Quantifying Music the University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quantifying Music the University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science QUANTIFYING MUSIC THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO SERIES IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ASERIES OF BOOKS IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, METHODOLOGY, EPISTEMOLOGY, LOGIC, HISTORY OF SCIENCE, AND RELATED FIELDS Managing Editor ROBER T E. BUTTS Dept. ofPhilosophy, University of Western Ontario, Canada Editorial Board JEFFREY BUB, University ofWestern Ontario L. JONATHAN COHEN, Queen's College, Oxford WILLIAM DEMOPOULOS, University ofWestern Ontario WILLIAM HARPER, UniversityofWestern Ontario JAAKKO HINTIKKA CLiFFORD A. HOOKER, University ofNewcastle HENRY E. KYBURG, JR., UniversityofRochester AUSONIO MARRAS, University ofWestern Ontario JÜRGEN MITTELSTRASS, University of Konstanz JOHN M. NICHOLAS, University ofWestern Ontario GLENN A. PEARCE, University ofWestern Ontario BAS C. VAN FRAASSEN, University ofToronto & Princeton University VOLUME 23 H. F. COHEN Technical University Twente, Department o[ Social History o[ Seien ce and Technology, Enschede The Netherlands QUANTIFYING MUSIC The Science oi Music at the First Stage oi the Scientific Revolution, 1580-1650 Springer-Science+Business Media, B.Y. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cohen, H. F. Quantifying music. (The University of Western Ontario series in philosophy of science ; v.23) Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. I. Music-Acoustics and physics-16th century. 2. Music­ Acoustics and physics-17th century. I. Title. 11. Se ries. ML3807.C63 1984 781'.1 84-3270 ISBN 978-90-481-8388-3 ISBN 978-94-015-7686-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7686-4 All Rights Reserved © 1984 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1984 and other copyright owners as specified on appropriate pages within No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, inc1uding photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written perrnission from the copyright owner The ineffably heartfelt quality of music, owing to which it flows along as an intimately known yet perpetually remote Paradise, so fully intel­ ligible yet so inexplicable, comes from its reflecting all stirrings of our innermost Being, though quite devoid of reality and far removed from its pain. Arthur Schopenhauer (1819) Sounds can shed more light on Philosophy than any other quality, which is why the science of Music should not be neglected, even if all singing and playing were completely abolished and forbidden. Marin Mersenne (1636) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xvii CHAPTER 1 / DEFINING THE PROBLEM SITUATION 1.1. The Problem of Consonance 1 1.1.1. Zarlino's Redefinition of the Problem 3 1.1.2. Objections to the Senario 6 1.2. The Nature of the Scientific Revolution 7 1.2.1. The Science ofMusic Around 1600 10 1.3. Outline of Chapters 2 through 7 11 CHAPTER 2 / THE MATHEMA TICAL APPROACH 13 2.1. Johannes Kepler 13 2.1.1. The Empirical Foundation 15 2.1.2. Distinguishing Consonance from Dissonance 16 2.1.3. The Genesis of Harmony 23 2.1.4. Passing by Acoustics 29 2.1.5. Conclusions 32 2.2. The Division of the Octave 34 2.2.1. The Incompatibility of the Pure Consonances 37 2.2.2. Summary 43 2.3. Simon Stevin 45 2.3.1. 'On the Theory ofMusic' 48 2.3.2. Preliminary Defmitions 48 2.3.3. The Octave Comprises 6 Equal Tones 51 2.3.4. The Octave Comprises 12 Equal Semitones 53 2.3.5. Sustaining Arguments 57 2.3.6. A Musician's Critique 61 2.3.7. Contemporary Music 63 2.3.8. Conclusions 67 CHAPTER 3 / THE EXPERIMENT AL APPROACH 75 3.1. Giovanni Battista Benedetti 75 3.2. Vincenzo Galilei 78 vii viii T ABLE OF CONTENTS 3.2.1. The Singer's Dilemma 79 3.2.2. Smashing the Senario 82 3.2.3. Summary and Conc1usions 83 3.3. Galileo Galilei 85 3.3.1. Pendulums and Resonance 87 3.3.2. The Coincidence Theory of Consonance 90 3.3.3. Conc1usions 92 3.4. The Nature of the Coincidence Theory 94 3.5. Marin Mersenne 97 3.5.1. The 'Abstract ofMusical Theory' 100 3.5.2. Some Properties of Sound 101 3.5.3. The Coincidence Theory Put to the Test 103 3.5.4. The Division of the Octave 111 3.5.5. Quantifying All Possible Music 112 3.5.6. Conc1usions 114 CHAPTER 4 / THE MECHANISTIC APPROACH 115 4.1. Isaac Beeckman 116 4.1.1. The Corpuscular Theory of Sound 120 4.1.2. The Nature ofConsonance 127 4.1.3. Musical Instruments 147 4.1.4. Intermezzo: Consolations for the Physicist 149 4.1.5. The Division of the Octave 151 4.1.6. Conc1usions 157 4.2. Rene Descartes 161 4.2.1. The 'Compendium of Music' 161 4.2.2. The Scientific Analysis ofMusical Beauty 166 