Šumarski List 1-2/2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Two New Leaf-Beetles Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for the Latvian Fauna
Baltic J. Coleopterol. 9(2) 2009 ISSN 1407 - 8619 Two new leaf-beetles species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for the Latvian fauna Andris Bukejs Bukejs A. 2009. Two new leaf-beetles species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for the Latvian fauna. Baltic J. Coleopterol., 9(2): 155 – 160. The first records of the leaf-beetles, Cryptocephalus solivagus Leonardi & Sassi, 2001 and Chrysolina coerulans coerulans (Scriba, 1791) in the Latvian fauna are presented. General information on their distribution and ecology is given. The figures of the habitus and the sclerites of the endophallus of Cryptocephalus solivagus Leonardi & Sassi, 2001 are presented. Key words: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Latvia, fauna. Andris Bukejs. Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Vienîbas 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION species are reported in Eastern Europe (Bieńkowski 2004). In Latvia, 35 species are Worldwide, the leaf-beetles are one of the largest known (Bukejs et al. 2007; Bukejs 2008). groups of the order Coleoptera, represented by 30000–50000 species (Bieńkowski 2004; Brovdij The genus Chrysolina Motschulsky, 1860 1985; Jolivet 1988; Mohr 1966). This family is contains 469 species and 251 subspecies abundant and rich in species also in the fauna of (Bieńkowski 2007). Most species are distributed Latvia and the Baltic States. The history of in Europe, Asia and Africa. A small number of investigation of leaf-beetles in Latvia is more than species inhabits North America (including 220 years old (Bukejs 2008). introduced European ones). Some species were introduced into Australia (Bieńkowski 2001). In the present paper faunistic data on two leaf- There are 49 species known from Eastern Europe beetles species, Cryptocephalus solivagus (Bieńkowski 2004). -
Brouci Z Čeledi Mandelinkovitých (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Lokality Hůrka V Hluboké Nad Vltavou
STŘEDOŠKOLSKÁ ODBORNÁ ČINNOST Brouci z čeledi mandelinkovitých (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) lokality Hůrka v Hluboké nad Vltavou Albert Damaška Praha 2012 STŘEDOŠKOLSKÁ ODBORNÁ ČINNOST OBOR SOČ: 08 – Ochrana a tvorba životního prostředí Brouci z čeledi mandelinkovitých (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) lokality Hůrka v Hluboké nad Vltavou Leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) of the locality „Hůrka“ in Hluboká nad Vltavou Autor: Albert Damaška Škola: Gymnázium Jana Nerudy, Hellichova 3, Praha 1 Konzultant: Michael Mikát Praha 2012 1 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem svou práci vypracoval samostatně pod vedením Michaela Mikáta, použil jsem pouze podklady (literaturu, SW atd.) uvedené v přiloženém seznamu a postup při zpracování a dalším nakládání s prací je v souladu se zákonem č. 121/2000 Sb., o právu autorském, o právech souvisejících s právem autorským a o změně některých zákonů (autorský zákon) v platném znění. V ………… dne ………………… podpis: …………………………… 2 Poděkování Rád bych na tomto místě poděkoval především svému konzultantovi Michaelu Mikátovi za pomoc při psaní textu práce, tvorbě grafů a výpočtech. Dále patří dík Mgr. Pavlu Špryňarovi a RNDr. Jaromíru Strejčkovi za determinaci některých jedinců a za cenné rady a zkušenosti k práci v terénu, které jsem mimo jiné užil i při sběru dat pro tuto práci. Děkuji i Mgr. Lýdii Černé za korekturu anglického jazyka v anotaci. V neposlední řadě patří dík i mým rodičům za obětavou pomoc v mnoha situacích a za pomoc při dopravě na lokalitu. 3 Anotace Mandelinkovití brouci (Chrysomelidae) jsou velmi vhodnými bioindikátory vzhledem k jejich vazbě na rostliny. Cílem práce bylo provedení faunistického průzkumu brouků čeledi mandelinkovitých na lokalitě Hůrka v Hluboké nad Vltavou na Českobudějovicku a zjištěné výsledky aplikovat v ochraně lokality. -
Bladkevers Van Hellinggraslanden En Het Natuurbeleid
NATUUIÏHISTORISCH MAANDBLAD OKTOBER 2002 lAARGANG 227 BLADKEVERS VAN HELLINGGRASLANDEN EN HET NATUURBELEID Ron Beenen, Martinus Nijhoffhove 51, 3437 ZP Nieuwegein Dit artikel behandelt bladkeversoorten {Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) die voor• komen in typisch Zuid-Limburgse natuurtypen, de hellinggraslanden. De effec• ten van het voorgenomen beleid van het Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur• beheer en Visserij met betrekking tot dit natuurtype wordt op voorhand geëvalueerd voor bladkevers. Er wordt ingegaan op de relatie van deze kever• soorten met doelsoorten uit de groep van hogere planten. Tevens wordt bezien in hoeverre doelsoorten uit groepen van ongewervelde dieren representatief zijn voor de bladkevers van hellinggraslanden. INLEIDING is