DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrilla Verticillata Threatens South African Waters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrilla Verticillata Threatens South African Waters Hydrilla verticillata threatens South African waters J.A. Coetzee1 and P.T. Madeira2 Summary South Africa’s inland water systems are currently under threat from hydrilla, Hydrilla verticillata L. Royle (Hydrocharitaceae), the worst submerged aquatic weed in the USA. The presence of the weed was confirmed for the first time in South Africa in February 2006, on Pongolapoort Dam in KwaZulu-Natal. An aerial survey revealed that the infestation on this dam covers approximately 600 ha, which is far greater than initially thought. Despite reports that it may be present in other water bodies, surveys have shown that it is restricted to Pongolapoort Dam. We conducted a boater survey which showed that there is significant potential for this devastating weed to spread beyond Pongo- lapoort Dam, and containment of hydrilla is of utmost priority. Research into the suitability of the already established biological control agents, Hydrellia pakistanae Deonier and H. balciunasi Bock (Diptera: Ephydridae), from the USA, as potential agents in South Africa, is also being conducted. However, the South African hydrilla biotype is different from the biotypes in the USA, and this needs to be borne in mind when considering which agents to release. Keywords: potential spread, management, genetic analysis. Introduction Current distribution of The confirmation of Hydrilla verticillata L. Royle hydrilla in South Africa (Hydrocharitaceae) (hydrilla) in South Africa from and potential for spread Pongolapoort Dam, KwaZulu-Natal province (KZN), in early 2006 (L. Henderson, personal communication, Hydrilla is one of the most problematic submerged 2006) prompted immediate action to contain and con- plants worldwide, invading both tropical and temperate trol this weed, and prevent further spread to other wa- regions because of its tolerance to a wide range of envi- ter bodies around South Africa. At present, it appears ronmental conditions (Cook and Lüönd, 1982). It is not that hydrilla is restricted to Pongolapoort Dam, which clear how or when hydrilla entered South Africa, and is the centre of a multimillion rand tourist industry. It so the first step in the hydrilla biocontrol programme in is imperative that we gain an understanding of the dy- South Africa was to determine the extent of its distri- namics of the hydrilla invasion in South Africa, and po- bution. Following reports that hydrilla’s presence was tential for its control, because there is a knowledge gap suspected in a number of water bodies in KZN, both in South Africa surrounding submerged aquatic plants, aerial and boat surveys were undertaken, which con- particularly from a biological control aspect. firmed that hydrilla is currently restricted to an area of about 600 ha in Pongolapoort Dam. However, heavy rains in early January 2007 resulted in the flooding of this area, and the dam increased in capacity from 73% to 92% full in 1 week. The possibility that hydrilla 1 ARC–Plant Protection Research Institute, P/Bag X134, Queenswood has spread throughout the dam, and into the Pongola 0121, South Africa. Current address: Department of Zoology and En- tomology, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South River below should not be ruled out, and warrants fur- Africa. ther investigation. 2 USDA-ARS, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Av- While containment of hydrilla in Pongolapoort Dam enue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. is currently the main control strategy in South Africa, Corresponding author: J.A. Coetzee <[email protected], paul. [email protected]>. there is potential for this plant to spread. In the USA, © CAB International 2008 the main mode of spread of the weed is via recreational 665 XII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds boaters and fishermen (Balciunas et al., 2002) as frag- Fluridone does have non-target side effects on other ments of the plant get caught in anchors and propellers aquatic vegetation and fish, which has led to sublethal and are then transported between water bodies. It is doses being applied as this minimizes these effects, and therefore very likely that hydrilla may spread through- is more cost-effective. However, hydrilla has become out South Africa in this manner, particularly because resistant to these doses in the USA, which has compli- Pongolapoort Dam attracts thousands of tourists annu- cated