'EVER DIFFERENTIATED UNION': PARTICIPATION of THIRD STATES in the COMMON SECURITY and DEFENCE POLICY ERENCAN TEZCAN Msc FREE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'EVER DIFFERENTIATED UNION': PARTICIPATION of THIRD STATES in the COMMON SECURITY and DEFENCE POLICY ERENCAN TEZCAN Msc FREE ‘EVER DIFFERENTIATED UNION’: PARTICIPATION OF THIRD STATES IN THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY ERENCAN TEZCAN MSc FREE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM 2019 i Bursiyer ve Programa Ait Bilgi Formu Adı-Soyadı Erencan Tezcan Sözleşme No. TR2016/DG/04/A1-01/0273 Başvuru Yaptığı Sektör Kamu (Kamu-Üniversite-Özel Sektör) Başvuru Esnasında Bağlı Bulunulan Kurum AB Başkanlığı Başvuru Esnasında Bağlı Bulunulan AB İşleri Uzmanı Kurumdaki Unvan Çalışma Alanı (AB Müktesebat Başlığı) Fasıl 31: Dış, Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası Öğrenim Görülen Ülke Hollanda Öğrenim Görülen Şehir Amsterdam Programın Öğretim Dili İngilizce Üniversite Özgür Amsterdam Üniversitesi Fakülte Sosyal Bilimler Bölüm Siyaset Bilimi Program Adı Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Ulusaşırı Yönetişim Programın Başlangıç/Bitiş Tarihleri (PDS 01/09/2018 – 01/09/2019 belgesindeki tarihler) Öğrenim Süresi (ay) 12 ay “Daha Farklılaşmış Birlik”: Üçüncü Devletlerin Ortak Tez/Araştırma Çalışmasının Başlığı Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikasına Katılımı Danışmanının Adı/Soyadı Dr. Özlem Terzi Danışmanının E-posta Adres/leri [email protected] ii Scholar and Program Information Form Name/Surname Erencan Tezcan Contract No. TR2016/DG/04/A1-01/0273 Sector as of the Application Date Public (Public Sector-University-Private Sector) Institution as of the Application Date Directorate for EU Affairs Title as of the Application Date EU Expert Field of Study (i.e. EU Acquis Chapter) Chapter 31: Foreign, Security and Defence Policy Country of Host Institution The Netherlands City of Host Institution Amsterdam Language of the Programme English Host Institution Vrije University Faculty Social Science Department Political Science International Relations and Transnational Name of the Programme Governance Start/End Dates of the Programme (as in the 01/09/2018 – 01/09/2019 PDS) Duration of the Programme (months) 12 months ‘Ever Differentiated Union’: Participation of Title of the Dissertation/ Research Study Third States in the Common Security and Defence Policy Name of the Advisor Dr. Özlem Terzi E-mail/s of the Advisor [email protected] iii THESIS/RESEARCH REPORT APPROVAL PAGE I have examined the dissertation/research report entitled [‘Ever Differentiated Union’: Participation of Third States in the Common Security and Defence Policy] presented by [Erencan TEZCAN] and hereby certify that it is worthy of acceptance. ../../20.. [Dr. Özlem TERZİ] [Signature] [VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT] iv Table of Contents Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................1 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................2 Özet ..............................................................................................................................3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................5 1. A Part of European Security, But not a Part of CSDP? ...........................................9 1.1. A Brief History of Third States’ in European Security and Legal Possibilities .....9 1.2. Same Question, Different Answers .................................................................... 11 2. Tools in the Box: Differentiation, Externalization and the CSDP ............................. 16 2.1. Historical Evolution and Recent Discussions about Differentiated Integration ... 17 2.2. Differentiated Integration as a Theoretical Frame .............................................. 18 3. Concepts, Method and Sources ................................................................................ 22 3.1. Key Concepts and Operationalizations into Variables........................................ 22 3.2. Process Tracing ................................................................................................. 24 3.3. Data Sources and Case Selection ....................................................................... 26 4. Participation of Non-EU European States in the CSDP ........................................... 28 4.1. Norway and the CSDP ...................................................................................... 28 4.2. Iceland and the CSDP ....................................................................................... 35 4.3. Turkey and the CSDP........................................................................................ 40 4.4. Comparative Analysis of the Cases ................................................................... 47 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 49 Reference List ............................................................................................................. 