DOCSLIB.ORG

London's Deepest Tunnel and Shafts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London's Deepest Tunnel and Shafts LONDON’S DEEPEST TUNNEL AND SHAFTS WEALTH CREATION LONDON’S DEEPEST The Lee Tunnel – the UK water industry’s largest project since its privatisation in 1989 – is the deepest tunnel ever built in London. Richard Sutherden, design manager for the project management team on this Thames Water project, describes the challenges and solutions TUNNEL AND SHAFTS for the venture that will become operational at the end of the year. London’s deepest tunnel is now nearing of 1858, the ‘Great Stink’ in the river was so water to discharge into the Thames completion in east London. When it is overwhelming that it affected the work of downstream of the capital, and later, into finished, the Lee Tunnel, with a total cost of the House of Commons. That same year, sewage works. The interceptor sewers north £635 million, will stop the pollution of the Parliament passed an enabling Act for the of the Thames converge on the Victorian nearby River Lee, which currently has to Metropolitan Water Board’s main drainage Gothic Abbey Mills pumping station, where accept sewage and storm water beyond the scheme, devised by Joseph Bazalgette, the the sewage is lifted to flow in huge brick capacity of the capital’s 19th century Board’s engineer. Bazalgette’s system pipes above ground along the Northern sewage system. The Lee Tunnel is the first of comprised 2,100km of sewers feeding into Outfall Sewer to Beckton, beside the two tunnels in Thames Water’s London 131km of large interceptor sewers running Thames. By Bazalgette’s own estimate, the Tideway Improvement Programme. The 6.9 west to east, parallel to the river. The system scheme saved around 12,000 deaths a year kilometre-long tunnel forms the eastern, carried a mixture of sewage and storm from cholera and other waterborne diseases. downstream end of the system. The Lee Tunnel will store and carry sewage and storm water from Abbey Mills pumping station in East London to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works. Constructing the tunnel posed unprecedented challenges in dealing with high groundwater pressures. Its deepest sections run over 75m below ground level, where the groundwater pressure is up to 8 bar. But the greatest innovations came in construction of the five shafts, the largest ever sunk in the capital. They involved the UK’s deepest diaphragm walls, and a world first in building the inner linings as huge stand-alone, concrete chimneys. LONDON’S SEWAGE SYSTEM In the 1850s, some 400,000 tonnes of The Lee Tunnel overflow shaft shortly after construction of the shaft secondary lining and before the launch of the TBM. The 9.9km-long Lee Tunnel runs from Joseph Bazalgette’s Abbey Mills pumping station in East London The excavation of this shaft was 79m deep and the diaphragm walls supporting this 20m internal diameter shaft (the sewage were flushed into the River Thames to Europe’s largest sewage works at Beckton, beside the River Thames. Later, it will connect to the larger Thames tunnel from West London © NCE smallest on the project) are 90m in depth. © Thames Water each day. During the unusually hot summer 32 INGENIA INGENIA ISSUE 63 JUNE 2015 33 LONDON’S DEEPEST TUNNEL AND SHAFTS WEALTH CREATION presented both a challenge and an process exploits the extraordinary thixotropic a ‘blow-out’ of groundwater before the base Bazalgette anticipated the growth of the first stage will upgrade all sewage treatment opportunity. The project was challenging properties of bentonite slurry: the slurry is was capped. The massive, heavily reinforced metropolis and designed his system to last, works, the second is the construction of the because of the depth, the groundwater semi-solid when static and can therefore base slabs, inverted domes, transferred the with the highest quality of construction and Lee tunnel and the third will be the Thames pressures, and the tight tolerances on support the sides of a trench, but returns to forces from the upward water pressure into considerable spare capacity. To cope with Tideway Tunnel. The Thames Tideway Tunnel verticality. These ruled out conventional its liquid state when agitated. Trenches are the walls. The largest of these was 4m thick, occasional extreme events, such as major will run 25 kilometres from Acton in West shaft construction techniques such as excavated under the slurry, with cages of with 4,000m³ of heavily reinforced concrete: storm surges, he included 57 combined London, directly below the Thames before caisson sinking, or piling and underpinning reinforcing steel lowered in, and then it is the largest shaft base ever in the UK, yet sewer overflows (CSOs), allowing the excess veering northeast to Abbey Mills. From with shotcrete (sprayed wet-mix concrete). It tremied (underwater) concrete is pumped to another record for the Lee Tunnel. to overspill back into the Thames to avoid Abbey Mills it will connect