DOCSLIB.ORG

(Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos) Biological Control Insects in Michigan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos) Biological Control Insects in Michigan View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Valparaiso University The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 47 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2014 Numbers 3 & Article 3 4 - Fall/Winter 2014 October 2014 Establishment, Impacts, and Current Range of Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos) Biological Control Insects in Michigan B. D. Carson Michigan State University C. A. Bahlai Missouri State University D. A. Landis Michigan State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Carson, B. D.; Bahlai, C. A.; and Landis, D. A. 2014. "Establishment, Impacts, and Current Range of Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos) Biological Control Insects in Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 47 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol47/iss2/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Carson et al.: Establishment, Impacts, and Current Range of Spotted Knapweed (<i 2014 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 129 Establishment, Impacts, and Current Range of Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos) Biological Control Insects in Michigan B. D. Carson1, C. A. Bahlai1, and D. A. Landis1* Abstract Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (spotted knapweed) is an invasive plant that has been the target of classical biological control in North America for more than four decades. Work in the western U.S. and Canada has shown the seedhead-feeding weevils Larinus minutus Gyllenhal and Larinus obtusus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and the root-boring weevil Cyphocleonus achates (Fahraeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to be the most effective C. stoebe control agents. These three weevils have recently been introduced into the eastern U.S., including sites in Michigan in 2007 and 2009. In 2010, we made additional releases at six sites in Michigan, monitoring them for three years 2011-13. Here we report on the establishment, impact, and cur- rent range of L. minutus, L. obtusus, and C. achates in Michigan. We also report on the initial results of native plant overseeding treatments that were applied to biological control release sites with the aim of supplementing the nectar source C. stoebe provides. We found that L. minutus has established at all of its Michigan release sites and is widespread in the southwestern part of the state, while L. obtusus has established at the single site where it was released in 2007 and is spreading to adjoining counties. We also found C. achates to be present at four sites and established at one additional site in Michigan, but in all cases abundances are low and dispersal has been minimal (< 10 m). In the three years following the 2010 releases, we found no measurable impacts of these biological control agents on C. stoebe growth, demographics, or plant community metrics. We also found little evidence of native flowering plant establishment at seeded sites. These baseline data will be useful in monitoring the spread and potential impacts of biological control agents on C. stoebe in Michigan. ____________________ Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (spotted knapweed) is an herbaceous plant native to southern and eastern Europe. In its home range, the species occurs at relatively low densities and is well integrated into grassland communities (Sheley et al. 1998). In contrast, C. stoebe is considered highly invasive in North America and frequently becomes the dominant species in grassland, rangeland, and old field habitats. Populations ofC. stoebe are now found throughout much of the continental United States, with the exceptions of Texas, Oklahoma, and Mississippi (USDA 2013). Long considered a pest in western U.S. rangelands, it is estimated that C. stoebe costs ranchers as much as $155 million in annual gross revenue in Montana alone (Griffith and Lacey 1991). Infestations of C. stoebe have also been shown to cause dramatic decreases in plant diversity, ecosystem functioning, and utilization of land by wild and domesticated foraging animals (Watson and Renney 1974, Hakim 1979, Lacey et al. 1989, Sheley et al. 1998, Mummey and Rillig 2006). More recently, C. stoebe has also become a serious invader in the eastern and midwestern U.S., 1 Michigan State University, Department of Entomology, 204 CIPS, 576 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824. *Corresponding