Trends in Russia-China Relations Implications for India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trends in Russia-China Relations Implications for India Trends in Russia-China Relations Implications for India NANDAN UNNIKRISHNAN UMA PURUSHOTHAMAN OBSERVER RESEARCH FOUNDATION First published in 2015 ISBN: 81-8681-811-1 by: Observer Research Foundation 20, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 002, INDIA Ph. : +91-11-43520020, 30220020 Fax : +91-11-43520003, 23210773 E-mail: [email protected] Printed and bound by: Vinset Advertising, Delhi Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors. The publication may be reproduced for academic or non-commercial purposes only. Prior permission of the copyright holder should be obtained for reproduction in any form for commercial purposes. © Observer Research Foundation, 2015 All rights reserved Trends in Russia-China Relations Implications for India NANDAN UNNIKRISHNAN UMA PURUSHOTHAMAN OBSERVER RESEARCH FOUNDATION About the Authors Nandan Unnikrishnan is Vice President and Senior Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. At ORF, he looks after the Eurasia Studies Programme. An alumnus of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), he began his career as a journalist with the Press Trust of India (PTI). From 1985 to 1987, he was deputed by PTI to the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). In 1995, after 15 years in PTI culminating with a three-year posting to Moscow as the Bureau Chief, he moved to Business India's Television Channel – TVI – as the News Coordinator for International Affairs. He rose to head the channel in 1998. During his tenure at ORF, Nandan has participated in several national and international conferences and lectured in academic and specialised institutions. Dr. Uma Purushothaman is a Research Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. Previously, she worked as a Research Associate at the United Service Institution of India. She has published numerous works concerning India, the United States, Russia, China, and Iran for a variety of domestic and international academic sources and has presented papers at many conferences, including in China and Belgium. Her current research interest is Great Powers in Asia. She received her Masters and PhD from the Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Contents Preface iii I. Introduction 1 II. Russia-China Relations: A Brief History 5 III. Views on Global Governance 9 IV. Sino-Russia Engagement at Multilateral Forums 13 V. Economic and Trade Relations 21 VI. Energy Ties 31 VII. Military Cooperation 49 VIII. Cultural Ties 57 IX. Afghanistan 59 X. Central Asia 61 XI. The Arctic 65 XII. Climate Change 67 XIII. The Russian Far East and China 69 XIV. Russian and Chinese Military Postures 87 XV. The Role of External Players 91 XVI. Conclusion 95 XVII. Implications for India 99 Endnotes 105 Bibliography 117 Acknowledgements This monograph is the culmination of a year-long study conducted in 2012, by the Observer Research Foundation, with support and inputs from many quarters. We would like to thank the many scholars from China and Russia we met during our field trips—Dr. Dmitri Trenin from Carnegie, Moscow; Dr. Alexander Lukin and Dr. Ivan Safranchuk from the Russian Diplomatic Academy; Prof. Yuri Dubinin from Moscow State University; Prof. Su Hao and Dr. Gao Fei from the China Foreign Affairs University; Dr. Yang Cheng from the East China Normal University; and Dr. Natalia Ryzhova from the Far East Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. We would also like to thank Mr. Nalin Surie, former Ambassador, and Prof. Rajesh Rajagopalan from JNU, for their valuable inputs. We owe a debt of gratitude to Mr. Ajay Bisaria for the time he spent with us explaining India's policy concerns. We would also like to thank our colleagues at ORF: Mr. Samir Saran, Dr. C Raja Mohan, and Dr. Manoj Joshi, for their comments on earlier drafts. Thanks are also due to Ms. Sadhavi Chauhan for data collection and Ms. Anushya Ramaswamy for her contribution to the section on Sino-Russian cooperation in multilateral fora. We would particularly like to thank the administrative staff at ORF for logistics support for our field trips and conferences. Errors and shortcomings, if any, are entirely ours. Nandan Unnikrishnan Uma Purushothaman ORF | Trends in Russia-China Relations: Implications for India i Preface n a rapidly-changing world where new powers and fresh alliances are emerging, Russia-China relations will form a key component in determining the evolution Iof the balance of power in the world. There is increasing convergence between Russia and China on several global issues. Moscow and Beijing openly coordinate positions on these issues, particularly in the UN Security Council. They are also engaged in multilateral fora such as RIC, SCO, and BRICS, and see such an engagement as one way of strengthening a multipolar world in which they are key players as well as a platform to present an alternative viewpoint to the