Hill in Hell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hill in Hell 10CHAPTER Hill in Hell Chapter 10 begins with an account of how and why the 10.1.1. Start of De-ri-va-tion of Load Hill equation was introduced. The purpose of ‘the Hill’ From around 1850 on, somewhat different descriptions was if not to explain, then at least to describe the of various dose-response relations were formulated by aberrant behavior of dose-response relations and ease chemists/physicists (Wilhelmy 1850; Biot 1860; van’t calculations. In Sub-chapter 10.2, I illustrate and Hoff 1877; Guldberg & Waage 1967), physiologists discuss a frequently observed failure of linearity for working on for instance hemoglobin-oxygen binding experimental data in the so-called Hill plot Section (Hufner 1890; Bohr 1904a), and biochemists working 10.2.6. In Sub-chapter 10.3, there is an analysis and with enzymes (Brown 1902; Brown & Glendinning 1902; critique of what has been termed the ‘logistic’ Hill Henri 1903). equation. The ‘logistic’ Hill is rendered perspective Biot, a French physicist (1776Á1862), first realized against the original logistic equation. An explanation is that chemical reactions in solution follow a load-type given of how the ‘logistic’ Hill equation is a mere semi- rectangular hyperbolic function (Fig. 10.2) (Biot 1860, log presentation-possibility of data when it is inserted pp. 237Á243 and Plate II). He probably reached his pre- into the Hill scheme. The chapter concludes with a list Hill/pre-Langmuir load-equation on reading Wilhelmy’s of facts about the use of the Hill formulation (Sub- quantitative insight on chemical reactions (1850). As chapter 10.4). Finally, the reader is taken on a brief early as 1884, Hu¨fner also described binding of carbon- tour through the history and use of the term logistic in monoxide to hemoglobin by a load-type equation data analyses, summarized in a Sub-chapter, Appendix (Hufner 1884) (Fig. 10.3). 10.A, including statistical terms such as ‘logistic regres- After 1900, the dose-response relation in the form of sion’ and ‘polytomous logistic regression’. the load started to reappear in works by Ostwald (1902), Detailed descriptions of statistical theories, methods, Henri (1903), Hill (1909), and Micahelis-Menten and transformations can be found in various texts (see (1913). Meanwhile, at equilibrium, the hyperbolic load Sub-chapter 10.A). However, my purpose here is to reaction theory is usually referred to as the ‘isotherms of illustrate in a superior way the terms logistic and Langmuir’. This is due to Langmuir’s explicit theore- ‘logistic’, and thus maybe even resolve some of the tical formulation of the load and his confirmation of obfuscation about their use. the load by its experimental corroboration (Langmuir This chapter presents non-mechanistic models. 1918). Mechanistic models are detailed in Chapter 7. Here I shall refer to the ‘hyperbolic’ interaction both at equilibrium and at steady-state as the law of adsorption-desorption (load).1 The law is based on the 10.1. Deviations from the Law-of- fact that binding sites are limited (see Sections 1.1.2 adsorption-and-desorption and 1.1.8). Dose-response relations that follow the simple law-of- adsorption-desorption (load) give a plot that is a fraction of a rectangular hyperbolic curve (Fig. 1.3). In 1 Since Henri (1903) and Micahelis-Menten (1913) formulated steady- a semi-log plot, this fraction of the hyperbolic curve is an state expressions of the load, while Biot (1860), Hu¨fner (1884, 1890), Hill (1909), and Langmuir (1918) formulated equilibrium equations for S-shaped and symmetric curve. An example is the dotted the load, we may divide the law-of-adsorption-desorption into two line curves in Fig. 10.1AB (see also Fig. 8.1AB). types: an s-load (HMM-theory) and an e-load (BHHL-theory). # 2008 N Bindslev. This book and all matter and items published therein are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 257 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permiting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DOI: 10.3402/bindslev.2008.14 258 Part III: Test of Tools for Data Analysis A B 100 100 load / lin-lin load / semi-log 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 fractional response (%) fractional response (%) 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 [agonist] (rel-Ks) log [agonist] (rel-Ks) CD 100 100 Hill / lin-lin Hill / semi-log 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 fractional response (%) fractional response (%) 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 [agonist] (rel-Ks) log [agonist] (rel-Ks) Figure 10.1. The load and modified