4.2.3. The Perception of Consonance 172 4.2.4. Conc1usions 175 CHAPTER 5 / CONT ACTS AND CRITICISMS 180 5.1. The Renaissance Theorists 181 5.2. The Early Physicists 182 5.2.1. Benedetti 183 5.2.2. Vincenzo Galilei 183 5.3. The Mathematicians 184 5.3.1. Stevin 184 5.3.2. Kepler 185 5.4. The Mersenne Circ1e 187 T ABLE OF CONTENTS ix 5.4.1. Prologue: Beeckman Meets Young Descartes 188 5.4.2. Beeckman, Descartes, and Mersenne 190 5.5. Galileo Galilei 201 5.6. Conc1usion 202 CHAPTER 6 / AN EXAMPLE FROM THE SECOND GENERATION 205 6.1. The Prevalence of the Coincidence Theory 206 6.2. Christiaan Huygens 209 6.2.1. The Theory ofConsonance 210 6.2.2. The Division of the Octave 214 6.2.3. The Consonance of the Intervals with 7 225 6.2.4. Conc1usion 228 CHAPTER 7 / CONCLUSIONS 231 7.1. 2500 Years since Pythagoras 231 7.1.1. What Had Been Accomplished and What Not 231 7.1.2. What Was To Be Accomplished 234 7.2. Music as a Science: Implications and Perspectives 243 7.2.1. The Scientific Revolution 243 7.2.2. Music as an Art and Music as a Science 250 7.2.3. The Victory of the Coincidence Theory: An Example of Theory Replacement 254 7.2.4. Quest Without End 258 NOTES 260 BIBLIOGRAPHY 296 NAME INDEX 303 SUBJECT INDEX 305 PREFACE The soul rejoices in perceiving harmonious sound; when the sound is not harmonious it is grieved. From these affects of the soul are derived the name of consonances for the harmonic proportions, and the name of dissonances for the unharmonic proportions. When to this is added the other harmonie proportion whieh consists of the longer or shorter duration of musical sound, then the soul stirs the body to jumping dance, the tongue to inspired speech, according to the same laws. The artisans accommodate to these harmonies the blows of their hammers, the soldiers their pace. As long as the harmonies endure, everything is alive; everything stiffens, when they are disturbed.! Thus the German astronomer, Johannes Kepler, evokes the power of music. Where does this power come from? What properties of music enable it to stir up emotions which may go far beyond just feeling generally pleased, and which may express themselves, for instance, in weeping; in laughing; in trembling over the whole body; in a marked acceleration of breathing and heartbeat; in participating in the rhythm with the head, the hands, the arms, and the feet? From the beginning of musical theory the answer to this question has been sought in two different directions. In the aesthetic approach to music, the explanation of the power of music has been sought in the analysis of compositional techniques. These may be of a nearly infinite variety. Specific musical effects can be shown to result from changes of tempo; from the choice of a certain key; from modulation; oma­ mentation; instrumentation; from the wider or narrower range of the melody; from dynamical contrasts; and so on. Surely analysis of music along such lines can reveal essential truths, and it may considerably enhance and deepen our enjoyment when we listen to music. However, there is another, scienti[ic approach to music, which takes as its starting point, not compositional techniques, but musical sound. In this approach, music is not looked at in terms of aesthetics, but in terms of mathematics, physics and physiology. Since compositional techniques, in the last analysis, come down to - highly differentiated - applications of musical sound, it may legitimately be asked whether ultimately a complete re duc­ ti on of the musical experience to physical and physiological mechanisms might be achieved. This is a highly intriguing question, to which as yet no xi xii PREFACE definitive answer can be given, since even if it would tentatively be answered in the affirmative, it is certain that such a final state has not yet been reached. In the course of this historical study we shall come across optimists and sceptics in this respect. Descartes, for instance, believed that people's varying tastes apriori preclude any such reduction to scientific analysis. As against this there were optimists like Heimholtz, who tried, for instance, to explain at least part of Palestrina's greatness by demonstrating that the spacing of chords in this composer's Masses and motets concurred with predictions that followed from Heimholtz' own physical/physiological theory of consonance. Whatever stand one may take on this issue,2 it is certain that the scientific analysis of musical sound has indeed revealed quite a lot of interesting musical truths. The present state of our knowledge in this domain may be gathered from such books as Wood's The Physics of Music (1975 7 ), or Roederer's Introduction to the Physics and Psychophysics of Music (19752).
