DOCSLIB.ORG

The World Factbook Middle East :: Iran Introduction :: Iran Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The World Factbook Middle East :: Iran Introduction :: Iran Background: Known as Persia until 1935, Iran became an Islamic republic in 1979 after the ruling monarchy was overthrown and Shah Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI was forced into exile. Conservative clerical forces led by Ayatollah Ruhollah KHOMEINI established a theocratic system of government with ultimate political authority vested in a learned religious scholar referred to commonly as the Supreme Leader who, according to the constitution, is accountable only to the Assembly of Experts - a popularly elected 86-member body of clerics. US-Iranian relations became strained when a group of Iranian students seized the US Embassy in Tehran in November 1979 and held embassy personnel hostages until mid-January 1981. The US cut off diplomatic relations with Iran in April 1980. During the period 1980-88, Iran fought a bloody, indecisive war with Iraq that eventually expanded into the Persian Gulf and led to clashes between US Navy and Iranian military forces. Iran has been designated a state sponsor of terrorism for its activities in Lebanon and elsewhere in the world and remains subject to US, UN, and EU economic sanctions and export controls because of its continued involvement in terrorism and concerns over possible military dimensions of its nuclear program. Following the election of reformer Hojjat ol-Eslam Mohammad KHATAMI as president in 1997 and a reformist Majles (legislature) in 2000, a campaign to foster political reform in response to popular dissatisfaction was initiated. The movement floundered as conservative politicians, supported by the Supreme Leader, unelected institutions of authority like the Council of Guardians, and the security services reversed and blocked reform measures while increasing security repression. Starting with nationwide municipal elections in 2003 and continuing through Majles elections in 2004, conservatives reestablished control over Iran's elected government institutions, which culminated with the August 2005 inauguration of hardliner Mahmud AHMADI-NEJAD as president. His controversial reelection in June 2009 sparked nationwide protests over allegations of electoral fraud. These protests were quickly suppressed, and the political opposition that arouse as a consequence of AHMADI-NEJAD's election was repressed. Deteriorating economic conditions due primarily to government mismanagement and international sanctions prompted at least two major economically based protests in July and October 2012, but Iran's internal security situation remained stable. President AHMADI-NEJAD's independent streak angered regime establishment figures, including the Supreme Leader, leading to conservative opposition to his agenda for the last year of his presidency, and an alienation of his political supporters. In June 2013 Iranians elected a moderate conservative cleric, Dr. Hasan Fereidun RUHANI to the presidency. He is a long-time senior member in the regime, but has made promises of reforming society and Iran's foreign policy. The UN Security Council has passed a number of resolutions calling for Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities and comply with its IAEA obligations and responsibilities, but in November 2013 the five permanent members, plus Germany, (P5+1) signed a joint plan with Iran to provide the country with incremental relief from international pressure for positive steps toward transparency of their nuclear program. Geography :: Iran Location: Middle East, bordering the Gulf of Oman, the Persian Gulf, and the Caspian Sea, between Iraq and Pakistan Geographic coordinates: 32 00 N, 53 00 E Map references: Middle East Area: total: 1,648,195 sq km country comparison to the world: 18 land: 1,531,595 sq km water: 116,600 sq km Area - comparative: almost two and a half times the size of Teas; slightly smaller than Alaska Land boundaries: total: 5,440 km border countries: Afghanistan 936 km, Armenia 35 km, Azerbaijan-proper 432 km, Azerbaijan-Naxcivan exclave 179 km, Iraq 1,458 km, Pakistan 909 km, Turkey 499 km, Turkmenistan 992 km Coastline: 2,440 km; note - Iran also borders the Caspian Sea (740 km) Maritime claims: territorial sea: 12 nm contiguous zone: 24 nm exclusive economic zone: bilateral agreements or median lines in the Persian Gulf continental shelf: natural prolongation Climate: mostly arid or semiarid, subtropical along Caspian coast Terrain: rugged, mountainous rim; high, central basin with deserts, mountains; small, discontinuous plains along both coasts Elevation extremes: lowest point: Caspian Sea -28 m highest point: Kuh-e Damavand 5,671 m Natural resources: petroleum, natural gas, coal, chromium, copper, iron ore, lead, manganese, zinc, sulfur Land use: arable land: 10.05% permanent crops: 1.08% other: 