Western-dominated global discourse. At the same time, the so-called “China threat” plays an important role in Russia's foreign and defence policies. Russia actively develops its Eastern Military District, supplying it with new weapons and troops, and holds military exercises every year to practice the redeployment of troops to the Russian Far East from the European part of Russia. Similarly, the counterpart “Russia threat” plays a role in China's foreign and defence policies: the Chinese military conducts exercises simulating an invasion of Russia with its troops marching 1,000 kilometres to test the army's long-range projection capacity. Russia knows that despite its superiority in terms of nuclear weapons, its conventional forces are no match to China's military. China, on the other hand, fears being encircled and isolated if Russia joins the West. Moscow and Beijing realise that the political systems in both countries are transitional in nature although similar in terms of systems governed by self-perpetuating elites. Therefore, there is always the possibility that both countries may change, thus transforming the nature of a China/Russia threat: from what is currently hypothetical to a real one. This would have terrible potential consequences for both countries. ORF | Trends in Russia-China Relations: Implications for India iii It is to avoid the possibility of such a confrontation that the leaders of both countries are trying to bind their nations together through a web of military, economic, energy, and social ties. Beijing and Moscow have been re-invigorating their military cooperation through arms sales (China acquired $2 billion worth of Russian arms between 2011 and 2012) as well as through regular joint military exercises (bilateral as well as multilateral) and exchange of experts. For example, during Chinese President Xi Jinping's recent visit to Russia, it was widely reported in the Chinese media that Russia had agreed to sell China some 24 Su-35 multirole fighter jets and four Amur-class diesel submarines. This is a higher level of technology than supplied before, indicating a change in Russia's attitude towards transfer of technology to China, given Moscow's fears of it being reverse engineered. Economic relations are portrayed as the “new strategic basis” for Sino-Russian relations. China is Russia's biggest trading partner and the largest Asian investor in Russia. China sees Russia as a powerhouse of raw material and a growing market for its consumer goods. While Russia exports natural resources, China supplies manufactured goods. This imbalance in the structure of trade is beginning to worry Russia. Russia's long-term economic relationship with China also faces an existential conundrum. Russia needs financial resources and technology to restructure and modernise its economy to reduce its dependence on raw materials exports. However, the technologies it requires for this are available not with China, but in the West. Sino-Russian energy relations have fallen short of their potential so far. The most important hurdles to greater energy cooperation in the decade 2000 to 2010, were Russia's fear of a Chinese monopsony (fears of being dependent on one consumer of energy) as well as price disputes. Now the strategic reluctance on Russia's part to sell energy to China is diminishing with the demand for Russian energy in Europe declining and the US likely to become a net exporter of gas and oil to Europe. In the meantime, China has been trying to diversify its energy sources in Central Asia, West Asia and Africa, while also exploring the option of shale gas. Therefore, while iv Preface | www.orfonline.org Russia could become dependent on China as a market, it seems highly unlikely that China will become dependent on Russia for energy. Thus, Russia's fears of a Chinese energy monopsony may yet materialise. Russia and China have similar interests and priorities in Central Asia. Nevertheless, China's increasing inroads into the region make Russia uncomfortable and could become a source of tension. So far, China appears to be sensitive to Russian concerns. In 2010, China and Russia issued a joint statement in which China acknowledged the post-Soviet region as an area of Russia's special interests and expressed support for Russia's endeavours to uphold its national interests and security in Central Asia. Another area of tension could be China's recently espoused interest in the Arctic. However, even here, Beijing and Moscow have begun collaborating with each other. Cooperation in the Russian Far East has the potential to be a game-changer in Sino- Russian relations if they are able to move towards joint development of the region. While Moscow realises the need to develop the Far East and integrate it with the Asia Pacific region, it faces a bigger dilemma: who should its partner/s be in developing the Far East? Should it be Japan? Or South Korea? Perhaps, China? Or all of them together? The answer to this question would point towards whom Russia would lean to, in the years ahead.
