Biological Control of Diffuse and Spotted Knapweed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Control of Diffuse and Spotted Knapweed United States Department of Agriculture Biological Control of Spotted Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Diffuse Knapweeds Service Program Aid Number 1529 Cover: Adult root-boring weevil The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cyphocleonus achates, originally from prohibits discrimination in its programs on Greece, rests on a spotted knapweed flower the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, head. Female adult weevils produce up to religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and 100 eggs. The larvae feed in the root crown marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited and below, causing a gall-like formation in bases apply to all programs.) Persons with the damaged area, reducing plant vigor, and disabilities who require alternative means for making the plant more susceptible to communication of program information disease. (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications Photo credits: Cover photograph and figures at (202) 720-5881 (voice) or (202) 720-7808 1, 6–11, 14, 16–18, 22, 24, and 27—R. D. (TDD). Richard, USDA-APHIS. Figures 5, 13, 15, 19–21, 23, 25, 26, and 29—V. J. Farquhar, To file a complaint, write the Secretary of USDA-APHIS. Figures 4 and 28—R. F. Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Lang, USDA-APHIS. Maps and graphic Washington, DC 20250, or call (202) 720- adapted from Selected Weeds of the United 7327 (voice) or (202) 720-1127 (TDD). States (U.S. Department of Agriculture USDA is an equal employment opportunity 1970). employer. Issued December 1994 2 The Problem Spotted and diffuse knapweeds (Centau- rea maculosa Lam. and C. diffusa Lam.) have infested millions of acres of rangeland in the United States. These invasive, exotic perennial weeds have reduced the carrying capacity of native rangelands by up to 90 percent. The weeds have very low palatability to both livestock and wildlife and have severely diminished the quality of wildlife habitat and the returns from livestock produc- tion. In Montana alone, a 1984 report estimated the value of annual forage losses caused by knapweeds to be $4.5 million (Bucher 1984). Figure 1—Spotted knapweed may be attractive to the uninitiated but is a menace to livestock range and wildlife habitat. 3 Herbicide control of these weeds is Figure 2—Spotted fairly effective but can be cost prohibi- knapweed was first introduced from Eurasia in tive for several reasons. First, the contaminated alfalfa and weeds’ numerous seeds have a unique clover seed around 1893. ability to stay dormant in the soil for 8 to Although scattered 10 years. Therefore, chemicals must be populations are found in at least 34 States, spotted used in successive years to exhaust the knapweed infests in excess “seed bank” in the soil. Second, of 7.25 million acres in just because the weeds now occupy a vast 8 States and the Canadian expanse of dry mountainous rangeland Provinces of British Columbia and Alberta. of limited value, chemical control may not be economically feasible for most landowners. Knapweeds’ growth in rough terrain further complicates chemical control. To reduce these problems, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is conducting a major biological control Figure 3—Diffuse knapweed, first reported in program that involves importing, Washington in 1907, propagating, and distributing the weeds’ currently covers more than natural enemies. Biological control 3.21 million acres in 10 specialists in USDA’s Animal and Plant States and the southern part of British Columbia. Health Inspection Service (APHIS) are concentrating on insects that have evolved to feed only on spotted and diffuse knapweeds. Collectively, the feeding insects inhibit the weeds’ growth and reproduction, reducing the plants’ ability to compete with desirable native range plants. 4 Figure 4—An old sewer line presents a perfect opportunity for spotted knapweed to Figure 7—The basal leaves of the knap- establish itself. Spotted and diffuse Figure 6—Stems of spotted knapweed weed rosette grow up to 6 inches long and knapweeds thrive in dry, sandy soils in old terminate in a solitary pink or purple flower. divide into leaflets along a common axis. fields or disturbed sites, such as roadsides, The well-developed taproot system enables gravel pits, or abandoned railway beds. the plant to survive in dry areas. Although selective overgrazing of fall, the stems become brittle and the desirable native vegetation by herbi- seedheads break off easily. Automobiles vores enhances the knapweeds’ ability driven through such weed patches can to invade rangeland, the weeds’ transport the noxious weed seeds for success is primarily the result of their many miles into previously uninfested prolific seed production and ability to areas. In diffuse knapweed’s case, the distribute the seeds. Each flower plants may break off at the base and produces 12–35 seeds, resulting in blow in the wind for a short distance, 400–25,000 seeds per plant, depending shaking out their seeds as they tumble upon the soil moisture available to the along. plant. When the seeds ripen in early Figure 5—These mature spotted knapweed heads have already distributed most of their seeds. 