil type.
3.5.2 The site is located above Secondary (A) aquifer rocks which comprise of permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale in some cases form an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formally classified as minor aquifers.
3.5.3 The environmental report has not identified any groundwater, surface water or potable water abstraction licences within 350m of the site boundary and therefore this development does not pose a hazard to any abstraction licences. Although records do exist beyond this distance.
3.5.4 The environmental report provides Environment Agency information on groundwater vulnerability and the soil leaching potential. Information is provided for the site which is classified as minor aquifer with low to high leaching potential. The soil vulnerability is categorised as varying between L to H3.
3.5.5 The environmental report has identified the presence of a series of river network entries within 500m of the study site. Predominately these references relate to Black Brook which is listed as a primary river and is situated immediately to the north of Forge Road. It is clearly possible that this river may be impacted by development works carried out upon this site and it is therefore essential that appropriate precautions be adopted during the development process to ensure that this primary river is not negatively impacted by any development works.
3.6 Flooding
3.6.1 The environmental report has identified that portions of the northern section of the site may be subject to Zone 2 and Zone 3 flooding effects during severe weather conditions. It is recommended that consultations be held with the Environment Agency regarding data available for these flooding effects and their potential impact upon the residential development of the site. It is currently noted that a significant area of the proposed development is indicated to remain as public open space and these areas approximately correlate with the anticipated Zone 2 and Zone 3 flood plains.
3.6.2 The environmental report has indicated that the site is within 50m of a British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility area that relates to superficial deposits flooding with potential of surface. Where potential for groundwater flooding to occur at surface is indicated this means that given the geological conditions in the area groundwater flooding hazard should be considered in all land use planning decisions. It is recommended that other relevant information e.g. records of previous incidents of groundwater flooding, rain fall, property type and land drainage information be investigated in order to establish relative but not absolute risk of groundwater flooding. High confidence has been to this flooding susceptibility.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 3.7 Environmentally Sensitive Areas
3.7.1 The Enviro-Insight report has confirmed a local nature reserve referred to as Stubbins Park lying some 569m to the north west of the site along with the National Park boundary which is situated some 516m to the north of the site. These environmentally sensitive areas would not be anticipated to be detrimentally impacted in any way by the residential development of this site.
3.8 Geology
3.8.1 The geological report confirms that the superficial geology underlying the site is likely to comprise of a combination of alluvium and glacial till. The alluvium deposits are anticipated to be associated with the current and former route of Black Brook as it passes through the site area. These materials are likely to comprise of a combination of soft clays, silts, sands and gravels which are poorly sorted and deposited by river action. To the north and south of the site glacial till is indicated to be present and this comprises of firm to stiff boulder clays with occasional sand and gravel bands and lenses. It is possible that glacial till may underlie the surface alluvial deposits.
3.8.2 The solid geology underlying the site is likely to comprise of the Carboniferous Millstone Grit Group which comprises of alternating sequences of mudstones, siltstones and coarse grained sandstones.
3.8.3 Geological faulting is indicated to lie within the proximity of the site and an inferred fault location extends to the western boundary of the site area. It is considered possible the unrecorded location of continued faulting within the area cannot be discounted and appropriate foundation precautions are likely to be required.
3.8.4 The geological report confirms that the site is not located within a radon affected area as less than 1% of properties are above the action level. In accordance with the Building Research Publication BR211 no radon protective measures are necessary within proposed structures located upon this site.
3.8.5 The geological report confirms that coal mining activity may have taken place within 1000m of the study site boundary. Accordingly a recommendation has been made to obtain a Coal Authority report in relation to the site area. The Coal Authority report is appended to this report for reference and confirms that the site does not lie within an area where any recorded coal mining activity has taken place and unrecorded workings are not considered to be an issue. Accordingly no further precautions or investigations are required in relation to potential coal mining activities.
3.8.6 References are made to the potential presence of mineral veins being present within the site area and its immediately adjoining vicinity. It is however concluded that non-coal mining activities are also considered to represent a highly unlikely possibility and further investigations and precautions are not considered to be necessary.
3.9 Ground Workings
3.9.1 The Geo-Insight report has confirmed the presence of a series of areas where ground workings appear to have taken place. These relate predominately to the former mill lodge structure located to the east of the site along with the highway cutting which is situated to the south. Further reference is made to a small reservoir to the north of the site. These elements are not anticipated to have any impact upon the development and no special precautions are required.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 3.10 Background Soil Chemistry
3.10.1 The initial desk study information presented by Groundsure now includes an estimation of the natural soil chemistry within 250m of the study site boundary. The estimated geometric means of soil concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead and nickel are all anticipated to lie below the current soil guideline values.
3.11 Site History
3.11.1 Table 1 – Review of Historical Maps
Date Site Adjacent Land The site does not appear to contain any The mineral railway adjacent to the southern industrial or commercial features but is boundary of the site is shown to be present at 1880 divided by a series of individual field this time. There are no other important features boundaries. noted at this time. Reference is now made to Forge Mill lying some 1898 No significant changes. 250m to the east of the development area. Forge Mill has been further developed by the construction of a large mill structure. Residential Individual field boundaries have now been 1921 development has taken place adjacent to the removed and are no longer shown. western boundary of the site. The railway to the south is now named as Peak Forest Tramway. Further residential development has taken place 1938 No significant changes. to the north of the site. Increased residential development has taken place to the north and south west of the site and 1971 No significant changes. a sports ground area has been constructed to the north west. 1983 No significant changes. Substantial increase in Forge Mill building. Further development appears to have taken place at Forge Mill with an increased building 1989 No significant changes. footprint and the construction of a car parking area. 1995 No significant changes. No significant changes. Further extensions to the Forge Mill building 2002 No significant changes. structures extending to and slightly beyond the edge of the current site boundary. No evidence of the former mill buildings is now 2014 Current condition. indicated.
3.11.2 Careful appraisal of all available historical information has confirmed that there are no on-site historical features which may impact upon the environment and the site area is indicated to be in a greenfield condition. Clearly substantial commercial and industrial development has taken place within the area of land immediately to the east of the site but this has now been fully remediated and is in the process of extensive residential development.
3.12 Anticipated Ground Conditions
3.12.1 Based upon the information obtained during the initial desk study phase, the anticipated ground conditions are expected to comprise of strata as detailed in table 2 overleaf.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd Table 2 - Anticipated Ground Conditions
Ground Material Anticipated Condition
Topsoil Present over the whole site area. Alluvial deposits present within the northern and eastern areas of the site. Alluvium Comprising of poorly sorted sands, gravels, silts and clays. Glacial till is anticipated to be present over the whole site underlying the Glacial Till alluvium but at surface to the south and west. Comprising of sandy clays with bands and lenses of silts, sands and gravels.
The solid geology underlying the site is likely to comprise of the Millstone Grit Bedrock Group with medium / coarse grained sandstones, siltstones and shales.
Secondary (A) aquifer alluvium and bedrock indicated. Isolated standing ground water anticipated to be present perched on underlying impermeable Ground Water Till material. The site may exhibit a hydraulic gradient down slope within the ground water.
3.12.2 Based upon the data available within the desk study and tables 1 and 2 above, potential ground related issues associated with the proposed redevelopment of this site are likely to include the elements noted in table 3 below.
Table 3 – Potential Ground Related Issues
Type of Remarks Site Specific issue Issue (refer to walk over survey plan)
Potential on Site Contamination 1. Remediation of adjoining site 1. South eastern corner Sources
Potential off Site Contamination 1. None identified Sources 1. Soft / loose ground 1. Potential soft or loose made ground Potential 2. Deep made ground deposits 2. May be present in south eastern corner Geotechnical 3. Trees 3. Marked on plan Hazards 4. Slopes 4. Marked on plan
3.13 Preliminary Conceptual Model
3.13.1 The information presented within this Desk Study section of this report has been used to compile a preliminary conceptual model for the site. The identified potential contaminant and receptors have been considered along with any possible pathways that may link them. The resulting pollution linkages are considered in table 4 overleaf. The risk classification has been estimated in accordance with the terms and definitions based upon CIRIA C552 Contaminated Land Risk Assessment, A Guide to Good Practice.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd Table 4 – Preliminary Conceptual Site Model
Potential Potential Mitigation / Possible Pathway Probability Consequence Risk Source Receptor Investigation
Direct contact of soils Site personnel Inhalation or ingestion Li Md Low during construction of soil / dust Direct contact of soils Future site users Inhalation or ingestion Li Sv Low of soil / dust Surface water in Leaching of Soil sampling the vicinity of the contaminants through Lw Mi Low during intrusive Contaminated site drainage system investigations. Soils Leaching of Ground water in Laboratory contaminants to ground Lw Md Low aquifer analysis of water samples Vapour migration from Future site users Lw Mi Low soils Proposed buildings Direct contact with Li Mi Low and services contaminated soils Plants in gardens and soft Direct contact Lw Mr Very Low landscaping Site personnel Water entering No source of Contaminated Li Md Low during construction excavations contamination to ground water Future site Users Retained surface water Lw Mi Low ground water Toxic and Proposed buildings Ground gas migration No identified Lw Md Low explosive gasses and occupiers into buildings sources Key: Probability: Sv = Severe, Md = Medium, Mi = Mild, Mr = Minor Consequence:Hi = High, Li = Likely, Lw = Low Likelihood, Ul = Unlikely
4.0 SITE WORKS
4.1 Intrusive Works
4.1.1 The ground conditions at this site have been investigated by a series of trial pit excavations. A total of twelve (12 No.) trial holes have been excavated within the site by a JCB type back acting excavator in the presence of an experienced engineer. The locations of these trial pits have been positioned to areas where access could be gained by this type of machine and to where development is intended to take place.
4.1.2 Difficulties of access to some areas of the site due to “boggy” surface conditions and the topography has been prevented. Representative samples of the strata encountered during these investigation works have been retained for laboratory analysis and testing where considered to be appropriate.
4.2 Locations
4.2.1 The locations of the trial pits were chosen by ourselves in conjunction with the desk study information and the proposed site layout. Investigations have been targeted towards the development areas to identify the geotechnical conditions to assist in foundation design and to determine any potential environmental hazards which may impact upon sensitive private gardens.
4.2.2 The locations of each of the trial pits are indicated upon the appended trial pit location plan 17134/01. These locations are shown in relation to the existing site features.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 4.3 Records
4.3.1 During the investigations records of the strata types, water entries, ground conditions and levels within each trial pit have been maintained. This information has been collated into a series of trial pit journals which are appended to this report for reference. Representative samples of the strata encountered have been retained for laboratory testing as required and where appropriate.
4.4 Targeting
4.4.1 The trial pit excavations have been undertaken to identify the shallow superficial strata present over the area of the proposed development. It is acknowledged that ground conditions may vary between individual investigation locations due to the complexity of the lithology of this superficial strata.
4.4.2 The desk study information and site walkover has not identified the presence of any significant historical or current features which may impact upon the proposed redevelopment and accordingly specific targeting of investigations has not been undertaken.
4.4.3 The investigation locations have been spread over the whole area of the site in accordance with the recommendations laid down in BS10175: 2011 “Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites”. The initial ground investigation strategy is detailed within table 5 below.
Table 5 - Initial Ground Investigation Strategy
Exploratory Hole No. Target Purpose
To determine the general nature of underlying soils and geology including:
1. Nature, distribution and thickness of made ground. Generally over the whole TP01 – TP12 2. Nature, degree and extent of potential site. contamination.
3. Content of unacceptable material e.g. peat and biodegradable matter etc. 4. Suitability of the ground for the founding of structures. 5. Engineering properties of the ground.
5.0 GROUND CONDITIONS
5.1 Topsoil
5.1.1 Topsoil has been located over the majority of the site area. The trial pits situated within the south eastern corner of the site (TP 5 and TP 6) have not located any surface topsoil but we anticipate that this has been removed as part of the remediation works which have been undertaken in relation to the immediately adjacent residential development. Generally the topsoil varies in thickness between 0.1m – 0.3m but typically a thickness of some 0.2m or so is present across the site area.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 5.2 Made Ground
5.2.1 Made ground has only been identified within TP 6 which lies immediately adjacent to the south eastern site boundary and which has been impacted by the remedial works to the adjoining site. The made ground extends to a depth of some 1.0m below ground level and comprises of brick, concrete and sandstone fragments within a brown silty clay matrix material. Reference to the remediation program of the adjoining site confirms that these materials are entirely, as anticipated, as a result of these works.
5.3 Natural Strata
5.3.1 The initial desk study information has suggested that the site is likely to be underlain by glacial till materials, though within the northern portions of the site it is likely that significant alluvial deposits are likely to be present overlying the till. These investigations have in fact demonstrated that majority of the site area appears to be covered with a possible combination of glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits which comprise of a complicated sequence of soft to firm sandy clays and clayey sands and gravels. The various layers do not appear to demonstrate lateral conformity and whilst the materials are similar in each trial pit, it is clear that the lithology is highly variable.
5.3.2 Hand vane tests carried out upon samples of cohesive strata obtained from the trial pitting work has confirmed shear strength values in the range of 31 – 78kN/m2. Statistical assessment of these results suggests that the mean shear strength is likely to be in the order of some 50kN/m2 and this suggests that generally this upper strata is capable of offering a safe bearing capacity in excess of 100kN/m2. It is however important to note that localised softer strata has been identified and in these instances increased foundation widths or depths may be required. It is also important to recognise that the bearing capacity of these glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits may be significantly impacted by groundwater, particularly in relation to any deeper excavations.
5.3.3 Underlying the upper glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits the investigations have proved the presence of glacial till material as anticipated. Typically the glacial till lies at a depth of approximately 1.8m below ground level, though till was not encountered in TP 5 – TP 8 and TP 10. In these localities it is anticipated that the glacial till lies at depths beyond the base of these individual trial pits.
5.3.4 Insitu testing of these glacial till materials has confirmed a mean shear strength in the order of 105kN/m2 and this suggests that the glacial till material is capable of offering a safe bearing capacity in excess of 250kN/m2. Whilst this material certainly offers a satisfactory foundation strata to traditional residential development, it is important to recognise that it lies at a significant depth below ground level and its adoption as a bearing strata may be impacted by other factors such as groundwater and stability of excavations.
5.4 Bedrock
5.4.1 Bedrock has not been anticipated to lie at a particularly shallow depth within this site. However, TP 6 appears to have encountered weathered mudstone lying at a depth of approximately 1.4m below existing ground level. Whilst we cannot rule out the possibility that this feature may represent a boulder or other similar anomaly, it should be noted that no other trial pits have encountered bedrock even though they have extended to significantly increased depths.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 5.5 Groundwater
5.5.1 The trial pits undertaken within this area have identified the presence of significant water entries at various depths. The original walkover survey of the site also noted the presence of water at the surface, some of which was seen to be flowing. It would appear therefore that the upper glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits contain significant volumes of water which we anticipate extend from the area to the south of the site which lies at a greater topographical level. The water levels encountered within the trial pits do not represent a consistent groundwater table level and, as anticipated, appear to be predominately associated with the mainly non-cohesive sands and gravels deposits.
5.5.2 It is anticipated that groundwater will represent a significant hazard to all excavations made upon this site and groundwater management will represent a significant issue which should be addressed at a preliminary stage. On the basis that the basal glacial till material lies at relatively shallow depth, it may be possible to create a cut off drain type arrangement at the southern boundary of the site and this may reduce water levels within the development area. Alternatively, localised groundwater management techniques will be required in each area where excavations are to be undertaken.
5.6 Excavations
5.6.1 The natural strata across this site is highly variable and contains significant deposits of predominately non-cohesive sands and gravels deposits, many of which are inundated by groundwater. It is our opinion that majority of excavations made upon this site are likely to be highly unstable and subject to extensive and sudden side collapse without warning. Management of groundwater may improve the general stability of excavations, however it is important to recognise that catastrophic collapse of any excavation made within this site represents a very significant hazard.
5.6.2 It is essential therefore that personnel should not be allowed to approach or enter any excavation made upon this site unless appropriate precautions have been adopted to ensure that hazardous side instability and significant groundwater entry has been prevented. This is particularly important in relation to foundation and drainage construction where personnel may be specifically required to enter deeper excavations for essential construction purposes. Reference should be made to H.S.E. publication HSG 150 for guidance.
5.7 Contamination
5.7.1 The intrusive investigations have identified made ground only within the vicinity of TP 6. The material present at this trial pit appears to be associated with the remedial works undertaken to the adjoining site. The presence of anthropogenic materials within the made ground indicate the potential for contaminants to be present within this strata. The underlying natural strata is not considered to contain any naturally occurring contaminants.
5.8 Sampling
5.8.1 Based upon the initial site appraisal in conjunction with the findings of the intrusive investigations a series of representative samples of the strata encountered have been retained for laboratory analyses. These analyses have been intended to determine the potential presence of any contamination which may represent a hazard to site operatives or end users of the site. This section of the work is considered in more detail in section 7 of this report.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 5.9 Index Testing
5.9.1 A total of seven (7 No.) samples of clay strata encountered during these investigations have been returned to a civil engineering laboratory to determine their index properties. Copies of the laboratory tests are appended to this report for reference. Consideration of these results confirms that generally the clay soils within the site have a plasticity index in the range of 15 - 30%. Assessment of these results suggests that the clays associated with the shallow alluvial deposits appear to have a raised plasticity index. Accordingly at this time we would recommend that the clay soils within this site be considered to have a medium volume change potential as defined by NHBC Handbook Chapter 4.2.
5.10 Ground Gases
5.10.1 The desk study information has not identified any landfill or licensed waste sites within 500m of the study site area. Clearly the adjoining site has been subject to a program of remediation within the recent past but this has not resulted in any condition which may give rise to the generation of toxic or explosive gases. We therefore consider that there is no potential source of toxic or explosive gases within the site and the site may be classified as Characteristic Situation 1 as defined by CIRIA publication C665 and Green as defined by NHBC Report No. 4.
5.11 SUDS
5.11.1 Assessment of the ground conditions present within this site in terms of sustainable urban drainage confirms that the presence of extensive cohesive deposits coupled with saturated non-cohesive material suggests that the strata across the site should be considered to be effectively impermeable. Accordingly it is our opinion that the ground conditions within this site are not conducive to the adoption of a soakaway system of surface water drainage disposal.
6.0 CONTAMINATION ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
6.1 Sampling
6.1.1 This investigation has identified made ground overlying natural strata over the whole of the site. A total of seven (7 No.) samples of the ground strata obtained during this investigation have been retained for chemical analysis. These samples relate to made ground located across the whole site. These samples are considered to be representative of the ground conditions within the site and form a basis for assessment of their potential for reuse within a residential environment.
6.1.2 All samples obtained from this site were considered to be subject to a program of PAH analyses. Accordingly all samples have been placed into a 500ml wide necked brown glass jar. All soil samples have been stored in cool boxes at temperatures of approximately 4º (+ or - 2ºC) until delivery to the selected laboratory. All sample containers were marked with the site address, trial pit or borehole number, depth and date of sampling. All samples have been tested within the specified handling period to accord with the sampling protocol presented by Exova Laboratories.
6.2 Range
6.2.1 Made ground has been identified within the site and representative samples of this material have been retained for analysis to determine whether it is suitable for reuse and retention within the proposed development.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 6.2.2 Natural strata has been identified within all the exploratory holes underlying the made ground material. This natural strata comprises of varying firm to stiff clays which do not contain any visual or olfactory evidence of contamination. Accordingly the natural strata present within this site is considered to be suitable for the retention within the residential environment.
6.3 Laboratory
6.3.1 All samples selected for chemical analyses have been returned to Exova Ltd., who are an MCERTS and UKAS accredited laboratory facility. Each sample has been subject to a range of chemical analyses to determine the concentrations of a wide range of common contaminants applicable to the former use of this site and the materials present. Details of the analysis program are shown in table 6 below. Confirmation of the UKAS and MCERTS accreditations for each test is indicated within the results which are appended to this report.
6.4 Development Proposals
6.4.1 We understand that the site is to be re-developed in a residential manner with associated rear garden areas, areas of hard standing and access roads. It is essential to ensure that the materials present within the sensitive site areas are suitable for retention within a residential environment.
6.5 Analysis Range
6.5.1 The preliminary conceptual model identifies that there is the potential for a pollutant pathway linkage to be present at the site and that further assessment is required. Table 6 below confirms the range of analyses undertaken upon the samples of topsoil and made ground obtained from this site.
Table 6: Chemical Testing Schedule Analysis Determinands No. of Samples Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium (total), Metals Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Selenium, 7 Zinc Organics PAH – USEPA 16 suite, Phenol 7 Cyanide, Soluble sulphates, Sulphide, pH, Inorganics 7 TOC Hydrocarbons TPH (CWG) 3 Asbestos Asbestos Fibres 4
6.6 Results
6.6.1 Full details of the chemical analyses results are appended to this report for reference and should be read in conjunction with the comments and recommendations regarding risk assessments. Summaries of the test results are presented in conjunction with the current assessment criteria in Section 7 of this report.
6.7 Approach
6.7.1 The current UK approach to the consideration of contaminated land is based upon the principles of risk assessment. This in turn is founded upon the use of a source-pathway-target principle in order to establish the presence of a potential pollutant linkage. Our approach to the risk assessment is consistent with UK guidance and best practice.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd As advocated in the EA Policy Statement: Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management a tiered approach has been adopted. This tiered approach is central to Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
6.8 Site Classification
6.8.1 Although no proposed site layout is available for this site, we can confirm that it is intended to be developed on a private residential basis utilising large areas of private gardens. Accordingly the site usage has been considered on the basis of an end land use of residential as defined by EA Science Report SC050021/SR3 2009 in relation to the most recent soil guideline values.
