Lab 5A: Mersenne's Laws & Melde's Experiment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lab 5A: Mersenne's Laws & Melde's Experiment CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 1 Lab 5a: Mersenne’s Laws & Melde's experiment Introduction Vincenzo Galilei (1520 –1591), the father of Galileo Galilei, was an Italian lutenist, composer, and music theorist. It is reported that he showed that the pitch of a vibrating string was proportional to the square root of its tension. In other words, in order to increase the pitch by an octave (factor of 2 in frequency) it would require the tension to be quadrupled. Marin Mersenne (1588-1648, see picture), often called the “father of acoustics” , around 1630 published a book summarizing the properties of sound, based on the earlier work of Vincenzo and Galileo. He established that: • Frequency is inversely proportional to length of string • Frequency is inversely proportional to the diameter of the string • Frequency is proportional to the root of the tension • Frequency is inversely proportional to the root of the mass (density) of the string. So in summary, if you want a low note, use a fat (massive) long string under low tension. For a high pitch, use a thin short string under high tension. We can summarize all of his results with a single equation showing that the frequency “f” is proportional to: 1 F f ∝ , (1) L µ where “L” is the length of the violin string, “F” is the tension (in Newtons of force) and µ (“mu”) is the mass density of the string (in units of mass per unit length, e.g. kg per meter). In this experiment the string is assumed to be vibrating in its “fundamental” mode, like this, (figure 1). In other words, the wavelength of the vibration is: λ1=2L. It is said that Pythagoras found that if you put your finger midway on the string, the string would sing an octave higher (i.e. double the frequency). In this case we have, (figure 2) and now the wavelength of the vibration is λ2=L. Further, if you put the finger 1/3 of the way along the string it would vibrate, Version 4.5 © 2013July24 all rights reserved Dr. Bill Pezzaglia CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 2 (figure 3) where the wavelength of the vibration is: λ1=(2/3)L . Detailed study of the modes of vibration of a string and the relationship to frequency was done (I think) by Joseph Sauveur (1653-1713), who around 1730 suggested the term " acoustics " from the greek word for "sound" [see also Jean-Phillipe Rameau]. He coined the term “ node ” for the part of the string that does not seem to move, and “ fundamental ” for the lowest frequency-mode vibration of a string. He also introduced the term “ harmonic ”. Hence, figure 1 (the fundamental) which has two nodes (and one antinode ) is called the “ first harmonic ”. Figure 2 (3 nodes, and 2 antinodes) is the 2nd harmonic . Figure 3 (4 nodes and 3 antinodes) is the 3rd harmonic . Hence the number of antinodes is the “number” of the harmonic. 2L The wavelengths of the “nth” harmonic is hence: λ = , where “n” is the number of n n antinodes (or the number of nodes minus 1). WaveSpeed : From observed data, it was found that the wavespeed: v=f λ. was the same for all the harmonics on a string (assuming we don’t change the tension of the string). Putting Sauveur’s ideas together with Mersenne’s formula one can show that the speed of the wave on a string must be proportional to the root of the ratio of the tension divided by mass density. Indeed this is the case (validated by other mathematicians describing the elastic nature of a string), F v = . (2) µ We are essentially going to check this relation by using Franz Melde’s classic experiment. He used an electric vibrator connected to a string which goes over a pulley (creates a node here) with a mass suspended at the end. Hence the tension in the string is just F=mg (where m is the mass, g is the acceleration of gravity). He was able to get “ standing waves ” (a term he coined) which appear to stand still, if the tension is just right. Version 4.5 © 2013July24 all rights reserved Dr. Bill Pezzaglia CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 3 EXPERIMENT: We will hold the length fixed (approximately L=0.70 meters), and vary either the frequency or the tension (hence the wavespeed) to create the different standing nodes. By measuring the wavelength (and knowing