gezocht, circa 42.000 soorten waargeno• FIGUUR I Wormkruidkever (Galeruca men (VAN NIEUKERKEN & VAN LOON, 1995). tanaceti) mei eipokket Het Nederlandse natuurbeleid heeft een gro• De selectie van "slechts" 1042 doelsoorten (tekening: R. Beenen). te sprong voorwaarts gemaakt toen er natuur• (2,5 %) lijkt daarom in tegenspraak met de re• doelen geformuleerd werden. In het Hand• cente rijksnota "Natuur voor mensen, men• boek Natuurdoeltypen in Nederland (BAL et sen voor natuur" (MINISTERIE VAN LAND• al., 2001) worden 92 natuurdoeltypen be• BOUW, NATUURBEHEER EN VISSERIJ, 2000). voedselplanten van karakteristieke bladke• schreven en worden per doeltype doelsoor• Hierin staat immers als één van de taakstellin• versoorten van hellinggraslanden. Bladke• ten benoemd. Door het nauwkeurigomschrij- gen geformuleerd: "In 2020 zijn voor alle in vers zijn veelal zeer specifiek in hun voedsel• ven van Natuurdoeltypen is het mogelijk om 1982 in Nederland van nature voorkomende planten indien de voedselplant als natuurdoel de kwaliteit van natuurterreinen te toetsen. soorten en populaties de condities voor in• geformuleerd is, dan is de kans groot dat aan Uitgangspunt van het nationale natuurbeleid is standhouding duurzaam aanwezig". -
Beetles from Sălaj County, Romania (Coleoptera, Excluding Carabidae)
Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii Vol. 26 supplement 1, 2016, pp.5- 58 © 2016 Vasile Goldis University Press (www.studiauniversitatis.ro) BEETLES FROM SĂLAJ COUNTY, ROMANIA (COLEOPTERA, EXCLUDING CARABIDAE) Ottó Merkl, Tamás Németh, Attila Podlussány Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum ABSTRACT: During a faunistical exploration of Sǎlaj county carried out in 2014 and 2015, 840 beetle species were recorded, including two species of Community interest (Natura 2000 species): Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) and Lucanus cervus Linnaeus, 1758. Notes on the distribution of Augyles marmota (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (Heteroceridae), Trichodes punctatus Fischer von Waldheim, 1829 (Cleridae), Laena reitteri Weise, 1877 (Tenebrionidae), Brachysomus ornatus Stierlin, 1892, Lixus cylindrus (Fabricius, 1781) (Curculionidae), Mylacomorphus globus (Seidlitz, 1868) (Curculionidae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, beetles, Sǎlaj, Romania, Transsylvania, faunistics INTRODUCTION: László Dányi, LF = László Forró, LR = László The beetle fauna of Sǎlaj county is relatively little Ronkay, MT = Mária Tóth, OM = Ottó Merkl, PS = known compared to that of Romania, and even to other Péter Sulyán, VS = Viktória Szőke, ZB = Zsolt Bálint, parts of Transsylvania. Zilahi Kiss (1905) listed ZE = Zoltán Erőss, ZS = Zoltán Soltész, ZV = Zoltán altogether 2,214 data of 1,373 species of 537 genera Vas). The serial numbers in parentheses refer to the list from Sǎlaj county mainly based on his own collections of collecting sites published in this volume by A. and partially on those of Kuthy (1897). Some of his Gubányi. collection sites (e.g. Tasnád or Hadad) no longer The collected specimens were identified by belong to Sǎlaj county. numerous coleopterists. Their names are given under Vasile Goldiş Western University (Arad) and the the names of beetle families. -
Some Results of Breeding a Predatory Stink Bug of Perillus Bioculatus F. (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) in the Republic of Moldova
BIO Web of Conferences 21, 00024 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202100024 XI International Scientific and Practical Conference “Biological Plant Protection is the Basis of Agroecosystems Stabilization” Some results of breeding a predatory stink bug of Perillus bioculatus F. (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) in the Republic of Moldova Dina Elisovetcaia1*, Valeriu Derjanschi1, Irina Agas'eva 2, and Mariya Nefedova2 1Institute of Zoology, Republic of Moldova, Chisinau 2All-Russian Research Institute of Biological Plant Protection, Russia, Krasnodar-39, 350039 Abstract. The impact of insect artificial diet on the egg production of females was examined for L29 consequently generations of laboratory populations Perillus bioculatus (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Asopinae). Particular attention is paid to the overwintered generation, which plays a key role in the rehabilitation of the predator populations after hibernation. It was shown that with an increase in the number of laboratory generations of a predator (from L13 to L29), egg production of P. bioculatus females significantly decreases – from 16.4-35.7 to 15.0-27.5 eggs / female in terms of the total number of females in the laboratory populations. The proportion of eggs laid by females of winter generation was the lowest when feeding on Galleria mellonella larvae. Was established food preferences among the assortment of native for Republic of Moldova leaf beetles: Entomoscelis adonidis Pallas 1771, Chrysolina herbacea (Duftschmid, 1825) and C. coerulans (Scriba, 1791). P. bioculatus imago overwintered generation refused to feed on E. suturalis larvae and imago, probably because of the isoquinoline alkalods contained in the hemolymph of the leaf beetle. Studies have shown that supplementary feeding with imago of E. -