53 1 Abbreviations CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CSDP Common Security and Defence Policy EDA European Defence Agency EDF European Defence Fund EEA European Economic Area EEC European Economic Community EFTA European Free Trade Area ESDP European Security and Defence Policy EU European Union FPA Framework Participation Agreement ICRU Icelandic Crisis Response Unit NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization PADR Preparatory Action on Defence Research PfP Partnership for Peace PESCO Permanent Structured Cooperation PSC Political and Security Committee UK United Kingdom UNSC United Nations Security Council USA United States of America WEU Western European Union 2 Özet Avrupa Birliği, iç ve dış boyutlarıyla birçok alan ve sektörde “farklılaşmış” bir siyasal varlık olarak kurumsallaşmıştır. Avrupa Birliği’nde yakın dönemde yaşanan siyasal gelişmeler, farklılaşmanın hızını da arttırmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası, iç ve dış farklılaşmanın iyi bir örneğidir. Zira bir üye devlet olan Danimarka politikaya dahil olmamayı tercih ederken, üye olmayan bazı ülkeler güvenlik ve savunma alanındaki bütünleşmenin bazı veçhelerine katılım sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, temel amaç, üçüncü ülkelerin güvenlik ve savunma alanlarındaki bütünleşme sürecine katılımlarını kolaylaştıran ya da engelleyen faktör ve koşulları anlamak ve açıklamaktır. Bu amaçla, farklılaştırılmış bütünleşme kuramının temel varsayımları araştırma sorunsalını çözebilmek için kullanılacaktır. Ayrıca, Norveç, İzlanda ve Türkiye analizi gerçekleştirmek için örnek olarak seçilmiştir. Genel olarak, bu tezde karşılıklı bağımlılık ve siyasallaşmanın, üçüncü ülkelerin güvenlik ve savunma bütünleşmesine katılım düzeylerinin belirlenmesindeki önemlerinin altını çizmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Avrupa Birliği, Farklılaştırılmış Bütünleşme, Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası, Üçüncü Ülkeler, Norveç, İzlanda, Türkiye 3 Abstract Contemporary European integration has been institutionalized as a differentiated political entity with internal and external dimensions. Recent political developments in the European Union have accelerated the pace of differentiation. In this context, the Common Security and Defence Policy is a solid example of external and internal differentiation. For instance, while Denmark as a member opted out from the policy, there are some non- member states which aim to participate in the different aspects of the security and defence integration. In this study, the main aim is to understand and explain the factors and conditions facilitating or impeding third states’ participation in integration in the security and defence field. To this end, the main assumptions of the differentiated integration theory is used to solve the research puzzle. Moreover, Norway, Iceland and Turkey are selected as case studies to conduct the analysis. Overall, this thesis aims to underline the importance of the interplay between interdependence and politicization on defining the level of third states’ participation in the security and defence integration. Keywords: European Union, Differentiated Integration, Common Security and Defence Policy, Third States, Norway, Iceland, Turkey 4 Introduction The European Union (EU) has successfully institutionalized in plenty of fields and sectors, however it is not free from differentiation. On the contrary, today, it is possible to mention multiple varieties of integration. For instance, there are 19 member states which share the common currency, while 9 member states are not in the eurozone. Similarly, most of the member states have agreed for integration in the security and defence field, yet, Denmark decided to remain outside of the integration in this field. Moreover, along with the internal differentiation of integration, there is also an external dimension. Some non-EU states like Norway tend to be part of the integration while not becoming member state. More concretely, Norway implements the 75% of the acquis communautaire without being a member of the Union (Leruth & Lord, 2015, p. 756). Thus, it is fair to admit that contemporary European integration is institutionalized as a highly differentiated political entity with internal and external dimensions. Recent developments in the European integration further increase the degree of differentiation both internally and externally. The most important factor accelerating the trend of differentiation is the Eurozone crisis and the measures taken in order to confront it (Leruth & Lord, 2015, p. 756). The member states sharing the same currency further integrated their fiscal, economic and monetary policies (Leruth & Lord, 2015, p. 756). Moreover, another notable development in this context is the inception of the Permanent
Recommended publications
  • 71877/687532 09/5380- 18.09.2014