author: (e-mail: [email protected]). Published by ValpoScholar, 2014 1 The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 47, No. 2 [2014], Art. 3 130 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 47, Nos. 3 - 4 threatening the ecological integrity of natural areas. In Michigan, C. stoebe has been documented as an invader of rare native ecosystems, including dry sand and dry-mesic prairies (Kost 2004), mesic sand prairies (Kost and Slaughter 2009), dry-mesic southern forests (Lee 2007), oak barrens (Cohen 2001), oak-pine barrens (Cohen 2000), and open dunes, where it is often considered a primary threat to biodiversity (Albert 1999). At the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in northern Michigan, Marshall and Storer (2008) found that C. stoebe invasion of open dune habitats had adverse effects on native plant communities and altered insect community composition. Despite the efforts of land managers, conventional control methods, in- cluding herbicides and mowing, have not adequately controlled the spread of C. stoebe. In the U.S., western states, notably Montana, Colorado, and Wash- ington, have spearheaded the effort to use classical biological control to slow and reverse the invasion of C. stoebe and Centaurea diffusa (diffuse knapweed) (Watson and Renney 1974, Story and Anderson 1978, Sheley and Jacobs 1997, Corn et al. 2009). More recently, agencies in the eastern U.S. have begun making their own biological control releases targeting C. stoebe (http://www.biocontrol. entomology.cornell.edu/weedfeed/Larinus). Biological control of C. stoebe in Michigan began with the release of two spe- cies of seedhead flies,Urophora affinis Frauenfeld and Urophora quadrifasciata Meigen (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Isabella County in 1994 by USDA APHIS PPQ. Subsequent surveys in 1998-2000 detected U. quadrifasciata in all 83 Michi- gan counties and U. affinis in 24 counties (Lang et al. 2001). A 2009 survey by Landis and Sebolt (unpub. data) showed that both seedhead flies remain widely established in both peninsulas in Michigan. While seedhead infestation rates in Michigan are high (U. quadrifasciata averaged 78.1% and U. affinis averaged 52.5% in 2009), C. stoebe densities also remain high, confirming the reported inef- ficiency of these two agents in controllingC. stoebe (Myers et al. 2009). The introduction history of the two seedhead-feeding weevils and root- boring weevil for biological control of C. stoebe in Michigan is complex. Based on the request of commercial biological control agent suppliers, in 2007, USDA- APHIS issued permits for the interstate transport of the root-boring weevil Cyphocleonus achates (Fahraeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and the two seedhead-feeding weevils, Larinus minutus Gyllenhal, and Larinus obtusus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), into Michigan. Releases of these insects were subsequently made at two sites in southern Michigan by private and public land managers (Table 1). However, due to the concerns of commercial beekeepers in Michigan, who value C. stoebe as a midsummer nectar source, further issuance of biological control agent release permits was suspended in 2008. In 2009, the USDA-Forest Service requested and received a permit to conduct controlled releases of C. achates and L. minutus in the western part of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. While performing preliminary searches for C. stoebe biological control insects in 2011, we unexpectedly found L. minutus in two Michigan counties near the Indiana border, ca. 60 km from any known Michigan release sites. After additional investigation, we discovered that the Indiana Department of Natural Resources had made releases of L. minutus and C. achates in Bristol, Indiana, at a site 2.5 km from the Michigan border (Van Driesche et al. 2002). These releases were made in 1996, and we concluded that they are the most likely source of the L. minutus population occurring in southwestern Michigan (Carson and Landis, in review). Following the 2007 and 2009 Michigan releases, interest in C. stoebe bio- logical control increased, and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) contracted with Michigan State University to establish biological control research sites on MDNR lands. In 2010, we made releases at six MDNR managed sites in Michigan, monitoring them for agent establishment and https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol47/iss2/3 2 Published byValpoScholar, 2014 2014 Table 1. Sites and species of C. stoebe biological control weevils released in Michigan and bordering states. These include