DOCSLIB.ORG

Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Politics of Anti-Communism at Columbia University: Anti-Intellectualism and the Cold War During the General's Columbia Presidency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Politics of Anti-Communism at Columbia University: Anti-Intellectualism and the Cold War During the General's Columbia Presidency University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-19-2017 Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Politics of Anti-Communism at Columbia University: Anti-Intellectualism and the Cold War during the General's Columbia Presidency Dylan S. Cannatella University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Intellectual History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Cannatella, Dylan S., "Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Politics of Anti-Communism at Columbia University: Anti-Intellectualism and the Cold War during the General's Columbia Presidency" (2017). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2302. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2302 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Politics of Anti-Communism at Columbia University: Anti- Intellectualism and the Cold War during the General's Columbia Presidency (1948-1952) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by Dylan S. Cannatella BA, University of New Orleans, 2013 May 2017 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible if not for the incredible assistance I received from the faculty at the University of New Orleans. First of all, I would like to thank the chair of my thesis committee, Dr. Günter Bischof, whose expert insights into the Cold War and the life of Dwight D. Eisenhower have been invaluable to me in the process of writing this paper. I would also like to thank the other members of my committee, Dr. Allan Millet and Dr. Connie Atkinson, whose suggestions helped me improve my argument as well as structure my paper. I must also thank Dr. James Mokhiber and Dr. Andrea Mosterman for providing me with general mentorship throughout the entire graduate school process. Similarly, I must thank Dr. Catherine Candy for always believing in my capabilities as a scholar because without her glowing recommendation I might never have received the assistantship that allowed me the opportunity to better myself through post-graduate education. Of course, I also a owe a great deal of gratitude to my parents and my maternal grandparents who have always nurtured a passion in me for the life of the mind, and for history in particular, and have always supported me in my endeavors. Finally, I would like to thank my girlfriend, Meagan, for always providing emotional support for me throughout the stresses of graduate school life and for taking a sincere interest in all the work I have done over the past two years. ii Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Background and Historiography ..........................................................................................6 Anti-Intellectualism and the Construction of Americanism ..............................................12 Eisenhower’s Early Life, Education and Career in the Military ........................................20 Eisenhower’s Ideology and Cold War Discourse ..............................................................25 Anti-Intellectualism in Eisenhower’s Columbia Presidency .............................................26 Anti-Intellectualism in the Context of Ike’s Political Career ............................................53 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................56 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................60 Vita .....................................................................................................................................63 iii Abstract Dwight D. Eisenhower has been criticized as an anti-intellectual by scholars such as Richard Hofstadter. Eisenhower’s tenure as president of Columbia University was one segment of his career he was particularly criticized for because of his non-traditional approach to education there. This paper examines Eisenhower’s time at Columbia to explain how anti- intellectualism played into his university administration. It explains how his personality and general outlook came to clash with the intellectual environment of Columbia especially in the wake of the faculty revolt against former Columbia President Nicholas Murray Butler. It argues that Eisenhower utilized the Columbia institution to promote a Cold War educational agenda, which often belittled Columbia intellectuals and their scholarly pursuits. However, this paper also counter-argues that Eisenhower, despite accusations of anti-intellectualism, was an academically interested man who never engaged in true suppression of free thought despite pressure from McCarthyite influences in American government, media and business. Keywords: Dwight D. Eisenhower; Richard Hofstadter; Columbia University; Anti- Intellectualism; Anti-Communism; McCarthyism iv Introduction A scholar at Columbia University once told the new University President Dwight D. Eisenhower that “we have some of the most exceptional physicists, mathematicians, chemists and engineers.” In response, Eisenhower asked if they were also “exceptional