88.86% (2011) Irrigated land: 87,000 sq km (2009) Total renewable water resources: 137 cu km (2011) Freshwater withdrawal (domestic/industrial/agricultural): total: 93.3 cu km/yr (7%/1%/92%) per capita: 1,306 cu m/yr (2004) Natural hazards: periodic droughts, floods; dust storms, sandstorms; earthquakes Environment - current issues: air pollution, especially in urban areas, from vehicle emissions, refinery operations, and industrial effluents; deforestation; overgrazing; desertification; oil pollution in the Persian Gulf; wetland losses from drought; soil degradation (salination); inadequate supplies of potable water; water pollution from raw sewage and industrial waste; urbanization Environment - international agreements: party to: Biodiversity, Climate Change, Climate Change-Kyoto Protocol, Desertification, Endangered Species, Hazardous Wastes, Marine Dumping, Ozone Layer Protection, Ship Pollution, Wetlands signed, but not ratified: Environmental Modification, Law of the Sea, Marine Life Conservation Geography - note: strategic location on the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, which are vital maritime pathways for crude oil transport People and Society :: Iran Nationality: noun: Iranian(s) adjective: Iranian Ethnic groups: Persian 61%, Azeri 16%, Kurd 10%, Lur 6%, Baloch 2%, Arab 2%, Turkmen and Turkic tribes 2%, other 1% Languages: Persian (official) 53%, Azeri Turkic and Turkic dialects 18%, Kurdish 10%, Gilaki and Mazandarani 7%, Luri 6%, Balochi 2%, Arabic 2%, other 2% Religions: Muslim (official) 99.4% (Shia 90-95%, Sunni 5-10%), other (includes Zoroastrian, Jewish, and Christian) 0.3%, unspecified 0.4% (2011 est.) Population: 80,840,713 (July 2014 est.) country comparison to the world: 19 Age structure: 0-14 years: 23.7% (male 9,834,866/female 9,350,017) 15-24 years: 18.7% (male 7,757,256/female 7,341,309) 25-54 years: 46.1% (male 18,955,874/female 18,289,849) 55-64 years: 5.2% (male 2,519,630/female 2,603,458) 65 years and over: 5.1% (male 1,941,692/female 2,246,762) (2014 est.) Dependency ratios: total dependency ratio: 41 % youth dependency ratio: 33.6 % elderly dependency ratio: 7.5 % potential support ratio: 13.4 (2013) Median age: total: 28.3 years male: 28 years female: 28.6 years (2014 est.) Population growth rate: 1.22% (2014 est.) country comparison to the world: 97 Birth rate: 18.23 births/1,000 population (2014 est.) country comparison to the world: 105 Death rate: 5.94 deaths/1,000 population (2014 est.) country comparison to the world: 169 Net migration rate: -0.08 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2014 est.) country comparison to the world: 115 Urbanization: urban population: 69.1% of total population (2011) rate of urbanization: 1.25% annual rate of change (2010-15 est.) Major urban areas - population: TEHRAN (capital) 7.19 million; Mashhad 2.592 million; Esfahan 1.704 million; Karaj 1.531 million; Tabriz 1.459 million (2009) Sex ratio: at birth: 1.05 male(s)/female 0-14 years: 1.05 male(s)/female 15-24 years: 1.06 male(s)/female 25-54 years: 1.04 male(s)/female 55-64 years: 1.03 male(s)/female 65 years and over: 0.89 male(s)/female total population: 1.03 male(s)/female (2014 est.) Maternal mortality rate: 21 deaths/100,000 live births (2010) country comparison to the world: 137 Infant mortality rate: total: 39 deaths/1,000 live births country comparison to the world: 55 male: 39.53 deaths/1,000 live births female: 38.45 deaths/1,000 live births (2014 est.) Life expectancy at birth: total population: 70.89 years country comparison to the world: 148 male: 69.32 years female: 72.53 years (2014 est.) Total fertility rate: 1.85 children born/woman (2014 est.) country comparison to the world: 146 Contraceptive prevalence rate: 73.3% (2002) Health expenditures: 6% of GDP (2011) country comparison to the world: 110 Physicians density: 0.89 physicians/1,000 population (2005) Hospital bed density: 1.7 beds/1,000 population (2009) Drinking water source: improved: urban: 97.5% of population rural: 90.3% of population total: 95.3% of population unimproved: urban: 2.5% of population rural: 9.7% of population total: 4.7% of population (2011 est.) Sanitation facility access: improved: urban: 100% of population rural: 98.7% of population total: 99.6% of population unimproved: urban: 0% of population rural: 1.3% of population total: 0.4% of population (2011 est.) HIV/AIDS - adult prevalence rate: 0.2% (2012 est.) country comparison to the world: 102 HIV/AIDS - people living with HIV/AIDS: 70,900 (2012 est.) country comparison to the world: 54 HIV/AIDS - deaths: 4,600 (2012 est.) country comparison to the world: 43 Major infectious diseases: degree of risk: intermediate food or waterborne diseases: bacterial diarrhea vectorborne diseases: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever note: highly pathogenic H5N1 avian
Recommended publications
  • The Iranian Regime and the New Political Challenge