5 Figure 9—The seed, tipped with a tuft of bristles, measures about 1/8 inch long. Figure 11—The flower of the diffuse knapweed plant is generally white but can be lavender or purple. Figure 8—Plants of spotted knapweed have Figure 10—Plants of diffuse knapweed, one or more stems that branch 1–3 feet tall. more branched than those of spotted knapweed, grow 1–2 feet tall. Compared to spotted knapweed, the leaves of diffuse knapweed are small, and the numerous flower heads are narrow with spiny bracts. 6 Biological Control In Europe and Asia, where spotted and diffuse knapweeds originated, sufficient natural enemies have developed over time to keep the knapweeds in balance with other plants native to those areas. Where insects and disease have stressed the knapweeds, the weeds are 13-A nothing more than wild flowers and exert Line Art no detrimental effects. However, because the weeds invaded North America without their natural enemies, they have reproduced unchecked here for more than 100 years. USDA, APHIS—in cooperation with scientists in the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Agricultural Experiment Stations (AES), and Interna- tional Institute of Biological Control (IIBC) —has imported, propagated, and redistributed hundreds of thousands of Figure 12—Location of biocontrol agent-induced damage on spotted and biological control agents. Scientists diffuse knapweed plants. employed by these agencies scour the European landscape for new species of both species of knapweed, but a few are burrow into the root, they allow naturally beneficial insects. This extensive program specific to just diffuse knapweed. The occurring soil components such as fungi relies upon cooperation from many insects work together by feeding on the and bacteria to enter the plant’s system, Federal and State agencies, along with seeds or in the roots of the weeds. Each further weakening the plant. private landowners. attack reduces the knapweeds’ defenses Eventually, scientists hope to propa- Currently, there are 12 beneficial insect by inhibiting seed production, either from gate and redistribute sufficient insect species from Europe cleared by USDA direct destruction of seeds or by stunting populations to hold spotted and diffuse for release in the United States. Most of overall growth and strength of the plant. knapweeds to tolerable levels similar to these biological control agents attack In some cases, when the insect larvae their population in Europe. 7 Root-Boring Insects Larvae of these insects mine the root of the plant, reducing storage capacity and increasing susceptibility to infection from fungi or bacteria. Plants attacked before they reach the critical size for flowering experience delayed bolting for 1 or more years, reducing flowering and production. Continued feeding by root-mining insects on weakened plants kills the weeds. Larvae of Cyphocleonus achates (cover photo) feed in the root crown and below, causing a gall-like formation in the damaged area. Pterolonche inspersa (fig. 15), a brown moth from the northeastern Mediterranean region, and Sphenoptera jugoslavica (fig. 16), a European buprestid beetle, are both specific to diffuse knapweed. Their Figure 13—Agapeta zoegana, a bright yellow moth, originates from the larvae mine the root of diffuse knap- Mediterranean region of Europe. weed, reducing plant vitality and providing a port of entry for fungal infection. Figure 14—Agapeta zoegana larvae possess the ability to move from one root to another upon depleting the food supply. Several larvae can occupy large roots. 8 Figure 16—Sphenoptera jugoslavica adult beetle. Figure 17—Sphenoptera jugoslavica larva mining the taproot of diffuse knapweed. Figure 15—Pterolonche inspersa adult moth. 9 Seedhead Insects Larvae of these species can consume the entire contents of immature knap- weed seedheads, including the seeds, florets, and portions of the receptacle. Most of the larvae of these species also cause gall-like structures in the seedhead. These galls are formed by the plant in response to the larval feeding and further deplete the plant’s resources. Figure 19—Two U. affinis galls flank an exposed larva. The larvae of U. affinis and U. quadrifasciata inhibit seed production. In the process, they form a gall inside the seedhead, which depletes the plant’s energy resources. Figure 20—Terellia virens, originating from the Mediterranean region, joins Chaetorellia acrolophi as APHIS’ two newest weapons against knapweeds. Originally introduced in 1993, T. virens’ larvae also attack the young seeds, burrowing inside and consuming the germ. In addition, the adult flies feed on the knapweed flowers. Figure 18—Urophora affinis adult fly. Figure 21—Chaetorellia acrolophi, from U. affinis and U. quadrifasciata are the most western Switzerland, can lay up to 12 eggs widely distributed of all the knapweed per day.