Hill equations in linear and semi-log plots. (A) LinearÁlinear plot of load. (B) Semi-log (‘logistic’) plot of load. (C) LinearÁlinear plot of Hill. (D) Semi-log (‘logistic’) plot of Hill. The five Hill plots in (C) and (D) are generated by the modified Hill equation with Ymax 100, Ks 1 and nH changing in five steps with the values 0.3333 (*), 0.6667, 1.0, 1.3333, and 1.6667 (Á××Á). Hill coefficient1.0 generates the plots in panel A and B. 10.1.2. Start of De-vi-a-tions from Load. K × xn y ; (10:1) Formulation of Hill’s Equation 1 K × xn At the turn of the last century, it had already been in which y is the observed saturation (fully-oxygen- observed that an experimental dose-response relation saturated hemoglobin aggregates) as a fraction of all deviated from the simple hyperbolic rectangular dose- hemoglobin conformations, bound or unbound, ‘x’ is response relation. Synagics for the hemoglobin-O2 the free ligand concentration (oxygen tension), and K binding as a function of O2 tension did not follow the in this equation has no physical meaning, but relates to simple load (Fig. 10.4) (Bohr 1904a,b; Bohr et al. 1904). its origin, an equilibrium association constant. The power Instead, the Hb-O2 saturation against O2 tension gave a n is known as Hill’s coefficient. When Hill’s coefficient is sigmoidal dose-response relation, equal to positive co- 1, Hill’s mathematical expression is identical to the operativity. A theory for this behavior that is now Langmuirian mechanistic expression for adsorption of accepted was formulated in a preliminary equation by gases, the load, Eq. 1.11. Thus, Hill just elevated the Adair (1925).2 In 1910, Hill had also formulated an concentration (oxygen tension) to an arbitrary power n Adair-type equation (see Eq. 10.6), but due to the (or nH for ‘the power of Hill’). tedious work of calculating all the constants, Hill In the linear scaled Cartesian coordinate system, advocated for a simplified version, namely Eq. 10.1 dose-responses that follow the Hill equation with a Hill given here and henceforth referred to as the Hill slope"1 (Fig. 10.1C) give plots that deviate from a equation (Hill 1910). His equation reads: hyperbolic curve (dotted curves in Figs. 10.1AC), while these plots in a semi-log diagram are symmetric and S-shaped curves just as the simple load (Figs. 10.1BD, also see Figs. 8.1 and 8.8). As mentioned, employing the Hill equation was only 2 Edsall gives a fine account of this story (Edsall 1980), see also Klotz meant as a quick way to estimate the co-operativity in (2004). experiments without any mechanistic interpretation, as Chapter 10: Hill in Hell 259 Figure 10.2. The origin of load curves. From Biot (1860, Plance II). its inventor also attested to (Hill 1910). He writes ‘My plot is a plot of the logit formulation (see Section object was rather to see whether an equation of this type 10.2.2). can satisfy all the observations, than to base any direct physical meaning on n and K’. Notice in this context, that there are three Hill- 10.1.3. Hill’s Aggregation Theory for Hemoglobin concepts: (1) the Hill equation (Eq. 10.1), (2) the Hill Complexation Crumbles coefficient, -factor, -power, or -slope, nH, and (3) the For complexation of a multi-unit hemoglobin, Hill Hill plot (see Section 8.2.5 and Fig. 8.8CF). The Hill postulated a so-called ‘aggregation theory’ (Hill 1910). 60 ) 3 40 20 CO-Hb complex (x10 experimental data calculated data 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 3 vc = "active mass of CO" (x 10 ) Figure 10.3. The origin of experimental data plots combined with the load theory. Carbon-monoxide binding to hemoglobin. Á3 Á3 Maximal binding76.993.410 ,EC50 199110 . After Hu¨fner (1884). 260 Part III: Test of Tools for Data Analysis 100 80 60 40 -saturation (%) 2 O 20 CO2 pressure = 40 mm Hg 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 O2 pressure (mm Hg) Figure 10.4. The origin of load-deviant behavior. Demonstration of a genuine sigmoidal dose-response relationship. Oxygen binding to hemoglobin in linearÁlinear dose-response plot. The relationship is determined at 40 mmHg CO2 with a maximal O2-saturation at 10492%, EC50 3191 mmHg O2 and a Hill coefficient nH equal to 2.1790.14. Redrawn from Bohr et al. (1904). In this theory, hemoglobin units, each with one atom of Physiology’. Herein Hill commented: ‘There can, how- n iron, can aggregate when O2 is bound. Thus, for all ever, be little doubt now that my equation yKx /(1 hemoglobin units, the actual binding site in a single and Kxn), based on the aggregation theory, is wrong, or at free hemoglobin unit associates or dissociates one least a serious over-simplification’.