    The Iranian Regime and the New Political Challenge

    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org June 2011 ~MIDDLE EAST MEDIA MONITOR~ AN ENEMY FROM WITHIN: THE IRANIAN REGIME AND THE NEW POLITICAL CHALLENGE By Raz Zimmt Middle East Media Monitor is an FPRI E-Note series, designed to review once a month a current topic from the perspective of the foreign language press in such countries as Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Turkey. These articles will focus on providing FPRI’s readership with an inside view on how some of the most important countries in the Middle East are covering issues of importance to the American foreign policy community. Raz Zimmt is a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate School of Historical Studies and a research fellow at the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University. He is the editor of the weekly “Spotlight on Iran,” published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, www.terrorism-info.org.il/site/home/default.asp . On May 11, 2011 hardliner cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, held a meeting with members of the conservative Islamic Coalition Party. Mesbah-Yazdi warned his audience against the strengthening of deviant religious thought in Iranian society. He claimed that it jeopardizes the concept of “the Guardianship of the Islamic jurist” ( Velayat-e Faqih ), upon which the Iranian regime has been based since the Islamic Revolution (1979). “If this current continues and one day we will see another Seyyed Ali Mohammad Bab 1...we should not be surprised.” 2 A few days later, Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Sa’idi, the Friday prayer leader in Qom, warned the “deviant currents” to stop their conspiracies or the people will annihilate them, as they did to [Abolhassan] Banisadr, 3 “the hypocrites” [a reference to Iranian opposition organization, the Mojahedin-e Khalq ] and “the leaders of the sedition” [a reference to the reformist opposition].
  • Background Paper on Refugees and Asylum Seekers from Iran

    Background Paper on Refugees and Asylum Seekers from Iran

    NATIONS UNIES UNITED NATIONS HAUT COMMISSARIAT HIGH COMMISSIONER POUR LES REFUGIES FOR REFUGEES BACKGROUND PAPER ON REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM IRAN UNHCR CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION ON REFUGEES GENEVA, OCTOBER 1995 THIS INFORMATION PAPER WAS PREPARED IN THE COUNTRY INFORMATION UNIT OF THE CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION ON REFUGEES ON THE BASIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND COMMENT, AND IN COLLABORATION WITH THE UNHCR STATISTICS UNIT. ALL SOURCES ARE CITED. THIS PAPER IS NOT, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE, FULLY EXHAUSTIVE WITH REGARD TO CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRY SURVEYED, OR CONCLUSIVE AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY PARTICULAR CLAIM TO REFUGEE STATUS OR ASYLUM. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Asylum Seekers in Europe 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Overall Trends in Asylum Applications 3 1.3 Trends in Convention Status Recognition 4 1.4 Trends in Non-Convention Recognitions 4 1.5 Iranian Refugees and Asylum Seekers 4 1.6 Trends in Iranian Convention Status Recognitions 5 1.7 Trends in Iranians Allowed to Remain for Humanitarian Reasons 5 2. Iranians in Neighboring Countries 6 3. Internal Situation in Iran 6 3.1 Recent Developments 6 3.2 Iranian Security Forces 8 3.3 Political Parties 10 4. Human Rights Concerns 13 4.1 International and National Legal Framework 13 4.2 General Respect for Human Rights 14 4.3 The Situation of Ethnic Minorities 18 4.4 The Situation of Religious Minorities 21 4.5 The Situation of Women 25 Bibliography 27 2 1. REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS IN EUROPE 1.1 Introduction This section provides a statistical overview of refugees and asylum-seekers in Western Europe1 in general and of refugees and asylum-seekers from Iran in particular.
  • US Foreign Policy and Its Perspectives on Revolutionary Iran