the frequency) we can determine the wavespeed. Hence we can show if the formula (2) is valid by plotting Tension Force “F” vs the squared wavespeed “v” and seeing if it comes out to be a line. The slope of the line will give the mass density of the string. A. Setup 1. Physical setup : Make the distance from the vibrating reed to the pulley approximately L=0.70 meters. Vibrator Metal Reed Pulley Hanger Extra Masses Meter Stick Interface Box 2. Computer Set-up The vibrator is already connected to the output of the interface box. Call up DataStudio and click on Create Experiment. At the bottom of the Sensors panel you will find Signal Output . Click on Output . A window titled Signal Generator will pop up like the one below. Version 4.5 © 2013July24 all rights reserved Dr. Bill Pezzaglia CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 4 The signal generator controls the frequency and amplitude of the vibrating metal reed. Click the Auto button. This activates the On/Off buttons. So you can turn the vibrator on and off. Under Frequency the +- buttons will change the frequency in steps of 100 Hz (this is the default). The arrow buttons ◄► will change the step size. Possible step sizes are 1000 Hz, 100 Hz, 10 Hz, 1 Hz, 0.1 Hz. The Amplitude of the reed can be adjusted in a similar manner. B. Variable Mode Number Here we keep the length "L" fixed, and keep tension fixed (use approximately 200 grams? More?), but vary the frequency to excite the various modes of oscillation. 1. Hang 0.200 kg on the end of the string, including the 0.050 kg mass hanger. 2. Determine the frequencies of modes 1 through at least 5. 3. For each mode, measure the wavelength λ 4. Calculate the wavespeed: v=f λ for each mode Question 1. (a) What is your fundamental frequency? (b) We expect that the frequency of the “n-th” mode is “n” times the fundamental. Is this true? (c) The wavespeeds should all be the same. Are they? Question 2. (a) What is the tension in your string? [Hint: F=mg] (b) From your tension and average wavespeed calculate your measured mass density from equation (2). Question 3. Using a sample of string, measure its mass and length (be sure to record your values!), and determine the mass density. Compare to your result in question 2. Question 4. [extra credit] Plot frequency vs mode number (Plot #1). The slope will give you a better determination of the fundamental frequency. Plot 1: Determination of Fudamental Frequency (Variable Modes) 300 y = 56.6x - 0.2 250 R2 = 0.9999 200 150 100 Frequency, Hz 50 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Mode Number Version 4.5 © 2013July24 all rights reserved Dr. Bill Pezzaglia CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 5 C. Variable Tension [if time permits] Hold length "L" fixed. For this experiment you will change the tension on the string, and find the resonant frequency for the n=2 mode. Take at least 5 data points for the mass ranging from 50 grams (0.05 kg) to 1 kg. 1. Data table should include: • Mass • Force=mg • Measured resonant frequency "f" (for mode n=2) • Wavelength (should stay constant if you don't vary "L") • Wavespeed: v=(frequency)x(wavelength) • squared wavespeed 2. Reduction : PLOT tension force vs squared wavespeed (Plot #2). Graph should be a line, with slope giving the mass. • Calculate tension and wave velocity • Plot tension F vs square speed v2 • Draw the best line (if line looks weird, ask instructor to look at it) • Get the slope of the line. • A value of R 2 of 0.99 means you did well. If R 2<0.9 probably you have bad measurements. SUMMARY (essay questions based on Plot #2) Question 5. We expect that the square of the velocity will be proportional to the tension. Does your graph #2 validate this? [Hint: do the points fall on a line?] Question 6. From the formulas, the expected slope of the line will be the mass density µ (in kg per meter). What is the slope of your graph? Question 7. Compare your “measured” mass density with the value the lab tech told − me: µ= 3.0 × 10 4 kg/m. Are you close? Version 4.5 © 2013July24 all rights reserved Dr. Bill Pezzaglia CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 6 Sample Plot #2 Note the slope here implies the mass density is 0.0032 kg/meter The title shoud include the frequency used and the string length. Version 4.5 © 2013July24 all rights reserved Dr. Bill Pezzaglia .