Recommended publications
  • International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification
    0031-6997/03/5504-597–606$7.00 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Vol. 55, No. 4 Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 30404/1114803 Pharmacol Rev 55:597–606, 2003 Printed in U.S.A International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on Terms and Symbols in Quantitative Pharmacology RICHARD R. NEUBIG, MICHAEL SPEDDING, TERRY KENAKIN, AND ARTHUR CHRISTOPOULOS Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (R.R.N.); Institute de Recherches Internationales Servier, Neuilly sur Seine, France (M.S.); Systems Research, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (T.K.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (A.C.) Abstract ............................................................................... 597 I. Introduction............................................................................ 597 II. Working definition of a receptor .......................................................... 598 III. Use of drugs in definition of receptors or of signaling pathways ............................. 598 A. The expression of amount of drug: concentration and dose ............................... 598 1. Concentration..................................................................... 598 2. Dose. ............................................................................ 598 B. General terms used to describe drug action ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on Terms and Symbols in Quantitative Pharmacology
    0031-6997/03/5504-597–606$7.00 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Vol. 55, No. 4 Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 30404/1114803 Pharmacol Rev 55:597–606, 2003 Printed in U.S.A International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on Terms and Symbols in Quantitative Pharmacology RICHARD R. NEUBIG, MICHAEL SPEDDING, TERRY KENAKIN, AND ARTHUR CHRISTOPOULOS Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (R.R.N.); Institute de Recherches Internationales Servier, Neuilly sur Seine, France (M.S.); Systems Research, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (T.K.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (A.C.) Abstract ............................................................................... 597 I. Introduction............................................................................ 597 II. Working definition of a receptor .......................................................... 598 III. Use of drugs in definition of receptors or of signaling pathways ............................. 598 A. The expression of amount of drug: concentration and dose ............................... 598 Downloaded from 1. Concentration..................................................................... 598 2. Dose. ............................................................................ 598 B. General terms used to describe drug action ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Matters of Receptor Conformation
    Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation TERRY KENAKIN Department of Receptor Biochemistry, Glaxo SmithKline Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA ABSTRACT Concepts regarding the mechanisms by allosteric interaction resulted in an alteration of the which drugs activate receptors to produce physiological affinity of the receptor for the radiolabel. With the response have progressed beyond considering the re- technological advances enabling high-throughput func- ceptor as a simple on-off switch. Current evidence tional receptor screens should come an increase in the suggests that the idea that agonists produce only vary- types of GPCR ligands in the new millennium. This will ing degrees of receptor activation is obsolete and must result in an increase in the number of allosteric ligands be reconciled with data to show that agonist efficacy has (modulators, agonists, enhancers) that modify receptor texture as well as magnitude. Thus, agonists can block function without necessarily modifying steric access of system constitutive response (inverse agonists), behave the endogenous ligands to the receptor. Therefore, the as positive and inverse agonists on the same receptor changing mode of high-throughput screening can be (protean agonists), and differ in the stimulus pattern predicted to lead to an increase in the texture of drug they produce in physiological systems (ligand-selective types for GPCRs. Another reason for the increasing agonists). The molecular mechanism for this seemingly number of drug targets is increased knowledge of diverse array of activities is the same, namely, the GPCR behavior in cellular systems. This has led to the selective microaffinity of ligands for different confor- discovery of inverse agonism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Single Unified Model for Fitting Simple to Complex Receptor Response Data
