DOCSLIB.ORG

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-Contact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-Contact UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Non-contact Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection of Rails: Next Generation Approach A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Structural Engineering by Stefano Mariani Committee in Charge: Professor Francesco Lanza di Scalea, Chair Professor David J. Benson Professor Michael J. Buckingham Professor William S. Hodgkiss Professor Chia-Ming Uang 2015 Copyright, Stefano Mariani, 2015 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Stefano Mariani is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii DEDICATION To Bob iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page iii Dedication iv Table of Contents v List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures xi List of Tables xxii Acknowledgments xxiv Vita xvii Abstract of the Dissertation xxix 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Non Destructive Evaluation of railroad tracks. Introductory discussions and motivations for the research ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Outline of the numerical and experimental approach of the dissertation ................. 3 2 State of the art review ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Development of structural defects in rails ................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Transverse defects in the rail head .................................................................. 8 2.1.2 Longitudinal defects in the rail head ............................................................. 16 2.1.3 Web defects ................................................................................................... 19 2.1.4 Base defects ................................................................................................... 22 2.1.5 Rolling contact fatigue conditions ................................................................. 23 2.1.6 Defective welds ............................................................................................. 31 2.2 Current rail inspection methods ............................................................................. 32 2.2.1 Historical background ................................................................................... 32 v 2.2.2 Currently used methods ................................................................................. 34 2.3 Ultrasonic guided waves for defect detection in rails ............................................ 41 3 Concepts of the proposed rail defect detection system ............................................... 47 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 47 3.2 Former UCSD rail inspection system based on a hybrid laser/air-coupled configuration ................................................................................................................. 48 3.3 Newly developed rail inspection system solely based on air-coupled transducers 50 3.3.1 Current transducers configuration ................................................................. 50 3.3.2 Alternative transducers configurations tested over the course of the research project ....................................................................................................................... 59 3.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 61 3.5 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................. 62 4 Numerical modeling of ultrasonic guided wave propagation: theoretical fundamentals and application to the rail case .......................................................................................... 63 4.1 Introduction and theoretical fundamentals ............................................................. 63 4.1.1 Ultrasonic waves propagation in an unbounded medium ............................. 66 4.1.2 Guided waves propagation in a bounded medium ........................................ 68 4.2 Local Interaction Simulation Approach (LISA) ..................................................... 76 4.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 76 4.2.2 Proof of concept of the proposed rail defect detection system ...................... 78 4.2.3 Distribution of wave energy on the rail top surface ...................................... 86 4.2.4 Parametric study of the prototype sensitivity to different defect conditions . 99 4.2.4.1 Case I: signals not affected by noise (ideal condition) 109 4.2.4.2 Case II: noise artificially added to the signals (realistic condition) 121 vi 4.2.4.3 Case II: probabilistic analysis through computation of Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (for “high” SNR levels) 139 4.2.4.4 Case II: probabilistic analysis through computation of Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (for “low” SNR levels) 148 4.2.4.5 Case II: comparison with results obtainable using coherent array techniques 154 4.2.5 Future works ................................................................................................ 