Recommended publications
  • Prepared by Textore, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020
    AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES CAPABILITIES AND DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA Prepared by TextOre, Inc. Peter Wood, David Yang, and Roger Cliff November 2020 Printed in the United States of America by the China Aerospace Studies Institute ISBN 9798574996270 To request additional copies, please direct inquiries to Director, China Aerospace Studies Institute, Air University, 55 Lemay Plaza, Montgomery, AL 36112 All photos licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, or under the Fair Use Doctrine under Section 107 of the Copyright Act for nonprofit educational and noncommercial use. All other graphics created by or for China Aerospace Studies Institute Cover art is "J-10 fighter jet takes off for patrol mission," China Military Online 9 October 2018. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2018-10/09/content_9305984_3.htm E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.airuniversity.af.mil/CASI https://twitter.com/CASI_Research @CASI_Research https://www.facebook.com/CASI.Research.Org https://www.linkedin.com/company/11049011 Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, Intellectual Property, Patents, Patent Related Matters, Trademarks and Copyrights; this work is the property of the U.S. Government. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights Reproduction and printing is subject to the Copyright Act of 1976 and applicable treaties of the United States. This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This publication is provided for noncommercial use only.
    [Show full text]
  • 77 a Feature of the Russian Society in Its Current State Is the Crisis of Identity
    euroPOLIS vol. 7, no. 1/2013 THE REGIONAL IDENTITY OF THE SIBERIAN COMMUNITY: Major formation factors and reconstruction problems Vyacheslav V. Shevtsov Tomsk State University Abstract The article considers conditions, factors and mechanisms of regional Siberian identity formation in the historical past and in the modern conditions of poliethnic and multiconfessional Russia. The Siberian identity is presented by hierarchy of identities: regional and territorial (territories and areas), national and territorial (autonomous republics and areas), ethnic, religious and professional ones. The level of the Siberian identity is proportional to the level of resource, technological, historical and cultural self-sufficiency of the Siberian society. Today the Siberian identity is realized mainly at the level of separate territories and national and territorial formations as well. At the same time, the strengthening of the confessional and ethnocultural identity role, expressed in the growth of the number of religious, national and cultural associations and autonomies, became a new phenomenon. Keywords: Siberia, identity, Russia, community. Introduction In the last decade of the XX century, marked by mondialisation and the transformations of the political map of Europe, a surge in scientific interest towards problems of regional identity and the emergence of the theories of «neo - a regionalism» (Keating 1998) are evident. On the other side of the Atlantic these problems are briskly discussed in Quebec, where both academics and the public compare the quest for identity at home and in Europe (Palard & all 2006; Therien & all. 2004). In 2000, in Montreal, a congress gathering leading economists, political scientists, sociologists, anthropologists and ministers of the federal government debated on the topic of «Mondialisation and national identity».