6.9 Criteria
6.9.1 The concentrations of contaminants within the ground have been compared to a range of generic soil guideline values that have been prepared by DEFRA and the Environment Agency. Where published, soil guideline values (SGV) have been utilised as intervention values for the purpose of an initial tier 1 assessment.
6.9.2 At the time of the preparation of this report soil guideline values were available only for a limited number of contaminants and the development of both the CLEA model and additional soil guideline values is on-going. Where published soil guideline values are available they have been utilised as intervention values for the purposes of an initial tier 1 assessment. A number of SGV’s have recently been updated to reflect a modern approach to the protection of human health.
6.9.3 In March 2014 the Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs published SP1010: Development of Category 4 Screening Levels for Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination Policy Companion Document. This document provides a series of Category 4 screening levels based upon differing land uses. Reference has been made to the values presented within this report in relation to the appropriate land usage.
6.9.4 Where soil guideline values were not published at the time of preparing this report, generic assessment criteria (GAC) published by Land Quality Management Ltd., in conjunction with the Chartered Institute Of Environmental Health have been adopted. The values published in the “LQM/CIEH S4UL’s for Human Health Risk Assessment” Registration No. S4UL3265.
6.9.5 Reference has also been made to published soil screening values presented by Atkins Ltd., under their Atrisk Subscription Service. The SSVs have been adopted where SGVs or GACs are not available. The remaining contaminants have been considered based upon information that was the best available at the time of the study.
7.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS & QUALITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
7.1 Model 7.1.1 As discussed above, assessment of contaminated land is based upon a simple assessment of pollutant linkages referred to as the source-pathway-target model. This assessment considers the current or proposed usage of the site in terms of suitability for use. This implies the use of risk assessment in principle in order to evaluate the potential effects and concerns of contamination on a site-specific basis.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 7.1.2 Initial assessment of the chemical analyses results has been undertaken to assess the concentrations of determinands in relation to tier 1 assessment criteria. The summary of these test results is detailed below.
7.2 Results Summary
7.2.1 The samples were obtained from the made ground deposits from across the site. The differing strata have initially been assessed together with a more detailed assessment of any samples which exceed the assessment criteria. Tables 7 to 10 have been prepared as a summary of the laboratory analyses depending upon the class of analyses undertaken and the strata type present. The test results have been compared to the adopted assessment criteria, relating to a proposed residential with home grown produce land usage.
7.3 Metals & Inorganics
7.3.1 Table 7 below indicates the range of contaminants that were included within the metals and inorganics analyses along with their respective assessment criteria. The review of the results has identified no exceedances of any of the assessment criteria and all contaminants tested are considered to lie within acceptable ranges in terms of human health.
Table 7: Summary of Contamination Analysis – Metals & Inorganics – Made Ground
No. of No. of Range of Assessment Samples Locations Samples Values (mg/kg) Criteria (mg/kg) Failing Arsenic 7 5.4 – 34.8 373 0 Cadmium 7 0.1 – 1.3 11.03 0 - Chromium (total) 7 42.8 – 79.6 9103 0 - Copper 7 18 – 64 24003 0 - 1 Lead 7 22 – 153 200 0 - 3 Mercury 7 <0.1 40 0 - Nickel 7 17.4 – 44.8 1803 0 - 3 Selenium 7 <1.0 – 2.0 250 0 - Zinc 7 66 – 255 37003 0 - Total Cyanide 7 <0.5 34.23 0 - Phenol 7 <0.15 – 0.17 1203 0 - pH 7 5.96 – 7.93 - 0 - SOM% 7 2.98 – 13.3 - 0 - 5 SO4 (2:1) 7 0.015 – 0.23 0.5 0 - Asbestos 4 N.D. Present/Absent 0 - 1 DEFRA : SP1010 : Category 4 Screening Levels 2 Atkins Atrisk SSV residential without home grown produce (1% SOM) 3 LQM and CIEH S4UL’s for Human Health Risk Assessment (Registration No. S4UL 3265) – residential with home grown produce (1% SOM) 4 BRE Special Digest 1:2005 DS-1. N.D. – None detected.
7.4 Speciated PAH
7.4.1 The made ground samples retained from the site investigation have been subject to a programme of analyses which have assessed the concentrations of the individual constituents of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon series. A summary of these results is shown in table 8 below. The assessment criteria utilised are based upon the presence of 1% soil organic matter within the samples generally. Reference to the tests results does however show more variable soil organic matter content.
Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd
Table 8: Summary of Contamination Analysis: Organics : PAH USEPA 16 Suite - Made Ground Range of No. of No. of Assessment Values 1 Samples Locations Samples 3 Criteria (mg/kg (mg/kg) Failing Acenaphthene 7 7.4.2 Assessment of table 8 above has not identified any elevated concentrations of PAH compounds therefore PAH compounds are not considered to pose a potential hazard to long term end users of the site. 7.5 TPH (CWG) 7.5.1 Chemical analysis has been extended to the hydrocarbon range and assessment of table 9 below indicates that even though hydrocarbon concentrations have been identified they have not exceeded the adopted assessment criteria. Therefore hydrocarbon contamination is not considered to pose a potential hazard to long term end users of the site. Table 9 : Summary of Contamination Analysis: Organics: TPH (CWG) Suite No. of Range of Assessment* No. of Notes Samples Values Criteria Samples mg/kg2 mg/kg Failing Aliphatic EC> 5 - 6 3 7.6.1 Hydrocarbon analysis has been extended to the BTEX range and assessment of table 10 below has confirmed that all BTEX hydrocarbons are present at lower than the limit of detection. Therefore BTEX concentrations do not pose a hazard to long term end users of the site. Table 10: Summary of Contamination Analysis: Organics: BTEX Suite No. of Range of Assessment* No. of Notes Samples Values Criteria Samples (mg/kg)2 (mg/kg) Failing Benzene 3 7.7 Sulphates 7.7.1 Within the program of laboratory testing each sample has also been analysed to determine the concentration of water soluble sulphates within the ground. Reference to the laboratory results presented by Exova confirms that soluble sulphates are present at concentrations of 0.015 – 0.23g/l. Reference to BRE Special Publication 1 : 2005 “Concrete in Aggressive Ground” confirms that at <0.5g/l, the design sulphate class for this site is DS-1. Accordingly the ACEC class for the site is assessed to be AC-1s on the basis that the site does not have mobile groundwater and the pH value is >5.5. Reference to Table D of BRE Special Publication 1 indicates that the DC class for this site should be considered to be DC-1. 7.8 Ground gases 7.8.1 The desk study information has not identified any landfills within 500m of the site boundary and the site investigation has not identified any deep deposits of made ground material or organic matter with the potential to generate toxic or explosive gases within the site itself. Therefore there has not been a requirement for a full programme of ground gas monitoring as part of the investigation. 8.0 DISCUSSIONS 8.1 General 8.1.1 The desk study information has confirmed a recorded history of the site as agricultural or open rural land since prior to available records. The site contains no evidence of any development having taken place in the past, though it is impacted at the extreme south eastern corner by the adjoining development and associated remediation works. It contains extensive areas of trees and vegetation, some of which may be subject to preservation orders and may require protection during the proposed development activities. Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 8.1.2 The investigations have demonstrated that the site predominately contains naturally occurring strata which at very shallow depth appears to comprise of glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits but these are shown to overlie glacial till. The site contains extensive areas of surface topsoil which will represent an important resource to the garden areas of the final development. Local made ground has been identified within the vicinity of TP 6 but this undoubtedly represents an area of remediation which has transgressed the boundary of the adjoining site at this location. 8.1.3 A program of chemical analyses undertaken upon representative samples of strata obtained during these investigations has identified no exceedances of the current assessment criteria for any of the determinands. This site is therefore not subject to any specific remediation measures and does not contain any identifiable environmental hazards. 8.2 Revised Conceptual Site Model 8.2.1 As a result of these intrusive ground investigations and subsequent program of chemical analyses, it has been possible to revise the preliminary conceptual site model presented in Section 3. The revised conceptual site model is now shown in table 9 below. This report adopts the methodology for risk evaluation presented in CIRIA report C552 ‘Contaminated Land Risk Assessment – A Guide to Good Practice’, 2001. The method is qualitative and involves the classification of the following: 8.2.2 In the context of regulatory definition of ‘Contaminated Land’ (as defined by the EPA 1990), ‘very high’ and ‘high’ risks would fall under the classification of ‘Contaminated Land’. ‘Moderate’ risk could also potentially be classified as ‘Contaminated Land’ but any lower risk rating would not. Thus the following potential exposure pathways between potential and known contaminant sources based on information provided to date and receptors are tentatively identified in table 11 below. Table 11: Revised Conceptual Site Model Potential Potential Mitigation / Possible Pathway Probability Consequence Risk Source Receptor Investigation Direct contact of soils Site personnel Inhalation or ingestion Lw Mi Very Low during construction of soil / dust Direct contact of soils Future site users Inhalation or ingestion Ul Md Very Low of soil / dust Leaching of Surface water in the contaminants through Ul Md Very Low No evidence of an vicinity of the site drainage system potential Natural strata Leaching of environmental Ground water in contaminants to Ul Md Very Low hazards in the aquifer ground water ground Vapour migration from Future site users Lw Mr Very Low soils Proposed buildings Direct contact with Lw Mi Very Low and services contaminated soils Plants in gardens and soft Direct contact Lw Mi Very Low landscaping Site personnel Water entering No source of Contaminated Lw Mi Very Low during construction excavations contamination to ground water Future site Users Retained surface water Lw Mi Low Very ground water. Toxic and Proposed buildings Ground gas migration CS1 (NHBC Lw Md Very Low explosive gases and occupiers into buildings Green). No radon ground Proposed buildings Ground gas migration Radon gases Ul Sv Low gas precautions and occupiers into buildings required. Key: Sv = Severe, Md = Medium, Mi = Mild, Mr = Minor Hi = High, Li = Likely, Lw = Low Likelihood, Ul = Unlikely Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 8.3 Preliminary Remediation Proposals 8.3.1 The chemical analysis of representative samples of strata obtained during these investigations has identified no exceedances of the assessment criteria applied to the various determinands. These investigations therefore confirm that this site does not require any specific remediation in terms of possible environmental hazards in the ground. 8.3.2 The site is also not subject to any possible on-site or off-site sources of toxic or explosive gases. The site is therefore classified as Characteristic Situation 1 (NHBC Green). Accordingly there are no requirements for any special precautions to be adopted within the ground floor construction of any properties located within this site. 8.4 Foundations 8.4.1 The shallow ground conditions across the site area appear to offer a safe bearing capacity of at least 100kN/m2 at depths generally in the range of 0.9m – 1.2m or so below existing ground level. It is possible that localised soft clays may require foundations to extend to greater depths, but generally the presence of stiff glacial till has been proved at depths in the order of 1.5m – 2.0m below ground level. It is however important that the apparent safe bearing capacity of the shallow strata should be considered carefully. The presence of highly variable levels of groundwater which are perched within the non-cohesive factions of the shallow superficial deposits is such that significant water entries are likely to occur in any excavations made upon this site. These water entries will undoubtedly reduce the allowable bearing capacity of the glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits with severe instability of the excavations rendering even greater difficulties. 8.4.2 Based upon the current groundwater conditions present within the site we suspect that the use of a shallow strip foundation is unlikely to be economically viable and a program of groundwater management either on a strategic scale or locally is likely to be required in all areas where excavations are undertaken. The deeper glacial deposits offer a much increased safe bearing capacity, however excavations to depths in excess of 1.5m below ground level are again likely to be severely influenced by groundwater conditions which will limit the economic viability of such a foundation solution. 8.4.3 It may be possible to undertake a program of groundwater management on a more strategic scale by the provision of a cut off drain type arrangement around the southern perimeter of the site. However, this will require the input of specialist contractors to ensure that groundwater passage through the site is substantially reduced to allow a traditional foundation solution to be adopted. Localised groundwater management adjacent to each excavation represents a possible solution, though the economic viability of such extensive works does raise concerns. 8.4.4 In the absence of a program of groundwater management it is likely that specialist foundation solutions will be required. At the present time we anticipate that the ground conditions within the site may be improved by a program of vibro stone columns (VSC) installed by a specialist contractor. Such a process will require a bottom fed system to allow for the construction of the columns which will assist in providing drainage through the superficial strata and will densify areas of strata which are in a soft or loose condition. However, it will be necessary for specialist contractors to review the ground investigation information and provide assistance regarding the extent of any techniques which may be applied to the development. Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 8.4.5 To limit the extent of any excavations required it will be possible to utilise a reinforced concrete raft foundation to the proposed properties. The raft will be required to be formed upon a layer of compacted clean inert stone to generate a suitable load transfer platform arrangement, however the shallow soils present within the site are considered to be suitable for the support of a suitably designed raft type foundation. 8.4.6 As a final alternative, the properties within this site may be provided with a piled foundation with piles extending through the upper waterlogged strata into more competent strata below. Where a pile solution is considered to be appropriate it will be necessary for further deeper investigations to be undertaken to determine the likely the length of any such piles. 8.4.7 As indicated previously, the site does contain a large number of mature and semi mature trees which will undoubtedly influence the foundation designs to the various proposed structures. It is important that a detailed arboriculturist report be undertaken at the site at an early stage to determine the tree types and heights which may impact upon the development. Ultimately, the normal approach is for deeper foundations to be employed which extend to strata which is below the likely influence zone of tree roots. However in this vicinity deeper excavations are likely to be associated with severe instability due to the presence of groundwater and as such properties which are significantly impacted by the presence of trees may be most appropriately treated by the adoption of a piled foundation. 8.5 Ground Floor Construction 8.5.1 It is recommended that suspended ground floor construction be adopted for all properties located within this site. These floors may be of a pre cast concrete beam and block arrangement or of a suitably designed cast insitu reinforced concrete. In those areas where tree root effects are important it is recommended that a pre cast concrete beam and block type floor is utilised to allow for the provision of a suitable air void and heave precautions below the ground floor construction. 8.6 Flooding 8.6.1 The desk study has confirmed that the northern and eastern portions of this site may be subject to Zone 2 and Zone 3 flooding effects in severe weather conditions. It is recommended that consultations be held with the Environment Agency to determine any requirements for minimum finished floor levels to appropriate properties. At the present time it is acknowledged that the flood plains appear to be associated with the area set aside for public open space, but here again this should be agreed with the Environment Agency as representing a suitable solution. 9.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1 Remediation 9.1.1 The investigations undertaken at this site have identified no evidence of any significant environmental factors which may impact upon the development and which may require remediation activity. 9.1.2 There is no evidence of any on-site or off-site sources of explosive or toxic gases which may represent a potential long term hazard to the development. Accordingly the site is classified as Characteristic Situation 1 (NHBC Green) and no special precautions are required. Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 9.2 Foundations 9.2.1 Whilst natural ground has been identified at shallow depth over the whole area of this site the presence of significant water entries suggest that significant difficulties will be encountered during excavations due to instability and running sand type conditions. It is possible that a VSC solution employing a bottom fed methodology of treatment may improve the ground conditions and assist in draining the groundwater. However, it is important that recommendations regarding this method of treatment should be discussed with specialist contractors at an early stage to ensure that the techniques they offer are suitable for improvement of these types of strata. 9.2.2 It will be possible to adopt a suitably designed reinforced concrete raft foundation to the proposed properties which are to be located within this site. The choice of this type of foundation will limit the excavations required, though there will be a requirement for the construction of a thin compacted clean inert stone load transfer platform. Normal construction techniques applied to raft construction are such that we would not anticipate that these foundation works would be impacted by any groundwater issues. 9.2.3 In the absence of any foundation solution, it may be prudent to consider the provision of a driven pile type foundation with the provision of a reinforced concrete ground beam which is located at shallow depth. This foundation solution will substantially reduce all excavation requirements and this will undoubtedly improve the programing of the work along with the health and safety of all site operatives. 9.3 Ground Floor Construction 9.3.1 It is recommended that suspended ground floor construction be adopted for all properties located within this site. These floors may be of a pre cast concrete beam and block arrangement or of a suitably designed cast insitu reinforced concrete. In those areas where tree root effects are important it is recommended that a pre cast concrete beam and block type floor is utilised to allow for the provision of a suitable air void and heave precautions below the ground floor construction. 9.4 Groundwater 9.4.1 Based upon the information obtained from our intrusive investigations we are of the opinion that groundwater represents a significant hazard at this site. It will be necessary to carefully consider the provision of a system of groundwater management if excavations within the site are not to be come substantially inundated and impacted by severe instability. It is important that the presence of groundwater be identified to the civil engineering contractor who is responsible for the construction of the roads and sewers as they may be required to specifically enter deeper excavations at an increased risk. 9.5 SUDS 9.5.1 Assessment of the ground conditions present within the site in terms of sustainable urban drainage confirms the presence of significant areas of cohesive clay strata which is considered to be effectively impermeable. It is acknowledged that within the glaciofluvial and alluvial deposits there are significant bands and lenses of predominately non-cohesive sands and gravel which may be permeable. However, these bands are in the main substantially inundated by groundwater and it is extremely unlikely that any provision of soakaways will operate satisfactorily at this site. We are therefore of the opinion that the ground conditions present within this site are not conducive to the adoption of a soakaway system of surface water disposal. Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd It will therefore be necessary to provide a scheme of formal drainage to an appropriate outfall point. 9.6 Further Work 9.6.1 If any unusual or suspicious strata or ground conditions are encountered during the subsequent site stripping and preparation work it will be necessary for these areas to be bought to the attention of the appropriate authorities so that all necessary inspections, sampling and testing may be undertaken to determine whether these materials represent a hazard to human health. It is incumbent upon the site contractors to advise a responsible authority of any unusual findings within the site which may then be further investigated. 10.0 NOTES 10.1 All reports are for advisory purposes only and all design decisions are the ultimate responsibility of others. 10.2 Unless stated otherwise the investigation has been undertaken in general accordance with the recommendations given in BS 5930 : 1999 "A Code of Practice for site Investigations" and the laboratory testing has been carried out in accordance with BS 1377 : 1990 "Methods of Test for Civil Engineering Purposes". 10.3 Soil and rock descriptions are generally based on the scales of strength and relative density within BS 5930 although it should be noted that in certain circumstances descriptions are based on site records or a qualitative assessment without the benefit of in-situ or laboratory test results. 10.4 The assessment of ground conditions given in this report is based on the results of the fieldwork and laboratory testing carried out and there may be other conditions at the site not encountered by these works, which have not been taken into account. 10.5 The scope of the investigation and information provided may not necessarily reflect all the geotechnical and environmental aspects related to the site, and the omission of certain items does not mean that the site is unaffected by such problems. 10.6 It should be noted that groundwater levels can vary and may at times be significantly different to those recorded during the investigation and attention is drawn to BS 5930 which indicates that measurements may be necessary over an extended period of time to investigate changes in groundwater pressures due to seasonal, tidal and other causes. 10.7 Any recommendations on construction methods within this report are for initial guidance only and all design proposals remain the responsibility of the appropriate contractor/consultant. 10.8 Further assessment, investigation, construction activities or time may reveal conditions that were not found during the period of investigation and, therefore, could not have been taken into account in the preparation of the report and where such information might impact upon the stated opinion R. E. Fry & Associates Ltd request the opportunity to review such information and modify the report if necessary. 10.9 Where information has been obtained from sources other than the direct findings of the investigation, R. E. Fry & Associates Ltd cannot and does not guarantee the authenticity or reliability of this information. Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire. Wainhomes NW Ltd 10.10 Where opinions expressed in this report are based on current available guidelines and legislation, no liability can be accepted by R. E. Fry & Associates Ltd for the effects of any future changes to such guidelines and legislation. 10.11 This report has been prepared on the instructions and to the requirements of the named client and any unauthorised party using this information for any purpose does so at his own risk and any duty of care to that party is excluded. Signed for and on behalf of R E FRY & ASSOCIATES LIMITED R E FRY B Sc (Hons), C Eng.,MI Struct.E. Report No. 17134/GEIR REFA Consulting Engineers APPENDIX A CENTREMAPS Groundsure CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Reference: Open Space, Upper Interfields, Worcester, WR14 1UT Your Reference: 7904 Report Date 23 Aug 2017 Report Delivery Email - pdf Method: Enviro Insight Address: Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ Dear Sir/ Madam, Thank you for placing your order with Groundsure. Please find enclosed the Groundsure Enviro Insight as requested. If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our helpline on 01886 832972 quoting the above CENTREMAPS reference number. Yours faithfully, CENTREMAPS Enc. Groundsure Enviroinsight Enviro Insight Address: Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ Date: 23 Aug 2017 Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client: CENTREMAPS NW N NE W E SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 28-Sep-2011 Grid Reference: 404181,382129 Site Size: 1.56ha Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 2 Contents Page Contents Page 3 Overview of Findings 6 Using this report 10 1. Historical Land Use 11 1. Historical Industrial Sites 12 1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale Mapping...... 12 1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database...... 14 1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database...... 15 1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site Database...... 16 1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle Repair Database...... 16 1.6 Potentially Infilled Land...... 17 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map 19 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers 20 2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations...... 20 2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site:...... 20 2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site:...... 20 2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site:...... 21 2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 21 2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site:...... 21 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: ...... 21 2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations:...... 22 2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site:...... 22 2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site: ...... 23 2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site:...... 23 2.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites...... 23 2.3 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Recorded Pollution Incidents...... 23 2.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site:...... 23 2.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site:...... 24 2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990...... 24 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map 25 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites 26 3.1 Landfill Sites...... 26 3.1.1 Records from Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales landfill data within 1000m of the study site: ...... 