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A single unifed model for ftting simple to complex receptor response data Peter Buchwald The ftting of complex receptor-response data where fractional response and occupancy do not match is challenging. They encompass important cases including (a) the presence of “receptor reserve” and/or partial agonism, (b) multiple responses assessed at diferent vantage points along a pathway, (c) responses that are diferent along diverging downstream pathways (biased agonism), and (d) constitutive activity. For these, simple models such as the well-known Clark or Hill equations cannot be used. Those that can, such as the operational (Black&Lef) model, do not provide a unifed approach, have multiple nonintuitive parameters that are challenging to ft in well-defned manner, have difculties incorporating binding data, and cannot be reduced or connected to simpler forms. We have recently introduced a quantitative receptor model (SABRE) that includes parameters for Signal Amplifcation (γ), Binding afnity (Kd), Receptor activation Efcacy (ε), and constitutive activity (εR0). It provides a single equation to ft complex cases within a full two-state framework with the possibility of incorporating receptor occupancy data (i.e., experimental Kds). Simpler cases can be ft by using consecutively reduced forms obtained by constraining parameters to specifc values, e.g., εR0 = 0: no constitutive activity, γ = 1: no amplifcation (Emax-type ftting), and ε = 1: no partial agonism (Clark equation). Here, a Hill-type extension is introduced (n ≠ 1), and simulated and experimental receptor- response data from simple to increasingly complex cases are ftted within the unifed framework of SABRE with diferently constrained parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Pharmacologic Receptors and Advances
    https://doi.org/10.31871/WJIR.8.6.8 World Journal of Innovative Research (WJIR) ISSN: 2454-8236, Volume-8, Issue-6, June 2020 Pages 91-100 Review of Pharmacologic Receptors and Advances Chukwu LC, Ekenjoku AJ, Okam P.C, Ohadoma SC, Olisa CL membrane as well as the inside of the cell. They can that can Abstract— The effects of most drugs result from their bind to a ligand and get triggered to alter their shape or interaction with macromolecular components of the same activity giving rise to a signal cascade of intracellular organism. These interactions have the capacity to alter the molecules - the second messengers, which, ultimately, results functions of the pertinent component and thereby initiate a in some change in the cell’s function (Tanner Marshall et al, cascade of biochemical and physiological changes that are characteristic of the response to the drug in question. The term 2020). receptor therefore, denotes the component of the organism with Receptors are specialized target macromolecules present which the chemical agent is presumed to interact. on the cell surface or intracellularly. Receptors bind drugs This drug-receptor is closely related to the enzyme-substrate and initiate events leading to alterations in biochemical complexes or that of antigen and antibody; these interactions and/or biophysical activity of a cell, and consequently, the have many common features, perhaps the most noteworthy function of an organ. Drugs may interact with receptors in being specificity of the receptor for a given ligand. However, the receptor not only has the ability to recognize a ligand, but can many different ways and may exert their effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Incorporating Receptor Theory in Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Modeling
    Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 24 (1): 3–15 (2009). Review Incorporating Receptor Theory in Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Modeling Bart A. PLOEGER1,3,*,PietH.vanderGRAAF2 and Meindert DANHOF1,3 1LAP&P Consultants BV, Leiden, The Netherlands 2Pfizer, Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism (PDM), Sandwich, United Kingdom 3Leiden-Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands Full text of this paper is available at http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/dmpk Summary: Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling helps to better understand drug efficacy and safety and has, therefore, become a powerful tool in the learning-confirming cycles of drug-development. In translational drug research, mechanism-based PK-PD modeling has been recognized as a tool for bringing forward early insights in drug efficacy and safety into the clinical development. These models differ from descriptive PK-PD models in that they quantitatively characterize specific processes in the causal chain be- tween drug administration and effect. This includes target site distribution, binding and activation, phar- macodynamic interactions, transduction and homeostatic feedback mechanisms. Compared to descriptive models mechanism-based PK-PD models that utilize receptor theory concepts for characterization of target binding and target activation processes have improved properties for extrapolation and prediction. In this respect, receptor theory constitutes the basis for 1) prediction of in vivo drug concentration-effect relation- ships and 2) characterization of target association-dissociation kinetics as determinants of hysteresis in the time course of the drug effect. This approach intrinsically distinguishes drug- and system specific parameters explicitly, allowing accurate extrapolation from in vitro to in vivo and across species.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Pharmacogenomic and Structural Analysis of Constitutive G-Protein