169 4.3 Finite element analysis of the complete experimental setup using LS-DYNA .... 170 4.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 170 4.3.2 Finite element analysis of the pressure field generated in air by a cylindrically focused air-coupled transmitter .......................................................... 172 4.3.3 Simulation of the complete ultrasonic wave propagation through air and rail . ..................................................................................................................... 186 4.3.4 LS-DYNA aid in the design of a dedicated holder for a newer transmitter 205 4.4 Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 218 4.5 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................ 219 5 Development of the rail inspection prototype ........................................................... 221 5.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 221 5.2 UCSD/FRA Rail Defect Testing Facility ............................................................. 223 5.3 Prototype parts design .......................................................................................... 224 5.4 Electronic hardware layout ................................................................................... 226 5.5 Signal processing techniques employed to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of the acquired waveforms .................................................................................................... 230 5.5.1 Digital filtering techniques (used in former versions of the prototype) ...... 231 5.5.2 Electrical impedance matching networks .................................................... 233 5.6 Statistical algorithm designed to enhance the rail defect detection performance 237 vii 5.6.1 Defect-sensitive features extraction ............................................................ 242 5.7 On the issue affecting higher speed testing performance ..................................... 250 5.8 Field test at Transportation Technology Center ................................................... 256 5.8.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 256 5.8.2 Operational parameters used during the execution of the tests and test site lay-out ..................................................................................................................... 258 5.8.3 Field test timeline ........................................................................................ 261 5.8.4 Field test results: Damage Index traces ....................................................... 263 5.8.5 Field test results: Receiver Operating Characteristic curves ....................... 266 5.8.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................. 270 5.9 Further studies conducted on the field test data ................................................... 271 5.10 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 274 5.11 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................... 276 6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 277 6.1 Review of the dissertation and summary of the results ........................................ 277 6.2 Recommendations for future work ....................................................................... 280 References ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACT Resources for Arts A/V Technology
    Career Cluster: Arts, A/V Technology, & Communications Mathematics in Digital Arts and Design III – Addresses standard 11 Question A graphic designer at a bottling company is tasked with designing efficient packaging for soda cans. Two options are being considered. Which of the two arrangements has less unused space in the package and how does the arrangement compare with the alternative? The radius of a soda can is approximately 3.2 cm. Package A Package B A. Package A; Package A has 16.7% less unused space than Package B. B. Package B; Package B has 16.7% less unused space than Package A. C. Package B; Package B has 8.3% less unused space than Package A. D. Neither; The two packages have equal unused space. Source: Adapted from Zordak, S. E. (n.d.). Soda Cans. Retrieved February 24, 2016, from http://illuminations.nctm.org/Lesson.aspx?id=2363 Office of Career and Technical Education • 710 James Robertson Parkway • Nashville, TN 37243 1 | March 2016 Tel: (615) 532-2830 • tn.gov/education/cte Career Cluster: Arts, A/V Technology, & Communications Science in A/V Production I – Addresses Standard 15 Passage I Natural Science: This passage is adapted from the chapter “The Wave Theory of Sound” in Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications by Allan Pierce. (Acoustical Society of America). Acoustics is the science of sound, including 20 ability, of communication via sound, along with the its production, transmission, and effects. In variety of psychological influences sound has on present usage, the term sound implies not only those who hear it.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Mersenne English Version