26 3.1.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 26 3.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site:...... 27 3.1.4 Records of Landfills from Local Authority and Historical Mapping Records within 1500m of the study site:...... 27 3.2 Other Waste Sites...... 27 3.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site: ...... 27 3.2.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site: ...... 28 4. Current Land Use Map 29 4. Current Land Uses 30 4.1 Current Industrial Data...... 30 4.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites...... 30 4.3 National Grid High Voltage Underground Electricity Transmission Cables...... 30 4.4 National Grid High Pressure Gas Transmission Pipelines...... 31 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 3 5. Geology 32 5.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground...... 32 5.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology ...... 32 5.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology ...... 32 6 Hydrogeology and Hydrology 33 6a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology 33 6b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licenses 34 6c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licenses 35 6d. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones within confined aquifer 36 6e. Hydrology – Detailed River Network and River Quality 37 6.Hydrogeology and Hydrology 38 6.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits...... 38 6.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits...... 38 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences...... 39 6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences...... 46 6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences...... 48 6.6 Source Protection Zones...... 50 6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer...... 50 6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential...... 50 6.9 River Quality...... 50 6.9.1 Biological Quality:...... 51 6.9.2 Chemical Quality:...... 51 6.10 Detailed River Network...... 51 6.11 Surface Water Features...... 53 7a. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Flood Map for Planning (from rivers and the sea) 54 7b. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Map 55 7 Flooding 56 7.1 River and Coastal Zone 2 Flooding...... 56 7.2 River and Coastal Zone 3 Flooding...... 56 7.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Flood Rating...... 57 7.4 Flood Defences...... 57 7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences...... 57 7.6 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage...... 58 7.7 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas...... 58 7.7.1 Are there any British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site? Yes...... 58 7.7.2 What is the highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions?...... 58 7.8 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas...... 58 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map 59 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites 60 8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site:...... 60 8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 60 8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site:...... 60 8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site:...... 60 8.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 60 8.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site: ...... 61 8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site:...... 61 8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site:...... 61 8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site: ...... 61 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 4 8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 61 8.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site: ...... 61 8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site:...... 62 8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site:...... 62 8.14 Records of Green Belt land within 2000m of the study site:...... 62 9. Natural Hazards Findings 63 9.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data...... 63 9.1.1 Shrink Swell...... 63 9.1.2 Landslides...... 63 9.1.3 Soluble Rocks...... 63 9.1.4 Compressible Ground...... 64 9.1.5 Collapsible Rocks...... 64 9.1.6 Running Sand...... 64 9.2 Radon...... 64 9.2.1 Radon Affected Areas...... 64 9.2.2 Radon Protection...... 65 10. Mining 66 10.1 Coal Mining...... 66 10.2 Non-Coal Mining...... 66 10.3 Brine Affected Areas ...... 66 Contact Details 67 Standard Terms and Conditions 69 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 5 Overview of Findings For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the main report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded. Section 1: Historical Industrial Sites On-site 0-50 51-250 251-500 1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale 2 0 23 71 mapping 1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database 0 0 8 47 1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database 0 0 7 6 1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site 0 0 0 0 Database 1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle 0 0 0 14 Repair Database 1.6 Potentially Infilled Land 0 0 13 32 Section 2: Environmental Permits, Incidents and On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 Registers 2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Environmental Permits and/or Authorisations 2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations 0 0 0 0 2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities 0 0 4 0 2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents 0 0 0 0 2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0 2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substances Inventory sites 0 0 0 0 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements 0 0 1 0 2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances 0 0 0 0 Authorisations 2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents 0 0 0 5 2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals 0 0 0 0 2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and 0 0 0 0 Enforcements within 500m of the study site 2.2 Records of COMAH and NIHHS sites 0 0 0 0 2.3 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Recorded Pollution Incidents 2.3.1 National Incidents Recording System, List 2 0 0 2 1 2.3.2 National Incidents Recording System, List 1 0 0 0 0 2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 0 0 0 0 1990 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 6 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Section 3: Landfill and Other Waste Sites 1500 3.1 Landfill Sites 3.1.1 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Registered 0 0 0 0 0 Not searched Landfill Sites 3.1.2 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Historic 0 0 0 1 2 1 Landfill Sites 3.1.3 BGS/DoE Landfill Site Survey 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.1.4 Records of Landfills in Local Authority and Historical 0 0 0 2 0 0 Mapping Records 3.2 Landfill and Other Waste Sites Findings 3.2.1 Operational and Non-Operational Waste Treatment, 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched Transfer and Disposal Sites 3.2.2 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Licensed 0 0 0 2 0 0 Waste Sites Section 4: Current Land Use On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 4.1 Current Industrial Sites Data 0 0 5 Not searched 4.2 Records of Petrol and Fuel Sites 0 0 0 0 4.3 National Grid Underground Electricity Cables 0 0 0 0 4.4 National Grid Gas Transmission Pipelines 0 0 0 0 Section 5: Geology 5.1 Are there any records of Artificial Ground and Made Ground No present beneath the study site? 5.2 Are there any records of Superficial Ground and Drift Geology Yes present beneath the study site? 5.3 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study site see the detailed findings section. Section 6: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m 6.1 Are there any records of Strata Classification in the Superficial Yes Geology within 500m of the study site? 6.2 Are there any records of Strata Classification in the Bedrock Yes Geology within 500m of the study site? 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 2000 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 16 18 10 site) 6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 1 0 8 5 site) 6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences (within 2000m of the study 0 0 0 7 0 0 site) 6.6 Source Protection Zones (within 500m of the study site) 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched 6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer 0 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched 6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential (within 2 0 0 0 Not searched Not searched 500m of the study site) Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 7 Section 6: Hydrogeology and Hydrology 0-500m 1000- On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 1500 6.9 Is there any Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales No No No No No No information on river quality within 1500m of the study site? 6.10 Detailed River Network entries within 500m of the site 0 4 5 18 Not searched Not searched 6.11 Surface water features within 250m of the study site No Yes Yes Not searched Not searched Not searched Section 7: Flooding 7.1 Are there any Enviroment Agency Zone 2 floodplains within Yes 250m of the study site? 7.2 Are there any Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Yes Zone 3 floodplains within 250m of the study site 7.3 What is the Risk of flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Medium rating for the study site? 7.4 Are there any Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? Yes 7.5 Are there any areas benefiting from Flood Defences within No 250m of the study site? 7.6 Are there any areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the No study site? 7.7 What is the maximum BGS Groundwater Flooding susceptibility Potential at Surface within 50m of the study site? 7.8 What is the BGS confidence rating for the Groundwater High Flooding susceptibility areas? 1000- Section 8: Designated Environmentally Sensitive On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 2000 8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.5 Records of Ramsar sites 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.6 Records of Ancient Woodlands 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) 0 0 0 0 1 0 8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 8 1000- Section 8: Designated Environmentally Sensitive On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 Sites 2000 8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.11 Records of National Parks 0 0 0 0 1 0 8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.14 Records of Green Belt land 1 0 0 0 0 0 Section 9: Natural Hazards 9.1 What is the maximum risk of natural ground subsidence? Moderate 9.1.1 What is the maximum Shrink-Swell hazard rating identified Very Low on the study site? 9.1.2 What is the maximum Landslides hazard rating identified on Low the study site? 9.1.3 What is the maximum Soluble Rocks hazard rating Negligible identified on the study site? 9.1.4 What is the maximum Compressible Ground hazard rating Moderate identified on the study site? 9.1.5 What is the maximum Collapsible Rocks hazard rating Very Low identified on the study site? 9.1.6 What is the maximum Running Sand hazard rating Low identified on the study site? 9.2 Radon 9.2.1 Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the The property is not in a Radon Affected Area, as less than 1% of Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of properties are above the Action Level. homes are above the Action Level? 9.2.2 Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as No radon protective measures are necessary. described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? Section 10: Mining 10.1 Are there any coal mining areas within 75m of the study site? No 10.2 Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 50m of the study Yes site boundary? 10.3 Are there any brine affected areas within 75m of the study No site? Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 9 Using this report The following report is designed by Environmental Consultants for Environmental Professionals bringing together the most up-to-date market leading environmental data. This report is provided under and subject to the Terms & Conditions agreed between Groundsure and the Client. The document contains the following sections: 1. Historical Industrial Sites Provides information on past land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. Potentially Infilled Land features are also included. This search is conducted using radii of up to 500m. 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Provides information on Regulated Industrial Activities and Pollution Incidents as recorded by Regulatory Authorit- ies, and sites determined as Contaminated Land. This search is conducted using radii up to 500m. 3. Landfills and Other Waste Sites Provides information on landfills and other waste sites that may pose a risk to the study site. This search is conduc - ted using radii up to 1500m. 4. Current Land Uses Provides information on current land uses that may pose a risk to the study site in terms of potential contamination from activities or processes. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 500m. This includes information on potentially contaminative industrial sites, petrol stations and fuel sites as well as high pressure gas pipelines and un- derground electricity transmission lines. 5. Geology Provides information on artificial and superficial deposits and bedrock beneath the study site. 6. Hydrogeology and Hydrology Provides information on productive strata within the bedrock and superficial geological layers, abstraction licenses, Source Protection Zones (SPZs) and river quality. These searches are conducted using radii of up to 2000m. 7. Flooding Provides information on river and coastal flooding, flood defences, flood storage areas and groundwater flood areas. This search is conducted using radii of up to 250m. 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Provides information on the Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), National Nature Reserves (NNR), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA), Ramsar sites, Local Nature Reserves (LNR), Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), National Parks (NP), Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and World Heritage Sites and Scheduled Ancient Woodland. These searches are conduc- ted using radii of up to 2000m. 9. Natural Hazards Provides information on a range of natural hazards that may pose a risk to the study site. These factors include nat- ural ground subsidence and radon.. 10. Mining Provides information on areas of coal and non-coal mining and brine affected areas. 11. Contacts This section of the report provides contact points for statutory bodies and data providers that may be able to provide further information on issues raised within this report. Alternatively, Groundsure provide a free Technical Helpline (08444 159000) for further information and guidance. Note: Maps Only certain features are placed on the maps within the report. All features represented on maps found within this search are given an identification number. This number identifies the feature on the mapping and correlates it to the additional information provided below. This identification number precedes all other information and takes the following format -Id: 1, Id: 2, etc. Where numerous features on the same map are in such close proximity that the numbers would obscure each other a letter identifier is used instead to represent the features. (e.g. Three features which overlap may be given the identifier “A” on the map and would be identified separately as features 1A, 3A, 10A on the data tables provided). Where a feature is reported in the data tables to a distance greater than the map area, it is noted in the data table as “Not Shown”. All distances given in this report are in Metres (m). Directions are given as compass headings such as N: North, E: East, NE: North East from the nearest point of the study site boundary. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 10 1. Historical Land Use NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 11 1. Historical Industrial Sites 1.1 Potentially Contaminative Uses identified from 1:10,000 scale Mapping The systematic analysis of data extracted from standard 1:10,560 and 1:10,000 scale historical maps provides the following information: Records of sites with a potentially contaminative past land use within 500m of the search boundary: 96 ID Distance [m] Direction Use Date 1A 0 On Site Forge Mill 1990 2 0 On Site Forge Mill 1975 3A 59 E Forge Mill 1924 4A 61 E Forge Mill 1949 5C 61 E Forge Mill 1938 6B 138 E Sand Pit 1924 7B 142 E Refuse Heap 1938 8C 143 E Forge Mill 1924 9AG 149 S Cuttings 1990 10D 180 E Forge Mill 1896 11D 181 E Paper Mill 1878 12 188 E Railway Building 1896 13D 192 E Mill Pond 1924 14D 197 E Mill Pond 1878 15D 199 E Mill Pond 1938 16D 199 E Mill Pond 1896 17D 201 E Mill Pond 1924 18D 203 E Mill Pond 1949 19C 207 E Unspecified Tank 1924 20C 207 E Unspecified Tank 1938 21C 207 E Unspecified Tank 1924 22E 234 E Unspecified Tanks 1924 23E 242 E Unspecified Tanks 1924 24 244 E Railway Building 1896 25E 244 E Unspecified Tanks 1938 26F 331 W Unspecified Works 1938 27I 344 W Unspecified Mill 1896 28F 344 W Unspecified Works 1949 29H 346 W Unspecified Works 1924 30G 346 W Mill Pond 1924 31G 348 W Mill Pond 1938 32 349 N Unspecified 1949 Commercial/Industrial 33H 350 W Unspecified Works 1975 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 12 34H 350 W Unspecified Works 1990 35I 359 W Paper Mill 1878 36G 359 W Mill Pond 1878 37 364 W Mill Pond 1896 38G 371 W Mill Pond 1949 39J 379 NW Unspecified Tank 1938 40J 380 NW Unspecified Tank 1949 41J 381 NW Unspecified Tank 1924 42J 381 NW Unspecified Tank 1924 43 382 E Railway Building 1896 44K 414 W Refuse Heap 1949 45K 414 W Sand Pit 1924 46L 415 NW Railway Sidings 1924 47L 415 NW Railway Sidings 1919 48L 417 NW Railway Sidings 1949 49O 417 NW Railway Sidings 1975 50 421 NW Railway Sidings 1938 51K 422 W Refuse Heap 1924 52M 423 NW Railway Building 1949 53M 426 NW Railway Building 1938 54AJ 426 E Sewage Farm 1949 55 427 NW Railway Sidings 1948 56M 431 NW Railway Building 1924 57Q 436 S Unspecified Holes 1938 58N 441 NW Railway Sidings 1897 59N 441 NW Railway Sidings 1879 60O 443 NW Railway Station 1938 61S 443 N Unspecified Works 1990 62L 444 NW Railway Station 1924 63L 444 NW Railway Station 1919 64L 446 NW Railway Station 1948 65P 448 N Railway Building 1924 66P 448 N Railway Building 1919 67P 448 N Railway Building 1879 68P 448 N Railway Building 1897 69P 448 N Railway Building 1938 70O 451 NW Railway Building 1949 71P 451 N Railway Building 1949 72P 452 N Railway Building 1948 73Q 455 S Unspecified Holes 1938 74R 455 NW Railway Building 1938 75R 457 NW Railway Building 1948 76O 460 NW Railway Building 1924 77S 464 N Railway Sidings 1948 78O 465 NW Railway Station 1949 79L 468 NW Railway Station 1975 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 13 80 469 N Railway Station 1897 81 471 N Unspecified Tank 1975 82S 472 N Railway Station 1879 83 478 W Unspecified Works 1924 84T 480 E Refuse Heap 1975 85Q 481 S Unspecified Holes 1924 86O 482 NW Railway Station 1990 87T 484 E Refuse Heap 1990 88V 486 W Mill Pond 1949 89 490 N Railway Sidings 1948 90U 493 N Cuttings 1879 91U 493 N Cuttings 1897 92V 494 W Mill Pond 1924 93 497 NW Railway Building 1949 94U 497 N Cuttings 1938 95U 498 N Cuttings 1919 96U 498 N Cuttings 1924 1.2 Additional Information – Historical Tank Database The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information. Records of historical tanks within 500m of the search boundary: 55 ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 97W 178 E Unspecified Tank 1995 98W 178 E Unspecified Tank 1996 99W 178 E Unspecified Tank 1970 100W 182 E Unspecified Tank 1987 101W 182 E Unspecified Tank 1978 102W 182 E Unspecified Tank 1990 103W 182 E Unspecified Tank 1990 104E 242 E Tanks 1921 105X 278 E Unspecified Tank 1996 106X 278 E Unspecified Tank 1995 107X 278 E Unspecified Tank 1970 108X 282 E Unspecified Tank 1978 109X 282 E Unspecified Tank 1987 110X 282 E Unspecified Tank 1990 111X 282 E Unspecified Tank 1990 112X 288 E Tanks 1996 113X 288 E Tanks 1995 114X 289 E Tanks 1970 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 14 115X 291 E Tanks 1978 116X 291 E Tanks 1990 117X 291 E Tanks 1987 118X 291 E Tanks 1990 119X 299 E Tanks 1995 120X 299 E Tanks 1996 121X 300 E Tanks 1970 122X 303 E Tanks 1987 123X 303 E Tanks 1990 124X 303 E Tanks 1978 125X 303 E Tanks 1990 126Y 310 E Tanks 1970 127Y 311 E Tanks 1995 128Y 311 E Tanks 1996 129Y 313 E Tanks 1987 130Y 313 E Tanks 1990 131Y 313 E Tanks 1978 132Y 313 E Tanks 1990 133Z 326 E Unspecified Tank 1996 134Z 326 E Unspecified Tank 1995 135Z 328 E Unspecified Tank 1970 136Z 330 E Unspecified Tank 1987 137Z 330 E Unspecified Tank 1990 138Z 330 E Unspecified Tank 1978 139Z 330 E Unspecified Tank 1990 140J 377 NW Unspecified Tank 1921 141 417 N Unspecified Tank 1938 142AA 479 E Tanks 1995 143AA 479 E Tanks 1996 144AA 481 E Tanks 1970 145AA 483 E Tanks 1987 146AA 483 E Tanks 1990 147AA 483 E Tanks 1978 148AA 483 E Tanks 1990 149AB 495 W Tanks 1994 150AB 495 W Tanks 1995 151AB 495 W Tanks 1995 1.3 Additional Information – Historical Energy Features Database The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information. Records of historical energy features within 500m of the search boundary: 13 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 15 ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 152AC 154 N Electricity Substation 1996 153AC 154 N Electricity Substation 1995 154AC 158 N Electricity Substation 1978 155AC 158 N Electricity Substation 1990 156AC 158 N Electricity Substation 1987 157AC 158 N Electricity Substation 1990 158AC 160 N Electricity Substation 1970 159AD 354 N Electricity Substation 1995 160AD 354 N Electricity Substation 1996 161AD 359 N Electricity Substation 1978 162AD 359 N Electricity Substation 1990 163AD 359 N Electricity Substation 1987 164AD 359 N Electricity Substation 1990 1.4 Additional Information – Historical Petrol and Fuel Site Database The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information. Records of historical petrol stations and fuel sites within 500m of the search boundary: 0 Database searched and no data found. 1.5 Additional Information – Historical Garage and Motor Vehicle Repair Database The systematic analysis of data extracted from High Detailed 1:1,250 and 1:2,500 scale historical maps provides the following information. Records of historical garage and motor vehicle repair sites within 500m of the search boundary: 14 ID Distance (m) Direction Use Date 165AE 392 NW Garage 1994 166AE 392 NW Garage 1995 167AE 392 NW Garage 1995 168AE 404 NW Garage 1971 169AE 405 NW Garage 1988 170AE 405 NW Garage 1989 171AE 405 NW Garage 1988 172AF 433 N Garage 1995 173AF 433 N Garage 1996 174AF 434 N Garage 1990 175AF 434 N Garage 1987 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 16 176AF 434 N Garage 1990 177AF 434 N Garage 1978 178AF 434 N Garage 1970 1.6 Potentially Infilled Land Records of Potentially Infilled Features from 1:10,000 scale mapping within 500m of the study site: 45 The following Historical Potentially Infilled Features derived from the Historical Mapping information is provided by Groundsure: ID Distance(m) Direction Use Date 179W 138 E Sand Pit 1924 180W 142 E Refuse Heap 1938 181AG 149 S Cuttings 1990 182D 192 E Mill Pond 1924 183D 197 E Mill Pond 1878 184D 199 E Mill Pond 1896 185D 199 E Mill Pond 1938 186D 201 E Mill Pond 1924 187D 203 E Mill Pond 1949 188D 205 E Reservoir 1990 189D 205 E Reservoir 1975 190AH 229 NE Reservoir 1975 191AH 229 NE Reservoir 1990 192AI 271 E Reservoir 1990 193AI 271 E Reservoir 1975 194G 346 W Mill Pond 1924 195G 348 W Mill Pond 1938 196G 359 W Mill Pond 1878 197I 364 W Mill Pond 1896 198G 371 W Water Body 1990 199G 371 W Water Body 1975 200G 371 W Mill Pond 1949 201 376 E Reservoir 1990 202K 414 W Refuse Heap 1949 203K 414 W Sand Pit 1924 204K 422 W Refuse Heap 1924 205AJ 426 E Sewage Farm 1949 206Q 436 S Unspecified Holes 1938 207Q 455 S Unspecified Holes 1938 208V 478 W Reservoirs 1975 209V 478 W Reservoirs 1990 210V 479 W Ponds 1878 211T 480 E Refuse Heap 1975 212Q 481 S Unspecified Holes 1924 213V 483 W Ponds 1896 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 17 214V 483 W Ponds 1938 215T 484 E Refuse Heap 1990 216V 486 W Ponds 1924 217V 486 W Mill Pond 1949 218U 493 N Cuttings 1897 219U 493 N Cuttings 1879 220V 494 W Mill Pond 1924 221U 497 N Cuttings 1938 222U 498 N Cuttings 1924 223U 498 N Cuttings 1919 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 18 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 19 2. Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers 2.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations Searches of information provided by the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and Local Authorities reveal the following information: 2.1.1 Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.1.2 Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site: 4 The following Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Permit Number: BV7427 Operator: Kaleidoscope Colouration Original Permit Number: BS0116 Ltd EPR Reference: - 404370 Installation Name: - Issue Date: 1-9-2003 14B 127 NE 382190 Process: COATING, PRINTING & Effective Date: 1-9-2003 TEXTILES; PRE-TREATING BY Last date noted as effective: 2004-10- WASHING ETC >10T/DAY 01 Status: Superseded By Pas Permit Number: BV7427IX Operator: Richbridge Ltd Original Permit Number: BS0116IK Installation Name: Kaleidoscope EPR Reference: - 404370 Colouration Ltd Issue Date: 1/9/2003 15B 127 NE 382190 Process: COATING, PRINTING AND Effective Date: 1/9/2003 TEXTILES; PRE-TREATING BY Last date noted as effective: 2017-04- WASHING ETC >10T/DAY 01 Status: Revoked Permit Number: BS0116 Operator: Kaleidoscope Colouration Original Permit Number: BS0116 Ltd EPR Reference: - 404370 Installation Name: - Issue Date: 22-1-2003 16B 127 NE 382190 Process: COATING, PRINTING & Effective Date: 22-1-2003 TEXTILES; PRE-TREATING BY Last date noted as effective: 2005-10- WASHING ETC >10T/DAY 03 Status: Superseded By Variation Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 20 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Permit Number: BS0116IK Operator: Richbridge Ltd Original Permit Number: BS0116IK Installation Name: Kaleidoscope EPR Reference: - 404370 Colouration Ltd Issue Date: 22/1/2003 17B 127 NE 382190 Process: COATING, PRINTING AND Effective Date: 22/1/2003 TEXTILES; PRE-TREATING BY Last date noted as effective: 2017-04- WASHING ETC >10T/DAY 01 Status: Superceded 2.1.3 Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.1.4 Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.1.5 Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.1.6 Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: 1 The following Part A(2) and Part B Activities are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Address: Dorma Enforcement: No Enforcements Notified 404400 Process: coating & enamelling process Date of Enforcement: No Enforcements 13 219 NE 382300 Status: Historical Permit Notified Permit Type: Part B Comment: No Enforcements Notified Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 21 2.1.7 Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substances Authorisations: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.1.8 Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site: 5 The following Licensed Discharge Consents records are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Address: FORGE BLEACH WORKS, CHINLEY, STOCKPORT, GREATER MANCHESTER Receiving Water: BLACK BROOK Effluent Type: TRADE DISCHARGES - Status: REVOKED - UNSPECIFIED 404600 4A 328 E PROCESS EFFLUENT - NOT WATER Issue date: - 382120 COMPANY Effective Date: 01-Jan-1980 Permit Number: 016990097 Revocation Date: 31/12/1980 Permit Version: 1 Address: FORGE BLEACH WORKS, CHINLEY, STOCKPORT, GREATER MANCHESTER Receiving Water: BLACK BROOK Effluent Type: TRADE DISCHARGES - Status: REVOKED - UNSPECIFIED 404600 5A 328 E PROCESS EFFLUENT - NOT WATER Issue date: - 382120 COMPANY Effective Date: 07-Mar-1995 Permit Number: 016990097 Revocation Date: 31/12/1995 Permit Version: 4 Address: FORGE BLEACH WORKS, CHINLEY, STOCKPORT, GREATER MANCHESTER Receiving Water: BLACK BROOK Effluent Type: TRADE DISCHARGES - Status: REVOKED - UNSPECIFIED 404600 6A 328 E PROCESS EFFLUENT - NOT WATER Issue date: - 382120 COMPANY Effective Date: 10-Jul-1989 Permit Number: 016990097 Revocation Date: 06/03/1995 Permit Version: 3 Address: FORGE BLEACH WORKS, CHINLEY, STOCKPORT, GREATER MANCHESTER Receiving Water: BLACK BROOK Effluent Type: TRADE DISCHARGES - Status: REVOKED - UNSPECIFIED 404600 7A 328 E PROCESS EFFLUENT - NOT WATER Issue date: - 382120 COMPANY Effective Date: 01-Jan-1996 Permit Number: 016990097 Revocation Date: 22/01/2003 Permit Version: 5 Address: FORGE BLEACH WORKS, CHINLEY, STOCKPORT, GREATER MANCHESTER Receiving Water: BLACK BROOK Effluent Type: TRADE DISCHARGES - Status: REVOKED - UNSPECIFIED 404600 8A 328 E PROCESS EFFLUENT - NOT WATER Issue date: - 382120 COMPANY Effective Date: 01-Jan-1981 Permit Number: 016990097 Revocation Date: 09/07/1989 Permit Version: 2 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 22 2.1.9 Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.1.10 Records of Planning Hazardous Substance Consents and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.2 Dangerous or Hazardous Sites Records of COMAH & NIHHS sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.3 Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Recorded Pollution Incidents 2.3.1 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 2 within 500m of the study site: 3 The following NIRS List 2 records are represented as points on the Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers Map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Incident Date: 13-Sep-2003 Incident Identification: 189664 Water Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 404328 1 66 E Pollutant: Atmospheric Pollutants and Land Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 382136 Effects Air Impact: Category 3 (Minor) Pollutant Description: Chemical Odour Incident Date: 27-May-2004 Water Impact: Category 2 (Significant) 404299 Incident Identification: 239960 2 98 NE Land Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 382227 Pollutant: Pollutant Not Identified Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Pollutant Description: Not Identified Incident Date: 21-Jul-2003 Water Impact: Category 3 (Minor) 404530 Incident Identification: 175281 3 268 E Land Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) 382160 Pollutant: Other Pollutant Air Impact: Category 4 (No Impact) Pollutant Description: Other Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 23 2.3.2 Records of National Incidents Recording System, List 1 within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 2.4 Sites Determined as Contaminated Land under Part 2A EPA 1990 How many records of sites determined as contaminated land under Section 78R of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 are there within 500m of the study site? 0 Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 24 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 25 3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites 3.1 Landfill Sites 3.1.1 Records from Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales landfill data within 1000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 3.1.