into the Lee was also an opportunity, because more the bottom, displacing the bentonite as it Construction took 48 hours, pouring up to flooding. Tunnel to take the sewage to Beckton shafts will be needed further upstream, most rose. The technology, borrowed from the 150m³ of concrete per hour. The system has coped remarkably well for Sewage Treatment Works. The tunnel is of them much closer to existing buildings: mining industry, was first introduced into a century and a half, but Bazalgette’s ‘extreme deep throughout, to avoid the myriad the Lee Tunnel shafts could be a test-bed for construction in the 1950s – see Deepest-ever events’ now happen about once a week. existing services under London, particularly developing safe and economical solutions. diaphragm walls. CREATING THE SHAFT’S Every year, some 39 million tonnes of sewage the cable tunnels under the Olympic Park. The first decision was to use traditional With the wall complete, the soil inside INNER LINING mixed with rainwater flow through the CSOs The sewage flows by gravity, so it is deepest diaphragm walling techniques to create the could be excavated, with internal relief wells The smooth-faced inner lining, with its many into the Thames. About 40% of this discharge at the eastern end, which is the Lee Tunnel. outer linings of the shafts. The construction to relieve the hydrostatic pressure and avoid cut-outs and details, still had to be added is from Abbey Mills CSO, from where it flows into the Thames via the River Lee. Thames Water’s proposed Thames BUILDING THE SHAFTS One of more than 50 combined sewer overflows DEEPEST-EVER DIAPHRAGM WALLS Tideway Improvement programme is Sinking the shafts – two at Abbey Mills and which, on an average of once a week, discharge untreated sewage and storm water into the River designed to minimise these overflows, as three at Beckton, with the largest at 38m Thames in London, a total of 40 million tonnes a well as improving the sewage works. The internal diameter with walls 98m deep – year © Thames Water The primary lining for the cylindrical shafts was formed as a series of vertical primary panels, linked together by secondary infill panels. The trenches for the operator of the plan position, inclination and twist of the cutter body. panels were excavated under a bentonite slurry using a hydrofraise (pictured right), a crane-mounted drilling machine with counter-rotating cutters within a Hydraulic rams and pressure plates on the cutter body can be jacked steel frame, and then filled with concrete. © Thames Water against the side of the panels to change the inclination of the cutter Made ground/alluvium heads and correct any errors in verticality. As an innovation on the 25m 25m River terrace deposits 25m 38m Diameter Diameter Diameter Diameter London clay deposits The Lee Tunnel shaft was to be the deepest ever sunk in the UK and Lee shafts, this was supplemented by lowering an ultrasonic echo 68m 68m Harwich formation 78.5m 86.5m presented several challenges. In particular, how could verticality be sensor into the trench, and configuring the output to give three- Depth Depth Depth Depth 1.5m 1.2m Lambeth group 1.5m 1.8m 20m maintained within 1:300 tolerance over the full depth of nearly dimensional imaging of the excavation. The data confirmed that the Diaphragm Diaphragm Diaphragm Diaphragm Diameter 100m, and how could the resulting structure be as near as possible maximum out-of-plumb at the bottom of the five shafts was just wall wall wall wall thickness thickness Thanet sand formation thickness thickness 74.5m 15 cm – well within the required tolerance for these 38-metre- Depth to a regular cylindrical shell? With the shafts working in compression 86m 83m 92m 98m to support the ground, verticality was essential to ensure sufficient diameter shafts. Diaphragm Diaphragm Chalk group Diaphragm Diaphragm 1.5m wall depth wall depth wall depth wall depth Diaphragm wall thickness overlap between panels to bring down the compressive stress in the The shaft walls were sunk as a series of panels, 7.2 m long and up 90m concrete to within design limits. to 1.8 m thick, with gaps between panels. Each panel took a week to Diaphragm wall depth The key to controlling these variables was in carefully monitoring build, with concrete poured continuously to avoid the formation of what was going on. A conventional crane-mounted grab dug the ‘cold joints’, where there could be cracking and water penetration. trench in the upper levels. At the lower levels, a special ‘hydrofraise’ The concrete mix was designed so that it did not reach its minimum took over: a crane-mounted drilling machine fitted with two cutter compressive strength until 56 days after pouring. This gave the team drums rotating in opposite directions to break up the soil within the enough time to construct the secondary panels through the primary bentonite.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ
    This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system.