control programmes (Michel et al., 2004; Dayan ally, and because it is home to the annual Tiger Fish- and Netherland, 2005). So it becomes a risk–benefit is- ing Festival, the biggest tiger fishing competition in sue in South Africa – is it worth using a lethal dose the southern hemisphere that attracts fishermen from that will remove large amounts of the plant, but that all over South Africa, and neighbouring Swaziland and will impact the fauna and flora in the dam, against the Mozambique. potential of resistance developing if sublethal doses are Fishermen are primarily responsible for hydrilla’s used, thereby ruling out the most effective control strat- spread in the USA. Therefore we conducted a survey at egy against it? the annual Tiger Fishing Festival in September 2006 to The most sustainable long-term strategy to control determine the potential for hydrilla to spread through- hydrilla should be biological control. The option of us- out South Africa by assessing boating behaviour of the ing the two species of ephydrid flies, Hydrellia paki- fishermen, and whether they were aware of the pres- stanae Deonier and H. balciunasi Bock (both Diptera: ence of hydrilla on the dam. One hundred sixty-three Ephydridae) as potential control agents against hydrilla fishermen were asked questions from a structured ques- in South Africa is being investigated, because these are tionnaire. The results showed that 51% of the fishermen the only two agents that have established in the USA interviewed only used their boats once on Pongolapoort (Center et al., 1997; Bennett and Buckingham, 2000; Dam, and that was at the September competition. The Grodowitz et al., 2000; Wheeler and Center, 2001). In results also showed that 14.1% of the fishermen used addition, the weevil, Bagous hydrillae O’Brien (Cole- their boats only on Pongolapoort Dam between Janu- optera: Curculionidae), which was tested and released ary 2005 and September 2006, and 20 respondents in the USA to control hydrilla but never established (12.2%) never used their boats anywhere except once because it requires periods of drought for pupation at the 2006 fishing competition, between January 2005 (Grodowitz et al., 2000), is being considered as a and September 2006. control agent in South Africa because drawdowns are However, analysis of the number of times fisher- implemented on Pongolapoort dam. Permits have been men used their boats in South Africa highlighted that granted to import the flies and the weevil into South dams outside of KZN were visited more frequently Africa from the USA, so that host specificity testing than those in KZN, and the majority of fishermen trav- may commence. eled between 200 and 800 km to reach their fishing Expanded surveys are also being conducted by both destinations, emphasizing the potential for hydrilla to the USDA-ARS and CSIRO to find additional control spread around South Africa. Even though a contain- agents for hydrilla in the USA (Overholt and Wheel- ment strategy is in place on Pongolapoort Dam, this er, 2006), following the discovery that infestations of survey stressed that more water bodies in South Africa hydrilla are resistant to fluridone (Michel et al., 2004; need to be assessed for the presence of hydrilla as a Puri et al., 2007). Surveys in Burundi, Uganda and result of boating activities before the fishing competi- other central and east African countries, and in Suma- tion in September. tra and China have found promising agents (Overholt and Wheeler, 2006), which could be considered as ad- Management options ditional control agents in South Africa. Mechanical and chemical control has been the most widely used control methods in the USA, although Identification and origin of the their success is varied. Typically, mechanical control introduced biotype using is time-consuming and only offers temporary control, chloroplastic markers and its use has been dissuaded in South Africa, par- ticularly because new infestations can result from plant Hydrilla is a widely distributed species whose range fragments. Until a biocontrol programme can be imple- extends from New Zealand and Australia, through mented, chemical control is currently the most favour- Southeast Asia, north through China, into Siberia, and able option for hydrilla. It should be controlled using west into Pakistan, and it also has a local and disjointed herbicides as soon as possible because it is confined to range in Africa and northern Europe (Cook and Lüönd, only one system. The most effective herbicide to date 1982). Studies have identified more than 28 different against