Recommended publications
  • ACT Resources for Arts A/V Technology
    Career Cluster: Arts, A/V Technology, & Communications Mathematics in Digital Arts and Design III – Addresses standard 11 Question A graphic designer at a bottling company is tasked with designing efficient packaging for soda cans. Two options are being considered. Which of the two arrangements has less unused space in the package and how does the arrangement compare with the alternative? The radius of a soda can is approximately 3.2 cm. Package A Package B A. Package A; Package A has 16.7% less unused space than Package B. B. Package B; Package B has 16.7% less unused space than Package A. C. Package B; Package B has 8.3% less unused space than Package A. D. Neither; The two packages have equal unused space. Source: Adapted from Zordak, S. E. (n.d.). Soda Cans. Retrieved February 24, 2016, from http://illuminations.nctm.org/Lesson.aspx?id=2363 Office of Career and Technical Education • 710 James Robertson Parkway • Nashville, TN 37243 1 | March 2016 Tel: (615) 532-2830 • tn.gov/education/cte Career Cluster: Arts, A/V Technology, & Communications Science in A/V Production I – Addresses Standard 15 Passage I Natural Science: This passage is adapted from the chapter “The Wave Theory of Sound” in Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications by Allan Pierce. (Acoustical Society of America). Acoustics is the science of sound, including 20 ability, of communication via sound, along with the its production, transmission, and effects. In variety of psychological influences sound has on present usage, the term sound implies not only those who hear it.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Mersenne English Version
    MARIN MERSENNE (September 8, 1588 – September 1, 1648) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany Although no stamp with a portrait of the French mathematician MARIN MERSENNE has yet been issued, the postal administration of the Principality of Liechtenstein took the discovery of the 39th MERSENNE prime number = 13,466,917 − M13,466,9 17 2 1 as an opportunity to select this number as the motif for a stamp of a series on science (the graphic on the stamp below shows a logarithmic spiral). (drawings © Andreas Strick) EUCLID had already dealt with numbers of the type 2n −1 and, among other things, proved the theorem: If 2n −1 is a prime number, then 2n1- ⋅ (2 n − 1) is a perfect number. th Until the end of the 16 century it was believed that all numbers of the type 2n −1 were prime numbers if the exponent n was a prime number. In 1603, the Italian mathematician PIETRO CATALDI, who was also the first to write a treatise on continued fractions, proved the following: If the exponent n is not a prime number, i.e. if it can be represented as the product of n a⋅ b= with a b∈ , IN , then 2n −1 is not a prime number either; because then the number can be broken down into at least two factors: ⋅ − ⋅ 2a b − 12112 =( a −) ⋅( +a + 22 a + 23 a + ...2 + (b 1) a ). He also showed by systematic trial and error with all prime divisors up to the root of the number in question that 217 −1 and 219 −1 are prime numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding a Family of Fiddles
    The four members of the violin family have changed very little In hundreds of years. Recently, a group of musi- cians and scientists have constructed a "new" string family. 16 Founding a Family of Fiddles Carleen M. Hutchins An article from Physics Today, 1967. New measmement techniques combined with recent acoustics research enable us to make vioUn-type instruments in all frequency ranges with the properties built into the vioHn itself by the masters of three centuries ago. Thus for the first time we have a whole family of instruments made according to a consistent acoustical theory. Beyond a doubt they are musically successful by Carleen Maley Hutchins For three or folti centuries string stacles have stood in the way of practi- quartets as well as orchestras both cal accomplishment. That we can large and small, ha\e used violins, now routinely make fine violins in a violas, cellos and contrabasses of clas- variety of frequency ranges is the re- sical design. These wooden instru- siJt of a fortuitous combination: ments were brought to near perfec- violin acoustics research—showing a tion by violin makers of the 17th and resurgence after a lapse of 100 years— 18th centuries. Only recendy, though, and the new testing equipment capa- has testing equipment been good ble of responding to the sensitivities of enough to find out just how they work, wooden instruments. and only recently have scientific meth- As is shown in figure 1, oiu new in- ods of manufactiu-e been good enough struments are tuned in alternate inter- to produce consistently instruments vals of a musical fourth and fifth over with the qualities one wants to design the range of the piano keyboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics
    Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics Antoni Malet Daniele Cozzoli Pompeu Fabra University One of the most fascinating intellectual ªgures of the seventeenth century, Marin Mersenne (1588–1648) is well known for his relationships with many outstanding contemporary scholars as well as for his friendship with Descartes. Moreover, his own contributions to natural philosophy have an interest of their own. Mersenne worked on the main scientiªc questions debated in his time, such as the law of free fall, the principles of Galileo’s mechanics, the law of refraction, the propagation of light, the vacuum problem, the hydrostatic paradox, and the Copernican hypothesis. In his Traité de l’Harmonie Universelle (1627), Mersenne listed and de- scribed the mathematical disciplines: Geometry looks at continuous quantity, pure and deprived from matter and from everything which falls upon the senses; arithmetic contemplates discrete quantities, i.e. numbers; music concerns har- monic numbers, i.e. those numbers which are useful to the sound; cosmography contemplates the continuous quantity of the whole world; optics looks at it jointly with light rays; chronology talks about successive continuous quantity, i.e. past time; and mechanics concerns that quantity which is useful to machines, to the making of instruments and to anything that belongs to our works. Some also adds judiciary astrology. However, proofs of this discipline are The papers collected here were presented at the Workshop, “Mersenne and Mixed Mathe- matics,” we organized at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona), 26 May 2006. We are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Education and the Catalan Department of Universities for their ªnancial support through projects Hum2005-05107/FISO and 2005SGR-00929.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-Contact
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-contact Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection of Rails: Next Generation Approach A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Structural Engineering by Stefano Mariani Committee in Charge: Professor Francesco Lanza di Scalea, Chair Professor David J. Benson Professor Michael J. Buckingham Professor William S. Hodgkiss Professor Chia-Ming Uang 2015 Copyright, Stefano Mariani, 2015 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Stefano Mariani is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii DEDICATION To Bob iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page iii Dedication iv Table of Contents v List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures xi List of Tables xxii Acknowledgments xxiv Vita xvii Abstract of the Dissertation xxix 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Non Destructive Evaluation of railroad tracks. Introductory discussions and motivations for the research ............................................................................................ 1 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • Music and Science from Leonardo to Galileo International Conference 13-15 November 2020 Organized by Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini, Lucca
    MUSIC AND SCIENCE FROM LEONARDO TO GALILEO International Conference 13-15 November 2020 Organized by Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini, Lucca Keynote Speakers: VICTOR COELHO (Boston University) RUDOLF RASCH (Utrecht University) The present conference has been made possibile with the friendly support of the CENTRO STUDI OPERA OMNIA LUIGI BOCCHERINI www.luigiboccherini.org INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MUSIC AND SCIENCE FROM LEONARDO TO GALILEO Organized by Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini, Lucca Virtual conference 13-15 November 2020 Programme Committee: VICTOR COELHO (Boston University) ROBERTO ILLIANO (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) FULVIA MORABITO (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) RUDOLF RASCH (Utrecht University) MASSIMILIANO SALA (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) ef Keynote Speakers: VICTOR COELHO (Boston University) RUDOLF RASCH (Utrecht University) FRIDAY 13 NOVEMBER 14.45-15.00 Opening • FULVIA MORABITO (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) 15.00-16.00 Keynote Speaker 1: • VICTOR COELHO (Boston University), In the Name of the Father: Vincenzo Galilei as Historian and Critic ef 16.15-18.15 The Galileo Family (Chair: Victor Coelho, Boston University) • ADAM FIX (University of Minnesota), «Esperienza», Teacher of All Things: Vincenzo Galilei’s Music as Artisanal Epistemology • ROBERTA VIDIC (Hochschule für Musik und Theater Hamburg), Galilei and the ‘Radicalization’ of the Italian and German Music Theory • DANIEL MARTÍN SÁEZ (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), The Galileo Affair through
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Mersenne: Minim Monk and Messenger; Monotheism, Mathematics, and Music