Recommended publications
  • ACT Resources for Arts A/V Technology
    Career Cluster: Arts, A/V Technology, & Communications Mathematics in Digital Arts and Design III – Addresses standard 11 Question A graphic designer at a bottling company is tasked with designing efficient packaging for soda cans. Two options are being considered. Which of the two arrangements has less unused space in the package and how does the arrangement compare with the alternative? The radius of a soda can is approximately 3.2 cm. Package A Package B A. Package A; Package A has 16.7% less unused space than Package B. B. Package B; Package B has 16.7% less unused space than Package A. C. Package B; Package B has 8.3% less unused space than Package A. D. Neither; The two packages have equal unused space. Source: Adapted from Zordak, S. E. (n.d.). Soda Cans. Retrieved February 24, 2016, from http://illuminations.nctm.org/Lesson.aspx?id=2363 Office of Career and Technical Education • 710 James Robertson Parkway • Nashville, TN 37243 1 | March 2016 Tel: (615) 532-2830 • tn.gov/education/cte Career Cluster: Arts, A/V Technology, & Communications Science in A/V Production I – Addresses Standard 15 Passage I Natural Science: This passage is adapted from the chapter “The Wave Theory of Sound” in Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications by Allan Pierce. (Acoustical Society of America). Acoustics is the science of sound, including 20 ability, of communication via sound, along with the its production, transmission, and effects. In variety of psychological influences sound has on present usage, the term sound implies not only those who hear it.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Mersenne English Version
    MARIN MERSENNE (September 8, 1588 – September 1, 1648) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany Although no stamp with a portrait of the French mathematician MARIN MERSENNE has yet been issued, the postal administration of the Principality of Liechtenstein took the discovery of the 39th MERSENNE prime number = 13,466,917 − M13,466,9 17 2 1 as an opportunity to select this number as the motif for a stamp of a series on science (the graphic on the stamp below shows a logarithmic spiral). (drawings © Andreas Strick) EUCLID had already dealt with numbers of the type 2n −1 and, among other things, proved the theorem: If 2n −1 is a prime number, then 2n1- ⋅ (2 n − 1) is a perfect number. th Until the end of the 16 century it was believed that all numbers of the type 2n −1 were prime numbers if the exponent n was a prime number. In 1603, the Italian mathematician PIETRO CATALDI, who was also the first to write a treatise on continued fractions, proved the following: If the exponent n is not a prime number, i.e. if it can be represented as the product of n a⋅ b= with a b∈ , IN , then 2n −1 is not a prime number either; because then the number can be broken down into at least two factors: ⋅ − ⋅ 2a b − 12112 =( a −) ⋅( +a + 22 a + 23 a + ...2 + (b 1) a ). He also showed by systematic trial and error with all prime divisors up to the root of the number in question that 217 −1 and 219 −1 are prime numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 12. Vibrating Strings
    Lab 12. Vibrating Strings Goals • To experimentally determine the relationships between the fundamental resonant frequency of a vibrating string and its length, its mass per unit length, and the tension in the string. • To introduce a useful graphical method for testing whether the quantities x and y are related by a “simple power function” of the form y = axn. If so, the constants a and n can be determined from the graph. • To experimentally determine the relationship between resonant frequencies and higher order “mode” numbers. • To develop one general relationship/equation that relates the resonant frequency of a string to the four parameters: length, mass per unit length, tension, and mode number. Introduction Vibrating strings are part of our common experience. Which as you may have learned by now means that you have built up explanations in your subconscious about how they work, and that those explanations are sometimes self-contradictory, and rarely entirely correct. Musical instruments from all around the world employ vibrating strings to make musical sounds. Anyone who plays such an instrument knows that changing the tension in the string changes the pitch, which in physics terms means changing the resonant frequency of vibration. Similarly, changing the thickness (and thus the mass) of the string also affects its sound (frequency). String length must also have some effect, since a bass violin is much bigger than a normal violin and sounds much different. The interplay between these factors is explored in this laboratory experi- ment. You do not need to know physics to understand how instruments work. In fact, in the course of this lab alone you will engage with material which entire PhDs in music theory have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on the History of Modern Acoustics François Ribac, Viktoria Tkaczyk