hydrilla in the USA is fluridone, which has been hydrilla biotypes, which could have important con- widely used for large-scale control (Dayan and Nether- sequences for biological control of the plant in South land, 2005). Trials with this herbicide will commence Africa. Four major biotype clusters and one minor out- as soon as it is imported into South Africa. lier cluster have been identified (Madeira et al., 1997, 666 Hydrilla verticillata threatens South African waters 1999). The USA has two hydrilla biotypes – a dioe- Alien Species Programme of KwaZulu-Natal Depart- cious strain that clusters closely with an Indian strain, ment of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs is ac- and a monoecious strain that clusters closely with an knowledged for financial assistance. accession from Korea (Madeira et al., 1997). Several biocontrol agents have been released in the USA, but only the leaf mining fly H. pakistanae References is causing significant damage (Wheeler and Center, 2001). Regional variation in both the host plant and the Balciunas J.K., Grodowitz, M.J., Cofrancesco, A.F.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Red Names=Invasive Species Green Names=Native Species
    CURLY-LEAF PONDWEED EURASIAN WATERMIL- FANWORT CHARA (Potamogeton crispus) FOIL (Cabomba caroliniana) (Chara spp.) This undesirable exotic, also known (Myriophyllum spicatum) This submerged exotic Chara is typically found growing in species is not common as Crisp Pondweed, bears a waxy An aggressive plant, this exotic clear, hard water. Lacking true but management tools are cuticle on its upper leaves making milfoil can grow nearly 10 feet stems and leaves, Chara is actually a limited. Very similar to them stiff and somewhat brittle. in length forming dense mats form of algae. It’s stems are hollow aquarium species. Leaves The leaves have been described as at the waters surface. Grow- with leaf-like structures in a whorled are divided into fine resembling lasagna noodles, but ing in muck, sand, or rock, it pattern. It may be found growing branches in a fan-like ap- upon close inspection a row of has become a nuisance plant with tiny, orange fruiting bodies on pearance, opposite struc- “teeth” can be seen to line the mar- in many lakes and ponds by the branches called akinetes. Thick ture, spanning 2 inches. gins. Growing in dense mats near quickly outcompeting native masses of Chara can form in some Floating leaves are small, the water’s surface, it outcompetes species. Identifying features areas. Often confused with Starry diamond shape with a native plants for sun and space very include a pattern of 4 leaves stonewort, Coontail or Milfoils, it emergent white/pinkish early in spring. By midsummer, whorled around a hollow can be identified by a gritty texture flower.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrilla Vs. New York
    1 comicvine.com Hydrilla vs. New York UMISC October 16, 2018 2 Hydrilla in New York High priority species prohibited by Part 575 Now found at 32 locations throughout New York Often found near boat launches DeviantArt Waterfowl also considered a vector 3 Hydrilla in New York First discovered in 2008 2008 - Creamery Pond, Orange County 2008 – Sans Souci Lake, Lotus Lake, Suffolk County 2009 - Lake Ronkonkoma, Blydenburgh/New Mill Pond, Phillips Mill Pond, Suffolk County 2009 – Frost Mill Pond, Suffolk County 2011- Smith Pond, Great Patchoque Lake, Suffolk County; Cayuga Inlet, Tompkins County 2012 – several private ponds, Broome County 2012 – Cayuga Lake, Tompkins County; Tonawanda/Erie Canal, Niagara and Erie Counties 2013 – Croton River, Westchester County 2013 – Millers Pond, Suffolk County; Unnamed pond, Tioga County 2014 – New Croton Reservoir, Westchester County 2014 – Prospect Park, Brooklyn, Kings County 2015 – Tinker Nature Park pond, Monroe County 2016 – Aurora (Cayuga Lake), Tompkins County 2016 – Spencer Pond, Tioga County 2016 – Halsey Neck Road Pond, Suffolk County 2018 - Kuhlman Pond, Tioga County 2018 - Avon Pond, Frank Melville Pond, and East Setauket, Suffolk County 2018 – Allison Pond, Staten Island, Richmond County 4 Management Options in Place 1) No management 2) Benthic mats 3) Triploid Grass Carp 4) Herbicide 5) Combination (IPM) 5 Option: No management Suffolk County: • Lake Ronkonkoma (10 acres of 240 acres) • Sans Souci (southern 5 acres) • Lotus Lake (13 acres) • Blydenburgh/New Mill Pond (110 acres, coverage
    [Show full text]
  • 27April12acquatic Plants