a 1997 release made by the Indiana DNR, two 2007 releases made by private landholders, a 2009 release made by the USFS, and six 2010 releases made by MSU. Carson etal.:Establishment,Impacts,andCurrentRangeofSpottedKnapweed(<i Year of Larinus Larinus Cyphocleonus Site Name County Release minutus obtusus achates Longitude Latitude Elkhart (Indiana) 1996 + - + W85.77141 N41.73578 THE GRE Lake Orion Oakland 2007 + - + W83.29482 N42.75865 Kalamazoo Kalamazoo 2007 - + + W85.76245 N42.28951 ENTOMOLOGIST LAKES AT Iron, Gogebic, Ottawa National Houghton 2009 + - + Not available Not available Seney North Schoolcraft 2010 + - + W86.04817 N46.34626 Seney South Schoolcraft 2010 + - + W86.05508 N46.34072 Camp Grayling Crawford 2010 + - + W84.62825 N44.78453 Houghton Lake Roscommon 2010 + - + W84.89275 N44.31051 Flat River Ionia 2010 + - + W85.21220 N43.12400 Sharonville Jackson 2010 + - + W84.14593 N42.19637 131 3 The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 47, No. 2 [2014], Art. 3 132 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 47, Nos. 3 - 4 impact for three years during 2011–13.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing Population Sizes, Biological Potential and Mass
    1. ASSESSING POPULATION SIZES, BIOCONTROL POTENTIAL AND MASS PRODUCTION OF THE ROOT BORING MOTH AGAPETA ZOEGANA FOR AREWIDE IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING OF SPOTTED KNAPWEED BIOCONTROL 2. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Mark Schwarzländer, PSES Department, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter DR MS 2339, Moscow, ID 83844-2339, (208) 885-9319, FAX (208)885- 7760, [email protected]; Joseph Milan, USDI Bureau of Land Management, 3948 Development Ave., Boise, ID 83705, (208) 384-3487, FAX (208) 384-3326, [email protected]; Paul Brusven, Nez Perce Tribe Bio-Control Center, P.O. Box 365, 22776 Beaver Road, Lapwai, ID 83540, (208) 843-9374, FAX (208) 843-9373, [email protected] 3. COOPERATORS: Dr. Hariet Hinz (CABI Switzerland), Dr. Urs Schaffner (CABI Switzerland, Dr. Sanford Eigenbrode (University of Idaho), Dr. Heinz Müller-Schärer (University of Fribourg, Switzerland), Brian Marschmann (USDA APHIS PPQ State Director, Idaho), Dr. Rich Hansen (USDA APHIS CPHST, Ft. Collins, Colorado), John (Lewis) Cook (USDI BIA Rocky Mountain Region, Billings, Montana), Dr. John Gaskin (USDA ARS NPARL, Sidney, Montana), Idaho County Weed Superintendents and Idaho-based USFS land managers. BCIP CONTACT: Carol Randall, USFS Northern and Intermountain Regions, 2502 E Sherman Ave, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814, (208) 769-3051, (208) 769-3062, [email protected] 4. REQUESTED FUNDS: USFS $100,000 (Year 1: $34,000; Year 2: $33,000; and Year 3: $33,000), Project Leveraging: University of Idaho $124,329. 5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 1) The current status of ecological research suggests that albeit having some impact on spotted knapweed, both, A. zoegana and C. achates have stronger negative effects on native grasses, thus indirectly benefiting one of most devastating invasive plants in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Knapweed Centaurea Stoebe Ssp. Micranthos (Gugler) Hayek
    spotted knapweed Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek Synonyms: Acosta maculosa auct. non Holub, Centaurea biebersteinii DC., C. maculosa auct. non Lam, C. maculosa ssp. micranthos G. Gmelin ex Gugler Other common names: None Family: Asteraceae Invasiveness Rank: 86 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description Ecological Impact Spotted knapweed is a biennial to short-lived perennial Impact on community composition, structure, and plant. Stems are 30½ to 91 cm tall and generally interactions: Spotted knapweed often forms dense branched. Rosette leaves are compound with several stands in natural communities. Infestations reduce the irregularly lobed segments. Stem leaves are alternate, 5 vigor of native plants, decrease the species diversity of to 15 cm long, more or less hairy, and resin-dotted. plant communities, and degrade the forage quality of Lower stem leaves are narrowly divided, while the wildlife habitats. Winter-ranging elk may avoid foraging upper stem leaves are undivided. Flower heads are 19 to in spotted knapweed dominated communities (Rice et al. 25½ mm wide and are composed of purple disc florets 1997). Knapweeds are allelopathic, inhibiting the (Royer and Dickinson 1999, Whitson et al. 2000). establishment and growth of surrounding vegetation (Whitson et al. 2000). Impact on ecosystem processes: Infestations of spotted knapweed have been shown to increase the erosion of topsoil.