    Research on the history of modern acoustics François Ribac, Viktoria Tkaczyk To cite this version: François Ribac, Viktoria Tkaczyk. Research on the history of modern acoustics. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, Société d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 2019, Musical knowl- edge, science studies, and resonances, 13 (3), pp.707-720. 10.3917/rac.044.0707. hal-02423917 HAL Id: hal-02423917 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02423917 Submitted on 26 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF MODERN ACOUSTICS Interview with Viktoria Tkaczyk, director of the Epistemes of Modern Acoustics research group at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin François Ribac S.A.C. | « Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances » 2019/3 Vol. 13, No 3 | pages 707 - 720 This document is the English version of: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- François Ribac, « Recherche en histoire de l’acoustique moderne », Revue d'anthropologie
    [Show full text]
  • Linear and Nonlinear Waves
    Scholarpedia, 4(7):4308 www.scholarpedia.org Linear and nonlinear waves Graham W. Griffithsy and William E. Schiesser z City University,UK; Lehigh University, USA. Received April 20, 2009; accepted July 9, 2009 Historical Preamble The study of waves can be traced back to antiquity where philosophers, such as Pythagoras (c.560-480 BC), studied the relation of pitch and length of string in musical instruments. However, it was not until the work of Giovani Benedetti (1530-90), Isaac Beeckman (1588-1637) and Galileo (1564-1642) that the relationship between pitch and frequency was discovered. This started the science of acoustics, a term coined by Joseph Sauveur (1653-1716) who showed that strings can vibrate simultaneously at a fundamental frequency and at integral multiples that he called harmonics. Isaac Newton (1642-1727) was the first to calculate the speed of sound in his Principia. However, he assumed isothermal conditions so his value was too low compared with measured values. This discrepancy was resolved by Laplace (1749-1827) when he included adiabatic heating and cooling effects. The first analytical solution for a vibrating string was given by Brook Taylor (1685-1731). After this, advances were made by Daniel Bernoulli (1700-82), Leonard Euler (1707-83) and Jean d'Alembert (1717-83) who found the first solution to the linear wave equation, see section (3.2). Whilst others had shown that a wave can be represented as a sum of simple harmonic oscillations, it was Joseph Fourier (1768-1830) who conjectured that arbitrary functions can be represented by the superposition of an infinite sum of sines and cosines - now known as the Fourier series.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding a Family of Fiddles
    The four members of the violin family have changed very little In hundreds of years. Recently, a group of musi- cians and scientists have constructed a "new" string family. 16 Founding a Family of Fiddles Carleen M. Hutchins An article from Physics Today, 1967. New measmement techniques combined with recent acoustics research enable us to make vioUn-type instruments in all frequency ranges with the properties built into the vioHn itself by the masters of three centuries ago. Thus for the first time we have a whole family of instruments made according to a consistent acoustical theory. Beyond a doubt they are musically successful by Carleen Maley Hutchins For three or folti centuries string stacles have stood in the way of practi- quartets as well as orchestras both cal accomplishment. That we can large and small, ha\e used violins, now routinely make fine violins in a violas, cellos and contrabasses of clas- variety of frequency ranges is the re- sical design. These wooden instru- siJt