    US Foreign Policy and Its Perspectives on Revolutionary Iran

    A Fleeting, Forgotten, Modus Vivendi: U.S. Foreign Policy and its Perspectives on Revolutionary Iran Before the Hostage Crisis of 1979 By Nathan Eckman Senior Thesis Spring 2018 Columbia University Department of History Seminar Advisor: Matthew Connelly Faculty Advisor: Peter Awn Table of Contents 2 Preface & Acknowledgments 3 Introduction 11 Chapter One: America, The Arbiter January – December, 1978 25 Chapter Two: “The Islamic Movement Will Squander” January – April, 1979 42 Chapter Three: Dawn in Qom, Dusk in Tehran May – November, 1979 54 Conclusion 60 Bibliography Eckman 1 Preface & Acknowledgments Four years ago I was in the Middle East wearing Marine Corps combat utilities. The men I trained beside, the seas and straits my ship traveled through, and the lands my platoon traversed illuminated the complexity and richness of the Middle East as a whole. I became fascinated with the region’s history and the United States’ involvement in it. It was also then that I decided to study the region whenever and wherever I went to school. Even then, due in part to its mysterious image and rogue-classification, I knew Iran must be the topic of my studies. So to begin, I must thank Columbia University and its History Department for providing me the opportunity to make my intellectual aspirations a reality. My years at this institution have challenged me on nearly every front and simultaneously given me the autonomy to find answers for myself. This, of course, is possible only because of the people that are the fabric of this great institution. It is tempting to list every man and woman who helped me along this journey.
  • The Left Movement and National Question: from Romanticism to Realism (With a Focus on Komala Organization)

    The Left Movement and National Question: from Romanticism to Realism (With a Focus on Komala Organization)

    Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2016 2016, Vol. 3, No. 1, 20-48 ISSN: 2149-1291 The Left Movement and National Question: From Romanticism to Realism (With a Focus on Komala Organization) Sabah Mofidi1 Scientific-Applied University, Sine (Sanandaj), Kurdistan, Iran This article studies the ‘national question’and its importance in the Left thought and movement from a realistic and pragmatic perspective. It elaborates that during the history of this movement, the nationalistic reading on the Left thought, even in popular socialist countries, led to confiscating Marxism in favor ofthe nationalistic interests, though it apparently emphasized on the internationalist slogans. Also it draws on the fact thatthe theoreticians and pragmatic Marxist leaders of each country, subject to conditions and priorities, had a special interpretation of Marxism. In some third world countries, theoppressed nations’ nationalistic desires have been condemned by the Left organizations of the dominant nations as deviation from Marxism and to trivialize the national question. This climate affected some Kurdish Left parties in a way that at first they followed the romantic and idealistic leftists of the nations who don’t have the national question, but afterward with awareness of their theoretical and political mistakes, they tried to distance themselves from them and moved towards realism. So, the author seeks to answer, whysuch a thing happened and what its effects on the Kurdistan politics have been. Toward this end, the article in the different parts examines the importance of the national question and nationalism in the Marxist theories, the Left movement in Iran and Kurdistan in general, and Komala-Kurdistan Toilers Revolutionary Organization of Iran in particular.
  • Explanation and Critique of the Iranian Reform Movement: Alternative