    MARIN MERSENNE (September 8, 1588 – September 1, 1648) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany Although no stamp with a portrait of the French mathematician MARIN MERSENNE has yet been issued, the postal administration of the Principality of Liechtenstein took the discovery of the 39th MERSENNE prime number = 13,466,917 − M13,466,9 17 2 1 as an opportunity to select this number as the motif for a stamp of a series on science (the graphic on the stamp below shows a logarithmic spiral). (drawings © Andreas Strick) EUCLID had already dealt with numbers of the type 2n −1 and, among other things, proved the theorem: If 2n −1 is a prime number, then 2n1- ⋅ (2 n − 1) is a perfect number. th Until the end of the 16 century it was believed that all numbers of the type 2n −1 were prime numbers if the exponent n was a prime number. In 1603, the Italian mathematician PIETRO CATALDI, who was also the first to write a treatise on continued fractions, proved the following: If the exponent n is not a prime number, i.e. if it can be represented as the product of n a⋅ b= with a b∈ , IN , then 2n −1 is not a prime number either; because then the number can be broken down into at least two factors: ⋅ − ⋅ 2a b − 12112 =( a −) ⋅( +a + 22 a + 23 a + ...2 + (b 1) a ). He also showed by systematic trial and error with all prime divisors up to the root of the number in question that 217 −1 and 219 −1 are prime numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding a Family of Fiddles
    The four members of the violin family have changed very little In hundreds of years. Recently, a group of musi- cians and scientists have constructed a "new" string family. 16 Founding a Family of Fiddles Carleen M. Hutchins An article from Physics Today, 1967. New measmement techniques combined with recent acoustics research enable us to make vioUn-type instruments in all frequency ranges with the properties built into the vioHn itself by the masters of three centuries ago. Thus for the first time we have a whole family of instruments made according to a consistent acoustical theory. Beyond a doubt they are musically successful by Carleen Maley Hutchins For three or folti centuries string stacles have stood in the way of practi- quartets as well as orchestras both cal accomplishment. That we can large and small, ha\e used violins, now routinely make fine violins in a violas, cellos and contrabasses of clas- variety of frequency ranges is the re- sical design. These wooden instru- siJt of a fortuitous combination: ments were brought to near perfec- violin acoustics research—showing a tion by violin makers of the 17th and resurgence after a lapse of 100 years— 18th centuries. Only recendy, though, and the new testing equipment capa- has testing equipment been good ble of responding to the sensitivities of enough to find out just how they work, wooden instruments. and only recently have scientific meth- As is shown in figure 1, oiu new in- ods of manufactiu-e been good enough struments are tuned in alternate inter- to produce consistently instruments vals of a musical fourth and fifth over with the qualities one wants to design the range of the piano keyboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics
    Mersenne and Mixed Mathematics Antoni Malet Daniele Cozzoli Pompeu Fabra University One of the most fascinating intellectual ªgures of the seventeenth century, Marin Mersenne (1588–1648) is well known for his relationships with many outstanding contemporary scholars as well as for his friendship with Descartes. Moreover, his own contributions to natural philosophy have an interest of their own. Mersenne worked on the main scientiªc questions debated in his time, such as the law of free fall, the principles of Galileo’s mechanics, the law of refraction, the propagation of light, the vacuum problem, the hydrostatic paradox, and the Copernican hypothesis. In his Traité de l’Harmonie Universelle (1627), Mersenne listed and de- scribed the mathematical disciplines: Geometry looks at continuous quantity, pure and deprived from matter and from everything which falls upon the senses; arithmetic contemplates discrete quantities, i.e. numbers; music concerns har- monic numbers, i.e. those numbers which are useful to the sound; cosmography contemplates the continuous quantity of the whole world; optics looks at it jointly with light rays; chronology talks about successive continuous quantity, i.e. past time; and mechanics concerns that quantity which is useful to machines, to the making of instruments and to anything that belongs to our works. Some also adds judiciary astrology. However, proofs of this discipline are The papers collected here were presented at the Workshop, “Mersenne and Mixed Mathe- matics,” we organized at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona), 26 May 2006. We are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Education and the Catalan Department of Universities for their ªnancial support through projects Hum2005-05107/FISO and 2005SGR-00929.