of a fortuitous combination: ments were brought to near perfec- violin acoustics research—showing a tion by violin makers of the 17th and resurgence after a lapse of 100 years— 18th centuries. Only recendy, though, and the new testing equipment capa- has testing equipment been good ble of responding to the sensitivities of enough to find out just how they work, wooden instruments. and only recently have scientific meth- As is shown in figure 1, oiu new in- ods of manufactiu-e been good enough struments are tuned in alternate inter- to produce consistently instruments vals of a musical fourth and fifth over with the qualities one wants to design the range of the piano keyboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics
    Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics Antoni Malet Daniele Cozzoli Pompeu Fabra University One of the most fascinating intellectual ªgures of the seventeenth century, Marin Mersenne (1588–1648) is well known for his relationships with many outstanding contemporary scholars as well as for his friendship with Descartes. Moreover, his own contributions to natural philosophy have an interest of their own. Mersenne worked on the main scientiªc questions debated in his time, such as the law of free fall, the principles of Galileo’s mechanics, the law of refraction, the propagation of light, the vacuum problem, the hydrostatic paradox, and the Copernican hypothesis. In his Traité de l’Harmonie Universelle (1627), Mersenne listed and de- scribed the mathematical disciplines: Geometry looks at continuous quantity, pure and deprived from matter and from everything which falls upon the senses; arithmetic contemplates discrete quantities, i.e. numbers; music concerns har- monic numbers, i.e. those numbers which are useful to the sound; cosmography contemplates the continuous quantity of the whole world; optics looks at it jointly with light rays; chronology talks about successive continuous quantity, i.e. past time; and mechanics concerns that quantity which is useful to machines, to the making of instruments and to anything that belongs to our works. Some also adds judiciary astrology. However, proofs of this discipline are The papers collected here were presented at the Workshop, “Mersenne and Mixed Mathe- matics,” we organized at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona), 26 May 2006. We are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Education and the Catalan Department of Universities for their ªnancial support through projects Hum2005-05107/FISO and 2005SGR-00929.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physics of Sound 1
    The Physics of Sound 1 The Physics of Sound Sound lies at the very center of speech communication. A sound wave is both the end product of the speech production mechanism and the primary source of raw material used by the listener to recover the speaker's message. Because of the central role played by sound in speech communication, it is important to have a good understanding of how sound is produced, modified, and measured. The purpose of this chapter will be to review some basic principles underlying the physics of sound, with a particular focus on two ideas that play an especially important role in both speech and hearing: the concept of the spectrum and acoustic filtering. The speech production mechanism is a kind of assembly line that operates by generating some relatively simple sounds consisting of various combinations of buzzes, hisses, and pops, and then filtering those sounds by making a number of fine adjustments to the tongue, lips, jaw, soft palate, and other articulators. We will also see that a crucial step at the receiving end occurs when the ear breaks this complex sound into its individual frequency components in much the same way that a prism breaks white light into components of different optical frequencies. Before getting into these ideas it is first necessary to cover the basic principles of vibration and sound propagation. Sound and Vibration A sound wave is an air pressure disturbance that results from vibration. The vibration can come from a tuning fork, a guitar string, the column of air in an organ pipe, the head (or rim) of a snare drum, steam escaping from a radiator, the reed on a clarinet, the diaphragm of a loudspeaker, the vocal cords, or virtually anything that vibrates in a frequency range that is audible to a listener (roughly 20 to 20,000 cycles per second for humans).