    Explanation and Critique of the Iranian Reform Movement: Alternative

    Explanation and Critique of the Iranian Reform Movement: Alternative Discourses for a Conservative Regime Ali Namatpour Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Political Science Bettina Koch, Chair Timothy Luke Rachel Scott May 5, 2016 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: Islamic government, Reform movement, religious Intellectual Copyright 2016, Ali Namatpour Explanation and Critique of the Iranian Reform Movement: Alternative Discourses for a Conservative Regime Ali Namatpour Abstract This thesis analyzes the failures, achievements, and some of the possible political ramifications of the reform movement in Iran since the Islamic Revolution. It focuses on religious intellectual discourse in the context of the intellectual trajectory of Islamic thought from the revolutionary period to the post-revolutionary reformist phase. This thesis examines the role of the post- revolutionary intellectuals after the death of Ayatollah Khomeini. For reaching this goal, this research presents an analysis of the historical processes which resulted in the formation and growth of the religious intellectuals in Iran. The thesis begins by explaining the basis of Shia political thought and its growth trend which leads to the theory of velayate faqih as the main response to the question of the political legitimacy in Shia doctrine. I argue the emergence of the reformist ideas related to the decline of the revolutionary model of the Islamic government, which dominated the decade after the revolution. I discuss how the reformists and the religious intellectuals challenge the socio-economic and the political hegemony of the Islamic government.
  • Discursive Continuity of Political Nationalism As a Form of Opposition Politics in Modern Iran

    Discursive Continuity of Political Nationalism As a Form of Opposition Politics in Modern Iran

    DISCURSIVE CONTINUITY OF POLITICAL NATIONALISM AS A FORM OF OPPOSITION POLITICS IN MODERN IRAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY PINAR ARIKAN SİNKAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SEPTEMBER 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. İhsan Dağı (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zana Çitak Aytürk (METU, IR) Asst. Prof. Dr. Derya Göçer Akder (METU, ARS) Assoc. Prof. Dr. İlker Aytürk (BİLKENT, POLS) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Pınar Arıkan Sinkaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT DISCURSIVE CONTINUITY OF POLITICAL NATIONALISM AS A FORM OF OPPOSITION POLITICS IN MODERN IRAN Arıkan Sinkaya, Pınar Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık September 2015, 392 pages The dissertation examines political nationalism as a transformative power of modern Iranian politics at the societal level through historical-sociological study of four mass opposition movements, which are the Constitutional Movement (1906-11), National Front Movement (1949-53), Iranian Revolution Movement (1978-79), and Green Movement (2009).
  • POWER VERSUS CHOICE Human Rights and Parliamentary Elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran

    POWER VERSUS CHOICE Human Rights and Parliamentary Elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran

    Iran Page 1 of 10 March 1996 Vol. 8, No. 1 (E) IRAN POWER VERSUS CHOICE Human Rights and Parliamentary Elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran SUMMARY Iranians will vote on March 8, 1996, to elect 270 members of the parliament, or Majles, in an election process that severely limits citizen participation. Parliamentary elections could represent a real contest for power in Iran's political system-but only if arbitrary bans on candidates and other constraints on political life are lifted. As the campaign period opened on March 1, the government-appointed Council of Guardians had excluded some 44 percent of the more than 5,000 candidates on the basis of discriminatory and arbitrary criteria, significantly impairing access to the political process and citizens' freedom of choice. The council vetoed candidates by calling into question such matters as their commitment to the political system, their loyalty, and their "practical adherence to Islam," or their support for the principle of rule by the pre-eminent religious jurist (velayat-e faqih). At the invitation of the Iranian government, Human Rights Watch was able to travel to Iran in early 1996 to investigate and discuss the human rights dimension of Iran's political process, and in particular the guarantees and restraints placed upon international standards of freedom of expression, association and assembly during the pre-election period. During this unprecedented three-week mission Human Rights Watch/Middle East interviewed dozens of political activists, lawyers, parliamentarians, writers, journalists, senior European diplomats and government officials in Tehran and Isfahan. Although denied permission to visit the city of Qom, where leading clerical critics of the government are imprisoned, Human Rights Watch was otherwise allowed broad access, including a private meeting with one of the longest-term political prisoners still in detention, former Deputy Prime Minister Abbas Amir Entezam.
  • Iran: a Revolutionary Republic in Transition