    [Show full text]
  • Squarrose Knapweed EXOTIC Centaurea Virgata Ssp
    southwestlearning.org AME R ICAN SOUTHWEST SPECIES FACT SHEET Asteraceae (Sunflower family) Squarrose Knapweed EXOTIC Centaurea virgata ssp. squarrosa At a Glance • Perennial • Highly branched stems that grow one to three feet tall. SITY • Lower leaves are deeply dissected, but the upper leaves R are entire and linear. • Flowers are pink to pale-purple. • Flowerheads have four to eight florets and appear more slender than the flowerheads of other knapweeds. • The bracts underneath the flower have a central spine that curves backwards. • Fruit is a golden to dark-brown achene. UNIVE STATE UTAH / DEWEY STEVE The bracts underneath the flower of squarrose knapweed have Habitat and Ecology a central spine that curves backwards. Squarrose knapweed (Centaurea virgata ssp. squarrosa) is present in Utah, Nevada, California, Oregon, Wisconsin, spotted (Centaurea maculosa) or diffuse knapweed (Cen- and Michigan. How it was introduced to North America is taurea diffusa). Squarrose knapweed is not palatable to unknown. Squarrose knapweed often grows on degraded livestock and can form monocultures. Its taxonomic status rangeland soils and tolerates drought and cold better than is uncertain: it is also known as Centaurea squarrosa and Centaurea virgata. Description Squarrose knapweed is a long-lived perennial with highly branched stems that grow one to three feet tall. The stems grow above a woody crown and stout taproot. Under unfa- vorable conditions, the plants remain as basal rosettes be- fore developing flowering stems. Squarrose knapweed re- produces by seed. The seed head falls near the parent plant, but the backwards-curved spines under the seed head can cling to hair, wool, fur, and clothing, allowing the seeds to disperse over greater distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment: Centaurea Calcitrapa
    Weed Risk Assessment: Centaurea calcitrapa 1. Plant Details Taxonomy: Centaurea calcitrapa L. Family Asteraceae. Common names: star thistle, purple star thistle, red star thistle. Origins: Native to Europe (Hungary, Switzerland, Czechoslovakia, Russian Federation, Ukraine, Albania, Greece, Italy, Romania, Yugoslavia, France, Portugal, Spain), Macaronesia (Canary Islands, Madeira Islands), temperate Asia (Cyprus, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey) and North Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia) (GRIN database). Naturalised Distribution: Naturalised in New Zealand, South Africa, Central America, South America, the United States of America (eg. naturalised in 14 states, mostly in northwest including California, Idaho, Washington, Wyoming, New Mexico, Oregon, Arizona) (USDA plants database), and Australia (GRIN database). Description: C. calcitrapa is an erect, bushy and spiny biannual herb that is sometimes behaves as an annual or short-lived perennial. It grows to 1 m tall. Young stems and leaves have fine, cobweb-like hairs that fall off over time. Older stems are much-branched, straggly, woody, sparsely hairy, without wings or spines and whitish to pale green. Lower leaves are deeply divided while upper leaves are generally narrow and undivided. Rosette leaves are deeply divided and older rosettes have a circle of spines in the centre. This is the initial, infertile, flower head. Numerous flowers are produced on the true flowering stem and vary from lavender to a deep purple colour. Bracts end in a sharp, rigid white to yellow spines. Seed is straw coloured and blotched with dark brown spots. The pappus is reduced or absent. Bristles are absent. Seeds are 3-4mm long, smooth and ovoid. The root is a fleshy taproot (Parsons and Cuthbertson, 2001) (Moser, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Weed Control Project Western WA
    Integrated Weed Control Project – Western Washington Non-native invasive plant species threaten biological diversity, decrease forage and habitat for wildlife and livestock, increase wind and water erosion and decrease land values throughout Washington. Many years of manual and chemical control are required to impact large infested areas, which results in significant expenses for landowners and public agencies. Biological control offers an inexpensive control method that can provide long-term weed suppression. Biocontrol agents are self-perpetuating and can disperse to new and undetected weed infestations or those difficult to reach with other control practices. J.Andreas Although it can take agents several years to establish and begin impacting weed infestations, biocontrol is often a highly effective tool and in many cases is the best management option. Stem-mining beetle on Dalmatian toadflax. WSU Extension heads the Integrated Weed Control Project (IWCP) aimed at promoting the use of biocontrol agents for invasive plant management. Project Goals: • Establish biocontrol agents and manage them on a statewide scale to suppress noxious weeds. • Increase public awareness of the benefits and appropriate use of biocontrol as part of an integrated management strategy. • Foster and expand the westside component of the statewide project by providing biocontrol agents, information and expertise to land-managers from county, state and federal agencies, conservation organizations, tribes and private and industry landowners. IWCP in Thurston County County Highlights! The IWCP partners with the Thurston • An hour-long television County Noxious Weed Control Program to special featuring the provide biocontrol education and TCNWCP, The Nature implementation in the region. The TCNWCP Conservancy and the finds suitable release sites through field IWCP aired on Thurston surveys and works with IWCP personnel County TV over 20 times to redistribute biocontrol agents throughout since July 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Establishment Success Influenced Yb Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea Stoebe) Control Method
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Funded Articles Open Access Publishing Support Fund 2014 Native Plant Establishment Success Influenced yb Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) Control Method Laurelin M. Martin Grand Valley State University Neil W. MacDonald Grand Valley State University, [email protected] Tami E. Brown Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/oapsf_articles Part of the Biology Commons ScholarWorks Citation Martin, Laurelin M.; MacDonald, Neil W.; and Brown, Tami E., "Native Plant Establishment Success Influenced by Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) Control Method" (2014). Funded Articles. 15. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/oapsf_articles/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Publishing Support Fund at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Funded Articles by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESEARCH ARTICLE Native Plant Establishment Success Influenced by Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) Control Method Laurelin M. Martin, Neil W. MacDonald and Tami E. Brown ABSTRACT Invasive species frequently need to be controlled as part of efforts to reestablish native species on degraded sites. While the effectiveness of differing control methods are often reported, the impacts these methods have on the establishment of a native plant community are often unknown. To determine methods that effectively reduce spotted knapweed (Cen- taurea stoebe) while enhancing native species establishment, we tested 12 treatment combinations consisting of an initial site preparation (mowing, mowing + clopyralid, or mowing + glyphosate), in factorial combination with annual adult knapweed hand pulling and/or burning. We established 48 plots and applied site preparation treatments during summer 2008, seeded 23 native forbs and grasses during spring 2009, pulled adult knapweed annually from 2009–2012, and burned in the early spring 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Insects: a Hidden Biodiversity Crisis? 1
    Chapter 7—Terrestrial Insects: A Hidden Biodiversity Crisis? 1 Chapter 7 Terrestrial Insects: A Hidden Biodiversity Crisis? C.H. Dietrich Illinois Natural History Survey OBJECTIVES Like most other elements of the biota, the terrestrial insect fauna of Illinois has undergone drastic change since European colonization of the state. Although data are sparse or entirely lacking for most species, it is clear that many formerly abundant native species are now exceedingly rare while a few previously uncommon or undocumented species, both native and exotic, are now abundant. Much of this change may be attributable to fragmentation and loss of native habitats (e.g., deforestation, draining of wetlands, agricultural conversion and intensification, urbanization), although other factors such as invasion by exotic species (including plants, insects and pathogens), misuse of pesticides, and improper management of native ecosystems have probably also been involved. Data from Illinois and elsewhere in the north temperate zone provide evidence that at least some groups of terrestrial insects have undergone dramatic declines over the past several decades, suggesting that insects are no less vulnerable to anthropogenic environmental change than other groups of organisms Yet, insects continue to be under-represented on official lists of threatened or endangered species and conservation programs focus primarily on vertebrates and plants. This chapter summarizes available information on long-term changes in the terrestrial insect fauna of Illinois, reviews possible causes for these changes, highlights some urgent research needs, and provides recommendations for conservation and management of terrestrial insect communities. INTRODUCTION Insects are among the most important “little things that run the world” (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Twin Falls District Noxious Weed and Invasive