Americans?” Confused, the scholar attempted to explain that they were excellent researchers but Eisenhower abruptly cut him off—“Dammit, what good are exceptional physicists…exceptional anything unless they are exceptional Americans.”1 This statement reveals one of the General’s personal and public attitudes he expressed at times throughout his career and was especially notable during his tenure at Columbia. Eisenhower’s critical and suspicious attitude towards intellectuals is characteristic of an ideological phenomenon known as anti-intellectualism. Colleen Shogan views anti-intellectualism, in the broad sense, as some form of fundamental opposition towards the acquiring of knowledge through the intellectual mediums of reason, contemplation and critical thought. The anti-intellectual, instead, prefers to acquire understanding through instincts, intuition, innate sense of character and moral sensibilities.2 Richard Hofstadter defines anti- intellectualism as a general “resentment and suspicion of the life of the mind and those who are considered to represent it; and a disposition constantly to minimize the value of that life.”3 Thus, the anti-intellectual phenomenon is often expressed, both individually and institutionally, as disdain and distrust for intellectuals and intellectual activities and a pragmatic approach to problem solving. It is reflected through various spectrums of the societal milieu including politics, education, business, religion and the military. 1 Stephen Ambrose, Eisenhower: Soldier, General of the Army, President-Elect (1890-1952) (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983), 469. 2 Colleen Shogan, “Anti-Intellectualism in the Modern Presidency: A Republican Populism," Perspectives on Politics 5, no.2 (2007): 297-298, doi: 10.1017/S153759270707079X. 3 Richard Hofstadter, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963), 7. 1 When initially offered the presidency of Columbia by University Trustee and IBM CEO Tom Watson in 1946, Eisenhower replied that he was not the man for the job. He insisted that Watson and the other Columbia trustees would prefer his brother Milton, who was much more suitable for the position as a career academic and the current president of Kansas State University.4 However, Watson and the other trustees wanted the General in particular because it was believed that his household name could help in fundraising.5 Despite Eisenhower’s initial disinterest, Watson eventually persuaded him to accept the position on the grounds that he could fulfill his duty in helping to mold the upcoming generation of American youth through a leadership role at such a prestigious institution as Columbia. However, Eisenhower dictated terms that he would have no involvement in purely academic affairs, no excessive social duties and would not be burdened by tedious administrative details. Instead, Eisenhower intended to devote his energies to “providing internal leadership on broad and liberal lines and promote basic concepts of education in a democracy.”6 These terms were deemed acceptable by Watson and the other trustees and so Eisenhower succeeded long time Columbia President Nicholas Murray Butler as thirteenth president of Columbia University.7 Eisenhower’s Columbia administration was unconventional in that it was not focused on the intellectual aspects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City
    Phys. perspect. 5 (2003) 87–121 © Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, 2003 1422–6944/05/010087–35 The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City Benjamin Bederson* I discuss the contributions of physicists who have lived and worked in New York City within the context of the high schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions with which they were and are associated. I close with a walking tour of major sites of interest in Manhattan. Key words: Thomas A. Edison; Nikola Tesla; Michael I. Pupin; Hall of Fame for GreatAmericans;AlbertEinstein;OttoStern;HenryGoldman;J.RobertOppenheimer; Richard P. Feynman; Julian Schwinger; Isidor I. Rabi; Bronx High School of Science; StuyvesantHighSchool;TownsendHarrisHighSchool;NewYorkAcademyofSciences; Andrei Sakharov; Fordham University; Victor F. Hess; Cooper Union; Peter Cooper; City University of New York; City College; Brooklyn College; Melba Phillips; Hunter College; Rosalyn Yalow; Queens College; Lehman College; New York University; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences; Samuel F.B. Morse; John W. Draper; Columbia University; Polytechnic University; Manhattan Project; American Museum of Natural History; Rockefeller University; New York Public Library. Introduction When I was approached by the editors of Physics in Perspecti6e to prepare an article on New York City for The Physical Tourist section, I was happy to do so. I have been a New Yorker all my life, except for short-term stays elsewhere on sabbatical leaves and other visits. My professional life developed in New York, and I married and raised my family in New York and its environs. Accordingly, writing such an article seemed a natural thing to do. About halfway through its preparation, however, the attack on the World Trade Center took place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paranoid Style in American History of Science *