    A ROYAL NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND CARE SERVICES EFTA Surveillance Authority Rue Belliard 35 B-1040 Brussel Your ref Our ref Date 71877/687532 09/5380- 18.09.2014 Response from the Norwegian Government to the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s letter of formal notice - legislation on private import of alcohol 1. INTRODUCTION Reference is made to the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s (“the Authority”) letter of formal notice to Norway for maintaining in force certain legislation on private import of alcohol, dated 18 June 2014. The letter was forwarded from the Norwegian Ministry of Finance to the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, which is responsible for the Norwegian legislation on alcohol. By the Authority’s e-mail of 3 July 2014, an extension of the deadline for Norway’s response was granted until 18 September 2014. On behalf of the Norwegian Government (“the Government”), the Ministry of Health and Care Services hereby gives its response to the letter of formal notice. The Government respectfully submits that the Norwegian requirement on functional and structural separation between the undertaking selling the alcoholic beverages and the undertaking delivering the beverages does not violate Article 11 and/or 36 EEA. The Government refers in this regard to its letters of 21 August 2012, 20 December 2012 and 24 January 2014, as well as to its letter of 21 December 2009'. In addition, the Government would like to make the following remarks. 1 Complaint concerning the import an distribution of alcohol in Norway, case 67389/539008. See the remarks on question 4 and 5.___________________________________________________________ Postal address Visiting address Telephone* Departement of Public Our officer POBox 8011 Dep Teatergt, 9 +47 22 24 90 90 Health Hege Christina 0030 Oslo Vat no.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway's Jazz Identity by © 2019 Ashley Hirt MA
    Mountain Sound: Norway’s Jazz Identity By © 2019 Ashley Hirt M.A., University of Idaho, 2011 B.A., Pittsburg State University, 2009 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Musicology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Musicology. __________________________ Chair: Dr. Roberta Freund Schwartz __________________________ Dr. Bryan Haaheim __________________________ Dr. Paul Laird __________________________ Dr. Sherrie Tucker __________________________ Dr. Ketty Wong-Cruz The dissertation committee for Ashley Hirt certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: _____________________________ Chair: Date approved: ii Abstract Jazz musicians in Norway have cultivated a distinctive sound, driven by timbral markers and visual album aesthetics that are associated with the cold mountain valleys and fjords of their home country. This jazz dialect was developed in the decade following the Nazi occupation of Norway, when Norwegians utilized jazz as a subtle tool of resistance to Nazi cultural policies. This dialect was further enriched through the Scandinavian residencies of African American free jazz pioneers Don Cherry, Ornette Coleman, and George Russell, who tutored Norwegian saxophonist Jan Garbarek. Garbarek is credited with codifying the “Nordic sound” in the 1960s and ‘70s through his improvisations on numerous albums released on the ECM label. Throughout this document I will define, describe, and contextualize this sound concept. Today, the Nordic sound is embraced by Norwegian musicians and cultural institutions alike, and has come to form a significant component of modern Norwegian artistic identity. This document explores these dynamics and how they all contribute to a Norwegian jazz scene that continues to grow and flourish, expressing this jazz identity in a world marked by increasing globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • This Fredskorpset-Norway
    VUC LTTC OCE CC WCE Nr. 9 RAPPORT Odd Ragnar Hunnes Norleif Vik STUDENT EXCHANGE FOR DEVELOPMENT Report on a project Authors Odd Ragnar Hunnes and Norleif Vik Publisher Volda University College Year 2010 ISBN 978-82-7661-291-2 (digital version) ISSN 1891-5981 Front page Photo from Wikipedia Commons Print set Author Distribution http://www.hivolda.no/rapport © Author/Volda University College 2010 This material is protected by copyright law. Without explicit authorisation, reproduction is only allowed in so far as it is permitted by law or by agreement with a collecting society. The Report Series includes academic work in progress, as well as finished projects of a high standard. The reports may in some cases form parts of larger projects, or they may consist of educational materials. All published work reports are approved by the dean of the relevant faculty or a professionally competent person as well as the college’s research coordinator. CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................. 5 COORDINATORS AND STUDENTS ..................................................................................... 6 SOME VITAL CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................. 13 PART 1 PRESENTATION ...................................................................................................... 18 1.1 PLANNING ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Peacebuilding As Small State Foreign Policy: Norway's Peace