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Twin Falls District Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant Treatment DOI-BLM-ID-T000-2012-0001-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Twin Falls District 2878 Addison Avenue East Twin Falls, ID 83301 Phone: (208) 735-2060 FAX: (208) 735-2076 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................. 13 Background ............................................................................................................................... 13 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 14 Location of Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 15 Purpose and Need for Action .................................................................................................... 19 Conformance with Applicable Land Use Plans ........................................................................ 19 FMDA ................................................................................................................................... 20 Jarbidge RMP........................................................................................................................ 20 Craters of the Moon Monument MP ..................................................................................... 21 Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness
    [Show full text]
  • A Structural Growth Model of the Invasive Weed Species Yellow Starthistle, Centaurea Solstitialis L
    A Structural Growth Model of the Invasive Weed Species Yellow Starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. 1Thornby, D., 2J. Garren, 2R. Carruthers, 2D. Spencer and 2J.P. Weber 1Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries 2USDA Agricultural Research Service; Email: [email protected] Keywords: Centaurea solstitialis, yellow starthistle, structural model, LStudio, L-systems. EXTENDED ABSTRACT Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) is a summer-flowering annual plant of the family Asteraceae, and a significant weed of roadsides, pasture and grasslands in California. It is also distributed, though with less economic and ecological significance, throughout the US and in other temperate parts of the world. Yellow starthistle grows vigorously during the dormant period for most native species in its grasslands habitat, is able to access deep soil moisture reserves, and being particularly spiny, reduces land value for both animal fodder and human recreation. It is a prolific seed producer and seed spreads readily through contact with animals, people, and vehicles. As with many weeds, yellow starthistle's structure and growth patterns have been relatively little- Figure 1. Virtual yellow starthistle studied. It is hoped that studying the ontogenesis and morphogenesis of yellow starthistle will help Stochasticity was added to the model, so that it uncover information that can assist in improving reproduces a range of plants of different sizes and control strategies, as well as providing a morphologies, within the range of likely sizes visualisation tool for disseminating detailed observed in the data for each field site. knowledge about this plant's growth and development to stakeholders in a readily understood way.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Trophic Level Interactions Between the Invasive Plant
    MULTI-TROPHIC LEVEL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE INVASIVE PLANT CENTAUREA STOEBE, INSECTS AND NATIVE PLANTS by Christina Rachel Herron-Sweet A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Land Resources and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2014 ©COPYRIGHT by Christina Rachel Herron-Sweet 2014 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION To my parents and grandparents, who instilled in me the value of education and have been my biggest supporters along the way. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks go to my two advisers Drs. Jane Mangold and Erik Lehnhoff for all their tremendous support, advice and feedback during my graduate program. My two other committee members Drs. Laura Burkle and Jeff Littlefield also deserve a huge thank you for the time and effort they put into helping me with various aspects of my project. This research would not have been possible without the dedicated crew of field and lab helpers: Torrin Daniels, Darcy Goodson, Daniel France, James Collins, Ann de Meij, Noelle Orloff, Krista Ehlert, and Hally Berg. The following individuals deserve recognition for their patience in teaching me pollinator identification, and for providing parasitoid identifications: Casey Delphia, Mike Simanonok, Justin Runyon, Charles Hart, Stacy Davis, Mike Ivie, Roger Burks, Jim Woolley, David Wahl, Steve Heydon, and Gary Gibson. Hilary Parkinson and Matt Lavin also offered their expertise in plant identification. Statistical advice and R code was generously offered by Megan Higgs, Sean McKenzie, Pamela Santibanez, Dan Bachen, Michael Lerch, Michael Simanonok, Zach Miller and Dave Roberts. Bryce Christiaens, Lyn Huyser, Gil Gale and Craig Campbell provided instrumental consultation on locating field sites, and the Circle H Ranch, Flying D Ranch and the United States Forest Service graciously allowed this research to take place on their property.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Biological Control on Two Knapweed Species in British Columbia
    Impact of Biological Control on Two Knapweed Research Report Species in British Columbia Don Gayton, FORREX & Val Miller, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Abstract Diffuse and spotted knapweed ( Centaurea diffusa Lam and C. stoebe L.) are two closely re - lated invasives found in many parts of British Columbia’s Southern Interior, causing sub - stantial economic losses in rangelands. Beginning in 1970, the provincial government initiated a long-term biological control effort against the knapweeds, introducing 10 dif - ferent insect agents from 1970 to 1987. In an effort to evaluate the efficacy of the program, archival (1983–2008) data was amassed from 19 vegetation monitoring sites that contained knapweed. In 2010, these sites were relocated and re-monitored and cover values were an - alyzed. Diffuse knapweed showed significant declines at 14 of 15 sites; spotted knapweed declined at three of four sites. Possible alternative explanations for the decline are dis - cussed. Evidence strongly points to a suite of biocontrol agents (seed feeders and root feed - ers) as the primary drivers of knapweed decline in British Columbia’s Southern Interior. KEYWORDS : biological control; British Columbia; Centaurea ; knapweed; monitoring Introduction iffuse knapweed ( Centaurea diffusa Lam.) and spotted knapweed ( Centaurea stoebe L.) are two introduced, closely related invasive forbs. These species are most com - Dmon in the northwestern United States and in western Canada. Centaurea stoebe (also referred to as C. maculosa Lam. and C. biebersteinii DC) is particularly widespread, reported in 45 US states and all provinces of Canada (Marshall 2004; Zouhar 2001). The drought-tolerant C. diffusa has an altitudinal range of 150–900 m, whereas C.
    [Show full text]
  • How Many of Cassini Anagrams Should There Be? Molecular
    TAXON 59 (6) • December 2010: 1671–1689 Galbany-Casals & al. • Systematics and phylogeny of the Filago group How many of Cassini anagrams should there be? Molecular systematics and phylogenetic relationships in the Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae), with special focus on the genus Filago Mercè Galbany-Casals,1,3 Santiago Andrés-Sánchez,2,3 Núria Garcia-Jacas,1 Alfonso Susanna,1 Enrique Rico2 & M. Montserrat Martínez-Ortega2 1 Institut Botànic de Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia s.n., 08038 Barcelona, Spain 2 Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain 3 These authors contributed equally to this publication. Author for correspondence: Mercè Galbany-Casals, [email protected] Abstract The Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) comprises eleven genera, mainly distributed in Eurasia, northern Africa and northern America: Ancistrocarphus, Bombycilaena, Chamaepus, Cymbolaena, Evacidium, Evax, Filago, Logfia, Micropus, Psilocarphus and Stylocline. The main morphological character that defines the group is that the receptacular paleae subtend, and more or less enclose, the female florets. The aims of this work are, with the use of three chloroplast DNA regions (rpl32-trnL intergenic spacer, trnL intron, and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer) and two nuclear DNA regions (ITS, ETS), to test whether the Filago group is monophyletic; to place its members within Gnaphalieae using a broad sampling of the tribe; and to investigate in detail the phylogenetic relationships among the Old World members of the Filago group and provide some new insight into the generic circumscription and infrageneric classification based on natural entities. Our results do not show statistical support for a monophyletic Filago group.
    [Show full text]