    The Paranoid Style in American History of Science * George REISCH Received: 31.5.2012 Final version: 30.7.2012 BIBLID [0495-4548 (2012) 27: 75; pp. 323-342] ABSTRACT: Historian Richard Hofstadter’s observations about American cold-war politics are used to contextualize Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and argue that substantive claims about the nature of sci- entific knowledge and scientific change found in Structure were adopted from this cold-war political cul- ture. Keywords: Thomas S. Kuhn; The Structure of Scientific Revolutions ; Richard Hofstadter; “The Paranoid Style in American Politics;” Cold War; James B. Conant; Brainwashing. RESUMEN: Las observaciones del historiador Richard Hofstadter sobre la política americana en la Guerra Fría se uti- lizan para contextualizar La estructura de las revoluciones científicas de Thomas Kuhn y sostener que algunas afirmaciones fundamentales sobre la naturaleza del conocimiento científico y el cambio científico que se pueden hallar en La estructura fueron adoptadas de esta cultura política de la Guerra Fría. Palabras clave: Thomas S. Kuhn; La estructura de las revoluciones científicas ; Richard Hofstadter; “The Paranoid Style in American Politics”; Guerra Fría; James B. Conant; lavado de cerebro. It is the use of paranoid modes of expression by more or less normal people that makes the phenomenon significant. –Richard Hofstadter (1964, 4) 1. Introduction The conventional wisdom holds that Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions of- fered a revolutionary critique of existing scholarship about science. The book swept aside misconceptions wrought by three kinds of intellectuals—logic-chopping philos- ophers who confused their logical models and formulas with historical fact, Whiggish historians who viewed science’s past through the lenses of the present, and text-book writers whose brief, potted historical introductions obscured science’s dynamic, revo- lutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measure of Detachment: Richard Hofstadter and the Progressive Historians
    A MEASURE OF DETACHMENT: RICHARD HOFSTADTER AND THE PROGRESSIVE HISTORIANS A Thesis Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS By Wiliiam McGeehan May 2018 Thesis Approvals: Harvey Neptune, Department of History Andrew Isenberg, Department of History ABSTRACT This thesis argues that Richard Hofstadter's innovations in historical method arose as a critical response to the Progressive historians, particularly to Charles Beard. Hofstadter's first two books were demonstrations of the inadequacy of Progressive methodology, while his third book (the Age of Reform) showed the potential of his new way of writing history. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................i CHAPTER 1. A MEASURE OF DETACHMENT..........................................................................1 2. SOCIAL DARWINISM IN AMERICAN THOUGHT………………………………………………26 3. THE AMERICAN POLITICAL TRADITION…………………………………………………………..52 4. THE AGE OF REFORM…………………………………………………………………………………….100 5. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………………………139 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..144 CHAPTER ONE A MEASURE OF DETACHMENT Great thinkers often spend their early years in rebellion against the teachers from whom they have learned the most. Freud would say they live out a form of the Oedipal archetype, that son must murder his father at least a little bit if he is ever to become his own man.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorizing Three Cases of Otherness in the USA: Hofstadter, Foucault, and Scott
    University of New England DUNE: DigitalUNE All Theses And Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2017 Theorizing Three Cases Of Otherness In The SU A: Hofstadter, Foucault, And Scott Austin Coco University of New England Follow this and additional works at: http://dune.une.edu/theses Part of the Political Science Commons © 2017 Austin Coco Preferred Citation Coco, Austin, "Theorizing Three Cases Of Otherness In The SAU : Hofstadter, Foucault, And Scott" (2017). All Theses And Dissertations. 136. http://dune.une.edu/theses/136 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at DUNE: DigitalUNE. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses And Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DUNE: DigitalUNE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Austin Coco Dr. Ahmida PSC 491 4/18//17 Theorizing Three Cases of Otherness in the USA: Hofstadter, Foucault, and Scott Austin Coco Coco|1 Dr. Ahmida PSC 491 4/18//17 Theorizing Three Cases of Otherness in the USA: Hofstadter, Foucault, and Scott Introduction This essay examines three cases of otherness: the Italian other in the 1920s, the Communist other during the Red Scare of the 1950s, and the Muslim other in post-2001. The similarities and differences of these cases will be analyzed through Richard Hofstadter’s analysis of the production of otherness for what he calls the paranoid style, Foucault’s analysis of power relations, and James Scott’s analysis of power relations and language. This essay will assess the theoretical methods behind “otherness” that Hofstadter, Foucault, and Scott use, the three cases of “otherness”, and the similarities and differences between the cases and how the theoretical mechanisms apply.