    Marin Mersenne: Minim Monk and Messenger; Monotheism, Mathematics, and Music Karl-Dieter Crisman (Gordon College) Karl-Dieter Crisman is Professor of Mathematics at Gordon Col- lege, but first heard of Mersenne in both math and music courses as an undergraduate at Northwestern University. His main scholarly work focuses on open software resources for mathematics, and the mathematics of voting. He is certain Mersenne would see as many connections between those topics and faith as he did with the math of music and physics. Abstract Marin Mersenne is one of many names in the history of mathematics known more by a couple of key connections than for their overall life and accomplishments. Anyone familiar with number theory has heard of ‘Mersenne primes’, which even occasionally appear in broader media when a new (and enormous) one is discovered. Instructors delving into the history of calculus a bit may know of him as the interlocutor who drew Fermat, Descartes, and others out to discuss their methods of tangents (and more). In most treatments, these bare facts are all one would learn about him. But who was Mersenne, what did he actually do, and why? This paper gives a brief introduction to some important points about his overall body of work, using characteristic examples from his first major work to demonstrate them. We’ll especially look into why a monk from an order devoted to being the least of all delved so deeply into (among other things) exploratory math- ematics, practical acoustics, and defeating freethinkers, and why that might be of importance today. 1 Introduction The seventeenth century was a time of ferment in the sciences in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • From My Notebooks, 1975-81 Arnold Dreyblatt Proposition IX: to Explain
    From My Notebooks, 1975-81 Arnold Dreyblatt Proposition IX: To explain why an open string when sounded makes many sounds at once. Proposition XV: To determine whether it is possible to touch the strings of an instrument or their keys so fast that the ear cannot discern whether the sound is composed of different sounds, or if it is unique and continuous. - Marin Mersenne, Harmonie Universelle, 1637 My work in image and sound synthesis in the early seventies initiated an interest in the interactions of waveform signal events an their hearing in the audio range, as sound , on acoustic instruments and finally, as music. Having neither a traditional music training or childhood indoctrination in this or that cultural scale or system I have found it convenient to apply my background in experimenting with electronic sound and image to composition with acoustic instruments: utilizing a tuning system derived from the harmonic series in lieu of traditional musical content. The revolution in music language description of the last twenty years has evolved through the construction and re-thinking of music making tools and the resultant intimacy which has been re-established with acoustic dynamics and properties of sound. I have begun to see the development of western music resulting in an aberration. The relative standardization and specialization in notation, instrumental construction and tuning is a situation heretofore unparalleled in the incredibly diverse music cultures of the world. Equal Temperament and the gradual shift towards atonality represent a gradual disregard of the basic acoustic model. Technical improvements to satisfy the needs of chromaticism and loudness have distanced the modern music maker and listener from the basic acoustic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E
    FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Principles Of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E. Stern Forgach PRINCIPLES OF ACOUSTICS Andrés Porta Contreras Department of Physics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Catalina E. Stern Forgach Department of Physics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Keywords: Acoustics, Ear, Diffraction, Doppler effect, Music, Sound, Standing Waves, Ultrasound, Vibration, Waves. Contents 1. Introduction 2. History 3. Basic Concepts 3.1. What is Sound? 3.2. Characteristics of a Wave 3.3. Qualities of Sound 3.3.1. Loudness 3.3.2. Pitch 3.3.3. Timbre 3.4. Mathematical Description of a Pure Sound Wave 3.5. Doppler Effect 3.6. Reflection and Refraction 3.7. Superposition and Interference 3.8. Standing Waves 3.9. Timbre, Modes and Harmonics 3.10. Diffraction 4. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Sound 4.1. Anatomy and Physiology of Hearing. 4.1.1. Outer Ear 4.1.2. Middle Ear 4.1.3. Inner Ear 5. ApplicationsUNESCO – EOLSS 5.1. Ultrasound 5.2. Medicine 5.3. Noise Control 5.4. MeteorologySAMPLE and Seismology CHAPTERS 5.5. Harmonic Synthesis 5.6. Acoustical Architecture and Special Building Rooms Design 5.7. Speech and Voice 5.8. Recording and Reproduction 5.9. Other Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Principles Of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E. Stern Forgach Summary The chapter begins with a brief history of acoustics from Pythagoras to the present times. Then the main physical and mathematical principles on acoustics are reviewed. A general description of waves is given first, then the characteristics of sound and some of the most common phenomena related to acoustics like echo, diffraction and the Doppler effect are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Different Parameters of Architectural Buildings
    IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 6, Issue 2 Ver. III (Mar-Apr. 2014), PP 01-06 www.iosrjournals.org An Analysis of Different Parameters of Architectural Buildings Neetu Bargoti 1, A. K. Srivastava2 1Research Scholar, Dr.C.V.Raman University Kota, Bilaspur 2Prof. & Head, Dr.C.V.Raman University Kota, Bilaspur Abstract: Today much importance is given to the acoustical buildings. It plays an important role in creating an acoustically pleasing environment. In this paper an attempt has been given to analysis of different parameters of architectural buildings. Before 1900 A.D. there was no basis of the design of rooms and balls for huge gatherings because the causes of bad hearing were not known to them. In ancient and medieval periods the designs of buildings like Bhuvneshwar temple , Taj Mahal and St. Paul’s Cathedral in London etc. in which sound produced kept on reverberating for a pretty long period, were looked upon with an eye of awe, reverence and a piece of admiration and appreciation. On July 30, 2013 devotes caught in a stampede near Baidyanath Dham, on July 15, 1996 Pilgrims died at the Mahakaleshwar Temple Ujjain, & incident of Uphar Cinema Hall;, June 13,1997 it was totally ignorance of acoustics. This paper describes how the materials like fibre type, fibre size, material thickness, density, airflow resistance and porosity can affect the architectural buildings. At last all the relevant parameters of architectural buildings have been discussed comprehensively. Key words: acoustics, architectural, reverberation, porosity, air flow resistance. I. Introduction Architectural buildings are related with acoustics.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 5A: Mersenne's Laws & Melde's Experiment
    CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 1 Lab 5a: Mersenne’s Laws & Melde's experiment Introduction Vincenzo Galilei (1520 –1591), the father of Galileo Galilei, was an Italian lutenist, composer, and music theorist. It is reported that he showed that the pitch of a vibrating string was proportional to the square root of its tension. In other words, in order to increase the pitch by an octave (factor of 2 in frequency) it would require the tension to be quadrupled. Marin Mersenne (1588-1648, see picture), often called the “father of acoustics” , around 1630 published a book summarizing the properties of sound, based on the earlier work of Vincenzo and Galileo. He established that: • Frequency is inversely proportional to length of string • Frequency is inversely proportional to the diameter of the string • Frequency is proportional to the root of the tension • Frequency is inversely proportional to the root of the mass (density) of the string. So in summary, if you want a low note, use a fat (massive) long string under low tension. For a high pitch, use a thin short string under high tension. We can summarize all of his results with a single equation showing that the frequency “f” is proportional to: 1 F f ∝ , (1) L µ where “L” is the length of the violin string, “F” is the tension (in Newtons of force) and µ (“mu”) is the mass density of the string (in units of mass per unit length, e.g. kg per meter). In this experiment the string is assumed to be vibrating in its “fundamental” mode, like this, (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Mathematics on the Art and Science of Acoustic Instruments
    Musical Mathematics on the art and science of acoustic instruments Cris Forster MUSICAL MATHEMATICS ON THE ART AND SCIENCE OF ACOUSTIC INSTRUMENTS MUSICAL MATHEMATICS ON THE ART AND SCIENCE OF ACOUSTIC INSTRUMENTS Text and Illustrations by Cris Forster Copyright © 2010 by Cristiano M.L. Forster All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available. ISBN: 978-0-8118-7407-6 Manufactured in the United States. All royalties from the sale of this book go directly to the Chrysalis Foundation, a public 501(c)3 nonprofit arts and education foundation. https://chrysalis-foundation.org Photo Credits: Will Gullette, Plates 1–12, 14–16. Norman Seeff, Plate 13. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Chronicle Books LLC 680 Second Street San Francisco, California 94107 www.chroniclebooks.com In Memory of Page Smith my enduring teacher And to Douglas Monsour our constant friend I would like to thank the following individuals and foundations for their generous contributions in support of the writing, designing, and typesetting of this work: Peter Boyer and Terry Gamble-Boyer The family of Jackson Vanfleet Brown Thomas Driscoll and Nancy Quinn Marie-Louise Forster David Holloway Jack Jensen and Cathleen O’Brien James and Deborah Knapp Ariano Lembi, Aidan and Yuko Fruth-Lembi Douglas and Jeanne Monsour Tim O’Shea and Peggy Arent Fay and Edith Strange Charles and Helene Wright Ayrshire Foundation Chrysalis Foundation The jewel that we find, we stoop and take’t, Because we see it; but what we do not see We tread upon, and never think of it.
    [Show full text]