    [Show full text]
  • POLÍTICAS DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA NAS REGIÕES DE FRONTEIRA DA CHINA, RÚSSIA E ÍNDIA Ministério Da Justiça E Cidadania Secretaria Nacional De Segurança Pública
    POLÍTICAS DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA NAS REGIÕES DE FRONTEIRA DA CHINA, RÚSSIA E ÍNDIA Ministério da Justiça e Cidadania Secretaria Nacional de Segurança Pública POLÍTICAS DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA NAS REGIÕES DE FRONTEIRADE FRONTEIRA DOS ESTADOS DA UNIDOSCHINA, E MÉXICO RÚSSIA E ÍNDIA Estratégia Nacional de Segurança Pública nas Fronteiras (ENAFRON) Estratégia Nacional de Segurança Pública nas Fronteiras (ENAFRON) Organização: Alex Jorge das Neves, Gustavo de Souza Rocha e José Camilo da Silva MJ BrasíliaBrasília-DF – DF 2016 Presidente da República Interino Michel Temer Ministro da Justiça e Cidadania Alexandre de Moraes Secretário Executivo José Levi Mello do Amaral Júnior Secretária Nacional de Segurança Pública Regina Maria Filomena De Luca Diretor do Departamento de Políticas, Programas e Projetos Rodrigo Oliveira de Faria Diretor do Departamento de Pesquisa, Análise da Informação e Desenvolvimento de Pessoal em Segurança Pública Rogério Bernardes Carneiro Diretor-adjunto do Departamento de Políticas, Programas e Projetos Anael Aymore Jacob Coordenador-Geral de Planejamento Estratégico em Segurança Pública, Programas e Projetos Especiais Alex Jorge das Neves Coordenador-Geral de Pesquisa e Análise da Informação Gustavo Camilo Baptista Diretora Nacional do Projeto Segurança Cidadã PNUD BRA/04/029 Beatriz Cruz da Silva Coordenadora Nacional do Projeto Segurança Cidadã PNUD BRA/04/029 Ângela Cristina Rodrigues Ministério da Justiça e Cidadania Secretaria Nacional de Segurança Pública POLÍTICAS DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA NAS REGIÕES DE FRONTEIRADE FRONTEIRA DOS ESTADOS DA UNIDOSCHINA, E MÉXICO RÚSSIA E ÍNDIA Estratégia Nacional de Segurança Pública nas Fronteiras (ENAFRON) Estratégia Nacional de Segurança Pública nas Fronteiras (ENAFRON) Organização: Alex Jorge das Neves, Gustavo de Souza Rocha e José Camilo da Silva MJ BrasíliaBrasília-DF – DF 2016 2016@ Secretaria Nacional de Segurança Pública Todos os direitos reservados.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Reporting -- Volume C2
    WEATHER REPORTING MESSAGES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES МЕТЕОРОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ INFORMES METEOROLOGICOS VOLUME/TOM/VOLUMEN C2 TRANSMISSION PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES DE TRANSMISSION ЛPOГPAMMЬI ЛEPEДY PROGRAMAS DE TRANSMISIÓN 2012 Weather y Climate y Water World Meteorological Organization Organisation météorologique mondiale Всемирная Метеорологическая Организация Organización Meteorológica Mundial WMO/OMM/BMO No. 9 WEATHER REPORTING MESSAGES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES МЕТЕОРОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ INFORMES METEOROLOGICOS VOLUME/TOM/VOLUMEN C2 TRANSMISSION PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES DE TRANSMISSION ЛPOГPAMMЬI ЛEPEДY PROGRAMAS DE TRANSMISIÓN 2012 Edition World Meteorological Organization Organisation météorologique mondiale Всемирная Метеорологическая Организация Organización Meteorológica Mundial WMO/OMM/BMO No. 9 COPYRIGHT © World Meteorological Organization © Organisation météorologique mondiale The right of publication in print, electronic and any other L’OMM se réserve le droit de publication en version imprimée form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts ou électronique ou sous toute autre forme et dans n’importe from WMO publications may be reproduced without quelle langue. De courts extraits des publications de l’OMM authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly peuvent être reproduits sans autorisation, pour autant que la indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, source complète soit clairement indiquée. La correspondance reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole relative au contenu rédactionnel
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Availability: IBM Ethernet B-Type (M/S/R- Series) and J-Type (M/E-Series) Products Now Available in Selected Countries