    [Show full text]
  • Music and Science from Leonardo to Galileo International Conference 13-15 November 2020 Organized by Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini, Lucca
    MUSIC AND SCIENCE FROM LEONARDO TO GALILEO International Conference 13-15 November 2020 Organized by Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini, Lucca Keynote Speakers: VICTOR COELHO (Boston University) RUDOLF RASCH (Utrecht University) The present conference has been made possibile with the friendly support of the CENTRO STUDI OPERA OMNIA LUIGI BOCCHERINI www.luigiboccherini.org INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MUSIC AND SCIENCE FROM LEONARDO TO GALILEO Organized by Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini, Lucca Virtual conference 13-15 November 2020 Programme Committee: VICTOR COELHO (Boston University) ROBERTO ILLIANO (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) FULVIA MORABITO (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) RUDOLF RASCH (Utrecht University) MASSIMILIANO SALA (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) ef Keynote Speakers: VICTOR COELHO (Boston University) RUDOLF RASCH (Utrecht University) FRIDAY 13 NOVEMBER 14.45-15.00 Opening • FULVIA MORABITO (Centro Studi Opera Omnia Luigi Boccherini) 15.00-16.00 Keynote Speaker 1: • VICTOR COELHO (Boston University), In the Name of the Father: Vincenzo Galilei as Historian and Critic ef 16.15-18.15 The Galileo Family (Chair: Victor Coelho, Boston University) • ADAM FIX (University of Minnesota), «Esperienza», Teacher of All Things: Vincenzo Galilei’s Music as Artisanal Epistemology • ROBERTA VIDIC (Hochschule für Musik und Theater Hamburg), Galilei and the ‘Radicalization’ of the Italian and German Music Theory • DANIEL MARTÍN SÁEZ (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid), The Galileo Affair through
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Mersenne: Minim Monk and Messenger; Monotheism, Mathematics, and Music
    Marin Mersenne: Minim Monk and Messenger; Monotheism, Mathematics, and Music Karl-Dieter Crisman (Gordon College) Karl-Dieter Crisman is Professor of Mathematics at Gordon Col- lege, but first heard of Mersenne in both math and music courses as an undergraduate at Northwestern University. His main scholarly work focuses on open software resources for mathematics, and the mathematics of voting. He is certain Mersenne would see as many connections between those topics and faith as he did with the math of music and physics. Abstract Marin Mersenne is one of many names in the history of mathematics known more by a couple of key connections than for their overall life and accomplishments. Anyone familiar with number theory has heard of ‘Mersenne primes’, which even occasionally appear in broader media when a new (and enormous) one is discovered. Instructors delving into the history of calculus a bit may know of him as the interlocutor who drew Fermat, Descartes, and others out to discuss their methods of tangents (and more). In most treatments, these bare facts are all one would learn about him. But who was Mersenne, what did he actually do, and why? This paper gives a brief introduction to some important points about his overall body of work, using characteristic examples from his first major work to demonstrate them. We’ll especially look into why a monk from an order devoted to being the least of all delved so deeply into (among other things) exploratory math- ematics, practical acoustics, and defeating freethinkers, and why that might be of importance today. 1 Introduction The seventeenth century was a time of ferment in the sciences in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • From My Notebooks, 1975-81 Arnold Dreyblatt Proposition IX: to Explain
    From My Notebooks, 1975-81 Arnold Dreyblatt Proposition IX: To explain why an open string when sounded makes many sounds at once. Proposition XV: To determine whether it is possible to touch the strings of an instrument or their keys so fast that the ear cannot discern whether the sound is composed of different sounds, or if it is unique and continuous. - Marin Mersenne, Harmonie Universelle, 1637 My work in image and sound synthesis in the early seventies initiated an interest in the interactions of waveform signal events an their hearing in the audio range, as sound , on acoustic instruments and finally, as music. Having neither a traditional music training or childhood indoctrination in this or that cultural scale or system I have found it convenient to apply my background in experimenting with electronic sound and image to composition with acoustic instruments: utilizing a tuning system derived from the harmonic series in lieu of traditional musical content. The revolution in