    [Show full text]
  • What Kind of Book Is the Ideological Origins of the American Revolution?
    What Kind of Book is The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution? eric nelson first read Bernard Bailyn’s The Ideological Origins of the I American Revolution when I was a nineteen-year-old stu- dent in the Harvard History Department’s sophomore tutorial. The text was assigned by my late friend and teacher Mark Kish- lansky, who began our discussion of the book by posing the same deceptively simple question that he asked about each his- toriographical masterwork on the syllabus: “What kind of book is this?” I remember thinking rather smugly that, in this case at least, the question had an obvious and straightforward answer: surely, Ideological Origins was a work of intellectual history— and, more specifically, a contribution to the history of early American political thought. But it now strikes me that this an- swer, while not incorrect, was, and is, quite beside the point. Mark was not asking us a banal question about the genre to which Bailyn’s monograph belonged, but rather a deep one about how Bailyn understood that genre. To present Ideological Origins as a history of political thought is, implicitly, to defend a particular conception of what sort of thing “political thought” is and what its history looks like. What, Mark wished us to pon- der, is that conception? I found myself asking this question with a renewed sense of urgency more than fifteen years later as I grappled witha I am indebted to Bernard Bailyn, Richard Bourke, Jonathan Gienapp, James Hank- ins, Michael Rosen, and Quentin Skinner for extremely helpful comments on this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mad, Mad World of Textbook Adoption
    The Mad, Mad World of Textbook Adoption Foreword by Chester E. Finn, Jr. Introduction by Diane Ravitch 1627 K Street Northwest Suite 600 Washington D.C. 20006 (202) 223-5452 (202) 223-9226 Fax www.edexcellence.net September 2004 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute is a nonprofit organization that conducts research, issues publications, and directs action projects in elementary/secondary education reform at the national level and in Dayton, Ohio. It is affiliated with the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Further information is at www.edexcellence.net/institute, or write us at 1627 K Street Northwest Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20006 This report is available in full on the web site. Additional copies can be ordered at www.edexcellence.net/institute/publication/order.cfm or by calling 410-634-2400. The Thomas B. Fordham Institute is neither connected with nor sponsored by Fordham University. Cover illustration by Thomas Fluharty, all rights reserved Design by Katherine Rybak Torres, all rights reserved Printed by District Creative Printing, Upper Marlboro, Maryland Executive Summary extbook Adoption: The process, in place in twenty-one states, of Treviewing textbooks according to state guidelines and then man- dating specific books that schools must use, or lists of approved text- books that schools must choose from. Textbook Adoption Is Bad for Students and Schools It consistently produces second-rate textbooks that replicate the same flaws and failings over and over again. Adoption states perform poorly on national tests, and the market incentives caused by the adop- tion process are so skewed that lively writing and top-flight scholarship are discouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Roosevelt on the Sinking of the Lusitania, 1915 Introduction
    1 Theodore Roosevelt on the sinking of the Lusitania, 1915 Introduction On May 7, 1915, the British passenger ship Lusitania, sailing from New York to Liverpool, was torpedoed by a German U-boat. The Lusitania sank, killing 1,195 people on board, including 123 Americans. The incident created sharp reactions among Americans, many of whom believed that the United States should inflict an immediate reprisal upon Germany. President Woodrow Wilson, however, took a cautious approach to responding to the attack, demanding from Germany an apology, compensation for American victims, and a pledge to discontinue unannounced submarine warfare. Former President Theodore Roosevelt disagreed with Wilson’s diplomatic response to the sinking of the Lusitania. Roosevelt believed that the attack warranted a military reprisal and that the United