    Pharmacogenomic and structural analysis of constitutive G-protein coupled receptor activity Martine J. Smit1, Henry F. Vischer1, Remko A. Bakker1,3, Aldo Jongejan1, Henk Timmerman1, Leonardo Pardo2 and Rob Leurs1 1Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, de Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Laboratorio de Medicina Computacional, Unidad de Bioestadistica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 3Current address Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG 88397 Biberach, Germany. Keywords G-protein coupled receptors; constitutive activity; inverse agonism Abstract G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to a chemically diverse plethora of signal transduction molecules. The notion that GPCRs also signal without an external chemical trigger, i.e. in a constitutive or spontaneous manner, resulted in a paradigm shift in the field of GPCR pharmacology. With the recognition of constitutive GPCR activity and the fact that GPCR binding and signaling can be strongly affected by a single point mutation, GPCR pharmacogenomics obtained a lot of attention. For a variety of GPCRs, point mutations have been convincingly linked to human disease. Mutations within conserved motifs, known to be involved in GPCR activation, might explain the properties of some naturally occurring constitutively active GPCR variants linked to disease. A brief history historical introduction to the present concept of constitutive receptor activity is given and the pharmacogenomic and the structural aspects of constitutive receptor activity are described. 1. Introduction G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) form one of the most versatile families of proteins to respond to the chemically diverse plethora of signal transduction molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONTRIBUTION of K+ ION CHANNELS and the Ca2+-PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL to BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION
    THE CONTRIBUTION OF K+ ION CHANNELS AND THE Ca2+-PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL TO BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION. by Jeremy W Roy Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia October 2010 © Copyright by Jeremy W Roy, 2010 DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for acceptance a thesis entitled “THE CONTRIBUTION OF K+ ION CHANNELS AND THE Ca2+-PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL TO BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION” by Jeremy W Roy in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dated: October 26, 2010 Supervisor: _______________________________ Readers: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ ii DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DATE: October 26, 2010 AUTHOR: Jeremy W Roy TITLE: THE CONTRIBUTION OF K+ ION CHANNELS AND THE Ca2+- PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL TO BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION. DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL: Department of Physiology and Biophysics DEGREE: PhD CONVOCATION: May YEAR: 2011 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. _______________________________ Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author‟s written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than the brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacodynamics: the Study of Drug Action
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION ✜ Objectives 2 After completing this chapter, the reader should be able to Pharmacodynamics: ■ Describe the various mechanisms in which drug mol- The Study of Drug Action ecules elicit their effects. ■ Illustrate the effects of receptor-mediated agonists Ronald M. Dick, PhD, RPh and antagonists. ■ Describe the differences between competitive, non- competitive, and allosteric antagonism. ■ Compare and contrast the differences and similarities between ionophoric and metabophoric receptors. ■ Compare current and historic mechanisms of anes- thetic action in the body. ❚ Introduction behind theory, and it would take the introduction of the b The branch of pharmacology that relates drug concentra- -adrenergic antagonist, propranolol, in 1965 to provide tion to biologic effect is known as pharmacodynamics. the data necessary to completely convince the scientific Major goals of this area of study are determining the proper community that receptors truly exist. Since