music language description of the last twenty years has evolved through the construction and re-thinking of music making tools and the resultant intimacy which has been re-established with acoustic dynamics and properties of sound. I have begun to see the development of western music resulting in an aberration. The relative standardization and specialization in notation, instrumental construction and tuning is a situation heretofore unparalleled in the incredibly diverse music cultures of the world. Equal Temperament and the gradual shift towards atonality represent a gradual disregard of the basic acoustic model. Technical improvements to satisfy the needs of chromaticism and loudness have distanced the modern music maker and listener from the basic acoustic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E
    FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Principles Of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E. Stern Forgach PRINCIPLES OF ACOUSTICS Andrés Porta Contreras Department of Physics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Catalina E. Stern Forgach Department of Physics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Keywords: Acoustics, Ear, Diffraction, Doppler effect, Music, Sound, Standing Waves, Ultrasound, Vibration, Waves. Contents 1. Introduction 2. History 3. Basic Concepts 3.1. What is Sound? 3.2. Characteristics of a Wave 3.3. Qualities of Sound 3.3.1. Loudness 3.3.2. Pitch 3.3.3. Timbre 3.4. Mathematical Description of a Pure Sound Wave 3.5. Doppler Effect 3.6. Reflection and Refraction 3.7. Superposition and Interference 3.8. Standing Waves 3.9. Timbre, Modes and Harmonics 3.10. Diffraction 4. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Sound 4.1. Anatomy and Physiology of Hearing. 4.1.1. Outer Ear 4.1.2. Middle Ear 4.1.3. Inner Ear 5. ApplicationsUNESCO – EOLSS 5.1. Ultrasound 5.2. Medicine 5.3. Noise Control 5.4. MeteorologySAMPLE and Seismology CHAPTERS 5.5. Harmonic Synthesis 5.6. Acoustical Architecture and Special Building Rooms Design 5.7. Speech and Voice 5.8. Recording and Reproduction 5.9. Other Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Principles Of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E. Stern Forgach Summary The chapter begins with a brief history of acoustics from Pythagoras to the present times. Then the main physical and mathematical principles on acoustics are reviewed. A general description of waves is given first, then the characteristics of sound and some of the most common phenomena related to acoustics like echo, diffraction and the Doppler effect are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Different Parameters of Architectural Buildings
    IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 6, Issue 2 Ver. III (Mar-Apr. 2014), PP 01-06 www.iosrjournals.org An Analysis of Different Parameters of Architectural Buildings Neetu Bargoti 1, A. K. Srivastava2 1Research Scholar, Dr.C.V.Raman University Kota, Bilaspur 2Prof. & Head, Dr.C.V.Raman University Kota, Bilaspur Abstract: Today much importance is given to the acoustical buildings. It plays an important role in creating an acoustically pleasing environment. In this paper an attempt has been given to analysis of different parameters of architectural buildings. Before 1900 A.D. there was no basis of the design of rooms and balls for huge gatherings because the causes of bad hearing were not known to them. In ancient and medieval periods the designs of buildings like Bhuvneshwar temple , Taj Mahal and St. Paul’s Cathedral in London etc. in which sound produced kept on reverberating for a pretty long period, were looked upon with an eye of awe, reverence and a piece of admiration and appreciation. On July 30, 2013 devotes caught in a stampede near Baidyanath Dham, on July 15, 1996 Pilgrims died at the Mahakaleshwar Temple Ujjain, & incident of Uphar Cinema Hall;, June 13,1997 it was totally ignorance of acoustics. This paper describes how the materials like fibre type, fibre size, material thickness, density, airflow resistance and porosity can affect the architectural buildings. At last all the relevant parameters of architectural buildings have been discussed comprehensively. Key words: acoustics, architectural, reverberation, porosity, air flow resistance. I. Introduction Architectural buildings are related with acoustics.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 5A: Mersenne's Laws & Melde's Experiment