    International Plant Protection Convention Protecting the world’s plant resources from pests 01 2012 ENG Aquatic plants their uses and risks Implementation Review and Support System Support and Review Implementation A review of the global status of aquatic plants Aquatic plants their uses and risks A review of the global status of aquatic plants Ryan M. Wersal, Ph.D. & John D. Madsen, Ph.D. i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of speciic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Ofice of Knowledge Exchange,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Field Host Range, Foraging Depth, and Impact Of
    FIELD HOST RANGE, FORAGING DEPTH, AND IMPACT OF CRICOTOPUS LEBETIS SUBLETTE (DIPTERA: CHIRONOMIDAE), A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT OF HYDRILLA VERTICILLATA (L.F.) ROYLE (HYDROCHARITACEAE) By EUTYCHUS MUKURE KARIUKI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Eutychus Mukure Kariuki To my loving family ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my Major Advisor, Dr. Raymond L. Hix, and my Co-Advisor, Dr. James P. Cuda, for their support and guidance during my Ph.D. program. I am also thankful to my committee members, Dr. Stephen D. Hight for his invaluable support and mentorship during the course of my research; Dr. Jennifer Gillett-Kaufman for her constant support, especially through the writing process of my dissertation; and Dr. Lyn Gettys for always being available to help with questions. I am grateful to all others who provided their assistance, including Dr. Edzard van Santen (University of Florida), Dr. Lazarus Mramba (University of Florida), Dr. Emma Weeks (University of Florida), John Mass (United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Tallahassee, Florida), Kelle Sullivan (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Dr. Lamberth Kanga (Florida A&M University), and Dr. Muhammad Haseeb (Florida A&M University). I am thankful to all my colleagues and lab mates at the University of Florida who reviewed this manuscript and offered valuable comments and suggestions. I am equally thankful to the USDA for providing funding to this study through the Hydrilla Integrated Pest Management Risk Avoidance and Mitigation Project (IPM RAMP) grant 2010-02825 and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Crop Protection and Pest Management (NIFA CPPM) grant 2014-70006-22517.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report Pdf, 2.9 MB
    VKM Report 2016:50 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) 2016:50 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety 01.11.2016 ISBN: 00000-00000 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] www.vkm.no www.english.vkm.no Suggested citation: VKM (2016). Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants. Scientific Opinion on the on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety ISBN: 978-82-8259-240-6, Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2016:50 Title: Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Authors preparing the draft opinion Hugo de Boer (chair), Maria G. Asmyhr (VKM staff), Hanne H. Grundt, Inga Kjersti Sjøtun, Hans K. Stenøien, Iris Stiers. Assessed and approved The opinion has been assessed and approved by Panel on Alien organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Members of the panel are: Vigdis Vandvik (chair), Hugo de Boer, Jan Ove Gjershaug, Kjetil Hindar, Lawrence Kirkendall, Nina Elisabeth Nagy, Anders Nielsen, Eli K.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrilla Fact Sheet
    HHEADINGEADING OFFOFF HHYDRILLAYDRILLA Another invasive species is heading towards the Great Lakes: Hydrilla verticillata onnative species are a great threat to the Great Because it is so invasive and pervasive, hydrilla Lakes region. So far, much focus has been greatly disrupts the ecological balance of all the areas Nplaced on sea lamprey, zebra mussels, alewife, where it grows. Large, dense hydrilla mats inhibit spiny water fleas, ruffe, goby, purple loosestrife and sunlight from penetrating the water and shade out native Eurasian watermilfoil. Soon, another species - Hydrilla plant species that live in the waters below them. Because verticillata – may join this list. hydrilla mats slow the movement of water, sediments Hydrilla is a robust aquatic plant that may survive build up where hydrilla thrives, decreasing the turbidity and thrive in waters of this area. As of December 2005, and creating good breeding grounds for mosquitoes. biologists have found no evidence of hydrilla in Michigan’s shallow Great Economic Impacts Lakes bays, 11,000 inland lakes or Hydrilla has serious economic thousands of miles of streams. effects