    IBM Europe, Middle East, and Africa Hardware Announcement ZG10-0118, dated April 6, 2010 Revised availability: IBM Ethernet b-type (m/s/r- series) and j-type (m/e-series) products now available in selected countries Table of contents 1 Overview 2 Description 1 Planned availability date 5 Announcement countries Overview The following IBM® Ethernet b-type and j-type products are now approved for connecting to the public telecommunication networks in additional countries and the availability of these products is now being revised to list those approved countries. • IBM Ethernet Router j-type m-series (4274-M02, M06, and M11) • IBM Ethernet Switch j-type e-series (4274-E08 and 4274-E16) • IBM Ethernet Router b-type m-series (4003-M04, M08, M16, and M32) • IBM Ethernet Switch b-type s-series (4003-S08 and 4003-S16) • IBM Ethernet Switch b-type r-series (4003-R04, R08, and R16) The previously announced availability of these products has changed. Refer to the following Hardware Announcements for complete information on these products: • ZG09-0845, dated October 20, 2009 • ZG09-0811, dated October 20, 2009 • ZG09-0217, dated April 28, 2009 • ZG09-0218, dated April 28, 2009 • ZG09-0629, dated August 25, 2009 • ZG09-0810, dated October 20, 2009 For more information, refer to the Description section. Planned availability date April 6, 2010 • Only in the following countries for the IBM Ethernet Switch J08E (4274-E08) and IBM Ethernet Switch J16E (4274-E16) Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Bermuda, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Saint
    [Show full text]
  • 586 World Political
    22_Biz_in_Global_Econ MAPS 12/14/04 2:56 PM Page 586 WORLD POLITICAL MAP ARCTIC OCEAN Barrow GREENLAND Fort Yukon Port Radium Fairbanks ICELAND Nome Baker Lake Nuuk Reykjavik Rankin Inlet Torshavn Anchorage Cordova Fort Chipewyan Churchill Juneau Inukjuak Fort McMurray Bear Lake Dawson Creek Thompson Grande Prairie Flin Flon Su Prince Rupert Prince George Unalaska Prince Albert Dublin Labrador City U. K. Red Deer IRELAND Londo Saskatoon CANADA Kamloops Calgary Cork Moosonee Swift Current Vancouver Brandon Timmins Amos Williston Spokane Grand Forks Seattle Nantes Butte Duluth Ottawa Montreal Minneapolis Portland Bayonne Twin Falls MilWawkee Detroit Scottsbluff Chicago Buffalo Boston Valladolid Porto Omaha Madrid Provo New York Reno Denver Kansas City Baltimore PORTUGAL Philadelphia SPAIN Oakland U. S. A. St. Louis Washington D. C. Ponta Delgada Lisbon Sevilla San Francisco Norfolk Gibraltar Las Vegas Albuquerque Memphis Charlotte Rabat Los Angeles Atlanta Casablanca Tucson Dallas Birmingham San Diego ATLANTIC MOROCCO Houston New Orleans Jacksonville Canary Islands ALG Tampa WESTERN THE BAHAMAS MEXICO SAHARA Havana Mexico City CUBA DOM. REP. MAURITANIA Araouan JAMAICA Nouakchott BELIZE HAITI MALI HONDURAS SENEGAL Dakar GUATEMALA GAMBIA Bamako EL SALVADOR NICARAGUA BURKIN Caracas GUINEA BISSAU GUINEA Conakry GHANA IVORY T COSTA RICA Freetown VENEZUELA Georgetown COAST PACIFIC PANAMA Paramaribo SIERRA LEONE Bogota GUYANA Monrovia FRENCH GUIANA A SURINAME LIBERIA Abidjan COLOMBIA EQU SAO TOM ECUADOR Quito Belem Manaus Fortaleza Talara PERU
    [Show full text]
  • GDP Composition %
    Macau Introduction Key Economic Facts U.S. Embassy Macau, along with Hong Kong, is one of the two special Income Level (by per capita High Income U.S. Consulate General Hong Kong & Macau administrative regions of China in Eastern Asia. It lies on the GNI): 26 Garden Road western side of the Pearl River Delta, bordering Guangdong GDP, PPP (current international $82.91 billion (2019) Central, Hong Kong and facing the South China Sea. Macau is $): Phone: (852) 2523-9011 situated 60 kilometers (37 mi) southwest GDP growth (annual %): -4.71% (2019) https://hk.usconsulate.gov of Hong Kong and consists of the Macau GDP per capita, PPP (current $129,451.06 (2019) Peninsula and the islands of Taipa and international $): Coloane. The government system is a Manufacturing, value added (% 0.54% (2018) limited democracy; the chief of state is the president of of GDP): China, and the head of government is the chief executive. Current account balance (BoP, $17.70 billion (2019) Under the "one country, two systems" approach, China's current US$): socialist economic system is not Inflation, consumer prices 3.01% (2018) practiced in Macau. Macau has (annual %): a market based, service- Labor force, total: 390,040 (2020) oriented economy in which the Unemployment, total (% of 2.51% (2020) prices of goods and services total labor force) (modeled ILO estimate): are determined in a free price Imports of goods and services $18.01 billion (2019) system. (current US$): Exports of goods and services $44.97 billion (2019) Location: Eastern Asia (current US$): Capital