States had little choice but to enter the war. In June 1915, Roosevelt wrote to an aquaintance criticizing Wilson’s handling of the incident, writing, “If Lincoln had acted after the firing of Sumter in the way that Wilson did about the sinking of the Lusitania, in one month the North would have been saying they were so glad he kept them out of the war.” Criticizing both the government’s response and the American peoples’ apathy over the attack, Roosevelt wrote that he was “pretty well disgusted with our government and with the way our people acquiesce in and support it.” Excerpt Wilson and Bryan have quarreled over what seems to me an entirely insignificant point, that is, as to the percentage of water they shall put into a policy of mere milk and water.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman M. Kroll 1922–2004
    Norman M. Kroll 1922–2004 A Biographical Memoir by Joseph Kroll, Julius Kuti, and Mal Ruderman ©2015 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. NORMAN MYLES KROLL April 6, 1922–August 8, 2004 Elected to the NAS, 1974 Norman M. Kroll was one of the pioneers of the field of quantum electrodynamics and a brilliant theoretical phys- icist with deep physical insight and broad scientific inter- ests. His career began at Columbia University, where he and Willis Lamb published the first relativistic calculation of the Lamb Shift. He established himself as one of the pioneers in the field of quantum electrodynamics, and he rose quickly to the rank of full professor. Kroll was one of the founding faculty members of the Department of Physics at the University of California, San Diego, arriving in 1962 as a professor of physics after 20 years at Columbia BNL. Palmer, Robert Photograph courtesy University. He spent 40 years at UCSD, conducting research on electrodynamics, atomic physics, particle By Joseph Kroll, Julius Kuti physics, free electron lasers, and the design of subatomic and Mal Ruderman particle accelerators. In addition, he made numerous contributions to the development of UCSD as one of the nation’s leading research universities and served twice as chair of UCSD’s Department of Physics. A member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a fellow of the American Physical Society, he was regarded by his colleagues as one of the physics department’s most distinguished faculty members.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla's Connection to Columbia University by Dr. Kenneth L. Corum
    * Tesla’s Connection to Columbia University by Kenneth L. Corum and James F. Corum, Ph.D. “The invention of the wheel was perhaps rather obvious; but the invention of an invisible wheel, made of nothing but a magnetic field, was far from obvious, and that is what we owe to Nikola Tesla.” Professor Reginald Kapp, 1956 INTRODUCTION The Electrical Engineering curriculum at Columbia University, though not the first in the US, is one of the oldest and most respected EE programs in the world. From the beginning, a conscientious effort was made to base it on a foundation of science. It has been guided by the specific philosophy stated by Professor Michael Pupin: “Professor Crocker and I maintained that there is an ‘electrical science’ which is the real soul of electrical engineering.” Arguably the most stunning and significant lecture in modern history was presented one spring evening, more than a century ago, at Columbia University. The wealth of nations turned on its merits. Weighing on the balances would be our vast cities, civilization, and quality of life. But, what was it? . .Whatever it was, its impact has been as momentous for the progress and prosperity of civilization as the invention of the wheel! . It was Tesla’s great discovery and analysis of the rotating magnetic field, and a means for the electrical distribution of energy.1 As a result of the analysis presented in this lecture, the great Falls of Niagara would soon be harnessed for the benefit of mankind and launch civilization into the “Electromagnetic Century”. The Engineering Council for Professional Development (now called ABET) has defined “Engineering” as “that profession which utilizes the resources of the planet for the benefit of mankind”.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Cool New Worlds Beyond Our Solar System