    [Show full text]
  • EC1 Local History Trail EC1 Local Library & Cultural Services 15786 Cover/Pages 1-4 12/8/03 12:18 Pm Page 2
    15786 cover/pages 1-4 12/8/03 12:18 pm Page 1 Local History Centre Finsbury Library 245 St. John Street London EC1V 4NB Appointments & enquiries (020) 7527 7988 [email protected] www.islington.gov.uk Closest Tube: Angel EC1 Local History Trail Library & Cultural Services 15786 cover/pages 1-4 12/8/03 12:18 pm Page 2 On leaving Finsbury Library, turn right down St. John Street. This is an ancient highway, originally Walk up Turnmill Street, noting the open railway line on the left: imagine what an enormous leading from Smithfield to Barnet and the North. It was used by drovers to send their animals to the excavation this must have been! (Our print will give you some idea) Cross over Clerkenwell Rd into market. Cross Skinner Street. (William Godwin, the early 18th century radical philosopher and partner Farringdon Lane. Ahead, you’ll see ‘Well Court’. Look through the windows and there is the Clerk’s of Mary Wollestonecraft, lived in the street) Well and some information boards. Double back and turn into Clerkenwell Green. On your r. is the Sessions House (1779). The front is decorated with friezes by Nollekens, showing Justice & Mercy. Bear right off St John Street into Sekforde Street. Suddenly you enter a quieter atmosphere...On the It’s now a Masonic Hall. In the 17th century, the Green was affluent, but by the 19th, as Clerkenwell was right hand side (rhs) is the Finsbury Savings Bank, established at another site in 1816. Walk on past heavily industrialised and very densely populated with poor workers, it became a centre of social & the Sekforde Arms (or go in if you fancy!) and turn left into Woodbridge Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Conservancy Act, 1950
    Thames Conservancy Act, 1950 14 GEO. 6 Cli. 1 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short and collective titles. 2. Division of Act into Parts. 3. Amending definition of Thames in Act of 1932. 4. Interpretation. 5. Repeal of enactments. PART II CONSTITUTION AND PROCEEDINGS OF CONSERVATORS 6. Constitution of Conservators. 7. Increase in number of Conservators. 8. Term of office of Conservators. 9. Conservator interested in a contract. 10. As to contracts. PART III FURTHER POWERS IN RELATION TO CONSERVANCY NAVIGATION ETC. 11. Amendment of sections 69 70 and 71 of Act of 1932. 12. Power to enter and inspect vessels. 13. Name of launch to be conspicuously displayed. 14. Amendment of section 92 of Act of 1932. 15. Owner of pleasure boat to afford information as to person in charge. 16. Removal of sunk stranded or abandoned vessels. PART IV LANDS 17. Purchase of lands. PART V PREVENTION OF POLLUTION 18. Special interpretation relating to pollution. 19. Map of Thames catchment area. A Ch. I Thames Conservancy 14 GEO. 6 Act, 1950 Section 20. Amendment of section 124 of Act of 21. Sanitary authorities owners and occupiers to afford information. 22. Provision in case of neglect of sanitary authority to perform certain duties. 23. Inspection of sanitary arrangements of vessels. 24. Removal of dead animals. PART VI CHARGES ON VESSELS MERCHANDISE ETC. (a) Tolls on merchandise traffic 25. Tolls on merchandise traffic. (b) Tolls for piers 26. Tolls leviable at piers and landing places. (c) Lock tolls and charges on pleasure boats 27. Lock tolls on pleasure boats.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability
    In this section of the report, we highlight how customer engagement underpins everything we do. We’ve engaged with nearly a million customers to understand what their needs are and what they want from us as we look to develop our strategy and long-term plans. We submitted our draft business plan to our regulator Ofwat on 3 September 2018 and published it on our website here. We also highlight how working in partnership with our stakeholders and regulators is fundamental to the way we do business. We know that the decisions we make today affect our ability to deliver our services sustainably in the future. That’s why we’re committed to working collaboratively with partners who can align to our vision and values to deliver excellently on our customer and