RHS Gardening in a Changing Climate Report
Gardening in a Changing Climate Acknowledgements The RHS and University of Reading would like to acknowledge the support provided by Innovate UK through the short Knowledge Transfer Partnership KTP 1000769 from November 2012 to September 2013. The RHS is grateful to the Trustees of Spencer Horticultural Trust, who supported the project to revise the Gardening in the Global Greenhouse report. The RHS would also like to thank: The authors of the 2002 report, Richard Bisgrove and Professor Paul Hadley, for building the foundations for this updated report. The contributors of this report: Dr John David (RHS), Dr Ross Cameron (University of Sheffield), Dr Alastair Culham (University of Reading), Kathy Maskell (Walker Institute, University of Reading) and Dr Claudia Bernardini (KTP Research Associate). Dr Mark McCarthy (Met Office) and Professor Tim Sparks (Coventry University) for their expert consultation on the climate projections and phenology chapters, respectively. This document is available to download as a free PDF at: Gardening in a www.rhs.org.uk/climate-change Citation Changing Climate Webster E, Cameron RWF and Culham A (2017) Gardening in a Changing Climate, Royal Horticultural Society, UK. Eleanor Webster, About the authors Ross Cameron and Dr Eleanor Webster is a Climate Scientist at the Royal Horticultural Alastair Culham Society Dr Ross Cameron is a Senior Lecturer in Landscape Management, Ecology & Design at the University of Sheffield Dr Alastair Culham is an Associate Professor of Botany at the University of Reading Gardening in a Changing Climate RHS 2 3 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 3.4 The UK’s variable weather and its implications for projections of future climate ....................................................... -
New RHS Climate Change Survey
RHSScience IssUE 16 — aPRIL 2013. PHOTOS . New RHS climate MIKE SLEIGH ( change survey DROUGHT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE UNIVERSITY of Reading, the ); RHS has launched a survey to better understand CAROL how gardeners are reacting to changes in the UK SHEPPARD climate and to discover whether they have been ( provided with the knowledge they need to plan FLOOD their gardening in the future. ) This survey is intended to provide the material for the follow-up to the RHS’s 2002 report ‘Gardening in the Global Greenhouse’, which discussed potential challenges that gardens and gardeners in the UK were likely to face, based on climate change projections. survey will help us understand the perceived effects The 2002 ‘Gardening According to more recent climate models, the of climate change and the individual’s response to in the Global projections have changed. Thus UK gardeners may well those changes, a vital part of the new report and Greenhouse’ have to prepare for a different set of climatic conditions. for new adaptation strategies in UK gardening report predicted practices.” n extremes of Says Claudia Bernardini, who is leading the project weather and for the RHS, “We need to plan and prepare for what ► To take part in the survey, go to http://blogs. more exotic plantings. future changes might bring. The findings from this reading.ac.uk/crg/climate-change-and-gardening Andrew Halstead garden fauna. Following a fewer than 13 talks on subjects has left the building recent promotion, as Principal ranging from “bugs that bite After 41 years at Wisley, Andrew Scientist Plant Health, he also back” to honeybee anatomy. -
Niedervieland/Ochtumniederung (Coleóptera, Chrysomelidae) 145-153 DROSERA ’95(2): 145-153 Oldenburg 1995-XII
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Drosera Jahr/Year: 1995 Band/Volume: 1995 Autor(en)/Author(s): Handke Klaus Artikel/Article: Zur Blattkäferfauna eines Nordwestdeutschen Flußmarschengebietes - Niedervieland/Ochtumniederung (Coleóptera, Chrysomelidae) 145-153 DROSERA ’95(2): 145-153 Oldenburg 1995-XII Zur Blattkäferfauna eines Nordwestdeutschen Fluß marschengebietes - Niedervieland/Ochtumniederung (Coleóptera, Chrysomelidae) Klaus Handke Abstract: Within time period between 1985 and 1994, 97 species of Chrysomelidae were proved by captures of pitfall traps, net, box and hand on more than 300 sites in the investi gation area of 35 km2. Reeds and borders of ditches are the most species-rich and the most important habitats for Chrysomelidae also regarding quantities. Only here could 56 species be proved, 11 species living in reeds among them. The fauna of Chrysomelidae in the several habitats is discussed. The few and mostly isolated woods are very poor in spe cies. Unemployed structures as, for example, fallow land, borders and reeds are important habitats for the Chrysomelidae. Only a few species can be found in the conventionally used mesophilous grassland. Especially the borders of ditches with specialized hygrophilous species after all those among the species living in reeds are important for nature con servation. 