    [Show full text]
  • Location Indicators by Indicator
    ECCAIRS 4.2.6 Data Definition Standard Location Indicators by indicator The ECCAIRS 4 location indicators are based on ICAO's ADREP 2000 taxonomy. They have been organised at two hierarchical levels. 12 January 2006 Page 1 of 251 ECCAIRS 4 Location Indicators by Indicator Data Definition Standard OAAD OAAD : Amdar 1001 Afghanistan OAAK OAAK : Andkhoi 1002 Afghanistan OAAS OAAS : Asmar 1003 Afghanistan OABG OABG : Baghlan 1004 Afghanistan OABR OABR : Bamar 1005 Afghanistan OABN OABN : Bamyan 1006 Afghanistan OABK OABK : Bandkamalkhan 1007 Afghanistan OABD OABD : Behsood 1008 Afghanistan OABT OABT : Bost 1009 Afghanistan OACC OACC : Chakhcharan 1010 Afghanistan OACB OACB : Charburjak 1011 Afghanistan OADF OADF : Darra-I-Soof 1012 Afghanistan OADZ OADZ : Darwaz 1013 Afghanistan OADD OADD : Dawlatabad 1014 Afghanistan OAOO OAOO : Deshoo 1015 Afghanistan OADV OADV : Devar 1016 Afghanistan OARM OARM : Dilaram 1017 Afghanistan OAEM OAEM : Eshkashem 1018 Afghanistan OAFZ OAFZ : Faizabad 1019 Afghanistan OAFR OAFR : Farah 1020 Afghanistan OAGD OAGD : Gader 1021 Afghanistan OAGZ OAGZ : Gardez 1022 Afghanistan OAGS OAGS : Gasar 1023 Afghanistan OAGA OAGA : Ghaziabad 1024 Afghanistan OAGN OAGN : Ghazni 1025 Afghanistan OAGM OAGM : Ghelmeen 1026 Afghanistan OAGL OAGL : Gulistan 1027 Afghanistan OAHJ OAHJ : Hajigak 1028 Afghanistan OAHE OAHE : Hazrat eman 1029 Afghanistan OAHR OAHR : Herat 1030 Afghanistan OAEQ OAEQ : Islam qala 1031 Afghanistan OAJS OAJS : Jabul saraj 1032 Afghanistan OAJL OAJL : Jalalabad 1033 Afghanistan OAJW OAJW : Jawand 1034
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics Or Geoeconomics?
    China-Russia Relations: One Year Later: Geopolitics or Geoeconomics? by Yu Bin Associate Professor, Wittenberg University Two one-year anniversaries – the Russia-China friendship treaty and the Sept. 11 attacks – were very much in the minds of Russian and Chinese leaders during the third quarter of 2002. Both China and Russia publicly expressed satisfaction with the historic treaty that “legalizes” bilateral interactions. Beyond that, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Bismarckian diplomatic dexterity seemed to make Russia not only an eagerly sought member of the major power club, but also to position it in a crucial point between the West and the so-called “axis of evil” states (Iraq, Iran, and North Korea). Meanwhile, Beijing’s strategic and diplomatic constraints were somewhat alleviated by the country’s sustained economic growth. Between China and Russia, the much alluded to friendship treaty appeared only to offer another round of strategic maneuvering and mutual adjustment at the dawn of a new U.S. military doctrine of preemption that would displace deterrence. Premiers’ Tough Talk: Profit First, Friendship Second The quarter began with Russian Security Council Secretary Vladimir Rushailo’s visit to China on July 15-20 to celebrate the one-year anniversary of the friendship treaty. Rushailo met with almost all top Chinese leaders (President Jiang Zemin, Vice Premier Qian Qichen, Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan, Defense Minister Chi Haotian, acting State Security Minister Gen Huichang, and Public Security Minister Jia Chunwang). The seventh regular prime ministers’ meeting between Zhu Rongji and Mikhail Kasyanov in Shanghai on Aug. 21-23 was the most substantial high-level interaction for the third quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Dartmouth Conf Program