stakeholder promises. We describe our corporate responsibility programme which focusses on education, engagement and enhancement - designed to engage our people, customers and stakeholders on key business and environmental issues. We also show how we offer support to charitable groups within the communities we serve, through projects linked to our core business of providing essential water and wastewater services. Sustainable and resilient financing is crucial to our long-term provision of essential services to customers. We outline how we’re simplifying our structure and closing our Cayman Islands subsidiaries, and how we’re increasing resilience and diversity in our funding portfolio by raising our first Green Bond. We’ve also brought together three years’ worth of key financial data, data sources, policy references and performance data in one place for all stakeholders by producing an environmental, social and governance (ESG) statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study – April 2018
    Collaborative working to reduce disruption. Case study – April 2018. Collaborative working to reduce disruption. We’re passionate about reducing the impact our work can have on customers across our region. So we’re working with gas, power and telecommunications providers, as well as Transport for London, the London Borough of Croydon and the Greater London Authority, to see how collaborating on planned streetworks can reduce the impact on the lives of all our customers, local communities and the environment, while still improving our services. Background. Over the past year we’ve been working with Atkins and their digital partner Fluxx, challenging ourselves to make improvements in the way we deliver streetworks to reduce their impact on our customers, and become more efficient by collaborating better. We know that our essential streetworks can often Visualising complex data. disrupt our customers’ daily lives, especially when a During our workshops with teams across Thames road reopens only to quickly close again for a different Water, we identified numerous benefits of sharing project, or for another company to start work. project information at the planning stage - including less frequent streetwork disruptions, less From talking to our customers, we know that they environmental impact, saving money, and better want us to minimise the inconvenience of roadworks. relations with our partners and customers. Our customers see the need for roadworks to maintain and upgrade infrastructure, but they want However, sharing complicated early stage pre- planning, advance warning, co-ordination with other planning information can be very difficult. This is utilities and highway authorities, and clear information because the information often isn’t finalised yet, it’s about the roadworks and how long they’ll last.
    [Show full text]
  • London Tideway Tunnels Modernising London's Sewerage System
    London Tideway Tunnels Modernising London’s Sewerage System Rob Furniss AECOM Water Global Director of Community Infrastructure The Background to London’s Sewers 1848 – Cholera deaths peak In London 1858 - The Great Stink – Parliament suspended London Cholera Deaths 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1831 1833 1848 3 “Lost” rivers of London Stoke River Roding Hampstead Newington Islington Bow Barking Creek Black Notting Hill Ditch Erith Waterloo Chelsea Woolwich Battersea Eltham Roehampton Forest Hill Streatham BevBev erley erley Brook Brook 8383 4 London’s Sewers - Evolution and Complexity Original sewers and local collectors River Wall Plan River Thames Bazalgette’s Storm relief Interceptor sewers and Sewers pumping station Ground level High Tide Low Tide Section 5 Intercepting sewers H rn i the g Nor h L Hampstead e Central London Stoke ve Newington l Middle Level No. 2 Intercepting Sewers W i ck L at the present day Islington a n Abbey Mills e B Pumping o. 1 r vel N a Station Middle Le n Bow c Notting Hill h L c D n h I o ra s W llyB o N i L w o 2 l o d w . g ca Level o e rth e c N i s L s P No er Crossness e o rth n e te rn B O f Pumping Station v u r mping r Se t u e f n Western P Lo lNo. 1 a w al e l wL ev n er l Station c Waterloo h am N Be m lh r o u h l o n F nc ve .