resulting from the ecological However, the level of concern for impacts. As mentioned before, hydrilla ecological damage and economic harm can slow the movement of water, to Michigan’s water resources has disrupting the water supply, impeding increased due to the fact that hydrilla drainage and irrigation. This adds costs is now known to exist in two Great to the agricultural economy and also Lakes states, Pennsylvania and New negatively affects real estate values that York. are dependent upon attractive nearby waterways. Ecological Impacts Hydrilla also affects recreational Hydrilla has many adaptive qualities activities and the associated economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Hydrilla Integrated Management
    Reviewed January 2017 Publishing Information The University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution. UF/IFAS is committed to diversity of people, thought and opinion, to inclusiveness and to equal opportunity. The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication do not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. All chemicals should be used in accordance with directions on the manufacturer’s label. Use pesticides and herbicides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer’s label. For questions about using pesticides, please contact your local county Extension office. Visit http://solutionsforyourlife.ufl.edu/map to find an office near you. Copyright 2014, The University of Florida Editors Jennifer L. Gillett-Kaufman (UF/IFAS) Verena-Ulrike Lietze (UF/IFAS) Emma N.I. Weeks (UF/IFAS) Contributing Authors Julie Baniszewski (UF/IFAS) Ted D. Center (USDA/ARS, retired) Byron R. Coon (Argosy University) James P. Cuda (UF/IFAS) Amy L. Giannotti (City of Winter Park) Judy L. Gillmore (UF/IFAS) Michael J. Grodowitz (U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center) Dale H. Habeck, deceased (UF/IFAS) Nathan E. Harms (U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center) Jeffrey E. Hill (UF/IFAS) Verena-Ulrike Lietze (UF/IFAS) Jennifer Russell (UF/IFAS) Emma N.I. Weeks (UF/IFAS) Marissa L. Williams (City of Maitland) External Reviewers Nancy L. Dunn (Florida LAKEWATCH volunteer) Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry Lake – Hydrilla Management Program
    Coventry Lake – Hydrilla Management Program 2018 Final Report Draft - February 2019 Prepared For: Prepared By: SŌLitude Lake Management 590 Lake Street Shrewsbury, MA 01545 Northeast Aquatic Research George W. Knoecklein, Ph.D. 74 Higgins Highway Northeast Aquatic Research Mansfield Center, CT 06250 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2018 Management Approach .................................................................................................................. 1 Coventry Lake Aquatic Plant Survey Results ............................................................................................. 2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) in Coventry Lake was treated with the systemic herbicide Fluridone for the first time in 2018. Hydrilla, first found at the State of CT boat ramp in 2015, was treated locally with two partial lake treatments with the herbicide Aquathol-K (endothall) in 2016 and 2017. Isolated Hydrilla plants and beds smaller than 3’ in diameter were addressed with benthic barriers in 2017. Our surveys in October 2017 showed varying success from the endothall treatments but more importantly located several new areas with Hydrilla, indicating that the plant was no longer confined to the beds found in 2015 but was spreading
    [Show full text]
  • RAPID RESPONSE PLAN for HYDRILLA (Hydrilla Verticillata) in MASSACHUSETTS
    RAPID RESPONSE PLAN FOR HYDRILLA (Hydrilla verticillata) IN MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation 251 Causeway Street, Suite 700 Boston, MA 02114-2104 Prepared by ENSR 2 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 June 2005 RAPID RESPONSE PLAN FOR HYDRILLA (Hydrilla verticillata) IN MASSACHUSETTS Species Identification and Taxonomy ............................................................................................1 Species Origin and Geography .......................................................................................................2 Species Ecology................................................................................................................................3 Detection of Invasion.............................................................................................................3 Species Confirmation ............................................................................................................4 Quantifying the Extent of Invasion .......................................................................................5 Species Threat Evaluation ...............................................................................................................6 Communication and Education.............................................................................................8 Quarantine Options..............................................................................................................10 Early Eradication Options ...................