    Peacebuilding as Small State Foreign Policy: Norway’s Peace Engagement in a Changing International Context Forthcoming in International Studies (2014) Kristian Stokke Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo Abstract This article examines the emergence and transformation of Norway’s peace engagement in the context of changing international relations. Focusing on foreign policy discourses and practices, the article portrays peace engagement as value-based efforts to support resolution of distant intrastate conflicts, and a strategy to promote Norway’s interests and influence in international relations. The article also argues that changing international relations after the turn of the century has challenged and reoriented Norway’s peace engagement in a more realist direction. Foreign policy discourses and practices are increasingly based on a broad notion of interests that also includes ideals of peace, democracy and development. This means that peace engagement can support a domestic political consensus on foreign policy, and simultaneously promote Norway’s standing, relevance and influence in international relations. Peace engagement has thus been institutionalized as a foreign policy that promotes peace while also addressing the challenges associated with smallness in international relations. Keywords: small state, foreign policy, discourse, peace, Norway, Sri Lanka, Burma/Myanmar 1 Introduction Studies of international relations have tended to privilege major actors in world politics, their economic and security interests, and hard power capabilities and strategies. Small states have been given less overall attention and their international strategies are often portrayed as ‘playing it small’ by aligning themselves to major powers in security alliances to overcome their lack of hard power capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Participation of Women in Norway
    Political Participation of Women in Norway -Strong Involvement by both Politicians and the Public- Yukiko Takezawa ノルウェーの女性による政治参加 -政治家、民衆による参画- 竹 澤 由記子 Abstract It is often said that in Nordic countries gender equality has been achieved to a great extent than in other countries. In Norway, gender equality especially in a political sphere is highly achieved and more women have been successful as politicians than other industrialized nations. In the latest national election of 2009, 42 percent of all the candidates were female, and half of the ministers in the current Cabinet are women. This paper firstly points out the statistics showing of women's participation in politics from the past to the latest elections, and then it will point out both historical and political backgrounds which led Norwegian women highly involved in politics. Key words : Norway, political participation, gender equality law (Received October 1, 2010) 抄 録 北欧諸国における民衆の政治参加率は比較的高いといわれているが、その中でもノル ウェーの女性による政治参加は先進国の中でも特に目覚しいものがある。2009 年の国政 選挙においては、女性の議員立候補者は全体の 42 パーセントを占め、現在の閣僚も半数 が女性である。このようなノルウェーの政治分野における女性の進出の背景には何がある のか。本稿では、過去から最近の選挙における女性の投票率、立候補率など、ノルウェー の女性の政治進出の高さを表す統計を示したうえで、その背景にある歴史的、政治的要因 について考察する。 キーワード:ノルウェー、女性による政治参画、男女機会均等法 (2010 年 10 月 1 日受理) − 103 − 大阪女学院短期大学紀要40号(2010) 1. Introduction It is clear that the level of women's participation in the political arena is still low in most industrialized nations. It is historically true that women have been excluded from full and equal citizenship compared to men, and challenging arguments over women's status both in public and private venues still continue. Regarding women's status in democracy theory, even today after the introduction of universal suffrage, there are still ongoing arguments from feminists who claim that women have never been and still are not admitted as full and equal members in any country known as a‘ democracy', even though there are, as liberal democrats claims, the formal (or legal) equal civic status of women, as Carol Pateman (1989) states as below.
    [Show full text]
  • Stein Kuhnle Professor of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Status: February 2011
    June 25, 2021 Curriculum Vitae Stein Kuhnle Professor of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Status: February 2011 PERSONAL DATA Birth: Bergen, Norway, 22 November 1947. Citizenship: Norwegian. Private address: Boenesskogen 205, N-5154 Boenes, Norway Mobile phone: +47 92492279 Email address: [email protected] EDUCATION Cand. polit. Degree in Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway, 1973. Dissertation: "Social Mobilization and Political Participation: The Nordic Countries c. 1850-1970". ACADEMIC POSITIONS Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen (August 1982 – November 2017); Emeritus Professor, University of Bergen (December 2017 – lifetime); Professor of Comparative Social Policy, Hertie School, The University of Governance, Berlin (Jan. 2006 – Dec.2013); Emeritus Professor, Hertie School, The University of Governance, Berlin (January 2014- lifetime); Adjunct Professor, Stein Rokkan Centre, Bergen (January 2002 - December 2005) ; Adjunct Professor, Centre for Social Research, Bergen (May 1999 - December 2001); Research Director, Program on Welfare State Research, Norwegian Research Council for Applied Social Sciences (January 1988 - December 1994) ; Professor, Gastprofessur "Westeuropa", University of Mannheim (March - August 1987); Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Bergen (January 1979 - July 1982); University Fellow, University of Bergen (January 1976-December 1978); Research Assistant, University of Bergen (1972-1975) VISITING FELLOWSHIPS Visiting Professor, Soka University, Tokyo, 1
    [Show full text]
  • ENTERTAINMENT and RESPONSIBILITY a Search for a Normative Ethics of Responsibility for the Media Industry