    WINTER 2017-18 COLUMBIA MAGAZINE COLUMBIA COLUMBIAMAGAZINE WINTER 2017-18 Exploring cool new worlds beyond our solar system 4.17_Cover_FINAL.indd 1 11/13/17 12:42 PM JOIN THE CLUB Since 1901, the Columbia University Club of New York has been a social, intellectual, cultural, recreational, and professional center of activity for alumni of the eighteen schools and divisions of Columbia University, Barnard College, Teachers College, and affiliate schools. ENGAGE IN THE LEGACY OF ALUMNI FELLOWSHIP BECOME A MEMBER TODAY DAVE WHEELER DAVE www.columbiaclub.org Columbia4.17_Contents_FINAL.indd Mag_Nov_2017_final.indd 1 1 11/15/1711/2/17 12:463:13 PM PM WINTER 2017-18 PAGE 28 CONTENTS FEATURES 14 BRAVE NEW WORLDS By Bill Retherford ’14JRN Columbia astronomers are going beyond our solar system to understand exoplanets, fi nd exomoons, and explore all sorts of surreal estate 22 NURSES FIRST By Paul Hond How three women in New York are improving health care in Liberia with one simple but e ective strategy 28 JOIN THE CLUB LETTER HEAD By Paul Hond Scrabble prodigy Mack Meller Since 1901, the Columbia University Club of minds his Ps and Qs, catches a few Zs, and is never at a loss for words New York has been a social, intellectual, cultural, recreational, and professional center of activity for 32 CONFESSIONS alumni of the eighteen schools and divisions of OF A RELUCTANT REVOLUTIONARY Columbia University, Barnard College, By Phillip Lopate ’64CC Teachers College, and affiliate schools. During the campus protests of 1968, the author joined an alumni group supporting the student radicals ENGAGE IN THE LEGACY OF ALUMNI FELLOWSHIP 38 FARSIGHTED FORECASTS By David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Murray BUTLER Arranged Correspondence Box Contents Box
    Nicholas Murray BUTLER Arranged Correspondence Box contents Box# Box contents 1 Catalogued correspondence 2 A-AB 3 AC - ADAMS, J. 4 ADAMS, K.-AG 5 AH-AI 6 AJ-ALD 7 ALE-ALLEN, E. 8 ALLEN, F.-ALLEN, W. 9 ALLEN, Y. - AMERICAN AC. 10 AMERICAN AR. - AMERICAN K. 11 AMERICAN L.-AMZ 12 ANA-ANG 13 ANH-APZ 14 AR-ARZ 15 AS-AT 16 AU-AZ 17 B-BAC 18 BAD-BAKER, G. 19 BAKER, H. - BALDWIN 20 BALE-BANG 21 BANH-BARD 22 BARD-BARNES, J. 23 BARNES, N.-BARO 24 BARR-BARS 25 BART-BAT 26 BAU-BEAM 27 BEAN-BED 28 BEE-BELL, D. 29 BELL,E.-BENED 30 BENEF-BENZ 31 BER-BERN 32 BERN-BETT 33 BETTS-BIK 34 BIL-BIR 35 BIS-BLACK, J. 36 BLACK, K.-BLAN 37 BLANK-BLOOD 38 BLOOM-BLOS 39 BLOU-BOD 40 BOE-BOL 41 BON-BOOK 42 BOOK-BOOT 43 BOR-BOT 44 BOU-BOWEN 45 BOWER-BOYD 46 BOYER-BRAL 47 BRAM-BREG 48 BREH-BRIC 49 BRID - BRIT 50 BRIT-BRO 51 BROG-BROOKS 52 BROOKS-BROWN 53 BROWN 54 BROWN-BROWNE 55 BROWNE -BRYA 56 BRYC - BUD 57 BUE-BURD 58 BURE-BURL 59 BURL-BURR 60 BURS-BUTC 61 BUTLER, A. - S. 62 BUTLER, W.-BYZ 63 C-CAI 64 CAL-CAMPA 65 CAMP - CANFIELD, JAMES H. (-1904) 66 CANFIELD, JAMES H. (1905-1910) - CANT 67 CAP-CARNA 68 CARNEGIE (1) 69 CARNEGIE (2) ENDOWMENT 70 CARN-CARR 71 CAR-CASTLE 72 CAT-CATH 73 CATL-CE 74 CH-CHAMB 75 CHAMC - CHAP 76 CHAR-CHEP 77 CHER-CHILD, K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progressive Era Origins of the National Security Act
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 1-1-2000 The Progressive Era Origins of the National Security Act Mark R. Shulman Pace Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Law Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Recommended Citation Shulman, Mark R., "The Progressive Era Origins of the National Security Act" (2000). Pace Law Faculty Publications. 223. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/223 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Progressive Era Origins of the National Security Act Mark R.Shulman* Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger; real or pretended, from abroad. -James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, May 1798' I. Introduction to "National Security" The National Security Act of 1947* and its successors drew the blueprint of the Cold War domestic political order. This regime centralized control of the military services-the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and a newly separate Air Force-in a single executive branch department. It created a new professional organization to collect and analyze foreign intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency. And at the center of this new national security apparatus, a National Security Council would eventually establish foreign policy by coordinating intelligence and directing military and para-military forces, as well as supervising a National Security Resources Board.
    [Show full text]