    CSUEB Physics 1780 Lab 5a: Mersenne & Melde Page 1 Lab 5a: Mersenne’s Laws & Melde's experiment Introduction Vincenzo Galilei (1520 –1591), the father of Galileo Galilei, was an Italian lutenist, composer, and music theorist. It is reported that he showed that the pitch of a vibrating string was proportional to the square root of its tension. In other words, in order to increase the pitch by an octave (factor of 2 in frequency) it would require the tension to be quadrupled. Marin Mersenne (1588-1648, see picture), often called the “father of acoustics” , around 1630 published a book summarizing the properties of sound, based on the earlier work of Vincenzo and Galileo. He established that: • Frequency is inversely proportional to length of string • Frequency is inversely proportional to the diameter of the string • Frequency is proportional to the root of the tension • Frequency is inversely proportional to the root of the mass (density) of the string. So in summary, if you want a low note, use a fat (massive) long string under low tension. For a high pitch, use a thin short string under high tension. We can summarize all of his results with a single equation showing that the frequency “f” is proportional to: 1 F f ∝ , (1) L µ where “L” is the length of the violin string, “F” is the tension (in Newtons of force) and µ (“mu”) is the mass density of the string (in units of mass per unit length, e.g. kg per meter). In this experiment the string is assumed to be vibrating in its “fundamental” mode, like this, (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Mathematics on the Art and Science of Acoustic Instruments
    Musical Mathematics on the art and science of acoustic instruments Cris Forster MUSICAL MATHEMATICS ON THE ART AND SCIENCE OF ACOUSTIC INSTRUMENTS MUSICAL MATHEMATICS ON THE ART AND SCIENCE OF ACOUSTIC INSTRUMENTS Text and Illustrations by Cris Forster Copyright © 2010 by Cristiano M.L. Forster All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available. ISBN: 978-0-8118-7407-6 Manufactured in the United States. All royalties from the sale of this book go directly to the Chrysalis Foundation, a public 501(c)3 nonprofit arts and education foundation. https://chrysalis-foundation.org Photo Credits: Will Gullette, Plates 1–12, 14–16. Norman Seeff, Plate 13. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Chronicle Books LLC 680 Second Street San Francisco, California 94107 www.chroniclebooks.com In Memory of Page Smith my enduring teacher And to Douglas Monsour our constant friend I would like to thank the following individuals and foundations for their generous contributions in support of the writing, designing, and typesetting of this work: Peter Boyer and Terry Gamble-Boyer The family of Jackson Vanfleet Brown Thomas Driscoll and Nancy Quinn Marie-Louise Forster David Holloway Jack Jensen and Cathleen O’Brien James and Deborah Knapp Ariano Lembi, Aidan and Yuko Fruth-Lembi Douglas and Jeanne Monsour Tim O’Shea and Peggy Arent Fay and Edith Strange Charles and Helene Wright Ayrshire Foundation Chrysalis Foundation The jewel that we find, we stoop and take’t, Because we see it; but what we do not see We tread upon, and never think of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday Morning, 6 May 2014 555 A/B, 8:15 A.M
    TUESDAY MORNING, 6 MAY 2014 555 A/B, 8:15 A.M. TO 11:55 A.M. Session 2aAA Architectural Acoustics: Uncertainty in Describing Room Acoustics Properties I Lily M. Wang, Cochair Durham School of Architectural Eng. and Construction, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S. 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182-0816 Ingo B. Witew, Cochair Inst. of Techn. Acoust., RWTH Aachen Univ., Neustrasse 50, Aachen 52066, Germany Chair’s Introduction—8:15 Invited Papers 2a TUE. AM 8:20 2aAA1. Review of the role of uncertainties in room acoustics. Ralph T. Muehleisen (Decision and Information Sci., Argonne National Lab., 9700 S. Cass Ave., Bldg. 221, Lemont, IL 60439, [email protected]) While many aspects of room acoustics such as material characterization, acoustic propagation and room interaction, and perception have long been, and continue to be, active areas of room acoustics research, the study of uncertainty in room acoustics has been very limited. Uncertainty pervades the room acoustic problem: there is uncertainty in measurement and characterization of materials, uncer- tainty in the models used for propagation and room interaction, uncertainty in the measurement of sound within rooms, and uncertainty in perception. Only recently are the standard methods of uncertainty assessment being systematically employed within room acoustics. This paper explains the need for systematic study of uncertainty in room acoustic predictions and review some of the most recent research related to characterizing uncertainty in room acoustics. 8:40 2aAA2. Uncertainty and stochastic computations in outdoor sound propagation. D. Keith Wilson (CRREL, U.S. Army ERDC, 72 Lyme Rd., Hanover, NH 03755-1290, [email protected]) and Chirs L.
    [Show full text]