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales historic landfill sites within 1500m of the study site: 4 The following landfill records are represented as either points or polygons on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Forge Bleach Works, Licence Issue: 30-Apr-1986 Derbyshire Licence Surrendered: 28-Apr-1994 Waste Licence: Yes Licence Holder Address: - 404800 2B 477 E Site Reference: LC15 Operator: Dorma 381900 Waste Type: Inert Licence Holder: Dorma Environmental Permitting Regulations First Recorded: 31-Dec-1920 (Waste) Reference: - Last Recorded: 31-Mar-1994 Licence Issue: 07-Mar-1990 Site Address: Wardle Fabrics Limited, Licence Surrendered: 01-Nov-1990 Derbyshire Licence Holder Address: - Waste Licence: Yes 403400 Operator: V V Household Textiles Limited 3 664 W Site Reference: LC78 382000 Licence Holder: V V Household Textiles Waste Type: Inert Limited Environmental Permitting Regulations First Recorded: 31-Dec-1989 (Waste) Reference: - Last Recorded: 31-Oct-1990 Site Address: Daisybank, Buxworth, Licence Issue: Derbyshire Licence Surrendered: Waste Licence: - Licence Holder Address: - Not 403100 830 W Site Reference: U012 Operator: - shown 382200 Waste Type: - Licence Holder: - Environmental Permitting Regulations First Recorded: - (Waste) Reference: - Last Recorded: - Site Address: Crist Quarry, Buxworth, Licence Issue: Near Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derby, Licence Surrendered: Derbyshire Licence Holder Address: - Not 402700 Waste Licence: - 1244 W Operator: - shown 381900 Site Reference: - Licence Holder: - Waste Type: - First Recorded: 31-Dec-1964 Environmental Permitting Regulations Last Recorded: - (Waste) Reference: - Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 26 3.1.3 Records of BGS/DoE non-operational landfill sites within 1500m of the study site: 1 The following landfill records are represented as points on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Address: Crist Quarry, Buxworth, nr Risk: Serious risk to minor aquifer Not 402700.0 1403 W Chapel-en-le-Frith, Der Waste Type: Toxic Waste in Quarry in shown 381900.0 BGS Number: 42.0 Chatsworth Grit (100 ') 3.1.4 Records of Landfills from Local Authority and Historical Mapping Records within 1500m of the study site: 2 The following landfill records are represented as points or polygons on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map: Distance ID Direction NGR Site Address Source Data Type (m) 404778 8 477 E Refuse Tip 1970 mapping Polygon 382004 404792 9B 483 E Refuse Tip 1968 mapping Polygon 381972 3.2 Other Waste Sites 3.2.1 Records of waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 27 3.2.2 Records of Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales licensed waste sites within 1500m of the study site: 2 The following waste treatment, transfer or disposal sites records are represented as points on the Landfill and Other Waste Sites map: Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Site Address: Stephanie Works, Chinley, Issue Date: 16/12/1993 High Peak, Derbyshire, SK23 6BT Effective Date: - Type: Material Recycling Treatment Modified: - Facility Surrendered Date: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Expiry Date: - 403609 6A 476 W Environmental Permitting Regulations Cancelled Date: - 382174 (Waste) Licence Number: PVC001 Status: Issued EPR reference: - Site Name: P V C Group Works Plc Operator: P V C Group Works Plc Correspondence Address: Stephanie Waste Management licence No: 53483 Works, Chinley, High Peak, Derbyshire, Annual Tonnage: 2083.33 SK23 6BT Site Address: Stephanie Works, Chinley, Issue Date: 16/12/1993 High Peak, Derbyshire, SK23 6BT Effective Date: - Type: Physical Treatment Facility Modified: - Size: < 25000 tonnes Surrendered Date: 0 403609 Environmental Permitting Regulations 7A 476 W Expiry Date: 0 382174 (Waste) Licence Number: PVC001 Cancelled Date: 0 EPR reference: EA/EPR/TP3592CB/A001 Status: Revoked Operator: P V C Group Works Plc Site Name: P V C Group Works Plc Waste Management licence No: 53483 Correspondence Address: - Annual Tonnage: 2083.33 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 28 4. Current Land Use Map NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 29 4. Current Land Uses 4.1 Current Industrial Data Records of potentially contaminative industrial sites within 250m of the study site: 5 The following records are represented as points on the Current Land Uses map. Distance Directio ID Company NGR Address Activity Category (m) n Rural Pest 404119 63, Green Lane, Chinley, 1 105 N Pest and Vermin Control Contract Services Control 382298 High Peak, SK23 6BN 404055 Infrastructure and 2 149 S Pylon SK23 Electrical Features 381947 Facilities Electricity 404130 Infrastructure and 3 163 N SK23 Electrical Features Sub Station 382357 Facilities 404391 Infrastructure and 4 184 SE Pylon SK23 Electrical Features 381926 Facilities 404463 5 187 E Tank SK23 Tanks (Generic) Industrial Features 382082 4.2 Petrol and Fuel Sites Records of petrol or fuel sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 4.3 National Grid High Voltage Underground Electricity Transmission Cables This dataset identifies the high voltage electricity transmission lines running between generating power plants and electricity substations. The dataset does not include the electricity distribution network (smaller, lower voltage cables distributing power from substations to the local user network). This information has been extracted from databases held by National Grid and is provided for information only with no guarantee as to its completeness or accuracy. National Grid do not offer any warranty as to the accuracy of the available data and are excluded from any liability for any such inaccuracies or errors. Records of National Grid high voltage underground electricity transmission cables within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 30 4.4 National Grid High Pressure Gas Transmission Pipelines This dataset identifies high-pressure, large diameter pipelines which carry gas between gas terminals, power stations, compressors and storage facilities. The dataset does not include the Local Transmission System (LTS) which supplies gas directly into homes and businesses. This information has been extracted from databases held by National Grid and is provided for information only with no guarantee as to its completeness or accuracy. National Grid do not offer any warranty as to the accuracy of the available data and are excluded from any liability for any such inaccuracies or errors. Records of National Grid high pressure gas transmission pipelines within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 31 5. Geology 5.1 Artificial Ground and Made Ground Database searched and no data found. The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer. 5.2 Superficial Ground and Drift Geology The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer. Lex Code Description Rock Type TILLD-DMTN TILL, DEVENSIAN DIAMICTON ALV-XCZSV ALLUVIUM CLAY, SILT, SAND AND GRAVEL TILLD-DMTN TILL, DEVENSIAN DIAMICTON 5.3 Bedrock and Solid Geology The database has been searched on site, including a 50m buffer. Lex Code Description Rock Type MUDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND MG-MDSS MILLSTONE GRIT GROUP [SEE ALSO MIGR] SANDSTONE MUDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND MG-MDSS MILLSTONE GRIT GROUP [SEE ALSO MIGR] SANDSTONE (Derived from the BGS 1:50,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain) Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 32 6 Hydrogeology and Hydrology 6a. Aquifer Within Superficial Geology NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 33 6b. Aquifer Within Bedrock Geology and Abstraction Licenses NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 34 6c. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones and Potable Water Abstraction Licenses NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 35 6d. Hydrogeology – Source Protection Zones within confined aquifer NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 36 6e. Hydrology – Detailed River Network and River Quality NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 37 6.Hydrogeology and Hydrology 6.1 Aquifer within Superficial Deposits Are there records of strata classification within the superficial geology at or in proximity to the property? Yes From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the Groundsure Enviro Insight User Guide. The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Superficial Geology Map (6a): Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 1 0 On Site Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 7 0 On Site general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 8 34 NE general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Assigned where it is not possible to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In Secondary 9 67 W general these layers have previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer (undifferentiated) in different locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 2 340 NE Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers 6.2 Aquifer within Bedrock Deposits Are there records of strata classification within the bedrock geology at or in proximity to the property?Yes From 1 April 2010, the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales's Groundwater Protection Policy has been using aquifer designations consistent with the Water Framework Directive. For further details on the designation and interpretation of this information, please refer to the Groundsure Enviro Insight User Guide. The following aquifer records are shown on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b): Distanc ID Direction Designation Description e (m) Permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than 1 0 On Site Secondary A strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 38 6.3 Groundwater Abstraction Licences Are there any Groundwater Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? Yes The following Abstraction Licences records are represented as points, lines and regions on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b): Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: S7293 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 3A 386 W Region 382200 Expiry Date: - Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 103 Chinley Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 4A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: - Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 5A 386 W Region 382200 Expiry Date: - Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 102 Chinley $153 Version Start Date: 10/7/2000 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Active Annual Volume (m³): 180000 Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): 720 Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: NPS/WR/024817 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 6A 386 W Region 382200 Expiry Date: - Point: Boreholes X 2 At Stephanie Works Issue No: 105 Chinley Version Start Date: 15/11/2016 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: S7293 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 7A 386 W Region 382200 Expiry Date: - Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 103 Chinley $153 Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 39 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 8A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Chinley $153 Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: S7293 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 9A 386 W Region 382200 Expiry Date: - Point: "two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 103 Chinley $153" Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: "Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services" 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 10A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: "two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Chinley $153" Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Active Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): 180000 Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): 720 (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: NPS/WR/024817 Services 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 11A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 105 Point: Boreholes X 2 At Stephanie Works Version Start Date: 15/11/2016 Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 12B 498 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382000 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: S7293 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 13B 498 W Region 382000 Expiry Date: - Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 103 Chinley Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 40 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: - Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 14B 498 W Region 382000 Expiry Date: - Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 102 Chinley Version Start Date: 10/7/2000 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Active Annual Volume (m³): 180000 Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): 720 Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: NPS/WR/024817 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 15B 498 W Region 382000 Expiry Date: - Point: Boreholes X 2 At Stephanie Works Issue No: 105 Chinley Version Start Date: 15/11/2016 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Status: Active Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): 180000 Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): 720 (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: NPS/WR/024817 Services 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 16B 498 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382000 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 105 Point: Boreholes X 2 At Stephanie Works Version Start Date: 15/11/2016 Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: "Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services" 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 17B 498 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382000 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: "two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Chinley" Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009160 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Non-Evaporative Cooling Original Application No: S7293 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 18B 498 W Region 382000 Expiry Date: - Point: "two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Issue No: 103 Chinley" Version Start Date: 1/8/2002 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 149472.48 Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): 665.08 Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 19C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 41 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 149472.48 Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): 665.08 Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 20C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 21C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 101 Premises, Forge Bleach W Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 22C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 101 Premises, Forge Bleach W Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 23C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: "reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 100 Premises, Forge Bleach W" Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 24C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: "reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 100 Premises, Forge Bleach W" Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 25C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404780 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 26C 504 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 42 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 149472.48 Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): 665.08 Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 27D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 28D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 101 Premises, Forge Ble Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 29D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 101 Premises, Forge Ble Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 149472.48 Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): 665.08 Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 30D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 31D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: "reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 100 Premises, Forge Ble$134" Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 32D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: "reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 100 Premises, Forge Ble$134" Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 33D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 100 Premises, Forge Ble$134 Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 43 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 34D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes (2) At Issue No: 100 Premises, Forge Ble$134 Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 35D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009026 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Original Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 404460 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 36D 595 NE Region 382700 Expiry Date: - Point: Reservoir Fed By Boreholes X 2 At Issue No: 101 Premises Chinley Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009061 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 1852 Not 403900 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 10/2/1966 1297 S shown 380800 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Spring Fed Catchpit At Bradshaw Hall Issue No: 100 Farm, Chapel-en-le-frit Version Start Date: 10/2/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: WRIGHT Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009061 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 1852 Not 403900 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 10/2/1966 1297 S shown 380800 Region Expiry Date: - Point: "spring Fed Catchpit At Bradshaw Hall Issue No: 100 Farm, Chapel-en-le-frit" Version Start Date: 10/2/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: WRIGHT Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009165 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: - Not 402740 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 10/10/1996 1428 W shown 382650 Region Expiry Date: - Point: "a Borehole At Chinley House Farm, Issue No: 101 Buxworth, Whaley Bridge" Version Start Date: 28/6/2000 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: JOHN RIGBY Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 44 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Active Licence No: 2569009165 Annual Volume (m³): 10950 Details: General Use Relating To Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): 30 Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 7348 Not 402740 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 10/10/1996 1428 W shown 382650 Region Expiry Date: - Point: A Borehole At Chinley House Farm, Issue No: 102 Buxworth, Whaley Bridge Version Start Date: 1/4/2008 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: JOHN RIGBY Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009106 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 2042 Not 402800 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 16/3/1966 1828 SW shown 380800 Region Expiry Date: - Point: "spring Fed Drinking Troughs At Issue No: 100 Ollerenshaw Farm,whaley " Version Start Date: 16/3/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: HODGSON Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009106 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 2042 Not 402800 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 16/3/1966 1828 SW shown 380800 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Spring Fed Drinking Troughs At Issue No: 100 Ollerenshaw Farm,whaley Version Start Date: 16/3/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: HODGSON Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009058 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 1849 Not 405000 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 16/2/1966 1908 NE shown 383900 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Spring Fed Catchpit At Bole Hill Farm, Issue No: 100 Chinley Version Start Date: 16/2/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: JENKINS Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009064 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 1899 Not 405000 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 15/2/1966 1908 NE shown 383900 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Spring Fed Catchpit At Greengates, Issue No: 100 Hayfield Road, Chinley Version Start Date: 15/2/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: RATCLIFFE Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009064 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 1899 Not 405000 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 15/2/1966 1908 NE shown 383900 Region Expiry Date: - Point: "spring Fed Catchpit At Greengates, Issue No: 100 Hayfield Road, Chinley" Version Start Date: 15/2/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: RATCLIFFE Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 45 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009058 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Original Application No: 1849 Not 405000 Direct Source: Ground Water - North West Original Start Date: 16/2/1966 1908 NE shown 383900 Region Expiry Date: - Point: "spring Fed Catchpit At Bole Hill Farm, Issue No: 100 Chinley" Version Start Date: 16/2/1966 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: JENKINS 6.4 Surface Water Abstraction Licences Are there any Surface Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? Yes The following Surface Water Abstraction Licences records are represented as points, lines and regions on the Aquifer within Bedrock Geology Map (6b): Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Status: Active Annual Volume (m³): 154000 Licence No: 2569009161 Max Daily Volume (m³): 3345 Details: Lake & Pond Throughflow Application No: NPS/WR/024818 404300 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 47 164 N 382300 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Otter Brook At Chinley Issue No: 102 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 15/11/2016 Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Version End Date: Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 397775 Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): 1091 Details: Process water Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404810 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 48E 536 E Region 382020 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy And Black Brooks Feeding Issue No: 101 Reservoir At Forge Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404810 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 49E 536 E Region 382020 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy And Black Brks Feeding Issue No: 101 Reservoir At Forge Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404810 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 50E 536 E Region 382020 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy And Black Brks Feeding Issue No: 100 Reservoir At Forge $135 Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 46 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Process water Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404810 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 51E 536 E Region 382020 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy And Black Brks Feeding Issue No: 101 Reservoir At Forge Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Boiler Feed Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404810 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 52E 536 E Region 382020 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy And Black Brks Feeding Issue No: 100 Reservoir At Forge $135 Version Start Date: 4/2/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: DORMA CVHF LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 397775 Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): 1091 Details: Boiler Feed Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404810 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 53E 536 E Region 382020 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy And Black Brooks Feeding Issue No: 101 Reservoir At Forge Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 397775 Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): 1091 Details: Process water Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404840 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 54F 564 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy & Black Brks Feeding Issue No: 101 Reservoir @ Forge Bleach Wks Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): 397775 Licence No: 2569009027 Max Daily Volume (m³): 1091 Details: Boiler Feed Application No: 0518 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West 404840 Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 55F 564 E Region 382040 Expiry Date: - Point: New Smithy & Black Brks Feeding Issue No: 101 Reservoir @ Forge Bleach Wks Version Start Date: 1/10/2003 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: KALEIDOSCOPE COLOURATION LTD Status: Active Licence No: 2569009009 Annual Volume (m³): 600000 Details: General Cooling (Existing Licences Only) Max Daily Volume (m³): 3273.2 (Low Loss) Application No: CW0315 Not 405600 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West Original Start Date: 7/2/1966 1374 E shown 381700 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Black Brook At Chapel-en-le-frith Issue No: 102 Data Type: Point Version Start Date: 14/7/1998 Name: FEDERAL MOGUL FRICTION PRODUCTS Version End Date: LTD Status: Active Licence No: 2569009146 Annual Volume (m³): 7964.59 Details: General Use Relating To Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): 21.82 Category (Medium Loss) Application No: 2762 Not 403300 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West Original Start Date: 26/5/1988 1518 SW shown 380800 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Spring Fed Catchment Tank At Woodside Issue No: 101 Farm Tunstead Milton Version Start Date: 1/4/2007 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: MISS AJ SWIFT AND GB FORD Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 47 Distance ID Direction NGR Details (m) Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009146 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Application No: 2762 Not 403300 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West Original Start Date: 26/5/1988 1518 SW shown 380800 Region Expiry Date: - Point: Spring Fed Catchment Tank At Woodside Issue No: 101 Farm,tunstead M Version Start Date: 1/4/2004 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: MISS AJ SWIFT AND GB FORD Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009146 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: General use relating to Secondary Max Daily Volume (m³): - Category (Medium Loss) Application No: 2762 Not 403300 Direct Source: "surface, Non-tidal - North West Original Start Date: 26/5/1988 1518 SW shown 380800 Region" Expiry Date: - Point: "spring Fed Catchment Tank At Woodside Issue No: 100 Farm,tunstead M" Version Start Date: 26/5/1988 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: WILSON Status: Historical Annual Volume (m³): - Licence No: 2569009163 Max Daily Volume (m³): - Details: Lake & Pond Throughflow Application No: 7302 Direct Source: Surface, Non-tidal - North West Not 402200 Original Start Date: 1/3/1995 1886 W Region shown 382090 Expiry Date: - Point: Black Brook At Bugsworth Canal Basin Issue No: 100 Buxworth Version Start Date: 13/3/1997 Data Type: Point Version End Date: Name: EDGAR 6.5 Potable Water Abstraction Licences Are there any Potable Water Abstraction Licences within 2000m of the study site? Yes The following Potable Water Abstraction Licences records are represented as points, lines and regions on the SPZ and Potable Water Abstraction Licences Map (6c): Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: "Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services" 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 1A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: "two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: Chinley $153" Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 2A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: Chinley $153 Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 48 Distanc ID Direction NGR Details e (m) Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 3A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Active Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): 180000 Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): 720 (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: NPS/WR/024817 Services 403700 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 4A 386 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382200 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 105 Point: Boreholes X 2 At Stephanie Works Version Start Date: Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 5B 498 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382000 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: Two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Historical Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): - Details: "Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): - (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: S7293 Services" 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 6B 498 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382000 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 103 Point: "two Boreholes At Stephanie Works, Version Start Date: Chinley" Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: PVC GROUP PLC Status: Active Licence No: 2569009160 Annual Volume (m³): 180000 Details: Drinking, Cooking, Sanitary, Washing, Max Daily Volume (m³): 720 (Small Garden) - Commercial/Industrial/Public Original Application No: NPS/WR/024817 Services 403600 Original Start Date: 27/10/1994 7B 498 W Direct Source: Ground Water - North West 382000 Expiry Date: - Region Issue No: 105 Point: Boreholes X 2 At Stephanie Works Version Start Date: Chinley Version End Date: Data Type: Point Name: Vinyl Partners LLP Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 49 6.6 Source Protection Zones Are there any Source Protection Zones within 500m of the study site? No Database searched and no data found. 6.7 Source Protection Zones within Confined Aquifer Are there any Source Protection Zones within the Confined Aquifer within 500m of the study site? No Historically, Source Protection Zone maps have been focused on regulation of activities which occur at or near the ground surface, such as prevention of point source pollution and bacterial contamination of water supplies. Sources in confined aquifers were often considered to be protected from these surface pressures due to the presence of a low permeability confining layer (e.g. glacial till, clay). The increased interest in subsurface activities such as onshore oil and gas exploration, ground source heating and cooling requires protection zones for confined sources to be marked on SPZ maps where this has not already been done. Database searched and no data found. 6.8 Groundwater Vulnerability and Soil Leaching Potential Is there any Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales information on groundwater vulnerability and soil leaching potential within 500m of the study site? Yes Distance Direction Classification Soil Vulnerability Category Description (m) Soils in which pollutants are unlikely to penetrate the soil layer because Minor Aquifer/Low Leaching 0 On Site L either water movement is largely Potential horizontal, or they have the ability to attenuate diffuse pollutants. Coarse textured or moderately shallow soils which readily transmit non-adsorbed pollutants and liquid Minor Aquifer/High Leaching 0 On Site H3 discharges but have some ability to Potential attenuate adsorbed pollutants because of their clay or organic matter content. 6.9 River Quality Is there any Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales information on river quality within 1500m of the study site? No Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 50 6.9.1 Biological Quality: Database searched and no data found. 6.9.2 Chemical Quality: Database searched and no data found. 6.10 Detailed River Network Are there any Detailed River Network entries within 500m of the study site? Yes The following Detailed River Network records are represented on the Hydrology Map (6e): Distanc ID Direction Details e (m) River Name: Black Brook River Type: Primary River 1 8 N Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Culvert 2 20 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Black Brook River Type: Primary River 3 49 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Otter Brook River Type: Primary River 4 49 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 5 71 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Drain River Type: Tertiary River 6 155 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Black Brook River Type: Primary River 7 156 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Culvert 8 218 SE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Otter Brook River Type: Lake/Reservoir 9 234 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 10 265 S Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Otter Brook River Type: Primary River 11 288 NE Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 12 361 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 51 Distanc ID Direction Details e (m) River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 13 363 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 14 364 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Secondary River 15 368 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Black Brook River Type: Primary River 16 370 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Secondary River 17 373 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 18 378 SW Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 19 409 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Lake/Reservoir 20 415 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Secondary River 21A 436 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Secondary River 22A 437 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Culvert 23 439 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Culvert 24 453 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 25 466 E Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: Black Brook River Type: Primary River 26 471 W Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - River Name: - River Type: Tertiary River 27 493 SW Welsh River Name: - Main River Status: Currently Undefined Alternative Name: - Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 52 6.11 Surface Water Features Are there any surface water features within 250m of the study site? Yes The following surface water records are not represented on mapping: Distance (m) Direction 6 N 45 NW 71 E 156 W 179 NE 201 E 241 E Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 53 7a. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Flood Map for Planning (from rivers and the sea) NW N NE W E SE SW S © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 54 7b. Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Map NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 55 7 Flooding 7.1 River and Coastal Zone 2 Flooding Is the site within 250m of an Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 2 floodplain? Yes Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 2 floodplains estimate the annual probability of flooding as between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 100 (1%) from rivers and between 1 in 1000 (0.1%) and 1 in 200 (0.5%) from the sea. Any relevant data is represented on Map 7a – Flood Map for Planning: ID Distance Direction Update Type (m) 1 0 On Site 19-Jun-2017 Zone 2 - (Fluvial /Tidal Models) 2A 132 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 2 - (Fluvial /Tidal Models) 3B 162 N 19-Jun-2017 Zone 2 - (Fluvial /Tidal Models) 4C 181 N 19-Jun-2017 Zone 2 - (Fluvial /Tidal Models) 5D 201 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 2 - (Fluvial /Tidal Models) 7.2 River and Coastal Zone 3 Flooding Is the site within 250m of an Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales Zone 3 floodplain? Yes Zone 3 shows the extent of a river flood with a 1 in 100 (1%) or greater chance of occurring in any year or a sea flood with a 1 in 200 (0.5%) or greater chance of occurring in any year. Any relevant data is represented on Map 7a – Flood Map for Planning. ID Distance Direction Update Type (m) 1 0 On Site 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 2A 79 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 3B 118 N 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 4C 133 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 5D 181 N 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 193 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 203 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 56 219 NE 19-Jun-2017 Zone 3 - (Fluvial Models) 7.3 Risk of Flooding from Rivers and the Sea (RoFRaS) Flood Rating What is the highest risk of flooding onsite? Medium The Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales RoFRaS database provides an indication of river and coastal flood risk at a national level on a 50m grid with the flood rating at the centre of the grid calculated and given above. The data considers the probability that the flood defences will overtop or breach by considering their location, type, condition and standard of protection. RoFRaS data for the study site indicates the property is in an area with a Medium (greater than 1 in 100 but less than 1 in 30) chance of flooding in any given year. Any relevant data within 250m is represented on the RoFRaS Flood map. Data to 50m is reported in the table below. ID Distance Direction RoFRas flood Risk (m) 1 0.0 On Site Low 2 0.0 On Site Low 3 0.0 On Site Medium 4 0.0 On Site Low 5 3.0 W Low 6 13.0 N High 7 16.0 N Medium 8 18.0 N Low 9 28.0 N Low 10 36.0 NW Low 11 38.0 NE Medium 12 43.0 NW Low 13 47.0 NE Low 7.4 Flood Defences Are there any Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? Yes The following flood defence records are represented as lines on the Flood Map: Distanc ID Direction Update e (m) 22 10 N 16-Jun-2017 23 186 NE 16-Jun-2017 7.5 Areas benefiting from Flood Defences Are there any areas benefiting from Flood Defences within 250m of the study site? No Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 57 7.6 Areas benefiting from Flood Storage Are there any areas used for Flood Storage within 250m of the study site? No 7.7 Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Areas 7.7.1 Are there any British Geological Survey groundwater flooding susceptibility areas within 50m of the boundary of the study site? Yes Does this relate to Clearwater Flooding or Superficial Deposits Flooding? Superficial Deposits Flooding Notes: Groundwater flooding may either be associated with shallow unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers which overlie unproductive aquifers (Superficial Deposits Flooding), or with unconfined aquifers (Clearwater Flooding). 7.7.2 What is the highest susceptibility to groundwater flooding in the search area based on the underlying geological conditions? Potential at Surface Where potential for groundwater flooding to occur at surface is indicated, this means that given the geological conditions in the area groundwater flooding hazard should be considered in all land-use planning decisions. It is recommended that other relevant information e.g. records of previous incidence of groundwater flooding, rainfall, property type, and land drainage information be investigated in order to establish relative, but not absolute, risk of groundwater flooding. 7.8 Groundwater Flooding Confidence Areas What is the British Geological Survey confidence rating in this result? High Notes: Groundwater flooding is defined as the emergence of groundwater at the ground surface or the rising of groundwater into man-made ground under conditions where the normal range of groundwater levels is exceeded. The confidence rating is on a threefold scale - Low, Moderate and High. This provides a relative indication of the BGS confidence in the accuracy of the susceptibility result for groundwater flooding. This is based on the amount and precision of the information used in the assessment. In areas with a relatively lower level of confidence the susceptibility result should be treated with more caution. In other areas with higher levels of confidence the susceptibility result can be used with more confidence. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 58 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map NW N NE W E SW S SE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 59 8. Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Presence of Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites within 2000m of the study site? Yes 8.1 Records of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.2 Records of National Nature Reserves (NNR) within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.3 Records of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.4 Records of Special Protection Areas (SPA) within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.5 Records of Ramsar sites within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 60 8.6 Records of Ancient Woodland within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.7 Records of Local Nature Reserves (LNR) within 2000m of the study site: 1 The following Local Nature Reserve (LNR) records provided by Natural England/Natural Resources Wales are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map: Distance ID Direction LNR Name Data Source (m) 1 569 NW Stubbins Park Natural England 8.8 Records of World Heritage Sites within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.9 Records of Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.10 Records of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.11 Records of National Parks (NP) within 2000m of the study site: 1 The following National Park records provided by Natural England/Natural Resources Wales are represented as polygons on the Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map: Distance ID Direction NP Name Data Source (m) 2 516 N Peak District Natural England Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 61 8.12 Records of Nitrate Sensitive Areas within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.13 Records of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones within 2000m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. 8.14 Records of Green Belt land within 2000m of the study site: 1 Green Belt data contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right [2015]. ID Distance Direction Green Belt Name Local Authority Name 3 0 On Site Liverpool, Manchester and West Yorks High Peak District (B) Greenbelt Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 62 9. Natural Hazards Findings 9.1 Detailed BGS GeoSure Data BGS GeoSure Data has been searched to 50m. The data is included in tabular format. If you require further information on geology and ground stability, please obtain a Groundsure Geo Insight, available from our website. The following information has been found: 9.1.1 Shrink Swell What is the maximum Shrink-Swell** hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping: Hazard Ground conditions predominantly low plasticity. No special actions required to avoid problems due to shrink-swell clays. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with shrink-swell clays. 9.1.2 Landslides What is the maximum Landslide* hazard rating identified on the study site? Low The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping: Hazard Possibility of slope instability problems after major changes in ground conditions. Consideration should be given to stability if changes to drainage or excavations take place. Possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential slope stability problems. Existing property no significant increase in insurance risk due to natural slope instability problems. 9.1.3 Soluble Rocks What is the maximum Soluble Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site? Negligible The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping: Hazard Soluble rocks are present, but unlikely to cause problems except under exceptional conditions. No special actions required to avoid problems due to soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks. * This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 63 9.1.4 Compressible Ground What is the maximum Compressible Ground* hazard rating identified on the study site? Moderate The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping: Hazard Significant potential for compressibility problems. Avoid large differential loadings of ground. Do not drain or de-water ground near the property without technical advice. For new build consider possibility of compressible ground in ground investigation, construction and building design. Consider effects of groundwater changes. Extra construction costs are likely. For existing property possible increase in insurance risk from compressibility, especially if water conditions or loading of the ground change significantly. 9.1.5 Collapsible Rocks What is the maximum Collapsible Rocks* hazard rating identified on the study site? Very Low The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping: Hazard Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits. 9.1.6 Running Sand What is the maximum Running Sand** hazard rating identified on the study site? Low The following natural subsidence information provided by the British Geological Survey is not represented on mapping: Hazard Possibility of running sand problems after major changes in ground conditions. Normal maintenance to avoid leakage of water-bearing services or water bodies (ponds, swimming pools) should reduce likelihood of problems due to running sand. For new build consider possibility of running sand into trenches or excavations if water table is high or sandy strata are exposed to water. Avoid concentrated water inputs to site. Unlikely to be an increase in construction costs due to potential for running sand. For existing property no significant increase in insurance risk due to running sand problems is likely. 9.2 Radon 9.2.1 Radon Affected Areas Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are above the Action Level? The property is not in a Radon Affected Area, as less than 1% of properties are above the Action Level. * This indicates an automatically generated 50m buffer and site. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 64 9.2.2 Radon Protection Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? No radon protective measures are necessary. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 65 10. Mining 10.1 Coal Mining Are there any coal mining areas within 75m of the study site? No Database searched and no data found. 10.2 Non-Coal Mining Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 50m of the study site boundary? Yes The following non-coal mining information is provided by the BGS: Distance Direction Name Commodity Assessment of likelihood (m) 0.0 On Site Not available Vein Mineral Sporadic underground mining of restricted extent may have occurred. Potential for difficult ground conditions are unlikely and localised and are at a level where they need not be considered Past underground mine workings are uncommon, localised and of limited area. The rock types present in this area are such that minor mineral veins may be present within them on which it is possible that there have been attempts to work these by underground methods and/or it is possible that small scale underground extraction of other materials may have occurred. All such occurrences are likely to be restricted in size and infrequent. It should be noted, however, that there is always the possibility of the existence of other sub-surface excavations, such as wells, cess pits, follies, air raid shelters/bunkers and other military structures etc. that could affect surface ground stability but which are outside the scope of this dataset. However, if in a coalfield area you should still consider a Coal Authority mining search for the area of interest. 10.3 Brine Affected Areas Are there any brine affected areas within 75m of the study site? No Guidance: No Guidance Required. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 66 Contact Details CENTREMAPS Telephone: 01886 832972 [email protected] Open Space, Upper Interfields, Malvern, Worcester, WR14 1UT British Geological Survey Enquiries Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email: Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries: [email protected] Environment Agency National Customer Contact Centre, PO Box 544 Rotherham, S60 1BY Tel: 03708 506 506 Web: www.environment-agency.gov.uk Email: [email protected] Public Health England Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG www.gov.uk/phe Email:[email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000 The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0345 7626 848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk Ordnance Survey Adanac Drive, Southampton SO16 0AS Tel: 08456 050505 Local Authority Authority: High Peak Borough Council Phone: 0845 129 7777 Web: http://www.highpeak.gov.uk/ Address: Town Hall, Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 6EL Gemapping PLC Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 67 Acknowledgements: Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar Site, Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation data is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data. PointX © Database Right/Copyright, Thomson Directories Limited © Copyright Link Interchange Network Limited © Database Right/Copyright and Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Groundsure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 68 Standard Terms and Conditions Groundsure's Terms and Conditions can be viewed online at this link: https://www.groundsure.com/terms-and-conditions-sept-2016 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817EDR Client Reference: 7904 69 APPENDIX B CENTREMAPS Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Open Space, Upper Interfields, Worcester, WR14 1UT Your Reference: 7904 Report Date 23 Aug 2017 Report Delivery Email - pdf Method: Geo Insight Address: Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ Dear Sir/ Madam, Thank you for placing your order with Groundsure. Please find enclosed the Groundsure Geo Insight as requested. If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our helpline on 01886 832972 quoting the above CENTREMAPS reference number. Yours faithfully, CENTREMAPS Enc. Groundsure Geo Insight Geo Insight Address: Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ Date: 23 Aug 2017 Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client: CENTREMAPS NW N NE W E SW S SE Aerial Photograph Capture date: 28-Sep-2011 Grid Reference: 404181,382129 Site Size: 1.56ha Contents Page Contents Page...... 3 Overview of Findings...... 5 1:10,000 Scale Availability...... 8 Availability of 1:10,000 Scale Geology Mapping...... 9 1 Geology (1:10,000 scale)...... 10 1.1 Artificial Ground Map (1:10,000 scale)...... 10 1. Geology 1:10,000 scale...... 11 1.1 Artificial Ground...... 11 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map (1:10,000 scale)...... 12 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips...... 13 1.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology...... 13 1.2.2 Landslip...... 13 1.3 Bedrock and Faults Map (1:10,000 scale)...... 14 1.3 Bedrock and Faults...... 15 1.3.1 Bedrock/ Solid Geology...... 15 1.3.2 Faults...... 15 2 Geology 1:50,000 Scale...... 16 2.1 Artificial Ground Map...... 16 2. Geology 1:50,000 scale...... 17 2.1 Artificial Ground...... 17 2.1.1 Artificial/ Made Ground ...... 17 2.1.2 Permeability of Artificial Ground...... 17 2.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map (1:50,000 scale)...... 18 2.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips...... 19 2.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology...... 19 2.2.2 Permeability of Superficial Ground ...... 19 2.2.3 Landslip...... 19 2.2.4 Landslip Permeability...... 20 2.3 Bedrock and Faults Map (1:50,000 scale)...... 21 2.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology & Faults...... 22 2.3.1 Bedrock/Solid Geology...... 22 2.3.2 Permeability of Bedrock Ground...... 23 2.3.3 Faults...... 24 3 Radon Data...... 25 3.1 Radon Affected Areas...... 25 3.2 Radon Protection...... 25 4 Ground Workings Map...... 26 4 Ground Workings...... 27 4.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping...... 27 4.2 Historical Underground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping...... 27 4.3 Current Ground Workings...... 28 5 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities...... 30 5.1 Historical Mining...... 30 5.2 Coal Mining...... 30 5.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer...... 30 5.4 Non-Coal Mining...... 31 5.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities...... 31 5.6 Natural Cavities...... 31 5.7 Brine Extraction...... 31 5.8 Gypsum Extraction...... 32 5.9 Tin Mining...... 32 5.10 Clay Mining...... 32 6 Natural Ground Subsidence...... 33 6.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Map...... 33 6.2 Landslides Map...... 34 6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks Map...... 35 6.4 Compressible Deposits Map...... 36 6.5 Collapsible Deposits Map...... 37 6.6 Running Sand Map...... 38 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 3 6 Natural Ground Subsidence...... 39 6.1 Shrink-Swell Clays...... 