then, specific dose to administer to elicit the desired effect while avoiding molecular targets of action have been identified for nearly toxicity. Although pharmacokinetics can be used to deter- all drugs, and evidence for the receptor theory continues mine dosing requirements necessary to maintain a particu- to grow. However, a few drugs, such as osmotic laxatives, lar drug concentration, it is the relationship between drug do not appear to require receptor interactions to provide concentration and effect that ultimately decides appropri- their effects. Another class of compounds of particular ate dosing. The ultimate goal is to maintain a drug con- interest, the general anesthetics, apparently exhibit such a centration within the proper therapeutic window thereby wide array of effects that some in the scientific community avoiding toxicity while providing an adequate concentra- still do not subscribe to the idea that a receptor-mediated tion of the drug to provide the desired effect.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Gaurilcikaite Egle 14231
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Investigating mechanisms of odontogenic pain the role of odontoblasts, trigeminal ganglion neurons, and their interaction Gaurilcikaite, Egle Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 Investigating mechanisms of odontogenic pain: the role of odontoblasts, trigeminal ganglion neurons, and their interaction Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Egle Gaurilcikaite Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience King’s College London 2014-2018 1 Abstract Despite the prevalence of pain originating from the teeth (dental, or odontogenic, pain) and its impact on patients’ lives, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of odontogenic pain are still not completely understood.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONTRIBUTION of K+ ION CHANNELS and the Ca2+-PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL to BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION. by Jeremy W Roy Su
    THE CONTRIBUTION OF K+ ION CHANNELS AND THE Ca2+-PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL TO BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION. by Jeremy W Roy Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia October 2010 © Copyright by Jeremy W Roy, 2010 DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for acceptance a thesis entitled “THE CONTRIBUTION OF K+ ION CHANNELS AND THE Ca2+-PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL TO BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION” by Jeremy W Roy in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dated: October 26, 2010 Supervisor: _______________________________ Readers: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ ii DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY DATE: October 26, 2010 AUTHOR: Jeremy W Roy TITLE: THE CONTRIBUTION OF K+ ION CHANNELS AND THE Ca2+- PERMEABLE TRPM8 CHANNEL TO BREAST CANCER CELL PROLIFERATION. DEPARTMENT OR SCHOOL: Department of Physiology and Biophysics DEGREE: PhD CONVOCATION: May YEAR: 2011 Permission is herewith granted to Dalhousie University to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or institutions. _______________________________ Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author‟s written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than the brief excerpts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels: Structural Basis of Ligand Efficacy and Allosteric Modulation
    Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics , (), pp. –. Printed in the United Kingdom # Cambridge University Press Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels: structural basis of ligand efficacy and allosteric modulation " # " JUN LI , WILLIAM N. ZAGOTTA HENRY A. LESTER * " Division of Biology, -, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA , USA # Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box , Seattle, WA -, USA . . . Single-subunit proteins . Multisubunit proteins . Linear state model . MWC model . : f . . L! # . Ca +}calmodulin . Transition metal ions . Protons . Thiol-modifying reagents . Phosphorylation, etc . . . . . Most working proteins, including metabolic enzymes, transcription regulators, and membrane receptors, transporters, and ion channels, share the property of allosteric coupling. The term ‘allosteric’ means that these proteins mediate indirect interactions between sites that are physically separated on the protein. In the example of ligand-gated ion channels, the binding of a suitable ligand elicits local conformational changes at the binding site, which are coupled to further * To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Jun Li et al. conformational changes in regions distant from the binding site. The physical motions finally arrive at the site of biological activity: the ion-permeating pore. The conformational changes that lead from the ligand binding to the actual opening of the pore comprise
    [Show full text]