Recommended publications
  • Assessing Population Sizes, Biological Potential and Mass
    1. ASSESSING POPULATION SIZES, BIOCONTROL POTENTIAL AND MASS PRODUCTION OF THE ROOT BORING MOTH AGAPETA ZOEGANA FOR AREWIDE IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING OF SPOTTED KNAPWEED BIOCONTROL 2. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Mark Schwarzländer, PSES Department, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter DR MS 2339, Moscow, ID 83844-2339, (208) 885-9319, FAX (208)885- 7760, [email protected]; Joseph Milan, USDI Bureau of Land Management, 3948 Development Ave., Boise, ID 83705, (208) 384-3487, FAX (208) 384-3326, [email protected]; Paul Brusven, Nez Perce Tribe Bio-Control Center, P.O. Box 365, 22776 Beaver Road, Lapwai, ID 83540, (208) 843-9374, FAX (208) 843-9373, [email protected] 3. COOPERATORS: Dr. Hariet Hinz (CABI Switzerland), Dr. Urs Schaffner (CABI Switzerland, Dr. Sanford Eigenbrode (University of Idaho), Dr. Heinz Müller-Schärer (University of Fribourg, Switzerland), Brian Marschmann (USDA APHIS PPQ State Director, Idaho), Dr. Rich Hansen (USDA APHIS CPHST, Ft. Collins, Colorado), John (Lewis) Cook (USDI BIA Rocky Mountain Region, Billings, Montana), Dr. John Gaskin (USDA ARS NPARL, Sidney, Montana), Idaho County Weed Superintendents and Idaho-based USFS land managers. BCIP CONTACT: Carol Randall, USFS Northern and Intermountain Regions, 2502 E Sherman Ave, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814, (208) 769-3051, (208) 769-3062, [email protected] 4. REQUESTED FUNDS: USFS $100,000 (Year 1: $34,000; Year 2: $33,000; and Year 3: $33,000), Project Leveraging: University of Idaho $124,329. 5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 1) The current status of ecological research suggests that albeit having some impact on spotted knapweed, both, A. zoegana and C. achates have stronger negative effects on native grasses, thus indirectly benefiting one of most devastating invasive plants in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Seed Head–Attacking Biological Control Agents
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROLÑWEEDS Influence of Seed Head–Attacking Biological Control Agents on Spotted Knapweed Reproductive Potential in Western Montana Over a 30-Year Period 1,2 3 1 1 JIM M. STORY, LINCOLN SMITH, JANELLE G. CORN, AND LINDA J. WHITE Environ. Entomol. 37(2): 510Ð519 (2008) ABSTRACT Five insect biological control agents that attack ßower heads of spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe L. subsp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek, became established in western Montana between 1973 and 1992. In a controlled Þeld experiment in 2006, seed-head insects reduced spotted knapweed seed production per seed head by 84.4%. The seed production at two sites in western Montana where these biological control agents were well established was 91.6Ð93.8% lower in 2004Ð2005 than 1974Ð1975, whereas the number of seed heads per square meter was 70.7% lower, and the reproductive potential (seeds/m2) was 95.9Ð99.0% lower. The average seed bank in 2005 at four sites containing robust spotted knapweed populations was 281 seeds/m2 compared with 19 seeds/m2 at four sites where knapweed density has declined. Seed bank densities were much higher at sites in central Montana (4,218 seeds/m2), where the insects have been established for a shorter period. Urophora affinis Frauenfeld was the most abundant species at eight study sites, infesting 66.7% of the seed heads, followed by a 47.3% infestation by Larinus minutus Gyllenhal and L. obtusus Gyllenhal. From 1974 to 1985, Urophora spp. apparently reduced the number of seeds per seed head by 34.5Ð46.9%; the addition of Larinus spp. further reduced seed numbers 84.2Ð90.5% by 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Weed Control Project Western WA