    Iran: a Revolutionary Republic in Transition

    Iran: a revolutionary republic in transition in republic a revolutionary Iran: This Chaillot Paper examines recent domestic developments in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The volume presents an in-depth assessment of the far- reaching changes that the Iranian state and Iranian society have undergone since the 1979 revolution, with a particular focus on the social and political turmoil of the past five years. IRAN: It is clear that in many ways the Islamic Republic is in the throes of a transition A REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLIC where many of its fundamental tenets are being called into question. Profound and ongoing internal transformations in Iranian society already affect the country’s foreign policy posture, as some of its domestic and external issues IN TRANSITION converge and will most likely continue to do so. Pertinent examples are the nuclear issue and the socio-political upheaval in neighbouring Arab countries. Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi, the volume features contributions from five authors who are all specialists in various aspects of Iranian politics and society. Each Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi by RouzbehEdited Parsi Chaillot Papers | February 2012 author explores some of the most crucial variables of the Iranian body politic. Their focus on distinct dimensions of Iranian society and culture casts light on the changes afoot in contemporary Iran and how the political elite controlling the state respond to these challenges. ISBN 978-92-9198-198-4 published by phone: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 30 ISSN 1017-7566 the European Union fax: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 31 QN-AA-12-128-EN-C Institute for Security Studies e-mail: [email protected] doi:10.2815/27423 100, avenue de Suffren www.iss.europa.eu PAPER CHAILLOT 75015 Paris - France 128 128 CHAILLOT PAPERS BOOKS In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) became an 127 120 2010 QUELLE DÉFENSE EUROPÉENNE autonomous Paris-based agency of the European Union.
  • The Middle East Institute Viewpoints Iran's March 14, 2008 Majlis Elections

    The Middle East Institute Viewpoints Iran's March 14, 2008 Majlis Elections

    The Middle East Institute Viewpoints No. 5 March 2008 Viewpoints are a moderated dialogue between experts expressing opposing or differing opinions on a topic of contemporary relevance Iran’s March 14, 2008 Majlis Elections Speaking of the need for an opposition party, Kemal Ataturk once said: “I do not want to be recorded in history as the man who bequeathed a tyranny.” These words could also be uttered by Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah ‘Ali Khamene’i. Yet, the legacy that ‘Ali Khamene’i will leave behind can perhaps best be described as a promenade of contradictory truths. Such contradictions are emblematic of the 8th round of Iranian parliamentary (Majlis) elections that are now upon us. It is true that the Iranian state employs a prodigious style of electoral engineering to regiment outcomes. But it is also true that the circulation of elites happens mainly at the bottom of the Iranian political pyramid. Therefore, it is important to follow closely the process of elite maneuvering and circulation at the level of parliamentarians. The two essays presented in this edition of Viewpoints capture the above salient points. Dr. Fatemeh Haghighatjoo, a reformist member of the 6th Majlis, maintains that the hardnosed vetting (i.e., disqualification) of the candidates and other typical electoral irregularities/vio- Mehrzad Boroujerdi lations have made the entire process superfluous. She suggests that to keep these trends in check there is need for oversight of the electoral process by the international community. On the other side, Dr. Farideh Farhi, a keen observer of Iranian politics, emphasizes the robust competition among various political groups and points out the significance of their cleavages and corresponding electoral strategies.
  • The Failure of Mehdi Bazargan How the Revolutionary Council, The