    [Show full text]
  • The Musical Kinetic Shape: a Variable Tension String Instrument
    The Musical Kinetic Shape: AVariableTensionStringInstrument Ismet Handˇzi´c, Kyle B. Reed University of South Florida, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tampa, Florida Abstract In this article we present a novel variable tension string instrument which relies on a kinetic shape to actively alter the tension of a fixed length taut string. We derived a mathematical model that relates the two-dimensional kinetic shape equation to the string’s physical and dynamic parameters. With this model we designed and constructed an automated instrument that is able to play frequencies within predicted and recognizable frequencies. This prototype instrument is also able to play programmed melodies. Keywords: musical instrument, variable tension, kinetic shape, string vibration 1. Introduction It is possible to vary the fundamental natural oscillation frequency of a taut and uniform string by either changing the string’s length, linear density, or tension. Most string musical instruments produce di↵erent tones by either altering string length (fretting) or playing preset and di↵erent string gages and string tensions. Although tension can be used to adjust the frequency of a string, it is typically only used in this way for fine tuning the preset tension needed to generate a specific note frequency. In this article, we present a novel string instrument concept that is able to continuously change the fundamental oscillation frequency of a plucked (or bowed) string by altering string tension in a controlled and predicted Email addresses: [email protected] (Ismet Handˇzi´c), [email protected] (Kyle B. Reed) URL: http://reedlab.eng.usf.edu/ () Preprint submitted to Applied Acoustics April 19, 2014 Figure 1: The musical kinetic shape variable tension string instrument prototype.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-Contact
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-contact Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection of Rails: Next Generation Approach A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Structural Engineering by Stefano Mariani Committee in Charge: Professor Francesco Lanza di Scalea, Chair Professor David J. Benson Professor Michael J. Buckingham Professor William S. Hodgkiss Professor Chia-Ming Uang 2015 Copyright, Stefano Mariani, 2015 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Stefano Mariani is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii DEDICATION To Bob iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page iii Dedication iv Table of Contents v List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures xi List of Tables xxii Acknowledgments xxiv Vita xvii Abstract of the Dissertation xxix 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Non Destructive Evaluation of railroad tracks. Introductory discussions and motivations for the research ............................................................................................ 1 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Electroacoustics: Hollywood 1956 – 1963 by Peter T
    A History of Electroacoustics: Hollywood 1956 – 1963 By Peter T. Humphrey A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music and the Designated Emphasis in New Media in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor James Q. Davies, Chair Professor Nicholas de Monchaux Professor Mary Ann Smart Professor Nicholas Mathew Spring 2021 Abstract A History of Electroacoustics: Hollywood 1956 – 1963 by Peter T. Humphrey Doctor of Philosophy in Music and the Designated Emphasis in New Media University of California, Berkeley Professor James Q. Davies, Chair This dissertation argues that a cinematic approach to music recording developed during the 1950s, modeling the recording process of movie producers in post-production studios. This approach to recorded sound constructed an imaginary listener consisting of a blank perceptual space, whose sonic-auditory experience could be controlled through electroacoustic devices. This history provides an audiovisual genealogy for electroacoustic sound that challenges histories of recording that have privileged Thomas Edison’s 1877 phonograph and the recording industry it generated. It is elucidated through a consideration of the use of electroacoustic technologies for music that centered in Hollywood and drew upon sound recording practices from the movie industry. This consideration is undertaken through research in three technologies that underwent significant development in the 1950s: the recording studio, the mixing board, and the synthesizer. The 1956 Capitol Records Studio in Hollywood was the first purpose-built recording studio to be modelled on sound stages from the neighboring film lots. The mixing board was the paradigmatic tool of the recording studio, a central interface from which to direct and shape sound.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Rhythm, Metronomes, and the Mechanization of Musicality
    THE METRONOMIC PERFORMANCE PRACTICE: A HISTORY OF RHYTHM, METRONOMES, AND THE MECHANIZATION OF MUSICALITY by ALEXANDER EVAN BONUS A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Music CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2010 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of _____________________________________________________Alexander Evan Bonus candidate for the ______________________Doctor of Philosophy degree *. Dr. Mary Davis (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) Dr. Daniel Goldmark ________________________________________________ Dr. Peter Bennett ________________________________________________ Dr. Martha Woodmansee ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________2/25/2010 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Copyright © 2010 by Alexander Evan Bonus All rights reserved CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES . ii LIST OF TABLES . v Preface . vi ABSTRACT . xviii Chapter I. THE HUMANITY OF MUSICAL TIME, THE INSUFFICIENCIES OF RHYTHMICAL NOTATION, AND THE FAILURE OF CLOCKWORK METRONOMES, CIRCA 1600-1900 . 1 II. MAELZEL’S MACHINES: A RECEPTION HISTORY OF MAELZEL, HIS MECHANICAL CULTURE, AND THE METRONOME . .112 III. THE SCIENTIFIC METRONOME . 180 IV. METRONOMIC RHYTHM, THE CHRONOGRAPHIC
    [Show full text]