    Integrated Weed Control Project – Western Washington Non-native invasive plant species threaten biological diversity, decrease forage and habitat for wildlife and livestock, increase wind and water erosion and decrease land values throughout Washington. Many years of manual and chemical control are required to impact large infested areas, which results in significant expenses for landowners and public agencies. Biological control offers an inexpensive control method that can provide long-term weed suppression. Biocontrol agents are self-perpetuating and can disperse to new and undetected weed infestations or those difficult to reach with other control practices. J.Andreas Although it can take agents several years to establish and begin impacting weed infestations, biocontrol is often a highly effective tool and in many cases is the best management option. Stem-mining beetle on Dalmatian toadflax. WSU Extension heads the Integrated Weed Control Project (IWCP) aimed at promoting the use of biocontrol agents for invasive plant management. Project Goals: • Establish biocontrol agents and manage them on a statewide scale to suppress noxious weeds. • Increase public awareness of the benefits and appropriate use of biocontrol as part of an integrated management strategy. • Foster and expand the westside component of the statewide project by providing biocontrol agents, information and expertise to land-managers from county, state and federal agencies, conservation organizations, tribes and private and industry landowners. IWCP in Thurston County County Highlights! The IWCP partners with the Thurston • An hour-long television County Noxious Weed Control Program to special featuring the provide biocontrol education and TCNWCP, The Nature implementation in the region. The TCNWCP Conservancy and the finds suitable release sites through field IWCP aired on Thurston surveys and works with IWCP personnel County TV over 20 times to redistribute biocontrol agents throughout since July 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Twin Falls District Noxious Weed and Invasive
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Twin Falls District Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant Treatment DOI-BLM-ID-T000-2012-0001-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Twin Falls District 2878 Addison Avenue East Twin Falls, ID 83301 Phone: (208) 735-2060 FAX: (208) 735-2076 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................. 13 Background ............................................................................................................................... 13 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 14 Location of Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 15 Purpose and Need for Action .................................................................................................... 19 Conformance with Applicable Land Use Plans ........................................................................ 19 FMDA ................................................................................................................................... 20 Jarbidge RMP........................................................................................................................ 20 Craters of the Moon Monument MP ..................................................................................... 21 Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Biological Control on Two Knapweed Species in British Columbia
    Impact of Biological Control on Two Knapweed Research Report Species in British Columbia Don Gayton, FORREX & Val Miller, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Abstract Diffuse and spotted knapweed ( Centaurea diffusa Lam and C. stoebe L.) are two closely re - lated invasives found in many parts of British Columbia’s Southern Interior, causing sub - stantial economic losses in rangelands. Beginning in 1970, the provincial government initiated a long-term biological control effort against the knapweeds, introducing 10 dif - ferent insect agents from 1970 to 1987. In an effort to evaluate the efficacy of the program, archival (1983–2008) data was amassed from 19 vegetation monitoring sites that contained knapweed. In 2010, these sites were relocated and re-monitored and cover values were an - alyzed. Diffuse knapweed showed significant declines at 14 of 15 sites; spotted knapweed declined at three of four sites. Possible alternative explanations for the decline are dis - cussed. Evidence strongly points to a suite of biocontrol agents (seed feeders and root feed - ers) as the primary drivers of knapweed decline in British Columbia’s Southern Interior. KEYWORDS : biological control; British Columbia; Centaurea ; knapweed; monitoring Introduction iffuse knapweed ( Centaurea diffusa Lam.) and spotted knapweed ( Centaurea stoebe L.) are two introduced, closely related invasive forbs. These species are most com - Dmon in the northwestern United States and in western Canada. Centaurea stoebe (also referred to as C. maculosa Lam. and C. biebersteinii DC) is particularly widespread, reported in 45 US states and all provinces of Canada (Marshall 2004; Zouhar 2001). The drought-tolerant C. diffusa has an altitudinal range of 150–900 m, whereas C.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Knapweeds