1. Einführung Obwohl Blattkäfer fast alle mitteleuropäischen Lebensräume in teilweise hohen Arten- und Individuenzahlen besiedeln, existieren über diese Käfergruppe nur relativ wenige faunistische Untersuchungen. So finden sich aus dem nordwestdeutschen Raum fast keine Informationen über die Blattkäferfauna von Grünland(Hildebrandt in Vorher.). Eine aktuelle systematische Artenliste über Schleswig-Holstein und das nördliche Nie dersachsen (Niederelbegebiet) liegt aber inzwischen vor (Gürlich 1992). -
Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
682 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2016__________ A COMPARATIVE LIST OF THE LEAF BEETLES OF THE PROVINCES IN MARMARA REGION OF TURKEY, EXCLUDING BRUCHINAE (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) Hüseyin Özdikmen* * Gazi University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mails: [email protected] [Özdikmen, H. 2016. A comparative list of the leaf beetles of the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey, excluding Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 11 (2): 682-690] ABSTRACT: This work is presented a comparative list of the leaf beetles of the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey, excluding Bruchinae. All known taxa from the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey and thereby European Turkey are given in the present text. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, European Turkey, Marmara Region, Turkey Any direct research on leaf beetles in Marmara Region of Turkey is not present. Therefore fauna of leaf beetles in Marmara Region of Turkey is not sufficiently known. Chiefly, a complete faunistic information about all the leaf beetle taxa established in European Turkey in Marmara Region of Turkey was firstly published by Löbl & Smetana (2010) in their Palaearctic catalogue of Chrysomeloidea. Then, an important study titled “Checklist of leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Turkey, excluding Bruchinae” was published by Ekiz et al. (2013). Later works were published by Özdikmen (2014a,b,c), Özdikmen & Kaya (2014), Özdikmen & Mercan (2014), Özdikmen & Cihan (2014), Özdikmen & Özbek (2014), Özdikmen & Kavak (2014) and Özdikmen & Topcu (2014). Although the mentioned studies helped to determine the list of leaf beetles from the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey, the list needs further corrections to be fully and correctly realized. -
Rosemary Beetle Chrysolina Americana in Israel
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 46, pp. 87–91 (29 July 2016) SHORT COMMUNICATION Rosemary beetle Chrysolina americana: A new invasive leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) in Israel ARIEL -LEIB -LEONID FRIEDM A N The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Israel National Center for Biodiversity Studies and Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978 Israel. E-mail: [email protected] The Rosemary Leaf Beetle (Chrysolina (Taeniochrysea) americana (Linnaeus, 1758)) does not occur in Americas, it was given this name erroneously. It is dis tributed around the Mediterranean Sea in southern Europe, North Africa, the Near East and the Middle East (Balachowsky 1963), although the only avail able records from the Near East are from Turkey (western and southwestern pro vinces) (Gül Zümreoğlu 1972; Tuatay et al. 1972; Kısmalı 1973; Aslan et al. 2003). I failed to find any additional record of C. americana from the Near East. C. americana is actively expanding its distribution to the north; it appeared in the UK in 1963, and is now considered to be established there (Johnson 1963; Halstead 1996; Barclay & Mann 2002; MacLeod 2002). In recent decades it has been recorded from Belgium, Germany, Switzerland (Kippenberg 2015), The Netherlands (Beenen & Winkelman 2001) and Latvia (Telnov et al. 1997; Bukejs & Telnov 2010). C. americana feeds and breeds mainly on the leaves of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) and la ven der (Lavandula species), but also on thyme (Thymus spp.), sage (Salvia spp.), Russian Sage (Perovskia atriplicifolia Benth.), and possibly other plants in the Lamiaceae family (Balachowsky 1963; Bibolini 1964; Halstead 1996; Barclay & Mann 2002; MacLeod 2002; CABI 2016). -
Effectiveness of Maize As an Intercrop in the Management of Insect Pests of Okra: Is There a Better Intercrop Pattern Than Random Intercrop Practiced by Farmers?