    The Dartmouth Conference: The First 50 Years 1960—2010 Reminiscing on the Dartmouth Conference by Yevgeny Primakov T THE PEAK OF THE COLD WAR, and facilitating conditions conducive to A the Dartmouth Conference was one of economic interaction. the few diversions from the spirit of hostility The significance of the Dartmouth Confer- available to Soviet and American intellectuals, ence relates to the fact that throughout the who were keen, and able, to explore peace- cold war, no formal Soviet-American contact making initiatives. In fact, the Dartmouth had been consistently maintained, and that participants reported to huge gap was bridged by Moscow and Washington these meetings. on the progress of their The composition of discussion and, from participants was a pri- time to time, were even mary factor in the success instructed to “test the of those meetings, and it water” regarding ideas took some time before the put forward by their gov- negotiating teams were ernments. The Dartmouth shaped the right way. At meetings were also used first, in the early 1970s, to unfetter actions under- the teams had been led taken by the two countries by professionally quali- from a propagandist connotation and present fied citizens. From the Soviet Union, political them in a more genuine perspective. But the experts and researchers working for the Insti- crucial mission for these meetings was to tute of World Economy and International establish areas of concurring interests and to Relations and the Institute of U.S. and Cana- attempt to outline mutually acceptable solutions dian Studies, organizations closely linked to to the most acute problems: nuclear weapons Soviet policymaking circles, played key roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Destination Tourism in Greater Tumen Region
    MULTI-DESTINATION TOURISM IN GREATER TUMEN REGION RESEARCH REPORT 2013 MULTI-DESTINATION TOURISM IN GREATER TUMEN REGION RESEARCH REPORT 2013 Greater Tumen Initiative Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH GTI Secretariat Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia (RCI) Tayuan Diplomatic Compound 1-1-142 Tayuan Diplomatic Office Bldg 1-14-1 No. 1 Xindong Lu, Chaoyang District No. 14 Liangmahe Nanlu, Chaoyang District Beijing, 100600, China Beijing, 100600, China www.tumenprogramme.org www.economicreform.cn Tel: +86-10-6532-5543 Tel: + 86-10-8532-5394 Fax: +86-10-6532-6465 Fax: +86-10-8532-5774 [email protected] [email protected] © 2013 by Greater Tumen Initiative The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) or members of its Consultative Commission and Tourism Board or the governments they represent. GTI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, GTI does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. “Multi-Destination Tourism in the Greater Tumen Region” is the report on respective research within the GTI Multi-Destination Tourism Project funded by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. The report was prepared by Mr. James MacGregor, sustainable tourism consultant (ecoplan.net).
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Hong Kong and Macao Under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
    Pace International Law Review Volume 16 Issue 2 Fall 2004 Article 3 September 2004 The Status of Hong Kong and Macao under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods Ulrich G. Schroeter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Ulrich G. Schroeter, The Status of Hong Kong and Macao under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 16 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 307 (2004) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol16/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STATUS OF HONG KONG AND MACAO UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS Ulrich G. Schroeter* I. Introduction ....................................... 308 II. Significance of the Status as a "Contracting State" Under the UN Sales Convention .................. 309 III. The Case of Hong Kong and Macao ............... 312 A. Historical Background ......................... 312 1. Subsequent Development with Respect to H ong Kong ................................. 313 2. Subsequent Development with Respect to M acao ..................................... 314 B. The Position According to the Two SARs Legal O rder .......................................... 314 C. Are Hong Kong and Macao "Contracting States" According to Articles 89-101 of the C ISG ? ......... ................................ 317 1. Hong Kong and Macao as Parts of the People's Republic of China, a Contracting State ....................................... 318 2. Impact of the Public International Law Rules on Succession of States .............
    [Show full text]