    Biology, Ecology and Management of Montana Knapweeds EB0204 revised August 2017 Celestine Duncan, Consultant, Weed Management Services, Helena, MT Jim Story, Research Professor, retired, MSU Western Ag Research Center, Corvallis, MT Roger Sheley, former MSU Extension Weed Specialist, Bozeman, MT revised by Hilary Parkinson, former MSU Research Associate, and Jane Mangold, MSU Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Table of Contents Plant Biology . 3 SpeedyWeed ID . 5 Ecology . 4 Habitat . 4 Spread and Establishment Potential . 6 Damage Potential . 7 Origins, Current Status and Distribution . 8 Management Alternatives . 8 Prevention . 8 Mechanical Control . .9 Cultural Control . .10 Biological Control . .11 Chemical Control . .14 Integrated Weed Management (IWM) . 16 Additional Resources . 17 Acknowledgements . .19 COVER PHOTOS large - spotted knapweed by Marisa Williams, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, bugwood.org top inset - diffuse knapweed by Cindy Roche, bugwood.org bottom inset - Russain knapweed by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, bugwood.org Any mention of products in this publication does not constitute a recommendation by Montana State University Extension. It is a violation of Federal law to use herbicides in a manner inconsistent with their labeling. Copyright © 2017 MSU Extension The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Montana State University and Montana State University Extension prohibit discrimination in all of their programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital and family status. Issued in furtherance of cooperative extension work in agriculture and home economics, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jeff Bader, Director of Extension, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS SUDAN January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/31E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department Overview of forest pests – Sudan DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in the Sudan. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). ii Overview of forest pests – Sudan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests and diseases................................................................................................. 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos
    Species: Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/cenmac/all.html SPECIES: Centaurea maculosa Introductory Distribution and occurrence Management Considerations Botanical and ecological characteristics Fire ecology Fire effects References INTRODUCTORY SPECIES: Centaurea maculosa AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION SYNONYMS NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY LIFE FORM FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS OTHER STATUS AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Zouhar, Kris. 2001. Centaurea maculosa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, September 24]. FEIS ABBREVIATION: CENMAC SYNONYMS: Centaurea biebersteinii DC. [82] Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek [137] NRCS PLANT CODE [212]: CEBI2 1 of 58 9/24/2007 4:04 PM Species: Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/cenmac/all.html COMMON NAMES: spotted knapweed TAXONOMY: The scientific name for spotted knapweed is Centaurea maculosa Lam. (Asteraceae) [45,67,217,233]. Oschmann [137] suggests that in North America, the name Centaurea maculosa has been misapplied to Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos. The taxonomy of spotted knapweed is discussed in Ochsmann [137] and on the Centaurea website. Oschsmann [136] also cites evidence of hybridization between spotted and diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) in at least 7 U.S. states. The hybrid is named Centaurea × psammogena Gayer. LIFE FORM: Forb FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS: No special status OTHER STATUS: Spotted knapweed has been declared a noxious or restricted weed in at least 15 states in the U.S. and 4 Canadian provinces [213].