39 6.2 Landslides...... 39 6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks...... 40 6.4 Compressible Deposits...... 40 6.5 Collapsible Deposits...... 41 6.6 Running Sands...... 41 7 Borehole Records...... 43 8 Estimated Background Soil Chemistry...... 46 9 Railways and Tunnels Map...... 47 9 Railways and Tunnels...... 48 9.1 Tunnels ...... 48 9.2 Historical Railway and Tunnel Features ...... 48 9.3 Historical Railways...... 49 9.4 Active Railways...... 49 9.5 Railway Projects...... 49 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO 7904 4 Overview of Findings The Groundsure Geo Insight provides high quality geo-environmental information that allows geo- environmental professionals and their clients to make informed decisions and be forewarned of potential ground instability problems that may affect the ground investigation, foundation design and possibly remediation options that could lead to possible additional costs. The report is based on the BGS 1:50,000 and 1:10,000 Digital Geological Map of Great Britain, BGS Geosure data; BRITPITS database; Non-coal mining data and Borehole Records, Coal Authority data including brine extraction areas, PBA non-coal mining and natural cavities database, Johnson Poole and Bloomer mining data and Groundsure's unique database including historical surface ground and underground workings. For further details on each dataset, please refer to each individual section in the report as listed. Where the database has been searched a numerical result will be recorded. Where the database has not been searched '-' will be recorded. Section 1: Geology 1:10,000 Scale 1.1 Artificial Ground 1.1 Is there any Artificial Ground/ Made Ground present beneath No the study site at 1:10,000 scale? 1.2 Superficial 1.2.1 Is there any Superficial Ground/Drift Geology present beneath Geology and No Landslips the study site at 1:10,000 scale?* 1.2.2 Are there any records of landslip within 500m of the study site No boundary at 1:10,000 scale? 1.3 Bedrock, Solid 1.3.1 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study Geology and Faults site* see the detailed findings section. 1.3.2 Are there any records of faults within 500m of the study site No boundary at 1:10,000 scale? Section 2: Geology 1:50,000 Scale 2.1 Artificial Ground 2.1.1 Is there any Artificial Ground/ Made Ground present beneath No the study site? 2.1.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of artificial No ground within the study site*boundary? 2.2.1 Is there any Superficial Ground/Drift Geology present beneath 2.2 Superficial Yes Geology and the study site?* Landslips 2.2.2 Are there any records of permeability of superficial ground Yes within 500m of the study site? 2.2.3 Are there any records of landslip within 500m of the study site No boundary? 2.2.4 Are there any records relating to permeability of landslips No within the study site* boundary? Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO 7904 5 Section 2: Geology 1:50,000 Scale 2.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology and Faults 2.3.1 For records of Bedrock and Solid Geology beneath the study site* see the detailed findings section. 2.3.2 Are there any records relating to permeability of bedrock Yes ground within the study site boundary? 2.3.3 Are there any records of faults within 500m of the study site Yes boundary? Section 3: Radon 3. Radon 3.1Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health The property is not in a Radon Affected Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are Area, as less than 1% of properties are above the Action Level? above the Action Level. No radon protective measures are 3.2Radon Protection necessary. Section 4: Ground Workings On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 4.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features from Small Not Not 0 0 11 Scale Mapping Searched Searched 4.2 Historical Underground Workings from Small Scale Mapping 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 Current Ground Workings 0 0 0 0 1 Section 5: Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 5.1 Historical Mining 0 0 0 0 0 5.2 Coal Mining 0 0 1 0 0 5.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer Mining Area 0 0 0 0 0 5.4 Non-Coal Mining* 1 0 0 1 1 5.5 Non–Coal Mining Cavities 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 Natural Cavities 0 0 0 0 0 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 6 Section 5: Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities On-site 0-50m 51-250 251-500 501-1000 5.6 Brine Extraction 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 Gypsum Extraction 0 0 0 0 0 5.8 Tin Mining 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 Clay Mining 0 0 0 0 0 Section 6: Natural Ground Subsidence On-site 6.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Very Low 6.2 Landslides Low 6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks Negligible 6.4 Compressible Deposits Moderate 6.5 Collapsible Deposits Very Low 6.5 Running Sand Low Section 7: Borehole Records On-site 0-50m 51-250 7 BGS Recorded Boreholes 0 3 29 Section 8: Estimated Background Soil Chemistry On-site 0-50m 51-250 8 Records of Background Soil Chemistry 4 1 0 Section 9: Railways and Tunnels On-site 0-50m 51-250 250-500 9.1 Tunnels 0 0 0 Not Searched 9.2 Historical Railway and Tunnel Features 0 0 3 Not Searched 9.3 Historical Railways 0 2 1 Not Searched 9.4 Active Railways 0 0 0 Not Searched 9.5 Railway Projects 0 0 0 0 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 7 1:10,000 Scale Availability NW N NE W E S SW SE 1_10,000 Availability Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 8 Availability of 1:10,000 Scale Geology Mapping The following information represents the availability of the key components of the 1:10,000 scale geological data. Artificial ID Distance Superficial Coverage Bedrock Coverage Mass Movement Coverage Coverage No deposits 1 0.0 No coverage No coverage No coverage are mapped Guidance: The 1:10,000 scale geological interpretation is the most detailed generally available from BGS and is the scale at which most geological surveying is carried out in the field. The database is presented as four types of geology (artificial, mass movement, superficial and bedrock), although not all themes are mapped or available on every map sheet. Therefore a coverage layer showing the availability of the four themes is presented above. The definitions of coverage are as follows: Geology Full Coverage Partial Coverage No Coverage Bedrock The whole tile has been Some but not all the tile has No coverage mapped been mapped Superficial The whole tile has been Some but not all of the tile has No coverage mapped been mapped Artificial Some deposits are mapped on - No deposits are mapped this tile Mass Movement Some deposits are mapped on - No coverage this tile Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 9 1 Geology (1:10,000 scale). 1.1 Artificial Ground Map (1:10,000 scale) NW N NE W E S SW SE Artificial Ground Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 10 1. Geology 1:10,000 scale 1.1 Artificial Ground The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:10,000 scale BGS Geological mapping. Are there any records of Artificial/ Made Ground within 500m of the study site boundary at 1:10,000 scale? No Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 11 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map (1:10,000 scale) NW N NE W E S SW SE Artificial Ground Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 12 1.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:10,000 scale BGS Geological mapping 1.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology Are there any records of Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology within 500m of the study site boundary at 1:10,000 scale? No Database searched and no data found. 1.2.2 Landslip Are there any records of Landslip within 500m of the study site boundary at 1:10,000 scale? No Database searched and no data found. The geology map for the site and surrounding area are extracted from the BGS Digital Geological Map of Great Britain at 1:10,000 scale This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Artificial / Made Ground, Superficial / Drift Geology and Landslips. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 13 1.3 Bedrock and Faults Map (1:10,000 scale) NW N NE W E S SW SE Bedrock and Faults Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 14 1.3 Bedrock and Faults The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:10,000 scale BGS Geological mapping. 1.3.1 Bedrock/ Solid Geology Records of Bedrock/Solid Geology within 500m of the study site boundary at 1:10,000 scale. Database searched and no data found at this scale. 1.3.2 Faults Are there any records of Faults within 500m of the study site boundary at 1:10,000 scale? No Database searched and no data found at this scale. The geology map for the site and surrounding area are extracted from the BGS Digital Geological Map of great Britain at 1:10,000 scale. This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Bedrock/ Solid Geology and linear features such as Faults. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 15 2 Geology 1:50,000 Scale 2.1 Artificial Ground Map NW N NE W E S SW SE Ground Workings Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 16 2. Geology 1:50,000 scale 2.1 Artificial Ground The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:50,000 scale BGS Geological mapping, Sheet No: 099 2.1.1 Artificial/ Made Ground Are there any records of Artificial/ Made Ground within 500m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. 2.1.2 Permeability of Artificial Ground Are there any records relating to permeability of artificial ground within the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 17 2.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips Map (1:50,000 scale) NW N NE W E S SW SE Ground Workings Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 18 2.2 Superficial Deposits and Landslips 2.2.1 Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology Are there any records of Superficial Deposits/ Drift Geology within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes ID Distance Direction LEX Code Description Rock Description 2 0.0 On Site TILLD-DMTN TILL, DEVENSIAN DIAMICTON CLAY, SILT, SAND 3 0.0 On Site ALV-XCZSV ALLUVIUM AND GRAVEL 4 34.0 NE TILLD-DMTN TILL, DEVENSIAN DIAMICTON 5 67.0 W TILLD-DMTN TILL, DEVENSIAN DIAMICTON RIVER TERRACE DEPOSITS 6 328.0 W RTDU-XSV SAND AND GRAVEL (UNDIFFERENTIATE D) CLAY, SILT, SAND 7 340.0 NE ALV-XCZSV ALLUVIUM AND GRAVEL 2.2.2 Permeability of Superficial Ground Are there any records relating to permeability of superficial ground within the study site boundary? Yes Distance (m) Direction Flow Type Maximum Permeability Minimum Permeability 0.0 On Site Mixed High Low 0.0 On Site Intergranular High Very Low 34.0 NE Mixed High Low 2.2.3 Landslip Are there any records of Landslip within 500m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. The geology map for the site and surrounding area are extracted from the BGS Digital Geological Map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale. This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, there are: Artificial/ Made Ground, Superficial/ Drift Geology and Landslips. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nationwide coverage. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 19 2.2.4 Landslip Permeability Are there any records relating to permeability of landslips within the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 20 2.3 Bedrock and Faults Map (1:50,000 scale) NW N NE W E S SW SE Ground Workings Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 21 2.3 Bedrock, Solid Geology & Faults The following geological information represented on the mapping is derived from 1:50,000 scale BGS Geological mapping, Sheet No: 099 2.3.1 Bedrock/Solid Geology Records of Bedrock/Solid Geology within 500m of the study site boundary: ID Distance Direction LEX Code Rock Description Rock Age MILLSTONE GRIT GROUP [SEE ALSO 1 0.0 On Site MG-MDSS MIGR] - MUDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND NAMURIAN SANDSTONE MILLSTONE GRIT GROUP [SEE ALSO 2 0.0 On Site MG-MDSS MIGR] - MUDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND NAMURIAN SANDSTONE 3 124.0 SW ROG-SDST ROACHES GRIT - SANDSTONE NAMURIAN 4 165.0 NW ROG-SDST ROACHES GRIT - SANDSTONE NAMURIAN 5 267.0 E KG-SDST KINDERSCOUT GRIT - SANDSTONE NAMURIAN 6 322.0 S ROG-SDST ROACHES GRIT - SANDSTONE NAMURIAN MILLSTONE GRIT GROUP [SEE ALSO 7 329.0 S MG-MDSS MIGR] - MUDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND NAMURIAN SANDSTONE MILLSTONE GRIT GROUP [SEE ALSO 8 386.0 W MG-MDSS MIGR] - MUDSTONE, SILTSTONE AND NAMURIAN SANDSTONE Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 22 2.3.2 Permeability of Bedrock Ground Are there any records relating to permeability of bedrock ground within the study site boundary? Yes Distanc Direction Flow Type Maximum Permeability Minimum Permeability e 0.0 On Site Fracture Moderate Low Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 23 2.3.3 Faults Are there any records of Faults within 500m of the study site boundary? Yes ID Distance Direction Category Description Feature Description 21 0.0 On Site FAULT Fault, inferred 22 28.0 N FAULT Fault, inferred 23 314.0 W FAULT Fault, inferred 24 322.0 S FAULT Fault, inferred 25 422.0 SW FAULT Fault, inferred 26 422.0 SW FAULT Fault, inferred The geology map for the site and surrounding area are extracted from the BGS Digital Geological Map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale. This Geology shows the main components as discrete layers, these are: Bedrock/Solid Geology and linear features such as Faults. These are all displayed with the BGS Lexicon code for the rock unit and BGS sheet number. Not all of the main geological components have nation wide coverage. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 24 3 Radon Data 3.1 Radon Affected Areas Is the property in a Radon Affected Area as defined by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and if so what percentage of homes are above the Action Level? The property is not in a Radon Affected Area, as less than 1% of properties are above the Action Level. 3.2 Radon Protection Is the property in an area where Radon Protection are required for new properties or extensions to existing ones as described in publication BR211 by the Building Research Establishment? No radon protective measures are necessary. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 25 4 Ground Workings Map NW N NE W E S SW SE Ground Workings Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 26 4 Ground Workings 4.1 Historical Surface Ground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping This dataset is based on Groundsure's unique Historical Land Use Database derived from 1:10,560 and 1:10,000 scale historical mapping Are there any Historical Surface Ground Working Features within 250m of the study site boundary? Yes Distance ID Direction NGR Use Date (m) 404438 1 142.0 E Refuse Heap 1938 382098 403767 2 149.0 S Cuttings 1990 381888 404547 3A 192.0 E Mill Pond 1924 382069 404555 4A 197.0 E Mill Pond 1878 382073 404558 5B 199.0 E Mill Pond 1896 382068 404558 6B 199.0 E Mill Pond 1938 382068 404557 7B 203.0 E Mill Pond 1949 382072 404558 8B 205.0 E Reservoir 1990 382073 404558 9B 205.0 E Reservoir 1975 382073 404285 10C 229.0 NE Reservoir 1990 382416 404285 11C 229.0 NE Reservoir 1975 382416 4.2 Historical Underground Working Features derived from Historical Mapping This data is derived from the Groundsure unique Historical Land Use Database. It contains data derived from 1:10,000 and 1:10,560 historical Ordnance Survey Mapping and includes some natural topographical features (Shake Holes for example) as well as manmade features that may have implications for ground stability. Underground and mining features have been identified from surface features such as shafts. The distance that these extend underground is not shown. Are there any Historical Underground Working Features within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 27 4.3 Current Ground Workings This dataset is derived from the BGS BRITPITS database covering active; inactive mines; quarries; oil wells; gas wells and mineral wharves; and rail deposits throughout the British Isles. Are there any BGS Current Ground Workings within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes The following Current Ground Workings information is provided by British Geological Survey: Distanc Commodity ID Direction NGR Pit Name Type of working Status e (m) Produced A surface mineral working. It may be Not 403660 714.0 NW Sandstone Stubbins termed Quarry, Sand Pit, Clay Pit or Ceased shown 382754 Opencast Coal Site Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 28 5 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Mining, Extraction and © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Natural Cavities Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 29 5 Mining, Extraction & Natural Cavities 5.1 Historical Mining This dataset is derived from Groundsure unique Historical Land-use Database that are indicative of mining or extraction activities. Are there any Historical Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. 5.2 Coal Mining This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within a known coal mining affected area as defined by the coal authority. Are there any Coal Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes The following Coal Mining information provided by the Coal Authority is not represented on Mapping: Distance (m) Direction Details The study site is located within the specified search distance of an identified mining area. Further details 85.0 W concerning this can be obtained from the Coal Authority Helpline on 0845 762 6848. 5.3 Johnson Poole and Bloomer This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within an area where JPB hold information relating to mining. Are there any JPB Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No The following information provided by JPB is not represented on mapping: Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 30 5.4 Non-Coal Mining This dataset provides information as to whether the study site lies within an area which may have been subject to non-coal historic mining. Are there any Non-Coal Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? Yes The following non-coal mining information is provided by the BGS: Distance ID Direction Name Commodity Assessment of likelihood (m) Sporadic underground mining of restricted extent may have occurred. Potential for difficult ground conditions are unlikely 1 0.0 On Site Not available Vein Mineral and localised and are at a level where they need not be considered Localised small scale underground mining may have occurred. 2 267.0 E Not available Vein Mineral Potential for difficult ground conditions are unlikely or localised and are at a level where they need not be considered Localised small scale underground mining may have occurred. Not 724.0 E Not available Vein Mineral Potential for difficult ground conditions are unlikely or localised shown and are at a level where they need not be considered 5.5 Non-Coal Mining Cavities This dataset provides information from the Peter Brett Associates (PBA) mining cavities database (compiled for the national study entitled “Review of mining instability in Great Britain, 1990” PBA has also continued adding to this database) on mineral extraction by mining. Are there any Non-Coal Mining cavities within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. 5.6 Natural Cavities This dataset provides information based on Peter Brett Associates natural cavities database. Are there any Natural Cavities within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. 5.7 Brine Extraction This data provides information from the Coal Authority issued on behalf of the Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board. Are there any Brine Extraction areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 31 5.8 Gypsum Extraction This dataset provides information on Gypsum extraction from British Gypsum records. Are there any Gypsum Extraction areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. 5.9 Tin Mining This dataset provides information on tin mining areas and is derived from tin mining records. This search is based upon postcode information to a sector level.. Are there any Tin Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. 5.10 Clay Mining This dataset provides information on Kaolin and Ball Clay mining from relevant mining records. Are there any Clay Mining areas within 1000m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 32 6 Natural Ground Subsidence 6.1 Shrink-Swell Clay Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Shrink Swell Clay Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 33 6.2 Landslides Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Landslides Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 34 6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Ground Dissolution © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Soluble Rocks Legend Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 35 6.4 Compressible Deposits Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Compressible Deposits Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 36 6.5 Collapsible Deposits Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Collapsible Deposits Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 37 6.6 Running Sand Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Running Sand Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 38 6 Natural Ground Subsidence The National Ground Subsidence rating is obtained through the 6 natural ground stability hazard datasets, which are supplied by the British Geological Survey (BGS). The following GeoSure data represented on the mapping is derived from the BGS Digital Geological map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale. What is the maximum hazard rating of natural subsidence within the study site** boundary? Moderate 6.1 Shrink-Swell Clays The following Shrink Swell information provided by the British Geological Survey: Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Ground conditions predominantly low plasticity. No special actions required to avoid problems due to shrink-swell clays. No special ground 1 0.0 On Site Very Low investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with shrink-swell clays. 6.2 Landslides The following Landslides information provided by the British Geological Survey: Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Possibility of slope instability problems after major changes in ground conditions. Consideration should be given to stability if changes to drainage or excavations take place. 1 0.0 On Site Low Possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential slope stability problems. Existing property - no significant increase in insurance risk due to natural slope instability problems. Possibility of slope instability problems after major changes in ground conditions. Consideration should be given to stability if changes to drainage or excavations take place. 2 0.0 On Site Low Possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential slope stability problems. Existing property - no significant increase in insurance risk due to natural slope instability problems. Slope instability problems are unlikely to be present. No special actions required to avoid problems due to landslides. No special ground 3 0.0 On Site Very Low investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with landslides. * This includes an automatically generated 50m buffer zone around the site Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 39 Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Possibility of slope instability problems after major changes in ground conditions. Consideration should be given to stability if changes to drainage or excavations take place. 4 26.0 W Low Possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential slope stability problems. Existing property - no significant increase in insurance risk due to natural slope instability problems. Possibility of slope instability problems after major changes in ground conditions. Consideration should be given to stability if changes to drainage or excavations take place. 5 47.0 NW Low Possible increase in construction cost to reduce potential slope stability problems. Existing property - no significant increase in insurance risk due to natural slope instability problems. 6.3 Ground Dissolution of Soluble Rocks The following Ground Dissolution information provided by the British Geological Survey: Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) Soluble rocks are present, but unlikely to cause problems except under exceptional conditions. No special actions required to avoid problems due to 1 0.0 On Site Negligible soluble rocks. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with soluble rocks. 6.4 Compressible Deposits The following Compressible Deposits information provided by the British Geological Survey: Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) No indicators for compressible deposits identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible deposits. No special ground investigation 1 0.0 On Site Negligible required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible deposits. Significant potential for compressibility problems. Avoid large differential loadings of ground. Do not drain or de-water ground near the property without technical advice. For new build - consider possibility of compressible ground in ground 2 0.0 On Site Moderate investigation, construction and building design. Consider effects of groundwater changes. Extra construction costs are likely. For existing property - possible increase in insurance risk from compressibility, especially if water conditions or loading of the ground change significantly. No indicators for compressible deposits identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to compressible deposits. No special ground investigation 3 34.0 NE Negligible required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with compressible deposits. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 40 6.5 Collapsible Deposits The following Collapsible Rocks information provided by the British Geological Survey: Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) No indicators for collapsible deposits identified. No actions required to avoid problems due to collapsible deposits. No special ground investigation required, or 1 0.0 On Site Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits. Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be 2 0.0 On Site Very Low present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits. Deposits with potential to collapse when loaded and saturated are unlikely to be 3 34.0 NE Very Low present. No special ground investigation required or increased construction costs or increased financial risk due to potential problems with collapsible deposits. 6.6 Running Sands The following Running Sands information provided by the British Geological Survey: Distance ID Direction Hazard Rating Details (m) No indicators for running sand identified. No special actions required to avoid problems due to running sand. No special ground investigation required, and 1 0.0 On Site Negligible increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand. Very low potential for running sand problems if water table rises or if sandy strata are exposed to water. No special actions required, to avoid problems due to 2 0.0 On Site Very Low running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand. Possibility of running sand problems after major changes in ground conditions. Normal maintenance to avoid leakage of water-bearing services or water bodies (ponds, swimming pools) should reduce likelihood of problems due to running sand. For new build - consider possibility of running sand into trenches or 3 0.0 On Site Low excavations if water table is high or sandy strata are exposed to water. Avoid concentrated water inputs to site. Unlikely to be an increase in construction costs due to potential for running sand. For existing property - no significant increase in insurance risk due to running sand problems is likely. Very low potential for running sand problems if water table rises or if sandy strata are exposed to water. No special actions required, to avoid problems due to 4 34.0 NE Very Low running sand. No special ground investigation required, and increased construction costs or increased financial risks are unlikely due to potential problems with running sand. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 41 7 Borehole Records Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Borehole Records Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 42 7 Borehole Records The systematic analysis of data extracted from the BGS Borehole Records database provides the following information. Records of boreholes within 250m of the study site boundary: 32 Distance ID Direction NGR BGS Reference Drilled Length Borehole Name (m) 404160 BLACK BROOK FLOOD 1 23.0 N SK08SW424 -1.0 382210 ALLEVIATION 6 404080 BLACK BROOK FLOOD 2 28.0 NW SK08SW423 -1.0 382210 ALLEVIATION 5 404080 BLACK BROOK FLOOD 3 42.0 NW SK08SW422 -1.0 382230 ALLEVIATION 4 404250 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 4 94.0 S SK08SW260 4.5 381970 115A 404100 5 142.0 S SK08SW113 5.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 113 381940 404200 6 146.0 S SK08SW116 5.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 116 381920 404140 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 7 152.0 S SK08SW221 8.0 381920 B427 404200 8 176.0 S SK08SW115 14.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 115 381890 404300 9 180.0 S SK08SW126 5.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 180 381890 404100 10 181.0 S SK08SW112 17.5 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 112 381900 403990 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 11 194.0 SW SK08SW182 18.0 381930 B108 404190 12 196.0 S SK08SW114 5.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 114 381870 403970 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 13A 197.0 SW SK08SW178 15.0 381940 B104 404290 14 197.0 S SK08SW117 10.5 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 117 381870 403980 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 15A 199.0 SW SK08SW179 18.0 381930 B105 404480 YARD BOREHOLE FORGE 16 204.0 E SK08SW4 -1.0 382080 MILL 404080 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 17 205.0 S SK08SW220 15.0 381880 B426 404020 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 18 206.0 SW SK08SW183 14.0 381900 B109 404000 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 19B 206.0 SW SK08SW181 15.06 381910 B107 404100 20 210.0 S SK08SW111 5.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 111 381870 403960 21A 211.0 SW SK08SW250 4.25 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 329 381930 403970 22 213.0 SW SK08SW246 15.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 325 381920 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 43 Distance ID Direction NGR BGS Reference Drilled Length Borehole Name (m) 404050 23 214.0 S SK08SW249 4.3 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 328 381880 404190 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 24 216.0 S SK08SW222 15.0 381850 B428 404290 25 217.0 S SK08SW125 5.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 179 381850 403990 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 26B 220.0 SW SK08SW180 24.0 381900 B106 404000 27C 233.0 SW SK08SW247 20.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 326 381880 404020 28 234.0 S SK08SW248 15.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 327 381870 404010 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 29C 238.0 SW SK08SW184 12.0 381870 B110 404000 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 30C 242.0 SW SK08SW219 15.0 381870 B425 403900 31 245.0 SW SK08SW110 5.02 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 103 381940 404390 32 247.0 SE SK08SW118 8.0 CHAPEL EN LE FRITH 118 381850 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 44 The borehole records are available using the hyperlinks below: Please note that if the donor of the borehole record has requested the information be held as commercial-in-confidence, the additional data will be held separately by the BGS and a formal request must be made for its release. #4: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193132 #5: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192982 #6: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192985 #7: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193091 #8: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192984 #9: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192995 #10: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192981 #11: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193051 #12: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192983 #13A: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193047 #14: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192986 #15A: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193048 #16: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192873 #17: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193090 #18: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193052 #19B: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193050 #20: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192980 #21A: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193122 #22: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193118 #23: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193121 #24: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193092 #25: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192994 #26B: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193049 #27C: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193119 #28: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193120 #29C: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193053 #30C: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/193089 #31: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192979 #32: scans.bgs.ac.uk/sobi_scans/boreholes/192987 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 45 8 Estimated Background Soil Chemistry Records of background estimated soil chemistry within 250m of the study site boundary: 5 For further information on how this data is calculated and limitations upon its use, please see the Groundsure Geo Insight User Guide, available on request. Distance (m) Direction Sample Type Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Nickel (Ni) Lead (Pb) 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 90 - 120 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil <15 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg 15 - 30 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg <15 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 0.0 On Site RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg <15 mg/kg <100 mg/kg 34.0 NE RuralSoil 15 - 25 mg/kg <1.8 mg/kg 60 - 90 mg/kg <15 mg/kg <100 mg/kg *As this data is based upon underlying 1:50,000 scale geological information, a 50m buffer has been added to the search radius. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 46 9 Railways and Tunnels Map NW N NE W E SW S SE Railways and Tunnels Legend © Crown copyright and database rights 2017. Ordnance Survey license 100035207. © OpenStreetMapContributors Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 47 9 Railways and Tunnels 9.1 Tunnels This data is derived from OpenStreetMap and provides information on the possible locations of underground railway systems in the UK - the London Underground, the Tyne & Wear Metro and the Glasgow Subway. Have any underground railway lines been identified within the study site boundary? No Have any underground railway lines been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map. This data is derived from Ordnance Survey mapping and provides information on the possible locations of railway tunnels forming part of the UK overground railway network. Have any other railway tunnels been identified within the site boundary? No Have any other railway tunnels been identified within 250m of the site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map. 9.2 Historical Railway and Tunnel Features This data is derived from Groundsure's unique Historical Land-use Database and contains features relating to tunnels, railway tracks or associated works that have been identified from historical Ordnance Survey mapping. Have any historical railway or tunnel features been identified within the study site boundary? No Have any historical railway or tunnel features been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? Yes Distance ID Direction NGR Details Date (m) 404491 1 180 E Tramway Sidings 1898 382092 404468 2 181 E Tramway Sidings 1921 382070 404492 3 187 E Tramway Sidings 1880 382098 Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 48 9.3 Historical Railways This data is derived from OpenStreetMap and provides information on the possible alignments of abandoned or dismantled railway lines in proximity to the study site. Have any historical railway lines been identified within the study site boundary? No Have any historical railway lines been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? Yes Distance (m) Direction Status 5 S Abandoned 6 S Abandoned 96 W Abandoned Multiple sections of the same track may be listed in the detail above Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map. 9.4 Active Railways These datasets are derived from Ordnance Survey mapping and OpenStreetMap and provide information on the possible locations of active railway lines in proximity to the study site. Have any active railway lines been identified within the study site boundary? No Have any active railway lines been identified within 250m of the study site boundary? No Database searched and no data found. Multiple sections of the same track may be listed in the detail above Any records that have been identified are represented on the Railways and Tunnels Map. 9.5 Railway Projects These datasets provide information on the location of large scale railway projects High Speed 2 and Crossrail 1 . Is the study site within 5km of the route of the High Speed 2 rail project? No Is the study site within 500m of the route of the Crossrail 1 rail project? No Further information on proximity to these routes, the project construction status and associated works can be obtained through the purchase of a Groundsure HS2 and Crossrail 1 Report. The route data has been digitised from publicly available maps by Groundsure. The route as provided relates to the Crossrail 1 project only, and does not include any details of the Crossrail 2 project, as final details of the route for Crossrail 2 are still under consultation. Please note that this assessment takes account of both the original Phase 2b proposed route and the amended route proposed in 2016. As the Phase 2b route is still under consultation, Groundsure are providing information on both options until the final route is formally confirmed. Practitioners should take account of this uncertainty when advising clients. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 49 Contact Details CENTREMAPS Telephone: 01886 832972 [email protected] Open Space, Upper Interfields, Malvern, Worcester, WR14 1UT British Geological Survey Enquiries Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel: 0115 936 3143. Fax: 0115 936 3276. Email:[email protected] Web:www.bgs.ac.uk BGS Geological Hazards Reports and general geological enquiries British Gypsum British Gypsum Ltd East Leake Loughborough Leicestershire LE12 6HX The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Mansfield Notts NG18 4RG Tel: 0345 7626 848 DX 716176 Mansfield 5 www.coal.gov.uk Public Health England Public information access office Public Health England, Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health- england Email: [email protected] Main switchboard: 020 7654 8000 Johnson Poole & Bloomer Limited Harris and Pearson Building, Brettel Lane Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 3LH Tel: +44 (0) 1384 262 000 Email:[email protected] Website: www.jpb.co.uk Ordnance Survey Adanac Drive, Southampton SO16 0AS Tel: 08456 050505 Website: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ Getmapping PLC Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Witney, Hampshire RG27 8NW Tel: 01252 845444 Website:http://www1.getmapping.com/ Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 50 Peter Brett Associates Caversham Bridge House Waterman Place Reading Berkshire RG1 8DN Tel: +44 (0)118 950 0761 E-mail:[email protected] Website:http://www.peterbrett.com/home Acknowledgements: Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and/or Database Right. All Rights Reserved. Licence Number [03421028]. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Groundsure Ltd standard Terms and Conditions of business for work of this nature. Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817GEO Client Reference: 7904 51 Standard Terms and Conditions Groundsure's Terms and Conditions can be viewed online at this link: https://www.groundsure.com/terms-and-conditions-sept-2016/ APPENDIX C These Ordnance Survey maps are not printed to scale and have been reduced to A4 size A3 1/10,000 plans are available upon request Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1880 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1898 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1921 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1938 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1968-1971 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1978-1983 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1987-1989 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1988-1990 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1989-1994 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1994-1995 W E % 1:2,500 S &!1:2,500 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1878-1879 W E % 1:10,560 S &!1:10,560 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1896-1897 W E % 1:10,560 S &!1:10,560 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1919-1924 W E % 1:10,560 S &!1:10,560 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1938 W E % 1:10,560 S &!1:10,560 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$County Series N "!1948 W E % 1:10,560 S &!1:10,560 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$Provisional N "!1949 W E % 1:10,560 S &!1:10,560 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1975-1978 W E % 1:10,000 S &!1:10,000 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!1990 W E % 1:10,000 S &!1:10,000 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$1:10,000 Raster N "!2002 W E % 1:10,000 S &!1:10,000 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!2010 W E % 1:10,000 S &!1:10,000 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq Forge Bleach Works, Forge Road, Chinley, SK23 6EJ 7904 CMAPS-CM-649504-7904-230817HIS ! 404181, 382129 "#$National Grid N "!2014 W E % 1:10,000 S &!1:10,000 W12CS5FC D7 X12S4CES1F Y4E89@AE 333`912S4CES1F`52a RS66b8FC D7c 333`5F4A1FaB6Eb8TF`52a 912S4CES1Fd5F4A1FaB6E`52a ) 01234 5267189@A B4C CBABDBEF 189@AE GHIP Q1C4B45F RS1TF7 IHHHUPGHV W12CS5A824 CBAFc 23 August 2017 e2 T8F3 aB6 bF9F4C 5b85f @F1F ghihpq APPENDIX D Key 404250E Approximate Trial Pit Locations 404200E TP1 382200N 382200N Phase 3 Development g=0.18 Boundary g=.25MST bt g=0.2 po. g=0.6 g=0.5 g=0.2 Route of Public g=0.2 po. g=0.2 Footpath bt g=0.30 g=0.2 g=0.15 po. g=0.15 po. Approx line of Electric g=0.3 & Gas services g=.25 po. lp 404250E Existing Trees po. lp lp bin po. po. dk lp g=0.9 TP04 dk trunk 382150N 382150N g=0.2 g=0.2 g=0.2 g=0.2 g=0.25 g=0.7 g=0.35 TP01 TP03 g=0.16 g=0.28 g=0.2 g=0.25 g=0.2 g=0.2 TP10 g=0.25 g=0.2 steps TP10g=.25MST g=.25mst TP02 g=0.4 g=0.4 404200E TP05 TP11 g=0.4 g=0.45 g=.2MS g=0.3 TP12 g=.2MST TP07 g=.15MST 382100N 382100N TP09 g=.3multi Wainhomes g=0.7 g=.3multi TP08 TP06 g=0.25 Forge Road Chinley 404100E g=0.3 g=0.4 g=0.6 g=0.15 g=0.8 Trial Pit Location Plan g=0.2 g=0.25 g=.4multi g=0.3 g=.35multi 0.63dia 404150E g=0.2 g=.2multi g=0.7 404200E CONSULTING ENGINEERS 404250E 382050N 382050N CIVIL STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL 17134/01 APPENDIX E Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP01 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404110.90 - 382154.93 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 181.55 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 2.20 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.10 ES 0.20 181.35 Light brown sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. 0.50 181.05 Stiff grey very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. HVP=78 1 1.10 180.45 Grey slightly clayey very gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse, is subangular to well rounded. Medium cobble content. Large boulder noted at 1.2m depth. 1.80 179.75 Very stiff dark brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse, is angular to subrounded and is of mixed HVP=120 lithologies. 2 2.20 179.35 End of pit at 2.20 m 3 4 5 Remarks: No groundwater encountered. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP02 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404112.96 - 382130.77 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 181.25 01/08/2017 Dimensions 1.9 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 2.10 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.10 ES 0.30 180.94 Firm grey very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. 0.50 D HVP=48 0.70 180.54 Grey clayey gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse, is subangular to well rounded. High cobble and boulder content. 1 1.50 179.74 Stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse, is angular to subrounded and is of mixed lithologies. HVP=85 2 2.10 179.14 End of pit at 2.10 m 3 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 1.1m depth. Stability: Pit Collapse 0.7 - 1.5m depth Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP03 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404135.77 - 382136.53 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 181.02 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2.1 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 1.80 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.30 180.72 Brown slightly silty sandy CLAY. 0.60 180.42 Soft grey silty sandy CLAY. HVP=31 1.00 180.02 1 Brown clayey gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse, is subangular to well rounded. High cobble and boulder content. 1.50 179.52 Stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse, is angular to subrounded and is of mixed lithologies. HVP=90 1.80 179.22 End of pit at 1.80 m 2 3 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 1.1m depth. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP04 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404135.69 - 382167.42 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 180.26 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2.4 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 1.90 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.20 180.06 Dark brown silty CLAY with angular cobbles and boulders of sandstone. (Possible made ground). 0.40 ES 0.80 179.46 Grey clayey gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse, is subangular to well rounded. High cobble and boulder content. 1 1.40 178.86 Orange SAND & GRAVEL. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is angular to subrounded. 1.70 178.56 Stiff brown gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse, is 1.80 D angular to subrounded and is of mixed lithologies. HVP=113 1.90 178.36 End of pit at 1.90 m 2 3 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 1.4m depth. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP05 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: - Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2.3 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 3.00 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Grass onto sandy gravelly CLAY with many cobbles and boulders. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to 0.20 ES coarse, is angular to subrounded. Cobbles & boulders are angular to subrounded. (Possible made ground). 1.00 1 Black silty sandy cobbly CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is angular to subrounded. Cobbles are angular to 1.20 ES rounded. Strong organic smell. (Possible made ground). 1.80 Grey silty clayey sandy GRAVEL. High cobbles and boulder content. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse, is angular to rounded and is of mixed lithologies, 2 Cobbles and boulders are angular to well rounded. (Possible made ground). 3.00 End of pit at 3.00 m 3 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 1.9m depth. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP06 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: - Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 1.60 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike MADE GROUND: Brown silty clay with demolition rubble including brick and pieces of sandstone. 0.50 ES 1.00 1 Grey clayey very gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is very angular to sub rounded and is of mudstone. 1.40 ROCK: Mudstone 1.60 End of pit at 1.60 m 2 3 4 5 Remarks: No groundwater encountered. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP07 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404115.34 - 382107.73 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 182.23 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2.1 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 3.40 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.20 182.03 Firm light brown sandy gravelly CLAY. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse, is angular to rounded and is of mixed lithologies. Medium content of angular cobbles of mixed lithologies. (Possible made ground). HVP=44 1 1.10 181.13 Dark brown silty sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, is angular to subrounded and is of mixed lithologies. (Possible relict topsoil). 1.50 180.73 Soft grey CLAY with partially decomposed rootlets. HVP=37 2 2.10 180.13 Brownish grey clayey silty SAND. Sand is fine to coarse. 3.00 179.23 3 Grey clayey silty very gravelly SAND. with cobbles and boulders. Gravel is fine to coarse, is very angular to subrounded and is of mixed lithologies. 3.40 178.83 End of pit at 3.40 m 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 3.2m depth. Stability: Pit Collapse 0.0m - 3.4m depth. Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP08 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404150.85 - 382084.04 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 182.18 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2.3 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 2.90 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.20 181.98 Light brown very clayey gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium, is angular to rounded and is of mixed lithologies. 0.60 181.58 Firm grey very gravelly cobbly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse, is angular to subrounded. and is of mixed lithologies. 1 HVP=48 1.70 180.48 Firm brown gravelly cobbley CLAY with occasional boulders. Gravel is fine to coarse and is angular to rounded and is mixed lithologies. 2 HVP=55 HVP=57 2.90 179.28 End of pit at 2.90 m 3 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 1.6m depth. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP09 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: 404181.70 - 382100.26 Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 181.46 01/08/2017 Dimensions 2.2 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 2.20 NRBA Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Dark brown sandy silty clayey TOPSOIL with rootlets. 0.20 181.26 Light brown very sandy GRAVEL with high cobble & boulder content. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is angular to rounded. 1 1.60 179.86 Stiff to very stiff brown very gravelly CLAY. HVP=79 2 HVP=120 2.20 179.26 End of pit at 2.20 m 3 4 5 Remarks: Water strike at 1.6m depth. Stability: Stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP10 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: - Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 07/08/2017 Dimensions 2.6 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 2.20 MD Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Grass over TOPSOIL: Dark brown very clayey fine sand with rootlets. 0.20 Dark grey very clayey fine to coarse SAND 1 1.60 Soft dark grey sandy CLAY 1.90 Brown silty SAND & GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to rounded of various lithologies. 2 2.20 End of pit at 2.20 m 3 4 5 Remarks: Groundwater ingress at 1.90m with a moderate flow. Stability: Pit stable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP11 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: - Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 07/08/2017 Dimensions 2.5 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 2.10 MD Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Grass over TOPSOIL: Dark brown very clayey fine sand with rootlets. 0.20 Brown clayey SAND & GRAVEL with a medium to high cobble and boulder content. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to rounded of various lithologies. 1 1.80 Stiff brown sandy CLAY HVP=110 2 2.10 End of pit at 2.10 m 3 4 5 Remarks: Groundwater ingress ta 0.8m with a fast flow. Stability: Pit unstable Trialpit No Trial Pit Log TP12 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Project No. Co-ords: - Date Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Name: 17134 Level: 07/08/2017 Dimensions 2.4 Scale Location: Forge Road, Chinley (m): 1:25 Depth 0.9 Logged Client: Wainhomes (NW) Ltd 1.80 MD Samples and In Situ Testing Depth Level Legend Stratum Description Depth Type Results (m) (m) Water Strike Grass over TOPSOIL: Dark brown very clayey fine sand 0.10 with rootlets. Very soft brown sandy CLAY 0.70 Brown clayey SAND & GRAVEL with a medium to high cobble and boulder content. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded to rounded of various lithologies. 1 1.40 Stiff brown sandy CLAY HVP=120 HVP=98 1.80 End of pit at 1.80 m 2 3 4 5 Remarks: Groundwater ingress at 1.0m with a slow flow Stability: Pit stable APPENDIX F Key Approximate Trial Pit Locations TP1 Phase 3 Development Boundary Approx line of Electric & Gas services TP04 TP01 TP03 TP10 TP02 TP05 TP11 TP12 TP07 Wainhomes TP09 Forge Road TP08 TP06 Chinley Trial Pit Location Plan (Showing Proposed Sketch Layout) CONSULTING ENGINEERS CIVIL STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL 17134/02 APPENDIX G TP04 TP01 TP03 TP10 TP02 TP05 TP11 TP12 TP07 TP09 TP08 TP06 Wainhomes Forge Road Chinley Development Constraints Plan CONSULTING ENGINEERS CIVIL STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL 17134/03 APPENDIX H APPENDIX I CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report FORGE BLEACH WORKS, FORGE ROAD CHINLEY DERBYSHIRE Date of enquiry: 23 August 2017 Date enquiry received: 23 August 2017 Issue date: 23 August 2017 Our reference: 51001603310001 Your reference: 136950348_1| CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report This report is based on, and limited to, the records held by the Coal Authority and the Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board's records, at the time we answer the search. Client name LANDMARK INFORMATION GROUP LIMITED Enquiry address FORGE BLEACH WORKS, FORGE ROAD, CHINLEY, DERBYSHIRE How to contact us 0345 762 6848 (UK) +44 (0)1623 637 000 (International) Approximate position of property 200 Lichfield Lane Reproduced by permission of Mansfield Ordnance Survey on behalf of Nottinghamshire HMSO. © Crown copyright and NG18 4RG database right 2017. All rights reserved. www.groundstability.com Ordnance Survey Licence number: 100020315 /company/the-coal-authority /thecoalauthority /coalauthority © The Coal Authority Page 2 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 Summary Has the search report highlighted evidence or potential of 1 Past underground coal mining No 2 Present underground coal mining No 3 Future underground coal mining No 4 Mine entries No 5 Coal mining geology No 6 Past opencast coal mining No 7 Present opencast coal mining No 8 Future opencast coal mining No 9 Coal mining subsidence No 10 Mine gas No 11 Hazards related to coal mining No 12 Withdrawal of support No 13 Working facilities order No 14 Payments to owners of former copyhold land No 15 Information from the Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board No For detailed findings, please go to page 4. © The Coal Authority Page 3 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 Detailed findings 1. Past underground coal mining The property is not within a surface area that could be affected by past underground mining. 2. Present underground coal mining The property is not within a surface area that could be affected by present underground mining. 3. Future underground coal mining The property is not in an area where the Coal Authority has plans to grant a licence to remove coal using underground methods. The property is not in an area where a licence has been granted to remove or otherwise work coal using underground methods. The property is not in an area likely to be affected from any planned future underground coal mining. No notices have been given, under section 46 of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991, stating that the land is at risk of subsidence. 