    MASTER‘S THESIS International Business and Politics ENTERTAINMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY A search for a normative Ethics of Responsibility for the media industry Arnar Narfi Vidarsson Under the supervision of Gitte Meyer journalist, ph.d 80 Pages 181,222 Characters 1. June COPENHAGEN BUSINESS SCHOOL 2016 Abstract: Even with the new wave of Corporate Social Responsibility the social aspect of it in some sense seems lacking. Normative ethics have fallen to the side in modern times and this has meant that an ethics of responsibility has not been explored for a while and thus has been undervalued. The aim of this paper is to seek a normative ethics of responsibility. This research paper looks at responsibility and the entertainment industry through a case on the TV series “Okkupert” (Occupied). The paper builds a framework of power and discourse through which it considers the power held by entertainment media and the power it wields through the creation and perpetuation of discourse and why understanding this is important. The paper then lays out the reason why there is an ethics of responsibility. It does so through the ethics of Hans Jonas and the field of CSR. The paper tries to offer a solution for how to bring ethical responsibility into the organization namely by rethinking corporate reporting and including intellectual capital. The paper ends with a perspectivation on the applicability of the concept for other issues within entertainment media and deals with the possible pitfalls of applying the concept too widely and straying into censorship rather than self-critique and reflection on the dominant cultural discourse and the power it wields over how society understands and perceives reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Sound: Norway's Jazz Identity by © 2019 Ashley Hirt M.A., University of Idaho, 2011 B.A., Pittsburg State University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KU ScholarWorks Mountain Sound: Norway’s Jazz Identity By © 2019 Ashley Hirt M.A., University of Idaho, 2011 B.A., Pittsburg State University, 2009 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Musicology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Musicology. __________________________ Chair: Dr. Roberta Freund Schwartz __________________________ Dr. Bryan Haaheim __________________________ Dr. Paul Laird __________________________ Dr. Sherrie Tucker __________________________ Dr. Ketty Wong-Cruz The dissertation committee for Ashley Hirt certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: _____________________________ Chair: Date approved: ii Abstract Jazz musicians in Norway have cultivated a distinctive sound, driven by timbral markers and visual album aesthetics that are associated with the cold mountain valleys and fjords of their home country. This jazz dialect was developed in the decade following the Nazi occupation of Norway, when Norwegians utilized jazz as a subtle tool of resistance to Nazi cultural policies. This dialect was further enriched through the Scandinavian residencies of African American free jazz pioneers Don Cherry, Ornette Coleman, and George Russell, who tutored Norwegian saxophonist Jan Garbarek. Garbarek is credited with codifying the “Nordic sound” in the 1960s and ‘70s through his improvisations on numerous albums released on the ECM label. Throughout this document I will define, describe, and contextualize this sound concept. Today, the Nordic sound is embraced by Norwegian musicians and cultural institutions alike, and has come to form a significant component of modern Norwegian artistic identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine Effah Mensah
    The Norwegian Petroleum Experience: A Model for Ghana? i The Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, is the international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB). Eight departments, associated research institutions and the Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine in Oslo. Established in 1986, Noragric’s contribution to international development lies in the interface between research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments. The Noragric Master thesis are the final thesis submitted by students in order to fulfil the requirements under the Noragric Master programme “International Environmental Studies”, “Development Studies” and other Master programmes. The findings in this thesis do not necessarily reflect the views of Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation contact Noragric. © Mensah Augustine Effah, December 2012 [email protected] Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway Tel.: +47 64 96 52 00 Fax: +47 64 96 52 01 Internet: http://www.umb.no/noragric ii Declaration I, Mensah Augustine Effah, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigations and findings. Sources of information other than my own have been acknowledged and a reference list has been appended. This work has not been previously submitted to any other university for award of any type of academic degree. Signature……………………………….. Date………………………………………… iii Dedications To Maame, Dr. Charles Obeng Mensah, Elizabeth Foriwaah and Lydia Gyaasewaah (My Siblings). My late Dad and Brother, Robert Kwaku Mensah and Tony Takyi Mensah respectively also deserve to be mentioned and may their souls rest in perfect peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Name:Overview of Wine and Beer Sales by Vinmonopolet in 2020
    Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: January 20,2021 Report Number: NO2021-0002 Report Name: Overview of Wine and Beer Sales by Vinmonopolet in 2020 Country: Norway Post: The Hague Report Category: Product Brief, Wine, Beverages Prepared By: Marjolein Selten Approved By: Christopher Riker Report Highlights: This report contains a brief analysis of the Norwegian wine monopoly’s (Vinmonopolet’s) sales of wine and beer in calendar year 2020. From January until November 2020, U.S. exports of wine and beer to Norway totaled $13.7 million, 25.2 percent higher than during the same period in 2019. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Overview: Norway’s wine monopoly (known as Vinmonopolet) has exclusive rights to sell beer (with an alcohol content of 4.7 percent or higher), wine, and spirits to the Norwegian consumer, and is a wholly-owned state corporation subject to the oversight of the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Vinmonopolet has 335 stores across the country, and estimates its market share at roughly 90 percent in 2020 (30 percent higher than in 2019). Figure 1. Vinmonopolet Stores in Norway Source: Vinmonopolet There is no direct trade between Vinmonopolet and producers of wine, beer, and sprits in Norway. All of its 27,000 products are purchased from (and sourced by) roughly 500 approved Norwegian importers.1 Vinmonopolet’s stores are divided into six categories based on their anticipated sales volume. Annual sales range from one million liters in its largest stores to less than 35,000 liters in its smaller stores.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 | Sami Responses to Poverty in the Nordic Countries CHRISTIAN JAKOB BURMEISTER HICKS an D ÁNDE SOMBY
    15 | Sami responses to poverty in the Nordic countries CHRISTIAN JAKOB BURMEISTER HICKS AN D ÁNDE SOMBY The Sami are the indigenous people of Fenno-Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden and Finland) and the Kola Peninsula (north-western Russia). This chapter deals exclusively with the Sami of Fenno-Scandinavia owing to the contrast- ing economic conditions of the Fenno-Scandinavian Sami and those of the Kola Peninsula. The Fenno-Scandinavian or ‘Nordic’ Sami live in highly developed social welfare systems with governments that allow for greater autonomy than the Russian government. The Kola Sami do not share the same benefits as other Sami, owing to the limited political and economic control they have in Russia. The control that the Russian central govern- ment and the global markets hold over the Kola Sami makes it difficult for significant economic improvement even today. There are also differences in the political and social situations of the Finnish, Swedish and Norwegian Sami. For instance, although the Finnish Sami do not have nearly such expansive rights as the Norwegian Sami, they did establish the first Sami parliament ten years before the Norwegian Sami and twenty before the Swedish Sami. The Finnish Sami also receive many of the same political privileges as the Norwegian Sami. Yet in Finland the Sami argue that there are no Sami-specific laws to secure them additional rights through their indigenous status.1 In Norway, there are language laws that do allow the Sami greater latitude to teach their own language. In Sweden, on the other hand, Sami are far more disadvantaged legally than either of their eastern or western neighbours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homemade Nobel Peace Prize Why the European Union Is This
    1 The Homemade Nobel Peace Prize 2 3 4 Why the European Union is This Year’s 5 6 7 Winner 8 9 Pieter de Wilde 10 11 12 13 14 After many previous nominations, the European Union (EU) has finally been 15 awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee cited the EU’s 16 contribution to peace between France and Germany and its influence on suc- 17 cessful democratization in Southern, Central and Eastern Europe as the reason 18 behind the decision. Yet, none of these events took place in 2012. Even if we 19 credit the EU with these achievements, the award seems slightly awkward at a 20 time when so many EU citizens are suffering under the harsh austerity meas- 21 ures intended to save the Eurozone. Taking into consideration the EU’s long- 22 term achievements and the current Eurozone predicament leads me to ask: Why 23 now? 24 25 To answer this question, we need to understand the domestic politics of Norway. 26 Norway is not a member of the EU. It has applied for membership twice, in the 27 early 1970s and the early 1990s. Referendums on membership in 1972 and 28 1994 were close, and the population was deeply divided on the issue. Both times, 29 votes against membership held a narrow majority, but the issue remained on 30 the political agenda. Ever since the first referendum in 1972, EU membership 31 has continuously been a bone of contention in Norway. Couples divorce, siblings 32 stop talking to each other and flying an EU flag in public easily invites verbal, if 33 not physical abuse.
    [Show full text]