    [Show full text]
  • The Lee Tunnel - Tideway Pumping Station an 87M Deep/38M Diameter Pumping Shaft to Transfer the Volume of the Lee Tunnel to Becktonstw by Phil Muir Ceng Mimeche
    www.WaterProjectsOnline.com Wastewater Treatment & Sewerage The Lee Tunnel - Tideway Pumping Station an 87m deep/38m diameter pumping shaft to transfer the volume of the Lee Tunnel to BecktonSTW by Phil Muir CEng MIMechE he Lee Tunnel is part of Thames Water’s London Tideway Improvements Scheme, which will return the River Thames to an acceptable state of cleanliness by 2023. The improvements scheme comprises three projects, the Tupgrade of five major sewage treatment works on the River Thames, the Lee Tunnel and the Thames Tideway Tunnel which will connect to Lee Tunnel. At the heart of the Lee Tunnel is the Tideway Pumping Station, an 87m deep by 38m diameter pumping shaft, situated at Beckton STW. Its sole purpose is to transfer the tunnel’s volume into Beckton for treatment. The pumping station has been engineered to operate under the both the Lee Tunnel flows and the future Thames Tideway Tunnel loads. This paper details the operational equipment within this shaft. Pumping shaft central wall slipform - Courtesy of Thames Water Lee Tunnel overview 40% of all stormwater that ultimately flows into the River Thames, The Lee Tunnel generates the required improvement to the which equates to 16 million tonnes per year. The Lee Tunnel will London’s sewer system by removing combined discharges of carry these stormwater flows from Abbey Mills to Beckton STW, stormwater and sewage to the River Thames and lower River Lee. which has been upgraded and expanded to ensure that the facility The tunnel, which will have an internal diameter of 7.2m, is being can handle these additional loads.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 4.0\Acrobat\Plug Ins\Openall
    NBER Summer Institute - Development of the American Economy Private Water Supply in Nineteenth Century London: Re-assessing the Externalities Nicola Tynan Department of Economics George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 703-359-8876 (tel) 703-993-1133 (fax) [email protected] 25 June 2000 JEL Classification: D62, L95, N73, N83, R11 NBER Summer Institute - Development of the American Economy 2 Abstract Externalities played a major role in nineteenth century debates over private versus government ownership of water works in Britain and the US. Public health reformers argued that private water companies failed to internalize positive health externalities from filtration, wastewater removal, continuous supply and new connections. Evidence from London's experience with privately owned waterworks suggests that public health externalities from a pipe network were lower than critics assumed and were largely internalized by the companies. Negative externality shocks can be traced to rapid population growth, scientific uncertainty, and the institutional difficulties in moving from one sanitation technology to another. NBER Summer Institute - Development of the American Economy 1 1. Introduction Externalities played a primary role in nineteenth century debates over municipal versus private ownership of water works. Critics of private ownership argued that joint-stock companies failed to internalize a number of externalities, particularly the public health benefits of water supply. In many British and U.S. cities, this debate resulted in a switch from private to municipal ownership and control.1 Public health improvements in cities switching from private to public ownership provided ex post support for market failure. London's experience with private water companies throughout the nineteenth century suggests that the relationship between public health and ownership may be more complex than often assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Tunnel Main Contract Contract No 6LYG/A1
    Thames Water Utilities Ltd Major Projects Thames Tideway Tunnel Programme Lee Tunnel Main Contract Contract No 6LYG/A1 Section 4 PT – Particular Tunnelling Specification Operating Division Waste Water Services August 2008 Lee Tunnel, Contract No. 6LYG/A1 PT – Particular Tunnelling Specification - PT100 PT100 PARTICULAR TUNNELLING SPECIFICATION - INTRODUCTION PT100.1 So far as the Specification for Tunnelling may conflict, or be inconsistent, the specifications shall prevail in the following order of precedence: • Particular Tunnelling Specification • Specification for Tunnelling (BTS/ICE 2000) • Particular Civil Specification • CESWI PT100.2 Clause numbers for 'tunnelling' specifications are prefixed with a 'PT', i.e. PT112.1.4 etc. For consistency, the 'PT' prefix shall be deemed to apply also to all sections and clauses in the Specification for Tunnelling. PT100.3 Clauses for the main tunnel 7200mm diameter are prefixed PT2XX, the 3.05 ID Abbey Mills Connector Tunnel “TBM and Tunnelling” PT3XX, for the precast concrete segmental tunnel linings PT4XX, for the EPDM gaskets to the precast concrete segmental tunnel linings PT5XX and for the segmental shaft linnings PT6XX. PT100.4 This Specification for Tunnelling covers all Tunnelling Works and Segmentally lined Shafts within the scope of Works for this Project . PT100.5 Diaphragm Walls are specified in the Particular Civil Specification:-PC 3.15. PT100.6 The Contractor shall refer to the Particular Civil Specification for the requirements for all structures not specifically referenced in this specification. PT100.7 The Lee Tunnel is a long tunnel drive predominantly in flint laden chalk at high water pressures as described in the Geotechnical Baseline Report. The tunnel route prevents any direct access to the TBM from the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Reform of London: the Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/ft3x0nb131 No online items Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Processed by Special Collections staff. Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. DA676 .S26 1785 1 Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Department of Special Collections and University Archives Rare Book Division Stanford University Libraries Stanford, California Contact Information Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ Processed by: Special Collections staff Encoded by: Steven Mandeville-Gamble © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sanitary Reform of London: the working collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Date (inclusive): ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Creator: Bazalgette, Joseph Extent: 455 items Repository: Stanford University. Libraries. Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Abstract: The collection documents the history of the sanitary evolution of London from the 1840s to the early twentieth century. Some 4500 separate printed, typescript, and manuscript items trace the stages by which the drainage and fresh water supply for London was introduced-- in its time perhaps the greatest feat of urban civil engineering that had ever been undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and the Search for Public Health in London in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Medical History, 1984, 28: 250-282 WATER AND THE SEARCH FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN LONDON IN THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES by ANNE HARDY* THE history of water supplies in England is a poorly documented subject. Although various accounts of the history of water technology, and learned articles on the political and administrative aspects of water supply have been written, the history of water in relation to public health remains largely unexplored. As this is, especially concerning the nineteenth century, a voluminous subject, the present paper attempts no more than a broad survey of the process by which water came to be recognized as a vital element in public health, of the gradual discovery and application of criteria for water purity, and of the means by which supplies satisfactory in quantity and quality were obtained. The roots of the modern concern with environment and its effect on health lie in the eighteenth century, and in this period the first indications of interest in the quality and physical effects of water are found. Health and cleanliness were treated as personal matters in the eighteenth and earlier nineteenth centuries: in the first parliamentary inquiry into water quality in 1828 there is little evidence of any wider concern with the health of the general population. It was only in the later 1 830s and 1840s that the idea of public health in its widest, or modern, sense began to gain currency, and only in the second half of the nineteenth century that the term came to have, for certain social elements, a further dimension of public morality as well.
    [Show full text]
  • New Urban Demands in Early Modern London
    Medical History, Supplement No. 11, 1991: 2940. NEW URBAN DEMANDS IN EARLY MODERN LONDON Rosemary Weinstein From 1550 onwards, London grew and changed enormously, with the attendant problems of disease and disorder. The combined impact of "rapid immigration, recurrent mortality crises and population growth applied critical pressures to the social and administrative structures" ofthe metropolis.' This paper gives an overview ofhow local authorities endeavoured to deal with problems of drainage, water supply, and street cleaning between 1500 and 1700. Despite London's growth in area and population, it continued to have two separate administrative centres-the Court of Common Council in the City, and from 1585 the Court of Burgesses at Westminster. Outside the City liberties and Westminster, the Middlesex Justices of the Peace (the royal representatives) were responsible, either collectively or as individuals, for law and order. This division led to conflict over public responsibilities. The City, for example, could not compel the Middlesex Justices to clear the Fleet River above Holborn Bridge ofthe filth which polluted the downstream City ward of Farringdon Without. No single authority ran hospitals and almshouses, organized street cleaning or policed streets in the new suburbs east and west of the City-Stepney, Soho, and St James's. "Many problems of drainage and flood prevention, safe building, welfare, fire prevention, medical care and education were outside the powers of the Justices of the Peace and the parish vestries to control. Various ad hoc bodies were set up to deal with these problems",2 as we shall see. The Corporation of London has a tradition extending back to the Middle Ages of care for the health ofthe citizens.
    [Show full text]