    The Failure of Mehdi Bazargan How the Revolutionary Council, The

    The Failure of Mehdi Bazargan How the Revolutionary Council, the Clerical Oligarchy, and United States Foreign Policy Undermined the Liberal Democracy of Iran in 1979 by Christopher Ramsey B.A. in History, May 2012, Western Kentucky University M.A in History, August, 2016, The George Washington University A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts August 31, 2016 Thesis directed by Muriel Atkin Professor of History © Copyright 2016 by Christopher Ramsey All rights reserved ii The author wishes to dedicate this work to Kayla; my bride, my advocate, and my best friend. iii Acknowledgments The author wishes to thank the professors at the George Washington University for their guidance, wisdom, and dedication to their work, both in the classroom and in their respective fields. I arrived at GW overwhelmed by the expectations ahead of me, but left with confidence, thanks in large part to the lessons accrued in your classrooms. Doctors Adam Howard, Muriel Atkins, J. Furman Daniels III, Benjamin Hopkins, Greg Brazinsky, Shira Robinson, Shervin Malekzadeh, Marcy Norton, and Dina Khoury, as well as Ambassador James Jeffrey, thank you all. I would also like to thank my professors at Western Kentucky University, especially Doctors Carol Crowe-Carraco, Scott Girdner, Ingrid Lilly, and Juan Romero, for helping to set me on this path. I also need to thank two teachers who impacted me in my youth: Tony Kleem and the late Kim Dearborn Brickman. As one of my favorite teachers in high school, Mr.
  • Islamic Coalition Party Jami'at-E Mo'talefeh-Ye Islami - JMI

    Islamic Coalition Party Jami'at-E Mo'talefeh-Ye Islami - JMI

    Islamic Coalition Party Jami'at-e Mo'talefeh-ye Islami - JMI The Islamic Coalition Party (Jami‘at-e Mo’talefeh-ye Islami - JMI ) was founded in the early 1960s with the unification of three traditional religious associations representing the interests of the “bazaar.” The bazaar is not only a workplace but also a mercantile traditional lifestyle. Mo’talefeh's members were followers of Ayatollah Khomeini invested in building up Khomeini's claims to the marja'iyya (i.e. to be considered a source of emulation for Shiite followers - the highest religious authority). Mo’talefeh was also the first group that took taqlid as a basis for political (as opposed to religious). The group was very active in the uprising of 1963 when Khomeini opposed the modernization policies of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. It mobilized the traditional segments of society in opposition to the Shah. Mo’talefeh was also involved in armed attacks. For instance, Mohammad Bokharai, a member of the party, assassinated Hasan Ali Mansur, the Iranian prime minister in 1964. When Khomeini was in exile, Mo’talefeh made copies of his statements and tapes and disseminated them throughout Iran. Many of the members of Mo’talefeh were sentenced to jail between 1962 and 1977. During the revolution, they were active in organizing strikes and marches. After the victory of the 1979 revolution, Mo’talefeh stopped its activities as an independent political group, and at the order of Ayatollah Khomeini merged into the Islamic Republican Party of Iran (IRP). However, with the dissolution of the IRP in 1987, Mo’talefeh was reorganized as an independent association.
  • Political Party in Islamic Republic of Iran: a Review

    Political Party in Islamic Republic of Iran: a Review

    www.ccsenet.org/jpl Journal of Politics and Law Vol. 4, No. 1; March 2011 Political Party in Islamic Republic of Iran: A Review Hossein Asayesh, Adlina Ab. Halim, Jayum A. Jawan & Seyedeh Nosrat Shojaei Department of Government and Civilization Studies, Faculty of Human Ecology, Universiti Putra Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The political party is a means of connecting the political process with society and it helps to improve the political system. This paper looks at the history of political parties in Iran after the Islamic Revolution, and also considers the two main official political party groups: the Right Party and the Left Party. The article describes how each party shapes its views and develops its programs, and finally examines their similarities and differences in the field of economics, politics and culture. Keywords: Political Party, Iran, the Right Wing, the Left Wing, Islamic Republic 1. Introduction The idea of party development was born and nurtured in the early stages of political sociology. Lipset and Rokkan (1967), Lapalombara and Weiner, (1966) and Duverger (1964) were among those who pioneered sociological models of party formation, and they posited the idea that parties are formed as part of a social and political maturation process which culminated in the mature, democratic party systems we know today. A core feature of any democracy is the political party which serves as a vehicle through which citizens can assemble freely to define their political and policy aspirations, and campaign for public office (National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, 2001). And so, one can reasonably say as a political institution the political party exists in those systems committed to democratic governance.