4. Mine entries There are no known coal mine entries within, or within 20 metres of, the boundary of the property. 5. Coal mining geology The Coal Authority is not aware of any damage due to geological faults or other lines of weakness that have been affected by coal mining. 6. Past opencast coal mining The property is not within the boundary of an opencast site from which coal has been removed by opencast methods. © The Coal Authority Page 4 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 7. Present opencast coal mining The property does not lie within 200 metres of the boundary of an opencast site from which coal is being removed by opencast methods. 8. Future opencast coal mining There are no licence requests outstanding to remove coal by opencast methods within 800 metres of the boundary. The property is not within 800 metres of the boundary of an opencast site for which a licence to remove coal by opencast methods has been granted. 9. Coal mining subsidence The Coal Authority has not received a damage notice or claim for the subject property, or any property within 50 metres, since 31 October 1994. There is no current Stop Notice delaying the start of remedial works or repairs to the property. The Coal Authority is not aware of any request having been made to carry out preventive works before coal is worked under section 33 of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991. 10. Mine gas The Coal Authority has no record of a mine gas emission requiring action. 11. Hazards related to coal mining The property has not been subject to remedial works, by or on behalf of the Authority, under its Emergency Surface Hazard Call Out procedures. 12. Withdrawal of support The property is not in an area where a notice to withdraw support has been given. The property is not in an area where a notice has been given under section 41 of the Coal Industry Act 1994, cancelling the entitlement to withdraw support. 13. Working facilities order The property is not in an area where an order has been made, under the provisions of the Mines (Working Facilities and Support) Acts 1923 and 1966 or any statutory modification or amendment thereof. 14. Payments to owners of former copyhold land The property is not in an area where a relevant notice has been published under the Coal Industry Act 1975/Coal Industry Act 1994. © The Coal Authority Page 5 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 15. Information from the Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board The property lies outside the Cheshire Brine Compensation District. © The Coal Authority Page 6 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 Additional remarks Information provided by the Coal Authority in this report is compiled in response to the Law Society’s Con29M Coal Mining and Brine Subsidence Claim enquiries. The said enquiries are protected by copyright owned by the Law Society of 113 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1PL. Please note that Brine Subsidence Claim enquiries are only relevant for England and Wales. This report is prepared in accordance with the Law Society’s Guidance Notes 2006, the User Guide 2006 and the Coal Authority and Cheshire Brine Board’s Terms and Conditions applicable at the time the report was produced. Disclaimer The Coal Authority owns the copyright in this report and the information used to produce this report is protected by our database rights. All rights are reserved and unauthorised use is prohibited. If we provide a report for you, this does not mean that copyright and any other rights will pass to you. However, you can use the report for your own purposes. Alternative formats If you would like this report in an alternative format, please contact our communications team. © The Coal Authority Page 7 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 Enquiry boundary Key Approximate position of enquiry boundary shown How to contact us Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copyright and 0345 762 6848 (UK) database right 2017. All rights +44 (0)1623 637 000 (International) reserved. 200 Lichfield Lane Ordnance Survey Licence number: 100020315 Mansfield Nottinghamshire NG18 4RG www.groundstability.com /company/the-coal-authority /thecoalauthority /coalauthority © The Coal Authority Page 8 of 8 CON29M Non-Residential Mining Report, reference 51001603310001 APPENDIX J Exova Jones Environmental Registered Address : Exova (UK) Ltd, Lochend Industrial Estate, Newbridge, Midlothian, EH28 8PL Unit 3 Deeside Point Zone 3 Deeside Industrial Park Deeside CH5 2UA Robert E Fry & Associates Ltd 45 Bridgeman Terrace Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780 Wigan Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781 WN1 1TT Attention : Rob Fry Date : 14th August, 2017 Your reference : 17134 Our reference : Test Report 17/13215 Batch 1 Location : Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Date samples received : 4th August, 2017 Status : Final report Issue : 1 Seven samples were received for analysis on 4th August, 2017 of which seven were scheduled for analysis. Please find attached our Test Report which should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced. Interpretations and opinions are outside the scope of any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied. All analysis is carried out on as received samples and reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Compiled By: Bruce Leslie Project Co-ordinator Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced QF-PM 3.1.1 v16 All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 9 Exova Jones Environmental Client Name: Robert E Fry & Associates Ltd Report : Solid Reference: 17134 Location: Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Solids: V=60g VOC jar, J=250g glass jar, T=plastic tub Contact: Rob Fry JE Job No.: 17/13215 J E Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sample ID TP01 TP02 TP04 TP05 TP05 TP06 TP07 Depth 0.20 0.10 0.40 0.20 1.20 0.50 0.90 Please see attached notes for all abbreviations and acronyms COC No / misc Containers J J J J J J J Sample Date 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Method LOD/LOR Units No. Date of Receipt 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 Arsenic # 31.5 34.8 12.8 5.4 6.4 13.6 5.5 <0.5 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Cadmium # 0.9 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.3 <0.1 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Chromium # 79.6 78.7 70.7 42.8 47.4 57.0 56.4 <0.5 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Copper # 58 64 26 38 18 46 24 <1 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Lead # 133 153 122 22 91 101 21 <5 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Mercury # <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Nickel # 31.3 35.4 27.0 44.0 17.4 34.7 44.8 <0.7 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Selenium # 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2 <1 mg/kg TM30/PM15 Zinc # 188 255 95 96 66 166 77 <5 mg/kg TM30/PM15 PAH MS Naphthalene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Acenaphthylene <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Acenaphthene # <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Fluorene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Phenanthrene # 0.04 <0.03 0.04 <0.03 <0.03 0.04 <0.03 <0.03 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Anthracene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Fluoranthene # 0.04 0.08 0.07 <0.03 0.04 0.09 <0.03 <0.03 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Pyrene # 0.04 0.08 0.07 <0.03 <0.03 0.09 <0.03 <0.03 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Benzo(a)anthracene # <0.06 0.12 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 0.08 <0.06 <0.06 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Chrysene # 0.03 0.06 0.04 <0.02 <0.02 0.09 <0.02 <0.02 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Benzo(bk)fluoranthene # <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 0.10 <0.07 <0.07 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Benzo(a)pyrene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 0.06 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Indeno(123cd)pyrene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Benzo(ghi)perylene # <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 mg/kg TM4/PM8 PAH 16 Total <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 <0.6 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.07 <0.05 <0.05 mg/kg TM4/PM8 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 mg/kg TM4/PM8 PAH Surrogate % Recovery 91 85 94 91 89 89 89 <0 % TM4/PM8 TPH CWG Aliphatics >C5-C6 # - - - <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM36/PM12 >C6-C8 # - - - <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM36/PM12 >C8-C10 - - - <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM36/PM12 >C10-C12 # - - - <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >C12-C16 # - - - <4 <4 - <4 <4 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >C16-C21 # - - - <7 <7 - <7 <7 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >C21-C35 # - - - <7 <7 - <7 <7 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >C35-C44 - - - <7 <7 - <7 <7 mg/kg TM5/PM16 Total aliphatics C5-44 - - - <26 <26 - <26 <26 mg/kg TM5/TM36/PM12/PM16 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced QF-PM 3.1.2 v11 All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 2 of 9 Exova Jones Environmental Client Name: Robert E Fry & Associates Ltd Report : Solid Reference: 17134 Location: Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Solids: V=60g VOC jar, J=250g glass jar, T=plastic tub Contact: Rob Fry JE Job No.: 17/13215 J E Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sample ID TP01 TP02 TP04 TP05 TP05 TP06 TP07 Depth 0.20 0.10 0.40 0.20 1.20 0.50 0.90 Please see attached notes for all abbreviations and acronyms COC No / misc Containers J J J J J J J Sample Date 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 01/08/2017 Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Method LOD/LOR Units No. Date of Receipt 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 04/08/2017 TPH CWG Aromatics >C5-EC7 # - - - <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM36/PM12 >EC7-EC8 # - - - <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM36/PM12 >EC8-EC10 # - - - <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg TM36/PM12 >EC10-EC12 # - - - <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >EC12-EC16 # - - - <4 <4 - <4 <4 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >EC16-EC21 # - - - <7 <7 - <7 <7 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >EC21-EC35 # - - - <7 <7 - <7 <7 mg/kg TM5/PM16 >EC35-EC44 - - - <7 <7 - <7 <7 mg/kg TM5/PM16 Total aromatics C5-44 - - - <26 <26 - <26 <26 mg/kg TM5/TM36/PM12/PM16 Total aliphatics and aromatics(C5-44) - - - <52 <52 - <52 <52 mg/kg TM5/TM36/PM12/PM16 MTBE # - - - <5 <5 - <5 <5 ug/kg TM31/PM12 Benzene # - - - <5 <5 - <5 <5 ug/kg TM31/PM12 Toluene # - - - <5 <5 - <5 <5 ug/kg TM31/PM12 Ethylbenzene # - - - <5 <5 - <5 <5 ug/kg TM31/PM12 m/p-Xylene # - - - <5 <5 - <5 <5 ug/kg TM31/PM12 o-Xylene # - - - <5 <5 - <5 <5 ug/kg TM31/PM12 Total Phenols HPLC 0.17 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 mg/kg TM26/PM21 Natural Moisture Content 44.9 98.5 32.2 6.4 16.5 27.3 18.8 <0.1 % PM4/PM0 Moisture Content (% Wet Weight) 31.0 49.6 24.4 6.1 14.2 21.5 15.8 <0.1 % PM4/PM0 Sulphate as SO4 (2:1 Ext) # 0.0147 0.0287 0.0765 0.0557 0.2297 0.0928 0.0088 <0.0015 g/l TM38/PM20 Total Cyanide # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 mg/kg TM89/PM45 Total Organic Carbon # 5.33 7.75 1.96 1.92 1.73 3.12 0.72 <0.02 % TM21/PM24 Sulphide <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 mg/kg TM106/PM119 pH # 5.97 6.41 7.53 5.96 7.38 7.93 6.67 <0.01 pH units TM73/PM11 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced QF-PM 3.1.2 v11 All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 3 of 9 Exova Jones Environmental Asbestos Analysis Client Name: Robert E Fry & Associates Ltd Reference: 17134 Location: Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Contact: Rob Fry Note: Asbestos Screen analysis is carried out in accordance with our documented in-house methods PM042 and TM065 and HSG 248 by Stereo and Polarised Light Microscopy using Dispersion Staining Techniques and is covered by our UKAS accreditation. Detailed Gravimetric Quantification and PCOM Fibre Analysis is carried out in accordance with our documented in-house methods PM042 and TM131 and HSG 248 using Stereo and Polarised Light Microscopy and Phase Contrast Optical Microscopy (PCOM). Samples are retained for not less than 6 months from the date of analysis unless specifically requested. Opinions, including ACM type and Asbestos level, lie outside the scope of our UKAS accreditation. Where the sample is not taken by a Jones Environmental Laboratory consultant, Jones Environmental Laboratory cannot be responsible for inaccurate or unrepresentative sampling. Signed on behalf of Jones Environmental Laboratory: Ryan Butterworth Asbestos Team Leader J E J E Date Of Job Batch Sample ID Depth Sample Analysis Result Analysis No. No. 17/13215 1 TP04 0.40 3 09/08/2017 General Description (Bulk Analysis) soil/stones 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Level Screen NAD 17/13215 1 TP05 0.20 4 09/08/2017 General Description (Bulk Analysis) soil/stones 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Level Screen NAD 17/13215 1 TP05 1.20 5 09/08/2017 General Description (Bulk Analysis) soil/stones 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Level Screen NAD 17/13215 1 TP07 0.90 7 09/08/2017 General Description (Bulk Analysis) soil/stones 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Fibres (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos ACM (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Type (2) NAD 09/08/2017 Asbestos Level Screen NAD QF-PM 3.1.15 v10 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 4 of 9 Exova Jones Environmental Notification of Deviating Samples Client Name: Robert E Fry & Associates Ltd Matrix : Solid Reference: 17134 Location: Phase 3, Forge Road, Chinley Contact: Rob Fry J E J E Sample Job Batch Sample ID Depth Analysis Reason No. No. 17/13215 1 TP05 0.20 4 GRO Solid Samples were received at a temperature above 9°C. 17/13215 1 TP05 1.20 5 GRO Solid Samples were received at a temperature above 9°C. 17/13215 1 TP07 0.90 7 GRO Solid Samples were received at a temperature above 9°C. Please note that only samples that are deviating are mentioned in this report. If no samples are listed it is because none were deviating. Only analyses which are accredited are recorded as deviating if set criteria are not met. QF-PM 3.1.11 v3 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 5 of 9 NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS JE Job No.: 17/13215 SOILS Please note we are only MCERTS accredited (UK soils only) for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our scope of accreditation. Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples that have been identified as being outside our MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations of them will be within our MCERTS scope. If samples are not one of a combination of the above matrices they will not be marked as MCERTS accredited. It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a representative subsample. Stones will generally be included unless we are requested to remove them. All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the contrary. If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company. Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are not, please notify us immediately. All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C unless otherwise stated. Moisture content for CEN Leachate tests are dried at 105°C ±5°C. Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40. Where a CEN 10:1 ZERO Headspace VOC test has been carried out, a 10:1 ratio of water to wet (as received) soil has been used. % Asbestos in Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) is determined by reference to HSG 264 The Survey Guide - Appendix 2 : ACMs in buildings listed in order of ease of fibre release. Negative Neutralization Potential (NP) values are obtained when the volume of NaOH (0.1N) titrated (pH 8.3) is greater than the volume of HCl (1N) to reduce the pH of the sample to 2.0 - 2.5. Any negative NP values are corrected to 0. The calculation of Pyrite content assumes that all oxidisable sulphides present in the sample are pyrite. This may not be the case. The calculation may be an overesitimate when other sulphides such as Barite (Barium Sulphate) are present. WATERS Please note we are not a UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory . ISO17025 accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and usually one other matrix which is analysis specific, any other liquids are outside our scope of accreditation. As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of the water type when submitting samples. Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40. DEVIATING SAMPLES Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be submitted to the laboratory in suitable containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and any test results that may be compromised highlighted on your deviating samples report. SURROGATES Surrogate compounds are added during the preparation process to monitor recovery of analytes. However low recovery in soils is often due to peat, clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable limits for most organic methods are 70 - 130% and for VOCs are 50 - 150%. When surrogate recoveries are outside the performance criteria but the associated AQC passes this is assumed to be due to matrix effect. Results are not surrogate corrected. DILUTIONS A dilution suffix indicates a dilution has been performed and the reported result takes this into account. No further calculation is required. BLANKS Where analytes have been found in the blank, the sample will be treated in accordance with our laboratory procedure for dealing with contaminated blanks. NOTE Data is only reported if the laboratory is confident that the data is a true reflection of the samples analysed. Data is only reported as accredited when all the requirements of our Quality System have been met. In certain circumstances where all the requirements of the Quality System have not been met, for instance if the associated AQC has failed, the reason is fully investigated and documented. The sample data is then evaluated alongside the other quality control checks performed during analysis to determine its suitability. Following this evaluation, provided the sample results have not been effected, the data is reported but accreditation is removed. It is a UKAS requirement for data not reported as accredited to be considered indicative only, but this does not mean the data is not valid. Where possible, and if requested, samples will be re-extracted and a revised report issued with accredited results. Please do not hesitate to contact the laboratory if further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation. Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced QF-PM 3.1.9 v34 All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 6 of 9 JE Job No.: 17/13215 ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED # ISO17025 (UKAS) accredited - UK. SA ISO17025 (SANAS) accredited - South Africa. B Indicates analyte found in associated method blank. DR Dilution required. M MCERTS accredited. NA Not applicable NAD No Asbestos Detected. ND None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs). NDP No Determination Possible SS Calibrated against a single substance SV Surrogate recovery outside performance criteria. This may be due to a matrix effect. W Results expressed on as received basis. + AQC failure, accreditation has been removed from this result, if appropriate, see 'Note' on previous page. ++ Result outside calibration range, results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited. * Analysis subcontracted to a Jones Environmental approved laboratory. AD Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C CO Suspected carry over LOD/LOR Limit of Detection (Limit of Reporting) in line with ISO 17025 and MCERTS ME Matrix Effect NFD No Fibres Detected BS AQC Sample LB Blank Sample N Client Sample TB Trip Blank Sample OC Outside Calibration Range Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced QF-PM 3.1.9 v34 All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 7 of 9 Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix JE Job No: 17/13215 ISO Analysis done Prep Method MCERTS Reported on 17025 on As Received Test Method No. Description No. (if Description (UK soils dry weight (UKAS/S (AR) or Dried appropriate) only) basis ANAS) (AD) Gravimetric measurement of Natural Moisture Content and % Moisture Content at either PM4 PM0 No preparation is required. 35°C or 105°C. Calculation based on ISO 11465 and BS1377. Modified USEPA 8270 method for the solvent extraction and determination of 16 PAHs End over end extraction of solid samples for organic analysis. The solvent mix varies TM4 PM8 AR by GC-MS. depending on analysis required. Yes Modified USEPA 8270 method for the solvent extraction and determination of 16 PAHs End over end extraction of solid samples for organic analysis. The solvent mix varies TM4 PM8 Yes AR by GC-MS. depending on analysis required. Yes Modified USEPA 8015B method for the determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum TM5 PM16 Fractionation into aliphatic and aromatic fractions using a Rapid Trace SPE. AR Hydrocarbons (EPH) with carbon banding within the range C8-C40 GC-FID. Yes Modified USEPA 8015B method for the determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum TM5 PM16 Fractionation into aliphatic and aromatic fractions using a Rapid Trace SPE. Yes AR Hydrocarbons (EPH) with carbon banding within the range C8-C40 GC-FID. Yes TM005: Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) including column fractionation in the carbon range of C10-35 into Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC aliphatic and aromatic fractions by GC-FID. TM5/TM36 PM12/PM16 headspace analysis./Fractionation into aliphatic and aromatic fractions using a Rapid AR TM036: Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in Yes Trace SPE. the carbon chain range of C5-10 by headspace GC-FID. Including determination of BTEX and calculation of Aliphatic fractions. Modified USEPA 415.1. Determination of Total Organic Carbon or Total Carbon by Dried and ground solid samples are washed with hydrochloric acid, then rinsed with TM21 combustion in an Eltra TOC furnace/analyser in the presence of oxygen. The CO2 PM24 Yes AD deionised water to remove the mineral carbon before TOC analysis. Yes generated is quantified using infra-red detection. Determination of phenols by Reversed Phased High Performance Liquid As received solid or water samples are extracted in Methanol: Sodium Hydroxide (0.1M TM26 PM21 AR Chromatography and Electro-Chemical Detection. NaOH) (60:40) by orbital shaker. Yes Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma - Acid digestion of dried and ground solid samples using Aqua Regia refluxed at 112.5 °C. TM30 Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7, 6010B and BS EN ISO PM15 Yes AD Samples containing asbestos are not dried and ground. Yes 11885 2009 Modified USEPA 8015B. Determination of Methyltertbutylether, Benzene, Toluene, Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC TM31 PM12 Yes AR Ethylbenzene and Xylene by headspace GC-FID. headspace analysis. Yes QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 8 of 9 Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix JE Job No: 17/13215 ISO Analysis done Prep Method MCERTS Reported on 17025 on As Received Test Method No. Description No. (if Description (UK soils dry weight (UKAS/S (AR) or Dried appropriate) only) basis ANAS) (AD) Modified US EPA method 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC TM36 PM12 AR the carbon chain range of C4-12 by headspace GC-FID. headspace analysis. Yes Modified US EPA method 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC TM36 PM12 Yes AR the carbon chain range of C4-12 by headspace GC-FID. headspace analysis. Yes Extraction of dried and ground or as received samples with deionised water in a 2:1 Soluble Ion analysis using the Thermo Aquakem Photometric Automatic Analyser. water to solid ratio using a reciprocal shaker for all analytes except hexavalent TM38 PM20 Yes AD Modified US EPA methods 325.2, 375.4, 365.2, 353.1, 354.1 chromium. Extraction of as received sample using 10:1 ratio of 0.2M sodium hydroxide to Yes soil for hexavalent chromium using a reciprocal shaker. Solid samples undergo a thorough visual inspection for asbestos fibres prior to asbestos TM65 Asbestos Bulk Identification method based on HSG 248. PM42 Yes AR identification using TM065. Modified US EPA methods 150.1 and 9045D and BS1377:1990. Determination of pH by TM73 PM11 Extraction of as received solid samples using one part solid to 2.5 parts deionised water. Yes AR Metrohm automated probe analyser. No Modified USEPA method OIA-1667. Determination of cyanide by Flow Injection Analyser. As received solid samples are extracted with 1M NaOH by orbital shaker for Cyanide and TM89 Where WAD cyanides are required a Ligand displacement step is carried out before PM45 Yes AR Thiocyanate analysis. Yes analysis. As received solid samples are extracted with 1M NaOH by orbital shaker for Sulphide TM106 Determination of Sulphide by Skalar Continuous Flow Analyser PM119 AR and Thiocyanate analysis. Yes QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 9 of 9 APPENDIX K REPORT 4043 Contract Number: PSL17/3769 Report Date: 22 August 2017 Client’s Reference: 17103 Client Name: REFA Consulting Engineers 45 Bridgeman Terrace Wigan WN1 1TT For the attention of: Nick Adams Contract Title: Forge Road, Chinley, Phase 3 Date Received: 3/8/2017 Date Commenced: 3/8/2017 Date Completed: 22/8/2017 Notes: Opinions and Interpretations are outside the UKAS Accreditation * Denotes test not included in laboratory scope of accreditation A copy of the Laboratory Schedule of accredited tests as issued by UKAS is attached to this report. This certificate is issued in accordance with the accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be reproduced other than in full, without the prior written approval of the laboratory. Checked and Approved Signatories: R Gunson A Watkins R Berriman (Director) (Director) (Quality Manager) L Knight C Marshall A Fry (Senior Technician) (Laboratory Manager) (Senior Technician) Page 1 of 5 – 7 Hexthorpe Road, Hexthorpe, Doncaster DN4 0AR tel: +44 (0)844 815 6641 fax: +44 (0)844 815 6642 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Hole Sample Sample Top Base Description of Sample Number Number Type Depth Depth m m TP01 0.70 Brown slightly gravelly very sandy CLAY. TP02 0.50 Dark grey slightly sandy CLAY. TP02 2.10 Brown slightly gravelly very sandy CLAY. TP04 1.80 Brown slightly gravelly very sandy CLAY. TP07 1.70 Dark brown slightly gravelly slightly sandy CLAY. TP08 2.50 Brown gravelly very sandy CLAY. TP09 2.00 Brown slightly gravelly very sandy CLAY. Contract No: PSL17/3769 Forge Road, Chinley - Phase 3 Client Ref: 4043 17103 PSL001 Issue 2 Nov 15 Page of . SUMMARY OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS (BS1377 : PART 2 : 1990) Moisture Linear Particle Liquid Plastic Plasticity Passing Hole Sample Sample Top Base Content Shrinkage Density Limit Limit Index .425mm Remarks Number Number Type Depth Depth % % Mg/m3 % % % % m m Clause 3.2 Clause 6.5 Clause 8.2 Clause 4.3/4 Clause 5.3 Clause 5.4 TP01 0.70 22 32 17 15 92 Low plasticity CL. TP02 0.50 31 51 25 26 100 High plasticity CH. TP02 2.10 15 31 14 17 91 Low plasticity CL. TP04 1.80 15 28 12 16 92 Low plasticity CL. TP07 1.70 29 57 27 30 97 High plasticity CH. TP08 2.50 19 32 16 16 90 Low plasticity CL. TP09 2.00 15 30 15 15 92 Low plasticity CL. SYMBOLS : NP : Non Plastic * : Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Wet Sieved. Contract No: PSL17/3769 Forge Road, Chinley - Phase 3 Client Ref: 4043 17103 PSL002 Issue 2 Nov 15 Page of . PLASTICITY CHART FOR CASAGRANDE CLASSIFICATION. (BS5930 :2015) 90 CL CI CH CV CE 80 70 60 50 40 Plasticity Plasticity Index (PI%). 30 20 10 ML MI MH MV ME 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Liquid Limit (LL%). Contract No: PSL17/3769 Forge Road, Chinley - Phase 3 Client Ref: 4043 17103 PSL002 Issue 2 Nov 15 Page of .