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species Abundance and Their Correlationship with Microclimate and Habitat Variables at Natural Wetland Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Zoology Volume 2011, Article ID 758573, 17 pages doi:10.1155/2011/758573 Research Article Bird Species Abundance and Their Correlationship with Microclimate and Habitat Variables at Natural Wetland Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia Muhammad Nawaz Rajpar1 and Mohamed Zakaria2 1 Forest Education Division, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan 2 Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Selangor, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia Correspondence should be addressed to Mohamed Zakaria, [email protected] Received 6 May 2011; Revised 29 August 2011; Accepted 5 September 2011 Academic Editor: Iain J. McGaw Copyright © 2011 M. N. Rajpar and M. Zakaria. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Birds are the most conspicuous and significant component of freshwater wetland ecosystem. Presence or absence of birds may indicate the ecological conditions of the wetland area. The objectives of this study were to determine bird species abundance and their relationship with microclimate and habitat variables. Distance sampling point count method was applied for determining species abundance and multiple regressions was used for finding relationship between bird species abundance, microclimate and habitat variables. Bird species were monitored during November, 2007 to January, 2009. A total of 8728 individual birds comprising 89 species and 38 families were detected. Marsh Swamp was swarmed by 84 species (69.8%) followed open water body by 55 species (17.7%) and lotus swamp by 57 species (12.6%). Purple swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio (9.1% of all detections) was the most abundant bird species of marsh swamp, lesser whistling duck—Dendrocygna javanica (2.3%) was dominant species of open water body and pink-necked green pigeon—Treron vernans (1.7%) was most common species of lotus swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • RTICLE RIGINAL a New Record of the Invasive Species Hydrilla
    384 Advances in Environmental Biology, 7(2): 384-390, 2013 ISSN 1995-0756 This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLE A New Record of the Invasive Species Hydrilla verticillata (Linn.F.) Royal on the Iraqi Rivers Dr. Fathi A. Al-Mandeel Lecturer Environmental and Pollution Control Research Center University of Mosul, Iraq. Dr. Fathi A. Al-Mandeel; A New Record of the Invasive Species Hydrilla verticillata (Linn.F.) Royal on the Iraqi Rivers ABSTRACT In order to increasing the morphological and anatomical information of exotic species, specimens of Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrocharitaceae) were collected from the little Zab River within Al-Zab area about 90 km from the Kirkuk city. It is a first study that H. verticillata noted on the north Iraqi Rivers. The morphological study showed that the leaves have visible saw-tooth margins and rough teeth on the underside of the leaves.They also have spines along the lower midrib of the leaf which distinguished with reddish in color. In anatomical study, the cross sections through the internodal area of erect stems showed that the aerenchyma consists of lacunae which decreasing in their sizes toward the endodermis. The central cylinder distinguished by non-definiteness xylem tissues, and large lacuna at the center of the stem. Key words: Hydrilla verticillata , Aquatic plants, Plants taxonomy, Invasive plants, Freshwater, Ecology, Iraqi Rivers. Introduction million is spent annually to control aquatic weeds. Additional losses and damages are estimated at In the last 100 years, increasing world-wide around US$ 10 million, giving a total cost of US$ travel and trade has resulted in the introduction of 110 million per year.
    [Show full text]