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Morphology of Immature Stages of Coniocleonus Nigrosuturatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixinae)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 30.iv.2014 Volume 54(1), pp. 337–354 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D1FF3534-A1C8-4B2B-ACDF-69F31ED12BC0 Biology and morphology of immature stages of Coniocleonus nigrosuturatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixinae) Robert STEJSKAL1), Filip TRNKA2) & JiĜí SKUHROVEC3) 1) Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, ZemČdČlská 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, & Administration of Podyji National Park, Na Vyhlídce 5, CZ-669 02 Znojmo, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Department of Ecology & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, TĜ. Svobody 26, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic; e-mail: ¿ [email protected] 3) Group Function of invertebrate and plant biodiversity in agro-ecosystems, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, CZ-161 06 Praha 6 – RuzynČ, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Mature larvae and pupae of Coniocleonus (Plagiographus) nigrosutura- tus (Goeze, 1777) (Curculionidae: Lixinae: Cleonini) are described and compared with three other cleonine taxa with known larvae. The biology of the species was studied in Romania, Hungary and Slovakia. Common Stork’s-bill (Erodium cicu- tarium) (Geraniaceae) is identi¿ ed as a host plant of both larvae and adults of this weevil. The weevil is very likely monophagous, and previous records of thyme (Thymus sp., Lamiaceae) as the host plant hence appear incorrect. Coniocleonus nigrosuturatus prefers dry, sunny places in grassland habitats, with sparse vegeta- tion, bare ground and patchily growing host plants. Overwintering beetles emerge in early spring (March), feed and mate on the host plants. The highest activity of adults was observed from mid-April to mid-May.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Noxious Weeds in Oregon
    Biological Control of What is Biological Weed Control? DALMATIAN TOADFLAX GORSE Linaria dalmatica Ulex europaeus Invasive noxious weeds in Oregon cost millions of dollars It is important to make sure the correct species of biocontrol Key to Biocontrol Agent Status Noxious Weeds in Oregon in economic and environmental damage. Biological agents are released, to use the most effective species, and to Gorse seed weevil control is a tool vegetation managers employ to help The following general information is provided for each document the release and establishment of weed biocontrol Exapion ulicis naturally suppress weed infestations. This pamphlet agents. biocontrol agent. shows many of the common biological agents you may Year: 1956 Distribution: Widespread A guide to common biological Since 1947, 77 species of biocontrol agents have been released Year: Year of introduction. encounter in Oregon. Attack rate: Heavy Control: Good control agents found in Oregon in Oregon against 32 species of targeted weeds. A total of Distribution: Distribution of agent in host infested counties. Collectability: Mass Release No. 100 Classical biological control is the use of selected natural Dalmatian toadflax stem weevil 67 species are established. The majority of the bioagents Widespread >50% Limited <50% Timing: Apr–May Method: Sweep net/ enemies to control targeted weeds. Most of our worst are insects (71), plus three mites, one nematode, and two Mecinus janthiniformis racquet Stage: Adult Comment: No need for Attack rate: noxious weeds originated from other continents. pathogens. Successful projects can generate 15:1 benefit to Percent of plants attacked. Year: 2001 Distribution: Widespread redistribution. Prospective biocontrol agents are thoroughly tested to cost ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Biocontrol: Extended Abstracts from the 1997 Interagency Noxious-Weed Symposium
    Weed Biocontrol: Extended Abstracts from the 1997 Interagency Noxious-Weed Symposium Dennis Isaacson Martha H. Brookes Technical Coordinators U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Morgantown, WV and Oregon Department of Agriculture Salem, OR June 1999 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many of the tasks of organizing a symposium such as this — and there are many — are not obvious, and, if they are handled well, the effort that goes into them can easily be overlooked. Sherry Kudna of the Oregon Department of Agriculture Weed Control staff managed most of the arrangements and took care of many, many details, which helped the symposium run smoothly. We truly appreciate her many contributions. We also acknowledge the contributions of the presenters. They not only organized their own presentations and manuscripts, but also assisted with reviewing drafts of each other’s papers in the proceedings. Several of the presenters also covered their own expenses. Such dedication speaks well of their commitment to improving the practice of weed biocontrol. Both the Oregon State Office of the Bureau of Land Management and the USDA Forest Service made major contributions to supporting the symposium. Although several individuals from both organizations provided assistance, we especially note the encouragement and advice of Bob Bolton, Oregon Bureau of Land Management Weed Control Coordinator, and the willingness to help and financial support for publishing this document from Richard C. Reardon, Biocontrol/Biopesticides Program Manager, USDA Forest Service's Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV. We thank Tinathan Coger for layout and design and Patricia Dougherty for printing advice and coordination of the manuscript We also thank Barbra Mullin, Montana State Department of Agriculture, who delivered the keynote address; Tami Lowry, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, who helped format the document; and Eric Coombs, who provided the photographs of weeds and agents that convey the concepts of weed biocontrol.
    [Show full text]