J. Crop Prot. 2018, 7 (1): 65-72________________________________________________________ Research Article Effectiveness of maize as an intercrop in the management of insect pests of okra: Is there a better intercrop pattern than random intercrop practiced by farmers? Usman Zakka, Luke Chinaru Nwosu* and Lemea Peace Nkue Department of Crop and Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, P. M. B. 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Abstract: A field trial was carried out during the rainy season of 2015 at the Teaching and Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria to determine the effectiveness of maize Zea mays L. as an intercrop in managing the pests of okra Abelmoschus esculentum L. There were five treatments namely 1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1 (okra to maize intercrop ratios), farmers’ practice (random intercrop) and control plot (sole okra). The treatments were assigned one to a plot and arranged in randomized complete block design with four replications. Data were taken on number of days to 50% seedling emergence, 50% flowering and 50% fruiting, number of holes in the leaf damage, number of fruits, weight of undamaged fruits, weight of damaged fruit and population density of insect pests. The sole okra had the highest leaf damage and number of insect pests. Podagrica uniforma Jacoby (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was the most important insect pest of okra in terms of population density. Okra intercropped with maize in the ratio of 1:1 was the most effective intercrop system in insect pest management. The intercrop pattern should be promoted while random intercrop pattern practiced by farmers should be discouraged. -
CHRYSOMELA Linnaeus, 1758 GONIOCTENA Dejean, 1836 PHRATORA Dejean, 1836
Subfamily Chrysomelinae Very convex hairless beetles; antennae generally somewhat thickened towards apex. They are usually collected by sweeping in summer, but some may be found in winter in moss, leaf litter etc. Source material Joy (1932) A Practical Handbook of British Beetles. Lompe A. (2013) Käfer Europas: Chrysomelinae published online on pages linked from http://www.coleo-net.de/coleo/texte/chrysomelinae.htm. Translated and published here with permission. Image credits Unless otherwise indicated, all images are reproduced from the Iconographia Coleopterorum Poloniae, with permission kindly granted by Lech Borowiec. Checklist from the Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 2012 edition, edited by A. G. Duff, (available to download from www.coleopterist.org.uk/checklist.htm). Subfamily Chrysomelinae TIMARCHA Samouelle, 1819 CHRYSOLINA Motschulsky, 1860 GASTROPHYSA Dejean, 1836 PHAEDON Latreille, 1829 HYDROTHASSA Thomson, C.G., 1859 PRASOCURIS Latreille, 1802 PLAGIODERA Dejean, 1836 CHRYSOMELA Linnaeus, 1758 GONIOCTENA Dejean, 1836 PHRATORA Dejean, 1836 Creative Commons. © Mike Hackston (2015). Adapted and updated from Joy (1932). Some species keys translated from the German, original from Dr Arved Lompe (published here with permission). CHRYSOLINA Motschulsky, 1860 GONIOCTENA Dejean, 1836 americana (Linnaeus, 1758) decemnotata (Marsham, 1802) banksii (Fabricius, 1775) olivacea (Forster, 1771) brunsvicensis (Gravenhorst, 1807) pallida (Linnaeus, 1758) cerealis (Linnaeus, 1767) viminalis (Linnaeus, 1758) coerulans (Scriba, 1791)